Killer toy
Akiller toyis astock characterinhorror fiction.They include toys, such asdollsandventriloquist dummies,that come to life and seek to kill or otherwise carry out violence. The killer toy subverts the associations of childhood with innocence and lack of agency while invoking theuncannynature of a lifelike toy. Killer toy fiction often invokes ideas of companionship and the corruption of children, sometimes taking place indysfunctionalorsingle parenthomes. They have historically been associated withoccultismandspirit possession,thoughartificial intelligencebecame more common in later works.
The killer toy most commonly appears in film, where it dates back toDead of Night(1945) and expands on earlier films such asThe Great Gabbo(1929) andThe Devil-Doll(1936). These early examples primarily featured ventriloquist dummies, with works featuring killer dolls developing in the 1960s through the 1980s. The genre of killer toy fiction was popularized byChild's Play(1988) and its killer dollChucky,which has become widely recognized as a horror icon in popular culture. Killer toy fiction has remained prevalent in horror, and other popular killer doll franchises have been created since then, includingPuppet MasterandThe Conjuring.
History
[edit]Precursors and ventriloquist dummies
[edit]![A man holds a ventriloquist dummy](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2b/The_Great_Gabbo_%281929%29_cropped_2.jpg/220px-The_Great_Gabbo_%281929%29_cropped_2.jpg)
Nineteenth-century precursors to the killer toy include "The Sandman"(1816) byE. T. A. Hoffmann[1]: 199 andThe Adventures of Pinocchio(1883) byCarlo Collodi,both of which experimented with the idea of a puppet's identity becoming more humanlike.[1]: 203 Many American children's stories in the late 19th century emphasizeddolls,sometimes marketing themselves as being written by the doll. These stories acknowledged the bond between children and dolls and the personification of dolls by children, both of which would be subverted by later killer-toy fiction.[1]: 206
Ventriloquist dummies served as some of the earliest examples of unnatural toys in horror films,[2]being established with "Otto" in the musical dramaThe Great Gabbo(1929).[3]: 55 [4]The dummy was a convenient prop for early film, as it could largely be operated onscreen without any technicalspecial effects.[5]Dead of Night(1945) is the first identified example of a killer dummy in film, establishing its dummy Hugo by building on the ideas inThe Great Gabbo.[1]: 199 [3]: 57 [2]The killer dummy became a stock character in horror over the following decades, with appearances inThe Dummy Talks(1943),Alfred Hitchcock Presents(1957),The Twilight Zone(1962 and 1964), andMagic(1978).[3]: 57 The relationship between the ventriloquist and the dummy influenced later killer toy characters, even as they moved away from strictly psychological elements toward the supernatural.[3]: 55
Killer dolls in the mid-20th century
[edit]The Devil-Doll(1936) developed a predecessor to the killer doll, featuring shrunken humans controlledpsychokinetically.[3]: 56 The Twilight Zoneintroduced Talky Tina, one of the first on-screen killer dolls, in the episode "Living Doll"(1963). This use of the killer doll was contrasted with the idea of adysfunctional family,with the narrator describing the doll as the child's "guardian".[4]This portrayal was inspired by the advent of talking dolls likeChatty Cathyin the 1960s, which allowed for increased characterization and uncanniness of killer toys.[5]
In the 1960s, the trend of ugly and "monstrous" toys began, with toy manufacturers such asAurora Plastics Corporationexpanding from traditional dolls and toys that complied with conceptions of morality at the time. These toys includedmerchandisingbased on popularmonster moviesas well as other "unattractive" toys such as toy insects. By the 1970s, this trend became associated withcountercultureandteenage rebellion,incorporating imagery that would go on to be associated with horror fiction andgoth subculture.[1]: 212–213
Poltergeist(1982) portrayed a killer toy with anevil clowntoy that was possessed while in a supernatural realm. The film demonstrated the clown's agency by having it move whileoffscreenbefore having the child establish his own agency by killing the clown toy in self-defense.[6]: 68 Dolls(1987) introduced the concept of explicitly creating horror through the imagery of childhood manifested by dolls.[7]: 136
Child's Playand contemporary killer toys
[edit]The development ofanimatronicsallowed for more sophisticated killer toy characters beginning in the 1980s.[5]The filmChild's Play(1988) popularized killer toy films and established its killer doll,Chucky,as a defining example of the killer doll in popular culture.[7]: 134 [4][8]: 34 This incarnation of the killer doll incorporated many of the ideas that defined such characters, including the subversion of childhood innocence, the share of agency between the toy and a child, and the emergence of theoccultinto the living world. The film was distinct in the source of its killer toy; rather than an undefined demonic presence, the character of Chucky is created in the physical world from a previously established character.[6]: 71 Child's Playdefined the genre, inspiring numerous successors and other similar films.[7][4]Killer doll films proliferated over the following years, including furtherChild's Playfilms,thePuppet Masterfilm series,Dolly Dearest(1991), andPinocchio's Revenge(1996).[9][10][11]
Saw(2004) modified the idea of the killer toy by portraying its ventriloquist dummy,Billy the Puppet,as a lifeless messenger used bythe film's antagonist.[9]By the 2010s, the killer doll became aclichéof horror stock characters.[12]: 251 The killer doll Annabelle, allegedly based ona real haunted doll,was prominent in the 2010s.[1]: 199 The character was created forThe Conjuring(2013) before receiving a dedicated film series withintheConjuringfranchise.[9]In 2016, fiction anthologistEllen DatlowpublishedThe Doll Collectionas the first book that specifically collected killer toy fiction.[1]: 199
Beginning in the 2010s, killer toy fiction increasingly emphasizedartificial intelligenceover occultism as the cause of killer dolls.[5]TheChild's Playremake(2019) introduced Chucky as a product of technology rather than occultism.[4]M3GAN(2022) incorporated similar themes, inverting the tradition of making a doll look more humanlike by taking a human actress and making her look less humanlike.[5]
Psychological effects
[edit]![A chart lists increasingly realistic representations of humans that correlate with familiarity, where the familiarity dips shortly before reaching full realism and then rises against upon reaching full realism](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Mori_Uncanny_Valley.svg/220px-Mori_Uncanny_Valley.svg.png)
Dolls represent objects that appear corpse-like or both alive and dead, creating a sense of theuncanny.[12]: 249 The uncanny nature of a killer toy creates a strong visual element, allowing for a prominent role in visual media such as film.[12]: 251 Creators of killer toy films invoke theuncanny valley,in which the toy looks realistic enough to be disconcerting without looking realistic enough to look natural.[5]The human mind naturallyseeks out human facesand is more inclined to interpret personality from an object with a recognizable face.[2]Killer toys in film can produce horror by invokinguncertaintybefore revealing the toy's nature with subtle changes or movements to createsuspensewhen it is unclear whether the toy is acting autonomously.[13]
Sigmund Freud's analysis of uncanniness in his essay "The Uncanny" (1919) has informed the phenomenon's role in horror,[12]: 250 and it has regularly been used as a reference for the psychological effects that killer toys have on audiences.[1]: 199 [7]: 134 Freud posited that children do not make the same "distinction between the animate and the inanimate", while adults have an aversion to this blurring of living and non-living due to arepressionof childlike ideas.[5]
Killer toy fiction that featuresartificial intelligencecan invoke an additional sense of horror not present in stories based on occultism. These stories reflect fears that are expressed in real-world discussions about artificial intelligence, providing a more plausible justification for the toy's behavior and creating a villain that could conceivably exist in the real world.[5]They also invoke the uncanny in the toy's personality as well as its appearance, with artificial intelligence providing it with a nearly human demeanor.[2]
Themes
[edit]Killer toys feature prominently in contemporaryGothic fiction.[1]: 196 [14]They are most commonly established as a type of occultism orspirit possessionin which a toy is inhabited by ademon.[6]: 66 The killer toy can be contrasted with stories in which friendly toys come to life, such asThe Adventures of Pinocchio(1883)[1]: 202 andToy Story(1995),[6]: 59 as well as withscience fictionstories ofandroidsandautomatons.[1]: 203 In popular consciousness, killer toys may also be associated with other uncanny humanlike constructs, such asgolems,mannequins,scarecrows,andstatues.[12]: 249
Killer toys subvert the traditional association of childhood with innocence and dependence,[6]: 59–60 [3]: 56 to the point that the doll has become a shorthand for childhood in the horror genre.[7]: 134 The image of the toy accentuates this theme, conflating the childish appearance of a doll with gratuitously violent and profane behavior.[8]: 38 The threat of a killer toy includes both the threat of physical harm and the loss of innocence.[3]: 58 The climax of killer toy fiction often involves a child killing or destroying the killer toy, granting agency to the child and completing a "cycle" of violence that exists between the toy and the child.[6]: 73
Killer toys invoke parental fears that children may become corrupted or that a parent may accidentally provide them with a negative influence.[3]: 56 [4]Stories about killer toys often involve homes with asingle parentand anonly child,allowing for the killer toy to fulfill an emotional role for a lonely child.[4]In these cases, the child character may develop an attachment to the toy,[1]: 196 reminiscent of real-lifeprojectionof children's identities onto dolls.[1]: 207 The toy may also be dependent on the child to carry out its violence, creating a system ofcodependencyand further blurring the individual identities of the child and the toy.[1]: 196
The killer toy may also be used as a criticism of adulthood andconsumerism,particularly in how these concepts interact with children.[7]: 134 [8]: 39 Under this interpretation, the toy can be seen as carrying out revenge on adults as a proxy of the child.[8]: 39 Feminine portrayals of killer toys rarely differ from masculine portrayals, with the focus typically being on innocence and monstrosity rather than sexuality.[15]One practical consideration in killer toy films is the need to convince a viewer that the toy is a legitimate physical threat to its victims. Due to the small size of most toys, killer toys are often depicted as using creative or sudden attacks that do not provide an opportunity for self-defense.[13]
Killer ventriloquist dummies invoke additional symbolic meanings by imbuing life into a toy that already appears to be living and serves as an extension of an already living person,[6]: 69 and this connection between the puppeteer and the puppet can invoke the idea of an evildoppelgänger.[3]: 59 The puppeteer has been recognized as a symbol for the extension of an identity since ancient times,[3]: 59 and the merging of identities between the puppeteer and the puppet has influenced the killer toy character beyond its use with ventriloquist dummies.[3]: 55 Dummies also reinforce the elements of childhood found in killer toy fiction due to their small stature and the childlike behavior of sitting on the ventriloquist's lap.[6]: 69
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^abcdefghijklmnLu, Chifen (September 1, 2019). "Uncanny Dolls and Bad Children in Contemporary Gothic Narratives".Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies.45(2): 195–222.doi:10.6240/concentric.lit.201909_45(2).0008.
- ^abcdMcCluskey, Megan (January 6, 2023)."The History of Creepy Dolls Like 'M3GAN'".Time.Archivedfrom the original on January 6, 2023.RetrievedMarch 16,2023.
- ^abcdefghijkStaats, Hans (June 30, 2012)."Reenvisioning The Devil-Doll: Child's Play and the Modern Horror Film".The Irish Journal of Gothic and Horror Studies(11): 54–69.Archivedfrom the original on April 14, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.
- ^abcdefgSchimkowitz, Matt (January 3, 2023)."Still friends to the end: the evolution and endless appeal of killer doll movies".The A.V. Club.Archivedfrom the original on January 3, 2023.
- ^abcdefghFree, David (January 24, 2023)."There's a reason why we find dolls like M3GAN so terrifying".The Sydney Morning Herald.Archivedfrom the original on January 10, 2023.RetrievedMarch 15,2023.
- ^abcdefghKupferman, David W. (2019)."Toy Gory, or the Ontology of Chucky: Childhood and Killer Dolls".In Kupferman, David W.; Gibbons, Andrew (eds.).Childhood, Science Fiction, and Pedagogy: Children Ex Machina.Children: Global Posthumanist Perspectives and Materialist Theories. Springer. pp. 57–75.doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6210-1_4.ISBN978-981-13-6210-1.S2CID150723621.Archivedfrom the original on March 14, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.
- ^abcdefLennard, Dominic W. (2012)."All fun and games…: children's culture in the horror film, from Deep Red (1975) to Child's Play (1988)".Continuum.26(1): 133–142.doi:10.1080/10304312.2012.630142.ISSN1030-4312.S2CID144678490.Archivedfrom the original on April 14, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.
- ^abcdBuckingham, David(1996).Moving Images: Understanding Children's Emotional Responses to Television.Manchester University Press. pp. 34–39.ISBN978-0-7190-4595-0.
- ^abcDobbs, Sarah (August 10, 2017)."A Short History of Creepy Dolls in Movies".Den of Geek.Archivedfrom the original on June 20, 2020.
- ^"Pinocchio's Revenge vs. Dolly Dearest!".Boys, Bears & Scares. May 15, 2015.RetrievedNovember 20,2023.
- ^Cusano, Melissa Rose (August 7, 2022)."Every Killer Toy Movie Ranked From Worst To Best".Screen Rant.RetrievedNovember 20,2023.
- ^abcdeMills, Sandra (2018)."Discussing Dolls: Horror and the Human Double".In Corstorphine, Kevin; Kremmel, Laura R. (eds.).The Palgrave Handbook to Horror Literature.Springer. pp. 249–255.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97406-4_19.ISBN978-3-319-97406-4.Archivedfrom the original on March 14, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.
- ^abKaay, Chris Vander; Kaay, Kathleen Fernandez-Vander (2016).Horror Films by Subgenre: A Viewer's Guide.McFarland. pp. 74–75.ISBN978-0-7864-9837-6.Archivedfrom the original on April 4, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.
- ^Hand, Richard J. (2021)."Reflected Anxieties and Projected Dystopias: Black Mirror, Domestic Media and Dark Fantasy".In Gibson, Margaret; Carden, Clarissa (eds.).The Moral Uncanny in Black Mirror.Springer. p. 27.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47495-9_2.ISBN978-3-030-47495-9.S2CID228910293.Archivedfrom the original on March 16, 2023.RetrievedMarch 16,2023.
- ^Velázquez, Raquel (March 14, 2021)."Deconstructing Feminine and Feminist Fantastic through the Study of Living Dolls".CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture.22(4).doi:10.7771/1481-4374.3720.ISSN1481-4374.S2CID233678220.Archivedfrom the original on March 14, 2023.RetrievedMarch 14,2023.