Jump to content

Asexuality

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about humans who lack sexual attraction or interest in sexual activity. For the lack of romantic attraction, seeAromanticism.For the lack of a gender, seeAgender.For other uses, seeAsexual (disambiguation).
Not to be confused withAsexual reproduction.

Asexuality
A group of people holding an asexual pride banner
Manifestación WorldPride 2017,Madrid
DefinitionLack ofsexual attractionto others; low or absentsexual desireor interest insexual activity
Abbreviationsace
Subcategories
Flag
Asexuality pride flag
Asexuality pride flag
Flag nameAsexuality pride flag
MeaningBlack for asexuality; gray for gray-asexuality; white forallosexuality;purple for community
Part ofa serieson
Asexualitytopics
Related topics
In society
Studies
Attitudes anddiscrimination
Asexual community
Lists
Portals
Sexual orientation
Sexual orientations
Related terms
Research
Animals
Related topics

Asexualityis the lack ofsexual attractionto others, or low or absent interest in ordesireforsexual activity.[1][2][3]It may be considered asexual orientationor the lack thereof.[4][5][6]It may also be categorizedmore widely,to include a broadspectrumofasexual sub-identities.[7][8]

Asexuality is distinct fromabstention from sexual activityand fromcelibacy,[9][10]which are behavioral and generally motivated by factors such as an individual's personal, social, or religious beliefs.[11]Sexual orientation, unlike sexual behavior, is believed to be "enduring".[12]Some asexual people engage in sexual activity despite lacking sexual attraction or adesire for sex,for a number of reasons, such as a desire to physically pleasure themselves or romantic partners, or a desire to have children.[9][13]

Acceptance of asexuality as a sexual orientation and field ofscientific researchis still relatively new,[2][13]as a growing body of research from both sociological and psychological perspectives has begun to develop.[13]While some researchers assert that asexuality is a sexual orientation, other researchers disagree.[4][5]Asexual individuals may represent about one percent of the population.[2]

Various asexual communities have started to form sincethe impact of the Internetand social media in the mid-1990s. The most prolific and well-known of these communities is theAsexual Visibility and Education Network,which was founded in 2001 byDavid Jay.[4][14]

Definition, identity and relationships

Because there is significant variation among those who identify as asexual, the termasexualitycan encompass broad definitions.[15]Researchers generally define asexuality as the lack ofsexual attractionor the lack of interest insexual activity,[4][13][16]though specific definitions vary—the term may be used to refer to individuals with low or absent sexual behavior or exclusivelyromanticnon-sexual partnerships in addition to low or absentsexual desireor attraction.[13][17]

TheAsexual Visibility and Education Network(AVEN), anonline forumdedicated to asexuality, defines an asexual as "someone who does not experience sexual attraction", as well as adding that asexuality "at its core" is "just a word that people use to help figure themselves out", and encourages people to use the termasexualto define themselves "as long as it makes sense to do so".[18]Asexuality is often abbreviated asace,a phonetic shortening ofasexual,[19]and the community as a whole is likewise referred to as theace community.[20][21]

Relationships

See also:Queerplatonic relationship
Simplified diagram of the aromantic and asexual spectra

Despite lacking sexual attraction, some asexuals might engage in purely romantic relationships, while others may not.[4][22]Some who identify as asexual report that they experience sexual attraction, though lack the inclination to act on it, citing no desire to engage in sexual activity—some asexuals also lack the desire to engage in non-sexual physical activity such ascuddlingorhand-holding,while others choose to do so.[9][10][13][15]Asexual people may seek relationships without romantic or sexual activity, known as "queerplatonic relationships".[19]Asquishis a term used by the asexual community to describe a non-sexualcrush.[19]

Certain asexuals may participate in sexual activity out of curiosity.[13]Some may alsomasturbateas a form of solitary release, while others may not feel a need to do so.[15][23][24]The desire for masturbation or other sexual activity is often referred to assex driveby asexuals, who disassociate it from sexual attraction and being asexual; asexuals who masturbate generally consider it to be a normal product of the human body rather than a sign of latent sexuality, and others do not find it pleasurable.[13][25]Some asexual men are unable to get anerectionand are unable to attemptpenetration.[26]Asexuals also differ in their views on performing sexual acts — some are indifferent and may engage in sexual activity for the benefit of a romantic partner, while others are more strongly averse to the idea, though they are not typicallyagainst sex as a whole.[13][15][24]

Many who identify as asexual may identify with diversegender identitiesor classifications ofromantic orientation.[27]These are often integrated with a person's asexual identity, and asexuals may still identify asheterosexual,lesbian,gay,orbisexualregarding romantic or emotional aspects ofsexual orientationorsexual identityin addition to identifying as asexual.[22]The romantic aspects of sexual orientations may also be indicated by a variety of romantic identities, includingbiromantic,heteroromantic,homoromantic,orpanromantic,and those who do not experience romantic attraction may identify asaromantic.[15][22]This split between romantic and sexual orientation is commonly explained as thesplit attraction model,which states that romantic and sexual attraction are not strictly linked for all people. Individuals who are both aromantic and asexual are sometimes known as "aro-ace"or"aroace".[28]

Gray asexuality

See also:Gray asexuality

The term "gray asexuality"refers to the spectrum between asexuality and non-asexuality (also referred to asallosexuality).[29]Individuals who identify as gray asexual may occasionally experience sexual attraction, or only experience sexual attraction as a secondary component once a reasonably stable or large emotional connection has been formed with the target, known asdemisexuality.[15][30]

Research

Prevalence

Kinsey scaleof sexual responses, indicating degrees ofsexual orientation.The original scale included a designation of "X", indicating a lack of sexual behavior.[31]

Most scholars agree that asexuality is rare, constituting 1% or less of the population.[32]Asexuality is not a new aspect of human sexuality, but it is relatively new to public discourse.[33]In comparison to other sexualities, asexuality has received little attention from the scientific community, with quantitative information pertaining to the prevalence of asexuality low in numbers.[34][35]S. E. Smith ofThe Guardianis not sure asexuality has actually increased, rather leaning towards the belief that it is simply more visible.[33]Alfred Kinseyrated individuals from 0 to 6 according to their sexual orientation from heterosexual to homosexual, known as theKinsey scale.He also included a category he called "X" for individuals with "no socio-sexual contacts or reactions."[36][37]Although, in modern times, this is categorized as representing asexuality,[38]scholarJustin J. Lehmillerstated, "the Kinsey X classification emphasized a lack of sexual behavior, whereas the modern definition of asexuality emphasizes a lack of sexual attraction. As such, the Kinsey Scale may not be sufficient for accurate classification of asexuality."[31]Kinsey labeled 1.5% of the adult male population asX.[36][37]In his second book,Sexual Behavior in the Human Female,he reported this breakdown of individuals who are X: unmarried females = 14–19%, married females = 1–3%, previously married females = 5–8%, unmarried males = 3–4%, married males = 0%, and previously married males = 1–2%.[37]

Further empirical data about an asexual demographic appeared in 1994 when a research team in the United Kingdom carried out a comprehensive survey of 18,876 British residents, spurred by the need for sexual information in the wake of theAIDS pandemic.The survey included a question on sexual attraction, to which 1.05% of the respondents replied that they had "never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all".[39]The study of this phenomenon was continued by Canadian sexuality researcherAnthony Bogaertin 2004, who explored the asexual demographic in a series of studies. Bogaert's research indicated that 1% of the British population does not experience sexual attraction, but he believed that the 1% figure was not an accurate reflection of the likely much larger percentage of the population that could be identified as asexual, noting that 30% of people contacted for the initial survey chose not to participate in the survey. Since less sexually experienced people are more likely to refuse to participate in studies about sexuality, and asexuals tend to be less sexually experienced than allosexuals, it is likely that asexuals were under-represented in the responding participants. The same study found the number of homosexuals and bisexuals combined to be about 1.1% of the population, which is much smaller than other studies indicate.[16][40]

Contrasting Bogaert's 1% figure, a study by Aicken et al., published in 2013, suggests that, based on Natsal-2 data from 2000 to 2001, the prevalence of asexuality in Britain is only 0.4% for the age range 16–44.[17][41]This percentage indicates a decrease from the 0.9% figure determined from the Natsal-1 data collected on the same age-range a decade earlier.[41]A 2015 analysis by Bogaert also found a similar decline between the Natsal-1 and Natsal-2 data.[42]Aicken, Mercer, and Cassell found some evidence of ethnic differences among respondents who had not experienced sexual attraction; both men and women of Indian and Pakistani origin had a higher likelihood of reporting a lack of sexual attraction.[41]

In a survey conducted byYouGovin 2015, 1,632 British adults were asked to try to place themselves on the Kinsey scale. 1% of participants answered "No sexuality". The breakdown of participants was 0% men, 2% women; 1% across all age ranges.[43]

Sexual orientation, mental health and cause

There is significant debate over whether or not asexuality is a sexual orientation.[4][5]It has been compared and equated withhypoactive sexual desire disorder(HSDD), a diagnosis which was in theDSM-4,in that both imply a general lack of sexual attraction to anyone; HSDD has been used tomedicalizeasexuality, but asexuality is generally not considered a disorder or asexual dysfunction(such asanorgasmia,anhedonia,etc.), because it does not necessarily define someone as having a medical problem or problems relating to others socially.[10][22][44]Unlike people with HSDD, asexual people normally do not experience "marked distress" and "interpersonal difficulty" concerning feelings about their sexuality, or generally a lack ofsexual arousal;asexuality is considered the lack or absence of sexual attraction as a life-enduring characteristic.[16][22]One study found that, compared to HSDD subjects, asexuals reported lower levels ofsexual desire,sexual experience, sex-related distress anddepressivesymptoms.[45]Researchers Richards and Barker report that asexuals do not have disproportionate rates ofalexithymia,depression, orpersonality disorders.[22]Some people, however, may identify as asexual even if their non-sexual state is explained by one or more of the aforementioned disorders.[46]

Since the release of theDSM-5in 2013 which split HSDD into diagnoses forfemale sexual arousal disorderand male hypoactive sexual desire disorder, both disorders have been criticised for similar issues to HSDD.[47]Although the DSM-5 mentions asexuality as an exclusion criterion for these two disorders, it is necessary for individuals to self-identify as asexual to meet the differential diagnosis and this requirement has been criticised for imposing a diagnosis on people who are possibly asexual but do not yet identify as such.[48]As of 2021,HSDD continues to be used to describe transgender women.[49]

The first study that gave empirical data about asexuals was published in 1983 by Paula Nurius, concerning the relationship between sexual orientation and mental health.[50]689 subjects—most of whom were students at various universities in the United States taking psychology or sociology classes—were given several surveys, including four clinical well-being scales. Results showed that asexuals were more likely to have low self-esteem and more likely to be depressed than members of other sexual orientations; 25.88% of heterosexuals, 26.54% bisexuals (called "ambisexuals" ), 29.88% of homosexuals, and 33.57% of asexuals were reported to have problems with self-esteem. A similar trend existed for depression. Nurius did not believe that firm conclusions can be drawn from this for a variety of reasons.[50][51]

In a 2013 study, Yule et al. looked into mental health variances between Caucasian heterosexuals, homosexuals, bisexuals, and asexuals. The results of 203 male and 603 female participants were included in the findings. Yule et al. found that asexual male participants were more likely to report having a mood disorder than other males, particularly in comparison to the heterosexual participants. The same was found for female asexual participants over their heterosexual counterparts; however, non-asexual, non-heterosexual females had the highest rates. Asexual participants of both sexes were more likely to have anxiety disorders than heterosexual and non-heterosexual participants, as were they more likely than heterosexual participants to report having had recent suicidal feelings. Yule et al. hypothesized that some of these differences may be due to discrimination and other societal factors.[52]

With regard to sexual orientation categories, asexuality may be argued as not being a meaningful category to add to the continuum, and instead argued as the lack of a sexual orientation or sexuality.[5]Other arguments propose that asexuality is the denial of one's natural sexuality, and that it is a disorder caused by shame of sexuality, anxiety orsexual abuse,sometimes basing this belief on asexuals who masturbate or occasionally engage in sexual activity simply to please a romantic partner.[5][24][26]Within the context of sexual orientation identity politics, asexuality may pragmatically fulfill the political function of a sexual orientation identity category.[29]

The suggestion that asexuality is a sexual dysfunction is controversial among the asexual community. Those who identify as asexual usually prefer it to be recognized as a sexual orientation.[4]Scholars who argue that asexuality is a sexual orientation may point to the existence of different sexual preferences.[5][9][26]They and many asexual people believe that the lack of sexual attraction is valid enough to be categorized as a sexual orientation.[53]The researchers argue that asexuals do not choose to have no sexual desire and generally start to find out their differences in sexual behaviors around adolescence. Because of these facts coming to light, it is reasoned that asexuality is more than a behavioral choice and is not something that can be cured like a disorder.[26][54]There is also analysis on whether identifying as asexual is becoming more popular.[55]

Research on the etiology of sexual orientation when applied to asexuality has the definitional problem of sexual orientation not consistently being defined by researchers as including asexuality.[56]While heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are usually, but not always, determined during the early years of preadolescent life, it is not known when asexuality is determined. "It is unclear whether these characteristics [viz.,"lacking interest in or desire for sex" ] are thought to be lifelong, or if they may be acquired. "[13]

One criterion usually taken to be defining of a sexual orientation is that it is stable over time. In a 2016 analysis in theArchives of Sexual Behavior,Brotto et al. found "only weak support" for this criterion being met among asexual individuals.[57]An analysis of data from theNational Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Healthby Stephen Cranney found that, of 14[a]individuals who reported no sexual attraction in the study's third wave (when subjects ranged in age from 18 to 26), only 3 continued to identify in this way at the fourth wave, six years later.[59]However, Cranney notes that asexual identification in the third wave was still significant as a predictor of asexual identification in the subsequent wave. In a subsequent commentary, Cranney stated that the interpretation of this data was complicated by the absence of any "set quantitative standard for how long a sexual desire must last before it is considered stable or intrinsic enough to be considered an orientation".[58]

Sexual activity and sexuality

While some asexuals masturbate as a solitary form of release or have sex for the benefit of a romantic partner, others do not (see above).[13][15][23]Fischer et al. reported that "scholars who study the physiology around asexuality suggest that people who are asexual are capable of genital arousal but may experience difficulty with so-called subjective arousal." This means that "while the body becomes aroused, subjectively – at the level of the mind and emotions – one does not experience arousal".[17]

TheKinsey Institutesponsored another small survey on the topic in 2007, which found that self-identified asexuals "reported significantly less desire for sex with a partner, lower sexual arousability, and lower sexual excitation but did not differ consistently from non-asexuals in their sexual inhibition scores or their desire to masturbate".[13]

A 1977 paper titledAsexual and Autoerotic Women: Two Invisible Groups,by Myra T. Johnson, is explicitly devoted to asexuality in humans.[60]Johnson defines asexuals as those men and women "who, regardless of physical or emotional condition, actual sexual history, and marital status or ideological orientation, seem toprefernot to engage in sexual activity. "She contrastsautoeroticwomen with asexual women: "The asexual woman... has no sexual desires at all [but] the autoerotic woman... recognizes such desires but prefers to satisfy them alone." Johnson's evidence is mostly letters to the editor found in women's magazines written by asexual/autoerotic women. She portrays them as invisible, "oppressed by a consensus that they are non-existent," and left behind by both the sexual revolution and the feminist movement. Johnson argued that society either ignores or denies their existence or insists they must be ascetic for religious reasons, neurotic, or asexual for political reasons.[60][61]

In a study published in 1979 in volume five ofAdvances in the Study of Affect,as well as in another article using the same data and published in 1980 in theJournal of Personality and Social Psychology,Michael D. Storms of theUniversity of Kansasoutlined his own reimagining of the Kinsey scale. Whereas Kinsey measured sexual orientation based on a combination of actual sexual behavior and fantasizing and eroticism, Storms used only fantasizing and eroticism. Storms, however, placed hetero-eroticism and homo-eroticism on separate axes rather than at two ends of a single scale; this allows for a distinction between bisexuality (exhibiting both hetero- and homo-eroticism in degrees comparable to hetero- or homosexuals, respectively) and asexuality (exhibiting a level of homo-eroticism comparable to a heterosexual and a level of hetero-eroticism comparable to a homosexual, namely, little to none). This type of scale accounted for asexuality for the first time.[62]Storms conjectured that many researchers following Kinsey's model could be mis-categorizing asexual subjects as bisexual, because both were simply defined by a lack of preference for gender in sexual partners.[63][64]

In a 1983 study by Paula Nurius, which included 689 subjects (most of whom were students at various universities in the United States taking psychology or sociology classes), the two-dimensional fantasizing and eroticism scale was used to measure sexual orientation. Based on the results, respondents were given a score ranging from 0 to 100 for hetero-eroticism and from 0 to 100 for homo-eroticism. Respondents who scored lower than 10 on both were labeled "asexual". This consisted of 5% of the males and 10% of the females. Results showed that asexuals reported much lower frequency and desired frequency of a variety of sexual activities including having multiple partners, anal sexual activities, having sexual encounters in a variety of locations, and autoerotic activities.[50][51]

Feminist research

The field of asexuality studies is still emerging as a subset of the broader field ofgender and sexuality studies.Notable researchers who have produced significant works in asexuality studies includeKJ Cerankowski,Ela Przybylo, and CJ DeLuzio Chasin.

A 2010 paper written by KJ Cerankowski and Megan Milks, titledNew Orientations: Asexuality and Its Implications for Theory and Practice,suggests that asexuality may be somewhat of a question in itself for the studies of gender and sexuality.[65]Cerankowski and Milks have suggested that asexuality raises many more questions than it resolves, such as how a person could abstain from having sex, which is generally accepted by society to be the most basic of instincts.[66]TheirNew Orientationspaper states that society has deemed "[LGBT and] female sexuality as empowered or repressed. The asexual movement challenges that assumption by challenging many of the basic tenets ofpro-sex feminism[in which it is] already defined as repressive or anti-sex sexualities. "In addition to accepting self-identification as asexual, the Asexual Visibility and Education Network has formulated asexuality as a biologically determined orientation. This formula, if dissected scientifically and proven, would support researcherSimon LeVay's blind study of thehypothalamusin gay men, women, and straight men, which indicates that there is a biological difference between straight men and gay men.[67]

In 2014, Cerankowski and Milks edited and publishedAsexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives,a collection of essays intended to explore the politics of asexuality from a feminist and queer perspective.[66]It is broken into the introduction and then six parts: Theorizing Asexuality: New Orientations; The Politics of Asexuality; Visualizing Asexuality in Media Culture; Asexuality and Masculinity; Health, Disability, and Medicalization; and Reading Asexually: Asexual Literary Theory. Each part contains two to three papers on a given aspect of asexuality research. One such paper is written by Ela Przybylo, another name that is becoming common in asexual scholarly literature. Her article, with regard to the Cerankowski and Milks anthology, focuses on accounts by self-identified male asexuals, with a particular focus on the pressures men experience towards having sex in dominant Western discourse and media. Three men living in Southern Ontario, Canada, were interviewed in 2011, and Przybylo admits that the small sample-size means that her findings cannot be generalized to a greater population in terms of representation, and that they are "exploratory and provisional", especially in a field that is still lacking in theorizations.[68]All three interviewees addressed being affected by the stereotype that men have to enjoy and want sex in order to be "real men".[68]

Another of Przybylo's works,Asexuality and the Feminist Politics of "Not Doing It",published in 2011, takes a feminist lens to scientific writings on asexuality. Pryzyblo argues that asexuality is made possible only through the Western context of "sexual, coital, and heterosexual imperatives".[69]She addresses earlier works by Dana Densmore, Valerie Solanas, and Breanne Fahs, who argued for "asexuality and celibacy" as radical feminist political strategies against patriarchy.[69]While Przybylo does make some distinctions between asexuality and celibacy, she considers blurring the lines between the two to be productive for a feminist understanding of the topic.[69]In her 2013 article, "Producing Facts: Empirical Asexuality and the Scientific Study of Sex", Przybylo distinguishes between two different stages of asexual research: that of the late 1970s to the early 1990s, which often included a very limited understanding of asexuality, and the more recent revisiting of the subject which she says began with Bogaert's 2004 study and has popularized the subject and made it more "culturally visible". In this article, Przybylo once again asserts the understanding of asexuality as a cultural phenomenon, and continues to be critical of its scientific study.[70]Pryzblo published a book,Asexual Erotics,in 2019. In this book, she argued that asexuality poses a "paradox" in that is a sexual orientation that is defined by the absence of sexual activity entirely. She distinguishes between a sociological understanding of asexuality and a cultural understanding, which she said could include "the open mesh of possibilities, gaps, overlaps, dissonances and resonances".[71]

CJ DeLuzio Chasin states inReconsidering Asexuality and Its Radical Potentialthat academic research on asexuality "has positioned asexuality in line withessentialistdiscourses of sexual orientation "which is troublesome as it creates abinarybetween asexuals and persons who have been subjected to psychiatric intervention for disorders such as Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder.[44]Chasin says that this binary implies that all asexuals experience a lifelong (hence, enduring) lack of sexual attraction, that all non-asexuals who experience a lack of sexual desire experience distress over it, and that it pathologizes asexuals who do experience such distress.[44]As Chasin says such diagnoses as HSDD act to medicalize and govern women's sexuality, the article aims to "unpack" problematic definitions of asexuality that are harmful to both asexuals and women alike. Chasin states that asexuality has the power to challenge commonplace discourse of the naturalness of sexuality, but that the unquestioned acceptance of its current definition does not allow for this. Chasin also argues there and elsewhere inMaking Sense in and of the Asexual Community: Navigating Relationships and Identities in a Context of Resistancethat it is important to interrogate why someone might be distressed about low sexual desire. Chasin further argues that clinicians have an ethical obligation to avoid treating low sexual desire per se as pathological, and to discuss asexuality as a viable possibility (where relevant) with clients presenting clinically with low sexual desire.[29]

Intersections with race and disability

Scholar Ianna Hawkins Owen writes, "Studies of race have revealed the deployment of asexuality in the dominant discourse as an ideal sexual behavior to justify both the empowerment of whites and the subordination of blacks to uphold a racialized social and political system."[72]This is partly due to the simultaneoussexualizationand de-sexualization of black women in theMammy archetype,as well as by how society de-sexualizes certain racial minorities, as part of a bid to claim superiority by Whites.[72]This is co-existent with the sexualization of black female bodies in theJezebelarchetype, both utilized to justify slavery and enable further control.[72]Owen also criticizes the "...investment in constructing asexuality upon a white racial rubric (who else can claim access to being just like everyone else?)".[73]Ben Brandley and Angela Labrador argue that asexual identity may be more accessible to white people than people of color because of how people of color aresexualized.[74]Michael Paramoargues in an article forAzethat this can create a "cyclical perception" that the asexual community is dominated by white people which can make people of color continue to feel excluded from it.[74][75]

Karen Cuthbert comments on "providing the first empirically grounded discussion of this intersection of asexuality and disability (and to a lesser extent gender and 'race')."[76]Eunjung Kim comments on the intersections between disability orcrip theoryand asexuality, saying disabled people are more frequently de-sexualized.[77][78]Disabled people who are also asexual have stated that they can feel invisible because of this since they must navigate these assumptions both within the asexual and disabled communities and outside of them.[79]Anna Kurowicka notes that asexual people may sometimes reject the notion that their asexuality is related to disability in an effort to avoid unwanted medical intervention. At the same time, disabled people may reject the assumption that they are inherently asexual.[80]Kurowicka argues that contemporary discourses should trouble the desire to separate asexuality and disability that is rooted incompulsory sexuality.[80]

Bogaert's psychological work and theories

Bogaert argues that understanding asexuality is of key importance to understanding sexuality in general.[42]For his work, Bogaert defines asexuality as "a lack of lustful inclinations/feelings directed toward others," a definition that he argues is relatively new in light of recent theory and empirical work on sexual orientation. This definition ofasexualityalso makes clear this distinction between behavior and desire, for both asexuality and celibacy, although Bogaert also notes that there is some evidence of reduced sexual activity for those who fit this definition. He further distinguishes between desire for others and desire for sexual stimulation, the latter of which is not always absent for those who identify as asexual, although he acknowledges that other theorists define asexuality differently and that further research needs to be done on the "complex relationship between attraction and desire".[42]Another distinction is made between romantic and sexual attraction, and he draws on work fromdevelopmental psychology,which suggests that romantic systems derive fromattachment theorywhile sexual systems "primarily reside in different brain structures".[42]

Concurrent with Bogaert's suggestion that understanding asexuality will lead to a better understanding of sexuality overall, he discusses the topic of asexual masturbation to theorize on asexuals and "'target-oriented'paraphilia,in which there is an inversion, reversal, or disconnection between the self and the typical target/object of sexual interest/attraction "(such as attraction to oneself, labelled" automonosexualism ").[42]

In an earlier 2006 article, Bogaert acknowledges that a distinction between behavior and attraction has been accepted into recent conceptualizations of sexual orientation, which aids in positioning asexuality as such.[81]He adds that, by this framework, "(subjective) sexual attraction is the psychological core of sexual orientation", and also addresses that there may be "some skepticism in [both] the academic and clinical communities" about classifying asexuality as a sexual orientation, and that it raises two objections to such a classification: First, he suggests that there could be an issue with self-reporting (i.e., "a 'perceived' or 'reported' lack of attraction", particularly for definitions of sexual orientation that consider physical arousal over subjective attraction), and, second, he raises the issue of overlap between absent andverylowsexual desire, as those with an extremely low desire may still have an "underlying sexual orientation" despite potentially identifying as asexual.[81]

Community

The history of the asexual community is presently undocumented in academic work.[82]Although several privatewebsitesfor those who fall under the modern definition of asexuality existed online in the 1990s,[83]scholars believe that it was not until the early 21st century when a community of self-identified asexuals began to form, aided by the popularity ofonline communities.[84]Several small communities existed online, such as the "Leather Spinsters", "Nonolibidoism Society", and "Haven for the Human Amoeba", documented byVolkmar Sigusch.[83]In 2001, activistDavid Jayfounded the Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN), whose stated goals are "creating public acceptance and discussion of asexuality and facilitating the growth of an asexual community".[4][14]

Some asexuals believe that participation in an asexual community is an important resource, as they often report feeling ostracized in broader society.[27]Communities such as AVEN can be beneficial to those in search of answers whenquestioning their sexual orientation,such as providing support if one feels their lack of sexual attraction constitutes a disease. Online asexual communities can also serve to inform others about asexuality.[85]However, affiliating with online communities among asexual people vary. Some question the purpose of online communities, while others heavily depend on them for support. According toElizabeth Abbott,asexuality has always been present in society, though asexual people kept a lower profile. She further stated that while the failure to consummate marriage was seen as an insult to the sacrament of marriage in medieval times, and has been sometimes used as grounds to terminate a marriage, though asexuality has never been illegal,unlike homosexuality.However, the recent growth of online communication andsocial networkingas facilitated the growth of a community built upon a common asexual identity.[86]

Symbols

Main article:LGBT symbols § Asexual and aromantic symbols
The asexual pride flag features four horizontal stripes: black, gray, white, and purple, from top to bottom
A black ring may be worn on one's right middle finger to indicate asexuality.

In 2009, AVEN members participated in the first asexual entry into an Americanpride paradeat theSan Francisco Pride Parade.[87]In 2010, after a period of debate surrounding the existence of apride flagto represent asexuality, as well as a system to create one, the asexual pride flag was formally announced. The final design was a popular design, and received the most votes in an onlineopen-access poll.[88]The flag's colors—four horizontal stripes of black, gray, white, and purple from top to bottom—represent asexuality, gray-asexuality, allosexuality, and community, respectively.[89][90][91]They have also since been used as a representation of asexuality as a whole.[88]Some members of the asexual community additionally opt to wear a black ring on their rightmiddle finger,colloquially known as an "ace ring", as a form of identification.[92]Some asexuals useaceplaying card suits as identities of their romantic orientation, such as theace of spadesfor aromanticism and theace of heartsfor non-aromanticism.[19]

Events

On June 29, 2014, AVEN organized the second International Asexuality Conference, as an affiliate WorldPride event in Toronto. The first was held at the 2012 World Pride in London.[93]The second such event, which was attended by around 250 people, was the largest gathering of asexuals to date.[94]The conference included presentations, discussions, and workshops on topics such as research on asexuality, asexual relationships, and intersecting identities.

Ace Week(formerly Asexual Awareness Week) occurs on the last full week in October. It is anawareness periodthat was created to celebrate and bring awareness to asexuality (including grey asexuality).[95][96]It was founded by Sara Beth Brooks in 2010.[97][98]

International Asexuality Day(IAD) is an annual celebration of the asexuality community that takes place on 6 April.[99]The intention for the day is "to place a special emphasis on the international community, going beyond the anglophone and Western sphere that has so far had the most coverage".[100]An international committee spent a little under a year preparing the event, as well as publishing a website and press materials.[101]This committee settled on the date of 6 April to avoid clashing with as many significant dates around the world as possible, although this date is subject to review and may change in future years.[100][102]The first International Asexuality Day was celebrated in 2021 and involved asexuality organizations from at least 26 countries.[99][103][104]Activities included virtual meetups, advocacy programs both online and offline, and the sharing of stories in various art-forms.[105]

Arts and literature

Darcie Little Badgeris asexual and has written various short stories and books that explore asexual experiences.[106]

Fiction

For a series of fictional characters in books and comics who are asexual, seefictional asexual characters.Several works of fiction that have asexual themes have been published:

Non-fiction

Michael Paramois the editor ofAzemagazine, and author ofEnding the Pursuit(2024).

A series of non-fiction articles and books covering asexuality have been published:

Religion

Studies have found no significant statistical correlation betweenreligionand asexuality,[118]with asexuality occurring with equal prevalence in both religious and irreligious individuals.[118]Asexuality is more common amongcelibate clergy,as non-asexuals are more likely to be discouraged byvows of chastity.[119]According to Aickenet al.,a higher proportion ofMuslimrespondents reported that they did not experience any form of sexual attraction compared toChristianrespondents.[118]

Because the application of the termasexualityis relatively recent, most religions do not have clear stances on it.[120][unreliable source?]

InMatthew 19:11–12,Jesusmentions "For there areeunuchswho were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others – and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of thekingdom of heaven."[121]Somebiblical exegeteshave interpreted the "eunuchs who were born that way" as including asexuals.[121][122]While Christianity has not directly mentioned asexuality, it has revered celibacy; the apostlePaul,writing as a celibate, has been described by some writers as asexual.[123]He writes in1 Corinthians 7:6–9,

I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that. Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

Main article:Discrimination against asexual people
Asexuals marching in a pride parade inLondon

A 2012 study published inGroup Processes & Intergroup Relationsreported that asexuals are evaluated more negatively in terms ofprejudice,dehumanizationanddiscriminationthan othersexual minorities,such as gay men, lesbians and bisexuals. Both homosexual and heterosexual people thought of asexuals as not only cold, but also animalistic and unrestrained.[124]A different study, however, found little evidence of serious discrimination against asexuals because of their asexuality.[125]Asexual activist, author, and bloggerJulie Deckerhas observed that sexual harassment and violence, such ascorrective rape,commonly victimizes the asexual community.[126]Sociologist Mark Carrigan sees a middle ground, arguing that while asexuals do often experience discrimination, it is not of aphobicnature but "more about marginalization because people genuinely don't understand asexuality."[127]

Asexuals also face prejudice from the LGBT community.[53][126]Many LGBT people assume that anyone who is not homosexual or bisexual must be straight[53]and frequently exclude asexuals from their definitions ofqueer.[53]Although many well-known organizations devoted to aiding LGBTQ communities exist,[53]these organizations generally do not reach out to asexuals[53]and do not provide library materials about asexuality.[53]Uponcoming outas asexual, activist Sara Beth Brooks was told by many LGBT people that asexuals are mistaken in their self-identification and seek undeserved attention within the social justice movement.[126]Other LGBT organizations, such asThe Trevor Projectand theNational LGBTQ Task Force,explicitly include asexuals because they are non-heterosexual and can therefore be included in the definition ofqueer.[128][129]Some organizations now add an A to the LGBTQ acronym to include asexuals; however, this is still a controversial topic in some queer organizations.[130]

In some jurisdictions, asexuals have legal protections. Since 1999, Brazil has banned pathologization orattempted treatment of sexual orientationby mental health professionals through the national ethical code,[131]and the U.S. state of New York has labeled asexuals as aprotected class.[132]However, asexuality does not typically attract the attention of the public or major scrutiny; therefore, it has not been the subject of legislation as much as other sexual orientations have.[40]

In media

Main article:Media portrayal of asexuality
SirArthur Conan Doyleintentionally portrayed his characterSherlock Holmesas what would today be classified as asexual.[119]

Asexual representation in mediais limited and rarely openly acknowledged or confirmed by creators or authors.[133]In works composed prior to the beginning of the twenty-first century, characters are generally automatically assumed to be sexual[134]and the existence of a character's sexuality is usually never questioned.[134]Sir Arthur Conan Doyleportrayed his characterSherlock Holmesas what would today be classified as asexual,[119]with the intention to characterize him as solely driven by intellect and immune to the desires of the flesh.[119]The Archie Comics characterJughead Joneswas likely intended by his creators as an asexualfoiltoArchie's excessive heterosexuality, but, over the years, this portrayal shifted, with various iterations and reboots of the series implying that he is either gay or heterosexual.[119][135]In 2016, he was confirmed to be asexual in theNew RiverdaleJughead comics.[135]The writers of the 2017 television showRiverdale,based on the Archie comics, chose to depict Jughead as a heterosexual despite pleas from both fans and Jughead actorCole Sprouseto retain Jughead's asexuality and allow the asexual community to be represented alongside the gay and bisexual communities, both represented in the show.[136]This decision sparked conversations about deliberateasexual erasurein the media and its consequences, especially on younger viewers.[137]

Anthony Bogaert has classifiedGilligan,the eponymous character of the 1960s television seriesGilligan's Island,as asexual.[119]Bogaert suggests that the producers of the show likely portrayed him in this way to make him more relatable to young male viewers of the show who had not yet reached puberty and had therefore presumably not yet experienced sexual desire.[119]Gilligan's asexual nature also allowed the producers to orchestrate intentionally comedic situations in which Gilligan spurns the advances of attractive females.[119]Films and television shows frequently feature attractive, but seemingly asexual, female characters who are "converted" to heterosexuality by the male protagonist by the end of the production.[119]These unrealistic portrayals reflect a heterosexual male belief that all asexual women secretly desire men.[119]

Asexuality as a sexual identity, rather than as a biological entity, became more widely discussed in the media in the beginning of the twenty-first century.[133]TheFox NetworkseriesHouserepresented an "asexual" couple in the episode "Better Half"(2012). However, this representation has been questioned by members of the asexual community, as the episode concluded that the man simply had a pituitary tumor that reduced his sex drive and the woman was only pretending to be asexual to please him,[138]leading to controversy over the representation and achange.orgpetition for Fox Network to reconsider how it represents asexual characters in the future, stating it "represented asexuality very poorly by attributing it to both medical illness and deception."[138]Otherfictional asexual charactersincludeSpongeBoband his best friendPatrickfromSpongeBob SquarePants[139][140][141]andTodd ChavezfromBoJack Horseman(generally well-accepted by the asexual community as positive representation).[142]

See also

Explanatory notes

  1. ^This denominator is mistakenly given as 25 in the abstract of Cranney's initial study. The number of individuals who reported no sexual attraction in wave III was 14, according to Table 2, the first paragraph of the section "Multivariate Analysis", and the following quote from Cranney's subsequent commentary: "Specifically, of the 14 people who indicated 'no sexual attraction' in Wave III, only three went on to do so in Wave IV (Table 2)."[58]

References

  1. ^Robert L. Crooks; Karla Baur (2016).Our Sexuality.Cengage Learning.p. 300.ISBN978-1305887428.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  2. ^abcKatherine M. Helm (2015).Hooking Up: The Psychology of Sex and Dating.ABC-CLIO.p. 32.ISBN978-1610699518.Archivedfrom the original on November 22, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  3. ^Kelly, Gary F. (2004). "Chapter 12".Sexuality Today: The Human Perspective(7th ed.).McGraw-Hill.p.401(sidebar).ISBN978-0-07-255835-7.Asexuality is a condition characterized by a low interest in sex.
  4. ^abcdefghMarshall Cavendish, ed. (2010). "Asexuality".Sex and Society.Vol. 2. Marshall Cavendish. pp. 82–83.ISBN978-0-7614-7906-2.Archivedfrom the original on October 16, 2015.RetrievedJuly 27,2013.
  5. ^abcdefBogaert, AF (April 2015). "Asexuality: What It Is and Why It Matters".The Journal of Sex Research.52(4): 362–379.doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1015713.PMID25897566.S2CID23720993.
  6. ^Bella DePaulo (September 5, 2016)."Sexual Orientation, Not a Sexual Dysfunction".
  7. ^Scherrer, Kristin (2008)."Coming to an Asexual Identity: Negotiating Identity, Negotiating Desire".Sexualities.11(5): 621–641.doi:10.1177/1363460708094269.PMC2893352.PMID20593009.
  8. ^"The 'Q' in LGBTQ: Queer/Questioning".American Psychiatric Association.
  9. ^abcdMargaret Jordan Halter; Elizabeth M. Varcarolis (2013).Varcarolis' Foundations of Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing.Elsevier Health Sciences.p. 382.ISBN978-1-4557-5358-1.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedMay 7,2014.
  10. ^abcDePaulo, Bella (September 26, 2011)."ASEXUALS: Who Are They and Why Are They Important?".Psychology Today.Archivedfrom the original on October 1, 2015.RetrievedDecember 13,2011.
  11. ^The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language(3d ed. 1992), entries forcelibacyand thenceabstinence.
  12. ^"Sexual orientation, homosexuality and bisexuality".American Psychological Association.Archivedfrom the original on August 8, 2013.RetrievedMarch 30,2013.
  13. ^abcdefghijklPrause, Nicole; Cynthia A. Graham (2007)."Asexuality: Classification and Characterization"(PDF).Archives of Sexual Behavior.36(3): 341–356.doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3.PMID17345167.S2CID12034925.RetrievedApril 4,2022.
  14. ^abSwash, Rosie (February 25, 2012)."Among the asexuals".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on February 11, 2021.RetrievedFebruary 2,2013.
  15. ^abcdefgKarli June Cerankowski; Megan Milks (2014).Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives.Routledge.pp. 89–93.ISBN978-1-134-69253-8.Archivedfrom the original on July 16, 2014.RetrievedJuly 3,2014.
  16. ^abcBogaert, Anthony F. (2006)."Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality".Review of General Psychology.10(3): 241–250.doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.241.S2CID143968129.Archived fromthe originalon January 14, 2012.RetrievedAugust 31,2007.
  17. ^abcNancy L. Fischer; Steven Seidman (2016).Introducing the New Sexuality Studies.Routledge.p. 183.ISBN978-1317449188.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  18. ^"Overview".The Asexual Visibility and Education Network. 2008.Archivedfrom the original on November 19, 2016.RetrievedJanuary 6,2016.
  19. ^abcdDecker, Julie Sondra(2015).The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality.Simon and Schuster.ISBN9781510700642.Archivedfrom the original on April 12, 2021.RetrievedApril 20,2019.[page needed]
  20. ^Meg Barker (2012).Rewriting the Rules: An Integrative Guide to Love, Sex and Relationships.Routledge.p. 69.ISBN978-0415517621.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedFebruary 8,2016.
  21. ^Shira Tarrant (2015).Gender, Sex, and Politics: In the Streets and Between the Sheets in the 21st Century.Routledge.pp. 254–256.ISBN978-1317814764.Archivedfrom the original on May 24, 2021.RetrievedFebruary 8,2016.
  22. ^abcdefChristina Richards; Meg Barker (2013).Sexuality and Gender for Mental Health Professionals: A Practical Guide.SAGE.pp. 124–127.ISBN978-1-4462-9313-3.Archivedfrom the original on July 28, 2014.RetrievedJuly 3,2014.
  23. ^abWestphal, Sylvia Pagan."Feature: Glad to be asexual".New Scientist.Archivedfrom the original on December 19, 2007.RetrievedNovember 11,2007.
  24. ^abcBridgeman, Shelley (August 5, 2007)."No sex please, we're asexual".The New Zealand Herald.Archivedfrom the original on November 3, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 16,2011.
  25. ^Yule, Morag A.; Brotto, Lori A.; Gorzalka, Boris B. (2014). "Sexual fantasy and masturbation among asexual individuals".The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality.23(2): 89–95.doi:10.3138/cjhs.2409.S2CID4091448.
  26. ^abcdCarrigan, Mark (August 2011). "There's More to Life Than Just Sex? Difference and Commonality Within the Asexual Community".Sexualities.14(4): 462–478.doi:10.1177/1363460711406462.S2CID146445274.
  27. ^abMacNeela, Pádraig; Murphy, Aisling (December 30, 2014). "Freedom, Invisibility, and Community: A Qualitative Study of Self-Identification with Asexuality".Archives of Sexual Behavior.44(3): 799–812.doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0458-0.ISSN0004-0002.PMID25548065.S2CID23757013.
  28. ^Kliegman, Julie (October 29, 2021)."What Does AroAce Mean? Not Everyone Who's Aromantic Is Asexual".Bustle.RetrievedAugust 4,2022.
  29. ^abcChasin, CJ DeLuzio (2015). "Making Sense in and of the Asexual Community: Navigating Relationships and Identities in a Context of Resistance".Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.25(2): 167–180.doi:10.1002/casp.2203.ISSN1099-1298.
  30. ^Adler, Melissa (2010). "Meeting the Needs of LGBTIQ Library Users and Their Librarians: A Study of User Satisfaction and LGBTIQ Collection Development in Academic Libraries". In Greenblatt, Ellen (ed.).Serving LGBTIQ Library and Archives Users.North Carolina:McFarland & Company.ISBN978-0-7864-4894-4.
  31. ^abJustin J. Lehmiller (2017).The Psychology of Human Sexuality.John Wiley & Sons.p. 250.ISBN978-1119164708.Archivedfrom the original on March 20, 2021.RetrievedNovember 29,2017.
  32. ^Etaugh, Claire A.; Bridges, Judith S. (October 16, 2017).Women's Lives: A Psychological Exploration, Fourth Edition.Taylor & Francis.ISBN978-1-315-44938-8.Archivedfrom the original on March 9, 2022.RetrievedJune 25,2021.
  33. ^abSmith, S. E. (August 21, 2012)."Asexuality always existed, you just didn't notice it".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on April 8, 2015.RetrievedMarch 11,2013.
  34. ^LeBreton, Marianne E. (2014). Bogaert, Anthony F. (ed.). "Understanding Asexuality".QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking.1(3): 175–177.doi:10.14321/qed.1.3.0175.ISSN2327-1574.JSTOR10.14321/qed.1.3.0175.
  35. ^Poston, Dudley L.; Baumle, Amanda K. (2010)."Patterns of asexuality in the United States".Demographic Research.23:509–530.doi:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.18.ISSN1435-9871.JSTOR26349603.
  36. ^abKinsey, Alfred C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.W.B. Saunders.ISBN978-0-253-33412-1.
  37. ^abcKinsey, Alfred C. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.W.B. Saunders.ISBN978-0-253-33411-4.
  38. ^Mary Zeiss Stange; Carol K. Oyster; Jane E. Sloan (February 23, 2011).Encyclopedia of Women in Today's World.SAGE Publications. p. 158.ISBN978-1-4129-7685-5.Archivedfrom the original on September 14, 2020.RetrievedJuly 27,2013.
  39. ^Wellings, K. (1994).Sexual Behaviour in Britain: The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.Penguin Books.
  40. ^abBogaert, Anthony F. (2004). "Asexuality: prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample".Journal of Sex Research.41(3): 279–87.doi:10.1080/00224490409552235.PMID15497056.S2CID41057104.
  41. ^abcAicken, Catherine R. H.; Mercer, Catherine H.; Cassell, Jackie A. (May 1, 2013)."Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys".Psychology & Sexuality.4(2): 121–135.doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774161.ISSN1941-9899.S2CID62275856.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedOctober 14,2018.
  42. ^abcdeBogaert, A. F. (2015). "Asexuality: What It Is and Why It Matters".Journal of Sex Research.52(4): 362–379.doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1015713.PMID25897566.S2CID23720993.
  43. ^"1 in 2 young people say they are not 100% heterosexual"(PDF).August 16, 2015. See the full poll results.Archivedfrom the original on April 9, 2021.RetrievedDecember 31,2018.
  44. ^abcChasin, CJ DeLuzio (2013)."Reconsidering Asexuality and Its Radical Potential"(PDF).Feminist Studies.39(2): 405.doi:10.1353/fem.2013.0054.S2CID147025548.Archived(PDF)from the original on March 3, 2014.RetrievedApril 29,2014.
  45. ^Brotto, L. A.; Yule, M. A.; Gorzalka, B..B. (2015). "Asexuality: An Extreme Variant of Sexual Desire Disorder?".The Journal of Sexual Medicine.12(3): 646–660.doi:10.1111/jsm.12806.PMID25545124.S2CID30504509.
  46. ^Karli June Cerankowski; Megan Milks (2014).Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives.Routledge.p. 246.ISBN978-1-134-69253-8.Archivedfrom the original on September 12, 2015.RetrievedJuly 3,2014.
  47. ^Conley-Fonda, Brenna; Leisher, Taylor (January 2, 2018)."Asexuality: Sexual Health Does Not Require Sex".Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity.25(1): 6–11.doi:10.1080/10720162.2018.1475699.ISSN1072-0162.S2CID149652679.
  48. ^Van Houdenhove, Ellen; Enzlin, Paul; Gijs, Luk (April 1, 2017)."A Positive Approach Toward Asexuality: Some First Steps, But Still a Long Way to Go".Archives of Sexual Behavior.46(3): 647–651.doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0921-1.ISSN1573-2800.PMID28091869.S2CID20911875.
  49. ^Cocchetti, Carlotta; Ristori, Jiska; Mazzoli, Francesca; Vignozzi, Linda; Maggi, Mario; Fisher, Alessandra Daphne (November 2021)."Management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in transgender women: a guide for clinicians".International Journal of Impotence Research.33(7): 703–709.doi:10.1038/s41443-021-00409-8.ISSN1476-5489.PMID33558671.S2CID231850308.
  50. ^abcElisabetta Ruspini; Megan Milks (2013).Diversity in family life.Policy Press.pp. 35–36.ISBN978-1447300939.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  51. ^abNurius, Paula (1983). "Mental Health Implications of Sexual Orientation".The Journal of Sex Research.19(2): 119–136.doi:10.1080/00224498309551174.
  52. ^Yule, Morag A.; Brotto, Lori A.; Gorzalka, Boris B. (2013). "Mental Health and Interpersonal Functioning in Self-Identified Asexual Men and Women".Psychology & Sexuality.4(2): 136–151.doi:10.1080/19419899.2013.774162.S2CID147120909.
  53. ^abcdefgDecker, Julie Sondra (2015).The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality.New York City, New York: Skyhorse Publishing.ISBN978-1-5107-0064-2.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  54. ^Over, Ray; Koukounas, Eric (1995)."Habituation of Sexual Arousal: Product and Process".Annual Review of Sex Research.6(1): 187–223.doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00096-5.PMID11473795.S2CID35865728.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 20,2013.
    Cited from:Kelly, Gary F. (2004).Sexuality Today: The Human Perspective(7th ed.).McGraw-Hill.p. 401.ISBN978-0-07-255835-7.
  55. ^Meyer, Doug (2017). "The Disregarding of Heteronormativity: Emphasizing a Happy Queer Adulthood and Localizing Anti-Queer Violence to Adolescent Schools".Sexuality Research & Social Policy.14(3): 331–344.doi:10.1007/s13178-016-0272-7.S2CID151482192.
  56. ^Garcia-Falgueras, A; Swaab, DF (2010). "Sexual hormones and the brain: an essential alliance for sexual identity and sexual orientation".Endocrine Development.17:22–35.doi:10.1159/000262525.ISBN978-3-8055-9302-1.PMID19955753.
  57. ^Brotto, L. A.; Yule, M. (2016). "Asexuality: Sexual Orientation, Paraphilia, Sexual Dysfunction, or None of the Above?".Archives of Sexual Behavior.46(3): 619–627.doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0802-7.PMID27542079.S2CID207092428.
  58. ^abCranney, Stephen (2016). "Does Asexuality Meet the Stability Criterion for a Sexual Orientation?".Archives of Sexual Behavior.46(3): 637–638.doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0887-z.PMID27815642.S2CID40119928.
  59. ^Cranney, Stephen (2016)."The Temporal Stability of Lack of Sexual Attraction across Young Adulthood".Archives of Sexual Behavior.45(3): 743–749.doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0583-4.PMC5443108.PMID26228992.
  60. ^abKarli June Cerankowski; Megan Milks (2014).Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives.Routledge.p. 244.ISBN978-1-134-69253-8.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  61. ^"Asexual and Autoerotic Women: Two Invisible Groups" found in ed. Gochros, H. L.; J. S. Gochros (1977).The Sexually Oppressed.Associated Press.ISBN978-0-8096-1915-3
  62. ^Karli June Cerankowski; Megan Milks (2014).Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives.Routledge.p. 113.ISBN978-1-134-69253-8.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  63. ^Storms, Michael D. (1980)."Theories of Sexual Orientation"(PDF).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.38(5): 783–792.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.5.783.Archived(PDF)from the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedFebruary 2,2013.
  64. ^Storms, M. D. (1979). Sexual orientation and self-perception. ed. Pliner, Patricia et al.Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect. Volume 5: Perception of Emotion in Self and OthersPlenum Press
  65. ^Aleksondra Hultquist; Elizabeth J. Mathews (2016).New Perspectives on Delarivier Manley and Eighteenth Century Literature: Power, Sex, and Text.Routledge.p. 123.ISBN978-1317196921.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  66. ^abKarli June Cerankowski; Megan Milks (2014).Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives.Routledge.pp. 1–410.ISBN978-1-134-69253-8.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 4,2017.
  67. ^Myers, David G. (2010).Psychology(9th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. p. 474.ISBN978-1-4292-1597-8.
  68. ^abPrzybylo, Ela. "Masculine Doubt and Sexual Wonder: Asexually-Identified Men Talk About Their (A)sexualities" from Karli June Cerankowski and Megan Milks, eds.,Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives(Routledge, 2014), 225-246.
  69. ^abcPrzybylo, Ela (2011).Asexuality and the Feminist Politics of 'Not Doing It'(MA thesis). Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta.doi:10.7939/R3RB04.
  70. ^Przybylo, Ela (2013). "Producing Facts: Empirical Asexuality and the Scientific Study of Sex".Feminism & Psychology.23(2): 224–242.doi:10.1177/0959353512443668.S2CID144394132.
  71. ^Przybylo, Ela (2019).Asexual erotics: intimate readings of compulsory sexuality.Columbus:Ohio State University.pp. 1–32.ISBN978-0-8142-1404-6.OCLC1096288008.Archivedfrom the original on March 9, 2022.RetrievedDecember 9,2020.
  72. ^abcHawkins Owen, Ianna (2014). "On the racialization of asexuality". In Cerankowski, Karli June; Milks, Megan (eds.).Asexualities: feminist and queer perspectives.New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.ISBN978-0-415-71442-6.OCLC863044056.
  73. ^Owen, Ianna Hawkins (November 2018)."Still, nothing: Mammy and black asexual possibility".Feminist Review.120(1): 70–84.doi:10.1057/s41305-018-0140-9.ISSN0141-7789.S2CID149999756.
  74. ^abBrandley, ben; Labador, Angela (November 22, 2022)."Towards an asexual-affirming communication pedagogy".Communication Education.72(4): 335.doi:10.1080/03634523.2022.2151638.ISSN0363-4523.S2CID254354072....when we presume that aceness is a feature of whiteness, by and for white folks, it creates a "cyclical perception" that can influence white aces "to feel more accepted in ace spaces in comparison with people of color" which concomitantly excludes and invisibilizes ace people of color (Paramo, 2017, para. 3).
  75. ^Paramo, Michael (October 25, 2017)."Interrogating the Whiteness of the Asexual Community".AZE.RetrievedAugust 24,2023.
  76. ^Cuthbert, Karen (2017)."You Have to be Normal to be Abnormal: An Empirically Grounded Exploration of the Intersection of Asexuality and Disability".Sociology.51(2): 241–257.doi:10.1177/0038038515587639.ISSN0038-0385.S2CID141976966.Archivedfrom the original on March 7, 2022.RetrievedMarch 7,2022– via SAGE Publications.
  77. ^Kim, Eunjung (2014). "Asexualities and disabilities in constructing sexual normalcy". In Cerankowski, Karli June; Milks, Megan (eds.).Asexualities: feminist and queer perspectives.New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.ISBN978-0-415-71442-6.OCLC863044056.
  78. ^Kim, Eunjung (2011)."Asexuality in disability narratives".Sexualities.14(4): 479–493.doi:10.1177/1363460711406463.S2CID55747579.Archivedfrom the original on March 7, 2022.RetrievedMarch 7,2022– via Sage Journals.
  79. ^Paramo, Michael (February 8, 2024).Ending the Pursuit: Asexuality, Aromanticism and Agender Identity.Unbound Publishing. pp. 30–31.ISBN978-1-80018-286-8.
  80. ^abKurowicka, Anna (May 4, 2023)."Contested intersections: Asexuality and disability, illness, or trauma".Sexualities:136346072311707.doi:10.1177/13634607231170781.ISSN1363-4607.S2CID258524276.
  81. ^abBogaert, Anthony F (2006). "Toward a Conceptual Understanding of Asexuality".Review of General Psychology.10(3): 241–250.doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.241.S2CID143968129.
  82. ^Carrigan, Mark; Gupta, Kristina; Morrison, Todd G. (2015).Asexuality and Sexual Normativity: An Anthology.Routledge.ISBN978-0-415-73132-4.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedAugust 20,2019.
  83. ^abVolkmar Sigusch."Sexualitäten: Eine kritische Theorie in 99 Fragmenten". 2013.Campus Verlag[de].
  84. ^Abbie E. Goldberg (2016).The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies.SAGE Publications.p. 92.ISBN978-1483371290.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedOctober 5,2017.[...] The sociological literature has stressed the novelty of asexuality as a distinctive form of social identification that emerged in the early 21st century.
  85. ^Carrigan, Mark (2011). "There's more to life than sex? Differences and commonality within the asexual community".Sexualities.14(4): 462–478.doi:10.1177/1363460711406462.S2CID146445274.
  86. ^Duenwald, Mary (July 9, 2005)."For Them, Just Saying No Is Easy".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on October 20, 2014.RetrievedSeptember 17,2007.
  87. ^Anneli, Rufus (June 22, 2009)."Stuck. Asexuals at the Pride Parade".Psychology Today.Archivedfrom the original on March 9, 2022.RetrievedJuly 15,2013.
  88. ^ab"Asexuality – Redefining Love and Sexuality".recultured. January 9, 2012.Archivedfrom the original on June 17, 2018.RetrievedAugust 7,2012.
  89. ^Bilić, Bojan; Kajinić, Sanja (2016).Intersectionality and LGBT Activist Politics: Multiple Others in Croatia and Serbia.Springer. pp. 95–96.
  90. ^Decker, Julie.The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality.Skyhorse.
  91. ^"Asexual".UCLA Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Resource center. Archived fromthe originalon September 4, 2017.RetrievedJune 25,2018.
  92. ^Chasin, CJ DeLuzio (2013). "Reconsidering Asexuality and Its Radical Potential".Feminist Studies.39(2): 405–426.doi:10.1353/fem.2013.0054.S2CID147025548.
  93. ^Shira Tarrant (June 19, 2015).Gender, Sex, and Politics: In the Streets and Between the Sheets in the 21st Century.Taylor & Francis. pp. 278–.ISBN978-1-317-81475-7.Archivedfrom the original on February 13, 2021.RetrievedSeptember 4,2017.
  94. ^"World Pride Toronto: Asexuals march in biggest numbers yet".Toronto Star.June 23, 2014.Archivedfrom the original on November 18, 2021.RetrievedOctober 6,2014.
  95. ^Kumar, Shikha (March 18, 2017)."Meet India's newest sexual minority: The asexuals".Hindustan Times.Archivedfrom the original on June 29, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 8,2017.
  96. ^"AAW – About Us".asexualawarenessweek.Archivedfrom the original on January 7, 2016.RetrievedJanuary 3,2016.
  97. ^Exton, Robyn (November 14, 2016)."Aces Show Their Hand – What Is Asexuality And Why You Should Know About It".HuffPost.Archivedfrom the original on June 29, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 8,2017.
  98. ^"About [prerelease]".asexualawarenessweek.Archivedfrom the original on September 4, 2017.RetrievedSeptember 4,2017.
  99. ^ab"International Asexuality Day".International Asexuality Day (IAD).Archivedfrom the original on April 7, 2021.RetrievedApril 8,2021.
  100. ^ab"FAQ".International Asexuality Day (IAD).Archivedfrom the original on March 7, 2021.RetrievedApril 8,2021.
  101. ^"Redefining Perceptions Of Asexuality With Yasmin Benoit".noctismag.Archivedfrom the original on April 6, 2021.RetrievedApril 8,2021.
  102. ^Flood, Rebecca (April 6, 2021)."Asexual Meaning as First International Asexuality Day Celebrated Around the World".Newsweek.Archivedfrom the original on April 6, 2021.RetrievedApril 7,2021.
  103. ^Waters, Jamie (March 21, 2021)."'I don't want sex with anyone': the growing asexuality movement ".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on April 1, 2021.RetrievedApril 7,2021.
  104. ^O'Dell, Liam (April 6, 2021)."What is International Asexuality Day?".The Independent.Archivedfrom the original on April 6, 2021.RetrievedApril 7,2021.
  105. ^"In Nepal's growing queer movement, here's how asexuals are trying to amplify their voice".kathmandupost.Archivedfrom the original on April 9, 2021.RetrievedApril 7,2021.
  106. ^Brigid, Kathleen (Spring 2022)."Asexuality, Indigeneity, and Monstrous Isolation in the Works of Darcie Little Badger"(PDF).Feral Feminisms.10(2): 28–30.
  107. ^abcdBrittain, Rachel (October 24, 2022)."Must-Read Asexual Books for Ace Week".BOOK RIOT.RetrievedFebruary 11,2024.
  108. ^abcdefgh"Feral Feminisms focuses special issue on aro/ace authors, scholars, creators".News.June 5, 2022.RetrievedAugust 27,2023.
  109. ^abcdefgh"feral feminisms » Issue 10.2: Ace and Aro Reviews Issue".RetrievedAugust 27,2023.
  110. ^Przybylo, Ela (2019).Asexual Erotics: Intimate Readings of Compulsory Sexuality.Ohio State University Press.ISBN978-0-8142-5542-1.
  111. ^Chen, Angela (September 14, 2021).Ace: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex.Beacon Press.ISBN978-0-8070-1473-8.
  112. ^Costello, Sarah; Kaszyca, Kayla (February 21, 2023).Sounds Fake But Okay: An Asexual and Aromantic Perspective on Love, Relationships, Sex, and Pretty Much Anything Else.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1-83997-002-3.
  113. ^Young, Eris (December 21, 2022).Ace Voices: What it Means to Be Asexual, Aromantic, Demi or Grey-Ace.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1-78775-699-1.
  114. ^Brown, Sherronda J. (September 13, 2022).Refusing Compulsory Sexuality.North Atlantic Books.ISBN9781623177102.
  115. ^Project, The Ace and Aro Advocacy (April 21, 2023).Ace and Aro Journeys: A Guide to Embracing Your Asexual or Aromantic Identity.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1-83997-639-1.
  116. ^Costello, Sarah; Kaszyca, Kayla (February 21, 2023).Sounds Fake But Okay: An Asexual and Aromantic Perspective on Love, Relationships, Sex, and Pretty Much Anything Else.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1839970016.Archivedfrom the original on February 19, 2023.RetrievedMarch 26,2023.
  117. ^Paramo, Michael (February 8, 2024).Ending the Pursuit: Asexuality, Aromanticism and Agender Identity.Unbound Publishing.ISBN978-1-80018-286-8.
  118. ^abcAicken, Catherine R. H.; Mercer, Catherine H.; Cassell, Jackie A. (September 7, 2015). "Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys". In Carrigan, Mark; Gupta, Kristina; Morrison, Todd G. (eds.).Asexuality and Sexual Normativity: An Anthology.New York City, New York and London, England: Routledge. pp. 22–27.ISBN978-0-415-73132-4.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  119. ^abcdefghijBogaert, Anthony (2012).Understanding Asexuality.Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. pp. 36–39.ISBN978-1-4422-0099-9.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  120. ^"Asexuality and Christianity"(PDF).Asexual Awareness Week.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on October 29, 2013.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  121. ^abKaoma, Kapya (2018).Christianity, Globalization, and Protective Homophobia: Democratic Contestation of Sexuality in Sub-Saharan Africa.Boston, Massachusetts: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 159–160.ISBN978-3-319-66341-8.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  122. ^Cole, William Graham (2015) [1955].Sex in Christianity and Psychoanalysis.Routledge Library Editions: Psychoanalysis. New York City, New York and London, England: Routledge. p. 177.ISBN978-1138951792.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 10,2018.
  123. ^Zuckerman, Phil (2003).An Invitation to Sociology of Religion.New York City, New York and London, England: Routledge. p. 111.ISBN978-0-415-94125-9.Archivedfrom the original on September 23, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 11,2018.
  124. ^MacInnis, Cara C.; Hodson, Gordon (2012). "Intergroup bias toward 'Group X': Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals".Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.15(6): 725–743.doi:10.1177/1368430212442419.S2CID3056711.
  125. ^Gazzola, Stephanie B, and Melanie A. Morrison. "Asexuality: An emergent sexual orientation".Sexual Minority Research in the New Millennium.
  126. ^abcMosbergen, Dominique (June 20, 2013)."Battling Asexual Discrimination, Sexual Violence, and Corrective Rape".HuffPost.Archivedfrom the original on August 18, 2013.RetrievedAugust 2,2013.
  127. ^Wallis, Lucy (January 17, 2012)."What is it like to be asexual?".BBC News.BBC.Archivedfrom the original on January 6, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 1,2014.
  128. ^The Trevor Project - FAQ about asexualityArchivedApril 6, 2021, at theWayback Machine,The Trevor Projectwebsite. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
  129. ^"The a is Here to Stay".April 30, 2013. Archived fromthe originalon March 10, 2018.RetrievedApril 4,2018.
  130. ^Mosbergen, Dominique (June 21, 2013)."LGBT, Asexual Communities Clash over Ace Inclusion".HuffPost.Archivedfrom the original on March 5, 2018.RetrievedApril 4,2018.
  131. ^Psychiatrist Jairo Bouer talks about the "collateral effects" of "gay cure" billArchivedJanuary 15, 2014, at theWayback Machine(in Portuguese)
  132. ^The Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act ( "SONDA" )(State of New York, Office of the Attorney General, Civil Rights Bureau)
  133. ^abKelemen, Erick. "Asexuality".Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender.Ed. Fedwa Malti-Douglas. Vol. 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. 103. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. May 2, 2016.
  134. ^abJackson, Stevi, and Sue Scott. Theorizing Sexuality. Maidenhead: Open UP, 2010. Web. May 2, 2016.
  135. ^ab"Archie Comic Reveals Jughead Is Asexual".Vulture.February 8, 2016.Archivedfrom the original on December 7, 2017.RetrievedDecember 14,2017.
  136. ^"Cole Sprouse Is Bummed That RIVERDALE's Jughead Isn't Asexual".Nerdist.January 27, 2017. Archived fromthe originalon June 26, 2018.RetrievedSeptember 9,2018.
  137. ^Revanche, Jonno."'Riverdale's' Asexual Erasure Can Be More Harmful Than You Think ".Teen Vogue.Archivedfrom the original on March 4, 2021.RetrievedSeptember 9,2018.
  138. ^abClark-Flory, Tracy (January 31, 2012).""House" gets asexuality wrong ".Salon.Archivedfrom the original on September 21, 2017.RetrievedSeptember 8,2017.
  139. ^"Camp cartoon star 'is not gay'".October 9, 2002.Archivedfrom the original on March 29, 2019.RetrievedNovember 25,2019.
  140. ^"SpongeBob Asexual, Not Gay: Creator".People.Archivedfrom the original on February 25, 2021.RetrievedNovember 25,2019.
  141. ^"SpongeBob is asexual, says creator".Asexual Visibility and Education Network.December 23, 2006.Archivedfrom the original on July 26, 2020.RetrievedNovember 25,2019.
  142. ^Kliegman, Julie (September 26, 2018)."Todd's Asexuality on 'BoJack' Isn't a Perfect Depiction, But It's Made Me Feel Understood".Bustle.Archivedfrom the original on February 26, 2021.RetrievedApril 30,2019.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asexuality&oldid=1243722766"