1992 Maryland Question 6
 | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Abortion Law Revision | |||||||||||||||||||
| Results | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Source: Maryland State Board of Elections[1] | |||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Maryland |
|---|
 |
 Government |
Question 6was a voter referendum to allow voters to approve or reject a law passed by theMaryland General Assemblyin 1991 to codify theU.S. Supreme Court's decision inRoe v. Wade.The referendum was approved by 61.7% of voters on November 3, 1992.
Ballot measure
[edit]A draft of the referendum language had been sent to both pro-choice and pro-life groups by Maryland Attorney GeneralJ. Joseph Curran Jr.to prevent controversy over the wording of the question. He asked the groups to comment on the draft by June 19, 1992,[2]and, after receiving feedback, rewrote the question to use "less cryptic" language.[3]The ballot language was revised for a third and final time before being submitted to theMaryland Secretary of Stateto appear on the general election ballot.[4]
After the language was approved, the Vote kNOw Coalition filed a lawsuit asking for the ballot language to be rewritten.[5]Judge Bruce C. Williams rejected the language and ordered the attorney general to rewrite the ballot wording[6]in a ruling that was later struck down by theMaryland Court of Appeals.[7]
The ballot measure read as follows:[1]
Question 6
Abortion Law Revision
Revises Maryland's abortion law to prohibit State interference with woman's abortion decision before fetus is viable, or, under certain conditions, at any time and to provide certain exceptions to the requirement that a physician notify an unmarried minor's parent or guardian prior to minor's abortion; repeals pre-abortion information requirements about abortion alternatives; repeals some, and clarifies other, provisions related to abortion referral; requires that abortions be performed by licensed physicians; provides good-faith immunity under certain conditions to physicians performing abortions; authorizes State to adopt abortion regulations; repeals certain penalty and disciplinary provisions related to the performance of abortions.
The choices read as follows:[1]
Forthe Referred Law
Againstthe Referred Law
History
[edit]In 1968, the Maryland General Assembly passed a bill that would require abortions in the state to be performed in a hospital and approved by a hospital review committee.[8]This legislation would later be overturned by the Supreme Court's decision inRoe v. Wade,which prevented the government from placing restrictions on abortions beforefetal viability.[9]
Legislative debate on abortion had intensified following the Supreme Court's decision inWebster v. Reproductive Health Services,which imposed restrictions on state funding for abortions, withpro-choicelawmakers introducing a bill to codify theRoedecision amid fears that the Supreme Court would overturn its previous decision, thereby reinstating Maryland's restrictive 1968 law.[10]Senate PresidentThomas V. Miller Jr.,who self-identified as apro-life,pledged to remain neutral on the debate but said that he personally favored laws that restricted abortion, adding that if the procedure was necessary, "you've gotWashington, D.C.,35 miles down the road ".[9]House SpeakerR. Clayton Mitchell Jr.also declined to bring any abortion bills up for a vote, saying that he would wait until the Senate takes action on the issue before he'd bring it up.[10]
By 1990, abortion advocates had secured a majority in theMaryland Senateand introduced legislation that would codify theRoedecision, but it was unclear if the legislation had the votes to defeat afilibuster.[9]Pro-choice lawmakers were initially unable to reach the 32 votes required to break the Republican-led filibuster, with the Senate voting 28–18 to continue debate on the bill.[11]Legislators continued to filibuster the bill for eight days before coming to an agreement to couple the abortion rights legislation with another bill that would prevent the bill from going into effect until voters approved of it in a statewide referendum.[12]However, both bills were killed by state delegateWilliam A. Clarkin the House Environmental Matters Committee, who argued in voting against the two bills that action on the House floor would be "chaotic" and force legislators "to go on record on the vote".[13]In that year'sstate Senate elections,pro-abortion group Choice PAC primaried four incumbent Democratic state senators who filibustered the abortion rights bill, giving advocates the votes they needed to pass the bill during next year's legislative session.[14]
At the start of the 1991 legislative session, Miller promised that the abortion bill would be "the first major issue the Senate takes up" that year.[15]The new bill included a parental notification clause that Miller believed the public would be more accepting of it was to head to a referendum.[16]Anti-abortion state senators conceded that they did not have the votes to hold a filibuster on the bill, but said they would propose amendments to the bill that would outlaw abortions for sex-select reasons, ban abortion services advertising, and requiring parental consent for abortions performed on underage girls.[17]All amendments to the bill were rejected after five and a half hours of debate,[18]and the bill eventually passed and was signed into law by GovernorWilliam Donald Schaefer.[19]Afterwards, anti-abortion activists, led by former Lieutenant GovernorSamuel Bogleyand his Right to kNOw Coalition,[20][21]said they planned to collect enough signatures to petition the law in the 1992 general election.[22]In late June, the coalition submitted 143,622 voter signatures—more than four times the 33,373 valid signatured required—to petition the law, which were certified by the Maryland State Board of Elections in July.[23][24]
Campaign
[edit]Pro-choice groups led raised $1.6 million during the campaign to support Question 6, with most contributions being transferred to the Maryland for Choice committee, while abortion opponents raised $1.46 million, almost all of which was through the Vote kNOw Coalition.[25]The pro-life campaign involved criticizing the 1991 abortion bill as "extremist", while abortion advocates called it a "moderate compromise". Anti-Question 6 ballots were also distributed in Roman Catholic churches and other congregations, and television commercials opposing Question 6, including one featuring neurosurgeonBen Carson,[26][27]were ran onWMAR-TVandWBAL-TV.[28]Carson later condemned the advertisement and asked for it to be taken down, saying that he had not known that he was making a political advertisement.[29]
Turnout in the1992 general electionswere boosted by Question 6 and tax issues,[28]which theMaryland Republican Partybelieved would hurt PresidentGeorge H. W. Bush,who was pro-life.[30]
Endorsements
[edit]U.S. Senators
- Bill Bradley,U.S. Senator fromNew Jersey(Democrat)[31]
U.S. Representatives
- Kweisi Mfume,U.S. Representative fromMaryland's 7th congressional district(Democrat)[32]
- Parren Mitchell,former U.S. Representative fromMaryland's 7th congressional district(Democrat)[33]
Statewide officials
- Hillary Clinton,First Lady of Arkansasand wife of presidential nomineeBill Clinton(Democrat)[34]
- Nelson J. Sabatini, Secretary of the Maryland Department of Health and Hygiene (Democrat)[35]
- Melvin Steinberg,Lieutenant Governor of Maryland (Democrat)[36]
State delegates
- Delores G. Kelley,state delegate from the42nd district(Democrat)[32]
- Lawrence A. LaMotte, state delegate fromdistrict 5B(Democrat)[37]
- Mary Louise Preis,state delegate from the34th district(Democrat)[38]
- Samuel I. Rosenberg,state delegate from the42nd district(Democrat)[39]
Local officials
- Kurt Schmoke,mayor of Baltimore(Democrat)[40]
Party officials
- Vera Hall, chair of theMaryland Democratic Party(Democrat)[32]
Individuals
- Marion C. Bascom,civil rights leader and pastor atMadison Avenue Methodist Episcopal Church[32]
- Gloria Steinem,journalist and social-political activist[41]
Organizations
- American Civil Liberties Union[42]
- MarylandLeague of Women Voters[43]
- National Abortion Rights Action League[44]
- Planned Parenthoodof Maryland[45]
Newspapers
U.S. Executive Branch officials
- Alan Keyes,formerAssistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs(Republican)[49]
Statewide elected officials
- Samuel Bogley,former Lieutenant Governor of Maryland (Democrat)[20]
State senators
- Larry E. Haines,state senator from the5th district(Republican)[50]
State delegates
- Marsha G. Perry, state delegate from the33rd district(Democrat)[44]
Individuals
- Frederica Mathewes-Green,author and speaker[51]
Organizations
- Maryland Catholic Conference[52]
Opinion polls
[edit]| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size[a] |
Margin of error |
For | Against | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George Washington University[53] | October 20–24, 1992 | 403 (RV) | ± 4.0% | 70% | 20% | 10%[b] |
| Mason-Dixon Research[54] | October 1992 | 809 (RV) | ± 3.5% | 52% | 36% | 12% |
| Mason-Dixon Research[55] | August 28–30, 1992 | 802 (RV) | ± 3.5% | 54% | 29% | 17% |
| Mason-Dixon Research[56] | June 3–5, 1992 | 815 (LV) | ± 3.5% | 60% | 32% | 8% |
| KPC Research[57] | February 10–15, 1992 | 1,210 (RV) | ± 2.8% | 57% | 31% | 12% |
Results
[edit]| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
 Yes
|
1,114,377 | 61.74 |
| No | 690,542 | 38.26 |
| Total votes | 1,804,919 | 100.00 |
Source: Maryland State Board of Elections[1]
County breakdown
[edit]| By county | For | Against | Total votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | |||
| Allegany | 9,478 | 38.60% | 15,079 | 61.40% | 24,557 | 100.00% |
| Anne Arundel | 108,394 | 60.40% | 71,077 | 39.60% | 179,471 | 100.00% |
| Baltimore | 180,818 | 61.38% | 113,755 | 38.62% | 294,573 | 100.00% |
| Baltimore City | 132,697 | 66.37% | 67,237 | 38.62% | 199,934 | 100.00% |
| Calvert | 10,944 | 56.62% | 8,385 | 43.38% | 19,329 | 100.00% |
| Caroline | 3,482 | 49.52% | 3,550 | 50.48% | 7,032 | 100.00% |
| Carroll | 26,362 | 51.00% | 25,328 | 49.00% | 51,690 | 100.00% |
| Cecil | 11,015 | 48.73% | 11,590 | 51.27% | 22,605 | 100.00% |
| Charles | 14,994 | 50.32% | 14,804 | 49.68% | 29,798 | 100.00% |
| Dorchester | 4,789 | 54.26% | 4,037 | 45.74% | 8,826 | 100.00% |
| Frederick | 32,721 | 54.26% | 29,042 | 47.02% | 61,763 | 100.00% |
| Garrett | 2,683 | 30.13% | 6,223 | 69.87% | 8,906 | 100.00% |
| Harford | 41,125 | 53.07% | 36,360 | 46.93% | 77,485 | 100.00% |
| Howard | 63,141 | 64.80% | 34,305 | 35.20% | 97,446 | 100.00% |
| Kent | 4,026 | 65.01% | 2,167 | 34.99% | 6,193 | 100.00% |
| Montgomery | 246,361 | 70.12% | 104,982 | 29.88% | 351,343 | 100.00% |
| Prince George's | 153,741 | 66.25% | 78,328 | 33.75% | 232,069 | 100.00% |
| Queen Anne's | 7,542 | 60.38% | 4,948 | 39.62% | 12,490 | 100.00% |
| St. Mary's | 9,852 | 46.87% | 11,166 | 53.13% | 21,018 | 100.00% |
| Somerset | 2,350 | 41.89% | 3,260 | 58.11% | 5,610 | 100.00% |
| Talbot | 7,643 | 63.77% | 4,342 | 36.23% | 11,985 | 100.00% |
| Washington | 19,187 | 47.19% | 21,473 | 52.81% | 40,660 | 100.00% |
| Wicomico | 12,975 | 52.24% | 11,861 | 47.76% | 24,836 | 100.00% |
| Worcester | 8,057 | 52.66% | 7,243 | 47.34% | 15,300 | 100.00% |
| Total | 1,114,377 | 61.74% | 690,542 | 38.26% | 1,804,919 | 100.00% |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^abcd"1992 Presidential Election Official Results for Statewide Questions".elections.maryland.gov.Maryland State Board of Elections. February 16, 2001.RetrievedNovember 17,2023.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (June 6, 1992)."Both sides asked about wording of abortion question".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (June 27, 1992)."Second version has more words, is 'less cryptic'".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (July 7, 1992)."Anti-abortion camp doesn't like wording of ballot question".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (July 30, 1992)."Abortion foes file lawsuit over ballot language".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Stuckey, Tom (August 13, 1992)."Abortion language rejected".The Daily Times.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (August 20, 1992)."Foes of abortion lose court battle on ballot wording".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Assembly OK's Viet Measure Amid Uproar, Ends Session".The Evening Sun.March 27, 1968.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^abcShen, Fern (February 25, 1990)."Miller takes center stage on abortion".The Washington Post.RetrievedNovember 17,2023.
- ^ab"Abortion advocates move to pre-empt high court".The Baltimore Sun.January 8, 1990.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Filibuster blocks bill".The Star Democrat.March 16, 1990.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy; Frece, John W. (March 23, 1990)."Senate OKs 2 abortion bills; filibuster ends".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Birch, Doug; Bowie, Liz (March 24, 1990)."House panel, by 1 vote, kills both abortion bills".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Fletcher, Michael A. (September 12, 1990)."Md. Senate's anti-abortion bloc apparently broken".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (January 6, 1991)."Assembly faces year of retrenchment, heavy issues".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Thompson, William (January 14, 1991)."Assembly leaders seek to head off abortion filibuster".The Evening Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Roll, John (February 8, 1991)."Abortion debate begins anew in Senate today".Carroll County Times.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy; Frece, John W. (February 9, 1991)."Abortion bill clears hurdles in Md. Senate".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion bill signed".The Star Democrat.February 19, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^ab"Group plans to launch abortion petition drive".Carroll County Times.March 28, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Miller, Amy L. (June 5, 1991)."Signatures sought for referendum".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023.
- ^Thompson, William (February 19, 1991)."Abortion foes taking steps to fight back".The Evening Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion law faces ballot test".The Evening Sun.July 23, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Opponents, supports of abortion law plan for referendum campaign".Carroll County Times.June 28, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Stuckey, Tom (October 27, 1992)."$3 million raised for abortion law campaign".The Daily Times.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (September 22, 1992)."Abortion issue heads to airwaves".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion".The Baltimore Sun.September 30, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
Dr. Ben Carson, Hopkins pediatric neurosurgeon: "As a physician who does not believe in abortion, when faced with a patient who has severe medical problems, I would refer someone for an abortion."
- ^abSmith, C. Fraser (November 3, 1992)."Abortion question, tax issues expected to turn out the vote".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (October 2, 1992)."Hopkins doctor disavows ad against abortion law".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 19,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Smith, C. Fraser (August 18, 1992)."Abortion strains unity of state GOP".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (June 30, 1992)."In Maryland, referendum looms large".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^abcd"Abortion".The Baltimore Sun.October 27, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion foe disparages back-alley death 'myth'".The Baltimore Sun.October 15, 1992.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Sarris, Marina (October 28, 1992)."Hillary Clinton pushes her husband's economic plan at rally in Annapolis".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (October 30, 1992)."State health secretary urges OK of abortion law".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (July 1, 1992)."Abortion-rights rally in city kicks off next campaign".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 18,2023.
- ^"Anti-abortion activists pressing for referendum".The Baltimore Sun.June 5, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Freeman, Freda (September 30, 1992)."Question 6 roils waters on abortion issue".The Aegis.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (October 23, 1991)."Both sides in Md. cheered by Pa. abortion decision".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Banisky, Sandy (January 27, 1992)."Schmoke to campaign for abortion rights bill".The Evening Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Gloria Steinem backs new abortion law".The Baltimore Sun.October 2, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Blomquist, Brian (July 24, 1991)."Signatures collected put abortion law on ballot".The Star Democrat.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"League of Women Voters raps abortion question ruling".The Daily Times.August 19, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^ab"A new abortion law".The Daily Times.February 20, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion foes plan drive to overturn new law in ballot".The Baltimore Sun.March 9, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"The Sun's Endorsements".The Baltimore Sun.October 25, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Times Endorsements".The Daily Times.October 25, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"A vote for Question 6 is a vote for choice".The Star Democrat.October 27, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion petition drive begins".The Daily Times.April 7, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^Hare, Mary Gail (February 27, 1991)."Center helps pregnant women".The Baltimore Sun.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion foes call themselves feminists".The Star Democrat.September 11, 1992.RetrievedNovember 18,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^"Abortion Issue Takes New Course in New Year".The Baltimore Sun.February 24, 1991.RetrievedNovember 17,2023– viaNewspapers.
- ^George Washington University
- ^Mason-Dixon Research
- ^Mason-Dixon Research
- ^Mason-Dixon Research
- ^KPC Research