Genocide recognition politics

Genocide recognition politicsare efforts to have a certain event (re)interpreted as a "genocide"or officially designated as such.Such efforts may occur regardless of whether the event meets the definition of genocide laid out in the 1948Genocide Convention.

In countries with settler colonial past, recognition of colonial genocides is difficult as the national past could be called into question.Most genocides have been perpetrated by states.

By country

Canada

See also:Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement,Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada,andCanadian Indian residential schools gravesite discoveries § Government

As of June 2021, the government ofCanadaofficially recognises eight genocides that took place beyond its borders: theArmenian genocide(1915–1917), theHolodomor(1932–1933),the Holocaust(1941-1945), theRwandan genocide(1994), theSrebrenica massacre(1995), theGenocide of Yazidis by ISIL(2014), theUyghur genocide(2014–present; recognised by Canada in February 2021), and theRohingya genocide(2016–present). Some activists and scholars such asPhil FontaineandDavid Bruce MacDonaldhave argued that the Canadian government should also officially recognise various atrocities committed against theIndigenous peoples in Canadafrom the late 19th century until the mid-20th century as 'genocide', especially after the2021 Canadian Indian residential schools gravesite discoveries.In October 2022, the House of Commons unanimously passed a motion to have the Canadian government officially recognize the residential school system as genocide against Indigenous populations.

Germany

See also:Wiedergutmachung,Claims Conference,Reparations Agreement between Israel and the Federal Republic of Germany,andHerero and Namaqua genocide § Recognition

Canadian political scientistDavid Bruce MacDonaldstated in June 2021 that it is rare for governments to recognise genocides committed by previous administrations of the same country, citingGermanyas an example: it has officially recognisedthe Holocaust(committed byNazi Germanyduring the Second World War), and in May 2021 Germany officially recognised theHerero and Namaqua genocide(committed by theGerman Empirein 1904–1908).

Israel

On 21 November 2018, a bill tabled by opposition MPKsenia Svetlova(ZU) to recognise the Islamic State's killing of Yazidis as a genocide was defeated in a 58 to 38 vote in theKnesset.Thecoalition partiesmotivated their rejection of the bill by saying that the United Nations had not yet recognised it as a genocide.

Netherlands

In their 2017–2021 coalition agreement published on 10 October 2017, the four parties forming theThird Rutte cabinetstated the following policy: "For the Dutch government, rulings from international courts of justice or criminal courts, unambiguous conclusions from scientific research, and findings by the UN, are leading in the recognition of genocides. The Netherlands act in accordance with the obligations arising from the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. At the UN Security Council, the Netherlands are pro-active in combatingISISand the prosecution of ISIS fighters. "On 22 February 2018, theDutch House of Representativesformallyrecognised the Armenian genocidewith 147 votes out of 150; only the three MPs of theDutch Turks-dominated partyDENKopposed recognition as a "too one-sided explanation of history".Although the Dutch government stated it would not (yet) take a stand on whether it was a genocide, instead using the phrase "the Armenian genocide question", it agreed with MPJoël Voordewind's suggestion to send a government representative to attendArmenian Genocide Remembrance DayinYerevanevery 5 years "to show respect to all victims and survivors of all massacres against minorities", said Foreign MinisterSigrid Kaag.On 9 February 2021, a large majority of the House supported a motion calling on the government to fully recognise the Armenian genocide and dropping the phrase "the Armenian genocide question"; the only parties who did not support the call were theVVD,and again DENK.Inge Drost,spokesperson for the Federation Armenian Organisations Netherlands, stated in April 2021: "Every time recognition was brought up, it turned out to be a political bargaining tool. Then a country wanted get something out of Turkey, and threatened to recognise the Armenian genocide. Then eventually, it did not happen. It's a very sensitive issue for us."

United Kingdom

The legal department of the BritishForeign, Commonwealth and Development Officehas a long-standing policy, dating back to the 1948 passing of the Genocide Convention, of refusing to give a legal description to potential war crimes. For this reason, it has sought to dissuade any UK governmental institution from making claims about genocide. On 20 April 2016, theHouse of Commons of the United Kingdomunanimously supported a motion to declare that thetreatment of Yazidis and Christians by the Islamic State amounted to genocide,to condemn it as such, and to refer the issue to the UN Security Council. It was almost unprecedented for British parliamentarians to collectively to declare war-time actions as genocide, because in doing so,ConservativeMPs defied their fellow party members in the UK government. Foreign Office secretaryTobias Ellwood– who was jeered at and interrupted by MPs during his speech in the debate – stated that he personally believed genocide had taken place, but that it was not up to politicians to make that determination, but to the courts.

United States

See also:United States recognition of the Armenian genocideandCalifornia genocide § Apology by California's governor

Between 1989 and 2022, theUnited States Department of Statehas formally recognized eight genocides: in Bosnia (1993), Rwanda (1994), Iraq (1995), Darfur (2004), and areas under the control of ISIS (2016 and 2017). During the last days of the Trump administration the Uyghur genocide was recognized, a decision affirmed by the Biden administration, which also recognized the Armenian genocide in April 2021 and the Rohingya genocide in Burma/Myanmar, with the determination coming in March 2022.Three other cases were considered, namely Burundi in the mid-1990s, Sudan's "Two Areas" in 2013, and Burma in 2018, but ultimately the process of recognition was not completed.A March 2019USHMMreport by Buchwald & Keith stated: "No formal policy exists or has existed to guide how or when the US government decides whether genocide has occurred and whether to state its conclusion publicly."However, there are two memoranda – the first written by Secretary of StateWarren Christopherin May 1994 regarding Rwanda, and the second by Secretary of StateColin Powellin June 2004 regarding Darfur – that provide some insight into the decision-making process, and advise or authoritise U.S. government officials on what to do in genocide recognition questions.

By event

2002 Gujarat riots

Main articles:2002 Gujarat riots,Hindu terrorism,andHindutva

Pacification of Algeria

This section is an excerpt fromPacification of Algeria § Characterisation as genocide.[edit]

Some governments and scholars have calledFrance'sconquestofAlgeriaagenocide,such asRaphael Lemkin,who coined the word "genocide"in the 20th century andBen Kiernan,an Australian expert on theCambodian genocide,who wrote inBlood and Soil: A World History of Genocide and Extermination from Sparta to Darfuron the French conquest ofAlgeria:

By 1875, the French conquest was complete. The war had killed approximately 825,000 indigenous Algerians since 1830. A long shadow of genocidal hatred persisted, provoking a French author to protest in 1882 that in Algeria, "we hear it repeated every day that we must expel the native and if necessary destroy him." As a French statistical journal urged five years late, "the system of extermination must give way to a policy of penetration."

— Ben Kiernan, Blood and Soil

Anfal campaign

TheKurdistan Regional Governmenthas set aside 14 April as a day of remembrance for the Al-Anfal campaign.InSulaymanyaa museum was established in theformer prisonof theDirectorate of General Security.ManyIraqi Arabsreject that any mass killings of Kurds occurred during the Anfal campaign.

On 28 February 2013, theBritish House of Commonsformally recognized the Anfal as genocide following a campaign led by Conservative MPNadhim Zahawi,who is ofKurdish descent.

Armenian genocide

This section is an excerpt fromArmenian genocide recognition.[edit]

The eternal flame at the center of the twelve slabs, located at theArmenian Genocide Memorial complexinYerevan,Armenia

Armenian genocide recognitionis the formal acceptance of the fact that theOttoman Empire'ssystematic massacres and forced deportationofArmeniansfrom 1915 to 1923, both during and after theFirst World War,constitutedgenocide.

Most historians outsideTurkeyrecognize the fact that the Ottoman Empire's persecution of Armenians was a genocide.However, despite the recognition of the genocidal character of the massacre of Armenians in scholarship as well as in civil society, some governments have been reticent to officially acknowledge the killings as genocide because of political concerns about their relations with the government of Turkey.

As of 2023,the governments and parliaments of 34 countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Sweden and the United States, have formally recognized the Armenian genocide.

Three countries — Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Pakistan — deny the fact that there was an Armenian genocide.

Anti-Sikh riots

The1984 anti-Sikh riots,also known as the1984 Sikh Massacre,was a series of organisedpogromsagainstSikhsinIndiafollowing theassassination of Indira Gandhiby her Sikh bodyguards.The rulingIndian National Congresshad been in active complicity with the mob, as to the organisation of the riots.Government estimates project that about 2,800 Sikhs were killed inDelhiand 3,350 nationwide,whilst independent sources estimate the number of deaths at about 8,000–17,000.

This section is an excerpt from1984 anti-Sikh riots § Impact and legacy.[edit]

On 12 August 2005, then Prime Minister of India Dr.Manmohan Singhapologised in theLok Sabhafor the riots.The riots are cited as a reason to support the creation of a Sikh homeland in India, often calledKhalistan.

On 15 January 2017, theWall of Truthwas inaugurated inLutyens' Delhi,New Delhi, as a memorial for Sikhs killed during the 1984 riots (and other hate crimes across the world).

Assyrian genocide (Sayfo)

This section is an excerpt fromSayfo § International recognition.[edit]

The Sayfo is less well known than theArmenian genocide,partially because its targets were divided among mutually-antagonistic churches and did not develop a collective identity.During the 1990s, before the first academic research on the Sayfo, Assyrian diaspora groups (inspired by campaigns forArmenian genocide recognition) began to press for a similar formal acknowledgement.In parallel with the political campaign, Armenian genocide research began to include Assyrians as victims.In December 2007, theInternational Association of Genocide Scholarspassed a resolution recognizing the Assyrian genocide.The Sayfo is also recognized as a genocide in resolutions passed by Sweden (in 2010),Armenia (2015),the Netherlands (2015),and Germany (in 2016).Memorials in Armenia, Australia, Belgium, France, Greece, Sweden, Ukraine, and the United States commemorate victims of the Sayfo.

Atrocities in the Congo Free State

See also:Belgian apologies to the Congo

This section is an excerpt fromAtrocities in the Congo Free State § Historiography and the term "genocide".["genocide" edit]

...It was indeed a holocaust before Hitler's Holocaust.... What happened in the heart of Africa was genocidal in scope long before that now familiar term, genocide, was ever coined.

HistorianRobert Weisbord(2003)

The significant number of deaths under the Free State regime has led some scholars to relate the atrocities to latergenocides,though understanding of the losses under the colonial administration's rule as the result of harsh economic exploitation rather than a policy of deliberate extermination has led others to dispute the comparison;there is an open debate as to whether the atrocities constitute genocide.According to theUnited Nations'1948 definition of the term "genocide",a genocide must be "acts committed withintent to destroy,in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group ".According to Georgi Verbeeck, this conventional definition of genocide has prevented most historians from using the term to describe atrocities in the Free State; in the strict sense of the term, most historians have rejected allegations of genocide.

SociologistRhoda Howard-Hassmannstated that because the Congolese were not killed in a systematic fashion according to this criterion, "technically speaking, this was not genocide even in a legally retroactive sense."Hochschild and political scientistGeorges Nzongola-Ntalajarejected allegations of genocide in the Free State because there was no evidence of a policy of deliberate extermination or the desire to eliminate any specific population groups,though the latter added that nevertheless there was "a death toll ofHolocaustproportions, "which led him to call it "the Congo holocaust."

...no reputable historian of the Congo has made charges of genocide; a forced labor system, although it may be equally deadly, is different.

HistorianAdam Hochschild(2005)

It is generally agreed by historians that extermination was never the policy of the Free State. According to Van Reybrouck, "It would be absurd... to speak of an act of 'genocide' or a 'holocaust'; genocide implies the conscious, planned annihilation of a specific population, and that was never the intention here, or the result... But it was definitely ahecatomb,a slaughter on a staggering scale that was not intentional, but could have been recognised much earlier as the collateral damage of a perfidious, rapacious policy of exploitation ".HistorianBarbara Emersonstated, "Leopold did not start genocide. He was greedy for money and chose not to interest himself when things got out of control."According to Hochschild, "while not a case of genocide, in the strict sense", the atrocities in the Congo were "one of the most appalling slaughters known to have been brought about by human agency".

Picture of "Congolese men holding cut off hands" captured byAlice Seeley HarrisinBaringa,May 1904

Historians have argued that comparisons drawn in the press by some between the death toll of the Free State atrocities and the Holocaust duringWorld War IIhave been responsible for creating undue confusion over the issue of terminology.In one incident, the Japanese newspaperYomiuri Shimbunused the word "genocide" in the title of a 2005 article by Hochschild. Hochschild himself criticised the title as "misleading" and stated that it had been chosen "without my knowledge". Similar criticism was echoed by historianJean-Luc Vellut.

Allegations of genocide in the Free State have become common over time.Martin Ewanswrote, "Leopold's African regime became a byword for exploitation and genocide."According to historianTimothy J. Stapleton,"Those who easily apply the term genocide to Leopold's regime seem to do so purely on the basis of its obvious horror and the massive numbers of people who may have perished."Robert Weisbordargued that there does not have to be intent to exterminate all members of a population in a genocide.He posited that "an endeavor to eliminate a portion of a people would qualify as genocide" according to the UN standards and asserted that the Free State did as much.Jeanne Haskin, Yaa-Lengi Meema Ngemi, andDavid Olusogaalso referred to the atrocities as a genocide.In an unpublished manuscript from the 1950s, Lemkin, who had first coined the term "genocide" in 1944, asserted the occurrence of "an unambiguous genocide" in the Free State, though he blamed the violence on what he saw as "the savagery of African colonial troops".Lemkin emphasized that the atrocities were usually committed by Africans themselves who were in the pay of the Belgians.These "native militia" were described by Lemkin as "an unorganized and disorderly rabble of savages whose only recompense was what they obtained from looting, and when they were cannibals, as was usually the case, in eating the foes against whom they were sent".Genocide scholarAdam Jonesclaimed that the underrepresentation of males in Congolese population figures after Leopold's rule is evidence that "outright genocide" was the cause of a large portion of deaths in the Free State.

In 1999 Hochschild publishedKing Leopold's Ghost,a book detailing the atrocities committed during the Free State's existence. The book became a bestseller in Belgium, but aroused criticism from former Belgian colonialists and some academics as exaggerating the extent of the atrocities and population decline.Around the 50th anniversary of the Congo's independence from Belgium in 2010, numerous Belgian writers published content about the Congo. Historian Idesbald Goddeeris criticised these works—including Van Reybrouk'sCongo: A History—for taking a softened stance on the atrocities committed in the Congolese Free State, saying "They acknowledge the dark period of the Congo Free State, but... they emphasize that the number of victims was unknown and that the terror was concentrated in particular regions. "

The term "Congolese genocide" is often used in an unrelated sense to refer to the mass murder and rape committed in the eastern Congo in the aftermath of theRwandan genocide(and the ensuingSecond Congo War) between 1998 and 2003.

Black War

This section is an excerpt fromBlack War § Academic discussion of genocide.[edit]

The near-destruction of Tasmania's Aboriginal population has been described as an act of genocide by historians includingRobert Hughes,James Boyce,Lyndall Ryan,Tom Lawson,Mohamed Adhikari,Benjamin Madley, and Ashley Riley Sousa.The author of the concept of genocide,Raphael Lemkin,considered Tasmania the site of one of the world's clear cases of genocideand Hughes has described the loss of Aboriginal Tasmanians as "the only true genocide in English colonial history".However, other historians – includingHenry Reynolds,Richard Broome,and Nicholas Clements – do not agree that the colonial authorities pursued a policy of destroying the Indigenous population, although they acknowledge that some settlers supported extermination.

Boyce has claimed that the April 1828 "Proclamation Separating the Aborigines from the White Inhabitants" sanctioned force against Aboriginal people "for no other reason than that they were Aboriginal". However, as Reynolds, Broome and Clements point out, there was open warfare at the time.Boyce describes the decision to remove all Aboriginal Tasmanians after 1832—by which time they had given up their fight against white colonists—as an extreme policy position. He concludes: "The colonial government from 1832 to 1838ethnically cleansedthe western half of Van Diemen's Land and then callously left the exiled people to their fate. "

As early as 1852John West'sHistory of Tasmaniaportrayed the obliteration of Tasmania's Aboriginal people as an example of "systematic massacre"and in the 1979High Courtcase ofCoe v Commonwealth of Australia,judgeLionel Murphyobserved that Aboriginal people did not give up their land peacefully and that they were killed or forcibly removed from their land "in what amounted to attempted (and in Tasmania almost complete) genocide".

HistorianHenry Reynoldssays there was a widespread call from settlers during thefrontier warsfor the "extirpation" or "extermination" of the Aboriginal people.But he has contended that the British government acted as a source of restraint on settlers' actions. Reynolds says there is no evidence the British government deliberately planned the wholesale destruction of indigenous Tasmanians—a November 1830 letter to Arthur by Sir George Murray warned that the extinction of the race would leave "an indelible stain upon the character of the British Government"—and therefore what eventuated does not meet the definition of genocide codified in the 1948United Nations convention.He says Arthur was determined to defeat the Aboriginal people and take their land, but believes there is little evidence he had aims beyond that objective and wished to destroy the Tasmanian race.In contrast to Reynolds' argument, historian Lyndall Ryan, based on a sample of massacres taking place in the Meander River region in June 1827, concludes that massacres of Aboriginal Tasmanians by white settlers were likely part of an organised process and were sanctioned by government authorities.

Clements accepts Reynolds' argument but also exonerates the colonists themselves of the charge of genocide. He says that unlike genocidal determinations byNazis against Jewsin World War II,Hutus against TutsisinRwandaandOttomans against Armeniansin present-dayTurkey,which were carried out for ideological reasons, Tasmanian settlers participated in violence largely out of revenge and self-preservation. He adds: "Even those who were motivated by sex or morbid thrillseeking lacked any ideological impetus to exterminate the natives." He also argues that while genocides are inflicted on defeated, captive or otherwise vulnerable minorities, Tasmanian natives appeared as a "capable and terrifying enemy" to colonists and were killed in the context of a war in which both sides killed noncombatants.

Lawson, in a critique of Reynolds' stand, argues that genocide was the inevitable outcome of a set of British policies to colonise Van Diemen's Land.He says the British government endorsed the use of partitioning and "absolute force" against Tasmanians, approved Robinson's "Friendly Mission" and colluded in transforming that mission into a campaign of ethnic cleansing from 1832. He says that once on Flinders Island, indigenous peoples were taught to farm land like Europeans and worship God like Europeans and concludes: "The campaign of transformation enacted on Flinders Island amounted to cultural genocide."

Bosnian genocide

Memorial stone at theSrebrenica-Potočari Memorial Centre

Further information:Bosnian genocide

See also:Bosnian genocide denial

The term "Bosnian genocide"refers to either theSrebrenica massacre,or the widercrimes against humanityandethnic cleansingcampaign which was waged throughout the areas ofBosnia and Herzegovinawhich were controlled by theArmy of Republika Srpska(VRS)during theBosnian Warof 1992–1995.The events in Srebrenica in 1995 included the killing of more than 8,000Bosniak(Bosnian Muslim) men and boys, as well as the mass expulsion of another 25,000–30,000 Bosniak civilians by VRS units under the command of GeneralRatko Mladić.

In the 1990s, several authorities asserted that the ethnic cleansing campaign which was carried out by elements of the Bosnian Serb army was agenocide.These included a resolution by theUnited Nations General Assemblyand three convictions for genocide in German courts (the convictions were based upon a wider interpretation of genocide than that used byinternational courts).In 2005, theUnited States Congresspassed a resolution declaring that "the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide."

TheSrebrenica massacrewas found to be an act of genocide by theInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia(ICTY), a finding which was upheld by theInternational Court of Justice(ICJ).On 24 March 2016, former Bosnian Serb leader and the first president of theRepublika Srpska,Radovan Karadžić,was found guilty ofgenocideinSrebrenica,war crimes,andcrimes against humanityand sentenced to 40 years in prison. In 2019 an appeals court increased his sentence tolife imprisonment.The ICTY found the acts to have satisfied the requirements for "guilty acts" of genocide, and that, "some physical perpetrators held the intent to physically destroy the protected groups of Bosnian Muslims andCroats".

California genocide

This section is an excerpt fromCalifornia genocide § Apologies and name changes.[edit]

In a speech before representatives of Native American peoples in June, 2019, California governorGavin Newsomapologized for the genocide. Newsom referring to the proposedCalifornia Truth and Healing Councilsaid, "California must reckon with our dark history. California Native American peoples suffered violence, discrimination and exploitation sanctioned by state government throughout its history.... It's called genocide. That's what it was, a genocide. No other way to describe it. And that's the way it needs to be described in the history books. We can never undo the wrongs inflicted on the peoples who have lived on this land that we now call California since time immemorial, but we can work together to build bridges, tell the truth about our past and begin to heal deep wounds."After hearing testimony, a Truth and Healing Council will clarify the historical record on the relationship between the state and California Native Americans.

In November 2021, the board of directors of theUniversity of California Hastings College of Lawvoted to change the name of the institution because of namesakeS. C. Hastings's involvement in the killing and dispossessing ofYuki peoplein the 1850s.

Circassian genocide

This section is an excerpt fromCircassian genocide § Georgia.[edit]

On 21 May 2011, theParliament of Georgiapassed a resolution stating that pre-planned mass killings of Circassians by Imperial Russia, accompanied by "deliberate famine and epidemics", should be recognized as "genocide", and that those deported during those events from their homeland should be recognized as "refugees". Georgia has made outreach efforts to North Caucasian ethnic groups since the 2008Russo-Georgian War.Following aconsultation with academics, human rights activists and Circassian diaspora groupsand parliamentary discussions in Tbilisi in 2010 and 2011, Georgia became the first country to use the word "genocide" to refer to the events.On 20 May 2011 the parliament of the Republic of Georgia declared in its resolutionthat the mass annihilation of the Cherkess (Adyghe) people during the Russian-Caucasian war and thereafter constitutedgenocideas defined in theHague Convention of 1907and theUN Convention of 1948.The next year, on the same day of 21 May, a monument was erected inAnaklia,Georgia,to commemorate the suffering of the Circassians.

Deportation of the Chechens and Ingush

This section is an excerpt fromDeportation of the Chechens and Ingush § Genocide question.[edit]

Meeting in Strasbourg on February 23, 2017 dedicated to the anniversary of deportation

The forced relocation, slaughter, and conditions during and after transfer have been described as an act ofgenocideby various scholars as well as the European Parliamenton the basis of theIV Hague Convention of 1907and theConvention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocideof theU.N. General Assembly(adopted in 1948), including French historian and expert on communist studiesNicolas Werth,German historian Philipp Ther,Professor Anthony James Joes,American journalistEric Margolis,Canadian political scientistAdam Jones,professor ofIslamic Historyat theUniversity of Massachusetts DartmouthBrian Glyn Williams,scholars Michael Fredholmand Fanny E. Bryan.Raphael Lemkin,alawyerofPolish-Jewishdescent who initiated the Genocide Convention, assumed that genocide was perpetrated in the context of the mass deportation of the Chechens, Ingush, Volga Germans, Crimean Tatars, Kalmyks and Karachay.German investigative journalistLutz Klevemancompared the deportation to a "slow genocide".In this case this was acknowledged by theEuropean Parliamentas an act of genocide in 2004:

...Believes that the deportation of the entire Chechen people to Central Asia on 23 February 1944 on the orders of Stalin constitutes an act of genocide within the meaning of the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907 and the Convention for the Prevention and Repression of the Crime of Genocide adopted by the UN General Assembly on 9 December 1948.

On 26 April 1991 the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Socialist Federal Soviet Republic, under its chairmanBoris Yeltsin,passed the law On the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples with Article 2 denouncing all mass deportations as "Stalin's policy of defamation andgenocide."Experts of theUnited States Holocaust Memorial Museumcited the events of 1944 for a reason of placing Chechnya on their genocide watch list for its potential for genocide.Theseparatist government of Chechnyaalso recognized it as genocide.Members of theChechen diasporaand their supporters promote 23 February as World Chechnya Day to commemorate the victims.

The Chechens and Ingush, along with the Karachai and Balkars, are represented in theConfederation of Repressed Peoples(CRP), an organization that covers the former Soviet Union and aims to support and rehabilitate the rights of the deported peoples.

Deportation of the Crimean Tatars

This section is an excerpt fromDeportation of the Crimean Tatars § Genocide question and recognition.[edit]

Ukrainian coin commemorating the Genocide of the Crimean Tatars, issued 2015

Theprojection mappinginKyivin 2020 for the Day of Remembrance for the victims of the Crimean Tatar genocide

Some activists, politicians, scholars, countries, and historians go even further and consider the deportation a crime ofgenocideorcultural genocide.Norman Naimarkwrites "[t]he Chechens and Ingush, the Crimean Tatars, and other 'punished peoples' of the wartime period were, indeed, slated for elimination, if not physically, then as self-identifying nationalities."Professor Lyman H. Legters argued that the Soviet penal system, combined with its resettlement policies, should count as genocidal since the sentences were borne most heavily specifically on certain ethnic groups, and that a relocation of these ethnic groups, whose survival depends on ties to its particular homeland, "had a genocidal effect remediable only by restoration of the group to its homeland."Political scientist Stephen Blank described it both as a deportation and a genocide, a centuries-long Russian "technique of self-colonial rule intended to eliminate" minorities.Soviet dissidentsIlya GabayandPyotr Grigorenkoboth classified the event as a genocide. HistorianTimothy Snyderincluded it in a list of Soviet policies that “meet the standard of genocide."HistoriansAlexandre BennigsenandMarie Bennigsen-Broxupincluded the case of Crimean Tatars and Meskhetian Turks as two examples of successful genocides by Soviet governments. They summed it up by saying that Crimean Tatars, "a nation which for over five centuries had played a major part in the history of Eastern Europe has simply ceased to exist".Polish scholarTomasz Kamusellaobserved that Moscow attempted an "unmaking of Crimean Tatars and their language" by not allowing them even to be registered as Crimean Tatars since the deportation; they could only declare themselves as Tatars. It wasn't until the 1989 census that Crimean Tatars were again recognized as a separate nationality. TheCrimean Tatar languagewas only allowed to be taught again in Soviet schools in the 1980s.

On 12 December 2015, theUkrainian Parliamentissued a resolution recognizing this event as genocide and established 18 May as the "Day of Remembrance for the victims of the Crimean Tatar genocide."Theparliament of Latviarecognized the event as an act of genocide on 9 May 2019.TheParliament of Lithuaniadid the same on 6 June 2019.The Canadian Parliament passed a motion on June 10, 2019, recognizing the Crimean Tatar deportation of 1944 (Sürgünlik) as a genocide perpetrated by Soviet dictator Stalin, designating May 18 to be a day of remembrance.On 26 April 1991 the Supreme Soviet of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, under its chairmanBoris Yeltsin,passed the law On the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples with Article 2 denouncing all mass deportations as "Stalin's policy of defamation andgenocide."

#	Name	Date of recognition	Source
1	Ukraine	12 December 2015
2	Latvia	9 May 2019
3	Lithuania	6 June 2019
4	Canada	10 June 2019
5	Poland	12 July 2024

A minority dispute defining the event as genocide. According to Alexander Statiev, theSoviet deportationsresulted in a "genocidaldeath rate",but Stalin did not havethe intentto exterminatethese peoples.He considers such deportations merely an example ofSoviet assimilationof "unwanted nations."According toAmir Weiner,the Soviet regime sought to eradicate "only" their "territorial identity".Such views were criticized by Jon Chang as "gentrifiedracism"andhistorical revisionism.He noted that the deportations had been in fact based on ethnicity of victims.

Draining of the Mesopotamian Marshes

This section is an excerpt fromDraining of the Mesopotamian Marshes.[edit]

A 1994 map of the Mesopotamian Marshes with the pink zones showing drained areas

TheMesopotamian Marsheswere drained inIraqand to a smaller degree inIranbetween the 1950s and 1990s to clear large areas of themarshesin theTigris-Euphrates river system.The marshes formerly covered an area of around 20,000 km²(7,700 sq mi). The main sub-marshes, theHawizeh,Central,andHammarmarshes, were drained at different times for different reasons.

In the 1990s, the marshes were drained for political motives, namely to force theMarsh Arabsout of the area and to punish them for their role in the1991 uprisingagainst Saddam Hussein's government.However, the government's stated reasoning was to reclaim land for agriculture and exterminate breeding grounds for mosquitoes.The displacement of more than 200,000 of the Ahwaris, and the associated state-sponsored campaign of violence against them, has led the United States and others to describe the draining of the marshes asecocideorethnic cleansing.

The draining of the Mesopotamian Marshes has been described by theUnited Nationsas a "tragic human and environmental catastrophe" on par with thedeforestation of the Amazon rainforestand by other observers as one of the worst environmental disasters of the 20th century.

Genocide of Yazidis by ISIL

This section is an excerpt fromYazidi genocide § Classification as a genocide.[edit]

Yazidi Genocide Monument inYerevan,Armenia

Many international organisations, governments and parliaments, as well as groups have classified ISIL's treatment of the Yazidis as genocide, and condemned it as such. The Genocide of Yazidis has been officially recognized by several bodies of theUnited Nationsand theEuropean Parliament.Some states have recognized it as well, including theNational Assembly of Armenia,theAustralian parliament,theBritish Parliament,theCanadian parliament,and theUnited States House of Representatives.Multiple individual human rights activists such asNazand Begikhaniand Dr.Widad Akrawihave also advocated for this view.

In 2017, CNN journalists Jomana Karadsheh and Chris Jackson interviewed former Yazidi captives and exclusively filmed the Daesh Criminal Investigations Unit (DCIU), a team of Iraqi Kurdish and western investigators who have been operating secretly in Northern Iraq, for more than two years, collecting evidence of ISIS’ war crimes.

• United Nations:
  • In a March 2015 report, the persecution of the Yazidi people was qualified as a genocide by theOffice of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights(UNHCR). The organization cited the numerous atrocities such asforced religious conversionandsexual slaveryas being parts of an overall malicious campaign.
  • In August 2017, theIndependent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republicof theUnited Nations Human Rights Council(UNHRC) stated that 'IS committed the crime of genocide by seeking to destroy the Yazidis through killings, sexual slavery, enslavement, torture, forcible displacement, the transfer of children and measures intended to prohibit the birth of Yazidi children.' It added that the genocide was ongoing, and stating that the international community still must recognize the detrimental effects of the genocide. The Commission wrote that, while some countries may choose to overlook the idea of the genocide, the atrocities need to be understood and the international community needs to bring the killings to an end.
  • In 2018, the Security Council team enforced the idea of a new accountability team that would collect evidence of the international crimes committed by the Islamic State. However, the international community has not been in full support of this idea, because it can sometimes oversee the crimes that other armed groups are involved in.
  • On 10 May 2021, the United Nations Investigative Team to Promote Accountability for Crimes Committed by Da'esh/IS (UNITAD) determined that ISIL's actions in Iraq constituted genocide.
• Council of Europe:On 27 January 2016, theParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europeadopted a resolution stating: "individuals who act in the name of the terrorist entity which calls itself 'Islamic State' (Daesh)... have perpetrated acts of genocide and other serious crimes punishable under international law. States should act on the presumption that Daesh commits genocide and should be aware that this entails action under the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide." However, it did not identify victims.
• European Union:On 4 February 2016, theEuropean Parliamentunanimously passed a resolution to recognise 'that the so-called 'ISIS/Daesh' is committing genocide against Christians and Yazidis, and other religious and ethnic minorities, who do not agree with the so-called 'ISIS/Daesh' interpretation of Islam, and that this therefore entails action under the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.'Additionally, it called for those who intentionally committed atrocities for ethnic or religious reasons to be brought to justice for violating international law, and committing crimes against humanity, and genocide.
• United States:TheUnited States Department of Statehas formally recognised the Yazidi genocide in areas under the control of ISIS in 2016 and 2017.On 14 March 2016, theUnited States House of Representativesvoted unanimously 393-0 that violent actions performed against Yazidis, Christians,Shiaand other groups by IS were acts of genocide. Days later on 17 March 2016,United States Secretary of StateJohn Kerrydeclared that the violence initiated by IS against the Yazidis and others amounted to genocide.
• United Kingdom:On 20 April 2016, theHouse of Commons of the United Kingdomunanimously supported a motion to declare that the treatment of Yazidis and Christians by the Islamic State amounted to genocide, to condemn it as such, and to refer the issue to the UN Security Council. In doing so,ConservativeMPs defied their own party's government, who had tried to dissuade them from making such a statement, because of the Foreign Office legal department's long-standing policy (dating back to the 1948 passing of the Genocide Convention) of refusing to give a legal description to potential war crimes. Foreign Office secretaryTobias Ellwood– who was jeered at and interrupted by MPs during his speech in the debate – stated that he personally believed genocide had taken place, but that it was not up to politicians to make that determination, but to the courts.Furthermore, on 23 March 2017, the regional devolvedScottish Parliamentadopted a motion stating: '[The Scottish Parliament] recognises and condemns the genocide perpetrated against the Yezidi people by Daesh [ISIS]; acknowledges the great human suffering and loss that have been inflicted by bigotry, brutality and religious intolerance, [and] further acknowledges and condemns the crimes perpetrated by Daesh against Muslims, Christians, Arabs, Kurds and all of the religious and ethnic communities of Iraq and Syria; welcomes the actions of the US Congress, the European Parliament, the French Senate, the UN and others in formally recognising the genocide'.
• Canada:On 25 October 2016, theHouse of Commons of Canadaunanimously supported a motion tabled by MPMichelle Rempel Garner(CPC) to recognise that ISIS was committing genocide against the Yazidi people, to acknowledge that ISIS still kept many Yazidi women and girls captive as sex slaves, to support and take action on a recent UN commission report, and provide asylum to Yazidi women and girls within 120 days.
• France:On 6 December 2016, theFrench Senateunanimously approved a resolution stating that acts committed by the Islamic State against "the Christian and Yazidi populations, other minorities and civilians" were "war crimes", "crimes against humanity", and constituted a "genocide". It also invited the government to "use all legal channels" to have these crimes recognised, and the perpetrators tried.TheNational Assemblyadopted a similar resolution two days later (originally tabled on 25 May 2016 byYves FromionofThe Republicans), with theSocialist, Ecologist and Republican groupabstaining and the other groups approving.
• Armenia:In January 2018, the Armenian parliament recognised and condemned the 2014 genocide of Yazidis by the Islamic State, and called on the international community to conduct an international investigation into the events.
• Israel:On 21 November 2018, a bill tabled by opposition MPKsenia Svetlova(ZU) to recognise the Islamic State's killing of Yazidis as a genocide was defeated in a 58 to 38 vote in theKnesset.Thecoalition partiesmotivated their rejection of the bill by saying that the United Nations had not yet recognised it as a genocide.
• Iraq:On 1 March 2021,the Iraq parliamentpassed the Yazidi [Female] Survivors Bill which provides assistance to survivors and "determines the atrocities perpetrated byDaeshagainst the Yazidis, Turkmen, Christians and Shabaks to be genocide and crimes against humanity. "The law provides compensation, measures for rehabilitation and reintegration, pensions, provision of land, housing, and education, and a quota in public sector employment.On 10 May 2021, the United Nations Investigative Team to Promote Accountability for Crimes Committed by Da'esh/IS (UNITAD) determined that ISIL's actions in Iraq constituted genocide.
• Belgium:On 30 June 2021, the Foreign Relations Commission of theBelgian Chamber of Representativesunanimously approved a resolution by opposition representativesGeorges Dallemagne(cdH) andKoen Metsu(N-VA) to recognise ISIL's August 2014 massacre of thousands of Yazidi men and enslavement of thousands of Yazidi women and children as genocide. The resolution, which would likely also pass with overwhelming approval in the Chamber itself, called on the Belgian government to increase its efforts to support victims, and prosecute perpetrators (either at theInternational Criminal Court,or at a new ad hoc tribunal).On 17 July 2021, the Belgian parliament unanimously voted to recognize the suffering of the Yazidis at the hands of the Islamic State (ISIS) in 2014 as a genocide.
• Netherlands:On 6 July 2021, theDutch House of Representativesunanimously passed a motion tabled by MPAnne Kuik(CDA) which recognised the crimes of Islamic State against the Yazidi population as a genocide and crimes against humanity.
• Germany:On 19 January 2023, the GermanBundestagunanimously recognized the crimes against Yazidis as genocide.The resolution, which was jointly tabled by the government and the opposition, also calls for prosecution of the perpetrators and aid for rebuilding Yazidi villages.

Greek genocide

This section is an excerpt fromGreek genocide § Political recognition.[edit]

Monument inArgos,Greece for the Greek genocide and the Holocaust

Following an initiative of MPs of the so-called "patriotic" wing of the rulingPASOKparty's parliamentary group and like-minded MPs of conservativeNew Democracy,theGreek Parliamentpassed two laws on the fate of the Ottoman Greeks; the first in 1994 and the second in 1998. The decrees were published in the GreekGovernment Gazetteon 8 March 1994 and 13 October 1998 respectively. The 1994 decree, created byGeorgios Daskalakis,affirmed the genocide in the Pontus region of Asia Minor and designated 19 May (thedayMustafa Kemallanded inSamsunin 1919) a day of commemoration,(called Pontian Greek Genocide Remembrance Day) while the 1998 decree affirmed the genocide of Greeks in Asia Minor as a whole and designated 14 September a day of commemoration.These laws were signed by the President of Greece but were not immediately ratified after political interventions. After leftist newspaperI Avgiinitiated a campaign against the application of this law, the subject became subject of a political debate. The president of the left-ecologistSynaspismospartyNikos Konstantopoulosand historian Angelos Elefantis,known for his books on the history of Greek communism, were two of the major figures of the political left who expressed their opposition to the decree. However, the non-parliamentaryleft-wing nationalistintellectual and author George Karabelias bitterly criticized Elefantis and others opposing the recognition of genocide and called them "revisionist historians", accusing the Greek mainstream left of a "distorted ideological evolution". He said that for the Greek left 19 May is a "day of amnesia".

In the late 2000s theCommunist Party of Greeceadopted the term "Genocide of the Pontic (Greeks)" (Γενοκτονία Ποντίων) in its official newspaperRizospastisand participates in memorial events.

TheRepublic of Cyprushas also officially called the events "Greek Genocide in Pontus of Asia Minor".

In response to the 1998 law, the Turkish government released a statement which claimed that describing the events as genocide was "without any historical basis". "We condemn and protest this resolution" a Turkish Foreign Ministry statement said. "With this resolution the Greek Parliament, which in fact has to apologize to the Turkish people for the large-scale destruction and massacres Greece perpetrated inAnatolia,not only sustains the traditional Greek policy of distorting history, but it also displays that the expansionist Greek mentality is still alive, "the statement added.

On 11 March 2010,Sweden'sRiksdagpassed a motion recognising "as an act of genocide the killing of Armenians, Assyrians/Syriacs/Chaldeans and Pontic Greeks in 1915".

On 14 May 2013, the government ofNew South Waleswas submitted a genocide recognition motion byFred Nileof theChristian Democratic Party,which was later passed making it the fourth political entity to recognise the genocide.

In March 2015, theNational Assembly of Armeniaunanimously adopted a resolution recognizing both the Greek and Assyrian genocides.

In April 2015, theStates General of the Netherlandsand theAustrian Parliamentpassed resolutions recognizing the Greek and Assyrian genocides.

1888–1893 Uprisings of Hazaras

This section is an excerpt fromHazara genocide (19th century) § Legacy.[edit]

The Hazara diaspora mourns the deaths of the victims of the Hazara uprisings of the 1890s on September 25 (called the "Hazara Black Day" ) and it wants the International community to recognize the subjugation of the Hazaras as agenocide.

Holocaust

Further information:International response to the Holocaust,Holocaust denial,andLegality of Holocaust denial

In the international community, there is a virtually unanimous consensus that in the early 1940s,the Holocaustwasprimarily committedagainst theJewsandother minoritiesbyNazi Germany,due tothe existence of an overwhelming amount of evidence,but there are some differences innames and definitions,periodisation, scope (for example, some historians believe that the1941–44 Romani genocide/Porajmosshould be recognised as a part of the Holocaust,however, other historians believe that it should be recognized as a separate genocide which was simultaneously committed with the Holocaust),attributed responsibility,andmotivation.There is a wide range ofHolocaust memorial days,memorials and museums,andeducational policies.Unlike the politics which surrounds other genocides, much of the politics which surrounds the Holocaust is not focused on the formal recognition of it in political statements (since there already is a strong consensus with regard to it), instead, it is focused on theimportance of the Holocaust,which aspects of the Holocaust should be emphasised, how to prevent the Holocaust or similar genocides from happening again, how to combatHolocaust denial,andwhether Holocaust denial should be legal or illegal.Some regimes, politicians or organisations may occasionally deny ordownplaythe Holocaust for various reasons, such asantisemitism,oppositionto the existence of theState of Israel,or a desire to compare the Holocaust to other genocides because they consider the importance of those genocides either similar to or greater than the importance of the Holocaust.

Holodomor

This section is an excerpt fromHolodomor in modern politics § Recognition.[edit]

Recognition of the Holodomor by country

Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognised as agenocideby theUkrainian parliament.Ukraine'sMinistry of Foreign Affairshas run campaigns and lobbied theUnited Nationsand theCouncil of Europeto recognise the Holodomor as a genocide internationally.Sovereign states to have recognized Holodomor as genocideincludeAustralia,Belgium,Brazil,Bulgaria,Canada,Colombia,Czech Republic,Ecuador,Estonia,France,Georgia,Germany,Hungary,Iceland,Ireland's senate,Italy,Latvia,Lithuania,Mexico,Moldova,Netherlands,Paraguay,Peru,Poland,Portugal,Romania,Slovakia,Slovenia,Spain,Ukraine,United Kingdom,United States,theHoly SeeinVatican CityandWales.As theUnited States Congresspassed resolution of recognition through theUnited States Senateand theUnited States House of Representatives.Similarly, governments and parliaments of several other countries have also officially recognized the Holodomor as an act of genocide.

In November 2022, the Holodomor was recognized as a genocide byGermany,Ireland's senate,Moldova,Romania,and theBelarusian opposition in exile.Pope Franciscompared the Russian war in Ukraine with its targeteddestruction of civilian infrastructureto the "terrible Holodomor Genocide", during an address at St. Peter's Square.As of July 2024, 35 countries recognise the Holodomor as a genocide.

The following countries have recognised the Holodomor as a genocide:

• Australia,28 October 1993
• Austria,16 December 2022
• Belgium,10 March 2023
• Brazil,26 April 2022
• Bulgaria,1 February 2023
• Canada,20 June 2003
• Colombia,21 December 2007
• Croatia,moved 15 June 2023,approved 28 June 2023
• Czech Republic,6 April 2022
• Ecuador,30 October 2007
• Estonia,20 October 1993
• France,28 March 2023
• Georgia,20 December 2005
• Germany,30 November 2022
• Hungary,26 November 2003
• Iceland,22 March 2023
• Ireland,24 November 2022 (resolution passed by theSeanad,still needed from theDáil)
• Italy,26 July 2023
• Latvia,13 March 2008
• Lithuania,24 November 2005
• Luxembourg,13 June 2023
• Mexico,19 February 2008
• Moldova,24 November 2022
• Netherlands,7 July 2023
• Paraguay,25 October 2007
• Peru,19 June 2007
• Poland,4 December 2006
• Portugal,2 March 2017
• Romania,24 November 2022
• Slovakia,20 June 2023
• Slovenia,23 May 2023
• Spain,4 June 2024
• Ukraine,28 November 2006
• United Kingdom,25 May 2023 (resolution passed by theHouse of Commons)
  • Wales,25 October 2023
• United States,11 December 2018 (resolution passed by theHouse of Representatives;on 4 October 2018 resolution passed by theSenate)
• Vatican City,2 April 2004

Other political bodies whose legislatures have passed a resolution recognizing Holodomor as a genocide:

• EU,15 December 2022
• Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe,12 October 2023
• Chechen Republic of Ichkeria(government in exile), 19 April 2023

Many countries have signed declarations in statements at theUnited Nations General Assemblyaffirming that the Holodomor was as a "national tragedy of the Ukrainian people" caused by the "cruel actions and policies of the totalitarian regime".Similar statements were passed as resolutions by international organizationssuch as theEuropean Parliament,theParliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe(PACE),theOrganization for Security and Cooperation in Europe(OSCE),and theUnited Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture(UNESCO).

Countries to have signed declarations for theUnited Nationson the HolodomorincludeAlbania,Argentina,Australia,Austria,Azerbaijan,Belgium,Bulgaria,Canada,Chile,Colombia,Czechia,Croatia,Denmark,Ecuador,Estonia,Finland,France,Georgia, Hungary,Iceland,Ireland,Israel,Latvia,Liechtenstein,Lithuania,Luxembourg,Mexico, Moldova,Monaco,Montenegro,Paraguay, Peru, Poland,Portugal,Slovakia,Spain,Ukraine, and the United States.

Romani genocide

This section is an excerpt fromRomani Holocaust § Recognition and remembrance.[edit]

Memorial to the Sinti and Roma Victims of the Nazisin Berlin, Germany

The German government paidwar reparationsto Jewish survivors of the Holocaust, but not to the Romani. There were "never any consultations at Nuremberg or any other international conference as to whether the Sinti and Roma were entitled like the Jews to reparations."The Interior Ministry of Wuerttemberg argued that "Gypsies [were] persecuted under the Nazis not for any racial reason but because of an asocial and criminal record".When on trial for his leadership ofEinsatzgruppenin the USSR,Otto Ohlendorfcited the massacres of Roma people during theThirty Years Waras a historical precedent.

TheEuropean Roma Rights Centrein 2017 gave more details of the chronology of recognition and reparations:

After World War II Roma were also excluded from the right to restitution, because Federal German authorities denied that Roma were persecued due to racist reasons. After a small step in this direction in 1963, restitutions became possible in small amounts only in 1979, when the West German Federal Parliament declared that the Nazi persecution of Roma was based onracial groundsand Roma survivors were allowed to claim for restitution in a form of a onetime payment. The official acceptance of the Porajmos as genocide by the Federal Republic of Germany followed only in 1982 with a speech by Chancelor Helmut Schmidt. In August 2016, an agreement between the German Ministry for Finance and the Foreign Ministry of the Czech Republic decided on compensation for survivors of the Porajmos in the Czech Republic. This agreement, which will give 2,500 EUR to each of the handful of survivors, was greeted as a symbolic acknowledgment, but also criticised for its delay and the low amount awarded. However, this agreement has already led to renewed claims from Romani victims from the former Yugoslavia and other regions of 'romocide'.

In the historiography of East Germany (GDR), the persecution of Sinti and Roma under National Socialism was largely taboo. The German historian Anne-Kathleen Tillack-Graf states that in the GDR, Sinti and Roma were not mentioned as concentration camp prisoners during the official commemorations of the liberation at the three national memorial sitesBuchenwald,Sachsenhausen,andRavensbrück,just likehomosexuals,Jehovah's Witnessesandasocial detainees.West Germany recognised the genocide of the Roma in 1982,and since then the Porajmos has been increasingly recognized as a genocide committed simultaneously with the Shoah.The American historianSybil Miltonwrote several articles arguing that the Porajmos deserved recognition as part of the Holocaust.In Switzerland, a committee of experts investigated the policy of the Swiss government during the Porajmos.

Nico Fortuna, a sociologist and Roma activist, explained the distinction between Jewish collective memory of the Holocaust and the Roma experience:

There is a difference between the Jewish and Roma deportees... The Jews were shocked and can remember the year, date and time it happened. The Roma shrugged it off. They said, "Of course I was deported. I'm Roma; these things happen to a Roma." The Roma mentality is different from the Jewish mentality. For example, a Roma came to me and asked, "Why do you care so much about these deportations? Your family was not deported." I went, "I care as a Roma" and the guy said back, "I do not care because my family were brave, proud Roma that were not deported."
For the Jews it was total and everyone knew this—from bankers to pawnbrokers. For the Roma it was selective and not comprehensive. The Roma were only exterminated in a few parts of Europe such as Poland, the Netherlands, Germany and France. In Romania and much of the Balkans, only nomadic Roma and social outcast Roma were deported. This matters and influences the Roma mentality.

Ian Hancock has also observed a reluctance among Roma to acknowledge their victimization by the Third Reich. The Roma "are traditionally not disposed to keeping alive the terrible memories from their history—nostalgia is a luxury for others".The effects of the illiteracy, the lack of social institutions, and the rampant discrimination faced by Roma in Europe today have produced a people who, according to Fortuna, lack a "national consciousness... and historical memory of the Holocaust because there is no Roma elite."

Persecution of Uyghurs in China

This section is an excerpt fromPersecution of Uyghurs in China § Genocide.[edit]

In April 2019,Cornell Universityanthropologist Magnus Fiskesjö wrote inInside Higher Edthat mass arrests of ethnic minority academics and intellectuals in Xin gian g indicated that "the Chinese regime's current campaign against the native Uighur, Kazakh and other peoples is already a genocide."Later, in 2020, Fiskejö wrote in academic journalMonde Chinoisthat "[t]he evidence for genocide is thus already massive, and must, at the very least, be regarded as sufficient for prosecution under international law... the number of competent authorities around the world concurring that this is indeed genocide are increasing."

In June 2020, after anAssociated Pressinvestigation found that Uyghurs were being subjected to mass forced sterilizations and forced abortions in Xin gian g, scholars increasingly have referred to the abuses in Xin gian g as a genocide.

In July 2020, Zenz said an interview withNational Public Radio(NPR) that he had previously argued that the actions of the Chinese government are a cultural genocide, not a "literal genocide", but that one of the five criteria from theGenocide Conventionwas satisfied by more recent developments concerning the suppression of birth rates so "we do need to probably call it a genocide".The same month, the last colonial governor ofBritish Hong Kong,Chris Patten,said that the "birth control campaign" was "arguably something that comes within the terms of the UN views on sorts of genocide".

Although China is not a member of theInternational Criminal Court,on 6 July 2020 the self-proclaimedEast Turkistan Government-in-Exileand theEast Turkistan National Awakening Movementfileda complaint with the ICCcalling for it to investigate PRC officials for crimes against Uyghurs including allegations of genocide.The ICC responded in December 2020 and "asked for more evidence before it will be willing to open an investigation into claims of genocide against Uighur people by China, but has said it will keep the file open for such further evidence to be submitted."

An August 2020Quartzarticle reported that some scholars hesitate to label the human rights abuses in Xin gian g as a "full-blown genocide", preferring the term "cultural genocide", but that increasingly many experts were calling them "crimes against humanity" or "genocide".In August 2020 the spokesperson forJoe Biden's presidential campaign described China's actions as genocide.

In October 2020, theU.S. Senateintroduced a bipartisan resolution designating thehuman rights abusesperpetrated by the Chinese government against the Uyghur people and other ethnic minorities in Xin gian g as genocide.Around the same time, theHouse of Commons of Canadaissued a statement that its Subcommittee on International Human Rights of theStanding Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Developmentwas persuaded that theChinese Communist Party's actions in Xin gian g constitute genocide as laid out in the Genocide Convention.The 2020 annual report by theCongressional-Executive Commission on Chinareferred to the Chinese government's treatment of Uyghurs as "crimes against humanity and possibly genocide."

In January 2021, U.S. secretary of stateMike Pompeoofficially declared that China was committing genocide against the Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities living in Xin gian g.This declaration, which came in the final hours of the Trump administration, had not been made earlier due to a worry that it could disrupt trade talks between the US and China. On the allegations of crimes against humanity Pompeo asserted that "These crimes are ongoing and include: the arbitrary imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty of more than one million civilians, forced sterilization, torture of a large number of those arbitrarily detained, forced labor and the imposition of draconian restrictions on freedom of religion or belief, freedom of expression and freedom of movement."

On January 19, 2021, incoming U.S. president Joe Biden'ssecretary of statenomineeAntony Blinkenwas asked during his confirmation hearings whether he agreed with Pompeo's conclusion that the CCP had committed genocide against the Uyghurs, he contended "That would be my judgment as well."During her confirmation hearings Joe Biden's nominee to be the US ambassador to the United NationsLinda Thomas-Greenfieldstated that she believed what was currently happening in Xin gian g was a genocide, adding "I lived through and experienced and witnessed agenocide in Rwanda."

The US designation was followed byCanada's House of Commonsand theDutch parliament,each passing anon-binding motionin February 2021 to recognize China's actions as genocide.

In January 2021, theUnited States Holocaust Memorial Museuminitially stated that, "[t]here is a reasonable basis to believe that the government of China is committing crimes against humanity."In November 2021, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum revised its stance to state that the "Chinese government may be committing genocide against the Uyghurs."

In February 2021, a report released by theEssex Court Chambersconcluded that "there is a very credible case that acts carried out by the Chinese government against the Uighur people in Xin gian g Uighur Autonomous Region amount to crimes against humanity and the crime of genocide, and describes how the minority group has been subject to" enslavement, torture, rape, enforced sterilisation and persecution. "" Victims have been "forced to remain instress positionsfor an extended period of time, beaten, deprived of food, shackled and blindfolded ", it said. The legal team stated that they had seen" prolific credible evidence "of sterilisation procedures carried out on women, including forced abortions, saying the human rights abuses" clearly constitute a form of genocidal conduct ".

On February 13, 2021,The Economistwrote that while China's treatment and persecution of Uyghurs is "horrific" and acrime against humanity,"genocide" is the wrong word for China's actions due to China not engaging in mass murder.

According to a March 2021Newlines Institutereport that was written by over 50 global China, genocide, and international law experts,the Chinese government breached every article in theGenocide Convention,writing, "China's long-established, publicly and repeatedly declared, specifically targeted, systematically implemented, and fully resourced policy and practice toward the Uyghur group is inseparable from 'the intent to destroy in whole or in part' the Uyghur group as such."The report cited credible reports of mass deaths under the mass internment drive, while Uighur leaders were selectively sentenced to death or sentenced to long-term imprisonment. "Uyghurs are suffering from systematic torture and cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment, including rape, sexual abuse, and public humiliation, both inside and outside the camps", the report stated. The report argued that these policies are directly orchestrated by the highest levels of state, including Xi and the top officials of the Chinese Communist Party in Xin gian g.It also reported that the Chinese government gave explicit orders to "eradicate tumours", "wipe them out completely", "destroy them root and branch", "round up everyone", and "show absolutely no mercy", in regards to Uyghurs,and that camp guards reportedly follow orders to uphold the system in place until "Kazakhs, Uyghurs, and other Muslim nationalities, would disappear...until all Muslim nationalities would be extinct".According to the report "Internment camps contain designated" interrogation rooms "where Uyghur detainees are subjected to consistent and brutal torture methods, including beatings with metal prods, electric shocks, and whips."

In June 2021, the Canadian Anthropology Society issued a statement on Xin gian g in which the organization stated, "expert testimony and witnessing, and irrefutable evidence from the Chinese Government's own satellite imagery, documents, and eyewitness reports, overwhelmingly confirms the scale of the genocide."

In June 2021,The New York TimesandProPublicapublished their analysis of over 3,000 videos, concluding that after the January 2021 U.S. declaration that China was committing genocide in Xin gian g, the Chinese government started an influence campaign featuring thousands of videos of Chinese citizens denying genocide and abuses in Xin gian g on Twitter and YouTube.In August 2022, the U.S. State Department published a reportPRC Efforts to Manipulate Global Public Opinion on Xin gian gon the Chinese government's global efforts "to discredit independent sources that report ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity" in Xin gian g.

A 2023 academic book by political theorists Alain Brossat and Juan Alberto Ruiz Casado labeled the accusation of genocide as unsubstantiated.They described the information used to apply the label as misleading and coming "exclusively from a few sources, for the most part overwhelmingly and openly partisan in their anti-China crusade"; they especially criticize Adrian Zenz's 2018 detainee study and 2019 sterilization study as "academically flimsy" and containing misleading or directly false claims, respectively.

Academics Steve Tsang and Olivia Cheung write that their research has found no evidence that Xi Jinping advocates genocide against Uyghurs.Tsang and Cheung conclude that China's policies subordinate identity based on culture, religion, or minority language in an effort to establish a national identity based on Han heritage, language, and Xi Jinping Thought.

See also

Main article:Outline of genocide studies

• Allegations of genocide in Donbas
• Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russo-Ukrainian War
• Anti-communist mass killings
• Armenian genocide denial,a form ofgenocide denial
• The Black Book of Communism
• Black genocide in the United States– the belief thatAfrican Americanshave been subjected to genocide because ofracism against them,an aspect ofracism in the United States
• Crimes against humanity under communist regimes
• Criticism of communist party rule
• Denial of genocides of Indigenous peoples,another form of genocide denial
• Genocide of indigenous peoples
• Genocides in history
• Historical negationism
• Historical revisionism
• Holocaust studies,a form ofgenocide studies
• Holocaust trivialization
• List of ethnic cleansing campaigns
• List of genocides
• List of war crimes
• Mass killings under communist regimes
• Native American genocide in the United States– the belief thatNative Americanshave been subjected to genocide because ofracism against them,another aspect of racism in the United States
• Rohingya genocide case

References

Bibliography

• Adhikari, Mohamed(25 July 2022).Destroying to Replace: Settler Genocides of Indigenous Peoples.Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.ISBN978-1647920548.
• Allworth, Edward (1998).The Tatars of Crimea: Return to the Homeland: Studies and Documents.Durham: Duke University Press.ISBN9780822319948.LCCN97019110.OCLC610947243.
• Ascherson, Neal(1999).The King Incorporated: Leopold the Second and the Congo(New ed.). London: Granta.ISBN1-86207-290-6.
• Atto, Naures (2016). "What Could Not Be Written: A Study of the Oral Transmission of Sayfo Genocide Memory Among Assyrians".Genocide Studies International.10(2): 183–209.doi:10.3138/gsi.10.2.04.
• Bennigsen, Alexandre;Broxup, Marie(1983).The Islamic threat to the Soviet State.London: Taylor & Francis.ISBN9781317831716.LCCN82016826.
• Besemeres, John (2016).A Difficult Neighbourhood: Essays on Russia and East-Central Europe since World War II.Canberra: ANU Press.ISBN9781760460617.
• Biner, Zerrin Özlem (2011). "Multiple imaginations of the state: understanding a mobile conflict about justice and accountability from the perspective of Assyrian–Syriac communities".Citizenship Studies.15(3–4): 367–379.doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.564789.
• Blank, Stephen (2015)."A Double Dispossession: The Crimean Tatars After Russia's Ukrainian War".Genocide Studies and Prevention.9(1): 18–32.doi:10.5038/1911-9933.9.1.1271.
• Boyce, James(2010).Van Diemen's Land.Melbourne: Black Inc.ISBN978-1-86395-491-4.
• Broome, Richard (2019).Aboriginal Australians: a history since 1788(5th ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.ISBN9781760528218.
• Bryan, Fanny E. (1984). "Anti-religious activity in the Chechen-Ingush republic of the USSR and the survival of Islam".Central Asian Survey.3(2): 99–115.doi:10.1080/02634938408400466.
• Chang, Jon K. (2019). "Ethnic Cleansing and Revisionist Russian and Soviet History".Academic Questions.32(2): 270.doi:10.1007/s12129-019-09791-8(inactive 19 April 2024).S2CID150711796.{{cite journal}}:CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 (link)
• Clements, Nicholas (2013).Frontier Conflict in Van Diemen's Land (PhD thesis)(PDF)(Thesis).University of Tasmania.
• Clements, Nicholas (2014).The Black War.Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.ISBN978-0-70225-006-4.
• Cornell, Svante (2001). "Cooperation and Conflict in the North Caucasus". In Aybak, Tunc (ed.).Politics of the Black Sea: Dynamics of Cooperation and Conflict.I.B. Tauris. p. 241.ISBN9781860644542.LCCN1860644546.
• Courtois, Stephane(2010). "Raphael Lemkin and the Question of Genocide under Communist Regimes". In Bieńczyk-Missala, Agnieszka; Dębski, Sławomir (eds.).Rafał Lemkin.PISM.pp. 121–122.ISBN9788389607850.LCCN2012380710.
• "Democratic Republic of the Congo".World Without Genocide.2012.Retrieved29 July2015.
• Drumond, Paula (2011). "Invisible Males: The Congolese Genocide". In Jones, Adam (ed.).New Directions in Genocide Research.Routledge.pp. 96–112.ISBN978-0-415-49597-4.
• "Early day motion 2251".Houses of Parliament.Retrieved29 December2015.
• Ewans, Martin (2017).European Atrocity, African Catastrophe: Leopold II, the Congo Free State and its Aftermath.Routledge.ISBN978-1317849070– viaGoogle Books.
• Fisher, Alan W. (2014).Crimean Tatars.Stanford, California: Hoover Press.ISBN9780817966638.LCCN76041085.OCLC946788279.
• Fredholm, Michael (2000). "The prospects for genocide in Chechnya and extremist retaliation against the West".Central Asian Survey.19(3): 315–327.doi:10.1080/026349300750057955.S2CID145806371.
• Gaunt, David(2013). "Failed Identity and the Assyrian Genocide".Shatterzone of Empires: Coexistence and Violence in the German, Habsburg, Russian, and Ottoman Borderlands(illustrated ed.).Indiana University Press.pp. 317–333.ISBN978-0-253-00631-8.
• Gaunt, David (2015)."The Complexity of the Assyrian Genocide".Genocide Studies International.9(1): 83–103.doi:10.3138/gsi.9.1.05.ISSN2291-1847.
• Gaunt, David; Atto, Naures; Barthoma, Soner O. (2017). "Introduction: Contextualizing the Sayfo in the First World War".Let Them Not Return: Sayfo – The Genocide Against the Assyrian, Syriac, and Chaldean Christians in the Ottoman Empire.Berghahn Books.pp. 1–32.ISBN978-1-78533-499-3.
• Gilbert, Martin(1989).Second World War.London: Guild Publishing.
• Goddeeris, Idesbald (2015). "Postcolonial Belgium: The Memory of the Congo".International Journal of Postcolonial Studies.17(3): 434–51.doi:10.1080/1369801X.2014.998253.S2CID163672254.
• Hochschild, Adam(1999).King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa(1st ed.). Boston:Houghton Mifflin.ISBN978-0-618-00190-3.
• Hochschild, Adam(6 October 2005)."In the Heart of Darkness".New York Review of Books.52(15).
• Hughes, Robert(1987).The Fatal Shore.London: Pan.ISBN0-330-29892-5.
• Joes, Anthony James (2010). "Guerrilla Warfare". In Fink, George (ed.).Stress of War, Conflict and Disaster.Academic Press.p.357.ISBN9780123813824.LCCN2010024875.
• Jones, Adam(2016).Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction(revised ed.).Routledge.p. 203.ISBN9781317533856– viaGoogle Books.
• Kamusella, Tomasz(2008).The Politics of Language and Nationalism in Modern Central Europe.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.ISBN9780230583474.OCLC943531746.
• Kieser, Hans-Lukas;Bloxham, Donald (2014). "Genocide".The Cambridge History of the First World War:Volume 1: Global War.Cambridge University Press.pp. 585–614.ISBN978-0-511-67566-9.
• Kleveman, Lutz(2002).Der Kampf um das Heilige Feuer: Wettlauf der Weltmächte am Kaspischen Meer[The Battle for the Sacred Fire: Race of the World Powers on the Caspian Sea] (in German).Rowohlt.p. 87.ISBN9783871344565– viaGoogle Books.
• Koinova, Maria (2019)."Diaspora coalition-building for genocide recognition: Armenians, Assyrians and Kurds"(PDF).Ethnic and Racial Studies.42(11): 1890–1910.doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1572908.Archived(PDF)from the original on 3 March 2022.Retrieved19 February2022.
• Κωστόπουλος, Τάσος (2007).Pólemos kai Ethnokátharsi: I xechasméni plevrá mias dekaetoús ethnikís exórmisisΠόλεμος και Εθνοκάθαρση: Η ξεχασμένη πλευρά μιας δεκαετούς εθνικής εξόρμησης (1912-1922)[War and Ethnic Cleansing: The Forgotten Side of a Ten-Year Ethnic Exploitation] (in Greek). Athens: Βιβλιόραμα.
• Kostópoulos, Tásos (2007).Pólemos kai Ethnokátharsi: I xechasméni plevrá mias dekaetoús ethnikís exórmisis (1912-1922)Πόλεμος και Εθνοκάθαρση: Η ξεχασμένη πλευρά μιας δεκαετούς εθνικής εξόρμησης (1912-1922)[War and Ethnic Cleansing: The Forgotten Side of a Ten-Year National Expedition (1912-1922)] (in Greek). Athens: Βιβλιόραμα.
• Lawson, Tom (2014).The Last Man.London:I.B. Tauris.ISBN978-1-78076-626-3.
• Legters, Lyman H. (1992)."The American Genocide".In Lyden, Fremont J. (ed.).Native Americans and Public Policy.Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.ISBN9780822976820.OCLC555693841.
• Madley, Benjamin (2004)."Patterns of frontier genocide 1803–1910: the aboriginal Tasmanians, the Yuki of California, and the Herero of Namibia".Journal of Genocide Research.6(2): 167–192.doi:10.1080/1462352042000225930.S2CID145079658.
• Margolis, Eric(2008).American Raj: Liberation or Domination?.Key Porter Books.p. 277.ISBN9781554700875.LCCN2008431610.
• Milton, Sybil (1992).Nazi Policies Toward Roma and Sinti, 1933–1945.Vol. 2. Gypsy Lore Society.ASINB0006RI6NA.Preview in ProQuest.
• Milton, Sybil (2009). "The Holocaust: The Gypsies". In Totten, Samuel; Parsons, William S. (eds.).Century of Genocide(3rd ed.). Routledge.
• Naimark, Norman(2010).Stalin's Genocides.Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press.ISBN9780691152387.LCCN2010019063.
• Nzongola-Ntalaja, Georges(2007).The Congo, From Leopold to Kabila: A People's History(3rd ed.). New York:Palgrave.ISBN978-1-84277-053-5.
• Özçelik, Sezai (2020)."The Russian Occupation of Crimea in 2014: The Second Sürgün (The Soviet Genocide) of the Crimean Tatars".TroyAcademy.5(1): 29–44.doi:10.31454/usb.721939.S2CID218783911.
• Reynolds, Henry(2001).An Indelible Stain?.Sydney:Penguin.ISBN978-0-67091-220-9.
• Ryan, Lyndall(2012).Tasmanian Aborigines.Sydney:Allen & Unwin.ISBN978-1-74237-068-2.
• Schaller, Dominik (2005)."Raphael Lemkin's view of European colonial rule in Africa: between condemnation and admiration"(PDF).Journal of Genocide Research.7(4): 538.doi:10.1080/14623520500349977.ISSN1469-9494.S2CID36915506.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 12 December 2019.Retrieved12 December2019.
• Simon, Thomas W. (2007).The Laws of Genocide: Prescriptions for a Just World.Greenwood Publishing Group.ISBN978-0275979454– viaGoogle Books.
• Sjöberg, Erik(2016).The Making of the Greek Genocide: Contested Memories of the Ottoman Greek Catastrophe.Berghahn Books.ISBN978-1-78533-326-2.
• Sousa, Ashley Riley (2004).""They will be hunted down like wild beasts and destroyed!": a comparative study of genocide in California and Tasmania ".Journal of Genocide Research.6(2): 193–209.doi:10.1080/1462352042000225949.S2CID109131060.
• Stapleton, Timothy J. (2017).A History of Genocide in Africa.ABC-CLIO.ISBN978-1440830525– viaGoogle Books.
• Statiev, Alexandar (2010). "Soviet ethnic deportations: intent versus outcome".Journal of Genocide Research.11(2–3): 243–264.doi:10.1080/14623520903118961.S2CID71905569.
• Talay, Shabo (2018). "Sayfo 1915: the Beginning of the End of Syriac Christianity in the Middle East".Sayfo 1915: An Anthology of Essays on the Genocide of Assyrians/Arameans during the First World War.Gorgias Press.pp. 1–20.ISBN978-1-4632-3996-1.
• Tatz, Colin;Higgins, Winton (2016).The Magnitude of Genocide.Santa Barbara, CA:ABC-CLIO.ISBN9781440831614.LCCN2015042289.OCLC930059149– viaGoogle Books.
• Ther, Philipp (2014).The Dark Side of Nation-States: Ethnic Cleansing in Modern Europe.Göttingen:Berghahn Books.p. 118.ISBN9781782383031.LCCN2011516970– viaGoogle Books.
• Tishkov, Valery(2004).Chechnya: Life in a War-Torn Society.Vol. 6. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. p. 33.ISBN9780520930209.LCCN2003017330.
• Uehling, Greta (2015)."Genocide's Aftermath: Neostalinism in Contemporary Crimea".Genocide Studies and Prevention.9(1): 3–17.doi:10.5038/1911-9933.9.1.1273.
• Van Reybrouck, David(2014).Congo: The Epic History of a People.London: Fourth Estate.ISBN978-0-00-756290-9.
• Vanthemsche, Guy (2012).Belgium and the Congo, 1885–1980.New York:Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-19421-1.
• Vellut, Jean-Luc (12 January 2006)."Response to 'In the Heart of Darkness'".New York Review of Books.53(1).
• Verbeeck, Georgi (2020)."Legacies of an imperial past in a small nation. Patterns of postcolonialism in Belgium".European Politics and Society.21(3): 292–306.doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.1645422.ISSN2374-5118.S2CID201454642.
• Weiner, Amir (2002). "Nothing but Certainty".Slavic Review.61(1): 44–53.doi:10.2307/2696980.JSTOR2696980.S2CID159548222.
• Weisbord, Robert (2003). "Response to 'The King, the Cardinal and the Pope: Leopold II's genocide in the Congo and the Vatican'".Journal of Genocide Research.5(1): 35–45.doi:10.1080/14623520305651.S2CID73371517.
• Werth, Nicholas (2008). "The Crimes of the Stalin Regime: Outline for an Inventory and Classification". In Stone, Dan (ed.).The Historiography of Genocide(repeated ed.). Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.p.412.ISBN9780230297784.LCCN2007048561.
• Williams, Brian Glyn(2015).Inferno in Chechnya: The Russian-Chechen Wars, the Al Qaeda Myth, and the Boston Marathon Bombings.University Press of New England.p. 47.ISBN9781611688016.LCCN2015002114– viaGoogle Books.
• Yacoub, Joseph(2016).Year of the Sword: The Assyrian Christian Genocide: A History.Hurst.ISBN978-0-19-063346-2.
• Yacoub, Joseph(2018). "Longtemps méconnu par la communauté internationale: le génocide assyro-chaldéen de 1915" [Long ignored by the international community: the Assyro-Chaldean genocide of 1915].Relations Internationales(in French).173(1): 45–64.doi:10.3917/ri.173.0045.

Further reading

Main article:Bibliography of genocide studies

• Beachler, D. (2011).The Genocide Debate: Politicians, Academics, and Victims.Springer.ISBN978-0-230-33763-3.
• Pruitt, W. R. (2017). Understanding genocide denial legislation: A comparative analysis.International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences,12(2), 270-284.