Jump to content

Ariane 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ariane 4
The 52nd Ariane 4 carrying theTOPEX/Poseidonsatellite.
FunctionExpendablelaunch vehicle
ManufacturerArianeGroup
Country of originEurope
Size
Height58.72 m (192.7 ft)
Diameter3.8 m (12 ft)
Mass240,000–470,000 kg (530,000–1,040,000 lb)
Stages3[1]
Capacity
Payload toLEO[altitude and inclination needed]
Mass5,000–7,600 kg (11,000–16,800 lb)
Payload toGTO
Mass2,000–4,300 kg (4,400–9,500 lb)
Launch history
StatusRetired
Launch sitesKourou,ELA-2
Total launches116
(40:7,42P:15,42L:13)
(44P:15,44LP:26,44L:40)
Success(es)113
(40:7,42P:14,42L:13)
(44P:15,44LP:25,44L:39)
Failure(s)3 (42P:1,44L:1,44LP:1)
First flight
  • 40:22 January 1990
  • 42P:20 November 1990
  • 42L:12 May 1993
  • 44P:4 April 1991
  • 44LP:15 June 1988
  • 44L:5 June 1989
Last flight
  • 40:3 December 1999
  • 42P:4 May 2002
  • 42L:23 January 2002
  • 44P:25 September 2001
  • 44LP:27 November 2001
  • 44L:15 February 2003
Boosters (Ariane 42L, 44LP or 44L) – PAL
No. boosters0, 2 or 4
Powered byViking 6
Maximum thrust752.003 kN (169,057 lbf)
Specific impulse278 seconds
Burn time142 seconds
PropellantN2O4/UDMH
Boosters (Ariane 42P, 44LP or 44P) – PAP
No. boosters0, 2 or 4
Maximum thrust650 kN (150,000 lbf)
Burn time33 seconds
PropellantCTPB 1613
First stage – L220
Powered by4Viking 5C
Maximum thrust3,034.1 kN (682,100 lbf)
Specific impulse278 seconds
Burn time205 seconds
PropellantN2O4/UDMH
Second stage – L33
Powered by1Viking 4B
Maximum thrust720.965 kN (162,079 lbf)
Specific impulse296 seconds
Burn time132 seconds
PropellantN2O4/UDMH
Third stage – H10
Powered by1HM7-B
Maximum thrust62.703 kN (14,096 lbf)
Specific impulse446 seconds
Burn time759 seconds
PropellantLH2/LOX

TheAriane 4was a Europeanexpendablelaunch vehicle,developed by theCentre national d'études spatiales(CNES), theFrenchspace agency, for theEuropean Space Agency(ESA). It was manufactured byArianeGroupand marketed byArianespace.Since its first flight on 15 June 1988 until the final flight on 15 February 2003, it attained 113 successful launches out of 116 total launches.

In 1982, the Ariane 4 program was approved by ESA. Drawing heavily upon the precedingAriane 3,it was designed to provide a launcher capable of delivering heavier payloads and at a lower cost per kilogram than the earlier members of the Ariane family. The Ariane 4 was principally an evolution of the existing technologies used, as opposed to being revolutionary in its design ethos; this approach quickly gained the backing of most ESA members, who funded and participated in its development and operation. Capable of being equipped with a wide variety ofstrap-on boosters,the Ariane 4 gained a reputation for being an extremely versatile launcher.

Once in service, the launcher soon became recognized for being ideal for launching communications andEarth observation satellites,as well as those used for scientific research. During its working life, the Ariane 4 managed to capture 50% of the market in launching commercial satellites, soundly demonstrating Europe's ability to compete in the commercial launch sector.[2]In February 2003, the final Ariane 4 was launched; Arianespace had decided to retire the type in favour of the newer and largerAriane 5,which effectively replaced it in service.

Development[edit]

Origins[edit]

In 1973, eleven nations decided to pursue joint collaboration in the field of space exploration and formed a new pan-national organisation to undertake this mission, theEuropean Space Agency(ESA).[3]: 161–162 Six years later, in December 1979, the arrival of a capable Europeanexpendable launch systemwas marked when the firstAriane 1launcher was successfully launched from theCentre Spatial Guyanais(CSG) atKourou,French Guiana.[3]: 169 The Ariane 1 soon became considered to be a capable and competitive launcher in comparison to rival platforms offered by theSoviet Unionand theUnited States of America,and it was quickly followed by improved derivatives in the form of theAriane 2andAriane 3.By early 1986, the Ariane 1, along with the Ariane 2 and Ariane 3, had become the dominant launcher on the world market.[3]: 172 

In January 1982, the ESA issued its authorisation for the development and construction of the Ariane 4; the development programme had the stated objective of increasing the usable payload by 90%.[4]The Ariane 4 would be a considerably larger and more flexible launcher that the earlier members of its family, being intended to compete with the upper end of launchers worldwide. In comparison, while the Ariane 1 had a typical weight of 207 tonnes (456,000 lb) and could launch payloads of up to 1.7 tonnes (3,700 lb) into orbit; the larger Ariane 4 had a typical weight of 470 tonnes (1,040,000 lb) and could orbit payloads of up to 4.2 tonnes (9,300 lb).[3]: 178 Work on the Ariane 4 was substantially eased via drawing heavily on both the technology and experiences gained from producing and operating the earlier members of theAriane rocket.The total development cost for the Ariane 4 was valued at 476 millionEuropean Currency Units(ECU) in 1986.[4]

Posed with the requirement to produce a rocket with substantially greater thrust, the design team considered various approaches to achieve this.[3]: 179 One concept studied had involved the addition of a fifth engine to an enlarged first stage of the Ariane 3, but was found to involve a very high level of redesign work to achieve this; instead, the first stage was elongated to hold 210 tonnes (460,000 lb) of propellant instead of the 145 tonnes (320,000 lb) present on the Ariane 3. While the second and third stages remained identical to the Ariane 3, a range ofstrap-on boosterswere developed to be applied to the type, designed to gradually increase the rocket's payload capacity.[3]: 179 Overall, the Ariane 4 was 15% smaller than the Ariane 3.[3]: 180 

In effect, the Ariane 4 was an improved and developed derivative of the earlier Ariane 3, primarily differing through the application of varioussolid-fuelled andliquid-fuelled boosters, the latter being the only all-new design feature of the Ariane 4; at this point, the practice of using liquid boosters was uncommon, having only previously been used in theChinese space program.[3]: 179 Another innovation of the Ariane 4 was the dual-launch SPELDA (Structure Porteuse Externe de Lancement Double Ariane) fairing.[3]: 180 This had the function of allowing a pair of satellites, one placed on top of the other; several different SPELDA nose fairings could be installed, including normal and extended models. The SPELDA was considerably lighter than its predecessor; the guidance system also used much more accuratering laser gyroscopes.[3]: 180 According to aviation author Brian Harvey, the advances present in the design of the Ariane 4 represented a conservative and evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, philosophy.[3]: 180 

Teaming and construction[edit]

As the Ariane 4 programme took shape, it gained the support ofBelgium,Denmark,Spain,Ireland,Italy,theNetherlands,Germany,theUnited Kingdom,France,Sweden,andSwitzerland.[3]: 180 The main contractors wereAérospatiale(responsible for the first and second stages),Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm(MBB) (produced the liquid-fuelled boosters),Société Européenne de Propulsion(SEP) (engine manufacturer),Matra(equipment bay assembly),Air Liquide(production of third stage tanks and insulation),BPD Snia(maker of solid-fuelled boosters), andBritish Aerospace/Contraves Space AG(manufacturers of the fairing).[3]: 180 For their work on the Ariane 4, the Launch Team were subsequently awarded the Space Achievement Award by theSpace Foundationin 2004.[5]

In conjunction with the development of the Ariane 4 itself, a new purpose-built launch preparation area and launch pad for the rocket, collectively designated asELA-2,was constructed at theCentre Spatial Guyanaisto service the Ariane 4 and provide a launch rate of 8 launches per year (this feat was near-unprecedented for a single large rocket, other than within the Soviet Union).[3]: 178–179 Unlike the earlierELA-1which had been used for the previous members of the Ariane family and other rockets, preparation activity for the rocket would be performed in a purpose-built 80-metre (260 ft) tall hall rather than on the pad itself; the completed rocket was then transported using a specially-designed railway to slowly traverse from the hall to the launch pad, taking one hour. This railway provided the additional benefit of enabling faulty rockets to be withdrawn from the pad and be substituted for relatively quickly.[3]: 179 

On 15 June 1988, the first successful launch of the Ariane 4 was conducted.[3]: 180 For this first test flight, it was decided to fire the second most powerful version of the rocket, designated44LP,equipped with four main engines, two solid boosters and two liquid boosters; it was also furnished with the multi-satellite SPELDA fairing. 50 seconds after take-off, the solid boosters would be expended and be detached in order to reduce the rocket's weight.[3]: 180 143 seconds after take-off, the liquid boosters also detached, further lightening the vehicle. The maiden flight was considered a success, putting multiple satellites into orbit.[3]: 180 

Further development[edit]

For the V50 launch onwards, an improved third stage, known as theH10+,was adopted for the Ariane 4.[3]: 183 The H10+ third stage featured a new tank, which was 26 kg (57 lb) lighter, 32 cm (13 in) longer, and contained 340 kg (750 lb) more fuel, which raised the rocket's overall payload capacity by 110 kg (240 lb) and increased its burn time by 20 seconds.[3]: 183 

Even prior to the first flight of the Ariane 4, development of a successor, designated as theAriane 5,had already commenced.[3]: 184–185 In January 1985, the Ariane 5 had been officially adopted as an ESA programme. It lacked the high levels of commonality that the Ariane 4 had with its predecessors, and had been designed not only for launching heavier payloads of up to 5.2 tonnes (11,000 lb) and at a 20% cost reduction over the Ariane 4, but for a higher margin of safety due to the fact that the Ariane 5 was designed to conduct crewed space launches as well, being intended to transportastronautsusing the proposedHermes space vehicle.[3]: 185 Development of the Ariane 5 was not without controversy as some ESA members considered the more mature Ariane 4 to be more suited for meeting established needs for such launchers; it was for this reason that Britain chose not to participate in the Ariane 5 programme.[3]: 186 For some years, Ariane 4 and Ariane 5 launchers were operated interchangeably; however, it was eventually decided to terminate all Ariane 4 operations in favour of concentrating on the newer Ariane 5.[3]: 193 

Design[edit]

The Ariane 4 was the ultimate development from the preceding members of theAriane rocket family.Compared with theAriane 2andAriane 3,the Ariane 4 featured a stretched first (by 61%) and third stages, a strengthened structure, new propulsion bay layouts, new avionics, and the SPELDA (Structure Porteuse Externe de Lancement Double Ariane) dual-payload carrier. The basic 40 version did not employ any strap-on motors, while the Ariane 42L, 44L, 42P, 44P, and 44LP variants all used various combinations ofsolidandliquidboosters.Originally designed to place 2,000 to 4,200 kg (4,400 to 9,300 lb) payloads ingeostationary orbit,the six Ariane 4 variants, aided by strap-on boosters, enabled the launch of payloads in excess of 4,900 kg (10,800 lb) on several occasions. The Ariane 4 launcher reduced the launch costs per kilo by 55% in comparison to the originalAriane 1.[3]: 180 

The rocket was used in a number of variants - it could be fitted with two or four additionalsolid(PAP forPropulseurs d'Appoint à Poudre) orliquidfueled booster rockets (PAL forPropulseurs d'Appoint à Liquide). The launcher included a satellite payload carrier system calledSPELDA(Structure porteuse externe de lancement double Ariane,French forExternal Carrying Structure for Ariane Double Launches) for launching more than one satellite at a time. The rocket captured nearly 60% of the world's commercial launch services market, serving both European and international clients.[6]Atop the third stage was a vehicle equipment stage which housed a computer that performed various functions, including sequencing, guidance, control, tracking,telemetryand an explosive-based self-destruct.[3]: 180 

The Ariane 4 AR 40 was the basic version, with three stages: 58.4 m (192 ft) high, a diameter of 3.8 m (12 ft), a liftoff mass of 245,000 kg (540,000 lb) and a maximum payload of 2,100 kg (4,600 lb) to GTO or 5,000 kg (11,000 lb) tolow Earth orbit(LEO). Main power was provided by fourViking 2B motors,each producing 667 kN (150,000 lbf) of thrust. The second stage was powered by a single Viking 4B motor, and the third stage was equipped with anHM7-Bliquid oxygen/liquid hydrogen motor. The Ariane 4 AR 44L, which was outfitted with the maximum additional boost of four liquid fuel rocket strap-ons, was a four-stage rocket, weighing 470,000 kg (1,040,000 lb) and capable of transferring a payload of 4,730 kg (10,430 lb) to GTO, or alternatively 7,600 kg (16,800 lb) to LEO.

5 of the 6 versions of Ariane 4
Model PAL PAP Payload toGTO(kg) Launches Successes Failure date
AR 40 0 0 2100 7 7
AR 42P 0 2 2930 15 14 1 December 1994
AR 42L 2 0 3480 13 13
AR 44P 0 4 3460 15 15
AR 44LP 2 2 4220 26 25 24 January 1994
AR 44L 4 0 4720 40 39 22 February 1990

Operational history[edit]

In June 1988, the inaugural flight of the Ariane 4 occurred, which was a success. Since then, Ariane 4 has flown 116 times, 113 of which were successful, yielding a success rate of97.4%.

On 22 February 1990, the first failure occurred during the eighth Ariane 4 launch, flight V36. The rocket exploded 9 km above Kourou.[3]: 182–183 The failure occurred because a worker assembling aViking rocket motorhad left a handkerchief in one of the motor's coolant tubes. He had done so as a reminder to himself to inform his superior, as per procedure, of an unplanned polishing he had made to fit the tube. But he fell ill before he could do so and was replaced by other workers who did not notice the handkerchief. In flight, the handkerchief blocked the coolant tube, the motor overheated and failed, and the Ariane self-destructed after veering off its trajectory. Its payload, two communications satellites worth 500 million US dollars (Superbird-BandBS-2X) landed in pieces in the swamps near Kourou.[7]The ensuing investigation recommended 44 modifications, including numbering and checking all pieces of cloth used in the rocket's assembly.[7]The following 26 launches were all completed successfully.[3]: 183 

The system became the basis for Europeansatellitelaunches with a record of 113 successful and three launch failures. Ariane 4 provided a payload increase from 1,700 kg (3,700 lb) forAriane 3to a maximum of 4,800 kg (10,600 lb) togeostationary transfer orbit(GTO). The record for Ariane 4 to GTO was 4,946 kg (10,904 lb).[8]

On 15 February 2003, the final launch of Ariane 4 rocket occurred, placingIntelsat 907intogeosynchronous orbit.[9]Arianespace had decided to phase out the Ariane 4 launcher in favour of the newer heavy-liftAriane 5rocket, which had already been in service for some years. In 2011, the medium-liftSoyuz STcomplemented the offering of launch vehicles from theCentre Spatial Guyanais.Spacecraft launched by the Soyuz reused the payload platform and dispenser which had been originally designed for the Ariane.[10]

Comparable rockets[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Wade, Mark (ed.)."Ariane 4".Encyclopedia Astronautica.Archivedfrom the original on 28 December 2016.Retrieved22 June2021.
  2. ^"Ariane 4".European Space Agency.14 May 2004.Archivedfrom the original on 3 December 2023.Retrieved13 June2015.
  3. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabHarvey, Brian (2003).Europe's Space Programme: To Ariane and Beyond.Springer Science & Business Media.ISBN1-8523-3722-2.
  4. ^abWade, Mark (ed.)."Ariane".Encyclopedia Astronautica.Archivedfrom the original on 7 February 2024.Retrieved13 June2015.
  5. ^"Awards".Space Foundation.Archivedfrom the original on 19 May 2024.Retrieved13 June2015.
  6. ^"Ariane 4, un défi pour l'Europe spatiale"[Ariane 4 - A challenge for Europe's space industry] (in French).CNES.9 June 2015.Archivedfrom the original on 23 September 2023.Retrieved13 June2015.
  7. ^abCastanos, Francis (7 December 2020)."The Space Review: The cloth of doom: The weird, doomed ride of Ariane Flight 36".thespacereview.Archivedfrom the original on 4 December 2023.Retrieved25 December2021.
  8. ^"Ariane 4".Airbus Defence and Space. Archived fromthe originalon 27 September 2016.Retrieved13 June2015.
  9. ^"Arianespace Flight 159: Mission Accomplished! 23rd launch for Intelsat"(Press release).Arianespace.15 February 2003.Archivedfrom the original on 6 July 2023.Retrieved28 May2024.
  10. ^"Soyuz User's Manual"(PDF).Arianespace.March 2012. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 28 December 2013.Retrieved13 June2015.

External links[edit]