Jump to content

Mark V tank

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mark V tank
A British Mark V (Male) tank
TypeHeavy tank
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Service history
In service1918 – (last known) 1945[1][2]
WarsFirst World War
Russian Civil War
Second World War(unknown usage)
Production history
DesignerMajorW. G. Wilson
Designed1917
ManufacturerMetropolitan Amalgamated Railway Carriage & Wagon Company,Birmingham,England
Produced1917 – June 1918
No.built400
Specifications
MassMale: 29 tons "battle weight"
Female: 28 tons[3]
Length26 ft 5 in (8 m)[3]
WidthMale: 13 ft 6 inch (4.1m)[3]
Female: 10 ft 6 in
Height2.64 m (8 ft 8 in)[4]
Crew8 (commander, driver, and six gunners)

Armour16 mm (0.63 in) maximum front
12 mm sides
8 mm roof and "belly"[3]
Main
armament
Male:

Two6-pounder (57-mm) 6 cwt QF gunswith 207 rounds;
four.303 in (7.7-mm)Hotchkiss Mk 1 Machine Gun
Female:

Six.303 inHotchkiss Mk 1 Machine Gun
Engine19 litre six cylinder in-lineRicardopetrol engine
150 hp (110 kW) at 1200 rpm
Power/weightMale: 5.2 hp/ton[3]
Transmission4 forward 1 reverse, Wilson epicyclic in final drive
Fuel capacity93 imperial gallons (420 L)[3]
Operational
range
45 mi (72 km) radius of action[3]about 10 hours endurance
Maximum speed5 mph (8.0 km/h) maximum
Steering
system
Wilson epicyclic steering

The BritishMark V tank[a]was an upgraded version of theMark IV tank.

The tank was improved in several aspects over the Mark IV, chiefly the new steering system, transmission and 150bhpengine, but it fell short in other areas, particularly its insufficient ventilation leading tocarbon monoxide poisoningfor the crew.[5]Various versions were fitted with a variety of armament including 6-pounder guns and machine guns.

It was first deployed in July 1918 on theWestern Frontat theBattle of Hamel;then at theBattle of Amiens,and on theHindenburg Lineduring the closing months of World War I.

During theAllied intervention in the Russian Civil Waron theWhite Russianside, four Mark Vs were delivered toArchangelsk,four toTallinn,Estonia,[6]and around 70 were delivered toNovorossiyskin southern Russia. The survivors were captured and used by theRed Army.[7]

There were two main further variants, the lengthened Mark V* and a few Mark V**s with a more powerful engine and wider tracks. A planned Mark V*** was never built. There are eleven surviving Mark V tanks. TheMark VIII tankwas an enlarged Mark V with greater power: only those with theLiberty enginesaw post-war service in the US. A further unarmed development was theMark IX tank,one of the firstarmoured personnel carriers,which saw limited use in Britain after the war.

In general the Mark V was successful, especially given its limited service history, and somewhat primitive design dating back to 1915.

History[edit]

The Mark V was, at first, intended to be a completely new design of tank, of which a wooden mock-up had been completed; however, when the new engine and transmission originally planned for the Mark IV became available in December 1917, the first, more advanced Mark V design was abandoned to avoid disrupting production.[7]The designation "Mark V" was switched to an improved version of the Mark IV, equipped with the new systems. The original design of the Mark IV was to have been a large improvement on the Mark III, but had been scaled back due to technical delays. The Mark V thus turned out very similar to the original design of the Mark IV – i.e. a greatly modified Mark III.[1]

Production of the Mark V started atMetropolitan Carriage & Wagonat the end of 1917; the first tanks arrived in France in May 1918. Four hundred were built, 200 Males and Females; the "Males" armed with 6-pounder (57 mm) guns and machine guns, the "Females" with machine guns only. Several were converted toHermaphrodites(sometimes known as "Mark V Composite" ) by fitting one male and one female sponson. This measure was intended to ensure that female tanks would not be outgunned when faced with captured British male tanks in German use, or the Germans' ownA7V.[1]

The Mark V was to be followed by the more advancedTank Mark VI,but this was abandoned in December 1917, to ensure sufficient production by British, American, and French factories of theTank Mark VIIIfor a planned 1919 offensive. However, the war ended in November 1918, and few Mark VIIIs would be built (most of those completed in Britain were immediately scrapped).[8]After the war, most of the British Army's tank units were disbanded, leaving five tank battalions equipped with either the Mark V or theMedium Mark C.The British Army's interest shifted more to lighter, faster tanks, and the Mark V was partially replaced by theVickers Medium Mark Iduring the mid-1920s. TheVickers A1E1 Independentreached prototype stage in 1926, but it was abandoned for lack of funds. The remaining Mark Vs appear to have been replaced by medium tanks by the end of the decade.[9]

Modifications[edit]

The huge differential gear at the rear of a Mark IV tank
Diagram of the Wilson epicyclic transmission

In early 1917, some British tanks were tested with various experimental powerplant and transmissions ordered byAlbert Stern.These included petrol-electric schemes, hydraulic systems, a multiple clutch system, and anepicyclic gearboxdesigned by MajorW. G. Wilson.Though the petrol-electrics had advantages, Wilson's design was capable of production and was selected for use in future tanks.[5]

The use of Wilson's epicyclic steering gear in the Mark V meant that the driver could control all aspects of the transmission: three extra crew members had been required in previous versions of the tank, two gearsmen to change low and high gears on either side of the tank, and the commander who operated the brakes andskid steering.[8]There was much more space at the rear after the removal of the massivedifferential gear(originally designed for the Daimler-Foster agricultural tractor) fitted to all the earlier tanks. On the roof towards the rear of the tank, behind the engine, was a second raised cabin, with hinged sides that allowed the crew to attach theunditching beamwithout exiting the vehicle. An additional machine-gun mount was fitted at the rear of the hull.[5][10]

The Mark V had a new, more powerful six cylinder engine (also ordered by Stern) designed byHarry Ricardo,displacing 19 litres and developing 150 bhp (110 kW).[11]According toJ. F. C. Fuller,the Ricardo engine was of a "somewhat unorthodox design", but it was highly efficient and, with proper care and attention, gave very little trouble.[8]This 'unorthodox' description related to Ricardo's use ofcrosshead pistonswhich separated the lubricating oil from the heat of combustion, with thecrossheadandgudgeon pinrunning in its own separate guide.[12][13]The engine used conventionalpoppet valves,unlike the Daimlersleeve valveengines used in the previous tanks; because very few men or officers had any experience of adjusting valve mechanisms, extra instruction was needed for tank personnel.[8]The Ricardo engine could have been considerably more powerful, but its design was restricted by two considerations. Firstly, it needed to fit in the exact same footprint as the original Daimler 105 hp engine in the older tanks Marks I–IV, resulting in a taller engine; secondly, Wilson had advised Ricardo that the proposed 200 bhp (150 kW) would place too much strain on the transmission, and it was limited to 150 bhp.[12]

Operating issues[edit]

The Ricardo engine was still in the centre of the crew compartment which led to miserable crew conditions from its heat output.[5]The noise also interfered with crew communication.[14]

The ventilation was the area in which the Mark V suffered its largest weakness. The previous Marks I–IV drew cooling air from inside the tank, through the radiator, and then expelled the air through a vent, which provided a constant supply of moving air for the crew. In contrast, the Mark V, drew air from outside the tank, across the radiator, and then expelled the air though a vent, which left the air inside the crew compartment stagnant.[5]The only ventilation for the crew compartment, other than the driver and gunner view-ports, located on all sides of the tank, was a roof-mounted Keith fan.[8][15]This fan was inadequate for maintaining a stable supply of clean air for the crew of a Mark V; exhaust and gun-smoke were trapped with the crew, which caused many crewmen to grow ill and, in the most extreme cases, was enough to render them unconscious; either way the crew was practically unfit for combat within a few hours.

An extra sliding shutter was later fitted which drew foul air out of the fighting compartment, which is thought to have made some improvement.[16]

Variants[edit]

Mark V*[edit]

A British Mark V* tank—on the roof the tank carries an "unditching beam" on rails, that could be attached to the tracks and used to extricate the vehicle from difficult muddy trenches and shell craters

In an attempt to stop the tank threat, the German Army began digging wider trenches that made it difficult for tanks to cross. For example, trenches in theHindenburg Linewere widened to 11 or 12 feet (3.4 or 3.7 m), which was more than the British tanks' 10 feet (3.0 m) trench-crossing ability. To counter this, SirWilliam Trittondeveloped the 'tadpole tail', an extension of the track horns to be fitted to the back of a Mark IV tank, which lengthened the tank by about 9 feet (2.7 m).[17]Although 300 sets of tails were sent to France in the spring of 1918, they were never fitted, and the design was never used in combat.[18]

This in turn caused Major Philip Johnson of the Central Tank Corps Workshops to devise a plan of his own in early 1918. He cut a Mark IV in half and inserted three extra panels, lengthening the entire hull by six feet. Three vehicles were modified in this way. (It was believed for a long time that most Mark V*[b]had been field conversions made by Johnson. They were in fact all new, factory-built to a new design).[19]The Mark V* had a reshaped rear cupola incorporating 2 extra machine-gun mounts, a door in each side of the hull, with an extra machine-gun mount on each. This tank weighed 33 tons.

The extra space also allowed up to fourteen men to be carried in addition to the standard crew: the 1st BattalionRoyal Tank Regimentclaimed that it was possible to squeeze in 2Lewis gunswith crews of two; 2Vickers gunseach with a four-man crew; plus an infantry scout and an officer. However, they tended to succumb to the fume-filled atmosphere as described above.[20]

The total orders for the Mark V* were 500 Males and 200 Females, 579 had been built by the Armistice – the order was completed by Metropolitan Carriage in March 1919.[21]Shortly before the end of the War, Britain supplied France with 100 Mk V* (80 males and 20 females). They were not used in action, but remained in French service throughout the 1920s. Retired from active service in 1930, they were kept in storage to have heavy tanks to discard in case theConference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armamentsrequested it.[22]

Mark V**[edit]

A British Mark V** tank

Because the Mark V* had been lengthened, its original length-width ratio had been spoiled. Lateral forces in a turn now became unacceptably high causing thrown tracks and an enormous turning circle. Therefore, Major Wilson redesigned the track in May 1918, with a stronger curve to the lower run reducing ground contact (but increasing ground pressure as a trade-off) and the tracks were widened to 26.5 in (67 cm). The Mark V engine was bored out to give 225 hp (168 kW) and sat further back in the hull. The cabin for the driver was combined with the commander's cabin; there now was a separate machine gun position in the back. Of a revised order for 700 tanks (150 Females and 550 Males) only 25 were built and only one of those by the end of 1918.[21]

Mark V***[edit]

See:Mark X.

Combat history[edit]

World War I (Western Front)[edit]

A Mark V tank atLamotte-en-Santerre,8 August 1918, leaving for an attack during the Battle of Amiens.

The Mk V made its combat debut during theBattle of Hamelon 4 July 1918. Sixty Mark Vs successfully supported Australian troops in an action that repaired the Australians' confidence in tanks, which had been badly damaged at Bullecourt.[23]Thereafter Mk Vs were used in eight major actions before the end of the war.

During theBattle of Amiensin August 1918, 288 Mark V tanks, along with the newWhippetand Mk V*, penetrated the German lines in a foretaste of modern armoured warfare, and signalled the end of trench warfare.

TheAmerican 301st Heavy Tank Battalionwas equipped with 19 Mark V and 21 Mark V* tanks in their first heavy tank action against the Hindenburg Line on 27 September 1918. Of the 21 Mark V* tanks, 9 were hit by artillery rounds (one totally destroyed), 2 hit British mines, 5 had mechanical problems, and 2 ditched in trenches. The battalion, however, did reach its objective.

Russian Civil War[edit]

Approximately 70 Mark V tanks supplied by Great Britain to theWhite Russian Armyand subsequently captured by the Red Army in the course of theRussian Civil Warwere used in 1921 during theRed Army invasion of Georgiaand contributed to the Soviet victory in the battle forTbilisi.[24]In the north, four Mark Vs had been delivered to White Russian forces inArchangelskin 1919, and four toTallinn,Estonia along with twoRenault FTs.[6]

World War II[edit]

In the defence of Tallinn by the Red Army against German forces in August 1941, the fourMk Vs previously operated by Estoniawere planned to be used as dug-in fortifications. It is not known whether this plan was carried out in battle. It is believed that they were subsequently scrapped.[25]

In 1945, Allied troops came across two badly damaged Mk V tanks in Berlin. Photographic evidence indicates that these were survivors of the Russian Civil War and had previously been displayed as a monument inSmolensk,Russia, before being brought to Berlin after the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941.[1]Accounts of their active involvement in theBattle of Berlinhave not been verified.[2]

Surviving vehicles[edit]

Eleven Mark V tanks survived. The majority are in Russia or Ukraine and are survivors of the tanks sent there to aid the White forces during theRussian Civil War.

  • The Tank Museum,Bovington displays a Mark V Male,Number 9199.It was in action at theBattle of Amienswhere its commander – Lt. HA Whittenbury – was awarded theMilitary Cross.It was subsequently damaged by artillery atBellicourtin September 1918, during theHundred Days Offensive.It has been at Bovington since 1925, and was used for demonstrations and filming.[26]While this tank is maintained in running condition, the Bovington museum had made the decision to not run it again, because of the wear and tear that would be inflicted on the now-fragile, historic vehicle.[27]
The driving and forward gunner position ofOl'Faithful
  • A heavily restored Mark V Male,Devil,survives at the LondonImperial War Museum.The right sponson was removed to allow a view of the tank's interior, but in the museum's 2013 - 2014 refit the vehicle was resited in such a way that the interior is no longer visible to the public.[28]
  • A Mark V Composite is at theKubinka Tank Museum,Russia.
  • A Mark V Female serves as memorial inArkhangelsk.This was originally used by British forces during theAllied Intervention in the Russian Civil War.
  • Two preserved Mark Vs, both Composites, form part of anoutdoor memorialatLuhanskinUkraine.Two more are in storage.
  • A Mark V Composite is at theM. F. Sumtsov Kharkiv Historical Museum,Ukraine.
  • A Mark V* Male, Number 9591, has been part of theU.S. Army Armor and Cavalry CollectionatFort Moore,Georgia since 2010. Issued to Company A, US 301st Heavy Tank Battalion and hit by a 57 mm (2.2 in) shell round on 27 September 1918 during the attack against the Hindenburg Line, it was repaired and sent back to the United States. It is the only surviving example of the Mark V*.
  • A Mark V** Female:Ol'Faithful,is also preserved at Bovington. It never saw action during the war, but post–war was fitted with hydraulic lifting gear so it could carry and deploy portable bridges, and carry out other engineering tasks. During World War II, it was used as a ballast weight to testBailey bridges.[29]

Gallery[edit]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^meaning 'Mark 5': Britain usedRoman numeralsto designate successive models of early heavy tanks
  2. ^the asterisk (*) in early British tank designations was usually pronounced as "star" when spoken, e.g., Mark Five-star, or Mark Five-star-star, etc.

References[edit]

  1. ^abcdFletcher (2011) p.47
  2. ^ab"WW1 MK V tanks in Berlin 1945".Archived fromthe originalon 5 January 2009.
  3. ^abcdefgAFV Profile No. 3Tanks Marks I to V
  4. ^Tank, Mark V (Male),Bovington Tank Museum
  5. ^abcdeFletcher, David."Tank Chats #21 Mark V Tank".Youtube.Archivedfrom the original on 19 December 2021.Retrieved31 March2017.
  6. ^abBullock, David; Deryabin, Alexander (2003).Armored Units of the Russian Civil War: White and Allied.New Vanguard 83. illustrated by Alexei Aksenov. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. pp. 14–15.
  7. ^abFletcher, David (2011).Mark V Tank.Oxford: Osprey Publishing. pp. 20–28.
  8. ^abcdeFuller, J. F. C. (1920).Tanks in the Great War: 1914-1918.New York: E. P. Dutton and Company. pp. 35–49.
  9. ^"British Tanks of the Inter-war Decades".Retrieved13 August2018.
  10. ^Fletcher (2011), pp. 10–12.
  11. ^Smith, K. C. A. (2000)."First World War Tank Engines"."A Pioneer of the Internal Combustion Engine - Sir Harry Ricardo F.R.S. 1885–1974"University of Cambridge Department of Engineering.Retrieved 28 August 2020.
  12. ^abFletcher (2011), pp. 5–6.
  13. ^"Sectional models of the 150 h.p. Ricardo Tank engine for instructional purposes".Imperial War Museum.Retrieved28 August2020.
  14. ^Baker, Chris."The Tank Corps of 1914-1918".The Long Long Trail.Retrieved31 March2017.
  15. ^"James Keith and Blackman Co".Grace's Guide to British Industrial History.Retrieved28 August2020.
  16. ^Fletcher (2011), p. 14.
  17. ^"Tadpole tanks".Landships.Retrieved28 August2020.
  18. ^Glanfield (2006), p. 224.
  19. ^Fletcher (2011), pp. 16–17.
  20. ^Fletcher (2011), p. 20.
  21. ^abGlanfield, Devil's Chariots
  22. ^Vauvillier, François (April 2012). "Char lourd Mark V Étoile".Histoire de Guerre, Blindés et Matériel(in French). No. 100. p. 28.
  23. ^"First Battle of Bullecourt".awm.gov.au.
  24. ^Bullock, David (2006).Armored Units of the Russian Civil War: Red Army.Illustrated by A. Aksenov, and P. Sarson. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, pp. 38–41.ISBN1-84176-545-7
  25. ^Tiit Noormets & Mati Õun, (1999).Estonian Armoured Vehicles 1918–1940.Tammiskilp, p. 94.ISBN9789985606926
  26. ^"Tank, Mark V (Male) (E1949.327)".Bovington Tank Museum.Retrieved28 October2012.
  27. ^Fletcher (2013), p.153
  28. ^"IWM World War 1 Gallery".Eckersley O’Callaghan. Archived fromthe originalon 4 March 2016.Retrieved29 February2016.
  29. ^"Tank, Mark V** (Female) (E1949.325)".Bovington Tank Museum.Retrieved28 October2012.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]