Finno-Samic languages
| Finno-Samic | |
|---|---|
| (controversial) | |
| Geographic distribution | NorthernFennoscandia,Baltic states |
| Linguistic classification | Uralic
|
| Subdivisions | |
| Glottolog | None |
 Approximate distribution of Finno-Samic languages, across Northern Europe. | |
TheFinno-Samic languages[a]are a hypothetical subgroup of theUralic family,and are made up of 22 languages classified into either theSami languages,which are spoken by theSami peoplewho inhabit theSápmiregion of northernFennoscandia,orFinnic languages,which include the major languagesFinnishandEstonian.[1]The grouping is not universally recognized as valid.[2]
Related hypotheses[edit]
TheMordvinic languagesappear to also align closely with both Finnic and Samic. Some innovations in the consonant system are shared by Finnic and Mordvinic specifically,[3]while a number of innovations in the vowel system are shared by Samic and Mordvinic specifically.[4]
TheMari languageshows a smaller number of similarities with all three of these, and a larger grouping encompassing Finnic, Samic, Mordvinic and Mari is sometimes posited (theFinno-Volgaic languages).
Helimski (2006) proposes a "Northwest" group of Finno-Ugric languages, encompassing not only Finnic and Sami, but also extinct languages once spoken in the north of European Russia, traceable only as substrata, especially in toponymy.[5]
Arguments for and against genetical unity[edit]
Thecommon ancestorof Finnic and Samic is traditionally known as Early Proto-Finnic (Finnish:varhaiskantasuomi).[6]Itsphonologyandmorphologycan be reconstructed in great detail. However, this reconstruction turns out to be nearly identical to assumed preceding stages such as Proto-Finno-Volgaic, Proto-Finno-Ugric,and evenProto-Uralicitself.[3]
There are a number of noticeable traits common to most Finno-Samic languages, however none of them unquestionably in favor of a family unity. The first of these is the presence ofconsonant gradation,found in all of the languages except the marginal languages of the group,Livonian,VepsandSouthern Sami.Gradation is also found in the distantly related SamoyedicNganasan,and it has been debated if gradation is an original Uralic feature suppressed in all other branches, an independent innovation in Finno-Lappic and Nganasan, or independent in all three of Finnic, Samic and Nganasan. Also, even if gradation in Finnic and Samic is connected, it is disputed whether this represents common inheritance or later contact influence.[3]
The contrastive presence ofrounded vowelsbeyond the first syllable, atypical of Uralic languages in general, is also found in both Finnic and Samic (and again also Samoyedic). This too has been argued to represent later contact influence, on the basis of comparisons such as F.*enoj:S.*eanoj"maternal uncle", where the exclusively Finnic development*aj>*ojappears to have been loaned into Samic. There is also considerable disagreement between the languages (both between the two families, and within them) in whether certain words contain a rounded vowel.[3]
The loss of initial*wbefore a short rounded vowel has also been proposed as a common innovation, but with counterexamples such as Estonianvõtta-"to take" (with*wpreserved as its regular reflex/ʋ/due to the development*o>/ɤ/) suggesting a date postdating not only the split between Finnic and Samic, but also of northern and southern Finnic (cf. Finnishotta-).[3](A complementary epenthesis of *w before initiallongrounded vowels is accepted to not represent common inheritance, as it occurs also before long vowels resulting from the exclusively Samic development*a>*ō.[citation needed])
Formorphologicalfeatures common to Samic and Finnic formerly thought to represent Finno-Samic innovations, explanations have likewise been offered either of common Uralic inheritance or of independent innovation.[3]
Lexicon[edit]
Approximately 600 native word roots are shared by the Finnic and Samic languages,[6]of which approximately 100 lack cognates in the other Uralic languages. The high number of Finnicloanwordsin Samic makes exact analysis however difficult, and old loanwords from Samic to Finnic may also be involved, especially in light of approximately a third of these words being absent also from the more southern Finnic languages (Estonian,LivonianandVotic). These numbers can be contrasted with ca. 40 word roots exclusive to Finnic and Mordvinic, 12 word roots exclusive to Samic and Mordvinic, and 22 word roots exclusive to all three.[3]
Additionally a large number of early loanwords from theGermanic languages,and a small number from theBaltic languages,are found in both Finnic and Samic.[3]Such words cannot however provide clear evidence for a Finno-Samic grouping, as the possibility remains that these have been acquired separately by early Finnic and early Samic, after their initial separation but prior to the development of their most distinctive features.[7]
Notes[edit]
- ^Variants of the name includeFinno-Saamic,Finno-Lappic,Fenno-Saamic,orSaamic–Fennic.
References[edit]
- ^Grenoble, Lenore (2003).Language Policy in the Soviet Union.New York:Springer.p. 15.ISBN1-4020-1298-5.
- ^Salminen, Tapani 2002: Problems in the taxonomy of the Uralic languages in the light of modern comparative studies.http:// helsinki.fi/~tasalmin/kuzn.html
- ^abcdefghItkonen, Terho (1997)."Reflections on pre-Uralic and the" Saami-Finnic protolanguage ""(pdf).Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen.54.ISSN0355-1253.Retrieved2009-12-16.[permanent dead link]
- ^Zhivlov, Mikhail (2014). "Studies in Uralic vocalism III".Journal of Language Relationship.
- ^Helimski, Eugene(2006). "The «Northwestern» group of Finno-Ugric languages and its heritage in the place names and substratum vocabulary of the Russian North". In Nuorluoto, Juhani (ed.).The Slavicization of the Russian North (Slavica Helsingiensia 27)(PDF).Helsinki: Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures. pp. 109–127.ISBN978-952-10-2852-6.
- ^abKulonen, Ulla-Maija;Seurujärvi-Kari,Irja; Pulkkinen, Risto, eds. (2005).The Saami: A Cultural Encyclopedia.Helsinki:Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.ISBN951-746-506-8.
- ^Häkkinen, Jaakko (2012). "After the protolanguage: Invisible convergence, false divergence and boundary shift".Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen.61:7–28.ISSN0355-1253.
