Jump to content

Archaeplastida

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archaeplastida
Conifertrees,grasses,algae,andshrubsin and aroundSprague River, Oregon
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Clade: Diaphoretickes
(unranked): Archaeplastida
Adlet al.,2005[1]
Subgroups
Synonyms
  • PlantaeCavalier-Smith, 1981[4]
  • PrimoplastobiotaReviers, 2002[citation needed]
  • PrimoplantaePalmer et al. 2004[5]

TheArchaeplastida(or kingdomPlantaesensu lato"in a broad sense"; pronounced/ɑːrkɪˈplæstɪdə/) are a major group ofeukaryotes,comprising thephotoautotrophicred algae(Rhodophyta),green algae,land plants,and the minor groupglaucophytes.[6]It also includes the non-photosynthetic lineageRhodelphidia,a predatorial (eukaryotrophic) flagellate that is sister to the Rhodophyta, and probably the microscopicpicozoans.[7]The Archaeplastida havechloroplaststhat are surrounded by two membranes, suggesting that they were acquired directly through a singleendosymbiosisevent byphagocytosisof acyanobacterium.[8]All other groups which have chloroplasts, besides the amoeboid genusPaulinella,have chloroplasts surrounded by three or four membranes, suggesting they were acquired secondarily from red or green algae.[note 1]Unlike red and green algae, glaucophytes have never been involved in secondary endosymbiosis events.[10]

The cells of the Archaeplastida typically lackcentriolesand havemitochondriawith flatcristae.They usually have acell wallthat containscellulose,and food is stored in the form ofstarch.However, these characteristics are also shared with other eukaryotes. The main evidence that the Archaeplastida form amonophyleticgroup comes from genetic studies, which indicate theirplastidsprobably had a single origin. This evidence is disputed.[11][12]Based on the evidence to date, it is not possible to confirm or refute alternative evolutionary scenarios to a singleprimary endosymbiosis.[13]Photosynthetic organisms with plastids of different origin (such asbrown algae) do not belong to the Archaeplastida.

The archaeplastidans fall into two main evolutionary lines. The red algae are pigmented withchlorophyllaandphycobiliproteins,like most cyanobacteria, and accumulate starch outside the chloroplasts. The green algae and land plants – together known asViridiplantae(Latin for "green plants" ) or Chloroplastida – are pigmented with chlorophyllsaandb,but lack phycobiliproteins, and starch is accumulated inside the chloroplasts.[14]The glaucophytes have typical cyanobacterial pigments, but their plastids (called cyanelles) differ in having a peptidoglycan outer layer.[1]

Archaeplastida should not be confused with the older and obsolete name Archiplastideae, which refers tocyanobacteriaand other groups of bacteria.[15][16]

Taxonomy[edit]

See also:Eukaryote § Phylogeny

The consensus in 2005, when the group consisting of the glaucophytes and red and green algae and land plants was named 'Archaeplastida',[1]was that it was aclade,i.e. wasmonophyletic.Many studies published since then have provided evidence in agreement.[17][18][19][20]Other studies, though, have suggested that the group isparaphyletic.[21][22][23][12][24]To date, the situation appears unresolved, but a strong signal for Plantae (Archaeplastida) monophyly has been demonstrated in a recent study (with an enrichment of red algal genes).[25]The assumption made here is that Archaeplastida is a valid clade.

Various names have been given to the group. Some authors have simply referred to the group as plants or Plantae.[26][27]However, the name Plantae is ambiguous, since it has also been applied to less inclusiveclades,such asViridiplantaeandembryophytes.To distinguish, the larger group is sometimes known as Plantaesensu lato( "plants in the broad sense" ).

To avoid ambiguity, other names have been proposed. Primoplantae, which appeared in 2004, seems to be the first new name suggested for this group.[5]Another name applied to this node is Plastida, defined as the clade sharing "plastids of primary (direct prokaryote) origin [as] inMagnolia virginianaLinnaeus 1753 ".[28]

Although many studies have suggested the Archaeplastida form amonophyleticgroup,[29]a 2009 paper argues that they are in factparaphyletic.[23]The enrichment of novel red algal genes in a recent study demonstrates a strong signal for Plantae (Archaeplastida) monophyly and an equally strong signal of gene sharing history between the red/green algae and other lineages.[25]This study provides insight on how rich mesophilic red algal gene data are crucial for testing controversial issues in eukaryote evolution and for understanding the complex patterns of gene inheritance in protists.

The name Archaeplastida was proposed in 2005 by a large international group of authors (Adlet al.), who aimed to produce a classification for theeukaryoteswhich took into account morphology, biochemistry, and phylogenetics, and which had "some stability in the near term." They rejected the use of formal taxonomic ranks in favour of a hierarchical arrangement where the clade names do not signify rank. Thus, the phylum name 'Glaucophyta' and the class name 'Rhodophyceae' appear at the same level in their classification. The divisions proposed for the Archaeplastida are shown below in both tabular anddiagrammatic form.[1]

Archaeplastida:

TheglaucophyteGlaucocystis
  • GlaucophytaSkuja, 1954(GlaucocystophytaKies & Kremer, 1986) – glaucophytes
  • Glaucophytes are a small group of freshwater single-celled algae. Their chloroplasts, calledcyanelles,have apeptidoglycanlayer, making them more similar to cyanobacteria than those of the remaining Archaeplastida.
TherhodophyteLaurencia
  • RhodophyceaeThuret, 1855, emend. Rabenhorst, 1863, emend. Adlet al.,2005(RhodophytaWettstein 1901) – red algae
Red algae form one of the largest groups of algae. Most are seaweeds, being multicellular and marine. Their red colour comes fromphycobiliproteins,used asaccessory pigmentsin light capture for photosynthesis.
  • ChloroplastidaAdlet al.,2005(ViridiplantaeCavalier-Smith 1981;ChlorobiontaJeffrey 1982, emend. Bremer 1985, emend. Lewis and McCourt 2004;ChlorobiotaKendrick and Crane 1997)
Chloroplastida is the term chosen by Adlet al.for the group made up of the green algae and land plants (embryophytes). Except where lost secondarily, all have chloroplasts without a peptidoglycan layer and lack phycobiliproteins.
ThechlorophyteStigeoclonium
  • ChlorophytaPascher, 1914, emend. Lewis & McCourt, 2004– green algae (part)
Adl et al. employ a narrow definition of the Chlorophyta; other sources include the Chlorodendrales and Prasinophytae, which may themselves be combined.
  • ChlorodendralesFritsch, 1917– green algae (part)
  • PrasinophytaeCavalier-Smith, 1998, emend. Lewis & McCourt, 2004– green algae (part)
  • MesostigmaLauterborn, 1894, emend. McCourtinAdlet al.,2005(MesostigmataTurmel, Otis, and Lemieux 2002)
  • CharophytaKarolet al.,2001, emend. Lewis & McCourt, 2004(CharophyceaeSmith 1938, emend. Mattox and Stewart 1984) – green algae (part) and land plants
Charophytasensu lato,as used by Adlet al.,is a monophyletic group which is made up of some green algae, including the stoneworts (Charophytasensu stricto), as well as the land plants (embryophytes).
  • Sub-divisions other than Streptophytina (below) were not given by Adl et al.
Other sources would include the green algal groupsChlorokybales,Klebsormidiales,ZygnematalesandColeochaetales.[30]
  • CharalesLindley 1836(CharophytaeEngler, 1887) – stoneworts
  • PlantaeHaeckel 1866(CormophytaEndlicher, 1836;EmbryophytaEndlicher, 1836, emend. Lewis & McCourt, 2004) – land plants (embryophytes)

External phylogeny[edit]

Below is a consensus reconstruction of the relationships of Archaeplastida with its nearest neighbours, mainly based on molecular data.[31][32][33][34]

Diaphoretickes

There has been disagreement near the Archaeplastida root, e.g. whether Cryptista emerged within the Archaeplastida. In 2014 a thorough review was published on these inconsistencies.[35]The position ofTelonemiaandPicozoaare not clear. Also Hacrobia (Haptista + Cryptista) may be completely associated with the SAR clade. The SAR are often seen as eukaryote-eukaryote hybrids, contributing to the confusion in the genetic analyses. A sister ofGloeomargarita lithophorahas been engulfed by an ancestor of the Archaeplastida, leading to theplastidswhich are living in permanent endosymbiosis in most of the descendant lineages. Because both Gloeomargarita and related cyanobacteria, in addition to the most primitive archaeplastids, all live in freshwater, it seems the Archaeplastida originated in freshwater, and only colonized the oceans in the late Proterozoic.[36][37]

Internal phylogeny[edit]

In 2019, a phylogeny of the Archaeplastida based on genomes and transcriptomes from 1,153 plant species was proposed.[38]The placing of algal groups is supported by phylogenies based on genomes from the Mesostigmatophyceae and Chlorokybophyceae that have since been sequenced. Both the "chlorophyte algae" and the "streptophyte algae" are treated as paraphyletic (vertical bars beside phylogenetic tree diagram) in this analysis.[39][40]The classification of Bryophyta is supported both by Putticket al.2018,[41]and by phylogenies involving the hornwort genomes that have also since been sequenced.[42][43]

Archaeplastida
"chlorophyte algae"
"streptophyte algae"

Recent work on non-photosynthetic algae placesRhodelphidiaas sister to Rhodophyta or to Glaucophyta and Viridiplantae;[44][45]andPicozoasister to that pair of groups.[46]

Morphology[edit]

All archaeplastidans have plastids (chloroplasts) that carry out photosynthesis and are believed to be derived from endosymbiotic cyanobacteria. In glaucophytes, perhaps the most primitive members of the group, the chloroplast is called acyanelleand shares several features with cyanobacteria, including a peptidoglycan cell wall, that are not retained in other members of the group. The resemblance of cyanelles to cyanobacteria supports theendosymbiotic theory.

The cells of most archaeplastidans have walls, commonly but not always made of cellulose.[citation needed]

The Archaeplastida vary widely in the degree of their cell organization, from isolated cells to filaments to colonies to multi-celled organisms. The earliest were unicellular, and many groups remain so today. Multicellularity evolved separately in several groups, including red algae,ulvophyte green algae,and in the green algae that gave rise tostonewortsand land plants.

Endosymbiosis[edit]

Main article:Endosymbiotic theory

Because the ancestral archaeplastidan is hypothesized to have acquired its chloroplasts directly by engulfing cyanobacteria, the event is known as aprimary endosymbiosis(as reflected in the name chosen for the group 'Archaeplastida' i.e. 'ancient plastid'). In 2013 it was discovered that one species of green algae,Cymbomonas tetramitiformisin the orderPyramimonadales,is amixotrophand able to support itself through bothphagotrophyandphototrophy.It is not yet known if this is a primitive trait and therefore defines the last common ancestor of Archaeplastida, which could explain how it obtained its chloroplasts, or if it is a trait regained byhorizontal gene transfer.[47]Since then more species of mixotrophic green algae, such asPyramimonas tychotretaandMantoniella antarctica,has been found.[48]

Evidence for primary endosymbiosis includes the presence of a double membrane around the chloroplasts; one membrane belonged to the bacterium, and the other to the eukaryote that captured it. Over time, many genes from the chloroplast have been transferred to the nucleus of the host cell through endosymbiotic gene transfer (EGT). It is estimated that 6–20% of the archaeplastidan genome consist of genes transferred from the endosymbiont.[49]The presence of such genes in the nuclei of eukaryotes without chloroplasts suggests this transfer happened early in the evolution of the group.[50]

Other eukaryotes with chloroplasts appear to have gained them by engulfing a single-celled archaeplastidan with its own bacterially-derived chloroplasts. Because these events involve endosymbiosis of cells that have their own endosymbionts, the process is calledsecondary endosymbiosis.The chloroplasts of such eukaryotes are typically surrounded by more than two membranes, reflecting a history of multiple engulfment. The chloroplasts ofeuglenids,chlorarachniophytesand a small group ofdinoflagellatesappear to be captured green algae,[51]whereas those of the remaining photosynthetic eukaryotes, such asheterokontalgae,cryptophytes,haptophytes,and dinoflagellates, appear to be captured red algae.[52]

Fossil record[edit]

Perhaps the most ancient remains of Archaeplastida are putative red algae (Rafatazmia) withinstromatolitesin 1600 Ma (million years ago) rocks in India,[53]as well as possible alga fossils (Tuanshanzia) from China's Gaoyuzhuang Biota of a similar age.[54]Somewhat more recent aremicrofossilsfrom the Roper group in northern Australia. The structure of these single-celled fossils resembles that of modern green algae. They date to theMesoproterozoicEra, about 1500 to 1300 Ma.[55]These fossils are consistent with amolecular clockstudy that calculated that this clade diverged about 1500 Ma.[56]The oldest fossil that can be assigned to a specific modern group is the red algaBangiomorpha,from 1200 Ma.[57]

In the lateNeoproterozoicEra, algal fossils became more numerous and diverse. Eventually, in thePaleozoicEra, plants emerged onto land, and have continued to flourish up to the present.

Notes[edit]

  1. ^The exceptional two plastid membranes of thestramenopilealgaChrysoparadoxaare probably the result of secondary reduction.[9]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcdAdl, S.M.; et al. (2005)."The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists".Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.52(5): 399–451.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x.PMID16248873.S2CID8060916.
  2. ^abYazaki, Euki; Yabuki, Akinori; Imaizumi, Ayaka; Kume, Keitaro; Hashimoto, Tetsuo; Inagaki, Yuji (31 August 2021). "Phylogenomics invokes the clade housing Cryptista, Archaeplastida, andMicroheliella maris".bioRxiv10.1101/2021.08.29.458128.
  3. ^Schön, M.E.; Zlatogursky, V.V.; Singh, R.P.; et al. (17 November 2021)."Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae".Nature Communications.12: 6651 (1): 6651.Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.6651S.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26918-0.ISSN2041-1723.PMC8599508.PMID34789758.
  4. ^Cavalier-Smith, T. (1981). "Eukaryote Kingdoms: Seven or Nine?"".BioSystems.14(3–4): 461–481.Bibcode:1981BiSys..14..461C.doi:10.1016/0303-2647(81)90050-2.PMID7337818.
  5. ^abPalmer, Jeffrey D.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Chase, Mark W. (2004)."The plant tree of life: an overview and some points of view".American Journal of Botany.91(10): 1437–1445.doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1437.PMID21652302.
  6. ^Ball, S.; Colleoni, C. (January 2011)."The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis".Journal of Experimental Botany.62(6). Cenci, U.; Raj, J.N.; Tirtiaux, C.: 1775–1801.doi:10.1093/jxb/erq411.PMID21220783.
  7. ^Picozoans Are Algae After All: Study | The Scientist Magazine®
  8. ^Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences; Tikhonenkov, Denis V. (2020)."Predatory flagellates – the new recently discovered deep branches of the eukaryotic tree and their evolutionary and ecological significance"(PDF).Protistology.14(1).doi:10.21685/1680-0826-2020-14-1-2.
  9. ^Wetherbee, Richard; Jackson, Christopher J.; Repetti, Sonja I.; Clementson, Lesley A.; Costa, Joana F.; van de Meene, Allison; Crawford, Simon; Verbruggen, Heroen (9 December 2018). "The golden paradox – a new heterokont lineage with chloroplasts surrounded by two membranes".Journal of Phycology.22(2): 257–278.doi:10.1111/jpy.12822.hdl:11343/233613.PMID30536815.S2CID54477112.
  10. ^Handbook of Marine Microalgae: Biotechnology Advances
  11. ^Parfrey. L. W.; Barbero, E.; Lasser, E; et al. (December 2006)."Evaluating support for the current classification of eukaryotic diversity".PLOS Genetics.2(12): e220.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020220.PMC1713255.PMID17194223.
  12. ^abKim, E; Graham, L. E. (July 2008). Redfield, Rosemary Jeanne (ed.)."EEF2 analysis challenges the monophyly of Archaeplastida and Chromalveolata".PLOS ONE.3(7): e2621.Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.2621K.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002621.PMC2440802.PMID18612431.
  13. ^Mackiewicz, P.; Gagat, P. (2014)."Monophyly of Archaeplastida supergroup and relationships among its lineages in the light of phylogenetic and phylogenomic studies. Are we close to a consensus?".Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae.83(4): 263–280.doi:10.5586/asbp.2014.044.
  14. ^Viola, R.; Nyvall, P.; Pedersén, M. (2001)."The unique features of starch metabolism in red algae".Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.268(1474): 1417–1422.doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1644.PMC1088757.PMID11429143.
  15. ^Copeland, H. F. (1956).The Classification of Lower Organisms.Palo Alto: Pacific Books, p. 29,[1].
  16. ^Bessey, C. E. (1907)."A Synopsis of Plant Phyla".Univ. Nebraska Studies.7:275–358.
  17. ^Burki, Fabien; Kamran Shalchian-Tabrizi; Marianne Minge; Åsmund Skjæveland; Sergey I. Nikolaev; Kjetill S. Jakobsen; Jan Pawlowski (2007). Butler, Geraldine (ed.)."Phylogenomics Reshuffles the Eukaryotic Supergroups".PLOS ONE.2(8): e790.Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..790B.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000790.PMC1949142.PMID17726520.
  18. ^Burki, F.; Inagaki, Y.; Brate, J.; Archibald, J. M.; Keeling, P. J.; Cavalier-Smith, T.; et al. (2009)."Large-Scale Phylogenomic Analyses Reveal That Two Enigmatic Protist Lineages, Telonemia and Centroheliozoa, Are Related to Photosynthetic Chromalveolates".Genome Biology and Evolution.1:231–238.doi:10.1093/gbe/evp022.PMC2817417.PMID20333193.
  19. ^Cavalier-Smith, Thomas(2009)."Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree".Biology Letters.6(3): 342–345.doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948.PMC2880060.PMID20031978.
  20. ^Rogozin, I. B.; Basu, M. K.; Csürös, M. & Koonin, E. V. (2009)."Analysis of Rare Genomic Changes Does Not Support the Unikont–Bikont Phylogeny and Suggests Cyanobacterial Symbiosis as the Point of Primary Radiation of Eukaryotes".Genome Biology and Evolution.1:99–113.doi:10.1093/gbe/evp011.PMC2817406.PMID20333181.
  21. ^Baldauf, Sandra L.; Roger, A. J.; Wenk-Siefert, I.; Doolittle, W. F. (2000). "A Kingdom-Level Phylogeny of Eukaryotes Based on Combined Protein Data".Science.290(5493): 972–977.Bibcode:2000Sci...290..972B.doi:10.1126/science.290.5493.972.PMID11062127.
  22. ^Lipscomb, Diana. 1991. Broad classification: the kingdoms and the protozoa. In: Parasitic Protozoa, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., J.P. Kreier, J.R. Baker (eds.), pp. 81-136. Academic Press, San Diego.
  23. ^abNozaki, H.; Maruyama, S.; Matsuzaki, M.; Nakada, T.; Kato, S.; Misawa, K. (December 2009). "Phylogenetic positions of Glaucophyta, green plants (Archaeplastida) and Haptophyta (Chromalveolata) as deduced from slowly evolving nuclear genes".Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.53(3): 872–80.doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.015.PMID19698794.
  24. ^Palmgren M, Sørensen DM, Hallström BM, Säll T, Broberg K (August 2019)."Evolution of P2A and P5A ATPases: ancient gene duplications and the red algal connection to green plants revisited".Physiol. Plant.168(3): 630–647.doi:10.1111/ppl.13008.PMC7065118.PMID31268560.{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^abChan, C. X.; Yang, E. C.; Banerjee, T.; Yoon, H. S.; Martone, P. T.; Estevez, J. M.; Bhattacharya, D. (2011)."Red and green algal monophyly and extensive gene sharing found in a rich repertoire of red algal genes".Current Biology.21(4): 328–333.Bibcode:2011CBio...21..328C.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.037.PMID21315598.S2CID7162977.
  26. ^T. Cavalier-Smith (1981). "Eukaryote Kingdoms: Seven or Nine?".BioSystems.14(3–4): 461–481.Bibcode:1981BiSys..14..461C.doi:10.1016/0303-2647(81)90050-2.PMID7337818.
  27. ^Bhattacharya, Debashish; Yoon, Hwan Su; Hackett, Jeremiah (2003). "Photosynthetic eukaryotes unite: endosymbiosis connects the dots".BioEssays.26(1): 50–60.doi:10.1002/bies.10376.PMID14696040.
  28. ^Simpson, A. G. B. (2004). "Highest-level taxa within Eukaryotes".First International Phylogenetic Nomenclature Meeting. Paris, July 6–9.
  29. ^Vinogradov S. N.; Fernández, I.; Hoogewijs, D.; Arredondo-Peter, R. (October 2010)."Phylogenetic Relationships of 3/3 and 2/2 Hemoglobins in Archaeplastida Genomes to Bacterial and Other Eukaryote Hemoglobins".Molecular Plant.4(1): 42–58.doi:10.1093/mp/ssq040.PMID20952597.
  30. ^Turmel, M.; Otis, C.; Lemieux, C. (2005)."The complete chloroplast DNA sequences of the charophycean green algaeStaurastrumandZygnemareveal that the chloroplast genome underwent extensive changes during the evolution of the Zygnematales ".BMC Biology.3:22.doi:10.1186/1741-7007-3-22.PMC1277820.PMID16236178.
  31. ^Leliaert, Frederik; Smith, David R.; Moreau, Hervé; Herron, Matthew D.; Verbruggen, Heroen; Delwiche, Charles F.; De Clerck, Olivier (2012)."Phylogeny and Molecular Evolution of the Green Algae"(PDF).Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences.31(1): 1–46.Bibcode:2012CRvPS..31....1L.doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.615705.S2CID17603352.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2015-09-24.Retrieved2017-10-15.
  32. ^Cook, Martha E.; Graham, Linda E. (2017). "Chlorokybophyceae, Klebsormidiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.).Handbook of the Protists.Springer International Publishing. pp. 185–204.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_36.ISBN9783319281476.
  33. ^Lewis, Louise A.; McCourt, Richard M. (2004). "Green algae and the origin of land plants".American Journal of Botany.91(10): 1535–1556.doi:10.3732/ajb.91.10.1535.PMID21652308.
  34. ^Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Bass, David; Bowser, Samuel S.; Brown, Matthew W.; Burki, Fabien; Dunthorn, Micah (2012-09-01)."The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes".Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology.59(5): 429–514.doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x.PMC3483872.PMID23020233.
  35. ^Mackiewicz, Paweł; Gagat, Przemysław (2014-12-31)."Monophyly of Archaeplastida supergroup and relationships among its lineages in the light of phylogenetic and phylogenomic studies. Are we close to a consensus?".Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae.83(4): 263–280.doi:10.5586/asbp.2014.044.
  36. ^de Vries, Jan; Archibald, John M. (2017)."Endosymbiosis: Did Plastids Evolve from a Freshwater Cyanobacterium?".Current Biology.27(3): R103–R105.Bibcode:2017CBio...27.R103D.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.006.PMID28171752.
  37. ^Lewis, L. A. (2017)."Hold the salt: Freshwater origin of primary plastids".PNAS.114(37): 9759–9760.Bibcode:2017PNAS..114.9759L.doi:10.1073/pnas.1712956114.PMC5604047.PMID28860199.
  38. ^Leebens-Mack, M.; Barker, M.; Carpenter, E.; et al. (2019)."One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants".Nature.574(7780): 679–685.doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2.PMC6872490.PMID31645766.
  39. ^Liang, Zhe; et al. (2019)."Mesostigma viride Genome and Transcriptome Provide Insights into the Origin and Evolution of Streptophyta".Advanced Science.7(1): 1901850.doi:10.1002/advs.201901850.PMC6947507.PMID31921561.
  40. ^Wang, Sibo; et al. (2020)."Genomes of early-diverging streptophyte algae shed light on plant terrestrialization".Nature Plants.6(2): 95–106.doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0560-3.PMC7027972.PMID31844283.
  41. ^Puttick, Mark; et al. (2018)."The Interrelationships of Land Plants and the Nature of the Ancestral Embryophyte".Current Biology.28(5): 733–745.Bibcode:2018CBio...28E.733P.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.063.hdl:1983/ad32d4da-6cb3-4ed6-add2-2415f81b46da.PMID29456145.
  42. ^Zhang, Jian; et al. (2020)."The hornwort genome and early land plant evolution".Nature Plants.6(2): 107–118.doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0588-4.PMC7027989.PMID32042158.
  43. ^Li, Fay Wei; et al. (2020)."Anthoceros genomes illuminate the origin of land plants and the unique biology of hornworts".Nature Plants.6(3): 259–272.doi:10.1038/s41477-020-0618-2.PMC8075897.PMID32170292.
  44. ^Gawryluk, Ryan M. R.; Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Hehenberger, Elisabeth; Husnik, Filip; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Keeling, Patrick J. (17 July 2019). "Non-photosynthetic predators are sister to red algae".Nature.572(7768): 240–243.doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1398-6.PMID31316212.S2CID197542583.
  45. ^Novak, Lukas V. F.; Muñoz-Gómez, Sergio A.; Beveren, Fabian van; Ciobanu, Maria; Eme, Laura; López-García, Purificación; Moreira, David (2024-03-11),Nucleomorph phylogenomics suggests a deep and ancient origin of cryptophyte plastids within Rhodophyta,doi:10.1101/2024.03.10.584144,retrieved2024-06-08
  46. ^Schön, Max E.; Zlatogursky, Vasily V.; Singh, Rohan P.; Poirier, Camille; Wilken, Susanne; Mathur, Varsha; Strassert, Jürgen F. H.; Pinhassi, Jarone; Worden, Alexandra Z.; Keeling, Patrick J.; Ettema, Thijs J. G.; Wideman, Jeremy G.; Burki, Fabien (17 November 2021)."Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae".Nature Communications.12(1): 6651.Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.6651S.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26918-0.PMC8599508.PMID34789758.
  47. ^Raven, John A. (2013)."Cells inside Cells: Symbiosis and Continuing Phagotrophy".Current Biology.23(12): R530–R531.Bibcode:2013CBio...23.R530R.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.006.PMID23787050.
  48. ^Bock, Nicholas A.; Charvet, Sophie; Burns, John; Gyaltshen, Yangtsho; Rozenberg, Andrey; Duhamel, Solange; Kim, Eunsoo (2021)."Experimental identification and in silico prediction of bacterivory in green algae".The ISME Journal.15(7): 1987–2000.Bibcode:2021ISMEJ..15.1987B.doi:10.1038/s41396-021-00899-w.PMC8245530.PMID33649548.
  49. ^Qiu, Huan; Yoon, Hwan Su; Bhattacharya, Debashish (2013)."Algal endosymbionts as vectors of horizontal gene transfer in photosynthetic eukaryotes".Frontiers in Plant Science.4:366.doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00366.PMC3777023.PMID24065973.
  50. ^Andersson, Jan O.; Roger, Andrew J. (2002)."A cyanobacterial gene in non-photosynthetic protists – an early chloroplast acquisition in eukaryotes?".Current Biology.12(2): 115–119.Bibcode:2002CBio...12..115A.doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00649-2.PMID11818061.S2CID18809784.
  51. ^Keeling, Patrick J. (2010)."The endosymbiotic origin, diversification and fate of plastids".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.365(1541): 729–748.doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0103.PMC2817223.PMID20124341.
  52. ^Stadnichuk, I.N.; Kusnetsov, V.V. (2021). "Endosymbiotic Origin of Chloroplasts in Plant Cells' Evolution".Russian Journal of Plant Physiology.68(1): 1–16.doi:10.1134/S1021443721010179.S2CID255012748.
  53. ^Bengtson, Stefan; Sallstedt, Therese; Belivanova, Veneta; Whitehouse, Martin (2017)."Three-dimensional preservation of cellular and subcellular structures suggests 1.6 billion-year-old crown-group red algae".PLOS Biology.15(3): e2000735.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2000735.PMC5349422.PMID28291791.
  54. ^Chen, K.; Miao, L.; Zhao, F.; Zhu, M. (2023). "Carbonaceous macrofossils from the early Mesoproterozoic Gaoyuzhuang Formation in the Yanshan Range, North China".Precambrian Research.392.107074.Bibcode:2023PreR..39207074C.doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2023.107074.
  55. ^Javaux, Emmanuelle J.; Knoll, Andrew H.; Walter, Malcolm R. (2004). "TEM evidence for eukaryotic diversity in mid-Proterozoic oceans".Geobiology.2(3): 121–132.Bibcode:2004Gbio....2..121J.doi:10.1111/j.1472-4677.2004.00027.x.S2CID53600639.
  56. ^Yoon, Hwan Su; Hackett, Jeremiah D.; Ciniglia, Claudia; Pinto, Gabriele; Bhattacharya, Debashish (2004)."A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes".Molecular Biology and Evolution.21(5): 809–818.doi:10.1093/molbev/msh075.PMID14963099.
  57. ^Butterfield, Nicholas J. (2000). "Bangiomorpha pubescensn. gen., n. sp.: implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes ".Paleobiology.26(3): 386–404.Bibcode:2000Pbio...26..386B.doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0386:BPNGNS>2.0.CO;2.S2CID36648568.

External links[edit]

Wikispecieshas information related toArchaeplastida.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Archaeplastida&oldid=1233779115"