Jump to content

Longfin mako shark

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Longfin mako shark
CITESAppendix II(CITES)[2]
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Chondrichthyes
Subclass: Elasmobranchii
Subdivision: Selachimorpha
Order: Lamniformes
Family: Lamnidae
Genus: Isurus
Species:
I. paucus
Binomial name
Isurus paucus
Range of the longfin mako shark
Synonyms

Isurus alatusGarrick, 1967 Lamiostoma belyaeviGlückman, 1964 Isurus oxyrinchus(non Rafinesque, 1810) misapplied

Thelongfin mako shark(Isurus paucus) is aspeciesofmackerel sharkin the familyLamnidae,with a probable worldwide distribution intemperateandtropicalwaters. An uncommon species, it is typically lumped together under the name "mako"with its better-known relative, theshortfin mako shark(I. oxyrinchus). The longfin mako is a pelagic species found in moderately deep water, having been reported to a depth of 220 m (720 ft). Growing to a maximum length of 4.3 m (14 ft), the slimmer build and long, broadpectoral finsof this shark suggest that it is a slower and less active swimmer than the shortfin mako.

Longfin mako sharks arepredatorsthat feed on smallschoolingbony fishesandcephalopods.Whether this shark is capable of elevating its body temperature above that of the surrounding water like the other members of its family is uncertain, though it possesses the requisite physiological adaptations. Reproduction in this species isaplacental viviparous,meaning theembryoshatch from eggs inside theuterus.In the later stages of development, the unborn young are fed nonviable eggs by the mother (oophagy). The litter size is typically two, but may be as many as eight. The longfin mako is of limitedcommercial value,as its meat and fins are of lower quality than those of other pelagic sharks; however, it is caught unintentionally in low numbers across its range. TheInternational Union for Conservation of Naturehas assessed this species asendangereddue to its rarity, low reproductive rate, and continuingbycatchmortality. In 2019, alongside the shortfin mako, the IUCN listed the longfin mako as "Endangered".[3][4][5]

Taxonomy and phylogeny[edit]

The original description of the longfin mako was published in 1966 by Cuban marine scientist Darío Guitart-Manday, in the scientific journalPoeyana,based on three adult specimens from theCaribbean Sea.An earliersynonymof this species may beLamiostoma belyaevi,described by Glückman in 1964. However, thetype specimendesignated by Glückman consists of a set offossilteeth that could not be confirmed as belonging to the longfin mako, thus the namepaucustook precedence overbelyaevi,despite being published later.[6]Thespecific epithetpaucusisLatinfor "few", referring to the rarity of this species relative to the shortfin mako.[7]

Thesister speciesrelationship between the longfin and shortfin mako has been confirmed by severalphylogeneticstudies based onmitochondrial DNA.In turn, the closest relative of the two mako sharks is thegreat white shark(Carcharodon carcharias).[8]Fossil teeth belonging to the longfin mako have been recovered from the Muddy Creek marl of the Grange Burn formation, south ofHamilton,Australia, and from Mizumani Group inGifu Prefecture,Japan. Both deposits date to theMiddle MioceneEpoch(15–11 million years ago (mya)).[9][10]The oligo-miocene fossil shark tooth taxonIsurus retroflexusmay be the ancestor to or even conspecific with the Longfin Mako.

Distribution and habitat[edit]

Widely scattered records suggest that the longfin mako shark has a worldwide distribution in tropical and warm-temperate oceans; the extent of its range is difficult to determine due to confusion with the shortfin mako. In theAtlantic Ocean,it is known from theGulf Streamoff theEast Coast of the United States,theCaribbean,and southernBrazilin the west, and from theIberian PeninsulatoGhanain the east, possibly including theMediterranean SeaandCape Verde.In theIndian Ocean,it has been reported from theMozambique Channel.In thePacific Ocean,it occurs offJapanandTaiwan,northeasternAustralia,a number of islands in the Central Pacific northeast ofMicronesia,and southernCalifornia.[6]

An inhabitant of the open ocean, the longfin mako generally remains in the uppermesopelagic zoneduring the day and ascends into the epipelagic zoneat night. Off Cuba, it is most frequently caught at a depth of 110–220 m (360–720 ft) and is rare at depths above 90 m (300 ft). OffNew South Wales,most catches occur at a depth of 50–190 m (160–620 ft), in areas with a surface temperature around 20–24 °C (68–75 °F).[11]

Description[edit]

The longfin mako is the larger of the two mako and the second-largest species in its family (after the great white), reaching upwards of 2.5 m (8.2 ft) in length and weighing over 70 kg (150 lb); females grow larger than males.[12]The largest reported longfin mako was a 4.3-metre-long (14 ft) female caught offPompano Beach,Florida,in February 1984.[11]Large specimens can scale over 200 kg (440 lb).[13]This species has a slim,fusiformshape with a long, pointed snout and large eyes that lacknictitating membranes(protective third eyelids). Twelve to 13 tooth rows occur on either side of the upper jaw and 11–13 tooth rows are on either side of the lower jaw. The teeth are large and knife-shaped, without serrations or secondary cusps; the outermost teeth in the lower jaw protrude prominently from the mouth. Thegill slitsare long and extend onto the top of head.[6][12]

The pectoral fins are as long or longer than the head, with a nearly straight front margin and broad tips. The firstdorsal finis large with a rounded apex, and is placed behind the pectoral fins. The second dorsal andanal finsare tiny. Thecaudal peduncleis expanded laterally into strong keels. Thecaudal finis crescent-shaped, with a small notch near the tip of the upper lobe. Thedermal denticlesare elliptical, longer than wide, with three to seven horizontal ridges leading to a toothed posterior margin. The coloration is dark blue to grayish black above and white below. The unpaired fins are dark except for a white rear margin on the anal fin; the pectoral and pelvic fins are dark above and white below with sharp gray posterior margins. In adults and large juveniles, the area beneath the snout, around the jaw, and the origin of the pectoral fins have dusky mottling.[6][12]

Biology and ecology[edit]

The biology of the longfin mako is little-known; it is somewhat common in the western Atlantic and possibly the central Pacific, while in the eastern Atlantic, it is rare and outnumbered over 1,000-fold by the shortfin mako in fishery landings.[1][6]The longfin mako's slender body and long, broad pectoral fins evoke theoceanic whitetip shark(Carcharhinus longimanus) and theblue shark(Prionace glauca), both slow-cruising sharks of upper oceanic waters. Thismorphologicalsimilarity suggests that the longfin mako is less active than the shortfin mako, one of the fastest and most energetic sharks.[6]Like the other members of its family, this species possessesblood vesselcountercurrent exchangesystems called therete mirabilia(Latin for "wonderful net", singular rete mirabile) in its trunk musculature and around its eyes and brain. This system enables other mackerel sharks to conservemetabolic heatand maintain a higher body temperature than their environments, though whether the longfin mako is capable of the same is uncertain.[6]

The longfin mako has large eyes and is attracted to cyalume sticks (chemical lights), implying that it is a visual hunter. Its diet consists mainly of small, schooling bony fishes and squids. In October 1972, a 3.4-metre-long (11 ft) female with the broken bill from aswordfish(Xiphias gladias) lodged in her abdomen was caught in the northeastern Indian Ocean; whether the shark was preying on swordfish as the shortfin mako does, or encountered the swordfish in some other aggressive context is not known.[6][11]Adult longfin mako have no natural predators except forkiller whales,while young individuals may fall prey to larger sharks.[12]

As in other mackerel sharks, the longfin mako is aplacental viviparous and typically gives birth to two pups at a time (one inside eachuterus), though a 3.3-metre-long (11 ft) female pregnant with eight well-developed embryos was caught in theMona PassagenearPuerto Ricoin January 1983.[11]The developing embryos are oophagous; once they deplete their supply ofyolk,they sustain themselves by consuming large quantities of nonviable eggsovulatedby their mother. No evidence of siblingcannibalismis seen, as in thesand tiger shark(Carcharias taurus). The pups measure 97–120 cm (3.18–3.94 ft) long at birth, relatively larger than the young of the shortfin mako, and have proportionally longer heads and pectoral fins than the adults.[12][14]Capture records off Florida suggest that during the winter, females swim into shallow coastal waters to give birth.[15]Male and female sharks reachsexual maturityat lengths around 2 m (6.6 ft) and 2.5 m (8.2 ft), respectively.[11]

Human interactions[edit]

The longfin mako is caught as bycatch on pelagic longlines

No attacks on humans have been attributed to the longfin mako shark.[6]Nevertheless, its large size and teeth make it potentially dangerous.[7]This shark is caught, generally in low numbers, asbycatchonlonglinesintended fortuna,swordfish, and other pelagic sharks, as well as in anchoredgillnetsand on hook-and-line. The meat is marketed fresh, frozen, or dried and salted, though it is considered to be of poor quality due to its mushy texture. The fins are also considered to be of lower quality for use inshark fin soup,though are valuable enough that captured sharks are oftenfinnedat sea.[1]The carcasses may be processed intoanimal feedandfish meal,while the skin, cartilage, and jaws are also of value.[12][15]

The most significant longfin mako catches are by Japanese tropical longline fisheries, and those sharks occasionally enterTokyofish markets. From 1987 to 1994, United States fisheries reported catches (discarded, as this species is worthless on the North American market) of 2–12 tons per year.[1]Since 1999, retention of this species has been prohibited by the U.S.National Marine Fisheries ServiceFishery Management Plan for Atlantic sharks.[16]Longfin mako were once significant in the Cuban longline fishery, comprising one-sixth of the shark landings from 1971 to 1972; more recent data from this fishery are not available. The IUCN has assessed this species as "Vulnerable" due to its uncommonness, low reproductive rate, and susceptibility to shark fishing gear. It has also been listed under Annex I of theConvention on Migratory SpeciesMigratory Shark Memorandum of Understanding.[17]In the North Atlantic, stocks of the shortfin mako have declined 40% or more since the late 1980s, and concerns exist that populations of the longfin mako are following the same trend.[1]In 2019, along with its relative the shortfin mako, the IUCN listed the longfin mako as "Endangered" due to continuing declines alongside 58 elasmobranch species.[3][4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcdeRigby, C.L.; Barreto, R.; Carlson, J.; Fernando, D.; Fordham, S.; Francis, M.P.; Jabado, R.W.; Liu, K.M.; Marshall, A.; Pacoureau, N.; Romanov, E.; Sherley, R.B.; Winker, H. (2019)."Isurus paucus".IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.2019:e.T60225A3095898.doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-1.RLTS.T60225A3095898.en.Retrieved18 November2021.
  2. ^"Appendices | CITES".cites.org.Retrieved2022-01-14.
  3. ^ab"World's fastest shark endangered, 17 other species almost extinct, conservationists say".Fox News.22 March 2019.Archivedfrom the original on 12 October 2019.Retrieved27 March2019.
  4. ^ab"The IUCN Announced Conservation Status Update on 58 Elasmobranch Species, Including the Shortfin Mako – Ocean for Sharks".Archived fromthe originalon 2019-03-30.Retrieved2019-03-27.
  5. ^"Press".Archivedfrom the original on 2020-02-06.Retrieved2019-03-27.
  6. ^abcdefghiCompagno, L.J.V. (2002).Sharks of the World: An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Shark Species Known to Date (Volume 2).Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. pp. 115–117.ISBN92-5-104543-7.
  7. ^abEbert, D.A. (2003).Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras of California.London: University of California Press. pp. 120–121.ISBN0-520-23484-7.
  8. ^Dosay-Abkulut, M. (2007)."What is the Relationship within the Family Lamnidae?"(PDF).Turkish Journal of Biology.31:109–113. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2016-04-20.Retrieved2016-11-14.
  9. ^Fitzgerald, E. (2004)."A review of the Tertiary fossil Cetacea (Mammalia) localities in Australia"(PDF).Memoirs of Museum Victoria.61(2): 183–208.doi:10.24199/j.mmv.2004.61.12.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2008-08-23.
  10. ^Yabumoto, Y. & Uyeno, T. (1994)."Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic fish faunas of Japan".The Island Arc.3(4): 255–269.Bibcode:1994IsArc...3..255Y.doi:10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00115.x.Archivedfrom the original on 2019-03-30.Retrieved2016-11-14.
  11. ^abcdeMartin, R.A.Biology of the Longfin Mako (Isurus paucus)Archived2019-09-02 at theWayback Machine.ReefQuest Centre for Shark Research. Retrieved on December 25, 2008.
  12. ^abcdefWilson, T. and Ford, T.Biological Profiles: Longfin MakoArchived2019-04-17 at theWayback Machine.Florida Museum of Natural History Ichthyology Department. Retrieved on December 25, 2008.
  13. ^Bustamante, C., Concha, F., Balbontín, F., & Lamilla, J. (2009).Southernmost record of Isurus paucus Gitart Manday, 1966 (Elasmobranchii: Lamnidae) in the southeast Pacific Ocean.Revista de biología marina y oceanografía, 44(2), 523-526.
  14. ^Gilmore, R.G. (May 6, 1983). "Observations on the Embryos of the Longfin Mako,Isurus paucus,and the Bigeye Thresher,Alopias superciliosus".Copeia.1983(2). American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists: 375–382.doi:10.2307/1444380.JSTOR1444380.
  15. ^abFroese, Rainer; Pauly, Daniel (eds.) (2008)."Isurus paucus"inFishBase.December 2008 version.
  16. ^Fowler, S.L.; Cavanagh, R.D.; Camhi, M.; Burgess, G.H.; Cailliet, G.M.; Fordham, S.V.; Simpfendorfer, C.A. & Musick, J.A. (2005).Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras: The Status of the Chondrichthyan Fishes.International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. pp. 106–109.ISBN2-8317-0700-5.
  17. ^Memorandum of Understanding – Migratory SharksArchived2013-04-20 at theWayback Machine.Convention on Migratory Species. Downloaded on February 14, 2012.

External links[edit]