Cadency

Charges used as marks of cadency in English heraldry: 1:labelof three points; 2:crescent;3:mullet;4:martlet;5:annulet;6:fleur-de-lys;7:rose;8:cross moline;9:octofoil

Inheraldry,cadencyis any systematic way to distinguisharmsdisplayed bydescendantsof the holder of acoat of armswhen those family members have not been granted arms in their own right. Cadency is necessary in heraldic systems in which a given design may be owned by only one person at any time, generally the head of the senior line of a particular family.

As anarmiger'sarms may be used 'by courtesy', either by children or spouses, while they are still living, some form of differencing may be required so as not to confuse them with the originalundifferencedor "plain coat" arms. Historically, arms were only heritable by males, and therefore cadency marks had no relevance to daughters; in the modern era, Canadian and Irish heraldry include daughters in cadency.

These differences are formed by adding to the arms small and inconspicuous marks calledbrisures,similar tochargesbut smaller. They are typically placed on thefesspoint (the centre of the field), or in chief (the upper part of the field) in the case of the label.Brisures are generally exempt from therule of tincture.One of the best examples of usage from the medieval period is shown on the seven Beauchamp cadets in the stained-glass windows ofSt Mary's Church,Warwick.

Background

Historically, it was recognised that there was a need to difference the arms of the head of the family from those of cadets. This need was recognised in Europe during the 14th century; various means to accomplish this were used.

In the modern era, differencing arms is generally rarely done in continental Europe. It is only in Scotland where the need to difference cadets is enforced.

Ways of differencing

In heraldry's early period, uniqueness of arms was obtained by a wide variety of ways, including:

• changingtincture
• adding alabelor bordure
• adding, removing, or replacing anordinary.
• varying thelines of partitionof an ordinary
• the use ofbrisuresor marks of difference

SeeArmorial of CapetiansandArmorial of Plantagenetfor an illustration of the variety.

Systems derived from English and Scottish usage

Systematic cadency schemes later developed in England and Scotland, but while in England they are voluntary (and not always observed), in Scotland they are enforced through the statutorily required process of matriculation in the Public Register.

England

The English system of cadency allowsnuclear familymembers to personally use the arms of the head of that family 'by courtesy'. This involves the addition of abrisure,or mark of difference to the original coat of arms. The brisure identifies the bearer's family relationship to the actual bearer of the arms. Although there is some debate over how strictly the system should be followed, the accepted system is shown below:

	First son	Second son	Third son	Fourth son	Fifth son	Sixth son	Seventh son	Eighth son	Ninth son
family member
	labelof three points	crescent	mullet	martlet	annulet	fleur-de-lys	rose	cross moline	doublequatrefoil

Arms of theEarl of Straffordfrom the Byng family (on the left) and of theViscount Byng of Vimy(on the right), incorporating acrescent,the mark of cadency for the second son.

The arms of the firstEarl Russell,who was the third son of the sixthDuke of Bedford,were given amullet argentover the central escallop to differentiate them from his paternal arms. The arms of the firstBaron Ampthill,who was third son of the ninth Duke of Bedford, were also marked with a mullet for difference, but in a different tincture.

Arms of theViscount Cobhamfrom theLyttelton family(on the left) and of theViscount Chandos(on the right), incorporating across moline,the mark of cadency for the eighth son.

Arms ofEdward Howard-GibbonandGeorge Wyndham, 1st Baron Leconfield,incorporating abordure wavy,the mark of an illegitimate child.

Daughters have no special brisures, and normally use their father's arms on alozenge,which includes any marks of cadency their father may use. This is because English heraldry has no requirement that women's arms be unique. Upon marriage, theyimpaletheir father's arms to thesinisterwith those of their husband to thedexter.However, if the woman happens to be aheraldic heiress,her father's arms are borne on aninescutcheonon her husband's arms.

In England, arms are generally the property of their owner from birth, subject to the use of the appropriate mark of cadency. Therefore, it is not necessary to wait for the death of the previous generation before arms are inherited.

The eldest son of an eldest son uses alabelof five points. Other grandchildren combine the brisure of their father with the relevant brisure of their own. This could lead to confusion, as both an uncle and nephew could have the same cadency mark. In a short number of generations, the accumulation of cadency marks—to show, for example, the fifth son of a third son of a second son—could lead to added complexity. In practice, cadency marks are not much used in England, and even when they are, it is rare to see more than one or two on a coat of arms.

At times, arms with a cadency mark may be used on a hereditary basis. For instance, the arms of theEarls Russellare those of theDuke of Bedforddifferenced by a mullet, as the1st Earlwas the third son of the6th Duke.

Although most heraldic texts follow on the English system of cadency set out above, most heraldic examples (whether on old bookplates, church monuments, silver and the like) ignore cadency marks altogether.Oswald Barronnoted:

Now and again we see a second son obeying the book-rules and putting a crescent in his shield or a third son displaying a molet, but long before our own times the practice was disregarded, and the most remote kinsman of a gentle house displayed the "whole coat" of the head of his family.

Nor have cadency marks usually been insisted upon by theCollege of Arms,the heraldic authority for England, Wales and formerly Ireland. For example, a statement on their website refers to the optional nature of cadency marks:

The arms of a man pass equally to all his legitimate children, irrespective of their order of birth. Cadency marks may be used to identify the arms of brothers, in a system said to have been invented byJohn Writhe,Garter,in about 1500. Small symbols are painted on the shield, usually in a contrasting tincture at the top.

In correspondence published in theHeraldry Society's newsletter,Garter King of ArmsPeter Gwynn-Jonesfirmly rejected a suggestion that cadency marks should be strictly enforced. He said:

I have never favoured the system of cadency unless there is a need to mark out distinct branches of a particular family. To use cadency marks for each and every generation is something of a nonsense as it results in a pile of indecipherable marks set one above the other. I therefore adhere to the view that they should be used sparingly.

In a second letter published at the same time, he wrote:

Unfortunately, compulsion is not the way ahead for twenty-first century heraldry. However, official recognition and certification of any Armorial Bearings can only be effected when the person in whose favour the Arms are being recognized or certified appears in the appropriate book of record at the College of Arms. I believe it right in England and Wales for a branch to use cadency marks sparingly and only if they wish to do so.

Adopted children

Clarenceux King of ArmsJohn Brooke-Littlewrote that "adoptedchildren may be granted the arms of their adoptive father, but a Royal License must be sought, and the arms, when granted, are differences by the addition of two links of a chain interlaced, either fesswise or palewise... "

Scotland

The system is very different in Scotland, where every male user of a coat of arms may only use arms recorded, or "matriculated", in the Public Register with a personal variation, appropriate to that person's position in their family, approved by the heraldic authority for Scotland, theLord Lyon.This means that in Scotland no two men can ever simultaneously bear the same arms, even by accident, if they have submitted their position to the Scottish heraldic authorities (which not all do in practice, in Scotland as in England); if they have not done so, the matter falls under statute law and may result in proceedings in the Lyon Court, which is part of the Scots criminal justice system. To this extent, thelaw of armsis stricter in Scotland than in England where the only legal action possible is a civil action in the Court of Chivalry, which sits extremely rarely and is not an integrated part of the English justice system.

Scotland, like England, uses thelabelof three points for the eldest son (or female heir presumptive)and a label of five points for the eldest son of the eldest son, and allows the label to be removed as the bearer of the plain coat dies and the eldest son succeeds.

Differencing system in Scottish heraldry

For cadets other than immediate heirs, Scottish cadency uses a complex and versatile system, applying different kinds of changes in each generation. First, abordureis added in a differenttincturefor each brother. In subsequent generations the bordure may be divided in two tinctures; the edge of the bordure, or of anordinaryin the base coat, may be changed from straight to indented, engrailed or invected;chargesmay be added. These variations allow the family tree to be expressed clearly and unambiguously. The system outlined here is a very rough version that gives a flavour of the real thing.

In the Scots heraldic system (which has little to do with the clan system), only one bearer of any given surname may bear plain arms. Other armigerous persons with the same surname usually have arms derived from the same plain coat; though if actual kinship cannot be established, they must be differenced in a way other than the cadency system mentioned above. This is quite unlike the English system, in which the surname of anarmigeris generally irrelevant.

Canada

Canadian cadency generally follows the English system. However, since inCanadian heraldrya coat of arms must be unique regardless of the bearer's sex, Canada has developed a series of brisures for daughters unique to Canada:

• for the first daughter, aheart;
• for the second daughter, anerminespot;
• for the third daughter, asnowflake;
• for the fourth daughter, a fir twig;
• for the fifth daughter, achess rook
• for the sixth daughter, anescallop(scallop shell);
• for the seventh daughter, aharp;
• for the eighth daughter, abuckle;
• for the ninth daughter, aclarion.

The actual practice in Canada is far from the rigidity suggested by the list of differences above – and is best seen in action in the Canadian Public Register – see for example the coats of variousArmstrongs,RavignatsandBradfords.

South Africa

Personal arms registered at theBureau of Heraldrymay be differenced upon matriculation (which is voluntary). Current policy is that younger children's arms must be differenced if they are matriculated. Methods used include the English and Scottish systems, the substitution of different charges, the changing of lines, and the changing of tinctures and or adding a border to the shield.

Ireland

The brisures used in the arms granted by the Chief Herald of the Republic of Ireland are identical to the brisures used by the system used in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, but unlike the English system, which only uses these brisures for the sons of an armiger in order of birth, the Irish system applies them to all the children of the armiger, irrespective of sex, and, as illegitimacy has no place in Irish heraldry, these marks are assigned to (recognised) children born outside of marriage as well as inside.

British royal family

Main article:Cadency labels of the British royal family

• 
  Arms ofThe King
• 
  Arms ofThe King(in Scotland)
• 
  Arms of thePrince of Wales
• 
  Arms of thePrince of Wales(in Scotland, asDuke of Rothesay)
• 
  Arms of theDuke of Sussex
• 
  Arms of theDuke of York
• 
  Arms ofPrincess Beatrice
• 
  Arms ofPrincess Eugenie
• 
  Arms of theDuke of Edinburgh
• 
  Arms of thePrincess Royal
• 
  Arms of theDuke of Gloucester
• 
  Arms of theDuke of Kent
• 
  Arms ofPrince Michael
• 
  Arms ofPrincess Alexandra

There are no actual "rules" for members of theroyal family,because their arms are theoretically decidedad hocby the monarch. In practice, however, a number of traditions are practically invariably followed. At birth, members of the royal family have no arms. At some point during their lives, generally at the age of eighteen, they may be granted arms of their own. These will always be the "arms of dominion"of the monarch with alabelargentfor difference; the label may have three or five points. Since this is in theory a new grant, the label is applied not only to the shield but also to thecrestand the supporters to ensure uniqueness. Thoughde factoin English heraldry the crest is uncharged (although it is supposed to be in theory), as it would accumulate more and more cadency marks with each generation, the marks eventually becoming indistinguishable, the crests of the royal family are always shown as charged.

EachPrince of Walesuses a plain white label and (since 1911) aninescutcheonof the ancientarms of the Principality of Wales.Traditionally, the other members of the family have used a stock series of symbols (cross ofSaint George,heart,anchor,fleur-de-lys,etc.) on the points of the label to ensure that their arms differ. The label of theDuke of Sussexhas threescallopshells taken from the arms of his mother,Diana, Princess of Wales;this is sometimes called an innovation but in fact the use of maternalchargesfor difference is a very old practice, illustrated in the "border of France" (azure semé-de-lys or) borne byJohn of Eltham, Earl of Cornwall(1316–36), younger son ofEdward II of EnglandandIsabella of France.

It is often said that labels argent are a peculiarly royal symbol, and that eldest sons outside the royal family should use labels of a different colour, usuallygules.

Continental usages

France

Main article:Capetian Armorial

During the Middle Ages, marks of cadency were used extensively by armigers in France.By the eighteenth century, such marks were no longer used by the members of armigerous families, but were still used extensively by the members of the French royal family.

The French Revolution of 1789 had a profound impact on heraldry, and heraldry was abolished in 1790, to be restored in 1808 by Napoleon I. However, Napoleon's heraldic system did not use marks of cadency either; the decree of 3 March 1810 (art. 11) states: "The name, arms and livery shall pass from the father to all sons"although the distinctive marks of Napoleonic titles could pass only to the sons who inherited them.

No subsequent regime in France ever promulgated any legislation regarding marks of difference in heraldry, so they remain unused (except in the heraldry of sovereign houses, such as the former royal family, as can be seen below, or theHouse of Lorraine).

The former royal house

French royal arms before 1376 Azure semy-de-lys Or	French royal arms afterKing Charles Vsimplified it in 1376 Azure, three fleurs-de-lys Or	Arms of theDauphin of France

Examples of cadency:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Past usage

Arms ofPhilip Hurepel,Count of Clermont	Arms ofRobert I, Count of Artois	Arms ofAlphonse, Count of Poitiers	Original arms ofCharles, before becoming Count of Anjou and Maine
Arms ofCharles, Count of Anjou and Maine	Arms ofJohn Tristan, Count of Valois	Arms ofPierre, Count of Alençon	Arms ofRobert, Count of Clermont
Arms ofCharles, Count of Anjou and Maine	Arms ofLouis, Count of Evreux	Arms ofPhilip, Count of Poitiers	Arms ofCharles, Count of La Marche

The sons ofLouis VIIIandBlanche of Castileused golden castles on a red background (derived from the arms of Castile) as charges to difference their arms: for Robert, alabel;for Alphonse, asemyof castles; for Charles, abordure.This initial system of differencing was dropped in favor of a longer-lasting simpler system. Charles, the youngest son of Louis VIII, changed his arms in favor of the arms of France with a plainlabel gules.

The simpler system primarily used four marks of difference: thelabel,thebordure,thebend,and thebordure engrailed.The tinctures used were gules; acomponyof argent and gules; and argent. They occasionally came up with more unusual forms, such as abordure-label gulesand abordure gules charged with eightplates.

Arms granted toPhilip the Bold(Duke of Touraine)	Arms of Philip the Bold as Duke of Burgundy	Arms granted toCharles, Duke of Berry,brother of Louis XI	Arms of Charles as Duke of Normandy	Arms of Charles as Duke of Guyenne

Initially, the arms were attributed to the cadet. Thus, even whenPhilip the Boldexchanged hisappanageofTourainein favor ofBurgundy,he retained the arms he had received asDuke of Touraine,but quartered it with the arms of Burgundy. Another example isCharles, Duke of Berry,younger brother of Louis XI.

However, by the seventeenth century, arms became associated with titles. The bordure gules was associated with Anjou, and the label argent with Orléans. Thus, when a cadet exchanged his appanage, his arms changed.

Germany

German noble houses did not use cadency marks as systematically as their European peers.The sons of noblemen often bore their father's arms, and generally there was no obligation or expectation that they be differenced.

The most common means of differencing was the use of differentheraldic creststo mark apart otherwise identical achievements borne by different branches of a family. Other, less frequent forms include counter-changing or the replacement of individual tinctures, or the addition of ordinaries. Bordures and labels were used occasionally, though not doctrinally. Perhaps the most prominent German family to adopt a system of bordures was theHouse of Hohenzollern.

As a result of theHoly Roman Empire'sheavy fragmentation, which form saw more prominent use and when was also influenced by general trends and geographic proximity; for example, the heraldic tradition of theLow Countriesand theRhinelandsaw a great deal of influence by itsFrenchneighbor.

Italy

Former royal house

Arms of the head of the house, former Prince of Naples (or Piedmont)	Arms of his Heir; the Prince of Piedmont (or Naples)	Savoy-Genoa(extinct)	Savoy-Aosta

Denmark

Royal family

Arms of theKing	Arms ofChristian, Crown Prince of Denmark, these arms are identical to those of the King, but the external ornaments are different.	Arms ofPrince Joachim(the King's brother), identical to the arms of the King and Crown Prince, but the inescutcheon is parted per pale Oldenburg and Laborde de Monpezat, his father's family.	Arms of the sisters of Queen Margrethe II,Princesses Anne Marie(formerly Queen of the Hellenes) and Benedikte;also borne by the Queen prior to her accession. These arms are the same as those of the lateFrederik IX, only with differing external ornaments.

Belgium

Royal family

The following heraldic system was adopted by a royal decree in 2019. Prior to this the system of royal cadency was unclear.

Arms of KingPhilippeof Belgium	Arms of the Duchess of Brabant, the heir apparent PrincessElisabeth, Duchess of Brabant	Arms of a prince of Belgium, a descendant of KingLeopold I	Arms of a princess of Belgium	Arms of a prince of the Royal House of Belgium	Arms of a princess of the Royal House of Belgium

The Netherlands

Royal family

The following heraldic system was adopted by a royal decree in 1815 and was in effect until 1907.

Monarch	Prince of Orange(heir apparent)	Eldest son of the Prince of Orange	Second son of the monarch	Eldest daughter of the monarch

Since 1907, the system has differed. Wilhelmina further decreed that in perpetuity her descendants should be styled "princes and princesses of Orange-Nassau" and that the name of the house would be "Orange-Nassau" (in Dutch "Oranje-Nassau" ). Since then, individual members of the House of Orange-Nassau are also given their own arms by the reigning monarch, similar to the United Kingdom. This is usually the royal arms, quartered with the arms ofthe principality of Orange,and an in escutcheon of their paternal arms.

Since 1907, there is no system to delineate individual princes and princesses via their arms.

• 
  Arms of the King of the Netherlands
• 
  Juliana of the Netherlands& Oranje-Nassau Personal Arms, (escutcheon ofMecklenburg)
• 
  Arms of the children of Juliana of the Netherlands,Beatrix of the Netherlands& Oranje-Nassau and her sistersPrincess Irene,Princess MargrietandPrincess Christina(escutcheon ofLippe)
• 
  Arms of the children of Beatrix of the Netherlands, currently used byPrince Constantijn,brother of the King, and his children. These arms were borne by the King before his accession and also byPrince Friso,the King's other, late brother, before his marriage. (escutcheon ofAmsberg)
• 
  Arms for the children of King William Alexander of the Netherlands,Catharina-Amalia, Princess of Orange,Princess ArianeandPrincess Alexia(escutcheon ofZorreguieta).
• 
  Arms for the children of Princess Margriet of the Netherlands,Prince Maurits,Prince Bernhard,Prince Pieter-ChristiaanandPrince Florisof Orange-Nassau, van Vollenhoven (escutcheon ofVan Vollenhoven).

Portugal

The Portuguese systems of differencing have their origins in the regulations of KingManuel I,who ruled Portugal from 1485 to 1521. There are two systems, one for the non-Royal families and the other for the Royal House.

Noble families

The Portuguese system of differentiation for the noble non-Royal families is unlike any other cadency system. It is true that the brisure personalises the arms, however, since the Portuguese have an arbitrary choice of surnames, they may select any family name from the father's or mother's side of their genealogical table and a coat of arms, which does not have to coincide with it. Thus, the system of differencing only serves to show from which ancestral line the arms are derived. The head of the lineage uses the arms without a difference, but should he be the head of more than one family, the arms are combined by quartering. The heir apparent to the arms of the head of a lineage never uses a mark of difference.

Royal house

Further information:Portuguese heraldry

Arms of the Duke of Braganza, head of the Royal house	Arms of Isabel, Duchess of Braganza, wife of the Duke of Braganza	Arms of Don Alfonso, Prince of Beira and Duke of Barcelos, Eldest son of the Duke of Braganza	Arms of Infanta Maria Francisca, daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Braganza	Arms of Infante Dinis, Duke of Porto, younger son of the Duke of Braganza. The castle on the label is taken from the arms of his mother

Spain

Royal family

Armsof the King	Armsof Princess Leonor, Heiress presumptive

Sweden

Royal house

Arms of KingCarl XVI Gustaf	Arms of CrownPrincess Victoria,Duchess of Västergötland, eldest daughter ofCarl XVI Gustaf	Arms ofPrincess Estelle, Duchess of Östergötland,daughter ofPrincess Victoria	Arms of PrinceCarl Phillip,Duke of Värmland, only son ofCarl XVI Gustaf	Arms ofPrincess Madeleine,Duchess of Hälsingland, younger daughter ofCarl XVI Gustaf	Arms of Princess Leonore, Duchess of Gotland, daughter ofPrincess Madeleine

Further reading

• Fox-Davies, Arthur Charles (1909).A Complete Guide to Heraldry.London and Edinburgh: T.C. & E.C. Jack.
• Woodward, John (1892).A Treatise on Heraldry: British and Foreign.London and Edinburgh: W. & A. K. Johnson.ISBN9780804806947.