Jump to content

Xu Ci

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Xu Ci
Hứa từ
Empress's Chamberlain ( đại trường thu )
In office
?(?)–?(?)
MonarchLiu Shan
Personal details
BornUnknown
Nanyang, Henan
DiedUnknown
ChildrenXu Xun
OccupationOfficial, scholar
Courtesy nameRendu ( nhân đốc )

Xu Ci(fl.third century),courtesy nameRendu,was an official and scholar of the state ofShu Hanin theThree Kingdomsperiod of China.[1][2]An outsider to the province, he and Hu Qian's disorderly conduct would hamper a scholarly project and see his superior put on a play mocking the poor conduct of those involved.

Life

[edit]

Xu Ci was fromNanyang Commandery( Nam Dương quận ), which is around present-dayNanyang, Henan.He was born sometime in the lateEastern Han dynastyand had studied under the tutelage of Liu Xi ( Lưu 熈). He specialised in the teachings of theConfucianscholarZheng Xuan,theYijing,Book of Documents,Etiquette and Ceremonial,Book of Rites,Rites of Zhou,Mao CommentaryandAnalects of Confucius.Sometime between 196 and 220, he metXu Jingand others inJiao Province(covering parts of present-dayGuangxi,Guangdongand northernVietnam) and later accompanied them toYi Province(covering present-daySichuanandChongqing).[3]

At the time, among the non-native scholars living in Yi Province, there was one Hu Qian ( hồ tiềm ), whosecourtesy namewas Gong xing ( công hưng ). Nobody knew why he left his home inWei Commandery( Ngụy quận; around present-dayHandan,Hebei) and travelled all the way to Yi Province. While Hu Qian was not as well-read and knowledgeable as the others, he was intelligent and had a very good memory. He memorised and knew by heart everything about Confucian rites, rituals, procedures, protocol, etc., ranging from ancestral worship to the five types of mourning attire.[4][a]

In 214,[6]after the warlordLiu Beiseized controlof Yi Province from its governor,Liu Zhang,he saw that Confucian customs and education in the province were very disorderly due to years of neglect. He wanted to revive Confucianism in Yi Province and establish a set of rituals and procedures for the region, so he set up an education office to oversee this project. Apart from building up a library of Confucian texts, Liu Bei also appointed Xu Ci and Hu Qian as academicians ( tiến sĩ ), serving at the academy,[7]and ordered them to work with other scholars such asMeng GuangandLai Minon this project.[8]

While the project was still in its initial stage of development, bitter disagreements and quarrels broke out among the scholars due to differences in opinion. Xu Ci and Hu Qian started making accusations and taking petty revenge against each other including withholding books. They bickered among themselves and constantly sought opportunities to provoke each other. They also praised themselves and scorned their colleagues.[9]When Liu Bei heard about it, he came up with an idea to urge them to put aside their differences and cooperate with each other. He gathered all the officials for a feast and had actors put on a skit parodying the conflict between Xu Ci and Hu Qian, showing how a war of words between them led to them using weapons to attack each other.[10]Despite Liu Bei's efforts, the project ultimately turned out to be a failure.[1]

Hu Qian died before Xu Ci in an unknown year. Following the end of theEastern Han dynastyin 220, Xu Ci was consulted by officials on the proper rites for establishing an Emperor,[11]served in the state ofShu Han,founded by Liu Bei in 221, during theThree Kingdomsperiod. After Liu Bei's death in 223,[12]Xu Ci continued serving underLiu Shan,Liu Bei's son and successor. During Liu Shan's reign, he held the appointment of Empress's Chamberlain ( đại trường thu ). He died in an unknown year.[13]

Xu Ci's son, Xu Xun ( hứa huân ), inherited his father's legacy and served as an academician ( tiến sĩ ) in Shu.[14]

Appraisal

[edit]

Chen Shounoted Xu Ci had broad knowledge and experience, a learned man of his age[15]while the Jin historian and criticSun Shengremarked, such men being hired by Liu Bei reflected the lack of scholars in Shu-Han.[16]J. Michael Farmer notes Chen Shou focused on their characters rather than their intellectual contributions, using a humorous story to highlight their pettiness. Chen Shou also used Xu Ci and Hu Qian to assert the supremacy of his local intellectual tradition over that of outside scholars from the Central Plains. He also used Xu Ci and Hu Qian to show the poor state of intellectual affairs in the early years of Shu Han with the concern of Liu Bei about it.[17]In the debate on the way Zheng Xuan's work gained influence in theChengduarea, Yoshikawa Tadao argues Xu Ci played a key role in bringing its influence to the province.[7]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The historianSun Shengpointed out thatChen Shouembedded Hu Qian's biography in Xu Ci's biography in theRecords of the Three Kingdomsbecause there were too few notable scholars in Shu (and too little information about them),[5]so it did not make sense to have individual biographies for all of them.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abde Crespigny (2007),p. 902.
  2. ^Farmer, J. Michael.The Talent of Shu: Qiao Zhou and the Intellectual World of Earl Medieval Sichuan.Albany: State University of New York Press. p. 26.ISBN978-0-7914-7163-0.
  3. ^( hứa từ tự nhân đốc, Nam Dương người cũng. Học thầy Lưu 熈, thiện Trịnh thị học, trị dễ, thượng thư, tam lễ, mao thơ, luận ngữ. Kiến An trung, cùng hứa tĩnh chờ đều tự giao phối châu nhập Thục. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  4. ^( khi lại có Ngụy quận hồ tiềm, tự công hưng, không biết này cho nên ở ích thổ. Tiềm tuy học không dính hiệp, nhiên tuyệt vời cường thức, tổ tông chế độ chi nghi, tang kỷ năm phục chi số, toàn chỉ chưởng họa mà, nhấc tay nhưng thải. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  5. ^( tôn thịnh rằng: Thục ít người sĩ, cố từ, tiềm chờ cũng thấy tái thuật. ) Sun Sheng's annotation inSanguozhivol. 42.
  6. ^Zizhi Tong gianvol. 67.
  7. ^abFarmer, J. Michael.The Talent of Shu: Qiao Zhou and the Intellectual World of Earl Medieval Sichuan.Albany: State University of New York Press. p. 78.ISBN978-0-7914-7163-0.
  8. ^( trước chủ định Thục, thừa loạn lạc chết chóc lịch kỷ, việc học suy phế, nãi tập hợp điển tịch, sa thái chúng học, từ, tiềm cũng vì tiến sĩ, cùng Mạnh quang, tới mẫn chờ điển chưởng cũ văn. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  9. ^( giá trị thứ sự sáng lập, động đa nghi nghị, từ, tiềm càng tương khắc phạt, báng độc phẫn tranh, hình với thanh sắc; thư tịch có vô, không tương thông mượn, khi tìm sở thát, lấy tương chấn 攇. Này căng mình đố bỉ, thậm chí với này. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  10. ^( trước chủ mẫn này nếu tư, quần liêu đại hội, sử xướng gia giả vì nhị tử chi dung. Hiệu này tụng 䦧 chi trạng, rượu hàm nhạc làm, cho rằng chơi đùa, sơ lấy từ nghĩa tương khó, chung lấy đao trượng tương khuất, dùng cảm thiết chi. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  11. ^Sanguozhivol.32.
  12. ^Zizhi Tong gianvols. 69–70.
  13. ^( tiềm trước không, từ sau chủ thế hơi dời đến đại trường thu, đã chết. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  14. ^( tử huân truyền này nghiệp, phục vì tiến sĩ. )Sanguozhivol. 42.
  15. ^Hứa, Mạnh, tới, Lý, bác thiệp thấy nhiều biết rộng, Doãn mặc tinh với tả thị, tuy không lấy đức nghiệp vì xưng, tin toàn nhất thời chi học sĩ Sanguozhivol.42.
  16. ^Thục ít người sĩ, cố từ, tiềm chờ cũng thấy tái thuật. Annotation in Sanguozhivol.42
  17. ^Farmer, J. Michael.The Talent of Shu: Qiao Zhou and the Intellectual World of Earl Medieval Sichuan.Albany: State University of New York Press. pp. 25–27.ISBN978-0-7914-7163-0.