Imperial Count

Imperial Count(German:Reichsgraf) was a title in theHoly Roman Empire.During the medieval era, it was used exclusively to designate the holder of animperial county,that is, afiefheld directly (immediately) from the emperor, rather than from a prince who was a vassal of the emperor or of another sovereign, such as adukeorprince-elector.^[1]These imperial counts sat on one of the four "benches" ofCounts,whereat each exercised a fractional vote in theImperial Dietuntil 1806. Imperial counts rank above counts elevated by lesser sovereigns.

In the post–Middle Ages era, anyone granted the title ofCountby the emperor in his specific capacity as ruler of the Holy Roman Empire (rather than, e.g. as ruler ofAustria,Bohemia,Hungary,theSpanish Netherlands,etc.) became,ipso facto,an "Imperial Count" (Reichsgraf), whether he reigned over an immediate county or not.

Origins

In theMerovingianandFranconian Empire,aGraf( "Count" ) was an official who exercised the royal prerogatives in an administrative district (Gauor "county" ).^[1]A lord designated to represent the king or emperor in a county requiring higher authority than delegated to the typical count acquired a title which indicated that distinction: aborder landwas held by amargrave,a fortress by aburgrave,animperial palaceor royal estate by acount palatine,a large territory by alandgrave.^[1]Originally the counts wereministeriales,appointed administrators, but under theOttonianemperors, they came to constitute a class, whose land management on behalf of the ruling princes favoured their evolution to a status above not only peasants and burghers, but above landless knights and the landed gentry. Their roles within thefeudal systemtended to become hereditary and were gradually integrated with those of the ruling nobility by the close of the medieval era.

The possessor of a county within or subject to the Holy Roman Empire might owefeudalallegiance to anothernoble,theoretically of any rank, who might himself be avassalof another lord or of theHoly Roman Emperor;or the count might have no othersuzerainthan theHoly Roman Emperorhimself, in which case he was deemed to hold directly or "immediately" (reichsunmittelbar) of the emperor.^[1]Nobles who inherited, purchased, were granted or successfully seized such counties, or were able to eliminate any obligation of vassalage to an intermediate suzerain (for instance, by the purchase of his feudal rights from aliege lord), were those on whom the emperor came to rely directly to raise and supply the revenues and soldiers, from their own vassals and manors, which enabled him to govern and protect the empire. Thus theirImperial immediacytended to secure for them substantial independence within their own territories from the emperor's authority. Gradually they came also to be recognised as counselors entitled to be summoned to hisImperial Diets.

A parallel process occurred among other authorities and strata in the realm, both secular and ecclesiastical. While commoners and the lowest levels of nobles remained subject to the authority of a lord, baron or count, some knights and lords (Reichsfreiherren) avoided owing fealty to any but the emperor yet lacked sufficient importance to obtain consistent admission to the Diet. The most powerful nobles and bishops (Electors) secured the exclusive privilege of voting to choose a Holy Roman Emperor, from among their own number or other rulers, whenever a vacancy occurred.^[1]Those just below them in status were recognised asImperial princes(Reichsfürsten) who, through the hereditary vote each wielded in the Diet'sCollege of Princes,served as members of a loose legislature (cf.peerage) of the Empire.^[1]

Power and political role

As the Empire emerged from themedievalera, immediate counts were definitively excluded from possessing the individual seat and vote (Virilstimme) in the Diet that belonged to electors and princes. In order, however, to further their political interests more effectively and to preserve their independence, the imperial counts organized regional associations and heldGrafentage( "countly councils" ). In the Imperial Diet, starting in the 16th century, and consistently from thePerpetual Diet(1663–1806), the imperial counts were grouped into "imperialcomitalassociations "known asGrafenbänke.Early in the 16th century, such associations were formed inWetterauandSwabia.TheFranconianassociation was created in 1640, theWestphalianassociation in 1653.

They participated with the emperor, electors and princes in ruling the Empire by virtue of being entitled to a seat on one of the Counts' benches (Grafenbank) in the Diet. Each "bench" was entitled to exercise one collective vote (Kuriatstimme) in the Diet and each comital family was allowed to cast one fractional vote toward a bench's vote: A majority of fractional votes determined how that bench's vote would be cast on any issue before the Diet. Four benches were recognised (membership in each being determined by which quadrant of the Empire a count's fief lay within). By being seated and allowed to cast a shared vote on a Count's bench an imperial count obtained, the "seat and vote" within the Imperial Diet which, combined withImperial immediacy,made of his chief land holding anImperial estate(Reichsstand) and conferred upon him and his family the status ofLandeshoheit,i.e. the semi-sovereignty which distinguished Germany and Austria's high nobility (theHochadel) from the lower nobility (Niederadel), who had no representation in the Diet and usually answered to an over-lord.

Thus thereichsständischeimperial counts pegged their interests and status to those of the imperial princes. In 1521 there were 144 imperial counts; by 1792 only 99 were left. The decrease reflected elevations to higher title, extinction of the male line, and purchase or annexation (outright or by the subordination known asmediatisation) by more powerful imperial princes.

In 1792 there were four associations (benches) of counties contributing the votes of 99 families to the Diet'sReichsfürstenrat:

theLower Rhenish-Westphalian Associationof Imperial Counts, with 33 members
theWetterau Association of Imperial Counts,with 25 members
theSwabian Associationof Imperial Counts, with 24 members
theFranconian Associationof Imperial Counts, with 17 members

By theTreaty of Lunévilleof 1800, princely domains west of theRhine Riverwere annexed toFrance,including imperial counts. In theFinal Recess of the Imperial Delegation of 1803,those deemed to have resisted the French were compensated with secularized Church lands andfree cities.Some of the counts, such asAspremont-Lynden,were generously compensated. Others, such asLeyen,were denied compensation due to failure to resist the French.

By 1806,Napoleon's re-organisation of the continental map squeezed not only all imperial counts but most princes out of existence as quasi-independent entities by the time of the Holy Roman Empire.^[1]Each was annexed by its largest German neighbor, although many were swapped by one sovereign to another as they sought to shape more cohesive borders or lucrative markets. In 1815 theCongress of Viennasought to turn back the clock on theFrench Revolution's politics, but not on the winnowing of Germany's ruling dynasties and myriad maps. The imperial counts and princes were compensated for the loss of their rights as rulers with largely symbolic privileges, gradually eroded but not extinguished until 1918, includingEbenbürtigkeit;the right to inter-marry with Germany's (and, by extension, Europe's) still reigning dynasties,^[1]a prerogative mostreichsunmittelbarfamilies had enjoyed prior tomediatisation.A few counties had been elevated toprincipalitiesby Napoleon. Most of these were also mediatised by the Congress of Vienna. A few of their dynasties held on to their sovereignty until 1918:Lippe,Reuß,SchwarzburgandWaldeck-Pyrmont.

Status of Imperial count

Those counts who received their title byletters patentfrom the emperor or anImperial vicarwere recognized within the subsequentGerman Empireas retaining their titles and rank above counts elevated by lesser sovereigns, even if their family had never held imperial immediacy within the Empire. A comital or other title granted by a German sovereign conferred, in principle, rank only in that sovereign's realm,^[1]although usually recognised as acourtesy titleelsewhere. Titles granted byHabsburgrulers in their capacity as Kings of Hungary,ArchdukesorEmperors of Austriawere not therebyReichsgrafen,nor ranked with comparable precedence even post-1806.

Titular imperial counts usually had no role in the ruling of the Empire, although there were exceptions. Sometimes, when a prince wished to marry a lady of lower rank and have her share his title, the Emperor might elevate her to Imperial countess or even princess (often over the objections of his other family members), but this conferred upon her neither the same title nor rank borne bydynasts,nor did it,ipso facto,prevent the marriage from beingmorganatic.

References and notes

^^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱPine, L. G.(1992).Titles: How the King became His Majesty.New York: Barnes & Noble. pp.49, 67–69, 74–75, 84–85, 108–112.ISBN 978-1-56619-085-5.

[pine-1] ^^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱPine, L. G.(1992).Titles: How the King became His Majesty.New York: Barnes & Noble. pp.49, 67–69, 74–75, 84–85, 108–112.ISBN 978-1-56619-085-5.

[1]