Jump to content

Hunt process

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inprobability theory,aHunt processis a type ofMarkov process,named for mathematicianGilbert A. Huntwho first defined them in 1957. Hunt processes were important in the study of probabilisticpotential theoryuntil they were superseded byright processesin the 1970s.

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]

In the 1930-50s the work of mathematicians such asJoseph Doob,William Feller,Mark Kac,andShizuo Kakutanideveloped connections between Markov processes andpotential theory.[1]

In 1957-8Gilbert A. Huntpublished a triplet of papers[2][3][4]which deepened that connection. The impact of these papers on the probabilist community of the time was significant. Joseph Doob said that "Hunt’s great papers on the potential theory generated by Markov transition functions revolutionized potential theory."[5] Ronald Getoordescribed them as "a monumental work of nearly 170 pages that contained an enormous amount of truly original mathematics."[6] Gustave Choquetwrote that Hunt's papers were "fundamental memoirs which were renewing at the same time potential theory and the theory of Markov processes by establishing a precise link, in a very general framework, between an important class of Markov processes and the class of kernels in potential theory which French probabilists had just been studying."[7]

One of Hunt's contributions was to group together several properties that a Markov process should have in order to be studied via potential theory, which he called "hypothesis (A)". A stochastic processsatisfies hypothesis (A) if the following three assumptions hold:[2]

First assumption:is a Markov process on aPolish spacewithcàdlàgpaths.
Second assumption:satisfies thestrong Markov property.
Third assumption:is quasi-left continuous on.

Processes satisfying hypothesis (A) soon became known as Hunt processes. If the third assumption is slightly weakened so that quasi-left continuity holds only on the lifetime of,thenis called a "standard process", a term that was introduced byEugene Dynkin.[8][9]

Rise and fall

[edit]

The book "Markov Processes and Potential Theory"[10](1968) byBlumenthaland Getoor codified standard and Hunt processes as the archetypal Markov processes.[11]Over the next few years probabilistic potential theory was concerned almost exclusively with these processes.

Of the three assumptions contained in Hunt's hypothesis (A), the most restrictive is quasi-left continuity. Getoor andGloverwrite: "In proving many of his results, Hunt assumed certain additional regularity hypotheses about his processes.... It slowly became clear that it was necessary to remove many of these regularity hypotheses in order to advance the theory."[12]Already in the 1960s attempts were being made to assume quasi-left continuity only when necessary.[13]

In 1970, Chung-Tuo Shih extended two of Hunt's fundamental results,[a]completely removing the need for left limits (and thus also quasi-left continuity).[14]This led to the definition ofright processesas the new class of Markov processes for which potential theory could work.[15] Already in 1975, Getoor wrote that Hunt processes were "mainly of historical interest".[16] By the time that Michael Sharpe published his book "General Theory of Markov Processes" in 1988, Hunt and standard processes were considered obsolete in probabilistic potential theory.[15]

Hunt processes are still studied by mathematicians, most often in relation toDirichlet forms.[17][18][19]

Definition

[edit]

Brief definition

[edit]

A Hunt processis a strong Markov process on aPolish spacethat iscàdlàgand quasi-left continuous; that is, ifis an increasing sequence ofstopping timeswith limit,then

Verbose definition

[edit]

Letbe aRadon spaceandthe-algebra of universally measurable subsets of,and letbe a Markov semigroup onthat preserves. A Hunt process is a collectionsatisfying the following conditions:[20]

(i)is afilteredmeasurable space,and eachis aprobability measureon.
(ii) For every,is an-valued stochastic process on,and is adapted to.
(iii)(normality)For every,.
(iv)(Markov property)For every,and for all,.
(v)is a collection of mapssuch that for each,and
(vi)isaugmentedandright continuous.
(vii)(right-continuity)For every,every,and every-excessive (with respect to) function,the mapis almost surely right continuous under.
(viii)(quasi-left continuity)For every,ifis an increasing sequence of stopping times with limit,then.

Sharpe[20]shows in Lemma 2.6 that conditions (i)-(v) imply measurability of the mapfor all,and in Theorem 7.4 that (vi)-(vii) imply the strong Markov property with respect to.

Connection to other Markov processes

[edit]

The following inclusions hold among various classes of Markov process:[21][22]

{Lévy} {Itô} {Feller} {Hunt} {special standard} {standard} {right} {strong Markov}

Time-changed Itô processes

[edit]

In 1980 Çinlar et al.[23] proved that anyreal-valuedHunt process issemimartingaleif and only if it is a random time-change of an Itô process. More precisely,[24] a Hunt processon(equipped with theBorel-algebra) is a semimartingale if and only if there is an Itô processand ameasurable functionwithsuch that,where Itô processes were first named due to their role in this theorem,[25] thoughItôhad previously studied them.[26]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^These are Propositions 2.1 and 2.2 of "Markoff Processes and Potentials I". Blumenthal and Getoor had previously extended these from Hunt processes to standard processes in Theorem III.6.1 of their 1968 book.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Blumenthal, Getoor (1968), vii
  2. ^abHunt, G.A.(1957). "Markoff Processes and Potentials I.".Illinois J. Math.1:44–93.
  3. ^Hunt, G.A.(1957). "Markoff Processes and Potentials II".Illinois J. Math.1:313–369.
  4. ^Hunt, G.A.(1958). "Markoff Processes and Potentials III".Illinois J. Math.2:151–213.
  5. ^Snell, J. Laurie(1997)."A Conversation with Joe Doob".Statistical Science.12(4): 301–311.doi:10.1214/ss/1030037961.
  6. ^Getoor, Ronald(1980)."Review:Probabilities and potential,by C. Dellacherie and P. A. Meyer ".Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.).2(3): 510–514.doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-1980-14787-4.
  7. ^As quoted byMarc YorinYor, Marc (2006)."The Life and Scientific Work of Paul André Meyer (August 21st, 1934 - January 30th, 2003)" Un modèle pour nous tous "".Memoriam Paul-André Meyer.Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 1874.doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35513-7_2.
  8. ^Blumenthal, Getoor (1968), 296
  9. ^Dynkin, E.B. (1960)."Transformations of Markov Processes Connected with Additive Functionals"(PDF).Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Prob.4(2): 117–142.
  10. ^Blumenthal, Robert K.;Getoor, Ronald K.(1968).Markov Processes and Potential Theory.New York: Academic Press.
  11. ^"Ever since the publication of the book by Blumenthal and Getoor, standard processes have been the central class of Markov processes in probabilistic potential theory", p277, Chung, Kai Lai;Walsh, John B. (2005).Markov Processes, Brownian Motion, and Time Symmetry.Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. New York, NY: Springer.doi:10.1007/0-387-28696-9.ISBN978-0-387-22026-0.
  12. ^Getoor, R.K.;Glover, J.(September 1984). "Riesz decompositions in Markov process theory".Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.285(1): 107–132.
  13. ^Chung, K.L.;Walsh, John B. (1969), "To reverse a Markov process",Acta Mathematica,123:225–251,doi:10.1007/BF02392389
  14. ^Shih, Chung-Tuo (1970)."On extending potential theory to all strong Markov processes".Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble).20(1): 303–415.doi:10.5802/aif.343.
  15. ^abMeyer, Paul André(1989)."Review:" General theory of Markov processes "by Michael Sharpe".Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.).20(21): 292–296.doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1989-15833-3.
  16. ^p56, Getoor, Ronald K.(1975).Markov Processes: Ray Processes and Knight Processes.Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.ISBN978-3-540-07140-2.
  17. ^Fukushima, Masatoshi; Oshima, Yoichi; Takeda, Masayoshi (1994).Dirichlet Forms and Symmetric Markov Processes.De Gruyter.doi:10.1515/9783110889741.
  18. ^Applebaum, David (2009),Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus,Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, p. 196,ISBN9780521738651
  19. ^Krupka, Demeter (2000),Introduction to Global Variational Geometry,North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 23, Elsevier, pp. 87ff,ISBN9780080954295
  20. ^abSharpe, Michael (1988).General Theory of Markov Processes.Academic Press, San Diego.ISBN0-12-639060-6.
  21. ^p55, Getoor, Ronald K.(1975).Markov Processes: Ray Processes and Knight Processes.Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.ISBN978-3-540-07140-2.
  22. ^p515, Çinlar, Erhan(2011).Probability and Stochastics.Graduate Texts in Mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.ISBN978-0-387-87858-4.
  23. ^ Çinlar, E.;Jacod, J.;Protter, P.; Sharpe, M.J. (1980)."Semimartingales and Markov processes".Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete.54(2): 161–219.doi:10.1007/BF00531446.
  24. ^Theorem 3.35,Çinlar, E.;Jacod, J.(1981)."Representation of Semimartingale Markov Processes in Terms of Wiener Processes and Poisson Random Measures".Seminar on Stochastic Processes, 1981.pp. 159–242.doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3938-3_8.
  25. ^ p164-5, "Thus, the processes whose extended generators have the form (1.1) are of central importance among semimartingale Markov processes, and deserve a name of their own. We call them Itô processes."Çinlar, E.;Jacod, J.;Protter, P.; Sharpe, M.J. (1980)."Semimartingales and Markov processes".Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete.54(2): 161–219.doi:10.1007/BF00531446.
  26. ^ Itô, Kiyosi(1951).On stochastic differential equations.Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. American Mathematical Society.doi:10.1090/memo/0004.ISBN978-0-8218-1204-4.

Sources

[edit]
  • Blumenthal, Robert M. and Getoor, Ronald K. "Markov Processes and Potential Theory". Academic Press, New York, 1968.
  • Hunt, G. A. "Markoff Processes and Potentials. I, II, III.", Illinois J. Math.1(1957) 44–93;1(1957), 313–369;2(1958), 151–213.