Elsagate

Elsagate thumbnails featured familiar children's characters doing inappropriate or disturbing things, shown directly or suggested. Examples included injections, mutilation, childbirth, urination,fellatio,andchemical burning.

Elsagate(derived fromElsaand the-gatescandal suffix) is a controversy surrounding videos onYouTubeandYouTube Kidsthat were categorized as "child-friendly", but contained themesinappropriate for children.These videos often featured fictional characters from family-oriented media, sometimes viacrossovers,used without legal permission. The controversy also included channels that focused on real-life children, such asToy Freaks,that raised concern about possiblechild abuse.

Most videos in this category were produced either withlive actionorFlash animation,but some usedclaymationorcomputer-generated imagery.The videos were sometimes tagged in such a way as to circumvent YouTube's child safety algorithms, and some appeared on YouTube Kids. These videos were difficult to moderate due to the large scale of YouTube.In order to capturesearch resultsandattract attention from users,theirbuzzwordtitles and descriptions featured the names of the fictional characters, as well askeywordssuch as "education", "learn colors", and "nursery rhymes".They also includedautomatically placed commercials,making them lucrative to their owners and YouTube.

Public awareness of the phenomenon grew in late 2017. That year—after reports on child safety on YouTube by several media outlets—YouTube adopted stricter guidelines regarding children's content. In late November, the platform deleted channels and videos falling into the Elsagate category, as well as large amounts of other inappropriate videos or user comments relating to children.While these efforts, intended to wipe the platform of Elsagate-related media, curbed much of the older content, as of the 2020s similar videos and channels (this time utilizing video games popular with children) have been found to remain pervasively accessible to children on YouTube.

History

Early history (2016–2017)

In June 2016,The Guardianpublished an article about the channelWebs and Tiaras,which had been created in March of the same year. The channel showed people dressed as characters likeSpider-Man,Elsa,and theJokerengaging in bizarre or nonsensical actions. The videos themselves hadbackground musicbut no dialogue. The lack of dialogue meant that there was nolanguage barrieron the videos, which would normally hinder worldwide distribution. The article also reported that several nearly identical channels, namedToy Monster,The Superheroes Life,andThe Kids Club,had appeared on YouTube.

In January 2017, one channel under the control of a YouTube partner in Vietnam,Spiderman Frozen Marvel Superhero Real Life,blocked their Vietnamese subscribers after complaints from parents regarding the content of their videos.The channel's owner was later fined by Vietnamese authorities.

In early February 2017,Tubefilterinterviewed one ofWebs And Tiaras'creators, Eric, who insisted that the team has "never used anybotsor any other method to increase our views. "Given the channel's substantial numbers, he said," If we were not respecting the rules, YouTube would certainly have taken notice. "He also said that his team is based in Canada, and there is no larger company behind his channels, and that it represents agrassrootsproject among friends.

The increasing the number of views had led some to voice concerns that such channels aregaming the systemby using bots orclick farmsto inflateviewing figuresto higher proportions; however, there is no evidence for this.

In February 2017,The Vergecommented that "adults dressing up in costume and acting out weird, wordlessskitshas become a booming industry on the world's biggest video platform "and that while many videos were" puerile but benign ", others featured more questionable content, such asscatological humorand violent or sexual situations. The article noted that most videos were made with a very limited budget and "a fewHalloween costumes",which made them easy to produce and contributed to their multiplication. It also attributed their success to the frequent use of"Freudianconcerns ", which young children may find fascinating, amusing, or frightening, such as" peeing, pooping, kissing, pregnancy, and the terrifying notion of going to the doctor and getting a shot ".

Also in February,The Awlpublished an article onWebs and Tiarasand similar channels, describing their content as "nonsensically nightmarish" and "pretty twisted for children's content: some videos involve Elsa giving birth, and in some others, Spider-Man injects Elsa with a brightly colored liquid. You half expect the scenarios to bepornsetups. "In most videos, thelike and dislike optionswere disabled, which makes it difficult to understand how many users were actually engaging with them. Many videos feature hundreds of positive comments written by similar channels in an apparent attempt to attract more clicks.

In March, theBBCran a piece titled "The disturbing YouTube videos that are tricking children". The article focuses on aPeppa Pigimitation, where the titular character's teeth are painfully pulled out by a dentist, and a video featuring said character burning down an occupied house. The article also mentioned the existence of "hundreds" of similar videos, ranging fromunauthorizedbut otherwise harmless copies of authentic animations to frightening and gory content.

CTV Newsalso reported in March about YouTube's "fake toons problem", with adult-themed imitations of popular children's shows frequently appearing onYouTube Kids:"In some cases, the video will feature akid-friendlythumbnail, while the video itself might be entirely different "and be very unsuitable for small children. The network commented that such videos were" often nightmares to behold, with lots of frightening scenes involving monsters and blood. Many of these videos venture into dark territory, with the characters often being chased, attacked, or injured in a bloody manner. "

The term "Elsagate" was coined on the Internet in 2017. During the summer of that year, it became a popularhashtagonTwitteras users called attention to the presence of such material on YouTube and YouTube Kids.OnReddit,an Elsagate subreddit (r/ElsaGate) was created on June 23 to discuss the phenomenon, soon attracting tens of thousands of users.

Discovery of Elsagate videos (2017)

In November 2017, several newspapers published articles about the YouTube channelToy Freaks,which had been created two years earlier by a single father named Greg Chism.Toy Freakshad a total of 8.54 million subscribers and were among the top 100 most viewed channels before it shut down that month. The channel often featured Chism's daughters, and in most cases showed them scared or crying.

Several individuals, including the rapperB.o.Band commentary channelh3h3Productions,discussed Elsagate on social media during this time.

On November 4,The New York Timespublished an article about the "startling" videos slipping past YouTube's filters and disturbing children, "either by mistake or because bad actors have found ways to fool the YouTube Kids' algorithms".On November 6, authorJames Bridlewrote onMediumabout his worry about videos aimed at scaring, hurting, and exploiting children. He said these videos were common on YouTube, and noticed that many of these videos were confusing as obvious parodies and imitations interacted with algorithm-driven content creators, which led to content that mixed up populartropes,characters, and keywords. He said this made videos with real people resemble automated content.On November 17, Internet commentatorPhilip DeFrancoposted a video addressing the issue.

The New York Timesfound that one of the channels featuring counterfeit cartoons,Super Zeus TV,was linked to a website calledSuperKidsShop,registered inHo Chi Minh City,Vietnam. A man working forSuperKidsShopconfirmed that his partners were responsible for the videos, on which "a team of about 100 people" were producing. Subsequent requests for an interview went unanswered.

On November 9, members of the satirical sound collage groupNegativlandpresented an episode of their weekly radio showOver the Edgededicated to Elsagate."'Modern Animal Kids'threads Elsagate through a remix of three '90s episodes ofOver the Edgewhich focused on media for children, all broadcast in the final years beforeTeletubbiespioneered marketing to the 6- to 18-month-old demographic ".

On November 22,BuzzFeed Newspublished an article about unsettling videos that depict children in disturbing and abusive situations. The information on the article came with the assistance of journalist and human rights activistMatan Uziel,whose investigation and report to theFBIon that matter were sent on September 22, informing its leadership about "tens of thousands of videos available on YouTube that we know are crafted to serve as eye candy] forperverted,creepy adults and online predators to indulge in their child fantasies ".

On November 23, French-Canadian outletTabloïdreleased a video investigation aboutToy Monster,a channel linked toWebs and Tiaras.They confronted the videos' creators – based out of the south shore ofQuebec City– who refused to be interviewed. One of the actors featured in the videos anonymously stated that he was contractually obligated to refrain from commenting. The investigation revealed that identical content was being posted on numerous channels apparently operated by the same people.

2020s

Although YouTube initiated a crackdown on Elsagate content in 2017, videos hosting similar content have continued to be found on the website in the following years. Much of the content is based on video gameIPspopular with children, such asMinecraft,Among UsorPoppy Playtime,and is both marketed towards, and freely accessible to, children. And while YouTube Kids disallows inappropriate content and is intended to steer children away from the main app, the efficacy of that method has been called into question.

An investigation, published byWiredon 30 March 2021, found dozens of "disturbing" or "grotesque" animated videos, targetingMinecraftandAmong Usfans, that were featured under Youtube's "Topics" or "hashtags" pages for the games. The magazine argued that these newer discoverability features lacked moderation, and allowed "opportunistic" channels to display questionable or inappropriate content. One livestream showcased an animated video of "a femaleMinecraftavatar with bare breasts opening a present full of the poop emoji ", as well as a thumbnail featuring" two inflated breasts [holding] up a poopMinecraftbrick ", with other inappropriate or disturbingMinecraftorAmong US-style thumbnails, easily seen via the Topics or hashtags sections. Still, the magazine acknowledged the 2017 purge and stated that their findings didn't represent "a direct Elsagate repeat", noting that these videos were not on YouTube Kids, that much of their shocking content was limited to the thumbnails only, and that many of the more obvious ways of targeting children had been challenged by the purge.

In 2022,Newsweekalso reported on channels and videos containing similarly inappropriate content or thumbnails, featuring characters from horror games such asFive Nights at Freddy'sandPoppy Playtimethat were popular with children. The magazine described suggestive thumbnails, as well as content that featured drugs (includingdate rape drugs) and violence, such as murder,school shootings,or physical abuse towards children and female characters. Youtube responded, stating that "the content shared has not been found in the YouTube Kids app which is our recommended experience for children under 13." However, Sonia Livingstone, professor at the London School of Economics and expert on children's digital safety, argued that this was "insufficient" given that the main app still had the content in question accessible to children, with poor "moderation, labeling," and "age-gating."Newsweekfurther contended that, while YouTube encourages creators to age-restrict content intended for older users and disallows "misleading" content that targets minors while displaying inappropriate themes, none of the videos they found had been age-restricted.

Effect on children

The New York Timesquoted pediatrics professor Michael Rich, who considered it upsetting that "characters [children] thought they knew and trusted" were shown behaving in an improper or violent manner.

Response from YouTube

In response to the controversy, on 1 June 2017, YouTube changed its guidelines, specifically to ban children's characters in inappropriate situations. Unfortunately, that ban had little effect, and in the months after, the subredditr/elsagatebecame a reliable place for amateur investigators to raise the alarm on videos that slipped through YouTube's moderation system.

In August 2017, YouTube announced its new guidelines on content and monetization. In an ongoing series ofefforts to demonetize controversial and offensive videos,it was announced that creators would no longer be able to monetize videos that "made inappropriate use of family-friendly characters". In November of the same year, it announced that it would implement "a new policy that age restricts this content in the YouTube main app when flagged".

The controversy extended to channels that featured not necessarily children's characters but actual children, who sometimes performed inappropriate or dangerous activities under the guidance of adults. As part of a broader action, YouTube terminated the channelToy Freaks,which featured a father (Greg Chism) and his two daughters in potentially abusive situations.Chism was subsequently investigated bychild-protection officialsinIllinoisandMissourifor alleged child abuse.In December 2017, authorities announced that Chism would not face criminal charges.Before its removal, the channel had over 8.5 million subscribers.

It was also revealed in the media that many videos featuring minors – frequently uploaded by the children themselves and showing innocent content – had attracted comments frompedophilesand other groups. Some of these videos were monetized. As a result of the controversy, several major advertisers froze spending on YouTube, forcing YouTube to ban children from their site, citing legal obligations.

On November 22, 2017, YouTube announced that it had deleted over 50 channels and thousands of videos that did not fit the new guidelines.On November 27, the company said in a statement toBuzzFeed Newsthat it had "terminated more than 270 accounts and removed over 150,000 videos", "turned off comments on more than 625,000 videos targeted by child predators" and "removed ads from nearly 2 million videos and over 50,000 channels masquerading as family-friendly content".Forbescontributor Dani Di Placido wrote that many problematic videos could still be seen on the platform, and that "the sheer volume of videos hastily deleted from the site prove that YouTube's algorithms were utterly ineffective at protecting young children".

In December 2017, as advertisers pulled ads, YouTube CEOSusan Wojcickiannounced new moderation guidelines, removing inappropriate children’s content and bringing the total number of moderators up to 10,000.

See also

• Balenciaga § Child advertising controversy
• Content farm
• Child Online Protection Act(COPA) andChildren's Online Privacy Protection Act(COPPA)
• FamilyOFive
• Fantastic Adventures scandal
• YouTube § Child safety and wellbeing

External links

• Bridle, James(April 2018).The nightmare videos of children's YouTube — and what's wrong with the internet today(Video).Vancouver:TED.