Hill sphere

For the inner part of the Oort cloud, seeHills cloud.

In sectional/side view, a two-dimensional representation of the three-dimensional concept of the Hill sphere, here showing the Earth's "gravity well" (gravitational potential of Earth, blue line), the same for the Moon (red line) and their combined potential (black thick line). Point P is the force free spot, where gravitational forces of Earth and Moon cancel. The sizes of Earth and Moon are in the proportion, but distances and energies are not to scale.

TheHill sphereis a common model for the calculation of agravitational sphere of influence.It is the most commonly used model to calculate the spatial extent of gravitational influence of anastronomical body(m) in which it dominates over the gravitational influence of other bodies, particularly aprimary(M).It is sometimes confused with other models of gravitational influence, such as theLaplace sphereor being called theRoche sphere,the latter causing confusion with theRoche limit.It was defined by theAmericanastronomerGeorge William Hill,based on the work of theFrenchastronomerÉdouard Roche.

To be retained by a more gravitationally attracting astrophysical object—a planet by a more massive star, amoonby a more massive planet—the less massive body must have anorbitthat lies within the gravitational potential represented by the more massive body's Hill sphere.That moon would, in turn, have a Hill sphere of its own, and any object within that distance would tend to become a satellite of the moon, rather than of the planet itself.

A contour plot of the effective gravitational potential of a two-body system, here, the Sun and Earth, indicating the fiveLagrange points.

One simple view of the extent of theSolar Systemis that it is bounded by the Hill sphere of theSun(engendered by the Sun's interaction with thegalactic nucleusor other more massive stars).A more complex example is the one at right, the Earth's Hill sphere, which extends between theLagrange pointsL₁andL₂,which lie along the line of centers of the Earth and the more massive Sun.The gravitational influence of the less massive body is least in that direction, and so it acts as the limiting factor for the size of the Hill sphere;beyond that distance, a third object in orbit around the Earth would spend at least part of its orbit outside the Hill sphere, and would be progressively perturbed by the tidal forces of the more massive body, the Sun, eventually ending up orbiting the latter.

For two massive bodies with gravitational potentials and any given energy of a third object of negligible mass interacting with them, one can define azero-velocity surfacein space which cannot be passed, the contour of theJacobi integral.When the object's energy is low, the zero-velocity surface completely surrounds the less massive body (of thisrestricted three-body system), which means the third object cannot escape; at higher energy, there will be one or more gaps or bottlenecks by which the third object may escape the less massive body and go into orbit around the more massive one.If the energy is at the border between these two cases, then the third object cannot escape, but the zero-velocity surface confining it touches a larger zero-velocity surface around the less massive bodyat one of the nearby Lagrange points, forming a cone-like point there.At the opposite side of the less massive body, the zero-velocity surface gets close to the other Lagrange point.This limiting zero-velocity surface around the less massive body is its Hill "sphere".

Definition

The Hill radius or sphere (the latter defined by the former radius) has been described as "the region around a planetary body where its own gravity (compared to that of the Sun or other nearby bodies) is the dominant force in attracting satellites," both natural and artificial.

As described by de Pater and Lissauer, all bodies within a system such as the Sun'sSolar System"feel the gravitational force of one another", and while the motions of just two gravitationally interacting bodies—constituting a "two-body problem" —are "completely integrable ([meaning]...there exists one independent integral or constraint per degree of freedom)" and thus an exact, analytic solution, the interactions ofthree(or more) such bodies "cannot be deduced analytically", requiring instead solutions by numerical integration, when possible.This is the case, unless the negligible mass of one of the three bodies allows approximation of the system as a two-body problem, known formally as a "restricted three-body problem".

For such two- or restricted three-body problems as its simplest examples—e.g., one more massive primary astrophysical body, mass of m1, and a less massive secondary body, mass of m2—the concept of a Hill radius or sphere is of the approximate limit to the secondary mass's "gravitational dominance",a limit defined by "the extent" of its Hill sphere, which is represented mathematically as follows:

$R_{\mathrm {H} }\approx a{\sqrt[{3}]{\frac {m_{2}}{3(m_{1}+m_{2})}}}$,

where, in this representation, major axis "a" can be understood as the "instantaneous heliocentric distance" between the two masses (elsewhere abbreviatedrp).

More generally, if the less massive body,$m2$,orbits a more massive body (m1, e.g., as a planet orbiting around the Sun) and has asemi-major axis$a$,and aneccentricityof$e$,then the Hill radius or sphere,$R_{\mathrm {H} }$of the less massive body, calculated at thepericenter,is approximately:

$R_{\mathrm {H} }\approx a(1-e){\sqrt[{3}]{\frac {m_{2}}{3(m_{1}+m_{2})}}}.$

When eccentricity is negligible (the most favourable case for orbital stability), this expression reduces to the one presented above.

Example and derivation

A schematic, not-to-scale representation of Hill spheres (as 2D radii) andRoche limitsof each body of the Sun-Earth-Moon system. The actual Hill radius for the Earth-Moon pair is on the order of 60,000 km (i.e., extending less than one-sixth the distance of the 378,000 km between the Moon and the Earth).

In the Earth-Sun example, the Earth (5.97×10²⁴kg) orbits the Sun (1.99×10³⁰kg) at a distance of 149.6 million km, or oneastronomical unit(AU). The Hill sphere for Earth thus extends out to about 1.5 million km (0.01 AU). The Moon's orbit, at a distance of 0.384 million km from Earth, is comfortably within the gravitationalsphere of influenceof Earth and it is therefore not at risk of being pulled into an independent orbit around the Sun.

The earlier eccentricity-ignoring formula can be re-stated as follows:

${\frac {R_{\mathrm {H} }^{3}}{a^{3}}}\approx 1/3{\frac {m2}{M}}$,or$3{\frac {R_{\mathrm {H} }^{3}}{a^{3}}}\approx {\frac {m2}{M}}$,

where M is the sum of the interacting masses.

Derivation

The expression for the Hill radius can be found by equating gravitational and centrifugal forces acting on a test particle (of mass much smaller than$m$) orbiting the secondary body. Assume that the distance between masses$M$and$m$is$r$,and that the test particle is orbiting at a distance$r_{\mathrm {H} }$from the secondary. When the test particle is on the line connecting the primary and the secondary body, the force balance requires that

${\frac {Gm}{r_{\mathrm {H} }^{2}}}-{\frac {GM}{(r-r_{\mathrm {H} })^{2}}}+\Omega ^{2}(r-r_{\mathrm {H} })=0,$

where$G$is the gravitational constant and$\Omega ={\sqrt {\frac {GM}{r^{3}}}}$is the (Keplerian) angular velocity of the secondary about the primary (assuming that$m\ll M$). The above equation can also be written as

${\frac {m}{r_{\mathrm {H} }^{2}}}-{\frac {M}{r^{2}}}\left(1-{\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\right)^{-2}+{\frac {M}{r^{2}}}\left(1-{\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\right)=0,$

which, through a binomial expansion to leading order in$r_{\mathrm {H} }/r$,can be written as

${\frac {m}{r_{\mathrm {H} }^{2}}}-{\frac {M}{r^{2}}}\left(1+2{\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\right)+{\frac {M}{r^{2}}}\left(1-{\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\right)={\frac {m}{r_{\mathrm {H} }^{2}}}-{\frac {M}{r^{2}}}\left(3{\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\right)\approx 0.$

Hence, the relation stated above

${\frac {r_{\mathrm {H} }}{r}}\approx {\sqrt[{3}]{\frac {m}{3M}}}.$

If the orbit of the secondary about the primary is elliptical, the Hill radius is maximum at theapocenter,where$r$is largest, and minimum at the pericenter of the orbit. Therefore, for purposes of stability of test particles (for example, of small satellites), the Hill radius at the pericenter distance needs to be considered.

To leading order in$r_{\mathrm {H} }/r$,the Hill radius above also represents the distance of the Lagrangian point L₁from the secondary.

Regions of stability

The Hill sphere is only an approximation, and other forces (such asradiation pressureor theYarkovsky effect) can eventually perturb an object out of the sphere.As stated, the satellite (third mass) should be small enough that its gravity contributes negligibly.

Detailed numerical calculations show that orbits at or just within the Hill sphere are not stable in the long term; it appears that stable satellite orbits exist only inside 1/2 to 1/3 of the Hill radius.

The region of stability forretrograde orbitsat a large distance from the primary is larger than the region forprograde orbitsat a large distance from the primary. This was thought to explain the preponderance of retrograde moons around Jupiter; however, Saturn has a more even mix of retrograde/prograde moons so the reasons are more complicated.

Further examples

It is possible for a Hill sphere to be so small that it is impossible to maintain an orbit around a body. For example, an astronaut could not have orbited the 104tonSpace Shuttleat an orbit 300 km above the Earth, because a 104-ton object at that altitude has a Hill sphere of only 120 cm in radius, much smaller than a Space Shuttle. A sphere of this size and mass would be denser thanlead,and indeed, inlow Earth orbit,a spherical body must be more dense than lead in order to fit inside its own Hill sphere, or else it will be incapable of supporting an orbit. Satellites further out ingeostationary orbit,however, would only need to be more than 6% of the density of water to fit inside their own Hill sphere.

Within theSolar System,the planet with the largest Hill radius isNeptune,with 116 million km, or 0.775 au; its great distance from the Sun amply compensates for its small mass relative to Jupiter (whose own Hill radius measures 53 million km). Anasteroidfrom theasteroid beltwill have a Hill sphere that can reach 220,000 km (for1 Ceres), diminishing rapidly with decreasing mass. The Hill sphere of66391 Moshup,aMercury-crossing asteroidthat has a moon (named Squannit), measures 22 km in radius.

A typicalextrasolar"hot Jupiter",HD 209458 b,has a Hill sphere radius of 593,000 km, about eight times its physical radius of approx 71,000 km. Even the smallest close-in extrasolar planet,CoRoT-7b,still has a Hill sphere radius (61,000 km), six times its physical radius (approx 10,000 km). Therefore, these planets could have small moons close in, although not within their respectiveRoche limits.

Hill spheres for the solar system

The following table and logarithmic plot show the radius of the Hill spheres of some bodies of the Solar System calculated with the first formula stated above (including orbital eccentricity), using values obtained from theJPL DE405 ephemerisand from the NASA Solar System Exploration website.

Radius of the Hill spheres of some bodies of the Solar System

Body	Million km	au	Body radii	Arcminutes	Farthest moon (au)
Mercury	0.1753	0.0012	71.9	10.7	—
Venus	1.0042	0.0067	165.9	31.8	—
Earth	1.4714	0.0098	230.7	33.7	0.00257
Mars	0.9827	0.0066	289.3	14.9	0.00016
Jupiter	50.5736	0.3381	707.4	223.2	0.1662
Saturn	61.6340	0.4120	1022.7	147.8	0.1785
Uranus	66.7831	0.4464	2613.1	80.0	0.1366
Neptune	115.0307	0.7689	4644.6	87.9	0.3360
Ceres	0.2048	0.0014	433.0	1.7	—
Pluto	5.9921	0.0401	5048.1	3.5	0.00043
Eris	8.1176	0.0543	6979.9	2.7	0.00025

Logarithmic plot of the Hill radii (in km) for the bodies of the solar system

See also

• Interplanetary Transport Network
• n-body problem
• Roche lobe
• Sphere of influence (astrodynamics)
• Sphere of influence (black hole)

Further reading

• de Pater, Imke & Lissauer, Jack (2015). "Dynamics (The Three-Body Problem, Perturbations and Resonances)".Planetary Sciences(2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 28–30, 34.ISBN9781316195697.Retrieved22 July2023.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• de Pater, Imke & Lissauer, Jack (2015). "Planet Formation (Formation of the Giant Planets, Satellites of Planets and Minor Planets)".Planetary Sciences(2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 539, 544.ISBN9781316195697.Retrieved22 July2023.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Gurzadyan, Grigor A. (2020). "The Sphere of Attraction, the Sphere of Action and Hill's Sphere".Theory of Interplanetary Flights.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 258–263.ISBN9781000116717.Retrieved22 July2023.
• Gurzadyan, Grigor A. (2020). "The Roche Limit".Theory of Interplanetary Flights.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 263f.ISBN9781000116717.Retrieved22 July2023.
• Ida, S.; Kokubo, E. & Takeda, T. (2012). "N-Body Simulations of Moon Accretion". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.).Collisional Processes in the Solar System.Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 206, 209f.ISBN9789401007122.Retrieved22 July2023.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Ip, W.-H. & Fernandez, J.A. (2012). "Accretional Origin of the Giant Planers and its Consequences". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.).Collisional Processes in the Solar System.Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 173f.ISBN9789401007122.Retrieved22 July2023.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
• Asher, D.J.; Bailey, M.E. & Steel (2012). "The Role of Non-Gravitational Forces in Decoupling Orbits from Jupiter". In Marov, Mikhail Ya. & Rickman, Hans (ed.).Collisional Processes in the Solar System.Astrophysics and Space Science Library. Vol. 261. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 122.ISBN9789401007122.Retrieved22 July2023.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links

• Can an Astronaut Orbit the Space Shuttle?
• The moon that went up a hill, but came down a planetArchived2008-09-30 at theWayback Machine