Jump to content

Exoskeleton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Discarded exoskeleton (exuviae) ofdragonflynymph
Exoskeleton ofcicadaattached to aTridax procumbens(colloquially known as thetridax daisy)

Anexoskeleton(from Greekέξωéxō"outer"[1]andσκελετόςskeletós"skeleton"[2][3]) is askeletonthat is on the exterior of ananimalin the form of hardenedintegument,which both supports the body's shape and protects theinternal organs,in contrast to an internalendoskeleton(e.g.that of a human) which is enclosed underneath othersoft tissues.Some large, hard and non-flexible protective exoskeletons are known asshellorarmour.

Examples of exoskeletons in animals include thecuticle skeletonsshared byarthropods(insects,chelicerates,myriapodsandcrustaceans) andtardigrades,as well as theskeletal cupsformed by hardened secretion ofstony coralsand the prominentmollusc shellshared bysnails,clams,tusk shells,chitonsandnautilus.Somevertebrateanimals, such as theturtle,have both an endoskeleton and aprotective exoskeleton.

Role[edit]

Exoskeletons contain rigid and resistant components that fulfil a set of functional roles in addition tostructural supportin many animals, including protection, respiration, excretion, sensation, feeding andcourtship display,and as an osmotic barrier againstdesiccationin terrestrial organisms. Exoskeletons have roles in defence from parasites and predators and in providing attachment points formusculature.[4]

Arthropod exoskeletonscontainchitin;the addition ofcalcium carbonatemakes them harder and stronger, at the price of increased weight.[5]Ingrowths of thearthropod exoskeletonknown asapodemesserve as attachment sites for muscles. These structures are composed of chitin and are approximately six times stronger and twice the stiffness of vertebratetendons.Similar to tendons, apodemes can stretch to storeelastic energyfor jumping, notably inlocusts.[6]Calcium carbonates constitute the shells of molluscs,brachiopods,and some tube-buildingpolychaeteworms.Silicaforms the exoskeleton in the microscopicdiatomsandradiolaria.One mollusc species, thescaly-foot gastropod,even uses the iron sulfidesgreigiteandpyrite.[citation needed]

Some organisms, such as someforaminifera,agglutinateexoskeletons by sticking grains of sand and shell to their exterior. Contrary to a common misconception,echinodermsdo not possess an exoskeleton and theirtestis always contained within a layer of living tissue.[citation needed]

Exoskeletons have evolved independently many times; 18 lineages evolvedcalcifiedexoskeletons alone.[7]Further, other lineages have produced tough outer coatings, such as some mammals, that are analogous to an exoskeleton. This coating is constructed from bone in thearmadillo,and hair in thepangolin.The armour of reptiles like turtles and dinosaurs likeAnkylosaursis constructed of bone;crocodileshave bonyscutesandhornyscales.

Growth[edit]

Since exoskeletons are rigid, they present some limits to growth. Organisms with open shells can grow by adding new material to the aperture of their shell, as is the case in snails,bivalves,and other molluscans. A true exoskeleton, like that found in arthropods, must be shed (moulted) when it is outgrown.[8]A new exoskeleton is produced beneath the old one. The new skeleton is soft and pliable as the old one is shed. The animal will typically stay in a den or burrow for this time,[citation needed]as it is quite vulnerable during this period. Once at least partially set, the organism will plump itself up to try to expand the exoskeleton.[ambiguous]The new exoskeleton is still capable of growing to some degree, however.[citation needed]In contrast, moulting reptiles shed only the outer layer of skin and often exhibit indeterminate growth.[9]These animals produce new skin and integuments throughout their life, replacing them according to growth. Arthropod growth, however, is limited by the space within its current exoskeleton. Failure to shed the exoskeleton once outgrown can result in the animal's death or prevent subadults from reaching maturity, thus preventing them from reproducing. This is the mechanism behind some insect pesticides, such asAzadirachtin.[10]

Paleontological significance[edit]

Borings in exoskeletons can provide evidence of animal behaviour. In this case, boringspongesattacked thishard clamshell after the death of the clam, producing the trace fossilEntobia.

Exoskeletons, as hard parts of organisms, are greatly useful in assisting the preservation of organisms, whose soft parts usually rot before they can be fossilized. Mineralized exoskeletons can be preserved as shell fragments. The possession of an exoskeleton permits a couple of other routes tofossilization.For instance, the strong layer can resist compaction, allowing a mould of the organism to be formed underneath the skeleton, which may later decay.[11]Alternatively,exceptional preservationmay result in chitin being mineralised, as in theBurgess Shale,[12]or transformed to the resistant polymerkeratin,which can resist decay and be recovered.

However, our dependence on fossilised skeletons also significantly limits our understanding of evolution. Only the parts of organisms that were alreadymineralisedare usually preserved, such as the shells of molluscs. It helps that exoskeletons often contain "muscle scars", marks where muscles have been attached to the exoskeleton, which may allow the reconstruction of much of an organism's internal parts from its exoskeleton alone.[11]The most significant limitation is that, although there are 30-plusphylaof living animals, two-thirds of these phyla have never been found as fossils, because most animal species are soft-bodied and decay before they can become fossilised.[13]

Mineralized skeletons first appear in the fossil record shortly before the base of theCambrian period,550million years ago.The evolution of a mineralised exoskeleton is considered a possible driving force of theCambrian explosionof animal life, resulting in a diversification of predatory and defensive tactics. However, some Precambrian (Ediacaran)organismsproduced tough outer shells[11]while others, such asCloudina,had a calcified exoskeleton.[14]SomeCloudinashells even show evidence of predation, in the form of borings.[14]

Evolution[edit]

The fossil record primarily contains mineralized exoskeletons, since these are by far the most durable. Since most lineages with exoskeletons are thought to have started with a non-mineralized exoskeleton which they later mineralized, it is difficult to comment on the very early evolution of each lineage's exoskeleton. It is known, however, that in a very short course of time, just before the Cambrian period, exoskeletons made of various materials – silica,calcium phosphate,calcite,aragonite,and even glued-together mineral flakes – sprang up in a range of different environments.[15]Most lineages adopted the form of calcium carbonate which was stable in the ocean at the time they first mineralized, and did not change from this mineral morph - even when it became less favourable.[7]

Some Precambrian (Ediacaran) organisms produced tough but non-mineralized outer shells,[11]while others, such asCloudina,had a calcified exoskeleton,[14]but mineralized skeletons did not become common until the beginning of the Cambrian period, with the rise of the "small shelly fauna".Just after the base of the Cambrian, these miniature fossils become diverse and abundant – this abruptness may be an illusion since the chemical conditions which preserved the small shells appeared at the same time.[16]Most other shell-forming organisms appeared during the Cambrian period, with theBryozoansbeing the only calcifying phylum to appear later, in theOrdovician.The sudden appearance of shells has been linked to a change inocean chemistrywhich made the calcium compounds of which the shells are constructed stable enough to be precipitated into a shell. However, this is unlikely to be a sufficient cause, as the main construction cost of shells is in creating theproteinsandpolysaccharidesrequired for the shell'scomposite structure,not in the precipitation of the mineral components.[4]Skeletonization also appeared at almost the same time that animals startedburrowingto avoid predation, and one of the earliest exoskeletons was made of glued-together mineral flakes, suggesting that skeletonization was likewise a response to increased pressure from predators.[15]

Ocean chemistry may also control which mineral shells are constructed of. Calcium carbonate has two forms, the stable calcite and themetastablearagonite, which is stable within a reasonable range of chemical environments but rapidly becomes unstable outside this range. When the oceans contain a relatively high proportion of magnesium compared to calcium, aragonite is more stable, but as the magnesium concentration drops, it becomes less stable, hence harder to incorporate into an exoskeleton, as it will tend to dissolve.[citation needed]

Except for the molluscs, whose shells often comprise both forms, most lineages use just one form of the mineral. The form used appears to reflect the seawater chemistry – thus which form was more easily precipitated – at the time that the lineage first evolved a calcified skeleton, and does not change thereafter.[7]However, the relative abundance of calcite- and aragonite-using lineages does not reflect subsequent seawater chemistry – the magnesium/calcium ratio of the oceans appears to have a negligible impact on organisms' success, which is instead controlled mainly by how well they recover from mass extinctions.[17]A recently discovered[18]moderngastropodChrysomallon squamiferumthat lives near deep-seahydrothermal ventsillustrates the influence of both ancient and modern local chemical environments: its shell is made of aragonite, which is found in some of the earliest fossil molluscs; but it also has armour plates on the sides of its foot, and these are mineralised with the iron sulfidespyriteandgreigite,which had never previously been found in anymetazoanbut whose ingredients are emitted in large quantities by the vents.[4]

Exoskeleton of a cicada

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940)."ἔξω".A Greek-English Lexicon.Perseus Digital Library.
  2. ^Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert (1940)."σκελετός".A Greek-English Lexicon.Perseus Digital Library.
  3. ^Douglas, Harper (2001)."exoskeleton".Online Etymology Dictionary.Archivedfrom the original on 20 April 2013.
  4. ^abcS. Bengtson (2004)."Early skeletal fossils"(PDF).In J. H. Lipps; B. M. Waggoner (eds.).Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Biological Revolutions.Paleontological Society Papers.Vol. 10. pp. 67–78. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2008-10-03.
  5. ^Nedin, C. (1999). "Anomalocarispredation on nonmineralized and mineralized trilobites ".Geology.27(11): 987–990.Bibcode:1999Geo....27..987N.doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0987:APONAM>2.3.CO;2.
  6. ^H. C. Bennet-Clark (1975)."The energetics of the jump of the locust,Schistocerca gregaria"(PDF).Journal of Experimental Biology.63(1): 53–83.doi:10.1242/jeb.63.1.53.PMID1159370.
  7. ^abcSusannah M. Porter (2007). "Seawater chemistry and early carbonate biomineralization".Science.316(5829): 1302.Bibcode:2007Sci...316.1302P.doi:10.1126/science.1137284.PMID17540895.S2CID27418253.
  8. ^John Ewer (2005-10-11)."How the Ecdysozoan Changed Its Coat".PLOS Biology.3(10): e349.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030349.PMC1250302.PMID16207077.
  9. ^Hariharan, I. K.; Wake, D. B.; Wake, M. H. (2016)."Indeterminate Growth: Could It Represent the Ancestral Condition?".Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology.8(2): a019174.doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a019174.PMC4743077.PMID26216720.
  10. ^Gemma E. Veitch; Edith Beckmann; Brenda J. Burke; Alistair Boyer; Sarah L. Maslen; Steven V. Ley (2007). "Synthesis of Azadirachtin: A Long but Successful Journey".Angewandte Chemie International Edition.46(40): 7629–32.doi:10.1002/anie.200703027.PMID17665403.
  11. ^abcdM. A. Fedonkin; A. Simonetta; A. Y. Ivantsov (2007). "New data onKimberella,the Vendian mollusk-like organism (White sea region, Russia): palaeoecological and evolutionary implications ". In Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia (ed.).The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota.Geological Society of London, Special Publications. Vol. 286. London:Geological Society.pp. 157–179.Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..157F.doi:10.1144/SP286.12.ISBN978-1-86239-233-5.OCLC191881597.S2CID331187.
  12. ^Nicholas J. Butterfield (2003)."Exceptional fossil preservation and the Cambrian Explosion".Integrative and Comparative Biology.43(1): 166–177.doi:10.1093/icb/43.1.166.PMID21680421.
  13. ^Richard Cowen (2004).History of Life(4th ed.).Wiley-Blackwell.ISBN978-1-4051-1756-2.
  14. ^abcHong Hua; Brian R. Pratt; Lu-yi Zhang (2003). "Borings inCloudinashells: complex predator-prey dynamics in the terminal Neoproterozoic ".PALAIOS.18(4–5): 454–459.Bibcode:2003Palai..18..454H.doi:10.1669/0883-1351(2003)018<0454:BICSCP>2.0.CO;2.S2CID131590949.
  15. ^abJ. Dzik (2007)."The Verdun Syndrome: simultaneous origin of protective armor and infaunal shelters at the Precambrian–Cambrian transition"(PDF).In Patricia Vickers-Rich & Patricia (ed.).The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota.Vol. 286. London:Geological Society.pp. 405–414.Bibcode:2007GSLSP.286..405D.CiteSeerX10.1.1.693.9187.doi:10.1144/SP286.30.ISBN978-1-86239-233-5.OCLC191881597.S2CID33112819.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2008-10-03.{{cite book}}:|journal=ignored (help)
  16. ^J. Dzik (1994)."Evolution of 'small shelly fossils' assemblages of the early Paleozoic".Acta Palaeontologica Polonica.39(3): 27–313.Archivedfrom the original on 2008-12-05.
  17. ^Wolfgang Kiessling; Martin Aberhan; Loïc Villier (2008). "Phanerozoic trends in skeletal mineralogy driven by mass extinctions".Nature Geoscience.1(8): 527–530.Bibcode:2008NatGe...1..527K.doi:10.1038/ngeo251.
  18. ^Anders Warén; Stefan Bengtson; Shana K. Goffredi; Cindy L. Van Dover (2003). "A hot-vent gastropod with iron sulfide dermal sclerites".Science.302(5647): 1007.doi:10.1126/science.1087696.PMID14605361.S2CID38386600.