Jump to content

Egbert (archbishop of Trier)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromEgbert of Trier)

Egbert
Archbishop of Trier
Egbert, fromhis psalter.In thispresentation miniaturehe presents the book toSaint Peter(in a facing portrait) in a characteristic statement of the indirectPetrine authorityof the See of Trier.[1]
ChurchCatholic Church
DioceseElectorate of Trier
In office977–993
Personal details
Bornc. 950
Died9 December 993

Egbert(c. 950 – 9 December 993) was theArchbishop of Trierfrom 977 until his death.[2]

Egbert was a son ofDirk II, Count of Holland.After being trained inEgmond Abbey,founded and controlled by his family, and at the court ofBruno I, Archbishop of Cologne,he became thechancellorofOtto IIin 976. The following year he was appointed to the archdiocese ofTrier,still probably in his twenties. He accompanied Otto II on visits to Italy in 980 and 983, and may have made other trips there. After Otto II's death in 983, he joined the party supporting the succession ofHenry the Quarrelsome,Duke of Bavaria,rather thanOtto III,but returned to supporting Otto in 985.[3]

Egbert was a significant patron of science and the arts, who established one or more workshops of goldsmiths and enamellers at Trier, which produced works for otherOttoniancentres and the Imperial court. Beginning with his tenure,Triercame to rivalMainzandCologneas the artistic centre of theOttonianworld. These were the three most important episcopal sees in Germany, who at this period disputed the primacy of the emerging German (East Frankish) kingdom between them.[4]

Efforts to secure the primacy of Germany

[edit]

To be established as thePrimate of Germanywould bring important political advantages, and increasing the prestige of his see through cultural means was probably an important element in Egbert's presumed role in establishing or encouraging artists and craftsmen to settle there. WhenOtto IIwas crowned inAachenin 961, all three archbishops had performed the ceremony together.[5]

In the traditional account, the battle for the primacy was in fact effectively lost in 975, two years before Egbert acceded to Trier, whenWilligis,the newArchbishop of Mainz,Egbert's predecessor as chancellor, where Egbert worked under him, obtained privileges fromPope Benedict VIIthat amounted to a primacy which later developments would confirm and formalize. There were also earlier privileges from 969 and 973. But as archbishop Egbert seems to have still been fighting a rearguard action, building on developments by his predecessor of the story of the origins of the see, in which a staff given bySaint PetertoEucharius,the supposed first bishop, played a large role. Trier was also the old Roman northern capital, still with abundant Roman ruins. However the authenticity of the Mainz privileges has recently been questioned, with some scholars now arguing that they were forgeries produced not long after Egbert's lifetime, so the question may have been more open.[6]The appearance, not recorded before Egbert's episcopy, of an actual staff alleged to be that Saint Peter gave to Eucharius, certainly deserves to be treated with great suspicion as a "brazen" fabrication.[7]Though apparently smoothed over, Egbert's initial support for Henry the Quarrelsome as successor to Otto II (who Willigis of Mainz had supported throughout) may have put paid to any chances he had of succeeding in his ambitions for primacy.[8]

Patron of the arts

[edit]
So-called "Egbert shrine" in theTreasury of Trier Cathedral
Detail of the Trier enamels and gold reliefs on thetreasure bindingfor theCodex Aureus of Echternach

Egbert was one of the most important Ottonian clerical patrons, and though he also built churches and monasteries, and no doubt commissioned wall-paintings and works in other media, the surviving pieces are in the form of metalwork with enamel andilluminated manuscripts.[9]The manuscripts were both inscribed and illuminated by monks with specialized skills, some of whose names are preserved, but there is no evidence as to the artists who worked in metal, enamel and ivory, who are usually assumed to have been laymen,[10]though there were some monastic goldsmiths in theEarly Medievalperiod, and somelay brothersand lay assistants employed by monasteries.[11]While secularjewellerysupplied a steady stream of work for goldsmiths,ivory carvingat this period was mainly for the church, and may have been centred in monasteries.

Metalwork

[edit]

The workshop Egbert is presumed to have established at Trier is the only Ottonian workshop producing enamels that can be clearly located. There are three main survivals of metalwork pieces certainly commissioned by Egbert, though contemporary literary references make it clear there was originally a large production, and both the three clear survivals and a larger group of objects often related to Trier both show "astonishingly little unity" in style and workmanship, which makes the confident attribution of other pieces such as theCross of Otto and Mathildevery difficult. The three clear survivals are the so-called "Egbert shrine", a reliquary casket andportable altarfor a sandal ofSaint Andrewand other relics, still in theTreasury of Trier Cathedral,the staff-reliquary of St Peter, now inLimburg CathedralTreasury, and the metalwork on thetreasure bindingreused for theCodex Aureus of Echternachsome fifty years later, having been donated by EmpressTheophanu.This last had possibly been given to Theophanu and Otto III to mark Egbert's reconciliation with them in 985.[12]Of these three pieces clearly attributable to Trier,Peter Laskowrote: "Each seems to have been made in a totally different workshop, using different sources, techniques, and principles of composition, and if the evidence for Archbishop Egbert as the donor for all three pieces were not so overwhelming, no one would have dared to attribute them all to one centre."[13]Elements such as enamel plaques were probably produced at Trier for patrons in other centres, as some surviving correspondence as well actual pieces suggest.[14]It has been suggested that, as there is little evidence of the Trier workshop after Egbert's death,Mathilde, Abbess of Essenrecruited it forEssen.

The staff-reliquary now in Limburg usesiconographyto promote the claims of the see of Trier, with sets of enamel plaques with portraits of the Apostles paired with those of the earliest bishops of Trier, and other sets matching popes with later bishops. There is evidence that "Egbert put the reliquary to frequent use" to relieve droughts and the like, and very likely to also to "brandish" it to increase his authority in synods and other important meetings.[15]

Manuscripts

[edit]
Thepresentation miniatureof theCodex Egberti,with Egbert's portrait

Egbert's major commissions of manuscripts seem to date from about 980 onwards, and it is unclear where they were produced; monastic scribes and illuminators may have been rather mobile between the major centres. Egbert commissioned the compilation of theRegistrum Gregoriifrom the letters of PopeGregory the Great,and produced a magnificently illuminated copy. The finest painter of this manuscript worked on a number of other books, probably at Trier and laterReichenau,and is known as theGregory Master,whose work looked back in some respects toLate Antiquemanuscript painting, and whose miniatures are notable for "their delicate sensibility to tonal grades and harmonies, their fine sense of compositional rhythms, their feelings for the relationship of figures in space, and above all their special touch of reticence and poise".[16]Egbert was also the recipient of theilluminated manuscriptCodex Egberti,showing an early form ofRomanesquestyle, which was probably produced at the up-and-coming centre of Reichenau, though the manuscripts associated with Egbert and with Reichenau at this period show something of the same confusing diversity of style as the metalwork.[17]

TheEgbert Psalter,which he commissioned for his own use inTrier Cathedral,was used a number of times after his death as adiplomatic gift,travelling as far as Russia and Hungary, and has been inCividale del Friuliin northern Italy since 1229.[18]A number of other manuscripts survive.[19]The miniatures in Egbert's manuscripts repeat many of the themes promoting the claims of the see of Trier that are found in the metalwork; in the psalter miniatures show the scribe (named as Ruodpreht) presenting the book to Egbert, who in turn presents it to Saint Peter. Thesquare halos(for a living person) given to Egbert in both the portraits illustrated here are one of the elements showing Italian influence on Trier miniatures.[20]A well-known miniature in theRegistrum Gregoriiof Gregory writing probably represents Egbert also, and the pairing of portraits of popes and bishops of Trier found on the Limburg staff also appears.[21]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Head, 73
  2. ^Public DomainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913)."Egbert, Archbishop of Trier".Catholic Encyclopedia.New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  3. ^Head, 76; Lasko, 95
  4. ^Lasko, 95; Dodwell, 134;
  5. ^Head, 65
  6. ^Head, 65–68
  7. ^Head, 71–73, 72 quoted
  8. ^Head, 76
  9. ^Dodwell, 134–144, especially 134; Beckwith, 96–104, 133–134
  10. ^Metz, 47–49
  11. ^An area where evidence is generally thin across Europe, see Cherry, Chapter 1
  12. ^Head, 76
  13. ^Lasko, 95–99, 96 quoted; Head deals with the first two objects; Beckwith, 133–135 for the book cover;Image of the foot reliquary.
  14. ^Metz, 45–46; Lasko, 95
  15. ^Head, 71–73, 72 quoted
  16. ^Dodwell, 141–142, 141 quoted
  17. ^Dodwell, 134–144 and see index, gives extended coverage; Beckwith, 96–104
  18. ^Beckwith, 97–98; Dodwell, 134–139
  19. ^Dodwell, 135, 139–144
  20. ^Beckwith, 98
  21. ^Dodwell, 135

References

[edit]
[edit]