Finlandization

Not to be confused withFinnicization.

Urho KekkonenandLeonid Brezhnevin 1960 during Kekkonen's state visit to the Soviet Union.

Finlandization(Finnish:suomettuminen;Swedish:finlandisering;German:Finnlandisierung;Estonian:soometumine;Russian:финляндизация, finlyandizatsiya) is the process by which one powerful country makes a smaller neighboring country refrain from opposing the former's foreign policy rules, while allowing it to keep its nominal independence and its own political system.The term means "to become likeFinland",referring to the influence of theSoviet Unionon Finland's policies during theCold War.

The term is often consideredpejorative.It originated in theWest Germanpolitical debate of the late 1960s and 1970s. As the term was used in West Germany and otherNATOcountries, it referred to the decision of acountrynot to challenge a more powerful neighbour in foreign politics, while maintaining nationalsovereignty.It is commonly used in reference to Finland's policies in relation to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, but it can refer more generally to similar international relations, such asDenmark's attitude toward Germany between 1871 and 1940, or the policies of theSwissgovernment towardsNazi Germanyuntil the end ofWorld War II.

Origin and international usage

Finland's PresidentUrho Kekkonen,translator Kustaa Loikkanen and General SecretaryNikita Khrushchevtalking, at Kekkonen's 60th birthday

In Germany, the term was used mainly by proponents of closer adaptation toUSpolicies, chieflyFranz Josef Strauss,but was initially coined in scholarly debate, and made known by the German political scientistsRichard Löwenthal,Walter HallsteinandKurt Birrenbach,reflecting feared effects of withdrawal of US troops from Germany.It came to be used in the debate of the NATO countries in response toWilly Brandt's attempts tonormalise relations with East Germany,and the following widespread scepticism in Germany against NATO'sDual-Track Decision.Later, after thefall of the Soviet Union,the term has been used in Finland for the post-1968 radicalisation in the latter half of theUrho Kekkonenera.

In the 1990s, Finlandization was also discussed as a potential strategy that the Soviet Union underGorbachevmay have attempted to revise its relationship with theWarsaw Pactstates from 1989 to 1991, as a way to transition frominformal empireto a loosersphere of influencemodel, which was precluded by the fall of the USSR.

United States foreign policy experts consistently feared thatWestern Europewould be Finlandized by the Soviet Union, leading to a situation in which these key allies would no longer support the United States against the Soviet Union. The theory ofbandwagoningprovided support for the idea that if the United States was not able to provide strong and credible support for theanti-communistpositions of its allies,NATOand the U.S.–Japan alliance could collapse.

As early as 2010Shinzo Abefeared the Finlandization ofJapanandSouth KoreatoChina,because of its growing influence and power.

The term has also been used in discussing other countries, for example as a potential outcome of theRusso-Ukrainian War.

Finnish perception

In April 1970, a Finnish stamp was issued in honour of the 100th anniversary of the birth of Vladimir Lenin and the Lenin Symposium held that year in Tampere.

Finns have, and had, a wide variety of reactions to the term "Finlandization".Some have perceived the term as blunt criticism,stemming from an inability to understand the practicalities of how a small nation needs to deal with an adjacentsuperpowerwithout losing itssovereignty.These practicalities existed primarily because of the lingering effect of Russian rule in the time before theFinnsfirst gained sovereignty; and because of the precarious power balance eastwards, springing from a geographically extended yet sparsely populated state with a traditionally imperialist superpower right across the border.

The reason Finland engaged in Finlandization was primarilyRealpolitik:to survive. On the other hand, the threat of the Soviet Union was used also in Finland's domestic politics in a way that possibly deepened Finlandization (playing the so-calledidänkortti,'east card'). Finland made such a deal withJoseph Stalin's government in the late 1940s, and it was largely respected by both parties—and to the gain of both parties—until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991. While the Finnish political and intellectual elite mostly understood the term to refer more to the foreign policy problems of other countries, and meant mostly for domestic consumption in the speaker's own country, many ordinary Finns considered the term highly offensive.The Finnish political cartoonistKari Suomalainenonce explained Finlandization as "the art of bowing to the East withoutmooningthe West ".

Historical background

Finland's foreign politics before this deal had been varied: independence fromImperial Russiawith support ofImperial Germanyin 1917; participation in theRussian Civil War(without official declaration of war) alongside theTriple Entente1918–1920; a non-ratified alliance withPolandin 1922; association with the neutralist anddemocraticScandinaviancountries in the 1930s ended by the 1939Winter Waragainst the Soviet Union, in which the Finns thwarted the Soviet attempt to conquer Finland, albeit with the cession of 9% of Finnish territory; and finally in 1940, a rapprochement withNazi Germany,the only power able and willing to help Finland against the expansionist Soviet Union, which led to Finland'sre-entry into the Second World Warin 1941.

Paasikivi doctrine

See also:Paasikivi–Kekkonen doctrine

Urho KekkonenandJuho Kusti Paasikivi

Ahti Karjalainenwas one of the influential figures inFinnish politicsduring theCold Warand especially for its good relations with the East

After theParis Peace Treatyof 1947, Finland succeeded in retaining democracy andparliamentarism,despite the heavy political pressure on Finland's foreign and internal affairs by the Soviet Union.Finland's foreign relationswere guided by the doctrine formulated byJuho Kusti Paasikivi,emphasising the necessity to maintain a good and trusting relationship with the Soviet Union.

Finland signed anAgreement of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistancewith the Soviet Union in April 1948, under which Finland was obliged to resist armed attacks by "Germany or its allies" against Finland, or against the Soviet Union through Finland, and, if necessary, ask for Soviet military aid to do so. At the same time, the agreement recognised Finland's desire to remain outsidegreat powerconflicts, allowing the country to adopt a policy ofneutralityduring theCold War.

As a consequence, Finland did not participate in theMarshall Planand took neutral positions on Soviet overseas initiatives. By keeping very cool relations to NATO and western military powers in general, Finland could fend off Soviet pressure for affiliation to the Warsaw Pact.

Self-censorship and excessive Soviet adaptation

From the political scene following the post-1968 radicalisation, the Soviet adaptation spread to the editors ofmass media,sparking strong forms of self-control,self-censorshipand pro-Soviet attitudes. Most of the elite of media and politics shifted their attitudes to match the values that the Soviets were thought to favor and approve.

Only after the ascent of Mikhail Gorbachev to Soviet leadership in 1985 did mass media in Finland gradually begin to criticise the Soviet Union more. When the Soviet Union allowed non-communist governments to take power in Eastern Europe, Gorbachev suggested they could look to Finland as an example to follow.

Censorship

Finnish Board of Film Classification

Between 1944 and 1946, the Soviet part of the allied control commission demanded that Finnish public libraries should remove from circulation more than 1,700 books that were deemed anti-Soviet, and bookstores were given catalogs of banned books.TheFinnish Board of Film Classificationlikewise banned movies that it considered to be anti-Soviet.Banned movies includedOne, Two, Three(1961), directed byBilly Wilder,The Manchurian Candidate(1962), directed byJohn Frankenheimer,One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich(1970), by Finnish directorCaspar Wrede,andBorn American(1986), by Finnish directorRenny Harlin.

The censorship never took the form of purging. Possession or use of anti-Soviet books was not banned, but the reprinting and distribution of such materials was prohibited. Especially in the realm of radio and television self-censorship, it was sometimes hard to tell whether the motivations were even political. For example, once a system of blacklisting recordings had been introduced, individual policy makers within the national broadcaster,Yleisradio,also utilized it to censor songs they deemed inappropriate for other reasons, such as some of those featuring sexual innuendo or references to alcohol.

End of Finlandization

See also:Finland–NATO relations

Foreign ministerPekka Haavistosigning Finland's application forNATOmembership in 2022

President of FinlandSauli Niinistöaccepts and signs the articles of the NATO laws in 2023

After thedissolution of the Soviet Unionin 1991 and the end of the Cold War, the Finno-Soviet Treaty of 1948 was replaced by a new bilateral treaty between Finland and theRussian Federationon a more equal footing, ending the Paasikivi-Kekkonen doctrine. Finland joined theEuropean Unionin1995,adopting itsCommon Foreign and Security Policy.Since joining thePartnership for Peaceprogram of NATO in 1994, there has been increasing cooperation with NATO, including interoperability and participation in NATO missions.

Despite these changes, Finland initially remained militarily non-aligned and attempted to retain good relations with Russia. However, the 2022Russian invasion of Ukrainecaused a dramatic increase of public and political support in Finland for full membership in NATO. Theapplication for membershipwas formally submitted on 18 May,and after all 30 NATO members ratified the application, Finland became the 31st member of NATO on 4 April 2023.The notion of "end of Finlandization" has been applied both to the changing circumstances resulting from the end of the Cold War and to Finland's decision to join NATO.

See also

• Appeasement
• Austrian neutrality
• Balkanization
• Finland–NATO relations
• Finland–Russia relations
• Finnish Security Intelligence Service
• History of Finland § History 1945 to present
• Moldovan neutrality
• Note Crisis
• Sadae
• Satellite state
• Soviet Empire
• Swedish neutrality
• Swiss neutrality
• Neutral and Non-Aligned European States
• Neutral member states in the European Union

External links

• "Finland's Relations with the Soviet Union, 1940–1986"by Peter Botticelli
• "'Finlandization "in action: Helsinki's experience with Moscow"Archived2016-03-04 at theWayback Machinepresented at the Web site of the CIA
• "Three Cheers for Balkanization!"Archived2021-02-27 at theWayback Machineby Bruce Walker, re-evaluating the Finlandization concept
• The Silenced Media: The Propaganda War Between Russia and the West in Northern Europe—review byJussi Hanhimäkiof a book by Esko Salminen
• "The Silent Estate?"Archived2019-10-03 at theWayback Machine—review by David McDuff of the same book by Esko Salminen
• A tale of polar diplomacy and suppressed sorrow: The end of an era for Finland and the world