Jump to content

Commagene

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commagene
Κομμαγηνή
163 BC – 72 AD
Map showing Commagene (light pink on the left) in 50 AD; nearby are Armenia, Sophene, Osrhoene, and the Roman and Parthian Empires
Map showing Commagene (light pink on the left) in 50 AD; nearby areArmenia,Sophene,Osrhoene,and theRomanandParthianEmpires
CapitalSamosata
Common languagesGreek(official)[1]
Persian(ruling dynasty)[2]
LocalAramaiclanguage
Religion
Greco-Iranianreligious syncretism[3]
GovernmentMonarchy
King
• 163–130 BC
Ptolemaeus
• 38–72 AD
Antiochus IV
Historical eraHellenistic Age
• Established
163 BC
• Disestablished
72 AD
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Kingdom of Sophene
Roman Empire
Today part ofTurkey
Anatoliain the early 1st century AD with Commagene as a Roman client state

Commagene(Greek:Κομμαγηνή) was an ancient Greco-Iranian kingdom ruled by aHellenizedbranch of theIranianOrontid dynastythat had ruled overArmenia.[4]The kingdom was located in and around the ancient city ofSamosata,which served as its capital. TheIron Agename of Samosata,Kummuh,probably gives its name to Commagene.[5]

Commagene has been characterized as a "buffer state"between Armenia, Parthia, Syria, and Rome;[6]culturally, it was correspondingly mixed.[7][8]The kings of the Kingdom of Commagene claimed descent fromOronteswithDarius I of Persiaas their ancestor, by his marriage to Rhodogune, daughter ofArtaxerxes IIwho had a family descent from king Darius I.[9][10]The territory of Commagene corresponded roughly to the modern Turkish provinces ofAdıyamanand northernAntep.[11]

Little is known of the region of Commagene before the beginning of the 2nd century BC. However, it seems that, from what little evidence remains, Commagene formed part of a larger state that also included theKingdom of Sophene.This situation lasted untilc. 163 BC,when the local satrap,Ptolemaeus of Commagene,established himself as an independent ruler following the death of the Seleucid king,Antiochus IV Epiphanes.[12]

The Kingdom of Commagene maintained its independence until 17 AD, when it was made aRoman provinceby EmperorTiberius.It re-emerged as an independent kingdom whenAntiochus IV of Commagenewas reinstated to the throne by order ofCaligula,then deprived of it by that same emperor, then restored to it a couple of years later by his successor,Claudius.The re-emergent state lasted until 72 AD, when the EmperorVespasianfinally and definitively made it part of theRoman Empire.[13]

One of the kingdom's most lasting visible remains is the archaeological site onMount Nemrut,a sanctuary dedicated by KingAntiochus Theosto a number of syncretistic Graeco-Iranian deities as well as to himself and the deified land of Commagene.[14]It is now aWorld Heritage Site.[15]

Cultural identity

Monumental head of the goddess Commagene (Tyche-Bakht) fromMount Nemrut
Antiochus I of Commagene,shaking hands withHerakles.

The cultural identity of the Kingdom of Commagene has been variously characterized. Pierre Merlat suggests that the Commagenian city ofDoliche,like others in its vicinity, was "half Iranianized and half Hellenized".[8]David M. Langdescribes Commagene as "a formerArmeniansatellite kingdom ",[7]while Blömer and Winter call it a "Hellenistic kingdom".[16]Millar suggests that a local dialect ofAramaicmight have been spoken there,[17]Fergus Millarconsiders that, "in some parts of the Euphrates region, such as Commagene, nothing approaching an answer to questions about local culture is possible."[18]

While the language used on public monuments was typicallyGreek,Commagene's rulers made no secret of their Persian affinities. The kings of Commagene claimed descent from theOrontid dynastyand would therefore have been related to the family that founded theKingdom of Armenia;[19]while Sartre states the accuracy of these claims is uncertain.[12]AtAntiochus Theos' sanctuary atMount Nemrut,the king erected monumental statues of deities with mixed Greek and Iranian names, such asZeus-Oromasdes,while celebrating his own descent from the royal families of Persia and Armenia in aGreek-languageinscription.[7]

The Commagenean rulers had Iranian and Greek names (Antiochus, Samos, Mithridates).[20][21]The various Iranian onomasticons located in Commagene demonstrate the extensive Iranization in the region.[22]Over the course of the first centuries BC and AD, the names given on a tomb at Sofraz Köy show a mix of "typical Hellenistic dynastic names with an early introduction of Latin personal names."[23]Lang notes the vitality of Graeco-Roman culture in Commagene.[6]

While few things about his origins are known with certainty, 2nd-century Attic Greek poetLucian of Samosataclaimed to have been born inSamosatain the former kingdom of Commagene, and described himself in one satirical work as "an Assyrian".[17]Despite writing well after the Roman conquest of Commagene, Lucian claimed to be "still barbarous in speech and almost wearing a jacket (kandys) in the Assyrian style ". This has been taken as a possible, but not definitive, allusion to the possibility that his native language was anAramaic dialect.[24]

In keeping with Commagene Greek and Iranian cultural elements, Antiochus' cult was a synthesis of Greco-Iranian religion, which had existed in Commagene before his time.[25]

History

Mithras-Helios, inPhrygian capwith solar rays, with Antiochus I of Commagene. (Mt Nemrut, 1st century BC)

Commagene was originally a smallSyro-Hittitekingdom,[26]located in modern south-centralTurkey,with its capital atSamosata(modernSamsat,near theEuphrates). It was first mentioned inAssyriantexts asKummuhu,which was normally an ally of Assyria, but eventually annexed as a province in 708 BC underSargon II.TheAchaemenid Empirethen conquered Commagene in the 6th century BC andAlexander the Greatconquered the territory in the 4th century BC. After the breakup of the Empire of Alexander the Great, the region became part of the Hellenistic Seleucids, and Commagene emerged in about 163 BC as a state and province in the Greco-SyrianSeleucid Empire.Perhaps Commagene was part of the kingdom of Armenia in the early Hellenistic period, and was possibly annexed to the Seleucid kingdom soon after Armenia's conquest[27][a]

The Hellenistic kingdom of Commagene, bounded byCiliciaon the west andCappadociaon the north, arose in 162 BC when its governor,Ptolemy,asatrapof the disintegrating Seleucid Empire, declared himself independent. Ptolemy's dynasty was related to theParthiankings, but his descendantMithridates I Callinicus(109 BC – 70 BC) embraced Hellenistic culture and married the Syrian Greek PrincessLaodice VII Thea.His dynasty could thus claim ties with bothAlexander the Greatand the Persian kings. This marriage may also have been part of a peace treaty between Commagene and the Seleucid Empire. From this point on, the kingdom of Commagene became more Greek than Persian. WithSophene,it was to serve as an important centre for the transmission of Hellenistic and Roman culture in the region.[6]Details are sketchy, but Mithridates Callinicus is thought have accepted Armenian suzerainty during the reign ofTigranes II the Great.[29]

Mithridates and Laodice's son was KingAntiochus I Theos of Commagene(reigned 70 –38 BC). Antiochus was an ally of the Roman generalPompeyduring the latter's campaigns againstMithridates VI of Pontusin 64 BC. Thanks to his diplomatic skills, Antiochus was able to keep Commagene independent from the Romans. In 17 whenAntiochus III of Commagenedied, EmperorTiberiusannexed Commagene to the province ofSyria.According to Josephus, this move was supported by the local nobility but opposed by the mass of the common people, who preferred to remain under their kings as before;[18]Tacitus, on the other hand, states that "most preferred Roman, but others royal rule".[30]

In 38 AD,Caligulareinstated Antiochus III's sonAntiochus IV[30]and also gave him the wild areas ofCiliciato govern.[31]Antiochus IV was the onlyclient kingof Commagene under theRoman Empire.Deposed by Caligula and restored again uponClaudius' accession in 41 AD, Antiochus reigned until 72, when EmperorVespasiandeposed the dynasty and definitively re-annexed the territory to Syria, acting on allegations "that Antiochus was about to revolt from the Romans... reported by the GovernorCaesennius Paetus".[32]TheLegio VI Ferrata,which Paetus led into Commagene, was not resisted by the populace; a day-long battle with Antiochus' sons Epiphanes and Callinicus ended in a draw, and Antiochus surrendered.[33]TheLegio III Gallicawould occupy the area by 73 AD.[33]A 1st-century letter inSyriacbyMara Bar Serapiondescribes refugees fleeing the Romans across the Euphrates and bemoans the Romans' refusal to let the refugees return;[34]this might describe the Roman takeover of either 18 or 72.[35] The descendants of Antiochus IV lived prosperously and in distinction inAnatolia,Greece,Italy,and theMiddle East.As a testament to the descendants of Antiochus IV, the citizens ofAthenserected a funeral monument in honor of his grandsonPhilopappos,who was a benefactor of the city, upon his death in 116. Another descendant of Antiochus IV was the historianGaius Asinius Quadratus,who lived in the 3rd century.

Geography

Commagene extended from the right bank of the Euphrates to the Taurus[36]and Amanus Mountains.Strabo,who counts Commagene as part of Syria,[37]notes the kingdom's fertility.[38]Its capital and chief city wasSamosata(now submerged underAtatürk Reservoir).

The boundaries of Commagene fluctuated over time. UnderAntiochus Theos,the Kingdom of Commagene controlled a particularly large area.[16]Dolichewas under Commagenian rule "for about 35 years";[16]after being governed by Antiochus Theos, it might have been incorporated into the Roman province of Syria as early as 31 BC.[23]Germaniceadeclared itself a Commagenian city in Roman times, although originally it was not.[16]On the other hand,Zeugma,while ruled for a time by Commagene, was popularly and traditionally considered to belong to the region ofCyrrhestica;[16]Strabo says it had been assigned to Commagene by Pompey.[39]

Archaeological remains

Eagle-topped column from the royal burial mound at Karakuş

The limestone propaganda-like statues and reliefs built during Antiochus Theos' reign reflect the Parthian influence in their sculpture.[40]

When the Romans conquered Commagene, the great royal sanctuary atMount Nemrutwas abandoned. The Romans looted the burialtumuliof their goods and theLegio XVI Flavia Firmabuilt and dedicated a bridge. The surrounding thick forests were cut down and cleared by the Romans for wood, timber and charcoal, causing much erosion to the area.[citation needed]

Another important archaeological site dating to the Kingdom of Commagene is the sanctuary of Zeus Soter at Damlıca, dedicated in the time of Mithridates II.[41]

In Commagene, there is a column topped by an eagle, which has earned the mound the nameKarakuş,or Black Bird. An inscription there indicates the presence of a royal tomb[42]that housed three women. The vault of that tomb, however, has also been looted. The main excavations on the site were carried out byFriedrich Karl Dörnerof the University ofMünster.Another royal burial site is atArsameia,which also served as a residence of the kings of Commagene.[43]

Many of the ancient artifacts from the Kingdom of Commagene are on display at theAdıyaman Archaeological Museum.[44]

Footnotes

  1. ^"Commagene was a district separate fromSeleucis,[28]bordering onCiliciaandCappadocia.Its natural borders were theTauruson the north and theEuphratesto the east. It occurs inAssyrianandHittiterecords asKummuhu.It was perhaps part of thekingdom of Armeniain the early Hellenistic period, and was possibly annexed to theSeleucid kingdomsoon after Armenia's conquest and partition into the kingdoms of Armenia and Sophene under Antiochus III. "— Butcher (2004)[27]

References

  1. ^Shayegan (2016),p. 13.
  2. ^Ball (2002),p. 436.
  3. ^Shayegan 2016,p. 13;Ball (2002),p. 436;Strootman (2020),p. 214
  4. ^Canepa 2010,p. 13;Garsoian 2005;Erskine, Llewellyn-Jones & Wallace 2017,p. 75;Canepa 2015,p. 80;Sartre 2005,p. 23;Widengren 1986,pp. 135–136;Merz & Tieleman 2012,p. 68;Ball 2002,p. 436;Shayegan 2016,pp. 8, 13;Strootman 2020,p. 205;Facella 2021;Michels 2021,p. 485;Toumanoff 1963,p. 278;Gaggero 2016,p. 79;Allsen 2011,p. 37;Olbrycht 2021,p. 38;Drower et al. 2021;Ferguson 2021,p. 170;Boyce & Grenet 1991,p. 309;Vlassopoulos 2013,p. 312;Crone 2012,p. 351;Graf 2019,p. III;Jacobs & Rollinger 2021,p. 1660;Russell 1986,pp. 438–444;Spawforth 2016;Sherwin-White & Kuhrt 1993,p. 193;Campbell 2015,p. 27
  5. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),p. 142.
  6. ^abcLang (1983),p. 510.
  7. ^abcLang (1983),p. 535.
  8. ^abPierre Merlat (1960). "Le site de Doliché".Jupiter Dolichenus: Essai d'interprétation et de synthèse.Presses Universitaires de France. p. 3.une de ces nombreuses localités mi-iranisées, mi-hellénisées d'Asie Mineure et de Syrie du Nord.
  9. ^Cook, J.M. (1993).The Persian Empire(Repr. ed.). New York: Barns & Noble Books. pp. 170, 173, 193, 212, 213, 216, 217, 221–223, 257, 263.ISBN978-1-56619-115-9.
  10. ^Hovannisian, Richard G. (1997).The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times - 2 Vols.St. Martin's Press, New York.
  11. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),p. 13.
  12. ^abSartre, M.,The Middle East under Rome(2007), p. 23
  13. ^Hazel, J. (2002).Who's Who in the Roman World.Psychology Press. p. 13.ISBN9780415291620.Retrieved20 February2014.
  14. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),pp. 10–11.
  15. ^UNESCO World Heritage Centre."Nemrut Dağ".Retrieved12 October2017.
  16. ^abcdeBlömer & Winter (2011),p. 19.
  17. ^abMillar (1993),p. 454.
  18. ^abMillar (1993),p. 452.
  19. ^Canepa 2010,p. 13;Garsoian 2005;Erskine, Llewellyn-Jones & Wallace 2017,p. 75;Canepa 2015,p. 80;Sartre 2005,p. 23;Widengren 1986,pp. 135–136;Merz & Tieleman 2012,p. 68;Ball 2002,p. 436;Shayegan 2016,pp. 8, 13;Strootman 2020,p. 205
  20. ^Curtis & Stewart (2007),p. 15.
  21. ^Cameron (2018),pp. 16–17.
  22. ^Jacobs & Rollinger (2021),p. 739.
  23. ^abMillar (1993),p. 453.
  24. ^Millar (1993),pp. 453, 456.
  25. ^Boyce & Grenet (1991),p. 347.
  26. ^Trevor Bryce (2012).The World of the Neo-Hittite Kingdoms: A Political and Military History.Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 110–114, 304.ISBN978-0-19-921872-1.
  27. ^ab Butcher, Kevin (2004).Coinage in Roman Syria: Northern Syria, 64 BC-AD 253.Royal Numismatic Society. p. 454.ISBN0901405582.
  28. ^Strabo,XVI.2.2
  29. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),pp. 24–25.
  30. ^abMillar (1993),p. 53.
  31. ^Millar (1993),p. 59.
  32. ^ Ewald, Heinrich (1886).The History of Israel.Vol. 8. Longmans, Green, & Co. p. 23.
  33. ^abMillar (1993),p. 82.
  34. ^Millar (1993),pp. 460–462.
  35. ^Anna F. C. Collar (2012). "Commagene, Communication and the Cult of Jupiter Dolichenus". In Michael Blömer; Engelbert Winter (eds.).Iuppiter Dolichenus: Vom Lokalkult zur Reichsreligion.Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. pp. 102–103.ISBN978-3-16-151797-6.
  36. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),p. 20.
  37. ^StraboXVI.2.2
  38. ^Strabo XVI.2, cited inMillar (1993),p. 53
  39. ^StraboXVI.2.3
  40. ^Colledge (1979),p. 229.
  41. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),p. 150-155.
  42. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),pp. 96–97.
  43. ^"Yeni Kale / Eski Kâhta - Türkei"(in German). 2011. Archived fromthe originalon 23 September 2015.Retrieved25 July2015.
  44. ^Blömer & Winter (2011),p. 124.

Sources

Further reading

  • Breitenbach, Alfred; Ristow, Sebastian (2006). "Kommagene (Euphratesia)." In:Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum,volume 21. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, coll. 233–273.
  • Blömer, Michael; Winter, Engelbert (2011).Commagene: The Land of the Gods between the Taurus and the Euphrates.Homer Kitabevi.ISBN978-9944-483-35-3.
  • Canepa, Matthew (2021). "Commagene Before and Beyond Antiochos I".Common Dwelling Place of all the Gods: Commagene in its Local, Regional, and Global Context.Franz Steiner Verlag. pp. 71–103.ISBN978-3515129251.
  • Messerschmidt, Wolfgang (2008). "Kommagene in vorhellenistischer Zeit." In: Winter, Engelbert (ed.),ΠΑΤΡΙΣ ΠΑΝΤΡΟΦΟΣ ΚΟΜΜΑΓΗΝΗ. Neue Funde und Forschungen zwischen Taurus und Euphrat.Bonn: Rudolf Habelt,ISBN978-3-7749-3517-4,pp. 1–35.
  • Wagner, Jörg (2012).Gottkönige am Euphrat. Neue Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in Kommagene.2nd edition. Mainz: Philipp von Zabern,ISBN978-3-8053-4218-6.

External links