Jump to content

Man'yōshū

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromManyoshu)
Two vertical lines of Japanese text written in calligraphy, read right to left. The first character has smaller, simpler red characters written around it.
A replica of aMan'yōshūpoemNo.8, byNukata no Ōkimi

TheMan'yōshū(Vạn diệp tập,pronounced[maɰ̃joꜜːɕɯː];literally "Collection of Ten Thousand Leaves" )[a][1]is the oldest extant collection ofJapanesewaka(poetry inClassical Japanese),[b]compiled sometime after AD 759 during theNara period.The anthology is one of the most revered of Japan's poetic compilations. The compiler, or the last in a series of compilers, is today widely believed to beŌtomo no Yakamochi,although numerous other theories have been proposed. The chronologically last datable poem in the collection is from AD 759 (No.4516).[2]It contains many poems from a much earlier period, with the bulk of the collection representing the period between AD 600 and 759.[3]The precise significance of the title is not known with certainty.

TheMan'yōshūcomprises more than 4,500wakapoems in 20 volumes, and is broadly divided into three genres:Zoka,songs at banquets and trips;Somonka,songs about love between men and women; andBanka,songs to mourn the death of people.[4]These songs were written by people of various statuses, such as the Emperor, aristocrats, junior officials,Sakimorisoldiers (Sakimorisongs), street performers, peasants, andTogokufolk songs (Eastern songs). There are more than 2,100wakapoems by unknown authors.[5][6]

The collection is divided into 20 parts or books; this number was followed in most later collections. The collection contains 265chōka(long poems), 4,207tanka(short poems), onean-renga(short connecting poem), onebussokusekika(a poem in the form 5-7-5-7-7-7; named for the poems inscribed on the Buddha's footprints atYakushi-jiinNara), fourkanshi(Chinese poems), and 22 Chinese prose passages. Unlike later collections, such as theKokin Wakashū,there is no preface.

TheMan'yōshūis widely regarded as being a particularly unique Japanese work, though its poems and passages did not differ starkly from its contemporaneous (for Yakamochi's time) scholarly standard of Chinese literature and poetics; many entries of theMan'yōshūhave a continental tone, earlier poems havingConfucianorTaoistthemes and later poems reflecting onBuddhistteachings. However, theMan'yōshūis considered singular, even in comparison with later works, in choosing primarily Ancient Japanese themes, extollingShintōvirtues of forthrightness(Thật,makoto)and virility (masuraoburi). In addition, the language of many entries of theMan'yōshūexerts a powerful sentimental appeal to readers:

[T]his early collection has something of the freshness of dawn [...] There are irregularities not tolerated later, such as hypometric lines; there are evocative place names andmakurakotoba;and there are evocative exclamations such askamo,whose appeal is genuine even if incommunicable. In other words, the collection contains the appeal of an art at its pristine source with a romantic sense of venerable age and therefore of an ideal order since lost.[7]

The compilation of theMan'yōshūalso preserves the names of earlier Japanese poetic compilations, these being theRuijū Karin(Loại tụ ca lâm,Forest of Classified Verses),several texts called theKokashū(Cổ ca tập,Collections of Antique Poems),as well as at least four family or individual anthologies known askashū(Gia tập)belonging to Kakimoto no Hitomaro, Kasa no Kanamura, Takahashi no Mushimaro and Tanabe no Sakimaro.[8]

Name

[edit]
A page from theMan'yōshū

The literal translation of thekanjithat make up the titleMan'yōshū(Vạn — diệp — tập) is "ten thousand — leaves — collection".

The principal interpretations of this name, according to the 20th century scholarSen'ichi Hisamatsu[ja],are:

  1. A book that collects a great many poems;[9]
  2. A book for all generations;[9]and:
  3. A poetry collection that uses a large volume of paper.[9]

Of these, supporters of the first interpretation can be further divided into:

  1. Those who interpret the middle character as "words" (koto no ha,lit. "leaves of speech" ), thus giving "ten thousand words", i.e. "manywaka",[9]includingSengaku,[10]Shimokōbe Chōryū[ja],[11]Kada no Azumamaro[11]andKamo no Mabuchi,[11]and;
  2. Those who interpret the middle character as literally referring to leaves of a tree, but as a metaphor for poems,[11]includingUeda Akinari,[11]Kimura Masakoto[ja],[11]Masayuki Okada[ja],[11]Torao Suzuki[ja],[11]Kiyotaka Hoshikawa[ja]andSusumu Nakanishi.[11]

Furthermore, supporters of the second interpretation of the name can be divided into:

  1. It was meant to express the intention that the work should last for all time[11](proposed byKeichū,[11][c]and supported byKamochi Masazumi[ja],[11]Inoue Michiyasu[ja],[11]Yoshio Yamada,[11]Noriyuki Kojima[ja][11]andTadashi Ōkubo[ja][11]);
  2. It was meant to wish for long life for theemperorandempress[11](Shinobu Origuchi[ja][11]);
  3. It was meant to indicate that the collection included poems from all ages[11](proposed by Yamada[11]).

The third interpretation of the name - that it refers to a poetry collection that uses a large quantity of paper - was proposed byYūkichi Takedain hisMan'yōshū Shinkai jō(Vạn diệp tập tân giải thượng),[11]but Takeda also accepted the second interpretation; his theory that the title refers to the large volume of paper used in the collection has not gained much traction among other scholars.[11]

Periodization

[edit]

The collection is customarily divided into four periods. The earliest dates to prehistoric or legendary pasts, from the time ofEmperor Yūryaku(r.c. 456c. 479) to those of the little documentedEmperor Yōmei(r. 585–587),Saimei(r. 594–661), and finallyTenji(r. 668–671) during theTaika Reformsand the time ofFujiwara no Kamatari(614–669). The second period covers the end of the 7th century, coinciding with the popularity ofKakinomoto no Hitomaro,one of Japan's greatest poets. The third period spans 700 –c. 730and covers the works of such poets asYamabe no Akahito,Ōtomo no TabitoandYamanoue no Okura.The fourth period spans 730–760 and includes the work of the last great poet of this collection, the compiler Ōtomo no Yakamochi himself, who not only wrote many original poems but also edited, updated and refashioned an unknown number of ancient poems.

Poets

[edit]

The vast majority of the poems of theMan'yōshūwere composed over a period of roughly a century,[d]with scholars assigning the major poets of the collection to one or another of the four "periods" discussed above.Princess Nukata's poetry is included in that of the first period (645–672),[12]while the second period (673–701) is represented by the poetry ofKakinomoto no Hitomaro,generally regarded as the greatest ofMan'yōshūpoets and one of the most important poets in Japanese history.[13]The third period (702–729)[14]includes the poems ofTakechi no Kurohito,whomDonald Keenecalled "[t]he only new poet of importance" of the early part of this period,[15]whenFujiwara no Fuhitopromoted the composition ofkanshi(poetry inclassical Chinese).[16]Other "third period" poets include:Yamabe no Akahito,a poet who was once paired with Hitomaro but whose reputation has suffered in modern times;[17]Takahashi no Mushimaro,one of the last greatchōkapoets, who recorded a number of Japanese legends such as that ofUra no Shimako;[18]andKasa no Kanamura,a high-ranking courtier who also composedchōkabut not as well as Hitomaro or Mushimaro.[19]But the most prominent and important poets of the third period wereŌtomo no Tabito,Yakamochi's father and the head of a poetic circle in theDazaifu,[20]and Tabito's friendYamanoue no Okura,possibly an immigrant from the Korean kingdom ofPaekche,whose poetry is highly idiosyncratic in both its language and subject matter and has been highly praised in modern times.[21]Yakamochi himself was a poet of the fourth period (730–759),[22]and according to Keene he "dominated" this period.[23]He composed the last dated poem of the anthology in 759.[24]

Linguistic significance

[edit]

In addition to its artistic merits, theMan'yōshūis significant for using the earliest Japanese writing system, the cumbersomeman'yōgana.[25]Though it was by no means the first use of this writing system—which was used to compose theKojiki(712),[26]—it was influential enough to give the writing system its modern name, asman'yōganameans "thekanaof theMan'yō[shū]".[27]This system uses Chinese characters in a variety of functions:logographicallyto represent Japanese words, phonetically to represent Japanese sounds, and frequently in a combination of these. Such usage of Chinese characters to phonetically represent Japanese syllables eventually led to the birth ofkana,as they were created from simplified cursive forms (hiragana) and fragments (katakana) ofman'yōgana.[28]

Like the majority of survivingOld Japaneseliterature, the vast majority of theMan'yōshūis written in Western Old Japanese, the dialect of thecapital regionaroundKyotoandNara.However, specific parts of the collection, particularly volumes 14 and 20, are also highly valued by historical linguists for the information they provide on otherOld Japanese dialects,[29]as these volumes collectively contain over 300 poems from theAzumaprovinces of eastern Japan—what is now the regions ofChūbu,Kanto,and southernTōhoku.

Translations

[edit]

Julius Klaprothproduced some early, severely flawed translations ofMan'yōshūpoetry.Donald Keeneexplained in a preface to theNihon Gakujutsu Shinkō Kaiedition of theMan'yōshū:

One "envoy" (hanka) to a long poem was translated as early as 1834 by the celebrated German orientalist Heinrich Julius Klaproth (1783–1835). Klaproth, having journeyed to Siberia in pursuit of strange languages, encountered some Japanese castaways, fishermen, hardly ideal mentors for the study of 8th century poetry. Not surprisingly, his translation was anything but accurate.[30]

In 1940,Columbia University Presspublished a translation created by a committee of Japanese scholars and revised by the English poet,Ralph Hodgson.This translation was accepted in the Japanese Translation Series of theUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(UNESCO).[31]

Dutch scholar Jan L. Pierson completed an English translation of the Man'yōshū between 1929 and 1963, although this is described by Alexander Vovin as "seriously outdated" due to Pierson having "ignored or misunderstood many facts of Old Japanese grammar and phonology" which had been established in the 20th century.[32]Japanese scholars Honda Heihachiro (1967) and Suga Teruo (1991) both produced complete literary translations into English, with the former using rhymed iambic feet and preserving the 31-syllable count of tanka and the latter preserving the 5-7 pattern of syllables in each line.[32][33][34][35]Ian Hideo Levypublished the first of what was intended to be a four volume English translation in 1981[33][34][36]for which he received theJapan–U.S. Friendship Commission Prize for the Translation of Japanese Literature.[37]

In 2009,Alexander Vovinpublished the first volume of his English translation of theMan'yōshū,including commentaries, the original text, and translations of the prose elements in-between poems.[32]He completed, in order, volumes 15, 5, 14, 20, 17, 18, 1, 19, 2, and 16 before his death in 2022, with volume 10 set to be released posthumously.

Mokkan

[edit]

In premodern Japan, officials used wooden slips or tablets of various sizes, known asmokkan,for recording memoranda, simple correspondence, and official dispatches.[38]Threemokkanthat have been excavated contain text from theMan'yōshū.[39][40][41][42]Amokkanexcavated inKizugawa, Kyoto,contains the first 11 characters of poem 2205 from volume 10, written inMan'yōgana.It is dated between 750 and 780, and its size is 23.4 by 2.4 by 1.2 cm (9.21 by 0.94 by 0.47 in). Inspection with an infrared camera revealed other characters, suggesting that themokkanwas used for writing practice. Anothermokkan,excavated in 1997 from the Miyamachi archaeological site inKōka, Shiga,contains poem 3807 in volume 16. It is dated to the middle of the 8th century, and is 2 centimetres (0.79 in) wide by 1 millimetre (0.039 in) thick. Lastly, amokkanexcavated at the Ishigami archaeological site inAsuka, Nara,contains the first 14 characters of poem 1391, in volume 7, written inMan'yōgana.Its size is 9.1 by 5.5 by 0.6 cm (3.58 by 2.17 by 0.24 in), and it is dated to the late 7th century, making it the oldest of the three.

Plant species cited

[edit]

More than 150speciesof grasses and trees are mentioned in approximately 1,500 entries of theMan'yōshū.AMan'yō shokubutsu-en(Vạn diệp vườn thực vật)is abotanical gardenthat attempts to contain every species and variety of plant mentioned in the anthology. There are dozens of these gardens around Japan. The firstMan'yō shokubutsu-enopened inKasuga Shrinein 1932.[43][44]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^See§ Namebelow
  2. ^It is not the oldest anthology of poetry written in Japan, since theKaifūsō,an anthology of Japanesekanshi—poetry inClassical Chinese—predates it by at least several years.
  3. ^Keichū also recognized the first interpretation as a possibility.[11]
  4. ^A small number of poems are attributed to figures from the ancient past, such asEmperor Yūryaku.

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Videen, Susan Downing (1989-10-26).Heichū Monogatari in Literary History.Harvard University Asia Center.ISBN978-1-68417-275-7.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-07-20.Retrieved2023-02-26.
  2. ^Satake (2004: 555)
  3. ^Shirane, Haruo (2012-09-25).Traditional Japanese Literature: An Anthology, Beginnings to 1600, Abridged Edition.Columbia University Press.ISBN978-0-231-50453-9.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-12-22.Retrieved2023-02-26.
  4. ^Richard, Kenneth L. (1983)."Review of The Ten Thousand Leaves. A Translation of the Man'yoshu, Japan's Premier Anthology of Classical Poetry. Volume One.; From the Country of Eight Islands. An Anthology of Japanese Poetry.; The Zen Poems of Ryokan".Pacific Affairs.56(1): 157–159.doi:10.2307/2758798.ISSN0030-851X.JSTOR2758798.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-02-26.Retrieved2023-02-26.
  5. ^Manyo 2001
  6. ^Sugano 2006
  7. ^Earl Miner;Hiroko Odagiri; Robert E. Morrell (1985).The Princeton Companion to Classical Japanese Literature.Princeton University Press.pp.170–171.ISBN978-0-691-06599-1.
  8. ^"Man'yōshū •. A History.. of Japan. Nhật Bản lịch sử"..A History.. of Japan. Nhật Bản lịch sử.Archivedfrom the original on 2022-12-24.Retrieved2022-05-08.
  9. ^abcdHisamatsu 1973,p. 16.
  10. ^Hisamatsu 1973,pp. 16–17.
  11. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwHisamatsu 1973,p. 17.
  12. ^Keene 1999,pp. 92–102.
  13. ^Keene 1999,pp. 102–118.
  14. ^Keene 1999,pp. 118–146.
  15. ^Keene 1999,p. 119.
  16. ^Keene 1999,pp. 118–119.
  17. ^Keene 1999,pp. 123–127.
  18. ^Keene 1999,pp. 127–128.
  19. ^Keene 1999,pp. 128–130.
  20. ^Keene 1999,pp. 130–138.
  21. ^Keene 1999,pp. 138–146.
  22. ^Keene 1999,pp. 146–157.
  23. ^Keene 1999,p. 146.
  24. ^Keene 1999,p. 89.
  25. ^Shuichi Kato; Don Sanderson (15 April 2013).A History of Japanese Literature: From the Manyoshu to Modern Times.Routledge. p. 24.ISBN978-1-136-61368-5.
  26. ^Roy Andrew Miller (1967).The Japanese Language.Tuttle. p. 32.,cited inPeter Nosco (1990).Remembering Paradise: Nativism and Nostalgia in Eighteenth-century Japan.Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 182.ISBN978-0-674-76007-3.
  27. ^Bjarke Frellesvig (29 July 2010).A History of the Japanese Language.Cambridge University Press. p. 14.ISBN978-1-139-48880-8.Archivedfrom the original on 19 January 2023.Retrieved9 December2018.
  28. ^Peter T. Daniels (1996).The World's Writing Systems.Oxford University Press. p. 212.ISBN978-0-19-507993-7.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-01-19.Retrieved2018-12-09.
  29. ^Uemura 1981:25–26.[citation needed]
  30. ^Nippon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai. (1965).The Man'yōshū,p. iii.
  31. ^Nippon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai, p. ii.
  32. ^abcVovin, Alexander (2009-08-01).Man'yōshū (Book 15).BRILL.doi:10.1163/9789004212992.ISBN978-90-04-21299-2.
  33. ^abRutledge, Eric (1983). "The Man'yoshu in English".Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies.43(1). JSTOR: 263–290.doi:10.2307/2719024.ISSN0073-0548.JSTOR2719024.
  34. ^abHare, Thomas Blenman (1982). "Review: The Ten Thousand Leaves: A Translation of the Man'yōshū, Japan's Premier Anthology of Classical Poetry. Vol. 1".The Journal of Asian Studies.41(3). Duke University Press: 597–599.doi:10.2307/2055272.ISSN0021-9118.JSTOR2055272.
  35. ^Honda, H. H. (1967).The Manyoshu. A New and Complete Translation.Tokyo.
  36. ^Levy, I. H. (1981).The Man'yoshu. English Ten Thousand Leaves: A Translation of the Man'yoshu, Japan's Premier Anthology of Classical Poetry.Princeton University Press.
  37. ^"Archive of past prize winners for the Japan-U.S. Friendship Commission Prize for the Translation of Japanese Literature".Donald Keene Center.Archivedfrom the original on 9 May 2021.Retrieved26 February2024.
  38. ^Piggott, Joan R. (Winter 1990). "Mokkan: Wooden Documents from the Nara Period".Monumenta Nipponica.45(4). Sophia University: 449–450.doi:10.2307/2385379.JSTOR2385379.
  39. ^"7 thế kỷ の mộc giản に vạn diệp の ca nại lương ・ thạch thần di tích, 60 năm đổi mới".Asahi. 2008-10-17. Archived fromthe originalon October 20, 2008.Retrieved2008-10-31.
  40. ^"Vạn diệp tập: 3 lệ mục, vạn diệp ca mộc giản biên さん kỳ と nhất trí -- kinh đô の di tích ・8 thế kỷ phần sau".Mainichi.2008-10-23.Retrieved2008-10-31.[dead link]
  41. ^"Vạn diệp tập: Vạn diệp ca, nhất cổ の mộc giản 7 thế kỷ phần sau -- nại lương ・ thạch thần di tích".Mainichi.2008-10-18. Archived fromthe originalon October 20, 2008.Retrieved2008-10-31.
  42. ^"Vạn diệp tập: Cùng ca khắc んだ nhất cổ の mộc trốn tránh thổ nại lương ・ ngày mai hương".Asahi. 2008-10-17.Retrieved2008-10-31.[dead link]
  43. ^"Manyo Shokubutsu-en( vạn diệp tập に vịnh まれた thực vật を thực tài する vườn thực vật )"(in Japanese).Nara:Kasuga Shrine.Archivedfrom the original on 2014-04-11.Retrieved2009-08-05.
  44. ^"Man'y Botanical garden( vạn diệp vườn thực vật )"(PDF)(in Japanese).Nara:Kasuga Shrine.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on 2011-10-05.Retrieved2009-08-05.

Works cited

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
Texts and translations
General
[edit]