Jump to content

Grande Noirceur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TheGrande Noirceur(French pronunciation:[ɡʀɑ̃dnwaʀsœ:ʀ],English,Great Darkness) refers to the regime of conservative policies undertaken by the governing body ofQuebecPremierMaurice Le Noblet Duplessisfrom 1936 to 1939 and from 1944 to 1959.[1]

Rural areas[edit]

Duplessis favoured rural areas over city development and introduced various agricultural credits during his first term. He also was noted for meagre investment in social services. Duplessis also opposed military conscription andCanadian involvement in World War II.

Support from the Catholic Church[edit]

In 1936, Duplessis hung acrucifixin the Quebec legislature. It was replaced by a second crucifix in 1982, which was only removed on 10 July 2019.[2]

His party, theUnion Nationale,often had the active support of theRoman Catholic Churchduring political campaigns, using the sloganLe ciel est bleu; l'enfer est rouge( "Heaven is blue; hell is red"; red is the colour of theLiberal Party,and blue was the colour of theUnion Nationale).[3]

However, the 1950s labour strikes made many in the Church break with theUnion Nationaleand support the unions.

Anti-communism[edit]

Duplessis championedanti-communismand opposed trade unions such as theTrades and Labour Congress of Canada(TLC). He introduced several laws opposed by the unions, most notably thePadlock Law,which prohibited the dissemination of communist propaganda "by any means whatsoever."

Anti-unionism[edit]

In 1949, Duplessis also attempted to introduce a law modeled on the 1947 AmericanTaft-Hartley Actto eliminate certain[clarification needed]labour union rights established by the Labour Relations Law of 1944, which was Quebec's equivalent of the AmericanWagner Actof 1935. Duplessis's bill was withdrawn after fierce union opposition.

Duplessis later introduced a similar law in 1954, known as Bill 19, to force union groups to expel any communist supporter. Any group would lose its trade union accreditation if there was a single member with ties to communist organizations or who supported the ideology. The bill was so unpopular that it lost even the support of the conservative Catholic union group. That controversy forced the union to review its structure, which eventually led to the creation of theConfédération des syndicats nationaux(CSN).

Labour strikes[edit]

His time in office was marked by significant labour strikes, such as theDominion TextileinValleyfieldin 1946, theAsbestos StrikeinEstrie,and theMurdochvillecopper mine strike in 1957. In those conflicts, Duplessis responded rapidly with force by using the provincial police to disperse picket lines and restore order, with several arrests. However, the Murdochville strike led to a major victory for union rights and provided the impetus and inspiration for other labour leaders to emerge and energized calls for labour rights.[4]

Roncarelli v. Duplessis[edit]

Duplessis actively opposed theJehovah's Witnessesand once used his influence to revoke a liquor license owned by one of the religion's members. InRoncarelli v. Duplessis,that decision was overturned by theSupreme Court of Canada,and Duplessis was ordered to pay $33,123.53 in damages shortly before he died.

Patronage and corruption[edit]

Duplessis' government was characterized by patronage and corruption, wielded against the Liberal opposition. He once proclaimed that a much-needed bridge atTrois-Rivièreswould not be built if a Liberal member was elected, and he kept his word while the opposition held the seat. In a rural district that had always elected a Liberal, the roads were kept unpaved, which obstructed commerce and so its residents decided in 1956 to vote for theUnion Nationaleas that was the only way to get their district noticed.

Duplessis was also accused of voter fraud. Contemporary rumours say thatUnion Nationalegroups would arrive in rural towns armed with whiskey, food, and appliances in exchange for votes.

Jewish refugees[edit]

Another reason Duplessis won the1944 Quebec general electionwas by appealing to anti-Semitic prejudices in Quebec by making the false claim in a violently anti-Semitic speech that the Dominion government together with the Godbout government had made a secret deal with the "International Zionist Brotherhood" to settle 100,000 Jewish refugees left homeless by the Holocaust in Quebec after the war in exchange for Jewish campaign contributions to both the federal and provincial Liberal parties.[5]

By contrast, Duplessis claimed that he was not taking any money from the Jews, and if he were elected Premier, he would stop this plan to bring Jewish refugees to Quebec. To further push on the message, theUnion Nationalehanded out campaign pamphlets warning about the alleged plan to bring 100,000 Jewish refugees to Quebec, which featured a cartoon of the standard stereotype of an evil-looking, hook-nosed Jew handing bags of money to Godbout while in the background a vast horde of dirty, disreputable-looking, hook-nosed Jewish refugees were ready to descend onla belle province.[6]

Though Duplessis's story about the plan to settle 100,000 Jewish refugees in Quebec was entirely false, his story was widely believed in Quebec, and ensured he won the election.[7]Duplessis's biographerConrad Blackargued that Duplessis was in no way personally anti-Semitic, but chose to appeal to the antisemitism of the majority of Quebecois at the time to win the 1944 election.[8]

Provincial autonomy and nationalism[edit]

On January 21, 1948, Duplessis made one of his most enduring contributions with the adoption of an officialflag of Quebec,theFleurdelisé,which replaced the BritishUnion Flagatop theQuebec Parliament Building.

References[edit]

  1. ^Meunier, E.-Martin (2016)."La Grande Noirceur canadienne-française dans l'historiographie et la mémoire québécoises: Revisiter une interprétation convenue".Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire(129): 43–59.doi:10.3917/ving.129.0043.ISSN0294-1759.JSTOR24674690.
  2. ^Crête, Mylène (2019-07-10)."Le crucifix a été retiré de l'Assemblée nationale"[The crucifix has been removed from the National Assembly].Le Devoir(in French).Retrieved2021-02-28.
  3. ^Bernier Arcand, Philippe (2018)."Bleu, histoire d'une couleur politique".Histoire Québec(in French).23(4): 15–17.ISSN1201-4710.
  4. ^Bob Carty."No Company Town: The Story of Murdochville".Archived fromthe originalon May 11, 2008.
  5. ^Knowles, ValerieStrangers at Our Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, 1540-2006,Toronto: Dundun Press, 2007 page 149.
  6. ^Abella, Irving & Troper, HaroldNone is too many: Canada and the Jews of Europe, 1933-1948,Toronto: L & O Denny, 1986 page 162.
  7. ^Knowles, ValerieStrangers at Our Gates: Canadian Immigration and Immigration Policy, 1540-2006,Toronto: Dundun Press, 2007 page 149.
  8. ^Black, ConradDuplesisis,Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1977 page 719