Jump to content

InSight

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

InSight
TheInSightlander with solar panels deployed in a cleanroom during preflight testing
NamesInSight
GEMS
Discovery 12
Mission typeMarslander
OperatorNASA/JPL
COSPAR ID2018-042AEdit this at Wikidata
SATCATno.43457
Websitescience.nasa.gov
Mission durationPlanned: 709sols(2 years)[1]
Final: 1440sols(4 years, 19 days)
Spacecraft properties
ManufacturerLockheed Martin Space
Launch mass694 kg (1,530 lb)[2]
Landing mass358 kg (789 lb)
Dimensions6.0 × 1.56 × 1.0 m (19.7 × 5.1 × 3.3 ft) (deployed)[3]
Power600 watts
Start of mission
Launch date5 May 2018, 11:05:01UTC
RocketAtlas V401[4]
AV-078
Launch siteVandenberg,SLC-3E
ContractorUnited Launch Alliance
Entered service26 November 2018
End of mission
DisposalDecommissioned
Declared21 December 2022
Last contact15 December 2022 (official)[5][6]
Marslander
Landing date26 November 2018, 19:52:59UTC[1]
MSD 51511 05:14AMT
Landing siteElysium Planitia[7][8]
4°30′09″N135°37′24″E/ 4.5024°N 135.6234°E/4.5024; 135.6234(InSightlanding site)[9]
Flyby ofMars
Spacecraft componentMars Cube One(MarCO)
Closest approach26 November 2018, 19:52:59UTC[1]
Distance3,500 km (2,200 mi)[10]

InSight mission logo
Lucy

TheInterior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport(InSight)[1]mission was aroboticlanderdesigned to study the deep interior of the planetMars.[1][11][12]It was manufactured byLockheed Martin Space,was managed by NASA'sJet Propulsion Laboratory(JPL),[13]and two of its three scientific instruments were built by European agencies.[14]The mission launched on 5 May 2018 at 11:05:01UTCaboard anAtlas V-401launch vehicle[15]and successfully landed[16]atElysium Planitiaon Mars on 26 November 2018 at 19:52:59 UTC.[17][18][15][19]InSightwas active on Mars for 1440sols(1480days;4 years, 19 days).

InSight'sobjectives were to place aseismometer,calledSeismic Experiment for Interior Structure(SEIS), on the surface of Mars to measure seismic activity and provide accurate 3D models of the planet's interior; and measure internalheat transferusing a heat probe calledHP3to study Mars' early geological evolution.[20]This was intended to provide a new understanding of how the Solar System'sterrestrial planetsMercury,Venus,Earth,Mars– and Earth'sMoonformed and evolved.

The lander was originally planned for launch in March 2016.[12][21]An instrument problem delayed the launch beyond the 2016launch window.NASA officials rescheduled theInSightlaunch to May 2018[22]and during the wait the instrument was repaired. This increased the total cost from US$675 million to US$830 million.[23][24]

InSightsuccessfully landed on Mars on 26 November 2018. Due to excessive dust on its solar panels preventing it from recharging, NASA putInSightin low-power mode for detecting seismic events in July 2022 and continued monitoring the lander through the operational period ending in December 2022.[25][26]On 20 December 2022, NASA announced that the InSight lander had lost communications with Earth on 15 December 2022, with the end of the mission being declared on 21 December 2022.[5][6][27]

History[edit]

Discovery Program selection[edit]

InSightcomes together with the backshell and surface lander being joined, 2015.

InSightwas initially known asGEMS(Geophysical Monitoring Station), but its name was changed in early 2012 following a request by NASA.[28]Out of 28 proposals from 2010,[29]it was one of the threeDiscovery Programfinalists receiving $3 million in May 2011 to develop a detailed concept study.[30]In August 2012,InSightwas selected for development and launch.[12]Managed by NASA'sJet Propulsion Laboratory(JPL) with participation from scientists from several countries, the mission was cost-capped at US$425 million, not including launch vehicle funding.[31]

By reusing the landing system designed for the MarsPhoenixlander,which successfully landed on Mars in 2008, mission costs and risks were reduced.[32]

Schedule issues[edit]

Lockheed Martin began construction of the lander on 19 May 2014,[33]with general testing starting on 27 May 2015.[34]

A persistent vacuum leak in theCNES-supplied seismometer known as theSeismic Experiment for Interior Structure(SEIS) led NASA to postpone the planned launch in March 2016 to May 2018. WhenInSightwas delayed, the rest of the spacecraft was returned to Lockheed Martin's factory inColoradofor storage, and the Atlas V launch vehicle intended to launch the spacecraft was reassigned to theWorldView-4mission.[35]

On 9 March 2016, NASA officials announced thatInSightwould be delayed until the 2018 launch window at an estimated cost of US$150 million.[22][36]The spacecraft was rescheduled to launch on 5 May 2018 for a Mars landing on 26 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC. The flight plan remained unchanged with launch using an Atlas V launch vehicle fromVandenberg Space Force Basein California.[22][36]NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory was tasked with redesigning and building a new vacuum enclosure for the SEIS instrument, while CNES conducted instrument integration and testing.[37][38]

On 22 November 2017,InSightcompleted testing in a thermal vacuum, also known as TVAC testing, where the spacecraft is put in simulated space conditions with reduced pressure and various thermal loads.[39]On 23 January 2018, after a long storage, its solar panels were once again deployed and tested, and a second silicon chip containing 1.6 million names from the public was added to the lander.[40]

Effects of Martian dust and end of operations[edit]

The InSight lander, powered by solar panels and batteries, relies on periodic wind gusts called "cleaning events"to reduce dust accumulation on the panels. Elysium Planitia, the landing site of InSight, has experienced fewer cleaning events than needed to keep the science operations powered. In February 2021, at the start of the Martian winter, InSight's solar cells were producing 27% of capacity due to a thick covering of dust on the panels. At that time NASA began the process of putting the lander into hibernation mode, shutting down data-gathering instruments on a schedule to conserve enough power to keep the lander electronics warm through the Martian winter. NASA had hoped that weather conditions would improve and allow InSight to store enough energy to come out of hibernation in July 2021.[41] In May 2021, some generation capacity was restored by using the arm to position sand so it could blow onto the solar panels and scour them clean.[42]

NASA determined in May 2022 that there was too much dust on the panels to continue the mission. InSight was generating only one-tenth of the power from the sunlight than it did upon arrival.[26]They put the lander in a low-power mode in July 2022 to continue monitoring for seismic events. NASA continued to monitorInSightuntil the end of 2022, when the spacecraft missed two consecutive communication attempts.[27]

Science background[edit]

The Apollo 11 seismometer, 1969

Seismic vibrations[edit]

Inside Mars InfoGraphic
Mars InSight Lander (17 May 2022)

BothVikingspacecraft carried seismometers mounted on their landers, and in 1976 vibrations were picked up from various lander operations and from the wind.[43]However, theViking 1lander's seismometer did not deploy properly and did not unlock; the locked seismometer could not operate.

TheViking 2seismometer unlocked; it operated and returned data to Earth.[44][45]One problem was accounting for other data. On Sol 80, theViking 2seismometer detected an event.[45]No wind data were recorded at the same time, so it was not possible to determine whether the data indicated a seismic event or wind gust. Other lacking data would have been useful to rule out other sources of vibrations.[45]Two other problems were the location of the lander and that a certain level of wind on Mars caused a loss of sensitivity for theViking 2seismometer.[45]To overcome these and other issues, InSight had many other sensors, was placed directly on the surface, and also had a windshield.

Despite the difficulties, theViking 2seismometer readings were used to estimate a Martian geologicalcrustthickness between 14 and 18 km (8.7 and 11.2 mi) at theViking 2lander site.[46]TheViking 2seismometer did detect vibrations from Mars winds complementing the meteorology results.[46][47]There was the aforementioned candidate for a possiblemarsquake,but it was not particularly definitive. The wind data did prove useful in its own right, and despite the limitations of the data, widespread and large marsquakes were not detected.[48]

Seismometerswere also left on the Moon, starting withApollo 11in 1969, and also byApollo 12,14,15and16missions and provided many insights intolunar seismology,including the discovery ofmoonquakes.[49][50]The Apollo seismic network, which was operated until 1977, detected at least 28 moonquakes up to 5.5 on theRichter scale.[51]

One of the aspects of the InSight mission was to compare the Earth, Moon, and Mars seismic data.[52]

Well, seismic investigation is really the heart of this mission. Seismology is the method that we've used to gain almost everything we know, all the basic information about the interior of the Earth, and we also used it back during the Apollo era to understand and to measure sort of the properties of the inside of the moon. And so, we want to apply the same techniques but use the waves that are generated by Mars quakes, by meteorite impacts to probe deep into the interior of Mars all the way down to its core.

— Gravity Assist: Mars and InSightwith Bruce Banerdt (3 May 2018)[52]

On 4 May 2022, a largemarsquake,estimated at magnitude 5, was detected by theseismometeron the InSight lander.[53]

Mars quake detected (4 May 2022)

On 25 October 2023, scientists, helped by information from InSight, reported that the planet Mars has aradioactivemagma oceanunder its crust.[54]

Planetary precession[edit]

Radio Doppler measurements were taken withVikingand twenty years later withMars Pathfinder,and in each case theaxis of rotationof Mars was estimated. By combining this data, the core size was constrained, because the change in axis of rotation over 20 years allowed aprecessionrate and from that the planet'smoment of inertiato be estimated.[55]InSight'smeasurements of crust thickness, mantle viscosity, core radius and density, and seismic activity were planned to result in a three- to tenfold increase in accuracy compared to previous data.[56]

Objectives[edit]

TheInSightmission placed a single stationary lander on Mars to study its deep interior and address a fundamental issue of planetary and Solar System science: understanding the processes that shaped therocky planetsof the inner Solar System (including Earth) more than four billion years ago.[1]

Comparison of the interiors of Earth, Mars and the Moon (artist concept)

InSight'sprimary objective was to study the earliest evolutionary processes that shaped Mars. By studying the size, thickness, density and overall structure of Mars'core,mantleandcrust,as well as the rate at which heat escapes from the planet's interior,InSightwill provide a glimpse into theevolutionary processesof all of the rocky planets in the inner Solar System.[57][1]The rocky inner planets share a common ancestry that begins withaccretion.As the body increases in size, its interior heats up and evolves to become aterrestrial planet,containing a core, mantle and crust.[1]Despite this common ancestry, each of the terrestrial planets is later shaped and molded through the poorly understood process ofdifferentiation.InSightmission's goal was to improve the understanding of this process and, by extension, terrestrial evolution, by measuring the planetary building blocks shaped by this differentiation: a terrestrial planet's core, mantle and crust.[1]

InSightlander on Mars (artist concept)

The mission will determine if there is anyseismic activity,measure the rate of heat flow from the interior, estimate the size of Mars'coreand whether the core is liquid or solid.[58]This data would be the first of its kind for Mars.[56]It is also expected that frequentmeteor airbursts(10–200 detectable events per year forInSight) will provide additional seismo-acoustic signals to probe the interior of Mars.[59]The mission's secondary objective was to conduct an in-depth study ofgeophysics,tectonic activityand the effect ofmeteorite impactson Mars,which could provide knowledge about such processes on Earth. Measurements of crust thickness, mantle viscosity, core radius and density, and seismic activity should result in a three- to tenfold increase in accuracy compared to current data.[56]This is the first time a robotic lander dug this deep into the martian crust.

In terms of fundamental processes shaping planetary formation, it is thought that Mars contains the most in-depth and accurate historical record, because it is big enough to have undergone the earliestaccretionand internal heating processes that shaped the terrestrial planets, but is small enough to have retained signs of those processes. The science phase is expected to last for two years.[1]

In March 2021, NASA reported, based on measurements of over 500Marsquakesby theInSightlander on the planet Mars, that the core of Mars is between 1,810 and 1,860 km (1,120 and 1,160 mi), about half the size of thecoreofEarth,and significantly smaller than thought earlier, suggesting a core of lighterelements.[60]

Design[edit]

Artist's rendering of theInSightlander

The mission further develops a design based on the 2008PhoenixMars lander.[61]BecauseInSightis powered bysolar panels,it landed near the equator to enable maximum power for a projected lifetime of two years (1Martian year).[1]The mission includes two relay microsatellites calledMars Cube One(MarCO) that launched withInSightbut were flying in formation withInSightto Mars.[62]

Three major aspects to the InSight spacecraft are thecruise stage,theentry, descent, and landing system,and thelander.[63]

Overall specifications[edit]

Mass
  • Total mass during cruise: 694 kg (1,530 lb)[2]
    • Lander: 358 kg (789 lb)[2]
    • Aeroshell: 189 kg (417 lb)[2]Aeroshell Diameter (backshell and heat shield): 2.64 meters (8.67 ft)[2]
    • Cruise stage: 79 kg (174 lb)[2]
    • Propellant and pressurant: 67 kg (148 lb)[2]
  • Relay probes flew separately but they weighed 13.5 kg (30 lb) each (there were 2)[2]

Lander specifications[edit]

  • Lander mass: 358 kg (789 lb)[2]including about 50 kg of science payload.
    • Mars weight (0.376 of Earth's):[64]1,320 N (300 lbf)
  • About 6.0 m (19.7 ft) wide with solar panels deployed.[2]
  • The science deck is about 1.56 m (5.1 ft) wide and between 0.83 and 1.08 m (2.7 and 3.5 ft) high (depending on leg compression after landing).[2]
  • The length of the robotic arm is 1.8 m (5.9 ft)[2]
  • Tilt of lander at landing on Mars: 4°[65]

Power[edit]

Comparison of single-sol energy generated by various probes on Mars. (30 November 2018)

Power is generated by two roundsolar panels,each 2.15 m (7.1 ft) in diameter when unfurled, and consisting of SolAeroZTJ triple-junction solar cellsmade ofInGaP/InGaAs/Gearranged onOrbital ATKUltraFlex arrays. After touchdown on the Martian surface, the arrays are deployed by opening like afolding fan.[66][67]

  • Rechargeable batteries[68]
  • Solar panels yielded 4.6 kilowatt-hours on Sol 1[69]

Payload[edit]

TheInSightlander with labeled instruments
An animation of HP3mole burrowing into Mars

InSight'slanderpayloadhad a total mass of 50 kg (110 lb), including science instruments and support systems such as the Auxiliary Payload Sensor Suite, cameras, the instrument deployment system, and alaser retroreflector.[2]

InSightperformed three major experiments using SEIS, HP3and RISE.[70]SEIS is a very sensitive seismometer, measuring vibrations; HP3involves a burrowing probe to measure the thermal properties of the subsurface.[70]RISE uses the radio communication equipment on the lander and on Earth to measure the overall movement of planet Mars that could reveal the size and density of its core.

  • TheHeat Flow and Physical Properties Package(HP3), provided by theGerman Aerospace Center(DLR) included a radiometer and a heat flow probe.[76][61][78][79]The probe, referred to as a "self-hammering nail" and nicknamed "the mole",was designed to burrow 5 m (16 ft) below the Martian surface while trailing a tether, with embedded heat sensors to study the thermal properties of Mars' interior, and thus reveal unique information about the planet's geologic history.[76][61][78][79]The hammering mechanism inside the mole was designed by the Polish company Astronika and the Space Research Centre of thePolish Academy of Sciencesunder contract and in cooperation with DLR.[80]The tether contains precise temperature sensors every 10 cm (3.9 in) to measure the temperature profile of the subsurface.[76][81]
  • TheRotation and Interior Structure Experiment(RISE) led by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), was a radio science experiment that uses the lander'sX bandradio to provide precise measurements of planetary rotation to better understand the interior of Mars.[82]X band radio tracking, capable of an accuracy under 2 cm (0.79 in), builds on previousViking programandMars Pathfinderdata.[76]The previous data allowed thecoresize to be estimated, but with more data fromInSight,thenutationamplitude can be determined.[76]Once spin axis direction, precession, and nutation amplitudes are better understood, it should be possible to calculate the size and density of the Martian core andmantle.[76]This should increase the understanding of the formation of terrestrial planets (e.g. Earth) and rockyexoplanets.[76]
  • Temperature and Winds for InSight(TWINS), fabricated by theSpanish Astrobiology Center,monitorsweatherat the landing site.[56][77]
  • Laser RetroReflector for InSight(LaRRI) is acorner cuberetroreflectorprovided by theItalian Space Agencyand mounted onInSight'stop deck.[83][84]It enables passivelaser range-findingby orbiters after the lander is retired,[85]and will function as a node in a proposed Mars geophysical network.[86]This device previously flew on theSchiaparellilanderas the Instrument for Landing-Roving Laser Retroreflector Investigations (INRRI), and is an aluminum dome 54 mm (2.1 in) in diameter and 25 g (0.9 oz) in mass featuring eightfused silicareflectors.[85]
  • Instrument Deployment Arm(IDA) is a 1.8 m (5.9 ft) robotic arm that deployed the SEIS, wind and thermal shield, and HP3instruments to Mars' surface.[87]It is a 4DOFmotorized manipulator, constructed fromcarbon-fiber compositetubes. Originally intended for the canceledMars Surveyormission, the IDA features a scoop,wax actuatedgrappling claw, and the IDC camera.[88][89]
  • TheInstrument Deployment Camera(IDC) is a color camera based on theMars Exploration RoverandMars Science Laboratorynavcamdesign. It is mounted on the Instrument Deployment Arm and images the instruments on the lander's deck and providesstereoscopicviews of the terrain surrounding the landing site. It features a 45° field of view and uses a 1024 × 1024 pixelCCDdetector.[90]The IDC sensor was originally black and white for best resolution; a program was enacted that tested with a standard Hazcam and, since development deadlines and budgets were met, it was replaced with a color sensor.[91]
  • TheInstrument Context Camera(ICC) is a color camera based on the MER/MSLHazcamdesign. It is mounted below the lander's deck, and with itswide-angle120° panoramic field of view provides a complementary view of the instrument deployment area. Like the IDC, it uses a 1024 × 1024 pixelCCDdetector.[90]
A test of the 2.4 meter long Instrument Deployment Arm, seen deployingSEIS
HP3on the lander deck on Sol 10
HP3diagram
TWINSmeteorological sensor

The two relay 6U cubesats were part of the overall InSight program, and were launched at the same time as the lander but they were attached to the centaur upper stage (InSight's second stage in the launch). They were ejected from the stage after launch and coasted to Mars independent of the main InSight cruise stage with the lander.[92]

Twin Lander[edit]

JPL also built a full-scale engineering model, namedForeSight.This was used to practice instrument deployment, trial new ways to deploy the HP3instrument, and test methods to reduce seismometer noise.[93]

With the mission now ended, the testbed is being scrapped and its parts will be offered to other teams such as theMars Sample Retrieval Lander (SRL)for the Mars Sample Return campaign at JPL to be repurposed for their own needs. Anything that is not needed will go into storage. As of now, no attempt is planned to be undertaken to restore ForeSight or to send it to a museum.[94]

Journey to Mars[edit]

Launch[edit]

On 28 February 2018,InSightwas shipped viaC-17 cargo aircraftfrom the Lockheed Martin Space building inDenvertoVandenberg Air Force BaseinCaliforniain order to be integrated to the launch vehicle.[95]The lander was launched on 5 May 2018 and arrived on Mars at approximately 19:54 UTC on 26 November 2018.

The launch of theAtlas Vrocket carryingInSightandMarCOfromVandenberg Space Launch Complex 3-E

The spacecraft was launched on 5 May 2018 at 11:05 UTC on an Atlas V 401 launch vehicle (AV-078) fromVandenberg Air Force Base Space Launch Complex 3-East.[15]This was the first Americaninterplanetary missionto launch from California.[96]

The launch was managed by NASA'sLaunch Services Program.InSightwas originally scheduled for launch on 4 March 2016 on anAtlas V401 (4 meter fairing/zero (0)solid rocket boosters/single (1) engineCentaur) fromVandenberg Air Force Basein California, U.S.,[96]but was called off in December 2015 due to a vacuum leak on the SEIS instrument.[97][98][99]The rescheduled launch window ran from 5 May to 8 June 2018.

Major components of the launch vehicle include:

  • Common Core Booster
  • This launch did not use additional solid rocket boosters
  • Centaurwith Relay CubeSats
  • InSight in a Payload fairing

The journey to Mars took 6.5 months across 484 million km (301 million mi) for a touchdown on 26 November.[15][19]After a successful landing, a three-month-long deployment phase commenced as part of its two-year (a little more than oneMartian year) prime mission.[100][101]

Service tower rolls back.
Pre-launch
InSight heading to space
InSighton way to Mars
Exterior (artist concept)
Interior

Cruise[edit]

An animation ofInSight'strajectory from 5 May 2018 to 26 November 2018:
InSight·Earth·Mars

After its launch from Earth on 5 May in 2018, it coasted through interplanetary space for 6.5 months traveling across 484 million km (301 million mi) for a touchdown on 26 November in that year.[15][19]

InSight cruise stage departed Earth at a speed of 10,000 kilometres per hour (6,200 mph).[1]The MarCo probes were ejected from the 2nd stage Centaur booster and traveled to Mars independent of the InSight cruise stage, but they were all launched together.[citation needed]

During the cruise to Mars, the InSight cruise stage made several course adjustments, and the first of these (TCM-1) took place on 22 May 2018.[1]The cruise stage that carries the lander includes solar panels, antenna, star trackers,Sun sensor,inertial measurement unitamong its technologies.[1]The thrusters are actually on theInSightlander itself, but there are cutouts in the shell so the relevant rockets can vent into space.[2]

The final course correction was 25 November 2018, the day before its touch down.[102]A few hours before making contact with the Martian atmosphere, the cruise stage was jettisoned, on 26 November 2018.[102]

Entry, descent, and landing[edit]

On 26 November 2018, at approximately 19:53 UTC, mission controllers received a signal via theMars Cube One(MarCO) satellites that the spacecraft had successfully touched down[16]atElysium Planitia.[15][17][19]After landing, the mission took three months to deploy and commission the geophysical science instruments.[100][101]It then began its mission of observing Mars, which was planned to last for two years.[1]

The spacecraft's mass that entered the atmosphere of Mars was 1,340 lb (608 kg).[103]There were three major stages to InSight's landing:[104]

  • Entry: after separating from the cruise stage theaeroshellenters the atmosphere and is subject to air and dust in the Martian atmosphere.
  • Parachute descent: at a certain speed and altitude aparachuteis deployed to slow the lander further.
  • Rocket descent: closer to the ground the parachute is ejected and the lander uses rocket engines to slow the lander before touchdown.

Landing sequence:[102]

  • 25 November 2018, final course correction before EDL.
  • 26 November 2018, Cruise stage jettisoned before entering the atmosphere.
  • Several minutes later, the aeroshell containing the lander makes contact with the upper Martian atmosphere at 12,300 mph (19,800 km/h).
    • At this point it is 80 miles (130 km) above Mars and in the next few minutes it lands, but undergoes many stages.[104]
  • Aeroshell is heated to 1,500 °C (2,730 °F) during descent.
  • At 385 m/s (1,260 ft/s) and ~11,100 m (36,400 ft) above the surface, the parachute is deployed.
  • Several seconds later, the heat shield is jettisoned from the lander.
  • The landing legs extended.
  • Landing radar activated.
  • Backshell jettisoned at a speed of about 60 m/s (200 ft/s) and at 1,100 m (3,600 ft) altitude.
  • Landing rockets turned on.
  • Roughly 50 m (160 ft) from the ground constant velocity mode is entered.
  • Approaches ground at about 5 mph (8.0 km/h).
  • Touchdown—each of the three lander legs have a sensor to detect ground contact.
  • Descent rockets are turned off at touchdown.
  • Begin surface operations.

The lander's mass is about 358 kg (789 lb)[2]but on Mars, which has 0.376 of Earth's[64]gravity, it only weighs the equivalent of a 135 kg (298 lb) object on Earth.

Illustration of the InSight cruise stage and lander separating prior to landing
Touchdown on Elysium Planitia (animation)
A simulated view of NASA's InSight lander about to land on the surface of Mars
First lighton the surface of Mars from the Instrument Context Camera (ICC, left) and the Instrument Deployment Camera (IDC, right)
26 November 2018 (Touch down-day // Sol 0)
After InSight landing (14 December 2018)
The pits made by thrusters (contrast-enhanced without color-correction)
The soil churned by thrusters

On 26 November 2018, InSight successfully touched down in Elysium Planitia.[16]

A few hours after landing, NASA's2001 Mars Odysseyorbiter relayed signals indicating thatInSight'ssolar panelshad successfully unfurled and are generating enough electrical power to recharge its batteries daily.Odysseyalso relayed a pair of images showingInSight'slanding site.[105]More images were acquired instereopairs to create 3D images, allowingInSightto find the best locations on the surface to place the heat probe and seismometer. Over the next few weeks,InSightchecked health indicators and monitor both weather and temperature conditions at the landing site.[100]

Landing site[edit]

The InSight Lander as viewed from theMRO(23 September 2019)
InSight Lander – panorama (9 December 2018)
Views from the Mars InSight lander (animated)
Sunrise (April 2022)
Clouds (April 2019)
Sunset (April 2022)
InSightlanding zone is in the south and west of this grid, near 4.5° North and 136° East, this is south and to the west ofElysium MonsandEddie crater.
The image footprints by HiRise onMars Reconnaissance Orbiterfor studying the plannedInsightlanding ellipse. From east to west the scale is about 160 km (100 mi).
InSightfinal landing location (red dot)
(13 December 2018)
An artist's concept depicts NASA's InSight lander after it has deployed its instruments on the Martian surface
The NASA's InSight spacecraft unlatched its robotic arm on 27 November 2018, the day after it landed on Mars.
InSight on Mars − clear view (open lens cover) of landing area (ICC;30 November 2018)
InSight parachute, lander, shield (11 December 2018)
InSight parachute, lander, shield (26 November 2018)

AsInSight'sscience goals are not related to any particular surface feature of Mars, potential landing sites were chosen on the basis of practicality. Candidate sites needed to be near theequatorof Mars to provide sufficient sunlight for the solar panels year round, have a low elevation to allow for sufficient atmospheric braking duringEDL,be flat and relatively rock-free to reduce the probability of complications during landing, and have soft enough terrain to allow the heat flow probe to penetrate well into the ground.[citation needed]

An optimal area that meets all these requirements isElysium Planitia,so all 22 initial potential landing sites were located in this area.[106]The only two other areas on the equator and at low elevation,Isidis PlanitiaandValles Marineris,are too rocky. In addition, Valles Marineris has too steep a gradient to allow safe landing.[7]

In September 2013, the initial 22 potential landing sites were narrowed down to four, and theMars Reconnaissance Orbiterwas then used to gain more information on each of the four potential sites before a final decision was made.[7][107]Each site consists of alanding ellipsethat measures about 130 by 27 km (81 by 17 mi).[108]

In March 2017, scientists from theJet Propulsion Laboratoryannounced that the landing site had been selected. It is located in western Elysium Planitia at4°30′N135°54′E/ 4.5°N 135.9°E/4.5; 135.9(InSightlanding site).[109]The landing site is about 600 km (370 mi) north from where theCuriosityroveris operating inGale Crater.[110]

On 26 November 2018, the spacecraft successfully touched down at its landing site,[16]and in early December 2018InSightlander and EDL components were imaged from space on the surface of Mars.[111]The images provided precise position of the lander:4°30′09″N135°37′24″E/ 4.5024°N 135.6234°E/4.5024; 135.6234.[9]

Mars InSight Lander – Self-portraits
First (11 December 2018)
Second (11 April 2019)
Third (24 April 2022)
Before/After 1223 days of dust

Surface operations[edit]

On 26 November 2018, NASA reported that theInSightlander had landed successfully on Mars. The meteorological suite (TWINS) and magnetometer were operational, and the mission took approximately three months to deploy and commission the geophysical science instruments.[100][101]After landing, the dust was allowed to settle for a few hours, during which time the solar array motors were warmed up and then the solar panels were unfurled.[112][69][113]The lander then reported its systems' status, acquired some images, and it powered down tosleep modefor its first night on Mars. On its first sol on Mars it set a new solar power record of 4.6 kilowatt-hours generated for a single Martian day (known as a"sol").[69]This amount is enough to support operations and deploy the sensors.[114]

InSighton the surface of Mars (6 December 2018)
Deck and science instruments
Robotic arm over Martian soil
Robotic arm and deck
One of its two solar panels
Deployment of wind and thermal shield
Deployment of heat probe (HP³)
InSightseismometerdeployed, first time onto the surface of another planet (19 December 2018)[115]
The seismometer deployment animation from Instrument Context Camera
The seismometer deployment animation from Instrument Deployment Camera
The seismometer deployed.
The wind and thermal shield deployed over seismometer (Sol 110)
The lander (green) and shield (white dot) – viewed from space (4 February 2019)

On 7 December 2018,InSightrecorded the sounds of Martian winds with SEIS, which is able to record vibrations within human hearing range, although rather low (aka subwoofer-type sounds), and these were sent back to Earth.[116]This was the first time the sound of Mars wind was heard[116]after two previous attempts.[117]

On 19 December 2018, the SEIS instrument was deployed onto the surface of Mars next to the lander by its robotic arm,[115]and it was commissioned on 4 February 2019.[118]After the seismometer became fully operational, the heat probe instrument was deployed on 12 February 2019.[119][120]

In April 2019, NASA reported that the MarsInSightlander detected its firstmarsquake.[121][122]

Mars – InSight Lander – Seismic Event (AudioVideoFile;Sol 128; 6 April 2019)

In September 2019, researchers reported thatInSightuncovered unexplainedmagnetic pulses,andmagnetic oscillations.[123]

On 24 February 2020, a summary of studies over the past year from InSight was presented which indicated that the planet Mars has active quakes, dust devils and magnetic pulses.[124][125]

InSight'srobotic arm cleans dust from the solar panel.
(video; 0:08; 22 May 2021)

In February 2020, according to new data gathered from NASA's InSight lander, it was found that the Martian magnetic field at the landing site is about 10 times stronger than previously thought, and fluctuates rapidly.[126][127]

On 12 April 2021, it was reported that Insight went into emergency hibernation because itsSolar panelswere filled withMartian dust.[128]

On 14 April, the lander began to transmit images after waking from hibernation.[129]

On 3 May 2021, InSight used its robotic arm to trickle sand beside a solar panel. The InSight team wanted to let the sand blow away and touch the solar panels, sticking some dust particles to it, before leaving the solar panel. The sand trickle resulted in a boost in power of 30 watt-hours per sol.[130]

In July 2021 three papers studying Mars' interior structure were published. Seismometer data confirms that the center of Mars is molten. The crust of Mars is thinner than expected and may have two or three sub-layers.[131]

In January 2022, InSight went intosafe modedue to aregional dust stormin the area, which caused a reduction in sunlight. During its time in safe mode, all but essential functions were suspended. It left safe mode on 19 January 2022 and resumed normal operations, however all science instruments were left off in the mean time.[132]

As of May 2022, Insight has recorded 1,313 Marsquakes.[133]

The seismometer (SEIS), radio experiment (RISE) and the weather instruments (TWINS) continue to operate as the lander's Mars surface mission was extended by two years, until end of December 2022.[134]The reason the mission was retired was due to insufficient power generation on the solar panels, due to dust accumulation.[135]

Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package[edit]

On 28 February 2019, theHeat Flow and Physical Properties Packageprobe (mole) started digging into the surface of Mars. The probe and its digging mole were intended to reach a maximum depth of 5 m (16 ft) but it only went about 0.35 m (1.1 ft), or three-quarters of the way out of its housing structure. After many attempts, the effort was given up as a failure in January 2021.

InSight– Heat probe problem (June 2019)
Deploying probe
Problem – signs of shifting
Current position
Testing solutions
Possible solution
Prep for solution
"Mole" uncovered
Mars InSight Lander - Attempts to solve mole problem
"Pinning" helps to bury the mole. (17 October 2019)
Mole partially backs out of the hole it made. (26 October 2019)
Mole tests (3 November 2019)
Insight lander using its scoop to push on the back cap of the HP3mole

In October 2019, the researchers at JPL concluded that the soil on Mars does not provide necessary friction for drilling, causing the mole to bounce around and form a wide pit around itself rather than dig deeper. They attempted a maneuver calledpinningin which they pressed the side of the scoop against the mole location to pin the side of the wall of the hole and increase friction.[136]Pinning was initially successful,[137]but then the mole backed out of its hole after a few weeks, suggesting the soil is accumulating below the mole.[138][139]

In February 2020, the team reevaluated the risks of pushing the scoop directly against the back cap of the mole, and determined the procedure to be acceptable.[140]

In June 2020, the team reported that the mole was finally underground, and was being evaluated to determine if the mole was able to dig as designed.[141]On 9 July 2020, it was revealed that images taken on 20 June 2020 showed the mole bouncing again, indicating that it did not have sufficient friction to dig deeper. One suggested solution was to partially fill the hole with soil to increase friction.[142]

Mars InSight Lander - "Mole" - Final Efforts
(9 January 2021)

In early 2021, the InSight team announced they would attempt to detect the arrival of theMars 2020mission using InSight's seismometers. Pre-landing modeling of the signals from Mars 2020'sentry, descent and landingsequence suggested that the most probable source of any potential signal would be the impact of the spacecraft's cruise mass balance devices with the Martian surface, at speeds of around 4000 m/s.[143][144]Shortly after successfully landing thePerseverance Rover,NASA announced that its landing went undetected by InSight. This helped demonstrate that Mars has a seismic efficiency of less than 3%.[145]

By August 2020, the operations team had made some progress using the scoop to assist the mole in digging deeper into its hole, by pressing against the back. The scoop was used to fill the hole of the partially submerged mole, burying it fully for the first time. The team hoped the mole can now dig further into the surface on its own, possibly with the additional assistance of the scoop.[146]

On 14 January 2021, the heat probe part of the mission was declared to be over, after the science team had determined that the soil properties at the landing location were incompatible with what the instrument had been designed for. The team attempted many different remedies over nearly two years to get the mole to burrow into the soil, but in the end, the attempts did not succeed. The friction between the soil and the probe was not enough for the mole to hammer itself down through the soil. Another set of attempts to get the probe deeper took place on 9 January 2021. After they proved unsuccessful, the decision was made to leave the probe as is and end attempts to dig deeper.

The mole did, with all the assisting measures, burrow itself completely underground. The top of the mole is 2 to 3 centimetres below the Martian surface. To be able to produce the intended scientific measurements, the mole needed to have dug itself at least 3 metres deep. Thus the mole was unsuccessful at producing its intended scientific results.

However the mole's operations did produce useful and interesting results about the soil at the InSight site; about conducting excavation, or drilling, on Mars; and about operating the lander's robotic arm through the mole-rescue efforts that used the arm in ways that were unplanned before the mission.[134]

MarCO spacecraft[edit]

Flight hardware of Mars Cube One (MarCO) (folded up)
MarCO CubeSats relaying data duringInSight'slanding (artist concept)

TheMars Cube One(MarCO) spacecraft are a pair of 6UCubeSatsthat piggybacked with theInSightmission to test CubeSat navigation and endurance in deep space, and to help relay real-time communications (with an eight-minute lightspeed delay)[101]during the probe'sentry, descent and landing(EDL) phase.[147][148]The two 6U CubeSats, named MarCO A and B, are identical.[149]They were launched along withInSight,but separated soon after reaching space,[150]and they flew as a pair for redundancy while flanking the lander.[62]They did not enter orbit, but flew past Mars during the EDL phase of the mission and relayedInSight'stelemetry in real time.[151][152]The success of the MarCO spacecraft proved the viability of the cubesat platform for deep space missions and helped serve as a technical demonstration for potential future missions of a similar nature. On 5 February 2019, NASA reported that the CubeSats went silent, and are unlikely to be heard from again.[153]

Team and participation[edit]

NASA team cheers as theInSightLander touches down on Mars. (26 November 2018)[16]

TheInSightscience and engineering team includes scientists and engineers from many disciplines, countries and organizations. The science team assigned toInSightincludes scientists from institutions in the U.S., France, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Japan, Switzerland, Spain, Poland and the United Kingdom.[157]

Mars Exploration Roverproject scientist W. Bruce Banerdt is theprincipal investigatorfor theInSightmission and the lead scientist for the SEIS instrument.[158]Suzanne Smrekar,whose research focuses on the thermal evolution of planets and who has done extensive testing and development on instruments designed to measure the thermal properties and heat flow on other planets,[159]is the lead forInSight'sHP3instrument. The Principal Investigator for RISE is William Folkner at JPL.[2]The SEIS Instrument PI is Philippe Lognonné of IPGP, and the HP3 Instrument PI is Tilman Spohn of the DLR Institute of Planetary Research. TheInSightmission team also includes project manager Tom Hoffman and deputy project manager Henry Stone.[157]

Major contributing agencies and institutions are:[84]

InSight team at JPL

Name chips[edit]

As part of its public outreach, NASA organized a program where members of the public were able to have their names sent to Mars aboardInSight.Due to its launch delay, two rounds of sign-ups were conducted totaling 2.4 million names:[160][161]826,923 names were registered in 2015[162]and a further 1.6 million names were added in 2017.[163]Anelectron beamwas used toetchletters only11000the width of a humanhair(1μm)[164]onto 8 mm (0.3 in)siliconwafers.[162]The first chip was installed on the lander in November 2015 and the second on 23 January 2018.[162][163]

Name chips onInSight
One name chip installed
The first name chip forInSight
The second name chip, inscribed with 1.6 million names, is placed onInSightin January 2018.
Name chips on Mars

Gallery[edit]

Instrument Context Camera (ICC), November 2018
First image from Mars, clear lens cap on
First image with annotations
Without clear lens cover

Context map[edit]

Map of Mars
Interactive image mapof theglobal topography of Mars,overlaid with the position ofMartian roversandlanders.Coloring of the base map indicates relative elevations of Martian surface.
Clickable image:Clicking on the labels will open a new article.
(ActiveInactivePlanned)
Bradbury Landing
Deep Space 2
Mars Polar Lander
Perseverance
Schiaparelli EDM
Spirit
Viking 1

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcdefghijklmno"InSight Lander - NASA Science".science.nasa.gov.NASA.2012.Retrieved26 November2018.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  2. ^abcdefghijklmnopq"Mars InSight Launch Press Kit"(PDF).NASA/JPL.May 2018.Archived(PDF)from the original on 17 October 2020.Retrieved12 December2018.
  3. ^"InSight Lithograph"(PDF).NASA.July 2015. LG-2015-07-072-HQ. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 9 February 2017.Retrieved10 March2016.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  4. ^Stephen Clark (19 December 2013)."Mars lander to launch from California on Atlas 5 in 2016".Spaceflight Now.Archivedfrom the original on 21 December 2013.Retrieved20 December2013.
  5. ^abKenneth Chang (22 December 2022)."NASA's InSight Mission Dies After 4 Years of Listening for Marsquakes".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 21 December 2022.Retrieved21 December2022.
  6. ^abDacia Massengill (20 December 2022)."Saying 'Farewell' to InSight Mars Lander".nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved21 December2022.
  7. ^abc"NASA Evaluates Four Candidate Sites for 2016 Mars Mission".NASA. 4 September 2013.Archivedfrom the original on 28 February 2014.Retrieved4 September2013.
  8. ^Guy Webster (4 March 2015)."Single Site on Mars Advanced for 2016 NASA Lander".insight.jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Archived fromthe originalon 8 March 2015.Retrieved16 December2015.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  9. ^abT. J. Parker; M. P. Golombek; F. J. Calef; N. R. Williams; S. LeMaistre; et al. (March 2019)."Localization of the InSight Lander"(PDF).50thLunar and Planetary Science Conference, Held 18–22 March 2019 at the Woodlands, Texas. LPI Contribution No. 2132, Id.1948(2132): 1948.Bibcode:2019LPI....50.1948P.Archived(PDF)from the original on 20 January 2022.Retrieved22 April2019.
  10. ^Van Kane (8 July 2015)."MarCO: Planetary CubeSats Become Real".The Planetary Society.Archivedfrom the original on 16 January 2020.
  11. ^Kenneth Chang (30 April 2018)."Mars InSight: NASA's Journey into the Red Planet's Deepest Mysteries".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 12 May 2020.Retrieved30 April2018.
  12. ^abcBrian Vastag (20 August 2012)."NASA will send robot drill to Mars in 2016".The Washington Post.Archivedfrom the original on 19 June 2018.Retrieved1 September2017.
  13. ^"InSight".Lockheed Martin.27 January 2021.Retrieved5 February2023.
  14. ^"European Contributions to the InSight mission to Mars".europlanet-society.org.Europlanet Society. 25 November 2018.Retrieved5 February2023.
  15. ^abcdefKenneth Chang (5 May 2018)."NASA's InSight Launches for Six-Month Journey to Mars".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 4 January 2020.Retrieved5 May2018.
  16. ^abcde"Opinion: Mars Beckons".The New York Times.27 November 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved28 November2018.
  17. ^abKenneth Chang (26 November 2018)."NASA's InSight Mission Has Touched Down on Mars to Study the Red Planet's Deep Secrets".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 10 March 2020.Retrieved26 November2018.
  18. ^Adam Gabbatt (26 November 2018)."InSight lander touches down on Mars – as it happened".The Guardian.Archivedfrom the original on 2 December 2018.Retrieved26 November2018.
  19. ^abcd"About InSight's Launch".mars.nasa.gov.NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 9 September 2018.Retrieved8 February2018.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  20. ^"What are InSight's Science Tools?".NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 3 December 2018.Retrieved25 January2023.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  21. ^Leonard David (14 November 2017)."NASA's Next Mars Lander Zooms toward Launch".Scientific American.Archivedfrom the original on 14 November 2017.
  22. ^abcStephen Clark (9 March 2016)."InSight Mars lander escapes cancellation, aims for 2018 launch".Spaceflight Now.Archivedfrom the original on 18 March 2016.Retrieved9 March2016.
  23. ^Guy Webster; Dwayne Brown; Laurie Cantillo (2 September 2016)."NASA Approves 2018 Launch of Mars InSight Mission".nasa.gov.NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 30 December 2019.Retrieved8 January2018.
  24. ^Robert Lee Hotz (26 November 2018)."NASA's InSight Spacecraft Lands Safely on Mars".The Wall Street Journal.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved27 November2018.
  25. ^Tricia Talbert (8 January 2021)."NASA Extends Exploration for Two Planetary Science Missions".nasa.gov.NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 16 January 2021.Retrieved9 January2021.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  26. ^ab"Dusty demise for NASA Mars lander in July, power dwindling".NBC News.18 May 2022.Archivedfrom the original on 23 December 2022.Retrieved18 May2022.
  27. ^abBeth Ridgeway."NASA Retires InSight Mars Lander Mission After Years of Science".nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved21 December2022.
  28. ^Jason Wells (28 February 2012)."JPL changes name of Mars mission proposal".Los Angeles Times.Retrieved25 September2016.
  29. ^"New NASA Mission To take First Look Deep Inside Mars".science.nasa.gov.NASA.20 August 2012. Archived fromthe originalon 4 June 2016.Retrieved26 August2012.
  30. ^Dwayne C. Brown (5 May 2011)."NASA Selects Investigations For Future Key Planetary Mission".nasa.gov.NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 7 May 2011.Retrieved6 May2011.Public DomainThis article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
  31. ^Kate Taylor (9 May 2011)."NASA picks project shortlist for next Discovery mission".TG Daily.Archived fromthe originalon 4 September 2012.Retrieved20 May2011.
  32. ^Lee Cavendish (25 November 2018)."Journey to the Center of the Red Planet: NASA's InSight Lander to Reveal the Secrets Inside Mars".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved28 November2018.
  33. ^Guy Webster; Dwayne C. Brown; Gary Napier (19 May 2014)."Construction to Begin on 2016 NASA Mars Lander".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved20 May2014.
  34. ^Guy Webster; Dwayne C. Brown (27 May 2015)."NASA Begins Testing Mars Lander for Next Mission to Red Planet".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved28 May2015.
  35. ^Stephen Clark (5 March 2016)."Fate of NASA's InSight Mars mission to be decided soon".Spaceflight Now.Archivedfrom the original on 16 November 2018.Retrieved9 March2016.
  36. ^abKenneth Chang (9 March 2016)."NASA Reschedules Mars InSight Mission for May 2018".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 20 May 2019.Retrieved9 March2016.
  37. ^abJeff Foust (28 March 2016)."InSight's Second Chance".The Space Review.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2018.Retrieved5 April2016.
  38. ^"NASA Targets May 2018 Launch of Mars InSight Mission".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.9 March 2016.Retrieved9 March2016.
  39. ^Chris Bergin (22 November 2017)."Mars InSight mission passes TVAC testing ahead of 2018 launch".NASASpaceflight.Archivedfrom the original on 7 September 2018.Retrieved6 January2018.
  40. ^Andrew Good (23 January 2018)."NASA's Next Mars Lander Spreads its Solar Wings".mars.nasa.gov.NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 26 January 2021.Retrieved26 January2018.
  41. ^Morgan McFall-Johnsen (15 April 2021)."NASA's Insight Mars Lander Is 'in Crisis', And Has Entered Emergency Hibernation".Science Alert.Archivedfrom the original on 15 April 2021.Retrieved15 April2021.
  42. ^Mike Wehner (4 June 2021)."NASA's InSight Mars lander dumped dirt on itself on purpose".BGR.Archivedfrom the original on 22 December 2022.Retrieved22 December2022.
  43. ^D. L. Anderson; W. F. Miller; G. V. Latham; Y. Nakamura; M. N. Toksöz; et al. (30 September 1977)."Signatures of Internally Generated Lander Vibrations"(PDF).Journal of Geophysical Research.82(28): 4524–4546, A–2.Bibcode:1977JGR....82.4524A.doi:10.1029/JS082i028p04524.Archived(PDF)from the original on 1 February 2018.Retrieved31 January2018.
  44. ^"Happy (25th) Anniversary, Viking Lander ".science.nasa.gov.NASA.20 July 2001. Archived fromthe originalon 16 May 2017.Retrieved31 January2018.
  45. ^abcdR. D. Lorenz; Y. Nakamura (2013)."Viking Seismometer Record: Data Restoration and Dust Devil Search"(PDF).44thLunar and Planetary Science Conference (2013)(1719): 1178.Bibcode:2013LPI....44.1178L.Archived(PDF)from the original on 12 February 2017.Retrieved2 November2022.
  46. ^abElizabeth Howell (6 December 2012)."Viking 2: Second Landing on Mars".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 15 November 2017.Retrieved15 November2017.
  47. ^Y. Nakamura; D. L. Anderson (June 1979)."Martian wind activity detected by a seismometer at Viking lander 2 site"(PDF).Geophysical Research Letters.6(6): 499–502.Bibcode:1979GeoRL...6..499N.doi:10.1029/GL006i006p00499.Archived(PDF)from the original on 22 December 2018.Retrieved8 December2018.
  48. ^Ralph D. Lorenz; Yosio Nakamura; James R. Murphy (November 2017)."Viking-2 Seismometer Measurements on Mars: PDS Data Archive and Meteorological Applications".Earth and Space Science.4(11): 681–688.Bibcode:2017E&SS....4..681L.doi:10.1002/2017EA000306.
  49. ^N. R. Goins; A. M. Dainty; M. N. Toksöz (10 June 1981). "Lunar seismology – The Internal Structure of the Moon".Journal of Geophysical Research.86:5061–5074.Bibcode:1981JGR....86.5061G.doi:10.1029/JB086iB06p05061.hdl:1721.1/52843.
  50. ^Nora Taylor Tillman (6 January 2011)."Details of the Moon's Core Revealed by 30-year-old Data".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 10 May 2022.Retrieved10 May2022.
  51. ^Trudy E. Bell (15 March 2006)."Moonquakes".science.nasa.gov.NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 23 February 2018.Retrieved31 January2018.
  52. ^abBruce Banerdt (3 May 2018)."Gravity Assist: Mars and InSight with Bruce Banerdt".solarsystem.nasa.gov.NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 16 January 2020.Retrieved22 December2018.
  53. ^Andrew Good; Karen Fox; Alana Johnson (9 May 2022)."NASA's InSight Records Monster Quake on Mars".nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved10 May2022.
  54. ^Robin George Andrews (25 October 2023)."A Radioactive Sea of Magma Hides Under the Surface of Mars".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 25 October 2023.Retrieved26 October2023.
  55. ^abBruce Banerdt (March 2013).InSight: A Geophysical Mission to a Terrestrial Planet Interior(PDF).Committee on Astrobiology and Planetary Science. 6–8 March 2013. Washington, D.C.Archived(PDF)from the original on 15 March 2017.Retrieved2 February2018.
  56. ^abcdBanerdt, W. Bruce (2013).InSight Project Status(PDF).28th Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Meeting. 23 July 2013. Virtual meeting. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 22 December 2016.Retrieved25 September2016.
  57. ^abM. Panning; P. Lognonne; B. Banerdt (October 2017)."Planned Products of the Mars Structure Service for the InSight Mission to Mars"(PDF).Space Science Reviews.211(1–4): 611–650.Bibcode:2017SSRv..211..611P.doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0317-5.hdl:10044/1/48928.S2CID2992209.Archived(PDF)from the original on 29 August 2019.Retrieved29 August2019.
  58. ^Ken Kremer (2 March 2012)."NASA's Proposed 'InSight'Lander would Peer to the Center of Mars in 2016".Universe Today.Archivedfrom the original on 6 March 2012.Retrieved27 March2012.
  59. ^J. Stevanović; N. A. Teanby; J. Wookey; N. Selby; et al. (October 2017)."Bolide Airbursts as a Seismic Source for the 2018 Mars InSight Mission"(PDF).Space Science Reviews.211(1–4): 525–545.Bibcode:2017SSRv..211..525S.doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0327-3.S2CID125102926.Archived(PDF)from the original on 27 April 2019.Retrieved30 September2019.
  60. ^Bob Yirka (19 March 2021)."Data from Insight reveals size of Mars's core".Phys.org.Archivedfrom the original on 19 March 2021.Retrieved19 March2021.
  61. ^abcAgle, D. C. (20 August 2012)."New Insight on Mars Expected From new NASA Mission".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 29 June 2017.Retrieved23 August2012.
  62. ^abc"Mars Cube One (MarCO)".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 13 December 2019.Retrieved8 February2018.
  63. ^mars.nasa.gov."Getting to Mars | Spacecraft".NASA's InSight Mars Lander.Archivedfrom the original on 10 December 2018.Retrieved24 December2018.
  64. ^abMatt Williams (16 December 2016)."How Strong is the Gravity on Mars?".Universe Today.Archivedfrom the original on 31 October 2018.Retrieved9 December2018.
  65. ^"NASA's Martian quake sensor InSight lands at slight angle".France 24.1 December 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 9 December 2018.Retrieved9 December2018.
  66. ^"SolAero Awarded Solar Panel Manufacturing Contract by ATK for NASA's InSight Mars Lander Mission".SolAero(Press release). 26 February 2014. Archived fromthe originalon 24 October 2018.Retrieved13 June2015.
  67. ^"UltraFlex Solar Array Systems"(PDF).Orbital ATK.Archived(PDF)from the original on 13 April 2016.Retrieved13 June2015.
  68. ^Victor Tangermann (27 November 2018)."NASA's InSight Mars Lander Fires up Solar Cells and Sends Selfie".Futurism.Archivedfrom the original on 30 March 2019.Retrieved21 July2019.
  69. ^abcSarah Lewin (3 December 2018)."NASA's InSight Lander on Mars Just Set a Solar Power Record!".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 5 December 2018.Retrieved9 December2018.
  70. ^abErica Naone (30 April 2018)."InSight spacecraft will soon peer deep into the interior of Mars".Astronomy.Archivedfrom the original on 11 December 2018.Retrieved10 December2018.
  71. ^Dwayne C. Brown; Michael Braukus (10 February 2014)."NASA and French Space Agency Sign Agreement for Mars Mission".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved11 February2014.
  72. ^Rebecca Boyle (3 June 2015)."Listening to meteorites hitting Mars will tell us what's inside".New Scientist.Archivedfrom the original on 5 June 2015.Retrieved5 June2015.
  73. ^Kumar, Sunil (1 September 2006).Design and development of a silicon micro-seismometer(PDF)(PhD). Imperial College London.Archived(PDF)from the original on 10 June 2016.Retrieved15 July2015.
  74. ^Matthew Francis (21 August 2012)."New probe to provide InSight into Mars' interior".Ars Technica.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2018.Retrieved21 August2012.
  75. ^Lognonné, P.; Banerdt, W. B.; Giardini, D.; Christensen, U.; Pike, T.; et al. (October 2011).The GEMS (GEophysical Monitoring Station) SEISmometer(PDF).EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011. 2–7 October 2011. Nantes, France.Bibcode:2011epsc.conf.1507L.EPSC-DPS2011-1507-1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 29 July 2016.Retrieved6 September2012.
  76. ^abcdefghBruce Banerdt (2012).InSight – Geophysical Mission to Mars(PDF).26thMars Exploration Program Analysis Group Meeting. 4 October 2012. Monrovia, California.Archived(PDF)from the original on 22 February 2014.Retrieved17 February2014.
  77. ^abDavid, Leonard (15 August 2014)."NASA's Next Mars Lander Will Peer Deep Into Red Planet's History: Here's How".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 12 September 2018.Retrieved16 August2014.
  78. ^abM. Grott; T. Spohn; W. B. Banerdt; S. Smrekar; T. L. Hudson; et al. (October 2011).Measuring Heat Flow on Mars: The Heat Flow and Physical Properties Package on GEMS(PDF).EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011. 2–7 October 2011. Nantes, France.Bibcode:2011epsc.conf..379G.EPSC-DPS2011-379-1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 13 August 2017.Retrieved6 September2012.
  79. ^abKelly, Tiffany (22 May 2013)."JPL begins work on two new missions to Mars".Glendale News-Press.Archived fromthe originalon 29 September 2020.Retrieved24 August2015.
  80. ^"Polish Kret will fly to Mars".Science in Poland.Retrieved1 May2023.
  81. ^"HP3 (Heat Flow and Physical Properties Probe)".NASA. Archived fromthe originalon 25 January 2015.Retrieved24 August2015.
  82. ^V. Dehant; W. Folkner; S. Le Maistre; et al. (October 2011).Geodesy on GEMS (GEophysical Monitoring Station)(PDF).EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011. 2–7 October 2011. Nantes, France.Bibcode:2011epsc.conf.1551D.EPSC-DPS2011-1551.Archived(PDF)from the original on 4 March 2016.Retrieved6 September2012.
  83. ^Dell'Agnello, S.; et al. (October 2017).Lunar, Cislunar, Near/Farside Laser Retroreflectors for the Accurate: Positioning of Landers/Rovers/Hoppers/Orbiters, Commercial Georeferencing, Test of Relativistic Gravity, and Metrics of the Lunar Interior(PDF).2017 Annual Meeting of the Lunar Exploration Analysis Group. 10–12 October 2017. Columbia, Maryland.Bibcode:2017LPICo2041.5070D.Contribution NO. 2041.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2 January 2019.Retrieved5 March2018.
  84. ^abBanerdt, W. Bruce (6 October 2016).InSight Status Report(PDF).32nd Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Meeting. 6 October 2016. Virtual.Archived(PDF)from the original on 23 December 2016.Retrieved2 February2018.
  85. ^ab"Schiaparelli science package and science investigations".European Space Agency. 19 October 2016.Archivedfrom the original on 23 October 2016.Retrieved2 February2018.
  86. ^Dell'Agnello, S. (2016).MoonLIGHT and INRRI: Status and Prospects.CSN2 Space Meeting. 20 July 2016. INFN-LNGS, Italy. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.Archivedfrom the original on 5 March 2018.Retrieved5 March2018.
  87. ^mars.nasa.gov."About the Lander".NASA's InSight Mars Lander.Archivedfrom the original on 21 May 2021.Retrieved3 September2019.
  88. ^Fleischner, Richard (2013)."InSight Instrument Deployment Arm"(PDF).15th European Space Mechanisms and Tribology Symposium.718:14.Bibcode:2013ESASP.718E..14F.Archived(PDF)from the original on 19 November 2022.Retrieved1 September2019.
  89. ^Crazy Engineering: Space Claw on NASA's InSight Mars Lander.NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 16 October 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 14 June 2019.Retrieved1 September2019.
  90. ^ab"Cameras".InSight. NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 16 January 2023.Retrieved8 February2018.
  91. ^Golombek, Matt; Banerdt, W. Bruce (2014).InSight Project Status and Landing Site Selection(PDF).29th Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Meeting. 13–14 May 2014. Crystal City, Virginia.Archived(PDF)from the original on 14 July 2014.Retrieved11 April2015.
  92. ^"MarCO Separates from the Centaur Upper Stage – Mars InSight".blogs.nasa.gov.5 May 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 9 January 2020.Retrieved10 December2018.
  93. ^Pat Brennan (1 November 2022)."NASA Prepares to Say 'Farewell' to InSight Spacecraft".nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved28 November2022.
  94. ^Corinne Purtill (20 December 2022)."As NASA's Mars InSight mission comes to an end, JPL engineers say farewell to its twin".Los Angeles Times.Archivedfrom the original on 27 December 2022.Retrieved27 December2022.
  95. ^Andrew Good; Dwayne C. Brown (28 February 2018)."NASA InSight Mission to Mars Arrives at Launch Site".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved5 March2018.
  96. ^abJoshua Buck; George H. Hiller (19 December 2013)."NASA Awards Launch Services Contract for InSight Mission".nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved11 January2014.
  97. ^"NASA calls off next Mars mission because of instrument leak".Excite News.Associated Press.22 December 2015. Archived fromthe originalon 23 December 2015.Retrieved22 December2015.
  98. ^Kenneth Chang (22 December 2015)."Leaks in Instrument Force NASA to Delay Mars Mission Until 2018".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 20 May 2019.Retrieved22 December2015.
  99. ^D. C. Brown; L. Cantillo; G. Webster; J. Watelet (22 December 2015)."NASA Suspends 2016 Launch of InSight Mission to Mars".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved23 December2015.
  100. ^abcd"Surface Operations".Mars InSight Mission.NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 26 November 2018.Retrieved27 November2018.
  101. ^abcd"NASA InSight Team on Course for Mars Touchdown".NASA/JPL.Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 21 November 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 28 December 2018.Retrieved1 September2019.
  102. ^abcStephen Clark."InSight tweaks trajectory to home in on Mars landing site".Spaceflight Now.Archivedfrom the original on 15 January 2020.Retrieved21 July2019.
  103. ^"Mars Insight Mission Landing".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 10 September 2019.Retrieved2 November2022.
  104. ^abmars.nasa.gov."Entry, Descent, and Landing | Landing".NASA's InSight Mars Lander.Archivedfrom the original on 10 September 2019.Retrieved12 December2018.
  105. ^"InSight Is Catching Rays on Mars – NASA's InSight Mars Lander".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved27 November2018.
  106. ^Vergano, Dan (4 September 2013)."NASA searches for (literally) boring Mars landing site".USA Today.Archivedfrom the original on 15 September 2018.Retrieved5 September2013.
  107. ^Boyle, Alan (5 March 2015)."NASA Picks Prime Target for 2016 InSight Mars Lander".NBC News.Archivedfrom the original on 6 March 2015.Retrieved5 March2015.
  108. ^Wall, Mike (11 March 2015)."NASA Eyeing Landing Site for 2016 Mars Mission".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 13 November 2018.Retrieved11 March2015.
  109. ^Golombek, M.; et al. (2017).Selection of the 2018 Insight Landing Site.48th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 20–24 March 2017. The Woodlands, Texas.Bibcode:2017LPI....48.1515G.LPI Contribution No. 1964, id.1515.
  110. ^"InSight's Landing Site: Elysium Planitia".NASA. 25 January 2018. Archived fromthe originalon 2 January 2019.Retrieved1 February2018.
  111. ^"Mars InSight Lander Seen in First Images from Space".NASA/JPL.Archivedfrom the original on 15 December 2018.Retrieved15 December2018.
  112. ^"Mars InSight Deploys Its Solar Panels – SpaceRef".spaceref.27 November 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 16 January 2023.Retrieved9 December2018.
  113. ^mars.nasa.gov."Surface Operations | Timeline".NASA's InSight Mars Lander.Archivedfrom the original on 26 November 2018.Retrieved9 December2018.
  114. ^Lewin, Sarah (30 November 2018)."NASA's InSight Lander on Mars Just Set a Solar Power Record!".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 24 September 2019.Retrieved21 July2019.
  115. ^abCook, Jia-Rui; Good, Andrew (19 December 2018)."NASA's InSight Places First Instrument on Mars".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 20 December 2018.Retrieved20 December2018.
  116. ^abBrown, Katherine (7 December 2018)."NASA InSight Lander 'Hears' Martian Winds".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 8 December 2018.Retrieved9 December2018.
  117. ^"Mars Microphones".The Planetary Society.Archivedfrom the original on 26 September 2020.Retrieved25 September2020.
  118. ^InSight lander completes seismometer deployment on Mars.Archived14 February 2019 at theWayback MachineStephen Clark,Space Flight Now.4 February 2019.
  119. ^NASA's InSight Prepares to Take Mars' Temperature.Archived13 February 2019 at theWayback MachineJet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA. 13 February 2019.
  120. ^Taking Mars' Vital Signs with CCD Image SensorsArchived1 February 2019 at theWayback Machine.George Leopold,EET Asia.31 January 2019.
  121. ^Brown, Dwayne; Johnson, Alana; Good, Andrew (23 April 2019)."NASA's InSight Detects First Likely 'Quake' on Mars".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 2 January 2021.Retrieved23 April2019.
  122. ^Meghan Bartels (23 April 2019)."Marsquake! NASA's InSight Lander Feels Its 1st Red Planet Tremor".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 25 November 2019.Retrieved23 April2019.
  123. ^Andrews, Robin George (20 September 2019)."Mysterious magnetic pulses discovered on Mars - The nighttime events are among initial results from the InSight lander, which also found hints that the red planet may host a global reservoir of liquid water deep below the surface".National Geographic Society.Archived fromthe originalon 9 February 2021.Retrieved20 September2019.
  124. ^Good, Andrew; Johnson, Alana (24 February 2020)."A Year of Surprising Science From NASA's InSight Mars Mission".NASA.Archivedfrom the original on 26 February 2020.Retrieved24 February2020.
  125. ^Cornell University(24 February 2020)."InSight detects gravity waves, devilish dust on Mars".EurekAlert!.Archivedfrom the original on 25 February 2020.Retrieved25 February2020.
  126. ^Elizabeth Howell (26 February 2020)."Mars lander reveals new details about the Red Planet's strange magnetic field".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 28 February 2020.Retrieved28 February2020.
  127. ^Thompson, Amy (27 February 2020)."NASA's Mars Lander finds that the Red Planet's magnetic field is really weird".TESLARATI.Archivedfrom the original on 28 February 2020.Retrieved28 February2020.
  128. ^"NASA's InSight Mars lander is about to go into hibernation. If its batteries ran out, it could die".Business Insider.Archivedfrom the original on 15 April 2021.Retrieved15 April2021.
  129. ^"NASA.gov".Archivedfrom the original on 27 April 2021.Retrieved27 April2021.
  130. ^mars.nasa.gov (3 June 2021)."NASA's InSight Mars Lander Gets a Power Boost".NASA’s Mars Exploration Program.Archivedfrom the original on 3 June 2021.Retrieved3 June2021.
  131. ^"NASA's InSight Reveals the Deep Interior of Mars".23 July 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 31 July 2021.Retrieved6 August2021.
  132. ^"NASA's InSight Enters Safe Mode During Regional Mars Dust Storm".National Areonotics and Space Administration.11 January 2022.Archivedfrom the original on 19 January 2022.Retrieved19 January2022.
  133. ^@NASAJPL (17 May 2022)."@BBCAmos Hey Jonathan, the exact number of quakes detected is 1,313"(Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  134. ^ab"NASA InSight's 'Mole' Ends Its Journey on Mars".Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 14 January 2021.Archivedfrom the original on 15 January 2021.Retrieved15 January2021.
  135. ^"NASA Retires InSight Mars Lander Mission After Years of Science".NASA. 21 December 2021.Retrieved3 April2024.
  136. ^Andrew Good; Alana Johnson (3 October 2019)."NASA's Push to Save the Mars InSight Lander's Heat Probe".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved7 October2019.
  137. ^Andrew Good; Alana Johnson (17 October 2019)."Mars InSight's 'Mole' Is Moving Again".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved28 October2019.
  138. ^Andrew Good; Alana Johnson (27 October 2019)."Mars InSight's Mole Has Partially Backed Out of Its Hole".mars.nasa.gov.NASA.Archived fromthe originalon 28 October 2019.Retrieved28 October2019.
  139. ^Amanda Kooser (27 October 2019)."NASA InSight lander 'mole' suffers another Mars misfortune".CNET.Archivedfrom the original on 28 October 2019.Retrieved28 October2019.
  140. ^NASA InSight [@NASAInSight] (13 March 2020)."A bit of good news from #Mars: our new approach of using the robotic arm to push the mole appears to be working! The teams @NASAJPL/@DLR_en are excited to see the images and plan to continue this approach over the next few weeks"(Tweet) – viaTwitter.
  141. ^Meghan Bartels (5 June 2020)."The 'mole' on Mars is finally underground after a push from NASA's InSight lander".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 6 June 2020.Retrieved6 June2020.
  142. ^Mike Wall (9 July 2020)."The 'mole' on Mars from NASA's InSight lander may be stuck again".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 8 July 2020.Retrieved9 July2020.
  143. ^B. Fernando; N. Wójcicka; M. Froment; R. Maguire; S. C. Stähler; et al. (2021)."Listening for the Landing: Seismic Detections of Perseverance's arrival at Mars with InSight".Earth and Space Science.8(4): e2020EA001585.Bibcode:2021E&SS....801585F.doi:10.1029/2020EA001585.hdl:20.500.11937/90005.ISSN2333-5084.
  144. ^Jonathan O’Callaghan (22 December 2020)."NASA probe on Mars may feel the ground shake as rovers land in 2021".New Scientist.Archivedfrom the original on 26 January 2021.Retrieved11 February2021.
  145. ^"NASA InSight team announces results from Perseverance's landing on Mars".University of Oxford.Archivedfrom the original on 23 December 2022.Retrieved23 December2022.
  146. ^Tilman Spohn (10 August 2020)."Mars InSight mission: The Mole is 'in' and the 'finishing touches' are 'in sight'".DLR Blog.Archivedfrom the original on 3 September 2020.Retrieved7 September2020.
  147. ^Mike Wall (12 May 2015)."NASA Wants New Rocket Rides for Tiny CubeSats".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 15 June 2018.Retrieved13 May2015.
  148. ^James Dean (16 May 2015)."NASA seeks launchers for smallest satellites".Florida Today.Archivedfrom the original on 5 September 2015.Retrieved16 May2015.
  149. ^Dirk Schulze-Makuch (9 June 2015)."CubeSats to the Rescue?".Smithsonian Air & Space Museum.Retrieved9 June2015.
  150. ^"Mars Cube One (MarCO)".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved9 December2018.
  151. ^Douglas Messier (27 May 2015)."Two Tiny 'CubeSats' Will Watch 2016 Mars Landing".Space.Archivedfrom the original on 16 November 2018.Retrieved27 May2015.
  152. ^Sami Asmar; Steve Matousek (20 November 2014).Mars Cube One (MarCO) – The First Planetary CubeSat Mission(PDF).NASA/JPL.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 25 January 2017.Retrieved27 May2015.
  153. ^Andrew Good; JoAnna Wendel (5 February 2019)."The MarCO Mission Comes to an End".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Retrieved27 February2020.
  154. ^"NASA's first image of Mars from a CubeSat".Science Daily.18 October 2018.Archivedfrom the original on 28 November 2018.Retrieved22 October2018.
  155. ^"VACCO delivers CubeSat propulsion system for JPL Mars Cube One (MarCO)".VACCO.2017. Archived fromthe originalon 30 August 2018.
  156. ^MarCO – Mars Cube One(PDF).NASA/JPL.2015.Archived(PDF)from the original on 11 May 2021.Retrieved28 September2016.
  157. ^ab"InSight: People".insight.jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Archived fromthe originalon 3 March 2012.Retrieved2 December2011.
  158. ^"JPL Science Division: People – Bruce Banerdt".science.jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.Archived fromthe originalon 25 May 2018.Retrieved2 December2011.
  159. ^"JPL Science Division: People – Sue Smrekar".NASA/JPL.Archivedfrom the original on 25 May 2018.Retrieved2 December2011.
  160. ^David Szondy (7 November 2017)."NASA probe to carry over 2.4 million names to Mars".New Atlas.Archivedfrom the original on 27 November 2018.Retrieved8 January2018.
  161. ^Cassandra Santiago; Saeed Ahmed (1 November 2017)."Today's the last day to get your boarding pass to Mars".CNN.Archivedfrom the original on 18 September 2018.Retrieved8 January2018.
  162. ^abc"Names Chip Placed on InSight Lander Deck".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.17 December 2015.Retrieved4 March2018.
  163. ^ab"Second Names Chip is Placed on InSight".jpl.nasa.gov.NASA/JPL.24 January 2018.Retrieved4 March2018.
  164. ^"Names-to-Mars Chip for InSight Spacecraft".science.nasa.gov.NASA.Retrieved5 June2020.

External links[edit]

  • InSightNASA – InSight Mission
  • InSightNASA – InSight Raw Images
  • InSightNASA – (video/03:31; 18 November 2018; Details)
  • InSightNASA – (video/01:38; 26 November 2018; Landing)
  • InSightNASA – (video/01:39; 1 December 2018; Wind Sounds)
  • InSightNASA – (video/02:48; 19 July 2019; MarsQuakes)
  • Mars Weather:InSight