Jump to content

CLCN5

This article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding peer-reviewed article was published in the journal Gene. Click to view.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
CLCN5
Available structures
PDBOrtholog search:PDBeRCSB
Identifiers
AliasesCLCN5,CLC5, CLCK2, ClC-5, DENTS, NPHL1, NPHL2, XLRH, XRN, hCIC-K2, chloride voltage-gated channel 5, DENT1
External IDsOMIM:300008;MGI:99486;HomoloGene:73872;GeneCards:CLCN5;OMA:CLCN5 - orthologs
Orthologs
SpeciesHumanMouse
Entrez
Ensembl
UniProt
RefSeq (mRNA)

NM_000084
NM_001127898
NM_001127899
NM_001272102
NM_001282163

NM_001243762
NM_016691

RefSeq (protein)

NP_000075
NP_001121370
NP_001121371
NP_001259031
NP_001269092

NP_001230691
NP_057900

Location (UCSC)Chr X: 49.92 – 50.1 MbChr X: 7.02 – 7.19 Mb
PubMedsearch[3][4]
Wikidata
View/Edit HumanView/Edit Mouse

TheCLCN5geneencodes thechloride channelCl-/H+ exchanger ClC-5. ClC-5 is mainly expressed in thekidney,in particular inproximal tubuleswhere it participates to the uptake ofalbuminand low-molecular-weight proteins, which is one of the principal physiological role of proximal tubular cells.Mutationsin theCLCN5gene cause anX-linked recessivenephropathy namedDent disease(Dent disease 1 MIM#300009) characterized by excessive urinary loss of low-molecular-weight proteins and of calcium (hypercalciuria),nephrocalcinosis(presence of calcium phosphate aggregates in the tubular lumen and/or interstitium) andnephrolithiasis(kidney stones).

The CLCN5 gene[edit]

Structure[edit]

The humanCLCN5gene (MIM#300008, reference sequence NG_007159.2) is localized in the pericentromeric region onchromosomeXp11.23. It extends over about 170 Kb ofgenomic DNA,has a coding region of 2,238 bp and consists of 17exonsincluding 11 coding exons (from 2 to 12).[5][6][7][8]TheCLCN5gene has 8paralogues(CLCN1,CLCN2,CLCN3,CLCN4,CLCN6,CLCN7,CLCNKA,CLCNKB) and 201orthologuesamong jawed vertebrates (Gnathostomata).

Five differentCLCN5gene transcriptshave been discovered, two of which (transcript variants 3 [NM_000084.5] and 4 [NM_001282163.1]) encode for the canonical 746 amino acidprotein,two (transcript variants 1 [NM_001127899.3] and 2 [NM_001127898.3]) for theNH2-terminalextended 816 amino acid protein[9]and one does not encode for any protein (Transcript variant 5, [NM_001272102.2]). The5’ untranslated region(5’UTR) ofCLCN5is complex and not entirely clarified. Two strong and one weakpromoterswere predicted to be present in theCLCN5gene.[10][11]Several different 5’ alternatively used exons have been recognized in the human kidney.[9][10][11][12]The three promoters drive with varying degree of efficiency 11 differentmRNAs,with transcription initiating from at least three different start sites.[10]

The chloride channel H+/Clexchanger ClC-5[edit]

Like all ClC channels, ClC-5 needs to dimerize to create the pore through which the ions pass.[13][14][15]ClC-5 can form both homo- and hetero-dimersdue to its marked sequence homology withClC-3andClC-4.[16][17][18]

The canonical 746-amino acidClC-5 protein has 18membranespanningα-helices(named A to R), an intracellular N- terminaldomainand a cytoplasmic C-terminus containing twocystathionine beta-synthase(CBS) domains which are known to be involved in the regulation of ClC-5 activity.[13][19][20][21]Helices B, H, I, O, P, and Q are the six major helices involved in the formation of dimer’s interface and are crucial for proper pore configuration.[13][14]The Clselectivity filter is principally driven by helices D, F, N, and R, which are conveyed together near the channel center.[13][14][22][23]Two important amino acids for the proper ClC-5 function are theglutamic acidsat position 211 and 268 called respectively “gating glutamate” and “proton glutamate”.[24][25][26][27]The gating glutamate is necessary for both H+transport and ClC-5 voltage dependence.[8][28][29]The proton glutamate is crucial to the H+transport acting as an H+transfer site.[24][30][31]

Localization and function[edit]

ClC-5 belongs to the family of voltage gated chloride channel that are regulators of membrane excitability, transepithelial transport and cell volume in differenttissues.Based on sequence homology, the nine mammalian ClC proteins can be grouped into three classes, of which the first (ClC-1,ClC-2,ClC-KaandClC-Kb) is expressed primarily in plasma membranes, whereas the other two (ClC-3,ClC-4,and ClC-5 andClC-6andClC-7) are expressed primarily inorganellarmembranes.[32]

ClC-5 is expressed in minor to moderate level inbrain,muscle,intestinebut highly in the kidney, primarily in proximal tubular cells of S3 segment, in alfa intercalated cells of corticalcollecting ductof and in cortical and medullary thick ascending limb ofHenle’s loop.[33][34][35][36][37][38]

Proximal tubular cells (PTCs) are the main site of ClC-5 expression. By means of thereceptor-mediated endocytosisprocess, they uptake albumin and low-molecular-weight proteins freely passed through theglomerular filter.ClC-5 is located in earlyendosomesof PTCs where it co-localizes with the electrogenic vacuolar H+‐ATPase (V‐ATPase).[34][38]ClC-5 in this compartment contributes to the maintenance of intra-endosomal acidicpH.Environment acidification is necessary for the dissociation ofligandfrom itsreceptor.The receptor is then recycled to the apical membrane, while ligand is transported to the late endosome andlysosomewhere it is degraded. ClC-5 supports efficient acidification of endosomes either by providing a Clconductance to counterbalance the accumulation of positively charged H+pumped in by V-ATPase or by directly acidifying endosome in parallel with V-ATPase.[39]

Experimental evidence indicates that endosomal Clconcentration, which is raised by ClC-5 in exchange for protons accumulated by the V-ATPase, may play a role in endocytosis independently from endosomal acidification, thus pointing to another possible mechanism by which ClC-5 dysfunction may impair endocytosis.[40]

ClC-5 is located also at the cell surface of PTCs where probably it plays a role in the formation/function of the endocytic complex that also involvesmegalinandcubilin/amnionlessreceptors, the sodium-hydrogen antiporter 3 (NHE3), and the V-ATPase.[41][42]It was demonstrated at the C-terminus of ClC-5 binds theactin-depolymerizing proteincofilin.When the nascent endosome forms, the recruitment of cofilin by ClC-5 is a prerequisite for the localized dissolution of the actincytoskeleton,thus permitting the endosome to pass into thecytoplasm.It is conceivable that at the cell surface, the large intracellular C-terminus of ClC-5 has a crucial function in mediating the assembly, stabilization and disassembly of the endocytic complex via protein–protein interactions. Therefore, ClC-5 may accomplish two roles in the receptor-mediated endocytosis: i) vesicular acidification and receptor recycling; ii) participation to the non-selective megalin–cubilin-amnionless low-molecular-weight protein uptake at the apical membrane.[41]

Clinical significance[edit]

Dent diseaseis mainly caused byloss-of-functionmutations in theCLCN5gene (Dent disease 1; MIM#300009).[14][43]Dent disease 1 shows a markedallelic heterogeneity.To date, 265 differentCLCN5pathogenic variants have been described.[14]A small number of pathogenic variants were found in more than one family.[44]The 48% are truncating mutations (nonsense,frameshiftor complex), 37% non-truncating (missenseor in-frameinsertions/deletions), 10%splice site mutations,and 5% other type (large deletions,Aluinsertions or 5’UTR mutations). Functional investigations inXenopus laevisoocytesand mammalian cells[39][43][45][46][47][40]enabled theseCLCN5mutations to be classified according to their functional consequences.[8][44][48][49][50]The most common mutations lead to a defectiveprotein foldingandprocessing,resulting inendoplasmic reticulumretention of the mutant protein for further degradation by theproteasome.

Animal models[edit]

Two independent ClC-5knock-out mice,the so called Jentsch[51][52]and Guggino models,[53][54][55][56]provided critical insights into the mechanisms of proximal tubular dysfunction in Dent disease 1. These two murine models recapitulated the major features of Dent disease (low-molecular-weightproteinuria,hypercalciuriaandnephrocalcinosis/nephrolithiasis) and demonstrated that ClC-5 inactivation is associated with severe impairment of both fluid phase andreceptor-mediated endocytosis,as well astraffickingdefects leading to the loss ofmegalinandcubilinat thebrush borderof proximal tubules. However, targeted disruption of ClC-5 in the Jentsch model did not lead tohypercalciuria,kidney stonesornephrocalcinosis,while the Guggino model did.[53]The Jentsch murine model produced slightly more acidic urines. Urinary phosphate excretion was increased in both models by about 50%. Hyperphosphaturia in the Jentsch model was associated with decreased apical expression of the sodium/phosphate cotransporterNaPi2athat is the predominant phosphate transporter in the proximal tubule. However, NaPi2a expression is ClC-5-independent since apical NaPi2a was normally expressed in any proximal tubules of chimeric female mice, while it was decreased in all male proximal tubular knock-out cells. Serum parathormone (PTH) is normal in knock-out mice while urinary PTH is increased of about 1.7 fold. Megalin usually mediates the endocytosis and degradation of PTH in proximal tubular cells. In knock-out mice, the downregulation of megalin leads to PTH defective endocytosis and progressively increases luminal PTH levels that enhance the internalization of NaPi2a.[51]

DNA testing and genetic counselling[edit]

A clinical diagnosis of Dent disease can be confirmed through moleculargenetic testingthat can detect mutations in specific genes known to cause Dent disease. However, about 20-25% of Dent disease patients remain genetically unresolved.[44]

Genetic testing is useful to determine the status ofhealthy carrierin the mother of an affected male. In fact, being Dent disease anX-linked recessive disorder,males are more frequently affected than females, and females may beheterozygoushealthy carrier. Due toskewed X-inactivation,female carriers may present some mild symptoms of Dent disease such as low-molecular-weightproteinuriaorhypercalciuria.Carriers will transmit the disease to half of their sons whereas half of their daughters will be carriers. Affected males do not transmit the disease to their sons since they passY chromosometo males, but all their daughters will inherited mutatedX chromosome.Preimplantandprenatal genetic testingis not advised for Dent disease 1 since the prognosis for the majority of the patients is good and a clear correlation betweengenotypeandphenotypeis lacking.[57]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcGRCh38: Ensembl release 89: ENSG00000171365Ensembl,May 2017
  2. ^abcGRCm38: Ensembl release 89: ENSMUSG00000004317Ensembl,May 2017
  3. ^"Human PubMed Reference:".National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. ^"Mouse PubMed Reference:".National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  5. ^Scheinman SJ, Pook MA, Wooding C, Pang JT, Frymoyer PA, Thakker RV (June 1993)."Mapping the gene causing X-linked recessive nephrolithiasis to Xp11.22 by linkage studies".The Journal of Clinical Investigation.91(6): 2351–7.doi:10.1172/JCI116467.PMC443292.PMID8099916.
  6. ^Fisher SE, Black GC, Lloyd SE, Hatchwell E, Wrong O, Thakker RV, et al. (November 1994). "Isolation and partial characterization of a chloride channel gene which is expressed in kidney and is a candidate for Dent's disease (an X-linked hereditary nephrolithiasis)".Human Molecular Genetics.3(11): 2053–9.PMID7874126.
  7. ^Fisher SE, van Bakel I, Lloyd SE, Pearce SH, Thakker RV, Craig IW (October 1995). "Cloning and characterization of CLCN5, the human kidney chloride channel gene implicated in Dent disease (an X-linked hereditary nephrolithiasis)".Genomics.29(3): 598–606.doi:10.1006/geno.1995.9960.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-CC06-6.PMID8575751.
  8. ^abcScheel O, Zdebik AA, Lourdel S, Jentsch TJ (July 2005). "Voltage-dependent electrogenic chloride/proton exchange by endosomal CLC proteins".Nature.436(7049): 424–7.Bibcode:2005Natur.436..424S.doi:10.1038/nature03860.PMID16034422.S2CID4412965.
  9. ^abLudwig M, Waldegger S, Nuutinen M, Bökenkamp A, Reissinger A, Steckelbroeck S, et al. (2003). "Four additional CLCN5 exons encode a widely expressed novel long CLC-5 isoform but fail to explain Dent's phenotype in patients without mutations in the short variant".Kidney & Blood Pressure Research.26(3): 176–84.doi:10.1159/000071883.PMID12886045.S2CID41532860.
  10. ^abcHayama A, Uchida S, Sasaki S, Marumo F (2000). "Isolation and characterization of the human CLC-5 chloride channel gene promoter".Gene.261(2): 355–364.doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00493-5.PMID11167024.
  11. ^abTosetto E, Casarin A, Salviati L, Familiari A, Lieske JC, Anglani F (July 2014)."Complexity of the 5'UTR region of the CLCN5 gene: eleven 5'UTR ends are differentially expressed in the human kidney".BMC Medical Genomics.7(1): 41.doi:10.1186/1755-8794-7-41.PMC4105828.PMID25001568.
  12. ^Forino M, Graziotto R, Tosetto E, Gambaro G, D'Angelo A, Anglani F (2004)."Identification of a novel splice site mutation of CLCN5 gene and characterization of a new alternative 5' UTR end of ClC-5 mRNA in human renal tissue and leukocytes".Journal of Human Genetics.49(1): 53–60.doi:10.1007/s10038-003-0108-1.PMID14673707.
  13. ^abcdWu F, Roche P, Christie PT, Loh NY, Reed AA, Esnouf RM, et al. (April 2003)."Modeling study of human renal chloride channel (hCLC-5) mutations suggests a structural-functional relationship".Kidney International.63(4): 1426–32.doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00859.x.PMID12631358.
  14. ^abcdeMansour-Hendili L, Blanchard A, Le Pottier N, Roncelin I, Lourdel S, Treard C, et al. (August 2015)."Mutation Update of the CLCN5 Gene Responsible for Dent Disease 1"(PDF).Human Mutation.36(8): 743–52.doi:10.1002/humu.22804.PMID25907713.S2CID20127180.
  15. ^Lourdel S, Grand T, Burgos J, González W, Sepúlveda FV, Teulon J (February 2012)."ClC-5 mutations associated with Dent's disease: a major role of the dimer interface"(PDF).Pflügers Archiv.463(2): 247–56.doi:10.1007/s00424-011-1052-0.PMID22083641.S2CID15629352.
  16. ^Jentsch TJ, Günther W, Pusch M, Schwappach B (January 1995)."Properties of voltage-gated chloride channels of the ClC gene family".The Journal of Physiology.482(suppl): 19S–25S.doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020560.PMC1334233.PMID7730971.
  17. ^Okkenhaug H, Weylandt KH, Carmena D, Wells DJ, Higgins CF, Sardini A (November 2006)."The human ClC-4 protein, a member of the CLC chloride channel/transporter family, is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum by its N-terminus".FASEB Journal.20(13): 2390–2.doi:10.1096/fj.05-5588fje.PMID17023393.S2CID24433478.
  18. ^Mohammad-Panah R, Harrison R, Dhani S, Ackerley C, Huan LJ, Wang Y, et al. (August 2003)."The chloride channel ClC-4 contributes to endosomal acidification and trafficking".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.278(31): 29267–77.doi:10.1074/jbc.M304357200.PMID12746443.
  19. ^Meyer S, Savaresi S, Forster IC, Dutzler R (January 2007). "Nucleotide recognition by the cytoplasmic domain of the human chloride transporter ClC-5".Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.14(1): 60–7.doi:10.1038/nsmb1188.PMID17195847.S2CID20733119.
  20. ^Wellhauser L, Luna-Chavez C, D'Antonio C, Tainer J, Bear CE (February 2011)."ATP induces conformational changes in the carboxyl-terminal region of ClC-5".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.286(8): 6733–41.doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.175877.PMC3057859.PMID21173145.
  21. ^Zifarelli G, Pusch M (October 2009)."Intracellular regulation of human ClC-5 by adenine nucleotides".EMBO Reports.10(10): 1111–6.doi:10.1038/embor.2009.159.PMC2759731.PMID19713962.
  22. ^Grand T, Mordasini D, L'Hoste S, Pennaforte T, Genete M, Biyeyeme MJ, et al. (November 2009)."Novel CLCN5 mutations in patients with Dent's disease result in altered ion currents or impaired exchanger processing"(PDF).Kidney International.76(9): 999–1005.doi:10.1038/ki.2009.305.PMID19657328.
  23. ^Pusch M, Ludewig U, Jentsch TJ (January 1997)."Temperature dependence of fast and slow gating relaxations of ClC-0 chloride channels".The Journal of General Physiology.109(1): 105–16.doi:10.1085/jgp.109.1.105.PMC2217054.PMID8997669.
  24. ^abZdebik AA, Zifarelli G, Bergsdorf EY, Soliani P, Scheel O, Jentsch TJ, et al. (February 2008)."Determinants of anion-proton coupling in mammalian endosomal CLC proteins".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.283(7): 4219–27.doi:10.1074/jbc.M708368200.PMID18063579.
  25. ^Grieschat M, Alekov AK (March 2012)."Glutamate 268 regulates transport probability of the anion/proton exchanger ClC-5".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.287(11): 8101–9.doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.298265.PMC3318731.PMID22267722.
  26. ^Dutzler R, Campbell EB, MacKinnon R (April 2003). "Gating the selectivity filter in ClC chloride channels".Science.300(5616): 108–12.Bibcode:2003Sci...300..108D.doi:10.1126/science.1082708.PMID12649487.S2CID41474053.
  27. ^Yin J, Kuang Z, Mahankali U, Beck TL (November 2004). "Ion transit pathways and gating in ClC chloride channels".Proteins.57(2): 414–21.arXiv:physics/0401022.Bibcode:2004physics...1022Y.doi:10.1002/prot.20208.PMID15340928.S2CID14783347.
  28. ^Friedrich T, Breiderhoff T, Jentsch TJ (January 1999)."Mutational analysis demonstrates that ClC-4 and ClC-5 directly mediate plasma membrane currents".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.274(2): 896–902.doi:10.1074/jbc.274.2.896.PMID9873029.
  29. ^Picollo A, Pusch M (July 2005). "Chloride/proton antiporter activity of mammalian CLC proteins ClC-4 and ClC-5".Nature.436(7049): 420–3.Bibcode:2005Natur.436..420P.doi:10.1038/nature03720.PMID16034421.S2CID4389450.
  30. ^Accardi A, Walden M, Nguitragool W, Jayaram H, Williams C, Miller C (December 2005)."Separate ion pathways in a Cl-/H+ exchanger".The Journal of General Physiology.126(6): 563–70.doi:10.1085/jgp.200509417.PMC2266597.PMID16316975.
  31. ^Neagoe I, Stauber T, Fidzinski P, Bergsdorf EY, Jentsch TJ (July 2010)."The late endosomal ClC-6 mediates proton/chloride countertransport in heterologous plasma membrane expression".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.285(28): 21689–97.doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.125971.PMC2898453.PMID20466723.
  32. ^Stölting G, Fischer M, Fahlke C (2014-10-07)."CLC channel function and dysfunction in health and disease".Frontiers in Physiology.5:378.doi:10.3389/fphys.2014.00378.PMC4188032.PMID25339907.
  33. ^Obermüller N, Gretz N, Kriz W, Reilly RF, Witzgall R (February 1998)."The swelling-activated chloride channel ClC-2, the chloride channel ClC-3, and ClC-5, a chloride channel mutated in kidney stone disease, are expressed in distinct subpopulations of renal epithelial cells".The Journal of Clinical Investigation.101(3): 635–42.doi:10.1172/JCI1496.PMC508607.PMID9449697.
  34. ^abGünther W, Lüchow A, Cluzeaud F, Vandewalle A, Jentsch TJ (July 1998)."ClC-5, the chloride channel mutated in Dent's disease, colocalizes with the proton pump in endocytotically active kidney cells".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.95(14): 8075–80.Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.8075G.doi:10.1073/pnas.95.14.8075.PMC20931.PMID9653142.
  35. ^Luyckx VA, Goda FO, Mount DB, Nishio T, Hall A, Hebert SC, et al. (November 1998). "Intrarenal and subcellular localization of rat CLC5".The American Journal of Physiology.275(5): F761-9.doi:10.1152/ajprenal.1998.275.5.F761.PMID9815133.
  36. ^Lamb FS, Clayton GH, Liu BX, Smith RL, Barna TJ, Schutte BC (March 1999). "Expression of CLCN voltage-gated chloride channel genes in human blood vessels".Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology.31(3): 657–66.doi:10.1006/jmcc.1998.0901.PMID10198195.
  37. ^von Weikersthal SF, Barrand MA, Hladky SB (April 1999)."Functional and molecular characterization of a volume-sensitive chloride current in rat brain endothelial cells".The Journal of Physiology.516 ( Pt 1) (Pt 1): 75–84.doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.075aa.x.PMC2269222.PMID10066924.
  38. ^abDevuyst O, Christie PT, Courtoy PJ, Beauwens R, Thakker RV (February 1999)."Intra-renal and subcellular distribution of the human chloride channel, CLC-5, reveals a pathophysiological basis for Dent's disease".Human Molecular Genetics.8(2): 247–57.doi:10.1093/hmg/8.2.247.PMID9931332.
  39. ^abSmith AJ, Lippiat JD (June 2010)."Direct endosomal acidification by the outwardly rectifying CLC-5 Cl(-)/H(+) exchanger".The Journal of Physiology.588(Pt 12): 2033–45.doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.188540.PMC2911210.PMID20421284.
  40. ^abNovarino G, Weinert S, Rickheit G, Jentsch TJ (June 2010)."Endosomal chloride-proton exchange rather than chloride conductance is crucial for renal endocytosis".Science.328(5984): 1398–401.Bibcode:2010Sci...328.1398N.doi:10.1126/science.1188070.PMID20430975.S2CID206525928.
  41. ^abHryciw DH, Wang Y, Devuyst O, Pollock CA, Poronnik P, Guggino WB (October 2003)."Cofilin interacts with ClC-5 and regulates albumin uptake in proximal tubule cell lines".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.278(41): 40169–76.doi:10.1074/jbc.M307890200.PMID12904289.
  42. ^Wang Y, Cai H, Cebotaru L, Hryciw DH, Weinman EJ, Donowitz M, et al. (October 2005)."ClC-5: role in endocytosis in the proximal tubule"(PDF).American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology.289(4): F850-62.doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00011.2005.PMID15942052.
  43. ^abLloyd SE, Pearce SH, Fisher SE, Steinmeyer K, Schwappach B, Scheinman SJ, et al. (February 1996). "A common molecular basis for three inherited kidney stone diseases".Nature.379(6564): 445–9.Bibcode:1996Natur.379..445L.doi:10.1038/379445a0.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-CBFE-2.PMID8559248.S2CID4364656.
  44. ^abcLieske JC, Milliner DS, Beara-Lasic L, Harris P, Cogal A, Abrash E (1993), Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE (eds.),"Dent Disease",GeneReviews®,University of Washington, Seattle,PMID22876375,retrieved2020-02-28
  45. ^Lloyd SE, Gunther W, Pearce SH, Thomson A, Bianchi ML, Bosio M, et al. (August 1997)."Characterisation of renal chloride channel, CLCN5, mutations in hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis (kidney stones) disorders".Human Molecular Genetics.6(8): 1233–9.doi:10.1093/hmg/6.8.1233.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0012-CBEE-8.PMID9259268.
  46. ^Grand T, L'Hoste S, Mordasini D, Defontaine N, Keck M, Pennaforte T, et al. (April 2011)."Heterogeneity in the processing of CLCN5 mutants related to Dent disease"(PDF).Human Mutation.32(4): 476–83.doi:10.1002/humu.21467.PMID21305656.S2CID25637790.
  47. ^Gorvin CM, Wilmer MJ, Piret SE, Harding B, van den Heuvel LP, Wrong O, et al. (April 2013)."Receptor-mediated endocytosis and endosomal acidification is impaired in proximal tubule epithelial cells of Dent disease patients".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.110(17): 7014–9.Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.7014G.doi:10.1073/pnas.1302063110.PMC3637698.PMID23572577.
  48. ^D'Antonio C, Molinski S, Ahmadi S, Huan LJ, Wellhauser L, Bear CE (June 2013). "Conformational defects underlie proteasomal degradation of Dent's disease-causing mutants of ClC-5".The Biochemical Journal.452(3): 391–400.doi:10.1042/BJ20121848.PMID23566014.
  49. ^Smith AJ, Reed AA, Loh NY, Thakker RV, Lippiat JD (February 2009)."Characterization of Dent's disease mutations of CLC-5 reveals a correlation between functional and cell biological consequences and protein structure".American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology.296(2): F390-7.doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90526.2008.PMC2643861.PMID19019917.
  50. ^Ludwig M, Doroszewicz J, Seyberth HW, Bökenkamp A, Balluch B, Nuutinen M, et al. (July 2005). "Functional evaluation of Dent's disease-causing mutations: implications for ClC-5 channel trafficking and internalization".Human Genetics.117(2–3): 228–37.doi:10.1007/s00439-005-1303-2.PMID15895257.S2CID34623611.
  51. ^abPiwon N, Günther W, Schwake M, Bösl MR, Jentsch TJ (November 2000). "ClC-5 Cl- -channel disruption impairs endocytosis in a mouse model for Dent's disease".Nature.408(6810): 369–73.Bibcode:2000Natur.408..369P.doi:10.1038/35042597.PMID11099045.S2CID4404338.
  52. ^Günther W, Piwon N, Jentsch TJ (January 2003). "The ClC-5 chloride channel knock-out mouse - an animal model for Dent's disease".Pflügers Archiv.445(4): 456–62.doi:10.1007/s00424-002-0950-6.PMID12548389.S2CID828209.
  53. ^abWang SS, Devuyst O, Courtoy PJ, Wang XT, Wang H, Wang Y, et al. (December 2000)."Mice lacking renal chloride channel, CLC-5, are a model for Dent's disease, a nephrolithiasis disorder associated with defective receptor-mediated endocytosis".Human Molecular Genetics.9(20): 2937–45.doi:10.1093/hmg/9.20.2937.PMID11115837.
  54. ^Silva IV, Cebotaru V, Wang H, Wang XT, Wang SS, Guo G, et al. (April 2003). "The ClC-5 knockout mouse model of Dent's disease has renal hypercalciuria and increased bone turnover".Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.18(4): 615–23.doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.4.615.PMID12674322.S2CID26450102.
  55. ^Christensen EI, Devuyst O, Dom G, Nielsen R, Van der Smissen P, Verroust P, et al. (July 2003)."Loss of chloride channel ClC-5 impairs endocytosis by defective trafficking of megalin and cubilin in kidney proximal tubules".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.100(14): 8472–7.Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.8472C.doi:10.1073/pnas.1432873100.PMC166253.PMID12815097.
  56. ^Nielsen R, Courtoy PJ, Jacobsen C, Dom G, Lima WR, Jadot M, et al. (March 2007)."Endocytosis provides a major alternative pathway for lysosomal biogenesis in kidney proximal tubular cells".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.104(13): 5407–12.Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.5407N.doi:10.1073/pnas.0700330104.PMC1838438.PMID17369355.
  57. ^Devuyst O, Thakker RV (October 2010)."Dent's disease".Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.5(1): 28.doi:10.1186/1750-1172-5-28.PMC2964617.PMID20946626.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

This article incorporates text from theUnited States National Library of Medicine,which is in thepublic domain.