Jump to content

Gemini 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gemini 1
Launch of Gemini 1
Mission typeTest flight
OperatorNASA
COSPAR ID1964-018AEdit this at Wikidata
SATCATno.782
Mission duration4 hours 50 minutes
Distance travelled1,733,541 miles (2,789,864 km)
Orbits completed63
Spacecraft properties
SpacecraftGeminiSC1
ManufacturerMcDonnell
Launch mass7,026 pounds (3,187 kg)
(11,400 pounds (5,170 kg) with 2nd stage)
Start of mission
Launch dateApril 8, 1964, 16:01:01.69(1964-04-08UTC16:01:01Z)UTC
RocketTitan II GLV,s/n 62-12556
Launch siteCape KennedyLC-19
End of mission
DisposalUncontrolled reentry
Decay dateApril 12, 1964, 15:00:00(1964-04-12UTC16Z)UTC
Landing siteMiddle of SouthAtlantic Ocean
Orbital parameters
Reference systemGeocentric
RegimeLow Earth orbit
Perigee altitude84 nautical miles (155 km)
Apogee altitude146 nautical miles (271 km)
Inclination32.5 degrees
Period88.76 minutes
EpochApril 10, 1964[1]

Gemini 1was the first mission inNASA'sGemini program.[2]An uncrewed test flight of the Gemini spacecraft, its main objectives were to test the structural integrity of the new spacecraft andmodified Titan II launch vehicle.It was also the first test of the new tracking and communication systems for the Gemini program and provided training for the ground support crews for the first crewed missions.[3]

Originally scheduled for launch in December 1963, difficulties in the development of both the spacecraft and its booster caused four months of delay. Gemini 1 was launched fromLaunch Complex 19atCape Kennedy(now Canaveral), Florida on April 8, 1964. The spacecraft stayed attached to the second stage of the rocket. The mission lasted for threeorbitswhile test data were taken, but the spacecraft stayed in space for almost 64 orbits until its orbit decayed due to atmospheric drag. The spacecraft was not intended to be recovered, and holes were drilled through its heat shield to ensure it would not survive re-entry.

Background[edit]

Project Geminiwas conceived as a bridge between America's single-seatProject Mercuryand the three-seatProject Apollo.With a design largely extrapolated from its predecessor,[4]: 71 the Gemini spacecraft would allow two astronauts to conduct the maneuvers inherent in Apollo's lunar mission: rendezvous, docking, and changing of orbit. Moreover, Gemini would support astronauts in space for extended flights, approximating the expected length of the Apollo missions.[4]: 55–74 

Its two-person capacity and greater capabilities meant that Gemini would be a substantially heavier spacecraft than Mercury had been — too heavy to be lofted into orbit by Mercury'sAtlasrocket. A replacement was needed. The newly developed Titan II ICBM (which had also been tapped by theAir Forcefor itsX-20 spaceplane project) was an attractive replacement. It had a thrust some two and a half times that of the Atlas, a far simpler mechanical construction, and the ability to store propellants indefinitely. Moreover, the Titan II's propellants mixed less violently than those of Atlas meaning a booster explosion, should it happen, would be less violent. This made obsolete the heavy escape tower used in the Mercury program; instead, ejection seats could be used.[4]: 41–42 

The primary goal of the first Gemini mission was to flight test themodified Titan II launch vehicleand the basic structural soundness of the Gemini capsule under launch and orbital conditions. Consequently, the first Gemini capsule could be a largely boilerplate structure.[4]: 181 Secondary goals of the mission included testing the remote guidance systems, the Titan's redundancy systems, and evaluation of the Gemini-Titan malfunction detection system.[5]

Pre-flight[edit]

Gemini Spacecraft Number 1 was built specifically for the uncrewed mission. Most internal systems were replaced with dummies and ballast approximating the weight and balance of the crewed spacecraft. In place of the crew couches, two pallets of instruments were installed for the relaying viatelemetryof thepressure,vibration,acceleration,temperature,and structural loads experienced during the short flight. A spacecraftheat shieldwas installed, but four large holes were drilled in it to ensure Gemini 1 was destroyed during reentry.[4]: 181 

Even with the simplified systems, this first Gemini encountered several weeks of delay in testing. Nevertheless, it was not the spacecraft that caused the launch date, originally planned for December 1963, to slip. Rather, it was the testing and man-rating of theTitan IIlaunch vehicle. Assembled on May 21, 1963, the first Titan-Gemini launch vehicle required comprehensive testing and retesting, and it was not until October that it was ready for transport to the launch site — where considerable preparation still had to be done.[4]: 185 Moreover, there was concern that the Titan II produced too much vertical oscillation (pogo) to be usable at all, and consideration was given to using theSaturn Irocket instead, at least for the first missions. However, on November 1, 1963, the Air Force flew a Titan II rocket withstandpipesin its oxidizer lines and mechanical accumulators in its fuel lines, which suppressed the pogo effect.[6]

Inefficient project management threatened to further delay the first Gemini launch, which by November had already been pushed back to February 28, 1964. Gemini Manager Charles Mathews united the several disparate teams into a single Gemini Launch Vehicle Coordination Committee with clearly defined management and communication channels.[4]: 188 This measure ensured that no more time would be lost due to uncertain authority, duplicated effort, or conflicting decisions. Still, issues that arose during testing caused the launch date to slip further.[4]: 189 The Titan II booster was not ready for final readiness testing until March 3, 1964, the same day that Gemini Spacecraft Number 1 arrived at the launch complex for mating with its booster.[4]: 190 Faulty test equipment caused a further delay of two weeks. By late March, all serious hurdles cleared, Gemini 1's launch date was set for April 7.[4]: 195 The resolution of a failure in the secondary autopilot caused one last day of delay. Finally, by noon of the seventh, Gemini 1's Mission Review Board determined unanimously that all systems were cleared for flight.[4]: 197 

Mission and results[edit]

After a flawless countdown, Gemini 1's Titan II booster lifted off from Cape Kennedy's (now Canaveral) Launch Complex 19[4]: 194 at 11:00:01 EDT, April 8, 1964.[4]: 197 The first stage was jettisoned after two and a half minutes with the rocket 35 nautical miles (64 km) high and 49 nautical miles (91 km) downrange. At that moment, there was an unexpected three-second loss of signal from the craft. It was later determined that this brief communications blackout was caused by charged ions from the separation and startup of the second stage, similar to the blackout during spacecraft reentry. All subsequent Gemini flights would have the same brief blackout.[7]

The spacecraft achieved orbit five and a half minutes after launch. The launch vehicle had imparted an excess 7 meters (24 feet) per second of velocity to the Gemini 1, placing the spacecraft into an orbit with an apogee of 170 nautical miles (320 km) instead of the planned 161 nautical miles (299 km). This lengthened Gemini 1's lifespan from the planned three and a half days to four.[4]: 199 

The formal mission of Gemini 1 was over long before that. Its battery had only been designed to last a single orbit,[8]and only the first three orbits — lasting four hours and 50 minutes — were part of the flight plan. Gemini 1 and its attached second stage were tracked by theManned Space Flight Networkuntil they reentered over theSouth Atlantic,midway betweenSouth AmericaandAfrica,on April 12, 1964, during their 64th orbit.[4]: 199 

As a result of the successful flight, the Titan II was considered "man-rated" (safe for use in human spaceflight).[4]: 200 Man-rating the Gemini capsule itself would not be accomplished until the launch ofGemini 2nine months later, on January 19, 1965.[4]: 209 

The Gemini 1 mission was supported by 5,176United States Department of Defensepersonnel, as well as eleven aircraft and three ships provided by the Department of Defense.[4]: Appendix G-299 

References[edit]

Public DomainThis article incorporatespublic domain materialfrom websites or documents of theNational Aeronautics and Space Administration.

  1. ^McDowell, Jonathan."SATCAT".Jonathan's Space Pages.RetrievedMarch 23,2014.
  2. ^"Gemini 1".NASA Space Science Data Coordinated Archive.RetrievedJune 28,2018.
  3. ^"Gemini 1".Gunter's Space Page. December 11, 2017.RetrievedOctober 15,2012.
  4. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrHacker, Barton C.; Grimwood, James M. (February 2003) [First published 1977]."Table of Contents".On the Shoulders of Titans: A History of Project Gemini.NASA History Series. Washington, D.C.:NASA.ISBN9781493775910.NASA SP-4203. Archived fromthe originalon January 13, 2010.RetrievedMarch 11,2019.
  5. ^"First Successful Gemini Mission Points to Manned Flight in 1964".Aviation Week and Space Technology.New York: McGraw Hill Publishing Company. April 13, 1964.RetrievedMarch 14,2019.
  6. ^"Why Did NASA Choose an Untested Missile to Launch Gemini?".Popular Science.January 17, 2016.RetrievedMarch 15,2019.
  7. ^Chris Kraft,Flight,p. 203.
  8. ^"Gemini Flight Readied".Aviation Week and Space Technology.New York: McGraw Hill Publishing Company. April 6, 1964.RetrievedApril 8,2019.

External links[edit]