Embedded journalism

An embedded civilian journalist taking photographs of US soldiers inPana,Afghanistan.

Embedded journalismrefers towar correspondentsbeing attached tomilitaryunits involved inarmed conflicts.While the term could be applied to many historical interactions between journalists and military personnel, it first came to be used in themedia coverage of the 2003 invasion of Iraq.TheUnited States militaryresponded to pressure from the country's news media who were disappointed by the level of access granted during the 1991Gulf Warand the 2001U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

Journalists who instead opted to cover the invasion of Iraq on the battlefield while unattached to any military force came to be called "unilaterals."Journalists chose to act as unilaterals to avoid the restrictions imposed on them by the military, and sometimes embed restrictions, which required embeds to stay with assigned units. Journalists sometimes opted to act as unilaterals out of concern that being under the constant protection of troops in the US-led coalition on the battlefield would bias their judgement in favor of coalition forces. The military often regarded unilateral journalists as sources of trouble on the battlefield and refuse to talk to them or not recognize unilateral journalists as "official" media.

The practice has been criticized as being part of apropaganda campaignwhereby embedded journalists accompanied the invading forces as cheerleaders andmedia relations representatives.

2003 invasion of Iraq

At the start of the war in March 2003, as many as 775 reporters and photographers were traveling as embedded journalists.These reporters signed contracts with the military promising not to report information that could compromise unit position, future missions, classified weapons, and information they might find.Joint training for war correspondents started in November 2002 in advance of start of the war.When asked why the military decided to embed journalists with the troops, Lt. Col. Rick Long of the U.S. Marine Corps replied, "Frankly, our job is to win the war. Part of that isinformation warfare.So we are going to attempt to dominate the information environment. "

Military control

The first journalist to run afoul of U.S. military rules in Iraq was freelancer Philip Smucker, travelling on assignment forThe Christian Science Monitorwith the1st Marine Division.Smucker was not officially embedded, but all reporters in the theater of war were deemed subject to Pentagon oversight. On March 26, 2003, during an interview withCNN,Smucker disclosed the location of a Marine unit, as he'd also done during an interview withNPR.He was thereafter expelled.

Four days later,Fox News ChannelcorrespondentGeraldo Riverasimilarly broadcast details from Iraq of the position and plans of U.S. troops. "Let me draw a few lines here for you," he said, making on-camera marks in the sand. "First, I want to make some emphasis here that these hash marks here, this is us. We own that territory. It's 40%, maybe even a little more than that." At another point, complained aCENTCOMspokesman, Rivera "actually revealed the time of an attack prior to its occurrence." Although Rivera—like Philip Smucker—was not officially embedded, he was swiftly escorted back to Kuwait.A week later, Rivera apologized. "I'm sorry that it happened," he said on Fox News Channel, "and I assure you that it was inadvertent. Nobody was hurt by what I said. No mission was compromised." However, a network review, he admitted, "showed that I did indeed break one of the rules related to embedment."

In December 2005 the U.S. Coalition Forces Land Component Command in Kuwait pulled the credentials of two embedded journalists on a two-week assignment for the Virginian-Pilot newspaper in Norfolk, Virginia, claiming they violated a prohibition against photographing damaged vehicles.

Criticism

Further information:Objectivity (journalism)

We were a propaganda arm of our governments. At the start the censors enforced that, but by the end we were our own censors. We were cheerleaders.

— Charles Lynch

Theethicsof embedded journalism are considered controversial.The practice has been criticized as being part of apropagandacampaign and an effort to keep reporters away from civilian populations and sympathetic to invading forces; for example by thedocumentary filmsWar Made Easy: How Presidents & Pundits Keep Spinning Us to DeathandThe War You Don't See.

Embed critics objected that the level of military oversight was too strict and that embedded journalists would make reports that were too sympathetic to the American side of the war, leading to use of the alternate term "inbedded journalist" or "inbeds". "Those correspondents who drive around in tanks and armored personnel carriers," said journalistGay Talesein an interview, "who are spoon-fed what the military gives them and they become mascots for the military, these journalists. I wouldn't have journalists embedded if I had any power!... There are stories you can do that aren't done. I've said that many times."

On June 14, 2014,The New York Timespublished an opinion piece critical of embedded journalism during both the U.S.military occupation of Iraqand thewar in Afghanistan.It was written by PVTChelsea Manning,the former U.S. Army intelligence analyst known for leaking the largest set of classified documents in American history. At no point during her 2009–10 deployment in Iraq, Manning wrote, were there more than a dozen American journalists covering military operations—in a country of 31 million people and 117,000 U.S. troops. Manning charged that vetting of reporters by military public affairs officials was used "to screen out those judged likely to produce critical coverage," and that once embedded, journalists tended "to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags" out of fear having their access terminated. "A result," wrote Manning, "is that the American public's access to the facts is gutted, which leaves them with no way to evaluate the conduct of American officials." Manning noted, "This program of limiting press access was challenged in court in 2013 by a freelance reporter, Wayne Anderson, who claimed to have followed his agreement but to have been terminated after publishing adverse reports about the conflict in Afghanistan. The ruling on his case upheld the military's position that there was no constitutionally protected right to be an embedded journalist."

Gina Cavallaro, a reporter for theArmy Times,said, "They're [the journalists] relying more on the military to get them where they want to go, and as a result, the military is getting smarter about getting its own story told." But, she added, "I don't necessarily consider that a bad thing."

Dangers

During both theIraq WarandWar in Afghanistan,improvised explosive devices(IEDs) were used extensively against U.S.-led Coalition forces, and accounted for the majority of Coalition casualties. Journalists travelling with ground forces were at the same risk.On January 29, 2006, while embedded with the U.S. Army's4th Infantry Division,ABC'sWorld News Tonightco-anchorBob Woodruffand cameramanDoug Vogtwere, together with an Iraqi soldier, seriously injured when their convoy was ambushed nearTaji, Iraq,and an IED detonated beneath them. At the time of the attack, Woodruff and Vogt were exposed, standing in the back hatch of their Iraqi mechanized vehicle taping a video log of the patrol.

See also

• Editorial independence
• Freedom of the press
• War correspondent
• Enemy Image,a documentary aboutThe Pentagon's approach to news coverage of war
• Generation Kill,a book about the experiences of an embedded journalist
• Weapons of Mass Deception[1],a documentary by former network journalist,Danny Schechter.Featuring appearances by many well known journalists includingRobert Young Pelton(who actually filmed the embed process and how the media worked).

External links

• Independent Media In A Time Of War-documentary by the Hudson Mohawk Independent Media Center
• "War reporters get battle training"
• "Flabby journalists sent to boot camp"
• "Eyes Wide Shut? The Impact of Embedded Journalism on Dutch Newspaper Coverage of Afghanistan"
• Military Reporters and Editors Association
• EmbeddedatSourceWatch