Jump to content

Caviar diplomacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A box of caviar

Caviar diplomacyis alobbyingstrategy ofAzerbaijan,consisting of costly invitations to foreign politicians and employees of international organizations to Azerbaijan at the expense of the host country.Caviardiplomacy also includes expensive gifts presented as "a tribute to the Eastern tradition."[1][2][3][4][5]

Terminology

[edit]

The term "caviar diplomacy" was first used in 2012, in a report by theEuropean Stability Initiative(ESI) – "Caviar Diplomacy – How Azerbaijan silenced the Council of Europe". It was noted in the report that this term is being used in informal conversations of Azerbaijani officials to describe generous gifts to foreign politicians.[2][6]

Investigation of the "European Stability Initiative"

[edit]
Robert Walter
Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu

According to the sources of the European Stability Initiative, Azerbaijan has a group of 10-12 friends inParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)and 3-4 people in the secretariat who receive at least half a kilogram of black caviar (the price on the market is more than 1300 euros per kilogram) as a gift four times a year. Many deputies are invited toBakuand during their visits receive, alongside the caviar, numerous other gifts including: expensivesilkcarpets, gold and silver items, drinks, caviar and money. In Baku, a common gift is 2 kg of caviar. According to the ESI, outside of PACE, there is no doubt about the state of democracy in Azerbaijan, which is characterized as semi-authoritarian even by its biggest supporters. Nevertheless, despite the fact that there were no opposition parties elected to the Azerbaijani parliament in 2010, the head of the PACE mission stated that the elections corresponded to international standards. According to the ESI, this can be explained only by "caviar diplomacy". The ESI cited an example of PACE discussions in its report, when Azerbaijan was publicly supported by its frequent visitors – British Liberal DemocratMichael Hancockand former Foreign Minister of EstoniaKristiina Ojuland,who, despite the obvious regression in human rights situation in Azerbaijan, the lack of free elections, as well as criticism from international human rights organizations, stated that there are no serious problems in Azerbaijan. The ESI also added to the list of "friends of Azerbaijan" the BelgianPaul Wille,Eduard LintnerfromBavaria,Mevlüt Çavuşoğlufrom Turkey,Robert Walterfrom Britain, and a number ofRussianrepresentatives.[2]

During the2008 presidential elections,PACE observers included a large group of frankly pro-Azerbaijani MPs. The variant of the statement on elections, prepared by the head of the group of observersAndres Herkel,containing critical remarks, faced the rejection of the pro-Azerbaijani group consisting of Michael Hancock, Eduard Lintner and Paul Ville. Herkel was forced to declare his resignation if criticism did not go into the statement. During the referendum, which lifted the limits on the number of presidential terms for Ilham Aliyev, four PACE deputies – Eduard Lintner, Paul Wille,Khaki KeskinandPedro Agramuntevaluated the referendum as the progress of democracy.[2]

In addition to PACE representatives, observers from theOffice for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights of the OSCE(ODIHR) who have extensive experience of such observations, which revealed numerous violations of the procedure, which exclude the possibility of choice, were also present at the 2010 parliamentary elections. During the meetings of European observers, attended by PACE representatives in the person of Paul Ville and PoleTadeusz Iwinski,the head of ODIHR observers,Audrey Gloverfrom Great Britain, noted numerous violations that were not contested by PACE representatives. Nevertheless, the preliminary result of PACE monitoring, presented by Paul Ville, noted the compliance of preparations for elections with international standards, as well as transparent and effective work of the organizers. During the election, ODIHR observers recorded[7]multiple violations and unprecedented ballot stuffing. By the closing of polling stations, the elections were assessed by the ODIHR as probably the most fraudulent they monitored. However, speaking onAzerbaijani television,Paul Wille stated that the elections were democratic and that he did not know about any violations. The ODIHR, in turn, subjected the elections to sharp criticism.

When asked if bribes were given to observers, Glover replied that she had not personally received one. After returning from Baku, a representative of the PACE groupWolfgang Grosruckfrom Germany accused Audrey Glover of being "unreliable", unprofessional, and also of not speaking out in defence of the PACE representatives when questions about bribes were asked. The ODIHR report published in January 2011 contained extremely critical assessments of the 2010 elections.[2]

Investigations of the ESI have received resonance in Russian and international media:EU Observer,[8]Politiken,[9]DR,[10]Radio Sarajevo,[11]BBC,[12]Der Tagesspiegel,[13]Africa Intelligence,[5]Neue Zürcher Zeitung,[14]The Guardian[1]and others.[15][16]

2013 Presidential elections

[edit]

On October 9, 2013, Ilham Aliyevwas electedAzerbaijan's president for the third time. Observers from the OSCE / ODIHR, led by Italian politicianTana de Zulueta,spoke of restrictions on freedom of speech during elections, while representatives of theEuropean Parliamentheaded byPino Arlacchiconfirmed free and fair elections.[17]The European Parliament and PACE issued a joint statement in which they highly appraised the elections. A group of observers from the US House of Representatives also acknowledged fair elections.[18]

Varying estimates of the elections led to a scandal. On October 11, the representative of the European Union,Catherine Ashtonand European CommissionerStefan Fule,ignored the assessment of the European Parliament, including in its statement the results of the ODIHR.[19]The Commission on Foreign Relations of the EU discussed the report of Arlacchi. During the discussion, representatives of the "green" condemned the report and said that it discredited the European Parliament. The head of theSocialists' factionin the EU said that the PACE report cannot be considered reliable at all. It later emerged that a number of EU representatives traveled to Azerbaijan unofficially and on the dime of Azerbaijani organizations, which was regarded byEuropean Voiceas "stupidity or corruption", these trips were labeled "electoral tourism".[20]

TheUS State Departmentin its turn discredited the observers from the House of Representatives, describing the elections as not meeting international standards, and expressing solidarity with the ODIHR's assessment.[21]

The turning point

[edit]

In 2015, during the discussion of the resolution on political prisoners in the European Parliament, the text written by the pro-Azerbaijani rapporteurs initially contained almost no criticism, but as a result, a resolution was adopted calling for Azerbaijan to stop repression of human rights defenders, revising the law on non-governmental organizations, not putting pressure on journalists and there was also a threat of sanctions.[22]According to the German deputyFrank Schwabe,this was a turning point for Azerbaijan's "caviar diplomacy".[23]

On September 10, 2015, the European Parliament adopted a resolution in which Azerbaijan was condemned for "unprecedented repression". The resolution also called on the European authorities to conduct a thorough investigation of allegations of corruption againstPresident Aliyevand his family members, and to consider imposing targeted sanctions against officials related to the persecution.[24]

Investigation of the Italian prosecutor's office and in PACE

[edit]

In June 2016, theMilanprosecutor's office brought charges of corruption and money laundering toLuca Volontè,the former head of theEuropean People's Partyfaction in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. According to the Prosecutor's Office Volonte received €2.39 million for the support of Azerbaijani officials. Volonte's lawyers called these accusations absolutely groundless. According to the second ESI report – "Caviar Diplomacy. Part 2", published in December 2016, Volonte agreed to cooperate with the investigation and named many European politicians who have been lobbying for the interests of the Azerbaijani authorities. During the interrogations Volonte confirmed receiving €2.39 million for lobbying in favor of Azerbaijan. According to the ESI, the money went to bribing Italian and other politicians who voted against PACE resolutions and reports condemning human rights violations in Azerbaijan.[25]In the documentary film shown onItalian television,Volonte also confirmed the receipt of €2.39 million, arguing that this money was transferred from a member of the Azerbaijani delegation to PACE Elkhan Suleymanov for consultations on agriculture. Payments to Volonte went through four British companies, which, according toThe Guardian,did not conduct any operations in Britain and probably are front companies.[26] Part of the money went through Volontè'sNovae Terrae Foundationto lobbiesIona Institute,CitizenGO(he was a member of its board), theECI Mum, Dad & Kids initiative against equal marriageandDignitatis Humanae Institute.[27]

The Milan prosecutor's office accused Volonte of two episodes: money laundering and accepting bribes. The court of Milan, having considered the second charge, recognized Volonte's immunity for this episode, as according to the Italian constitution, a deputy cannot be prosecuted for his professional activities.[28]Later, theSupreme Court of Italyreversed this decision and returned the case to the Milan Court, citing the fact that the article of the Constitution is not about using his or her position for personal enrichment purposes.[29]

Ex-ambassador of Azerbaijan to the European UnionArif MammadovtoldThe Guardianthat he spent about 30 million euros for the services of lobbyists as representative of the Azerbaijani delegation to the Council of Europe: "All members of the Azerbaijani delegation knew about this figure, although it never appeared anywhere. It was said, that the money is intended for bribing members of other delegations and the PACE as a whole." A number of PACE deputies said that they knew about proposals to bribe the European deputies.[30]

Elkhan Suleymanov, the representative of Azerbaijan in PACE, was called the "curator" of Volonte and other European deputies. The European press cites examples of how Volonte recalled his requests to the PACE, informing Suleymanov that "your every word is an order for me". Through the company, from which Volonte received his payments, in total of about one billion euros were conducted. Attempts by Armenian MEPs to raise the issue of corruption in PACE came up against the opposition of PACE President Pedro Agramunt, another subject of investigation of the "caviar diplomacy", who deprived them of their voice and prevented the investigation. Der Tagesspiegel qualifies this investigation as "the biggest scandal in the history of Europe". After the publication in the media, Thorbjorn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, called on Agramut to personally provide an independent external investigative body without any further delay. Agramunt and the leaders of the five political groups rejected the proposals of the CoE officialWojciech Sawicki,which sets out the conditions for an independent investigation. However, after the visit of Agramunt toSyria,the PACE Bureau expressed to him a vote of no confidence and in fact removed Agramunt from real power,[31]after which in April 2017 the Parliamentary Assembly formed a commission to investigate alleged corruption accusations.[32][33][30]Its report was published in April 2018.[34]In the course of several follow-up hearings to the report of the Assembly's Investigation Body (on 25 April 2018, 15 May 2018 and 27 June 2018) 4 PACE members[35]were deprived of certain rights and 14 members,[36]accused of accepting gifts and bribes from the government of Azerbaijan in 2013, were expelled from the Assembly's premises for life.[37]

After 4 different court hearings held between 2018 and 2019,[38]in January 2021, Criminal Section X of the Court of Milan sentenced Luca Volontè to four years in prison for taking bribes from Azerbaijani politicians.[39][40]

Investigations in Germany

[edit]

In March 2021 several Bundestag members and ex-members of the rulingUnion coalitionbecame subjects of criminal investigations on the initial suspicion of corruption, for receiving payments from theAzerbaijani Laundromatmoney laundering scheme,[41][42][43]while others were implicated in allegations of corrupt lobbying practices, which led to intense criticism from members of all parties in theBundestagand became known as the "Azerbaijan affair" (‹See Tfd›German:Aserbaidschan-Affäre) in Germany.[44][45]

In March 2019,Karin Strenz,a German parliament member from the rulingCDUparty, was fined for failing to notify theBundestagof additional earnings from Azerbaijan. Earlier, she had been included in the list of "Caviar diplomacy" lobbyists.[46][41]On January 30, 2021, the Bundestag stripped Karin Strentz ofparliamentary immunity,as she was accused of receiving bribes in the amount of at least 22 thousand euros to lobby for Azerbaijan's interests in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE).[47]The case involves also the ex-member of Bundestag fromCSUEduard Lintner, a former parliamentary secretary of state under the Minister of the Interior. According to the prosecutor's office, Lintner received about 4 million euros from Azerbaijan in the period from 2008 to 2016 and transferred a significant part of the money to individual PACE members, who were supposed to speak positively about the elections in Azerbaijan and oppose demands for the release of political prisoners in Azerbaijan.[48][42]

On March 4, 2021, the German Bundestag deprivedAxel Fischerof parliamentary immunity, who is being investigated by theBKAfor receiving money from Azerbaijan to lobby its interests in the Council of Europe.[49][50]

Vicereported on the involvement of CDU MPsAxel Fischer,Mark Hauptmann,Thomas BareißandOlav Guttingin the "Azerbaijan affair".[51]The article also reported on TV Berlin, a local Berlin channel that broadcasts "regime-friendly interviews" for Azerbaijan.[52]Other Union politicians who came under fire for their connections and support of Azerbaijan areNikolas Löbel,[53]Tobias Zech[54]andJoachim Pfeiffer.[55]

On January 29, 2024 German prosecutors brought bribery and corruption charges againstAxel FischerandEduard Lintner.[56][57]

Malta

[edit]

In April 2017, the Maltese press published documents according to which the top politicians ofMaltaand the wife of Prime MinisterJoseph Muscatreceived millions of dollars from a bank controlled byIlham Aliyev's daughterLeila.According to the editorial investigation, Joseph Muscat made a trip to Baku in 2015, after which he called on Europe to give an objective assessment of the positive processes in Azerbaijan.[58]

[edit]

In the aftermath of the2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war,the Azerbaijani government started arranging paid group trips for foreign journalists with the aim to disseminate Azerbaijan's narrative about theNagorno-Karabakh conflictand the recent war. Swedish journalist Rasmus Canbäck, who was offered such a trip but declined,[59]has written a series of articles about these trips.[60]His investigations are foremost about his colleagues in Sweden, but according to Canbäck similar trips have been arranged from several other countries, including Italy, France, Germany, Mexico and Peru.[60]The trips, often all-inclusive with paid air tickets, VIP treatment, accommodations at luxury hotels etc., were usually arranged by an intermediator such as the Baku Press Club or the Azerbaijani Association active in the respective country. A conspicuous detail about many of the journalists who were invited to visit the Azerbaijani controlled parts ofNagorno-Karabakhwas that they had no or very limited prior knowledge about the conflict.[61]

Based on his investigations and interviews with some of the Swedish journalists who participated in the trips, Canbäck writes that "the purpose of these trips is to spread an Azerbaijani view of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh and that the opportunity to ask critical questions or control who and where to meet people has been extremely limited."[60]Journalists who asked critical questions received "brusque answers", calling such questions as "typical Armenian" and "Armenian propaganda".[61]One of the interviewed journalists, mentioned that "It was not even possible to refer toAmnestyorHuman Rights Watch,because they were allegedly bought by Armenia and then the discussion was over. "[61]Canbäck's investigations resulted in criticism from media and journalist organizations, questioning the judgement of the participants and their journalistic ethics,[62]resulting in reprimands for some of the participants who either resigned from their positions or were suspended from any reporting which would involve issues concerning the Caucasus.[63]

[edit]

In 2023 the Swedish-German investigative platform Blankspot published several investigative reports about freewheeling trips made by several European Parliament members to Azerbaijan. The first report revealed that 2 MEPs,Engin Eroglufrom Germany andFranc Bogovicfrom Slovenia, who had previously voiced harsh criticism of Azerbaijan and its government, changed their stance and started praising it after participating in a partially paid trip to Azerbaijan without declaring it in accordance with transparency rules of the EU parliament.[64]Following this one of the members of the RUMRA-group (Bogovič is the co-chairman of the group) - German MEPNiklas Nienaßresigned, stating that "Trust and transparency are the basis of integrity, both have been brocken."[65]He subsequently said that he would "put this trip in the same basket asQatargate"and emphasised that" MEPs should pay for their own foreign trips to avoid suspicion of undue influence ".[66][67]

Later a report uncovered another paid trip Polish MEPTomasz Porębahad made to Azerbaijan after which, he also started voicing pro-Azerbaijani views. When asked why he had failed to declare the trip his lawyer said that he was freelancing in Azerbaijan.[68]Latvian MEPAndris Amerikssimilarly went to Azerbaijan and sang its praises, but the EU Parliament committee he claimed to represent had no idea he was there.[69]

Several publications have emphasised how these trips raise questions on the reliability of EU Parliament ethics codes and the importance to enforce them.[70][69]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abDoward, Jamie; Latimer, Charlotte (2013-11-24)."Plush hotels and caviar diplomacy: how Azerbaijan's elite wooed MPs".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-07-05.Retrieved2020-10-21.
  2. ^abcdeCaviar Diplomacy. How Azerbaijan silenced the Council of EuropeArchived2017-09-11 at theWayback Machine// ESI, 24 May 2012
  3. ^«Икорная дипломатия» Баку в сфере прав человекаArchived2016-03-04 at theWayback Machine// RFE/RL, 12.11.2013
  4. ^Council of Europe plagued by 'caviar diplomacy'Archived2017-07-30 at theWayback Machine// EURACTIV 23 03 2017
  5. ^abWill IOG go for Baku's 'caviar diplomacy'?Archived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// Africa Intelligence, 9 02 2017 г. "Baku's" caviar diplomacy "which consisted of buying the good graces of certain members of the Council of Europe"
  6. ^Thomas de Waal."Независимому Азербайджану — 25: начинается новая эпоха перемен и потрясений?".Carnegie Middle East Center.Archivedfrom the original on 2017-01-13.Retrieved2017-01-10.
  7. ^"Azerbaijan, Parliamentary Elections, 7 November 2010: Final Report".osce.org.Retrieved2021-01-14.
  8. ^Azerbaijani lobbyists target EU opinion Azerbaijani lobbyists target EU opinionArchived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// EU Observer, 24 May 2012
  9. ^Grandprix-værter stopper kritik med kaviargaverArchived2016-09-27 at theWayback Machine// Politiken, 26. MAJ. 2012
  10. ^Aserbajdsjan har held med kaviardiplomatiArchived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// DR, 26. MAJ. 2012
  11. ^"Azerbejdžanska kavijar diplomacija".Archived fromthe originalon 2016-03-18.Retrieved2017-08-28.
  12. ^Аналитики из Европы критикуют «икорную дипломатию» БакуArchived2016-09-27 at theWayback Machine// BBC, 13 июня 2012
  13. ^Die Kaviar-DiplomatieArchived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// Der Tagesspiegel, 22.10.2012
  14. ^Im Auftrag des DespotenArchived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 20.11.2012
  15. ^Europa: El lobby de los dictadoresArchived2015-08-05 at theWayback Machine// Proceso, 30 DE ENERO DE 2015
  16. ^«Икорная дипломатия» Азербайджана: в Совете Европы процветает коррупция?Archived2017-08-07 at theWayback Machine// Регнум, 26 Мая 2012
  17. ^Наблюдательная миссия ОБСЕ подвергла резкой критике выборыArchived2016-03-04 at theWayback Machine// RFE/RL, 10.10.2013
  18. ^Love Aliyev, love Aliyev notArchived2016-03-18 at theWayback Machine// Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, 17 October 2013
  19. ^Кэтрин Эштон и Штефан Фюле раскритиковали президентские выборы в Азербайджане// Регнум, 11 Октября 2013 (копия)
  20. ^MEPs must explain trips to Azerbaijan// EUROPEAN VOICE, 10/16/13 (копия)
  21. ^Azerbaijan Presidential Election (Press Statement)Archived2019-01-11 at theWayback Machine// U.S. Department of State, October 10, 2013
  22. ^The functioning of democratic institutions in AzerbaijanArchived2017-09-06 at theWayback Machine// Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 2062 (2015)
  23. ^Abschied von der «Kaviardiplomatie»?Archived2017-08-28 at theWayback Machine// Der Tagesspiegel, 02.07.2015
  24. ^EU and Azerbaijan: Breaking Up or Muddling Through?Archived2017-08-31 at theWayback Machine// Eurasianet, September 16, 2015
  25. ^Оппозиция потребовала от властей Азербайджана реакции на доклад о подкупе депутатов ПАСЕArchived2017-08-28 at theWayback Machine// Кавказский узел, 21 декабря 2016
  26. ^UK companies 'linked to Azerbaijan pipeline bribery scandal'Archived2017-08-28 at theWayback Machine// The Guardian, 31 December 2016
  27. ^Norris, Sian (21 June 2021)."The Money Men Behind CitizenGO's Anti-Rights Agenda".Byline Times.Retrieved13 November2023.
  28. ^Parlamentare che si vende una legge? Non processabile. La sentenza: «I suoi atti sono insindacabili, dibattimento inutile»Archived2017-08-04 at theWayback Machine// Il fatto quotidiano, 22 maggio 2017
  29. ^Corruzione, «immunità parlamentare non preclude perseguibilità». La Cassazione annulla proscioglimento VolontèArchived2017-09-03 at theWayback Machine// Il fatto quotidiano, 24 luglio 2017
  30. ^abFresh claims of Azerbaijan vote-rigging at European human rights bodyArchived2017-07-14 at theWayback Machine// The Guardian, 20/04/2017
  31. ^PACE Bureau declares 'no confidence' in Pedro Agramunt as PresidentArchived2017-09-06 at theWayback Machine// Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, 28/04/2017
  32. ^Совет Европы расследует возможный подкуп парламентариев Азербайджаном// DW, 24.04.2017
  33. ^Die Spur des GeldesArchived2017-09-10 at theWayback Machine// Der Tagesspiegel, 22.03.2017
  34. ^"Report of the Independent Investigation Body on the allegations of corruption within the Parliamentary Assembly"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 2018-04-25.Retrieved2018-04-27.
  35. ^PACE (16 May 2018)."Allegations of corruption within the Assembly: committee deprives four members of certain rights".Archivedfrom the original on 2020-09-26.Retrieved7 March2021.
  36. ^PACE (27 June 2018)."Committee deprives fourteen former members of the right to access Council of Europe premises".Archivedfrom the original on 2020-09-29.Retrieved7 March2021.
  37. ^"Council of Europe expels 14 members accused of corruption in Azerbaijan case - EU-OCS - European Observatory of Crimes and Security".eu-ocs.Retrieved2021-02-21.
  38. ^"Risultati della ricerca".Radio Radicale(in Italian).Retrieved2021-01-16.
  39. ^Ljubas, Zdravko."Italian Court Sentences Former Council of Europe MP for Bribery".occrp.org.Retrieved2021-01-16.
  40. ^online, Redazione Milano (2021-11-01)."Volontè (ex Udc) condannato a 4 anni di carcere per" tangenti "".Corriere della Sera(in Italian).Retrieved2021-01-16.
  41. ^ab"German Parliament Takes Azerbaijan Corruption Seriously – Finally".Human Rights Watch.2019-01-29.Retrieved2021-03-02.
  42. ^abWELT (2020-01-30)."Karin Strenz und Eduard Lintner: Razzia bei Unionspolitikern".DIE WELT.Retrieved2021-03-02.
  43. ^WELT (2021-03-04)."Bundestag hebt Immunität von CDU-Abgeordnetem Fischer auf".DIE WELT.Retrieved2021-03-07.
  44. ^"Aserbaidschan-Affäre: Der Diktator, die CDU, der Moderator und das Geld".vice(in German). 22 March 2021.Retrieved2021-04-18.
  45. ^"CDU/CSU-Abgeordnete verwickelt: Soziologe erklärt, wie Aserbaidschan EU-Politiker kauft".stern.de(in German). 26 March 2021.Retrieved2021-04-18.
  46. ^"Немецкий депутат оштрафована из-за связей с Баку – DW – 14.03.2019".dw.
  47. ^tagesschau.de."Aserbaidschan-Affäre: Unionspolitiker unter Korruptionsverdacht".tagesschau.de(in German).Retrieved2021-03-02.
  48. ^"Парламентариев ФРГ подозревают в получении взяток из Баку – DW – 30.01.2020".dw.
  49. ^"Член бундестага лишен иммунитета из-за азербайджанской аферы – DW – 04.03.2021".dw.
  50. ^"Korruptionsaffäre: Nächster CDU-Politiker legt Bundestagsmandat nieder - Windige Deals mit Aserbaidschan".merkur.de(in German). 2021-03-12.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-03-12.Retrieved2021-03-12.
  51. ^Felix Dachsel,Robert Hofmann (2021-04-01)."Aserbaidschan-Affäre: Die abenteuerlichen Reisen eines deutschen Staatssekretärs".vice.
  52. ^"How an Authoritarian Regime Infiltrated a Government in the Heart of Europe".vice.29 March 2021.Retrieved2021-04-19.
  53. ^Wolfgang Messner (2012-10-26)."Sponsorenaffäre bei der CDU Baden-Württemberg: Aserbaidschan finanziert den Landestag der Jungen Union mit".Stuttgarter Zeitung.Die Junge Union Baden-Württemberg sieht sich innerparteilicher Kritik und Vorwürfen vonAmnesty Internationalausgesetzt, weil das staatlich finanzierte Studentennetzwerk von Aserbaidschan beim JU-Landestag als Sponsor auftritt.
  54. ^"Aserbaidschan-Lobbyaffäre – CDU-Abgeordneter Fischer soll Ausschussvorsitz abgeben".Der Spiegel.17 March 2021.
  55. ^"Masken-Affäre: Alle Unionsabgeordneten unterzeichnen Ehrenerklärung".Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.12 March 2021.ISSN0174-4909.Retrieved30 March2021.
  56. ^"Axel Fischer soll Geld aus Aserbaidschan erhalten haben: Früherer CDU-Abgeordneter wegen Korruption angeklagt".Der Tagesspiegel Online(in German).ISSN1865-2263.Retrieved2024-02-05.
  57. ^"Azerbaïdjan: des élus allemands pris la main dans la boîte de caviar".Le Point(in French). 2024-01-31.Retrieved2024-02-05.
  58. ^Azerbaijan's First Family Accused in Maltese Corruption ScandalArchived2017-05-05 at theWayback Machine// Eurasianet, May 1, 2017
  59. ^"Granskning: Så arbetar en azerbajdzjansk påverkansorganisation".Blankspot.16 October 2021.Retrieved2023-12-09.
  60. ^abc"Bjudresorna till Azerbajdzjan fortsätter – ny grupp svenska journalister på plats".Blankspot.31 October 2021.Retrieved2023-12-09.
  61. ^abc"Gäst hos diktaturen".Blankspot.16 October 2021.Retrieved2023-12-09.
  62. ^"MARIA RYDHAGEN: Bjudresor till diktaturer är inget som bara händer".Expressen.11 November 2021.Retrieved2023-12-09.
  63. ^"PK Södras ordförande avgår efter Azerbajdzjan-resa".Journalisten.12 November 2021.Retrieved2023-12-09.
  64. ^"After a paid trip to Azerbaijan several EU parliamentarians stopped criticizing the regime".Blankspot.2022-12-07.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  65. ^"Niklas Nienaß statement".Twitter.2023-01-16.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  66. ^"[Interview] MEPs should fund own foreign trips, German Green says".EUobserver.2023-01-24.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  67. ^"After Blankspot's investigation about the paid trip to Azerbaijan: The co-chair of RUMRA resigns" they went behind my back "".Blankspot.2023-01-16.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  68. ^"[Investigation] Polish MEP also went on freelance Azerbaijan trip".EUobserver.2023-02-07.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  69. ^ab"[Investigation] No record of Latvian MEP's 'official' Azerbaijan trip".EUobserver.2023-01-27.Retrieved2023-03-16.
  70. ^"Evropski parlament se mora temeljito očistiti".delo.si(in Slovenian).Retrieved2023-03-17.
[edit]