Malankara Church

This article is about the historic Indian church. For the rite employed, seeMalankara Rite.

Malankara Church
Type	Eastern Christian
Classification	Oriental Orthodox
Theology	Miaphysitism
Polity	Episcopal
Metropolitan Bishop	Malankara Metropolitan
Sub-divisions	Syro-Malankara Catholic Church Jacobite Syrian Christian Church Malabar Independent Syrian Church Saint Thomas Anglicans Mar Thoma Syrian Church Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church St. Thomas Evangelical Church of India
Region	Kerala,India
Language	Suriyani Malayalam,Classical Syriac,Malayalam
Liturgy	Antiochian Rite-Liturgy of Saint James
Headquarters	Pazhaya Seminary
Founder	Thomas the Apostleas per tradition.
Origin	52 AD (tradition) 1665
Separated from	Church of the East
Branched from	Saint Thomas Christians
Merged into	Oriental Orthodox Communion

TheMalankara Church,also known asPuthenkur,is the historic unified body ofWest SyriacSaint Thomas Christiandenominations which claim ultimate origins from the missions ofThomas the Apostle.This community, under the leadership ofThoma I,opposed thePadroadoJesuitsas well as thePropagandaCarmelitesof theLatin Church,following the historicalCoonan Cross Oathof 1653. The Malankara Church's divisions and branchings have resulted in present-day Churches that include theJacobite Syrian Christian Church,theMalankara Orthodox Syrian Church,theMalankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church,theMalabar Independent Syrian Church,theSyro-Malankara Catholic Church,theSaint Thomas Anglicansof theChurch of South Indiaand theSt. Thomas Evangelical Church of India.

Early history of Christianity in India

Further information:Saint Thomas Christians

Ecclesiastical Communion

Further information:Malankara-Persian ecclesiastical relations

Historically, Malabar traded frequently with the nations of theMiddle East,and traders fromEgypt,Persia,and theLevantfrequently visited Malabar forspices.These groups included Arabs, Jews and also Christians, and the Christians who visited here maintained contact with the Malankara Church. As such the Church in India was in ecclesiastical communion with theChurch of the East,otherwise called the Persian church. The Malankara Church was headed by a Metropolitan consecrated from the Persian Church and ordinary administration of the Church was vested upon a local, dynastic archdeacon, who was referred to as the Head of the Malankara Christian community. (Archdeaconis the highest rank for a cleric in the Church of the East after the rank of bishop.)

Cheppeds: Collection of deeds on copper plates

The Rulers ofKerala,in appreciation for their assistance, gave to the Malankara Nazranis, three deeds on copper plates. They gave the Nasranis various rights and privileges which were written on copper plates. These are known as Cheppeds, Royal Grants, Sasanam etc.

• Thomas of Cana copper plates:Dated between 345 and 811 AD, Thomas of Cana (Knai Thoma), a merchant from Persian Mesopotamia, was granted a deed of socio-economic rights known today as theThomas of Cana copper platesby theCheraDynasty. Thoma's plates were recorded and translated in the 16th and 17th century by Portuguese officials. The plates are later noted to have disappeared while in the possession of the Portuguese and remain lost.
• Tharissa palli Deed I:In 849 AD, Perumal Sthanu Ravi Gupta (844–885) gave a deed to Isodatta Virai for Tharissa Palli (church) at Curakkeni Kollam. According to historians, this is the first deed in Kerala that gives the exact date.
• Tharissa palli Deed II:Continuation of the above, given after 849 AD.
• Iravi Corttan Deed:In 1225 AD, Sri Vira Raghava Chakravarti gave a deed to Iravi Corttan (Eravi Karthan) of Mahadevarpattanam in 774. TwoBrahminfamilies are witness to this deed showing that Brahmins were in Kerala by the 8th century.

These plates detail privileges awarded to the community by the then rulers. These influenced the development of the social structure in Kerala and privileges, rules for the communities. These are considered as one of the most important legal documents in the history ofKerala. Three of these are still in theOrthodox Theological Seminary(Old Seminary) in Kottayam and two are at the Mar Thoma Church Headquarters in Tiruvalla.

Archdeacons

The position ofarchdeacon–the highest for clergy who are not abishop–had great importance in the church of India in the centuries leading up to the formation of an independent Malankara Church. Though technically subordinate to the metropolitan, the archdeacon wielded great ecclesiastical and secular power, to the extent that he was considered the secular leader of the community and served as effective head of the Indian Church in times when the province was absent a bishop. Unlike the metropolitan, who was evidently always an East Syriac sent by the patriarch, the archdeacon was a native Saint Thomas Christian. In the documented period, the position was evidently hereditary, belonging to thePakalomattamfamily, who claimed a privileged connection to Thomas the Apostle.

Details on the archidiaconate prior to the arrival of the Portuguese are elusive, but PatriarchTimothy I(780–823) called the Archdeacon of India the "head of the faithful in India", implying an elevated status by at least that time.In the recorded period of its history, the office of archdeacon was substantially different in India than in the rest of the Church of the East or other Christian churches. In the broader Church of the East, each bishop was attended by an archdeacon, but in India, there was only ever one archdeacon, even when the province had multiple bishops serving it.

Following the collapse of the Church of the East's hierarchy in most of Asia in the 14th century, India was effectively cut off from the church's heartland in Mesopotamia and formal contact was severed. By the late 15th century India had had no metropolitan for several generations, and the authority traditionally associated with him had been vested in the archdeacon.In 1491, the archdeacon sent envoys to the Patriarch of the Church of the East, as well as to theCopticPope of Alexandriaand to theSyriac Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch,requesting a new bishop for India. The Patriarch of the Church of the EastShemʿon IV Basidiresponded by consecrating two bishops, Thoma and Yuhanon, and dispatching them to India.These bishops helped rebuild the ecclesiastical infrastructure and reestablish fraternal ties with the patriarchate, but the years of separation had greatly affected the structure of the Indian church. Though receiving utmost respect, the metropolitan was treated as the spiritual authority in his own diocese; the Archdeacon was firmly established as the real power in the Malankara community.

Arrival of the Portuguese

See also:Portuguese India

Further information:Synod of Diamper

At the time thePortuguesearrived in India in 1498, the Saint Thomas Christians were in a difficult position. Though prosperous owing to their large stake in thespice tradeand protected by a formidable militia, the tumultuous political climate of the time had placed the small community under pressure from the forces of the powerfulrajasofCalicut,Cochin,and the various smaller kingdoms in the area. When the Portuguese underVasco da Gamaarrived on the South Indian coast, the leaders of the Saint Thomas community greeted them and proffered a formal alliance to their fellow Christians.The Portuguese, who had keen interest in implanting themselves in the spice trade and in expanding the domain of their bellicose form of Christianity, jumped at this opportunity.

The Portuguese brought to India a particularly militant brand of Christianity, the product of several centuries of struggle during theReconquista,which they hoped to spread across the world.Facilitating this objective was thePadroado Real,a series of treaties and decrees in which thePopeconferred upon the Portuguese government certain authority in ecclesiastical matters in the foreign territories they conquered.Upon reaching India the Portuguese quickly ensconced themselves inGoaand established a church hierarchy; soon they set themselves to bringing the native Christians under their dominion. Towards this goal, the colonial establishment felt it necessary to conduct the Saint Thomas Christians fully into theLatin Church,both in bringing them into conformity with Latin church customs and in subjecting them to the authority of theArchbishop of Goa.

Following the death of Metropolitan Mar Jacob in 1552, the Portuguese became more aggressive in their efforts to subjugate the Saint Thomas Christians.Protests on the part of the natives were frustrated by events back in the Church of the East's Mesopotamian heartland, which left them devoid of consistent leadership. In 1552, the year of Jacob's death, aschism in the Church of the Eastresulted in there being two rival patriarchates, one of which entered into communion with theCatholic Church,and the other of which remained independent. At different times both patriarchs sent bishops to India, but the Portuguese were consistently able to outmaneuver the newcomers or else convert them to Latin Catholicism outright.In 1575 the Padroado declared that neither patriarch could appoint prelates to the community without Portuguese consent, thereby cutting the Thomas Christians off from their hierarchy.

By 1599 the last Metropolitan, Abraham, had died, and the Archbishop of Goa,Aleixo de Menezes,had secured the submission of the young Archdeacon George, the highest remaining representative of the native church hierarchy.That year Menezes convened theSynod of Diamper,which instituted a number of structural and liturgical reforms to the Indian church. At the synod, the parishes were brought directly under the Archbishop's authority, certain "superstitious" customs were anathematized, and the traditional variant of theEast Syriac Rite,was purged of elements unacceptable by the Latin standards.Though the Saint Thomas Christians were now formally part of the Catholic Church, the conduct of the Portuguese over the next decades fueled resentment in parts of the community, ultimately leading to open resistance.

Coonan Cross and the independent church

See also:Coonan Cross Oath

Over the next several decades, tensions seethed between the Latin prelates and what remained of the native hierarchy. This came to a head in 1641 with the ascension of two new protagonists on either side of the contention: Francis Garcia, the new Archbishop of Kodungalloor, and ArchdeaconThomas,the nephew and successor to Archdeacon George.In 1652, the escalating situation was further complicated by the arrival in India of a mysterious figure namedAhatallah.

Ahatallah arrived inMylaporein 1652, claiming to be the rightfulPatriarch of Antiochwho had been sent by the Catholic pope to serve as "Patriarch of the Whole of India and of China".Ahatallah's true biography is obscure, but some details have been established. He appears to have been aSyriac OrthodoxBishop of Damascus who converted to Catholicism and went to Rome in 1632. He then returned to Syria in order to bring the Syriac Orthodox PatriarchIgnatius Hidayat Allahinto communion with Rome. He had not accomplished this by the time Hidayat Allah died in 1639, after which point Ahatallah began claiming he was Hidayat Allah's rightful successor. In 1646, he was inEgyptat the court of theCoptic PopeMark VI,who dispatched him to India in 1652, evidently in response to a request for aid from Archdeacon Thomas. Reckoning him an impostor, the Portuguese arrested him, but allowed him to meet with members of the Saint Thomas Christian clergy, whom he impressed greatly. The Portuguese put him on a ship bound for Cochin and Goa, and Archdeacon Thomas led his militia to Cochin demanding to meet with the Patriarch. The Portuguese refused, asserting that he was a dangerous invader and that the ship had already sailed on to Goa.

Ahatallah was never heard from again in India, and rumours soon spread that Archbishop Garcia had disposed of him before he ever reached Goa.Contemporary accounts allege that he was drowned in Cochin harbour, or even that the Portuguese burned him at the stake.In reality, it appears that Ahatallah did in fact reach Goa, whence he was sent on to Europe, but evidently died inParisbefore reaching Rome, where his case was to be heard.In any event, Garcia's dismissive response to the Saint Thomas Christians' appeals only embittered the community further.

This was the last straw for the Saint Thomas Christians, and in 1653, Thomas and representatives of the community met at the Church of Our Lady inMattancherryto take bold action. In a great ceremony before a crucifix and lighted candles, they swore a solemn oath that they would never obey Garcia or the Portuguese again, and that they accepted only the Archdeacon as their shepherd.The Malankara Church and all its successor churches regard this declaration, known as theCoonan Cross Oath.

Later development

Thoma III,3rd Malankara Metropolitan

The oppressive rule of the Portuguese padroado provoked a violent reaction on the part of the indigenous Christian community. The first solemn protest took place in 1653, known as the Coonan Kurishu Satyam (Coonan Cross Oath). Under the leadership of Archdeacon Thoma, theSt. Thomas Christianspublicly took an oath inMattancherry,Cochin, that they would not obey the Portuguese Catholic bishops and theJesuitmissionaries. Unfortunately there was no Metropolitan present in the Malankara Church at that time. Hence in the same year, at Alangad, Archdeacon Thoma was ordained, by the laying on of hands of twelve priests, as the first known indigenous Metropolitan of Kerala, under the name Thoma I. The Portuguese missionaries attempted reconciliation with Saint Thomas Christians but this was not successful. Later Pope Alexander VII sent the Syrian bishop Joseph Sebastiani at the head of a Carmelite delegation who succeeded in convincing the majority of Saint Thomas Christians, includingPalliveettil Chandy KathanarandKadavil Chandy Kathanar.The Catholic faction constantly challenged the legitimacy of the consecration of the archdeacon as Metropolitan by priests. The faction was led by Palliveettil Chandy, cousin ofThoma I,who was consecrated as a bishop in 1663 by Carmelite missionaries of theCatholic Church.He was supported by other prominent Saint Thomas Christian leaders includingKadavil ChandyKathanar and Vengūr Givargis Kathanar. This made it essential to rectify the illegitimacy of the consecration of Archdeacon as Metropolitan. Episcopal consecration of Thoma I as a bishop was regularized in 1665 byGregorios Abdal JaleelJerusalem Bishop of the Syriac Orthodox Church. This led to the first permanent split in the Saint Thomas Christian community. Thereafter, the faction affiliated with the Catholic Church under Parambil Mar Chandy was designated thePazhayakoottukar,or "Old Allegiance", while the branch affiliated with Mar Thoma was called thePuthenkoottukar,or "New Allegiance".These appellations have been somewhat controversial since both groups considered themselves the true heirs to the Saint Thomas tradition.

Thoma I with 32 churches (out of a total of 116) and their congregations were the body from which the Malankara Syrian Puthenkūr Churches originated. In 1665, Gregorios Abdul Jaleel, a bishop sent by the Syriac Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch, arrived in India, and the Saint Thomas Christians under the leadership of the Archdeacon welcomed him.The Gregorios Abdal Jaleel regularised the consecration of Archdeacon as Metropolitan of the Syriac Orthodox Church as per the apostolic standards of Kaiveppu (traditional legitimate way of laying hands by a valid Bishop). The 18th century saw the gradual introduction of West Syriac liturgy and script to the Malabar Coast, a process that continued through the 19th century.

The Syriac Orthodox Communion

Mor Osthatheos Sleebo

The arrival of Mar Gregorios in 1665, marked the introduction ofOriental Orthodoxyin India through the Malankara Church and validbishopricofSyriac Orthodox Churchin India.

Letter of Patriarch Ignatios Abdal-Masih I to the faithful of Malabar

After greeting you with a holy kiss, let that, which we are relating to each one of you, be known to you, o brethren, my beloved, namely that the apostolate to you of Gregorios, that is, the venerable Abdal-Jaleel, was from the divine Providence, because you were not able to appoint and to consecrate for yourselves venerable bishops. Afterwards, you were in need and have already sent three times [envoys to us]. And we yielded [to your request] out of the love of Christ, and have sent to you our Fathers, our Father Mor Baselios, that is, Patriarch Yaldo, together with those who accompany him, not in order that he stays with you, but in order to fill your need and to consecrate for you venerable [bishops] and metropolitans. And after having fulfilled your requests, send them back to us. We do not want him to come to us after a long period, but after three years.

MS Samanvaya Syr 18

Letter fromDionysious Punnathara(a nineteenth century prelate of theMalankara Syrian Church) addressed to the head of the AnglicanChurch Missionary Society,as translated from the Syriac original:

In the Name of the Eternal and Necessary Existence, the Almighty.
Mar Dionysius, Metropolitan of the Jacobite-Syrians in Malabar, subject to the authority of our Father, Mar Ignatius, Patriarch, who presides in the Apostolic See of Antioch of Syria, beloved of the Messiah. Love from Christ, and from the People of all the Churches, to Lord Gambier, the illustrious, honour able, and renowned President...
We, who are called Syrian-Jacobites, and reside in the land of Malabar, even from the times of Mar Thomas, the holy Apostle, until the wall of Cochin was taken in the reign of King Purgis, kept the True Faith according to the manner of the Syrian Jacobites, of real glory, without division or confusion. But, by the power of the Franks, our Jacobite Syrian Fathers and Leaders were prohibited from coming from Antioch: and, because we had no Leader and Head, we were like Sheep without a Shepherd; or, like Orphans and Widows, oppressed in spirit, without support or help.
In the year of our Lord 1653, came our Spiritual Father, Mar Ignatius, the Patriarch, from Antioch to Malabar....
Again, in the year of our Lord 1753, came to us some holy Jacobite Syrian Fathers from Antioch, who turned us to our true ancient faith, and set up a High Priest for us.

In 1912, a Catholicate was instituted in Malankara by the Syriac orthodoxPatriarchAbdul Masih,thereby starting a century of legal proceedings between factions of the church which supported the Catholicate, and those who opposed it on behalf of the claims that, the Abdul Masih was excommunicated, LaterSyriac Orthodox Churchestablished CanonicalCatholicate / Maphrianate of the East in Indiarenamed toCatholicos of Indiaof theJacobite Syriac Orthodox Church.

Further history

History of the Saint Thomas Christians' divisions

In 1665,Gregorios Abdul Jaleel,sent from Patriarch Ignatius Abdulmasih I introduced West Syriac Rite in India.By 1809, the Jacobite Syrians fully incorporated theAntiochian Syriac Rite liturgyafter the assembly of parish representatives met at Kandanad, Kerala and resolved to fully implement the move to West Syriac Rite through the declarationKandanad Padiyola,which had been already partially implemented by the same assembly in 1789 at Puthiyacavu.

The church of Saint Thomas Christians constituted a single church until the 16th century. It formed the community of the East SyriacEccesiastical Province of India.Later some rifts erupted in their church due to the colonization of India by the Portuguese padroado Latin Catholic missionaries. After theSynod of Diamper,their Church was forcibly merged into the Latin Catholic Church and their eccesiastical province of India was downgraded to become a suffragan see of the newly erectedArchdiocese of Goa,administered byLatin Padroado.Thus, theArchdiocese of Cranganore,the most ancient episcopal see in India was deprived of its all-India jurisdiction and was made an inferior to the Archdiocese of Goa, that was a product of the Portuguese colonialism in the sixteenth century. Although the metropolitan status was soon restored, the colonial subjugation continued. In 1653, as a move for independence, the Saint Thomas Christians made theCoonan Cross Oathagainst the oppressive Latin Catholic hierarchy. The Pope responded to the issue by sendingPropagandaCarmelite missionaries, assigning them the responsibility for reunification. This eventually culminated in the gradualschismamong the Christians, with one faction reuniting with the Catholic Church and the other faction remaining steadfast against the Latin missionaries. The former faction came to known asPaḻayakūrand latter, led byThoma I,came to be known asPuthenkūr.Thoma I was regularised as a canonical bishop in 1665 by Archbishop Gregorios Abdul Jaleel of theSyriac Orthodox Churchand thus thePuthenkūr,gradually adopted theMiaphysitechristologyand affiliated themselves to theOriental Orthodox Communion.In this process, the traditionalPersian liturgyof the erstwhileChurch of the Eastin India was replaced among them and this transformation was completed by the 19th century. ThePaḻayakūrconstitute the contemporarySyro-Malabar Churchand theChaldean Syrian Church.The former is an Eastern Catholic Church and it forms the major part of thePazhayakūrwhile the latter is in communion with theAssyrian Church of the Eastsince the late 19th century. The Chaldean Syrian Church thus represents the continuation of the traditional pre-Portuguese Church of the East in India.

SthathiconofKadavil Paulose Mar Athanasius,1877

Disputes and Court Cases

Later, a number of splits happened among the Jacobite Syrians due to the influence of foreign missionaries and internal conflicts. In 1772,Baselios Shakrallah,a Syriac Orthodoxmaphrian,consecratedKattumangatt Abraham Mar Koorilosas the Metropolitan againstDionysius I.Abraham Mar Koorilos Iled the faction that eventually became theMalabar Independent Syrian Church.

From 1816 onwards, the AnglicanChurch Mission Societymissionaries helped the Malankara Church, through their Help Mission.But on 16 January 1836, MetropolitanDionysius IV of Cheppad,convened a Synod atMavelikara,in protest against the interference of Anglicans in the affairs of the Malankara Church. There it was declared that Malankara Church would be subject to Syrian traditions and theSyriac Orthodox Patriarch of Antioch.The declaration resulted in the separation of the CMS missionaries from the communion with the Malankara Church.However, a minority from the Malankara Church, who were in favour of theReformedideologies of the missionaries, stood along with them and joined theAnglican Church.TheseSaint Thomas Anglicansbecame part of theChurch of South India,after theIndian independencein 1947. So they are also called CSI Syrian Christians.

In the 19th century, a reform movement inspired by British missionaries led to the formation of the independentMar Thoma Syrian Churchunder the leadership of the then Malankara Metropolitan,Mathews Mar Athanasius.Meanwhile, the majority of the members of the church, resisted the movement and strengthened their affiliation to the Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch at the Mulanthuruthy Synod in 1876.They were led byPulikkootil Joseph Mar Dionysios,who was consecrated by PatriarchIgnatius Peter III.In 1875, PatriarchIgnatius Peter IVexcommunicatedMathews Athanasius,Thomas Athanasiusand their followers from the Malankara Church.The British colonial administration abstained from extending their crucial endorsement to any one faction, thereby disengaging themselves from local church matters. Thus, the rival parties had to settle their disputes, entirely by means of court litigations.

Dionysious Vand his supporters filed a case on 4 March 1879. (Case O.S. No. 439 of 1054) demanding the possession of the seminary and the control of assets of the Church. Thomas Athanasius was then the Metropolitan.

During the course of this litigation (1879–1889), answering a question Thomas Athanasius Metropolitan said,

The Episcopal throne of Patriarch is the throne of St. Peter, while the throne of Malankara Church is that of St. Thomas. Malankara Church is as old as the Church in Antioch, equal in status, and both are independent.

A meeting was convened by the Maharaja ofTravancore,before the final verdict was given, Athanasius testified that,

Malankara Church was never under any foreign rule and that he was unwilling to move away from the teachings or give the authority and the Church possessions to a foreign Patriarch.

The final verdict which came on 12 July 1889 from the Royal Court of Travancore, upheld the conservative position on theSyriac Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch,as being the only competent ecclesiastical authority historically authorized to ordain and appoint bishops to theMalankara Metropolitan.The ruling declaredDionysious Vthe rightful Malankara Metropolitan owing to the acceptance by the vast majority of Malankara Christians and appointment bySyriac Orthodox Patriarchate of Antiochwherefrom he received direct consecration.The judgement also dismissed all claims of the reformists and their leader Thomas Athanasius to the Metropolitanate or its assets.They separated and established theReformedMar Thoma Syrian Church.In the 1950s, a faction that demanded further conformity to Protestant doctrines, surfaced within the Mar Thoma Syrian Church. In 1961, they split and formed theSt. Thomas Evangelical Church of India.

However this church underwent a further split in 1912 due to internal disputes and the question of autonomy.The faction that supported the Patriarch of Antioch was known asBava Kakshi(Patriarch faction) and those who supported theMalankara Metropolitancame to be calledMethran Kakshi(bishop faction). The former came to be known as theJacobite Syrian Christian Church,which got incorporated into an arch-diocese of the Syriac Orthodox Church later and the latter, initially known as the Malankara Yakkobaya Orthodox Syrian Church, adopted the titleMalankara Orthodox Syrian Church.On 3 July 2017, the Supreme Court of India passed a judgement in favour of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church on the question of who is the legitimate Malankara Metropolitan and who has the authority to manage the affairs of the Malankara Church and its properties. It equivocally declared the 1934 Constitution of the Malankara Church a valid document to administer the church and ended the legal dispute among the two factions.

Modern descendants

The modern-day descendants of the Malankara Church are:

1. Syro-Malankara Catholic Church:an autonomoussui iurisEastern Catholicparticular church,infull communionwith theHoly Seeand the worldwideCatholic Church,with self-governance under theCode of Canons of the Eastern Churches.
2. Jacobite Syrian Christian Church(JSCC): an arch-diocese of theSyriac Orthodox Churchunder the local jurisdiction of amaphrian and catholicosas known asCatholicos of India.
3. Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church(MOSC): an Autonomous and Autocephalous Oriental Orthodox Church.headed by theCatholicos of the EastandMalankara Metropolitanenthroned on the apostolic throne ofSaint Thomas.
4. Saint Thomas Anglicans:community of former Malankara Syrian Christians who belong to theAnglican Communion,as members of theChurch of South India.The CSI is infull communionwith the Mar Thoma Syrian Church.
5. Malankara Mar Thoma Syrian Church(MTC): an Independent and AutonomousOriental Protestantmalankarachurch under the jurisdiction of Marthoma Metropolitan, seated on the Apostolic Throne of Saint Thomas the apostle. The Church also shares communion with theChurch of Englandandits communion.
6. Malabar Independent Syrian Church:an Autonomous and Autocephalous church under the jurisdiction of its own independent Metropolitan, also sharing an communion with the Church of England and its communion.
7. St. Thomas Evangelical Church of India:an autonomousEastern,EvangelicalandEpiscopalchurch, headed by a presiding bishop.

Gallery

• 
  Kottayam Cheriapally,1835 pencil drawing
• 
  Baptismal fontused in the Malankara Churches
• 
  Malankara Syrian Church Sunday School Text Book

See also

• Pazhaya SeminaryOrthodox Theological Seminary, Kottayam
• Malankara Metropolitan
• List of Malankara Metropolitans

References

• Baum, Wilhelm;Winkler, Dietmar W.(2003).The Church of the East: A Concise History.London-New York: Routledge-Curzon.ISBN9781134430192.
• Chaput, Pascale (1999)."La Double identité des chrétiens keralais: confessions et castes chrétiennes au Kerala (Inde du Sud) / The Double Identity of Kerala Christians: Confessions and Christian Castes (South India)".Archives des sciences sociales des religions.106:5–23.doi:10.3406/assr.1999.1084.
• Fernando, Leonard; Gispert-Sauch, G. (2004).Christianity in India: Two Thousand Years of Faith.Viking.
• Frykenberg, Eric (2008).Christianity in India: from Beginnings to the Present.Oxford.ISBN0-19-826377-5.
• Gregorios, Paulos; Roberson, Ronald G. (2008)."Syrian Orthodox Churches in India".In Fahlbusch, Erwin; Lochman, Jan Milič; Mbiti, John; Pelikan, Jaroslav; Vischer, Lukas (eds.).The Encyclopedia of Christianity.Vol. 5. William B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 285–286.ISBN978-0-8028-2417-2.Retrieved29 March2010.
• Hough, James (1893) "The History of Christianity in India".
• T. K. Joseph (1955).Six St. Thomases of South India.University of California.
• MacKenzie, Gordon Thomson (1901).Christianity in Travancore.Travancore Government Press. p. 28.ISBN9781230341651.
• Menachery, G (1973)The St. Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India,Ed. George Menachery, B.N.K. Press, vol. 2,ISBN81-87132-06-X,Lib. Cong. Cat. Card. No. 73-905568; B.N.K. Press
• Menachery, G (ed); (1998) "The Indian Church History Classics", Vol.I,The Nazranies,Ollur, 1998.ISBN81-87133-05-8
• Menachery, G (2010)The St. Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India,Ed. George Menachery, Ollur, vol. 3,ISBN81-87132-06-X,Lib. Cong. Cat. Card. No. 73-905568; 680306 India
• Menachery, G (2012) "India's Christian Heritage" The Church History Association of India, Ed. Oberland Snaitang, George Menachery, Dharmaram College, Bangalore
• Neill, Stephen(2002).A History of Christianity in India: 1707–1858.Cambridge University Press.ISBN0521893321.Retrieved18 February2016.
• Neill, Stephen(2004).A History of Christianity in India: The Beginnings to AD 1707.Cambridge University Press.ISBN0-521-54885-3.Retrieved20 April2010.
• Perczel, István(2006). Jacob Thekeparampil; Geevarghese Panicker; Abraham Kalakudi (eds.)."Have the flames of Diamper destroyed all the old manuscripts of the Saint Thomas Christians?".The Harp.20.Gorgias Press.ISBN9781611436549.
• Puthiakunnel, Thomas (1973) "Jewish colonies of India paved the way for St. Thomas",The Saint Thomas Christian Encyclopedia of India,ed. George Menachery, Vol. II., Trichur.
• Vadakkekara, Benedict (2007).Origin of Christianity in India: a Historiographical Critique.Media House Delhi.