Vibhu
Part ofa serieson | |
Hindu philosophy | |
---|---|
Orthodox | |
|
|
Heterodox | |
|
|
Vibhu(Sanskrit:विभु) means – 'mighty', 'powerful', 'eminent', 'supreme', 'able to', 'capable of', 'self-subdued', 'firm' or 'self-controlled'; inNyayaphilosophy, it means – 'eternal', 'existing everywhere', 'all-pervading', 'pervading all material things'.[1]This word also refers tomanasor mind.[2]This word has its root in the term,bhū( भू), meaning – 'become', 'arise', 'come into existence'; thusvibhumeans – 'expand', 'become manifest', 'appear', 'pervade'.[3]
Vedic significance
[edit]FromAtharvavedait is learnt that Sudhanvan Angirasa had three sons, Ribhu, Vibhu and Vaja, collectively known asRibhuswho were intelligent sages.[4]They carried the luminous power of knowledge to this world, which knowledge pervaded the world as nectar. Ribhu or Ribhukshan was skillful at handling knowledge; Vibhu or Vibhawa was skillful in pervading and diffusing, and Vaja handled embodied plenitude with similar skill; all three dwelled in the solar-region and are considered to be the rays of the sun.[5]They are the three leaders of rites and the possessors of opulence, and the three deities of several Rig Vedic hymns.[6]
A mantra of theRig Vedareads as follows:-
- एकस्य चिन्मे विभ्वस्त्वोजो या नु दधृष्वान् कृणवै मनीषा |
- अहं ह्युग्रो मरुतो विदानो यानि चयवमिन्द्र इदीश एषाम् || (Rig VedaI.165.10)
In the Rig Veda, the word,vibhu,means – 'all-pervading unified entity that permeates or extends throughout a spatial expanse', as is in the afore-cited mantra wherein the phrase - एकस्य चिन्मे विभ्वस्त्वोजः which means - "Though I be but one, let my might be extensive."[7]Though the words,vibhuandprabhu,appear in theRig Vedabut these words have a fixed psychological significance –vibhumeans - 'coming into existence to pervade the whole being asānanda,andprabhumeans - 'coming into existence as a specific object or particular experience within the range of one's consciousness'.[8]A sage of the Rig Veda (II.xxiv.11) asserts that:-
- विभु प्रभु प्रथमं मेहनावतो बृहस्पतेः सुविदत्राणि राध्या |
- इमा सातानि वेन्यस्य वाजिनो येन जना उभ्यें भुञ्जते विशः ||
Brihaspati,the lord of the heaven of light and the guardian ofrta,is present in all things and beings (vibhu) same as theBrahmanof theVedanta.[9]
Philosophical significance
[edit]In theKaushitaki Upanishad,while describing the world of Brahman, there is the mention of the hall of Brahman calledVibhu(or built byVibhuhere meaning – 'egoism') arriving at which hall the glory of Brahman reaches the one who seeks liberation, where the seeker thinks himself to be Brahman, and thinking thus approaches the throneVikakshanā('perception'), in other words, the seeker having become liberated experiences Brahman, his own true nature.[10]Gaudapadain hiskārikāon theMandukya Upanishadstating:-
- निवृत्तेः सर्वदुःखानामीशानः प्रभुरव्ययः |
- अद्वैतः सर्वभावानां देवस्तुर्यो विभु स्मृतः ||
describes the fourth state (turiya) as the ordainer (iśana), as the supreme lord (prabhu), as the non-dual (advaita) and the all-pervading (vibhu) god (devata) of all beings. Here, the word,avyaya,means that which is not subject to change; andturiyaisvibhubecause it pervades all the three states.[11]
According to all six orthodoxVedicdarśanaswhich compriseHindu philosophy,with the exception ofRamanuja’s 'theory of atomic dimensionless soul', theātmānisvibhu('omnipresent'). The followers ofJainism,who believe that theātmānassumes the size corresponding to the size of the body it occupies, also believe that in the final state of liberation it remains unalterable, but they reject the Hindu theory ofvibhuwhich to them does not explain if the soul is same at all times everywhere why for is there the experience individual self. Vedāntists argue that for the atman to be unchangeable in the state of liberation then it must be regarded either asanu('minute') or asvibhu('pervasive').[12][13]The contention of theYoga schoolthat thejivatmanand theparamatmanare both mere consciousnesses and both are all-pervading (vibhu) and thatmokshais merely the cessation of pain is also refuted – एतेन योगः प्रत्युक्तः (Brahma SutrasII.i.3).[14]
Advaita Vedantarests on the premise that only the substratum (Brahman) is real, the phenomenal world all with its properties and relations is unreal and due tomaya.Substance, in its pure subtle state is the constitutive cause of things, and in its rational state it is the substratum of qualities, actions, etc., and exists in nine forms – earth (prithivi), water (jala), fire (agni), air (vayu), space (akasha) ('which five constitute the physical world'), direction (disha) ('without which no movement is not possible'), time (kaal) ('the substratum and the causal factor of all psycho-physical product and worldly behaviour'), mind (manas) and self (ātmān); the first four and mind areparamanus('infinitesimal') and the rest arevibhu('ubiquitous'), simple and infinite.[15]Vindhyāvāsī, giving up the doctrine of the three psychical organs, associates the processes of the faculty of knowledge (buddhi) and I-consciousness with the thinking organ (manah) which three were the great all –penetratingvibhu.Vyasa too held mind (citta) to be all-penetrating (vibhu).[16]Shankaraexplains that "the Self (Brahman), which is by nature all-pervasive (vibhu) assumes the form and qualities of thebuddhiwhen apparently moving in the cycle of empirical existence. "[17]Brahman, who is omnipresent (sarvagata), is without attributes; Brahman with attributes isIshvara,who isvibhupossessingmahāmāyā,and who through his diverse powers creates all this diversity experienced through the senses.[18]
References
[edit]- ^V.S.Apte.The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary.Digital Dictionaries of South Asia. p. 1455.
- ^Suresh chander Banerjee (1995).Studies in Origin and Development of Yoga from Vedic times.Punthi Pustak. p. 469.ISBN9788185094922.
- ^William K. Mahoney (January 1998).The Artful Universe.SUNY Press. p. 242.ISBN9780791435793.
- ^Nagendra Kumar Singh (1997).Vedic Mythology.APH Publications. p. 196.ISBN9788170248675.
- ^Richard Leviton (2014-07-16).The Mertowney Mountain Interviews.iUniverse. p. 383.ISBN9781491741290.
- ^Rig Veda Samhita.N.Trubner. 1866. p. 115.
- ^Theodore Nicholas Proferes (2007).Vedic Ideals of Sovereignty and the Poetics of Power.American Oriental Society. p. 27.ISBN9780940490215.
- ^Sri Aurobindo (2003).The Secret of the Vedas.Sri Aurobindo Ashram. p. 355.ISBN9788170587149.
- ^A.B.Keith (1989).The Religion and Philosophy of the Vedas and Upanishads.Motilal Banarsidass. p. 448.ISBN9788120806443.
- ^sacred Books of the East.The Floating Press. June 2009. pp. 262, 263.ISBN9781775415312.
- ^Richard King (January 1995).Early Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism.SUNY Press. p. 67.ISBN9780791425138.
- ^Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions.University of California Press. January 1980. p.219.ISBN9780520039230.
vibhu vedas.
- ^Sitanath Tattvabhushan (2004).Brahmasutram.Genesis Publishing. p. lxii.ISBN9788177559613.
- ^Baman Das Basu (2007).The Sacred books of the Hindus.Genesis Publishing. p. 221.ISBN9788130705163.
- ^Encyclopaedia of Oriental Philosophy and Religion.Global Vision. 2005. p. 557.ISBN9788182200739.
- ^Erich Frauwallner (1973).history of Indian Philosophy.Motilal Banarsidass. p. 323.ISBN9788120809888.
- ^Shyama Kumar chattopadhyaya (2000).The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita Vedanta.Sarup & Sons. p. 352.ISBN9788176252225.
- ^Nrsimhacarana Panda (1995).The Vibrating Universe.Motilal Banarsidass. p. 56.ISBN9788120812918.