Jump to content

Mathematics

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromMaths)

Mathematicsis a field of study that discovers and organizes methods,theoriesandtheoremsthat are developed andprovedfor the needs ofempirical sciencesand mathematics itself. There are many areas of mathematics, which includenumber theory(the study of numbers),algebra(the study of formulas and related structures),geometry(the study of shapes and spaces that contain them),analysis(the study of continuous changes), andset theory(presently used as a foundation for all mathematics).

Mathematics involves the description and manipulation ofabstract objectsthat consist of eitherabstractionsfrom nature or—in modern mathematics—purely abstract entities that are stipulated to have certain properties, calledaxioms.Mathematics uses purereasontoproveproperties of objects, aproofconsisting of a succession of applications ofdeductive rulesto already established results. These results include previously provedtheorems,axioms, and—in case of abstraction from nature—some basic properties that are considered true starting points of the theory under consideration.[1]

Mathematics is essential in thenatural sciences,engineering,medicine,finance,computer science,and thesocial sciences.Although mathematics is extensively used for modeling phenomena, the fundamental truths of mathematics are independent of any scientific experimentation. Some areas of mathematics, such asstatisticsandgame theory,are developed in close correlation with their applications and are often grouped underapplied mathematics.Other areas are developed independently from any application (and are therefore calledpure mathematics) but often later find practical applications.[2][3]

Historically, the concept of a proof and its associatedmathematical rigourfirst appeared inGreek mathematics,most notably inEuclid'sElements.[4]Since its beginning, mathematics was primarily divided into geometry andarithmetic(the manipulation ofnatural numbersandfractions), until the 16th and 17th centuries, when algebra[a]andinfinitesimal calculuswere introduced as new fields. Since then, the interaction between mathematical innovations andscientific discoverieshas led to a correlated increase in the development of both.[5]At the end of the 19th century, thefoundational crisis of mathematicsled to the systematization of theaxiomatic method,[6]which heralded a dramatic increase in the number of mathematical areas and their fields of application. The contemporaryMathematics Subject Classificationlists more than sixty first-level areas of mathematics.

Areas of mathematics

Before theRenaissance,mathematics was divided into two main areas:arithmetic,regarding the manipulation of numbers, andgeometry,regarding the study of shapes.[7]Some types ofpseudoscience,such asnumerologyandastrology,were not then clearly distinguished from mathematics.[8]

During the Renaissance, two more areas appeared.Mathematical notationled toalgebrawhich, roughly speaking, consists of the study and the manipulation offormulas.Calculus,consisting of the two subfieldsdifferential calculusandintegral calculus,is the study ofcontinuous functions,which model the typicallynonlinear relationshipsbetween varying quantities, as represented byvariables.This division into four main areas—arithmetic, geometry, algebra, calculus[9]—endured until the end of the 19th century. Areas such ascelestial mechanicsandsolid mechanicswere then studied by mathematicians, but now are considered as belonging to physics.[10]The subject ofcombinatoricshas been studied for much of recorded history, yet did not become a separate branch of mathematics until the seventeenth century.[11]

At the end of the 19th century, thefoundational crisis in mathematicsand the resulting systematization of theaxiomatic methodled to an explosion of new areas of mathematics.[12][6]The 2020Mathematics Subject Classificationcontains no less thansixty-threefirst-level areas.[13]Some of these areas correspond to the older division, as is true regardingnumber theory(the modern name forhigher arithmetic) and geometry. Several other first-level areas have "geometry" in their names or are otherwise commonly considered part of geometry. Algebra and calculus do not appear as first-level areas but are respectively split into several first-level areas. Other first-level areas emerged during the 20th century or had not previously been considered as mathematics, such asmathematical logicandfoundations.[14]

Number theory

This is theUlam spiral,which illustrates the distribution ofprime numbers.The dark diagonal lines in the spiral hint at the hypothesized approximateindependencebetween being prime and being a value of a quadratic polynomial, a conjecture now known asHardy and Littlewood's Conjecture F.

Number theory began with the manipulation ofnumbers,that is,natural numbersand later expanded tointegersandrational numbersNumber theory was once called arithmetic, but nowadays this term is mostly used fornumerical calculations.[15]Number theory dates back to ancientBabylonand probablyChina.Two prominent early number theorists wereEuclidof ancient Greece andDiophantusof Alexandria.[16]The modern study of number theory in its abstract form is largely attributed toPierre de FermatandLeonhard Euler.The field came to full fruition with the contributions ofAdrien-Marie LegendreandCarl Friedrich Gauss.[17]

Many easily stated number problems have solutions that require sophisticated methods, often from across mathematics. A prominent example isFermat's Last Theorem.This conjecture was stated in 1637 by Pierre de Fermat, but itwas provedonly in 1994 byAndrew Wiles,who used tools includingscheme theoryfromalgebraic geometry,category theory,andhomological algebra.[18]Another example isGoldbach's conjecture,which asserts that every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of twoprime numbers.Stated in 1742 byChristian Goldbach,it remains unproven despite considerable effort.[19]

Number theory includes several subareas, includinganalytic number theory,algebraic number theory,geometry of numbers(method oriented),diophantine equations,andtranscendence theory(problem oriented).[14]

Geometry

On the surface of a sphere, Euclidean geometry only applies as a local approximation. For larger scales the sum of the angles of a triangle is not equal to 180°.

Geometry is one of the oldest branches of mathematics. It started with empirical recipes concerning shapes, such aslines,anglesandcircles,which were developed mainly for the needs ofsurveyingandarchitecture,but has since blossomed out into many other subfields.[20]

A fundamental innovation was the ancient Greeks' introduction of the concept ofproofs,which require that every assertion must beproved.For example, it is not sufficient to verify bymeasurementthat, say, two lengths are equal; their equality must be proven via reasoning from previously accepted results (theorems) and a few basic statements. The basic statements are not subject to proof because they are self-evident (postulates), or are part of the definition of the subject of study (axioms). This principle, foundational for all mathematics, was first elaborated for geometry, and was systematized byEuclidaround 300 BC in his bookElements.[21][22]

The resultingEuclidean geometryis the study of shapes and their arrangementsconstructedfrom lines,planesand circles in theEuclidean plane(plane geometry) and the three-dimensionalEuclidean space.[b][20]

Euclidean geometry was developed without change of methods or scope until the 17th century, whenRené Descartesintroduced what is now calledCartesian coordinates.This constituted a majorchange of paradigm:Instead of definingreal numbersas lengths ofline segments(seenumber line), it allowed the representation of points using theircoordinates,which are numbers. Algebra (and later, calculus) can thus be used to solve geometrical problems. Geometry was split into two new subfields:synthetic geometry,which uses purely geometrical methods, andanalytic geometry,which uses coordinates systemically.[23]

Analytic geometry allows the study ofcurvesunrelated to circles and lines. Such curves can be defined as thegraph of functions,the study of which led todifferential geometry.They can also be defined asimplicit equations,oftenpolynomial equations(which spawnedalgebraic geometry). Analytic geometry also makes it possible to consider Euclidean spaces of higher than three dimensions.[20]

In the 19th century, mathematicians discoverednon-Euclidean geometries,which do not follow theparallel postulate.By questioning that postulate's truth, this discovery has been viewed as joiningRussell's paradoxin revealing thefoundational crisis of mathematics.This aspect of the crisis was solved by systematizing the axiomatic method, and adopting that the truth of the chosen axioms is not a mathematical problem.[24][6]In turn, the axiomatic method allows for the study of various geometries obtained either by changing the axioms or by considering properties thatdo not changeunder specific transformations of thespace.[25]

Today's subareas of geometry include:[14]

Algebra

refer to caption
Thequadratic formula,which concisely expresses the solutions of allquadratic equations
A shuffled 3x3 rubik's cube
TheRubik's Cube groupis a concrete application ofgroup theory.[26]

Algebra is the art of manipulatingequationsand formulas.Diophantus(3rd century) andal-Khwarizmi(9th century) were the two main precursors of algebra.[27][28]Diophantus solved some equations involving unknown natural numbers by deducing new relations until he obtained the solution.[29]Al-Khwarizmi introduced systematic methods for transforming equations, such as moving a term from one side of an equation into the other side.[30]The termalgebrais derived from theArabicwordal-jabrmeaning 'the reunion of broken parts' that he used for naming one of these methods in the title ofhis main treatise.[31][32]

Algebra became an area in its own right only withFrançois Viète(1540–1603), who introduced the use of variables for representing unknown or unspecified numbers.[33]Variables allow mathematicians to describe the operations that have to be done on the numbers represented usingmathematical formulas.[34]

Until the 19th century, algebra consisted mainly of the study oflinear equations(presentlylinear algebra), and polynomial equations in a singleunknown,which were calledalgebraic equations(a term still in use, although it may be ambiguous). During the 19th century, mathematicians began to use variables to represent things other than numbers (such asmatrices,modular integers,andgeometric transformations), on which generalizations of arithmetic operations are often valid.[35]The concept ofalgebraic structureaddresses this, consisting of asetwhose elements are unspecified, of operations acting on the elements of the set, and rules that these operations must follow. The scope of algebra thus grew to include the study of algebraic structures. This object of algebra was calledmodern algebraorabstract algebra,as established by the influence and works ofEmmy Noether.[36]

Some types of algebraic structures have useful and often fundamental properties, in many areas of mathematics. Their study became autonomous parts of algebra, and include:[14]

The study of types of algebraic structures asmathematical objectsis the purpose ofuniversal algebraandcategory theory.[37]The latter applies to everymathematical structure(not only algebraic ones). At its origin, it was introduced, together with homological algebra for allowing the algebraic study of non-algebraic objects such astopological spaces;this particular area of application is calledalgebraic topology.[38]

Calculus and analysis

ACauchy sequenceconsists of elements such that all subsequent terms of a term become arbitrarily close to each other as the sequence progresses (from left to right).

Calculus, formerly called infinitesimal calculus, was introduced independently and simultaneously by 17th-century mathematiciansNewtonandLeibniz.[39]It is fundamentally the study of the relationship of variables that depend on each other. Calculus was expanded in the 18th century byEulerwith the introduction of the concept of afunctionand many other results.[40]Presently, "calculus" refers mainly to the elementary part of this theory, and "analysis" is commonly used for advanced parts.[41]

Analysis is further subdivided intoreal analysis,where variables representreal numbers,andcomplex analysis,where variables representcomplex numbers.Analysis includes many subareas shared by other areas of mathematics which include:[14]

Discrete mathematics

A diagram representing a two-stateMarkov chain.The states are represented by 'A' and 'E'. The numbers are the probability of flipping the state.

Discrete mathematics, broadly speaking, is the study of individual,countablemathematical objects. An example is the set of all integers.[42]Because the objects of study here are discrete, the methods of calculus and mathematical analysis do not directly apply.[c]Algorithms—especially theirimplementationandcomputational complexity—play a major role in discrete mathematics.[43]

Thefour color theoremandoptimal sphere packingwere two major problems of discrete mathematics solved in the second half of the 20th century.[44]TheP versus NP problem,which remains open to this day, is also important for discrete mathematics, since its solution would potentially impact a large number ofcomputationally difficultproblems.[45]

Discrete mathematics includes:[14]

Mathematical logic and set theory

A blue and pink circle and their intersection labeled
TheVenn diagramis a commonly used method to illustrate the relations between sets.

The two subjects of mathematical logic and set theory have belonged to mathematics since the end of the 19th century.[46][47]Before this period, sets were not considered to be mathematical objects, andlogic,although used for mathematical proofs, belonged tophilosophyand was not specifically studied by mathematicians.[48]

BeforeCantor's study ofinfinite sets,mathematicians were reluctant to consideractually infinitecollections, and consideredinfinityto be the result of endlessenumeration.Cantor's work offended many mathematicians not only by considering actually infinite sets[49]but by showing that this implies different sizes of infinity, perCantor's diagonal argument.This led to thecontroversy over Cantor's set theory.[50]In the same period, various areas of mathematics concluded the former intuitive definitions of the basic mathematical objects were insufficient for ensuringmathematical rigour.[51]

This became the foundational crisis of mathematics.[52]It was eventually solved in mainstream mathematics by systematizing the axiomatic method inside aformalized set theory.Roughly speaking, each mathematical object is defined by the set of all similar objects and the properties that these objects must have.[12]For example, inPeano arithmetic,the natural numbers are defined by "zero is a number", "each number has a unique successor", "each number but zero has a unique predecessor", and some rules of reasoning.[53]Thismathematical abstractionfrom reality is embodied in the modern philosophy offormalism,as founded byDavid Hilbertaround 1910.[54]

The "nature" of the objects defined this way is a philosophical problem that mathematicians leave to philosophers, even if many mathematicians have opinions on this nature, and use their opinion—sometimes called "intuition" —to guide their study and proofs. The approach allows considering "logics" (that is, sets of allowed deducing rules), theorems, proofs, etc. as mathematical objects, and to prove theorems about them. For example,Gödel's incompleteness theoremsassert, roughly speaking that, in everyconsistentformal systemthat contains the natural numbers, there are theorems that are true (that is provable in a stronger system), but not provable inside the system.[55]This approach to the foundations of mathematics was challenged during the first half of the 20th century by mathematicians led byBrouwer,who promotedintuitionistic logic,which explicitly lacks thelaw of excluded middle.[56][57]

These problems and debates led to a wide expansion of mathematical logic, with subareas such asmodel theory(modeling some logical theories inside other theories),proof theory,type theory,computability theoryandcomputational complexity theory.[14]Although these aspects of mathematical logic were introduced before the rise ofcomputers,their use incompilerdesign,formal verification,program analysis,proof assistantsand other aspects ofcomputer science,contributed in turn to the expansion of these logical theories.[58]

Statistics and other decision sciences

Whatever the form of a random populationdistribution(μ), the samplingmean(x̄) tends to aGaussiandistribution and itsvariance(σ) is given by thecentral limit theoremof probability theory.[59]

The field of statistics is a mathematical application that is employed for the collection and processing of data samples, using procedures based on mathematical methods especiallyprobability theory.Statisticians generate data withrandom samplingor randomizedexperiments.[60]

Statistical theorystudiesdecision problemssuch as minimizing therisk(expected loss) of a statistical action, such as using aprocedurein, for example,parameter estimation,hypothesis testing,andselecting the best.In these traditional areas ofmathematical statistics,a statistical-decision problem is formulated by minimizing anobjective function,like expected loss orcost,under specific constraints. For example, designing a survey often involves minimizing the cost of estimating a population mean with a given level of confidence.[61]Because of its use ofoptimization,the mathematical theory of statistics overlaps with otherdecision sciences,such asoperations research,control theory,andmathematical economics.[62]

Computational mathematics

Computational mathematics is the study ofmathematical problemsthat are typically too large for human, numerical capacity.[63][64]Numerical analysisstudies methods for problems inanalysisusingfunctional analysisandapproximation theory;numerical analysis broadly includes the study ofapproximationanddiscretizationwith special focus onrounding errors.[65]Numerical analysis and, more broadly, scientific computing also study non-analytic topics of mathematical science, especially algorithmic-matrix-and-graph theory.Other areas of computational mathematics includecomputer algebraandsymbolic computation.

History

Etymology

The wordmathematicscomes from theAncient Greekwordmáthēma(μάθημα), meaning'something learned, knowledge, mathematics',and the derived expressionmathēmatikḗ tékhnē(μαθηματικὴ τέχνη), meaning'mathematical science'.It entered the English language during theLate Middle Englishperiod through French and Latin.[66]

Similarly, one of the two main schools of thought inPythagoreanismwas known as themathēmatikoi(μαθηματικοί)—which at the time meant "learners" rather than "mathematicians" in the modern sense. The Pythagoreans were likely the first to constrain the use of the word to just the study ofarithmeticand geometry. By the time ofAristotle(384–322 BC) this meaning was fully established.[67]

In Latin and English, until around 1700, the termmathematicsmore commonly meant "astrology"(or sometimes"astronomy") rather than" mathematics "; the meaning gradually changed to its present one from about 1500 to 1800. This change has resulted in several mistranslations: For example,Saint Augustine's warning that Christians should beware ofmathematici,meaning "astrologers", is sometimes mistranslated as a condemnation of mathematicians.[68]

The apparentpluralform in English goes back to the Latinneuterpluralmathematica(Cicero), based on the Greek pluralta mathēmatiká(τὰ μαθηματικά) and means roughly "all things mathematical", although it is plausible that English borrowed only the adjectivemathematic(al)and formed the nounmathematicsanew, after the pattern ofphysicsandmetaphysics,inherited from Greek.[69]In English, the nounmathematicstakes a singular verb. It is often shortened tomaths[70]or, in North America,math.[71]

Ancient

The Babylonian mathematical tabletPlimpton 322,dated to 1800 BC

In addition to recognizing how tocountphysical objects,prehistoricpeoples may have also known how to count abstract quantities, like time—days, seasons, or years.[72][73]Evidence for more complex mathematics does not appear until around 3000BC,when theBabyloniansand Egyptians began using arithmetic, algebra, and geometry for taxation and other financial calculations, for building and construction, and for astronomy.[74]The oldest mathematical texts fromMesopotamiaandEgyptare from 2000 to 1800 BC.[75]Many early texts mentionPythagorean triplesand so, by inference, thePythagorean theoremseems to be the most ancient and widespread mathematical concept after basic arithmetic and geometry. It is in Babylonian mathematics thatelementary arithmetic(addition,subtraction,multiplication,anddivision) first appear in the archaeological record. The Babylonians also possessed a place-value system and used asexagesimalnumeral system which is still in use today for measuring angles and time.[76]

In the 6th century BC,Greek mathematicsbegan to emerge as a distinct discipline and someAncient Greekssuch as thePythagoreansappeared to have considered it a subject in its own right.[77]Around 300 BC,Euclidorganized mathematical knowledge by way of postulates and first principles, which evolved into the axiomatic method that is used in mathematics today, consisting of definition, axiom, theorem, and proof.[78]His book,Elements,is widely considered the most successful and influential textbook of all time.[79]The greatest mathematician of antiquity is often held to beArchimedes(c. 287– c. 212 BC) ofSyracuse.[80]He developed formulas for calculating the surface area and volume ofsolids of revolutionand used themethod of exhaustionto calculate theareaunder the arc of aparabolawith thesummation of an infinite series,in a manner not too dissimilar from modern calculus.[81]Other notable achievements of Greek mathematics areconic sections(Apollonius of Perga,3rd century BC),[82]trigonometry(Hipparchus of Nicaea,2nd century BC),[83]and the beginnings of algebra (Diophantus, 3rd century AD).[84]

The numerals used in theBakhshali manuscript,dated between the 2nd century BC and the 2nd century AD

TheHindu–Arabic numeral systemand the rules for the use of its operations, in use throughout the world today, evolved over the course of the first millennium AD inIndiaand were transmitted to theWestern worldviaIslamic mathematics.[85]Other notable developments of Indian mathematics include the modern definition and approximation ofsineandcosine,and an early form ofinfinite series.[86][87]

Medieval and later

A page fromal-Khwarizmi'sAl-Jabr

During theGolden Age of Islam,especially during the 9th and 10th centuries, mathematics saw many important innovations building on Greek mathematics. The most notable achievement of Islamic mathematics was the development ofalgebra.Other achievements of the Islamic period include advances inspherical trigonometryand the addition of thedecimal pointto the Arabic numeral system.[88]Many notable mathematicians from this period were Persian, such asAl-Khwarizmi,Omar KhayyamandSharaf al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī.[89]The Greek and Arabic mathematical texts were in turn translated to Latin during the Middle Ages and made available in Europe.[90]

During theearly modern period,mathematics began to develop at an accelerating pace inWestern Europe,with innovations that revolutionized mathematics, such as the introduction of variables andsymbolic notationbyFrançois Viète(1540–1603), the introduction oflogarithmsbyJohn Napierin 1614, which greatly simplified numerical calculations, especially forastronomyandmarine navigation,the introduction of coordinates byRené Descartes(1596–1650) for reducing geometry to algebra, and the development of calculus byIsaac Newton(1643–1727) andGottfried Leibniz(1646–1716).Leonhard Euler(1707–1783), the most notable mathematician of the 18th century, unified these innovations into a single corpus with a standardized terminology, and completed them with the discovery and the proof of numerous theorems.[91]

Carl Friedrich Gauss

Perhaps the foremost mathematician of the 19th century was the German mathematicianCarl Gauss,who made numerous contributions to fields such as algebra, analysis,differential geometry,matrix theory,number theory, andstatistics.[92]In the early 20th century,Kurt Gödeltransformed mathematics by publishinghis incompleteness theorems,which show in part that any consistent axiomatic system—if powerful enough to describe arithmetic—will contain true propositions that cannot be proved.[55]

Mathematics has since been greatly extended, and there has been a fruitful interaction between mathematics andscience,to the benefit of both. Mathematical discoveries continue to be made to this very day. According to Mikhail B. Sevryuk, in the January 2006 issue of theBulletin of the American Mathematical Society,"The number of papers and books included in theMathematical Reviews(MR) database since 1940 (the first year of operation of MR) is now more than 1.9 million, and more than 75 thousand items are added to the database each year. The overwhelming majority of works in this ocean contain new mathematical theorems and their proofs. "[93]

Symbolic notation and terminology

An explanation of the sigma (Σ)summationnotation

Mathematical notation is widely used in science andengineeringfor representing complexconceptsandpropertiesin a concise, unambiguous, and accurate way. This notation consists ofsymbolsused for representingoperations,unspecified numbers,relationsand any other mathematical objects, and then assembling them intoexpressionsand formulas.[94]More precisely, numbers and other mathematical objects are represented by symbols called variables, which are generallyLatinorGreekletters, and often includesubscripts.Operation and relations are generally represented by specificsymbolsorglyphs,[95]such as+(plus),×(multiplication),(integral),=(equal), and<(less than).[96]All these symbols are generally grouped according to specific rules to form expressions and formulas.[97]Normally, expressions and formulas do not appear alone, but are included in sentences of the current language, where expressions play the role ofnoun phrasesand formulas play the role ofclauses.

Mathematics has developed a rich terminology covering a broad range of fields that study the properties of various abstract, idealized objects and how they interact. It is based on rigorousdefinitionsthat provide a standard foundation for communication. An axiom orpostulateis a mathematical statement that is taken to be true without need of proof. If a mathematical statement has yet to be proven (or disproven), it is termed aconjecture.Through a series of rigorous arguments employingdeductive reasoning,a statement that isprovento be true becomes a theorem. A specialized theorem that is mainly used to prove another theorem is called alemma.A proven instance that forms part of a more general finding is termed acorollary.[98]

Numerous technical terms used in mathematics areneologisms,such aspolynomialandhomeomorphism.[99]Other technical terms are words of the common language that are used in an accurate meaning that may differ slightly from their common meaning. For example, in mathematics, "or"means" one, the other or both ", while, in common language, it is either ambiguous or means" one or the other but not both "(in mathematics, the latter is called"exclusive or"). Finally, many mathematical terms are common words that are used with a completely different meaning.[100]This may lead to sentences that are correct and true mathematical assertions, but appear to be nonsense to people who do not have the required background. For example, "everyfree moduleisflat"and" afieldis always aring".

Relationship with sciences

Mathematics is used in mostsciencesformodelingphenomena, which then allows predictions to be made from experimental laws.[101]The independence of mathematical truth from any experimentation implies that the accuracy of such predictions depends only on the adequacy of the model.[102]Inaccurate predictions, rather than being caused by invalid mathematical concepts, imply the need to change the mathematical model used.[103]For example, theperihelion precession of Mercurycould only be explained after the emergence ofEinstein'sgeneral relativity,which replacedNewton's law of gravitationas a better mathematical model.[104]

There is still aphilosophicaldebate whether mathematics is a science. However, in practice, mathematicians are typically grouped with scientists, and mathematics shares much in common with the physical sciences. Like them, it isfalsifiable,which means in mathematics that, if a result or a theory is wrong, this can be proved by providing acounterexample.Similarly as in science,theoriesand results (theorems) are often obtained fromexperimentation.[105]In mathematics, the experimentation may consist of computation on selected examples or of the study of figures or other representations of mathematical objects (often mind representations without physical support). For example, when asked how he came about his theorems, Gauss once replied "durch planmässiges Tattonieren" (through systematic experimentation).[106]However, some authors emphasize that mathematics differs from the modern notion of science by notrelyingon empirical evidence.[107][108][109][110]

Pure and applied mathematics

Isaac Newton
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz
Isaac Newton (left) andGottfried Wilhelm Leibnizdeveloped infinitesimal calculus.

Until the 19th century, the development of mathematics in the West was mainly motivated by the needs oftechnologyand science, and there was no clear distinction between pure and applied mathematics.[111]For example, the natural numbers and arithmetic were introduced for the need of counting, and geometry was motivated by surveying, architecture and astronomy. Later,Isaac Newtonintroduced infinitesimal calculus for explaining the movement of theplanetswith his law of gravitation. Moreover, most mathematicians were also scientists, and many scientists were also mathematicians.[112]However, a notable exception occurred with the tradition ofpure mathematics in Ancient Greece.[113]The problem ofinteger factorization,for example, which goes back toEuclidin 300 BC, had no practical application before its use in theRSA cryptosystem,now widely used for the security ofcomputer networks.[114]

In the 19th century, mathematicians such asKarl WeierstrassandRichard Dedekindincreasingly focused their research on internal problems, that is,pure mathematics.[111][115]This led to split mathematics intopure mathematicsandapplied mathematics,the latter being often considered as having a lower value among mathematical purists. However, the lines between the two are frequently blurred.[116]

The aftermath ofWorld War IIled to a surge in the development of applied mathematics in the US and elsewhere.[117][118]Many of the theories developed for applications were found interesting from the point of view of pure mathematics, and many results of pure mathematics were shown to have applications outside mathematics; in turn, the study of these applications may give new insights on the "pure theory".[119][120]

An example of the first case is thetheory of distributions,introduced byLaurent Schwartzfor validating computations done inquantum mechanics,which became immediately an important tool of (pure) mathematical analysis.[121]An example of the second case is thedecidability of the first-order theory of the real numbers,a problem of pure mathematics that was proved true byAlfred Tarski,with an algorithm that is impossible toimplementbecause of a computational complexity that is much too high.[122]For getting an algorithm that can be implemented and can solve systems of polynomial equations and inequalities,George Collinsintroduced thecylindrical algebraic decompositionthat became a fundamental tool inreal algebraic geometry.[123]

In the present day, the distinction between pure and applied mathematics is more a question of personal research aim of mathematicians than a division of mathematics into broad areas.[124][125]The Mathematics Subject Classification has a section for "general applied mathematics" but does not mention "pure mathematics".[14]However, these terms are still used in names of someuniversitydepartments, such as at theFaculty of Mathematicsat theUniversity of Cambridge.

Unreasonable effectiveness

Theunreasonable effectiveness of mathematicsis a phenomenon that was named and first made explicit by physicistEugene Wigner.[3]It is the fact that many mathematical theories (even the "purest" ) have applications outside their initial object. These applications may be completely outside their initial area of mathematics, and may concern physical phenomena that were completely unknown when the mathematical theory was introduced.[126]Examples of unexpected applications of mathematical theories can be found in many areas of mathematics.

A notable example is theprime factorizationof natural numbers that was discovered more than 2,000 years before its common use for secureinternetcommunications through theRSA cryptosystem.[127]A second historical example is the theory ofellipses.They were studied by theancient Greek mathematiciansasconic sections(that is, intersections ofconeswith planes). It was almost 2,000 years later thatJohannes Keplerdiscovered that thetrajectoriesof the planets are ellipses.[128]

In the 19th century, the internal development of geometry (pure mathematics) led to definition and study of non-Euclidean geometries, spaces of dimension higher than three andmanifolds.At this time, these concepts seemed totally disconnected from the physical reality, but at the beginning of the 20th century,Albert Einsteindeveloped thetheory of relativitythat uses fundamentally these concepts. In particular,spacetimeofspecial relativityis a non-Euclidean space of dimension four, and spacetime ofgeneral relativityis a (curved) manifold of dimension four.[129][130]

A striking aspect of the interaction between mathematics and physics is when mathematics drives research in physics. This is illustrated by the discoveries of thepositronand thebaryonIn both cases, the equations of the theories had unexplained solutions, which led to conjecture of the existence of an unknownparticle,and the search for these particles. In both cases, these particles were discovered a few years later by specific experiments.[131][132][133]

Specific sciences

Physics

Diagram of a pendulum

Mathematics and physics have influenced each other over their modern history. Modern physics uses mathematics abundantly,[134]and is also considered to be the motivation of major mathematical developments.[135]

Computing

Computing is closely related to mathematics in several ways.[136]Theoretical computer scienceis considered to be mathematical in nature.[137]Communication technologies apply branches of mathematics that may be very old (e.g., arithmetic), especially with respect to transmission security, incryptographyandcoding theory.Discrete mathematicsis useful in many areas of computer science, such ascomplexity theory,information theory,andgraph theory.[138]In 1998, theKepler conjectureonsphere packingseemed to also be partially proven by computer.[139]

Biology and chemistry

The skin of thisgiant pufferfishexhibits aTuring pattern,which can be modeled byreaction–diffusion systems.

Biologyuses probability extensively in fields such as ecology orneurobiology.[140]Most discussion of probability centers on the concept ofevolutionary fitness.[140]Ecology heavily uses modeling to simulatepopulation dynamics,[140][141]study ecosystems such as the predator-prey model, measure pollution diffusion,[142]or to assess climate change.[143]The dynamics of a population can be modeled by coupled differential equations, such as theLotka–Volterra equations.[144]

Statistical hypothesis testing,is run on data fromclinical trialsto determine whether a new treatment works.[145]Since the start of the 20th century, chemistry has used computing to model molecules in three dimensions.[146]

Earth sciences

Structural geologyand climatology use probabilistic models to predict the risk of natural catastrophes.[147]Similarly,meteorology,oceanography,andplanetologyalso use mathematics due to their heavy use of models.[148][149][150]

Social sciences

Areas of mathematics used in the social sciences include probability/statistics and differential equations. These are used in linguistics,economics,sociology,[151]andpsychology.[152]

Supply and demandcurves, like this one, are a staple of mathematical economics.

Often the fundamental postulate of mathematical economics is that of the rational individual actor –Homo economicus(lit.'economic man').[153]In this model, the individual seeks to maximize theirself-interest,[153]and always makes optimal choices usingperfect information.[154]This atomistic view of economics allows it to relatively easily mathematize its thinking, because individualcalculationsare transposed into mathematical calculations. Such mathematical modeling allows one to probe economic mechanisms. Some reject or criticise the concept ofHomo economicus.Economists note that real people have limited information, make poor choices and care about fairness, altruism, not just personal gain.[155]

Without mathematical modeling, it is hard to go beyond statistical observations or untestable speculation. Mathematical modeling allows economists to create structured frameworks to test hypotheses and analyze complex interactions. Models provide clarity and precision, enabling the translation of theoretical concepts into quantifiable predictions that can be tested against real-world data.[156]

At the start of the 20th century, there was a development to express historical movements in formulas. In 1922,Nikolai Kondratievdiscerned the ~50-year-longKondratiev cycle,which explains phases of economic growth or crisis.[157]Towards the end of the 19th century, mathematicians extended their analysis intogeopolitics.[158]Peter Turchindevelopedcliodynamicssince the 1990s.[159]

Mathematization of the social sciences is not without risk. In the controversial bookFashionable Nonsense(1997),SokalandBricmontdenounced the unfounded or abusive use of scientific terminology, particularly from mathematics or physics, in the social sciences.[160]The study ofcomplex systems(evolution of unemployment, business capital, demographic evolution of a population, etc.) uses mathematical knowledge. However, the choice of counting criteria, particularly for unemployment, or of models, can be subject to controversy.[161][162]

Philosophy

Reality

The connection between mathematics and material reality has led to philosophical debates since at least the time ofPythagoras.The ancient philosopherPlatoargued that abstractions that reflect material reality have themselves a reality that exists outside space and time. As a result, the philosophical view that mathematical objects somehow exist on their own in abstraction is often referred to asPlatonism.Independently of their possible philosophical opinions, modern mathematicians may be generally considered as Platonists, since they think of and talk of their objects of study as real objects.[163]

Armand Borelsummarized this view of mathematics reality as follows, and provided quotations ofG. H. Hardy,Charles Hermite,Henri Poincaréand Albert Einstein that support his views.[131]

Something becomes objective (as opposed to "subjective" ) as soon as we are convinced that it exists in the minds of others in the same form as it does in ours and that we can think about it and discuss it together.[164]Because the language of mathematics is so precise, it is ideally suited to defining concepts for which such a consensus exists. In my opinion, that is sufficient to provide us with afeelingof an objective existence, of a reality of mathematics...

Nevertheless, Platonism and the concurrent views on abstraction do not explain theunreasonable effectivenessof mathematics.[165]

Proposed definitions

There is no general consensus about the definition of mathematics or itsepistemological status—that is, its place inside knowledge. A great many professional mathematicians take no interest in a definition of mathematics, or consider it undefinable. There is not even consensus on whether mathematics is an art or a science. Some just say, "mathematics is what mathematicians do".[166][167]A common approach is to define mathematics by its object of study.[168][169][170][171]

Aristotle defined mathematics as "the science of quantity" and this definition prevailed until the 18th century. However, Aristotle also noted a focus on quantity alone may not distinguish mathematics from sciences like physics; in his view, abstraction and studying quantity as a property "separable in thought" from real instances set mathematics apart.[172]In the 19th century, when mathematicians began to address topics—such as infinite sets—which have no clear-cut relation to physical reality, a variety of new definitions were given.[173]With the large number of new areas of mathematics that have appeared since the beginning of the 20th century, defining mathematics by its object of study has become increasingly difficult.[174]For example, in lieu of a definition,Saunders Mac LaneinMathematics, form and functionsummarizes the basics of several areas of mathematics, emphasizing their inter-connectedness, and observes:[175]

the development of Mathematics provides a tightly connected network of formal rules, concepts, and systems. Nodes of this network are closely bound to procedures useful in human activities and to questions arising in science. The transition from activities to the formal Mathematical systems is guided by a variety of general insights and ideas.

Another approach for defining mathematics is to use its methods. For example, an area of study is often qualified as mathematics as soon as one can prove theorems—assertions whose validity relies on a proof, that is, a purely-logical deduction.[d][176][failed verification]

Rigor

Mathematical reasoning requiresrigor.This means that the definitions must be absolutely unambiguous and theproofsmust be reducible to a succession of applications ofinference rules,[e]without any use of empirical evidence andintuition.[f][177]Rigorous reasoning is not specific to mathematics, but, in mathematics, the standard of rigor is much higher than elsewhere. Despite mathematics'concision,rigorous proofs can require hundreds of pages to express, such as the 255-pageFeit–Thompson theorem.[g]The emergence ofcomputer-assisted proofshas allowed proof lengths to further expand.[h][178]The result of this trend is a philosophy of thequasi-empiricistproof that can not be considered infallible, but has a probability attached to it.[6]

The concept of rigor in mathematics dates back to ancient Greece, where their society encouraged logical, deductive reasoning. However, this rigorous approach would tend to discourage exploration of new approaches, such as irrational numbers and concepts of infinity. The method of demonstrating rigorous proof was enhanced in the sixteenth century through the use of symbolic notation. In the 18th century, social transition led to mathematicians earning their keep through teaching, which led to more careful thinking about the underlying concepts of mathematics. This produced more rigorous approaches, while transitioning from geometric methods to algebraic and then arithmetic proofs.[6]

At the end of the 19th century, it appeared that the definitions of the basic concepts of mathematics were not accurate enough for avoiding paradoxes (non-Euclidean geometries andWeierstrass function) and contradictions (Russell's paradox). This was solved by the inclusion of axioms with theapodicticinference rules of mathematical theories; the re-introduction of axiomatic method pioneered by the ancient Greeks.[6]It results that "rigor" is no more a relevant concept in mathematics, as a proof is either correct or erroneous, and a "rigorous proof" is simply apleonasm.Where a special concept of rigor comes into play is in the socialized aspects of a proof, wherein it may be demonstrably refuted by other mathematicians. After a proof has been accepted for many years or even decades, it can then be considered as reliable.[179]

Nevertheless, the concept of "rigor" may remain useful for teaching to beginners what is a mathematical proof.[180]

Training and practice

Education

Mathematics has a remarkable ability to cross cultural boundaries and time periods. As ahuman activity,the practice of mathematics has a social side, which includeseducation,careers,recognition,popularization,and so on. In education, mathematics is a core part of the curriculum and forms an important element of theSTEMacademic disciplines. Prominent careers for professional mathematicians include math teacher or professor,statistician,actuary,financial analyst,economist,accountant,commodity trader,orcomputer consultant.[181]

Archaeological evidence shows that instruction in mathematics occurred as early as the second millennium BCE in ancient Babylonia.[182]Comparable evidence has been unearthed for scribal mathematics training in theancient Near Eastand then for theGreco-Roman worldstarting around 300 BCE.[183]The oldest known mathematics textbook is theRhind papyrus,dated fromc. 1650 BCEin Egypt.[184]Due to a scarcity of books, mathematical teachings in ancient India were communicated using memorizedoral traditionsince theVedic period(c. 1500– c. 500 BCE).[185]InImperial Chinaduring theTang dynasty(618–907 CE), a mathematics curriculum was adopted for thecivil service examto join the state bureaucracy.[186]

Following theDark Ages,mathematics education in Europe was provided by religious schools as part of theQuadrivium.Formal instruction inpedagogybegan withJesuitschools in the 16th and 17th century. Most mathematical curricula remained at a basic and practical level until the nineteenth century, when it began to flourish in France and Germany. The oldest journal addressing instruction in mathematics wasL'Enseignement Mathématique,which began publication in 1899.[187]The Western advancements in science and technology led to the establishment of centralized education systems in many nation-states, with mathematics as a core component—initially for its military applications.[188]While the content of courses varies, in the present day nearly all countries teach mathematics to students for significant amounts of time.[189]

During school, mathematical capabilities and positive expectations have a strong association with career interest in the field. Extrinsic factors such as feedback motivation by teachers, parents, and peer groups can influence the level of interest in mathematics.[190]Some students studying math may develop an apprehension or fear about their performance in the subject. This is known asmath anxietyor math phobia, and is considered the most prominent of the disorders impacting academic performance. Math anxiety can develop due to various factors such as parental and teacher attitudes, social stereotypes, and personal traits. Help to counteract the anxiety can come from changes in instructional approaches, by interactions with parents and teachers, and by tailored treatments for the individual.[191]

Psychology (aesthetic, creativity and intuition)

The validity of a mathematical theorem relies only on the rigor of its proof, which could theoretically be done automatically by acomputer program.This does not mean that there is no place for creativity in a mathematical work. On the contrary, many important mathematical results (theorems) are solutions of problems that other mathematicians failed to solve, and the invention of a way for solving them may be a fundamental way of the solving process.[192][193]An extreme example isApery's theorem:Roger Aperyprovided only the ideas for a proof, and the formal proof was given only several months later by three other mathematicians.[194]

Creativity and rigor are not the only psychological aspects of the activity of mathematicians. Some mathematicians can see their activity as a game, more specifically as solvingpuzzles.[195]This aspect of mathematical activity is emphasized inrecreational mathematics.

Mathematicians can find anaestheticvalue to mathematics. Likebeauty,it is hard to define, it is commonly related toelegance,which involves qualities likesimplicity,symmetry,completeness, and generality. G. H. Hardy inA Mathematician's Apologyexpressed the belief that the aesthetic considerations are, in themselves, sufficient to justify the study of pure mathematics. He also identified other criteria such as significance, unexpectedness, and inevitability, which contribute to mathematical aesthetics.[196]Paul Erdősexpressed this sentiment more ironically by speaking of "The Book", a supposed divine collection of the most beautiful proofs. The 1998 bookProofs from THE BOOK,inspired by Erdős, is a collection of particularly succinct and revelatory mathematical arguments. Some examples of particularly elegant results included are Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many prime numbers and thefast Fourier transformforharmonic analysis.[197]

Some feel that to consider mathematics a science is to downplay its artistry and history in the seven traditionalliberal arts.[198]One way this difference of viewpoint plays out is in the philosophical debate as to whether mathematical results arecreated(as in art) ordiscovered(as in science).[131]The popularity of recreational mathematics is another sign of the pleasure many find in solving mathematical questions.

Cultural impact

Artistic expression

Notes that sound well together to a Western ear are sounds whose fundamentalfrequenciesof vibration are in simple ratios. For example, an octave doubles the frequency and aperfect fifthmultiplies it by.[199][200]

Fractalwith a scaling symmetry and a central symmetry

Humans, as well as some other animals, find symmetric patterns to be more beautiful.[201]Mathematically, the symmetries of an object form a group known as thesymmetry group.[202]For example, the group underlying mirror symmetry is thecyclic groupof two elements,.ARorschach testis a figure invariant by this symmetry,[203]as arebutterflyand animal bodies more generally (at least on the surface).[204]Waves on the sea surface possess translation symmetry: moving one's viewpoint by the distance between wave crests does not change one's view of the sea.[205]Fractalspossessself-similarity.[206][207]

Popularization

Popular mathematics is the act of presenting mathematics without technical terms.[208]Presenting mathematics may be hard since the general public suffers frommathematical anxietyand mathematical objects are highly abstract.[209]However, popular mathematics writing can overcome this by using applications or cultural links.[210]Despite this, mathematics is rarely the topic of popularization in printed or televised media.

Awards and prize problems

The front side of theFields Medalwith an illustration of the GreekpolymathArchimedes

The most prestigious award in mathematics is theFields Medal,[211][212]established in 1936 and awarded every four years (except aroundWorld War II) to up to four individuals.[213][214]It is considered the mathematical equivalent of theNobel Prize.[214]

Other prestigious mathematics awards include:[215]

A famous list of 23open problems,called "Hilbert's problems",was compiled in 1900 by German mathematician David Hilbert.[223]This list has achieved great celebrity among mathematicians,[224]and at least thirteen of the problems (depending how some are interpreted) have been solved.[223]

A new list of seven important problems, titled the "Millennium Prize Problems",was published in 2000. Only one of them, theRiemann hypothesis,duplicates one of Hilbert's problems. A solution to any of these problems carries a 1 million dollar reward.[225]To date, only one of these problems, thePoincaré conjecture,has been solved by the Russian mathematicianGrigori Perelman.[226]

See also

References

Notes

  1. ^Here,algebrais taken in its modern sense, which is, roughly speaking, the art of manipulatingformulas.
  2. ^This includesconic sections,which are intersections ofcircular cylindersand planes.
  3. ^However, some advanced methods of analysis are sometimes used; for example, methods ofcomplex analysisapplied togenerating series.
  4. ^For example, logic belongs to philosophy sinceAristotle.Circa the end of the 19th century, thefoundational crisis of mathematicsimplied developments of logic that are specific to mathematics. This allowed eventually the proof of theorems such asGödel's theorems.Since then,mathematical logicis commonly considered as an area of mathematics.
  5. ^This does not mean to make explicit all inference rules that are used. On the contrary, this is generally impossible, withoutcomputersandproof assistants.Even with this modern technology, it may take years of human work for writing down a completely detailed proof.
  6. ^This does not mean that empirical evidence and intuition are not needed for choosing the theorems to be proved and to prove them.
  7. ^This is the length of the original paper that does not contain the proofs of some previously published auxiliary results. The book devoted to the complete proof has more than 1,000 pages.
  8. ^For considering as reliable a large computation occurring in a proof, one generally requires two computations using independent software

Citations

  1. ^Hipólito, Inês Viegas (August 9–15, 2015). "Abstract Cognition and the Nature of Mathematical Proof". In Kanzian, Christian;Mitterer, Josef;Neges, Katharina (eds.).Realismus – Relativismus – Konstruktivismus: Beiträge des 38. Internationalen Wittgenstein Symposiums[Realism – Relativism – Constructivism: Contributions of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium](PDF)(in German and English). Vol. 23. Kirchberg am Wechsel, Austria: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 132–134.ISSN1022-3398.OCLC236026294.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 7, 2022.RetrievedJanuary 17,2024.(at ResearchGateOpen access iconArchivedNovember 5, 2022, at theWayback Machine)
  2. ^Peterson 1988,p. 12.
  3. ^abWigner, Eugene(1960)."The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences".Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics.13(1): 1–14.Bibcode:1960CPAM...13....1W.doi:10.1002/cpa.3160130102.S2CID6112252.Archivedfrom the original on February 28, 2011.
  4. ^Wise, David."Eudoxus' Influence on Euclid's Elements with a close look at The Method of Exhaustion".The University of Georgia.Archivedfrom the original on June 1, 2019.RetrievedJanuary 18,2024.
  5. ^Alexander, Amir(September 2011). "The Skeleton in the Closet: Should Historians of Science Care about the History of Mathematics?".Isis.102(3): 475–480.doi:10.1086/661620.ISSN0021-1753.MR2884913.PMID22073771.S2CID21629993.
  6. ^abcdefKleiner, Israel(December 1991). "Rigor and Proof in Mathematics: A Historical Perspective".Mathematics Magazine.64(5). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 291–314.doi:10.1080/0025570X.1991.11977625.eISSN1930-0980.ISSN0025-570X.JSTOR2690647.LCCN47003192.MR1141557.OCLC1756877.S2CID7787171.
  7. ^Bell, E. T.(1945) [1940]. "General Prospectus".The Development of Mathematics(2nd ed.). Dover Publications. p. 3.ISBN978-0-486-27239-9.LCCN45010599.OCLC523284.... mathematics has come down to the present by the two main streams of number and form. The first carried along arithmetic and algebra, the second, geometry.
  8. ^Tiwari, Sarju (1992). "A Mirror of Civilization".Mathematics in History, Culture, Philosophy, and Science(1st ed.). New Delhi, India: Mittal Publications. p. 27.ISBN978-81-7099-404-6.LCCN92909575.OCLC28115124.It is unfortunate that two curses of mathematics--Numerology and Astrology were also born with it and have been more acceptable to the masses than mathematics itself.
  9. ^Restivo, Sal(1992). "Mathematics from the Ground Up". InBunge, Mario(ed.).Mathematics in Society and History.Episteme. Vol. 20.Kluwer Academic Publishers.p. 14.ISBN0-7923-1765-3.LCCN25709270.OCLC92013695.
  10. ^Musielak, Dora(2022).Leonhard Euler and the Foundations of Celestial Mechanics.History of Physics.Springer International Publishing.doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12322-1.eISSN2730-7557.ISBN978-3-031-12321-4.ISSN2730-7549.OCLC1332780664.S2CID253240718.
  11. ^Biggs, N. L. (May 1979)."The roots of combinatorics".Historia Mathematica.6(2): 109–136.doi:10.1016/0315-0860(79)90074-0.eISSN1090-249X.ISSN0315-0860.LCCN75642280.OCLC2240703.
  12. ^abWarner, Evan."Splash Talk: The Foundational Crisis of Mathematics"(PDF).Columbia University.Archived fromthe original(PDF)on March 22, 2023.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  13. ^Dunne, Edward;Hulek, Klaus(March 2020)."Mathematics Subject Classification 2020"(PDF).Notices of the American Mathematical Society.67(3): 410–411.doi:10.1090/noti2052.eISSN1088-9477.ISSN0002-9920.LCCNsf77000404.OCLC1480366.Archived(PDF)from the original on August 3, 2021.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.The new MSC contains 63 two-digit classifications, 529 three-digit classifications, and 6,006 five-digit classifications.
  14. ^abcdefgh"MSC2020-Mathematics Subject Classification System"(PDF).zbMath.Associate Editors of Mathematical Reviews and zbMATH.Archived(PDF)from the original on January 2, 2024.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  15. ^LeVeque, William J.(1977). "Introduction".Fundamentals of Number Theory.Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.pp. 1–30.ISBN0-201-04287-8.LCCN76055645.OCLC3519779.S2CID118560854.
  16. ^Goldman, Jay R. (1998). "The Founding Fathers".The Queen of Mathematics: A Historically Motivated Guide to Number Theory.Wellesley, MA: A K Peters. pp. 2–3.doi:10.1201/9781439864623.ISBN1-56881-006-7.LCCN94020017.OCLC30437959.S2CID118934517.
  17. ^Weil, André(1983).Number Theory: An Approach Through History From Hammurapi to Legendre.Birkhäuser Boston. pp. 2–3.doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-4571-7.ISBN0-8176-3141-0.LCCN83011857.OCLC9576587.S2CID117789303.
  18. ^Kleiner, Israel(March 2000)."From Fermat to Wiles: Fermat's Last Theorem Becomes a Theorem".Elemente der Mathematik.55(1): 19–37.doi:10.1007/PL00000079.eISSN1420-8962.ISSN0013-6018.LCCN66083524.OCLC1567783.S2CID53319514.
  19. ^Wang, Yuan (2002).The Goldbach Conjecture.Series in Pure Mathematics. Vol. 4 (2nd ed.).World Scientific.pp. 1–18.doi:10.1142/5096.ISBN981-238-159-7.LCCN2003268597.OCLC51533750.S2CID14555830.
  20. ^abcStraume, Eldar (September 4, 2014). "A Survey of the Development of Geometry up to 1870".arXiv:1409.1140[math.HO].
  21. ^Hilbert, David(1902).The Foundations of Geometry.Open Court Publishing Company.p. 1.doi:10.1126/science.16.399.307.LCCN02019303.OCLC996838.S2CID238499430.RetrievedFebruary 6,2024.Free access icon
  22. ^Hartshorne, Robin(2000). "Euclid's Geometry".Geometry: Euclid and Beyond.Springer New York.pp. 9–13.ISBN0-387-98650-2.LCCN99044789.OCLC42290188.RetrievedFebruary 7,2024.
  23. ^Boyer, Carl B.(2004) [1956]. "Fermat and Descartes".History of Analytic Geometry.Dover Publications.pp. 74–102.ISBN0-486-43832-5.LCCN2004056235.OCLC56317813.
  24. ^Stump, David J. (1997)."Reconstructing the Unity of Mathematics circa 1900"(PDF).Perspectives on Science.5(3): 383–417.doi:10.1162/posc_a_00532.eISSN1530-9274.ISSN1063-6145.LCCN94657506.OCLC26085129.S2CID117709681.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  25. ^O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (February 1996)."Non-Euclidean geometry".MacTuror.Scotland, UK:University of St. Andrews.Archivedfrom the original on November 6, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  26. ^Joyner, David (2008). "The (legal) Rubik's Cube group".Adventures in Group Theory: Rubik's Cube, Merlin's Machine, and Other Mathematical Toys(2nd ed.).Johns Hopkins University Press.pp. 219–232.ISBN978-0-8018-9012-3.LCCN2008011322.OCLC213765703.
  27. ^Christianidis, Jean; Oaks, Jeffrey (May 2013)."Practicing algebra in late antiquity: The problem-solving of Diophantus of Alexandria".Historia Mathematica.40(2): 127–163.doi:10.1016/j.hm.2012.09.001.eISSN1090-249X.ISSN0315-0860.LCCN75642280.OCLC2240703.S2CID121346342.
  28. ^Kleiner 2007,"History of Classical Algebra" pp. 3–5.
  29. ^Shane, David (2022)."Figurate Numbers: A Historical Survey of an Ancient Mathematics"(PDF).Methodist University.p. 20.RetrievedJune 13,2024.In his work, Diophantus focused on deducing the arithmetic properties of figurate numbers, such as deducing the number of sides, the different ways a number can be expressed as a figurate number, and the formulation of the arithmetic progressions.
  30. ^Overbay, Shawn; Schorer, Jimmy; Conger, Heather."Al-Khwarizmi".University of Kentucky.RetrievedJune 13,2024.
  31. ^Lim, Lisa (December 21, 2018)."Where the x we use in algebra came from, and the X in Xmas".South China Morning Post.Archivedfrom the original on December 22, 2018.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  32. ^Berntjes, Sonja."Algebra".Encyclopaedia of Islam Online(3rd ed.).ISSN1573-3912.LCCN2007238847.OCLC56713464.RetrievedJune 13,2024.
  33. ^Oaks, Jeffery A. (2018)."François Viète's revolution in algebra"(PDF).Archive for History of Exact Sciences.72(3): 245–302.doi:10.1007/s00407-018-0208-0.eISSN1432-0657.ISSN0003-9519.LCCN63024699.OCLC1482042.S2CID125704699.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 8, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  34. ^"Variable in Maths".GeeksforGeeks.April 24, 2024.RetrievedJune 13,2024.
  35. ^Kleiner 2007,"History of Linear Algebra" pp. 79–101.
  36. ^Corry, Leo(2004). "Emmy Noether: Ideals and Structures".Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures(2nd revised ed.). Germany: Birkhäuser Basel. pp. 247–252.ISBN3-7643-7002-5.LCCN2004556211.OCLC51234417.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  37. ^Riche, Jacques (2007). "From Universal Algebra to Universal Logic". In Beziau, J. Y.; Costa-Leite, Alexandre (eds.).Perspectives on Universal Logic.Milano, Italy: Polimetrica International Scientific Publisher. pp. 3–39.ISBN978-88-7699-077-9.OCLC647049731.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  38. ^Krömer, Ralph (2007).Tool and Object: A History and Philosophy of Category Theory.Science Networks – Historical Studies. Vol. 32. Germany:Springer Science & Business Media.pp. xxi–xxv, 1–91.ISBN978-3-7643-7523-2.LCCN2007920230.OCLC85242858.RetrievedFebruary 8,2024.
  39. ^Guicciardini, Niccolo(2017)."The Newton–Leibniz Calculus Controversy, 1708–1730"(PDF).In Schliesser, Eric; Smeenk, Chris (eds.).The Oxford Handbook of Newton.Oxford Handbooks.Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199930418.013.9.ISBN978-0-19-993041-8.OCLC975829354.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 9, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 9,2024.
  40. ^O'Connor, J. J.; Robertson, E. F. (September 1998)."Leonhard Euler".MacTutor.Scotland, UK:University of St Andrews.Archivedfrom the original on November 9, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 9,2024.
  41. ^"Calculus (Differential and Integral Calculus with Examples)".Byju's.RetrievedJune 13,2024.
  42. ^Franklin, James(July 2017)."Discrete and Continuous: A Fundamental Dichotomy in Mathematics".Journal of Humanistic Mathematics.7(2): 355–378.doi:10.5642/jhummath.201702.18.ISSN2159-8118.LCCN2011202231.OCLC700943261.S2CID6945363.RetrievedFebruary 9,2024.
  43. ^Maurer, Stephen B. (1997)."What is Discrete Mathematics? The Many Answers".In Rosenstein, Joseph G.; Franzblau, Deborah S.;Roberts, Fred S.(eds.).Discrete Mathematics in the Schools.DIMACS: Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. Vol. 36.American Mathematical Society.pp. 121–124.doi:10.1090/dimacs/036/13.ISBN0-8218-0448-0.ISSN1052-1798.LCCN97023277.OCLC37141146.S2CID67358543.RetrievedFebruary 9,2024.
  44. ^Hales, Thomas C.(2014)."Turing's Legacy: Developments from Turing's Ideas in Logic".InDowney, Rod(ed.).Turing's Legacy.Lecture Notes in Logic. Vol. 42.Cambridge University Press.pp. 260–261.doi:10.1017/CBO9781107338579.001.ISBN978-1-107-04348-0.LCCN2014000240.OCLC867717052.S2CID19315498.RetrievedFebruary 9,2024.
  45. ^Sipser, Michael(July 1992).The History and Status of the P versus NP Question.STOC '92: Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing. pp. 603–618.doi:10.1145/129712.129771.S2CID11678884.
  46. ^Ewald, William (November 17, 2018)."The Emergence of First-Order Logic".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.ISSN1095-5054.LCCNsn97004494.OCLC37550526.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  47. ^Ferreirós, José (June 18, 2020) [First published April 10, 2007]."The Early Development of Set Theory".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.ISSN1095-5054.LCCNsn97004494.OCLC37550526.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  48. ^Ferreirós, José (December 2001)."The Road to Modern Logic—An Interpretation"(PDF).The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.7(4): 441–484.doi:10.2307/2687794.eISSN1943-5894.hdl:11441/38373.ISSN1079-8986.JSTOR2687794.LCCN95652899.OCLC31616719.S2CID43258676.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  49. ^Wolchover, Natalie,ed. (November 26, 2013)."Dispute over Infinity Divides Mathematicians".Quanta Magazine.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  50. ^Zhuang, Chaohui."Wittgenstein's analysis on Cantor's diagonal argument"(DOC).PhilArchive.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  51. ^Tanswell, Fenner Stanley (2024).Mathematical Rigour and Informal Proof.Cambridge Elements in the Philosophy of Mathematics.Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/9781009325110.eISSN2399-2883.ISBN978-1-00-949438-0.ISSN2514-3808.OCLC1418750041.
  52. ^Avigad, Jeremy;Reck, Erich H. (December 11, 2001).""Clarifying the nature of the infinite": the development of metamathematics and proof theory "(PDF).Carnegie Mellon University.RetrievedJune 14,2024.
  53. ^Hamilton, Alan G. (1982).Numbers, Sets and Axioms: The Apparatus of Mathematics.Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–4.ISBN978-0-521-28761-6.RetrievedNovember 12,2022.
  54. ^Snapper, Ernst(September 1979). "The Three Crises in Mathematics: Logicism, Intuitionism, and Formalism".Mathematics Magazine.52(4): 207–216.doi:10.2307/2689412.ISSN0025-570X.JSTOR2689412.
  55. ^abRaatikainen, Panu (October 2005)."On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems".Revue Internationale de Philosophie.59(4): 513–534.doi:10.3917/rip.234.0513.JSTOR23955909.S2CID52083793.Archivedfrom the original on November 12, 2022.RetrievedNovember 12,2022.
  56. ^Moschovakis, Joan(September 4, 2018)."Intuitionistic Logic".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Archivedfrom the original on December 16, 2022.RetrievedNovember 12,2022.
  57. ^McCarty, Charles (2006)."At the Heart of Analysis: Intuitionism and Philosophy".Philosophia Scientiæ, Cahier spécial 6:81–94.doi:10.4000/philosophiascientiae.411.
  58. ^Halpern, Joseph;Harper, Robert;Immerman, Neil;Kolaitis, Phokion;Vardi, Moshe;Vianu, Victor(2001)."On the Unusual Effectiveness of Logic in Computer Science"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on March 3, 2021.RetrievedJanuary 15,2021.
  59. ^Rouaud, Mathieu (April 2017) [First published July 2013].Probability, Statistics and Estimation(PDF).p. 10.Archived(PDF)from the original on October 9, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 13,2024.
  60. ^Rao, C. Radhakrishna(1997) [1989].Statistics and Truth: Putting Chance to Work(2nd ed.). World Scientific. pp. 3–17, 63–70.ISBN981-02-3111-3.LCCN97010349.MR1474730.OCLC36597731.
  61. ^Rao, C. Radhakrishna(1981). "Foreword". In Arthanari, T.S.;Dodge, Yadolah(eds.).Mathematical programming in statistics.Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley. pp. vii–viii.ISBN978-0-471-08073-2.LCCN80021637.MR0607328.OCLC6707805.
  62. ^Whittle 1994,pp. 10–11, 14–18.
  63. ^Marchuk, Gurii Ivanovich (April 2020)."G I Marchuk's plenary: ICM 1970".MacTutor.School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland.Archivedfrom the original on November 13, 2022.RetrievedNovember 13,2022.
  64. ^Johnson, Gary M.; Cavallini, John S. (September 1991). Phua, Kang Hoh; Loe, Kia Fock (eds.).Grand Challenges, High Performance Computing, and Computational Science.Singapore Supercomputing Conference'90: Supercomputing For Strategic Advantage. World Scientific. p. 28.LCCN91018998.RetrievedNovember 13,2022.
  65. ^Trefethen, Lloyd N.(2008). "Numerical Analysis". InGowers, Timothy;Barrow-Green, June;Leader, Imre(eds.).The Princeton Companion to Mathematics(PDF).Princeton University Press.pp. 604–615.ISBN978-0-691-11880-2.LCCN2008020450.MR2467561.OCLC227205932.Archived(PDF)from the original on March 7, 2023.RetrievedFebruary 15,2024.
  66. ^
  67. ^Perisho, Margaret W. (Spring 1965). "The Etymology of Mathematical Terms".Pi Mu Epsilon Journal.4(2): 62–66.ISSN0031-952X.JSTOR24338341.LCCN58015848.OCLC1762376.
  68. ^Boas, Ralph P.(1995). "What Augustine Didn't Say About Mathematicians". In Alexanderson, Gerald L.; Mugler, Dale H. (eds.).Lion Hunting and Other Mathematical Pursuits: A Collection of Mathematics, Verse, and Stories.Mathematical Association of America.p. 257.ISBN978-0-88385-323-8.LCCN94078313.OCLC633018890.
  69. ^The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology,Oxford English Dictionary,sub"mathematics", "mathematic", "mathematics".
  70. ^"Maths (Noun)".Oxford English Dictionary.Oxford University Press.RetrievedJanuary 25,2024.
  71. ^"Math (Noun³)".Oxford English Dictionary.Oxford University Press.Archivedfrom the original on April 4, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 25,2024.
  72. ^See, for example,Wilder, Raymond L.Evolution of Mathematical Concepts; an Elementary Study.passim.
  73. ^Zaslavsky, Claudia(1999).Africa Counts: Number and Pattern in African Culture.Chicago Review Press.ISBN978-1-61374-115-3.OCLC843204342.
  74. ^Kline 1990,Chapter 1.
  75. ^Mesopotamiapg 10. Retrieved June 1, 2024
  76. ^Boyer 1991,"Mesopotamia" pp. 24–27.
  77. ^Heath, Thomas Little(1981) [1921].A History of Greek Mathematics: From Thales to Euclid.New York: Dover Publications. p. 1.ISBN978-0-486-24073-2.
  78. ^Mueller, I. (1969). "Euclid's Elements and the Axiomatic Method".The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.20(4): 289–309.doi:10.1093/bjps/20.4.289.ISSN0007-0882.JSTOR686258.
  79. ^Boyer 1991,"Euclid of Alexandria" p. 119.
  80. ^Boyer 1991,"Archimedes of Syracuse" p. 120.
  81. ^Boyer 1991,"Archimedes of Syracuse" p. 130.
  82. ^Boyer 1991,"Apollonius of Perga" p. 145.
  83. ^Boyer 1991,"Greek Trigonometry and Mensuration" p. 162.
  84. ^Boyer 1991,"Revival and Decline of Greek Mathematics" p. 180.
  85. ^Ore, Øystein(1988).Number Theory and Its History.Courier Corporation. pp. 19–24.ISBN978-0-486-65620-5.RetrievedNovember 14,2022.
  86. ^Singh, A. N. (January 1936). "On the Use of Series in Hindu Mathematics".Osiris.1:606–628.doi:10.1086/368443.JSTOR301627.S2CID144760421.
  87. ^Kolachana, A.; Mahesh, K.; Ramasubramanian, K. (2019). "Use of series in India".Studies in Indian Mathematics and Astronomy.Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. Singapore: Springer. pp. 438–461.doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7326-8_20.ISBN978-981-13-7325-1.S2CID190176726.
  88. ^Saliba, George(1994).A history of Arabic astronomy: planetary theories during the golden age of Islam.New York University Press.ISBN978-0-8147-7962-0.OCLC28723059.
  89. ^Faruqi, Yasmeen M. (2006)."Contributions of Islamic scholars to the scientific enterprise".International Education Journal.7(4). Shannon Research Press: 391–399.Archivedfrom the original on November 14, 2022.RetrievedNovember 14,2022.
  90. ^Lorch, Richard (June 2001)."Greek-Arabic-Latin: The Transmission of Mathematical Texts in the Middle Ages"(PDF).Science in Context.14(1–2). Cambridge University Press: 313–331.doi:10.1017/S0269889701000114.S2CID146539132.Archived(PDF)from the original on December 17, 2022.RetrievedDecember 5,2022.
  91. ^Kent, Benjamin (2022).History of Science(PDF).Vol. 2. Bibliotex Digital Library.ISBN978-1-984668-67-7.
  92. ^Archibald, Raymond Clare(January 1949). "History of Mathematics After the Sixteenth Century".The American Mathematical Monthly.Part 2: Outline of the History of Mathematics.56(1): 35–56.doi:10.2307/2304570.JSTOR2304570.
  93. ^Sevryuk 2006,pp. 101–109.
  94. ^Wolfram, Stephan(October 2000).Mathematical Notation: Past and Future.MathML and Math on the Web: MathML International Conference 2000, Urbana Champaign, USA.Archivedfrom the original on November 16, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  95. ^Douglas, Heather; Headley, Marcia Gail; Hadden, Stephanie;LeFevre, Jo-Anne(December 3, 2020)."Knowledge of Mathematical Symbols Goes Beyond Numbers".Journal of Numerical Cognition.6(3): 322–354.doi:10.5964/jnc.v6i3.293.eISSN2363-8761.S2CID228085700.
  96. ^Letourneau, Mary; Wright Sharp, Jennifer (October 2017)."AMS Style Guide"(PDF).American Mathematical Society.p. 75.Archived(PDF)from the original on December 8, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  97. ^Jansen, Anthony R.; Marriott, Kim; Yelland, Greg W. (2000)."Constituent Structure in Mathematical Expressions"(PDF).Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.22.University of California Merced.eISSN1069-7977.OCLC68713073.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 16, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  98. ^Rossi, Richard J. (2006).Theorems, Corollaries, Lemmas, and Methods of Proof.Pure and Applied Mathematics: A Wiley Series of Texts, Monographs and Tracts.John Wiley & Sons.pp. 1–14, 47–48.ISBN978-0-470-04295-3.LCCN2006041609.OCLC64085024.
  99. ^"Earliest Uses of Some Words of Mathematics".MacTutor.Scotland, UK:University of St. Andrews.Archivedfrom the original on September 29, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 3,2024.
  100. ^Silver, Daniel S. (November–December 2017)."The New Language of Mathematics".The American Scientist.105(6).Sigma Xi:364–371.doi:10.1511/2017.105.6.364.ISSN0003-0996.LCCN43020253.OCLC1480717.S2CID125455764.
  101. ^Bellomo, Nicola; Preziosi, Luigi (December 22, 1994).Modelling Mathematical Methods and Scientific Computation.Mathematical Modeling. Vol. 1. CRC Press. p. 1.ISBN978-0-8493-8331-1.RetrievedNovember 16,2022.
  102. ^Hennig, Christian (2010)."Mathematical Models and Reality: A Constructivist Perspective".Foundations of Science.15:29–48.doi:10.1007/s10699-009-9167-x.S2CID6229200.RetrievedNovember 17,2022.
  103. ^Frigg, Roman;Hartmann, Stephan(February 4, 2020)."Models in Science".Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Archivedfrom the original on November 17, 2022.RetrievedNovember 17,2022.
  104. ^Stewart, Ian(2018)."Mathematics, Maps, and Models".In Wuppuluri, Shyam; Doria, Francisco Antonio (eds.).The Map and the Territory: Exploring the Foundations of Science, Thought and Reality.The Frontiers Collection. Springer. pp. 345–356.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72478-2_18.ISBN978-3-319-72478-2.RetrievedNovember 17,2022.
  105. ^"The science checklist applied: Mathematics".Understanding Science.University of California, Berkeley.Archivedfrom the original on October 27, 2019.RetrievedOctober 27,2019.
  106. ^Mackay, A. L. (1991).Dictionary of Scientific Quotations.London: Taylor & Francis. p. 100.ISBN978-0-7503-0106-0.RetrievedMarch 19,2023.
  107. ^Bishop, Alan (1991)."Environmental activities and mathematical culture".Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics Education.Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 20–59.ISBN978-0-7923-1270-3.RetrievedApril 5,2020.
  108. ^Shasha, Dennis Elliot;Lazere, Cathy A. (1998).Out of Their Minds: The Lives and Discoveries of 15 Great Computer Scientists.Springer. p. 228.ISBN978-0-387-98269-4.
  109. ^Nickles, Thomas (2013). "The Problem of Demarcation".Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 104.ISBN978-0-226-05182-6.
  110. ^Pigliucci, Massimo(2014)."Are There 'Other' Ways of Knowing?".Philosophy Now.Archivedfrom the original on May 13, 2020.RetrievedApril 6,2020.
  111. ^abFerreirós, J. (2007)."Ό Θεὸς Άριθμητίζει: The Rise of Pure Mathematics as Arithmetic with Gauss".InGoldstein, Catherine;Schappacher, Norbert; Schwermer, Joachim (eds.).The Shaping of Arithmetic after C.F. Gauss's Disquisitiones Arithmeticae.Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 235–268.ISBN978-3-540-34720-0.
  112. ^Kuhn, Thomas S.(1976). "Mathematical vs. Experimental Traditions in the Development of Physical Science".The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.7(1). The MIT Press: 1–31.doi:10.2307/202372.JSTOR202372.
  113. ^Asper, Markus (2009)."The two cultures of mathematics in ancient Greece".In Robson, Eleanor; Stedall, Jacqueline (eds.).The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics.Oxford Handbooks in Mathematics. OUP Oxford. pp. 107–132.ISBN978-0-19-921312-2.RetrievedNovember 18,2022.
  114. ^Gozwami, Pinkimani; Singh, Madan Mohan (2019). "Integer Factorization Problem". In Ahmad, Khaleel; Doja, M. N.; Udzir, Nur Izura; Singh, Manu Pratap (eds.).Emerging Security Algorithms and Techniques.CRC Press. pp. 59–60.ISBN978-0-8153-6145-9.LCCN2019010556.OCLC1082226900.
  115. ^Maddy, P.(2008)."How applied mathematics became pure"(PDF).The Review of Symbolic Logic.1(1): 16–41.doi:10.1017/S1755020308080027.S2CID18122406.Archived(PDF)from the original on August 12, 2017.RetrievedNovember 19,2022.
  116. ^Silver, Daniel S. (2017)."In Defense of Pure Mathematics".In Pitici, Mircea (ed.).The Best Writing on Mathematics, 2016.Princeton University Press. pp. 17–26.ISBN978-0-691-17529-4.RetrievedNovember 19,2022.
  117. ^Parshall, Karen Hunger(2022)."The American Mathematical Society and Applied Mathematics from the 1920s to the 1950s: A Revisionist Account".Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.59(3): 405–427.doi:10.1090/bull/1754.S2CID249561106.Archivedfrom the original on November 20, 2022.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  118. ^Stolz, Michael (2002)."The History Of Applied Mathematics And The History Of Society".Synthese.133:43–57.doi:10.1023/A:1020823608217.S2CID34271623.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  119. ^Lin, C. C. (March 1976)."On the role of applied mathematics".Advances in Mathematics.19(3): 267–288.doi:10.1016/0001-8708(76)90024-4.
  120. ^Peressini, Anthony (September 1999).Applying Pure Mathematics(PDF).Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers. Vol. 66. pp. S1–S13.JSTOR188757.Archived(PDF)from the original on January 2, 2024.RetrievedNovember 30,2022.
  121. ^Lützen, J. (2011)."Examples and reflections on the interplay between mathematics and physics in the 19th and 20th century".In Schlote, K. H.; Schneider, M. (eds.).Mathematics meets physics: A contribution to their interaction in the 19th and the first half of the 20th century.Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Harri Deutsch.Archivedfrom the original on March 23, 2023.RetrievedNovember 19,2022.
  122. ^Marker, Dave (July 1996)."Model theory and exponentiation".Notices of the American Mathematical Society.43(7): 753–759.Archivedfrom the original on March 13, 2014.RetrievedNovember 19,2022.
  123. ^Chen, Changbo; Maza, Marc Moreno (August 2014).Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition in the RegularChains Library.International Congress on Mathematical Software 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8592. Berlin: Springer.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44199-2_65.RetrievedNovember 19,2022.
  124. ^Pérez-Escobar, José Antonio; Sarikaya, Deniz (2021)."Purifying applied mathematics and applying pure mathematics: how a late Wittgensteinian perspective sheds light onto the dichotomy".European Journal for Philosophy of Science.12(1): 1–22.doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00435-9.S2CID245465895.
  125. ^Takase, M. (2014)."Pure Mathematics and Applied Mathematics are Inseparably Intertwined: Observation of the Early Analysis of the Infinity".A Mathematical Approach to Research Problems of Science and Technology.Mathematics for Industry. Vol. 5. Tokyo: Springer. pp. 393–399.doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55060-0_29.ISBN978-4-431-55059-4.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  126. ^Sarukkai, Sundar (February 10, 2005). "Revisiting the 'unreasonable effectiveness' of mathematics".Current Science.88(3): 415–423.JSTOR24110208.
  127. ^Wagstaff, Samuel S. Jr. (2021)."History of Integer Factoring"(PDF).In Bos, Joppe W.; Stam, Martijn (eds.).Computational Cryptography, Algorithmic Aspects of Cryptography, A Tribute to AKL.London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series 469. Cambridge University Press. pp. 41–77.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 20, 2022.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  128. ^"Curves: Ellipse".MacTutor.School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland.Archivedfrom the original on October 14, 2022.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  129. ^Mukunth, Vasudevan (September 10, 2015)."Beyond the Surface of Einstein's Relativity Lay a Chimerical Geometry".The Wire.Archivedfrom the original on November 20, 2022.RetrievedNovember 20,2022.
  130. ^Wilson, Edwin B.; Lewis, Gilbert N. (November 1912). "The Space-Time Manifold of Relativity. The Non-Euclidean Geometry of Mechanics and Electromagnetics".Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.48(11): 389–507.doi:10.2307/20022840.JSTOR20022840.
  131. ^abcBorel, Armand(1983)."Mathematics: Art and Science".The Mathematical Intelligencer.5(4). Springer: 9–17.doi:10.4171/news/103/8.ISSN1027-488X.
  132. ^Hanson, Norwood Russell(November 1961). "Discovering the Positron (I)".The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.12(47). The University of Chicago Press: 194–214.doi:10.1093/bjps/xiii.49.54.JSTOR685207.
  133. ^Ginammi, Michele (February 2016). "Avoiding reification: Heuristic effectiveness of mathematics and the prediction of the Ωparticle ".Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.53:20–27.Bibcode:2016SHPMP..53...20G.doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2015.12.001.
  134. ^Wagh, Sanjay Moreshwar; Deshpande, Dilip Abasaheb (September 27, 2012).Essentials of Physics.PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 3.ISBN978-81-203-4642-0.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  135. ^Atiyah, Michael(1990).On the Work of Edward Witten(PDF).Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. p. 31. Archived fromthe original(PDF)on September 28, 2013.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  136. ^"Course 18C Mathematics with Computer Science".math.mit.edu.RetrievedJune 1,2024.
  137. ^"Theoretical Computer Science".math.mit.edu.RetrievedJune 1,2024.
  138. ^"Real-Life Applications of Discrete Mathematics".GeeksforGeeks.April 8, 2024.RetrievedMay 19,2024.
  139. ^Hales, Thomas; Adams, Mark; Bauer, Gertrud; Dang, Tat Dat; Harrison, John; Hoang, Le Truong; Kaliszyk, Cezary; Magron, Victor; Mclaughlin, Sean; Nguyen, Tat Thang; Nguyen, Quang Truong; Nipkow, Tobias; Obua, Steven; Pleso, Joseph; Rute, Jason; Solovyev, Alexey; Ta, Thi Hoai An; Tran, Nam Trung; Trieu, Thi Diep; Urban, Josef; Vu, Ky; Zumkeller, Roland (2017)."A Formal Proof of the Kepler Conjecture".Forum of Mathematics, Pi.5:e2.doi:10.1017/fmp.2017.1.hdl:2066/176365.ISSN2050-5086.S2CID216912822.Archivedfrom the original on December 4, 2020.RetrievedFebruary 25,2023.
  140. ^abcMillstein, Roberta(September 8, 2016)."Probability in Biology: The Case of Fitness"(PDF).In Hájek, Alan; Hitchcock, Christopher (eds.).The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy.pp. 601–622.doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.27.Archived(PDF)from the original on March 7, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  141. ^See for example Anne Laurent, Roland Gamet, Jérôme Pantel,Tendances nouvelles en modélisation pour l'environnement, actes du congrès «Programme environnement, vie et sociétés»15–17 janvier 1996, CNRS
  142. ^Bouleau 1999,pp. 282–283.
  143. ^Bouleau 1999,p. 285.
  144. ^"1.4: The Lotka-Volterra Predator-Prey Model".Mathematics LibreTexts.January 5, 2022.Archivedfrom the original on December 29, 2022.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  145. ^Salsburg, David (August 17, 1992)."Commentary"(PDF).The Use of Statistical Methods in the Analysis of Clinical Studies.46:17.
  146. ^National Research Council(2003). "8".Beyond the Molecular Frontier: Challenges for Chemistry and Chemical Engineering.NAP.edu. pp. 71–73.doi:10.17226/10633.ISBN978-0-309-16839-7.PMID25032300.
  147. ^"Catastrophe Models (Property)".content.naic.org.RetrievedMay 19,2024.
  148. ^"MAM2001 Essay".ww2.amstat.org.RetrievedMay 19,2024.
  149. ^Hill, Mullica (September 7, 2022)."HOW MATH IS USED IN WEATHER FORECASTING".mathnasium.RetrievedMay 19,2024.
  150. ^"Using Mathematical Models to Investigate Planetary Habitability"(PDF).NASA.RetrievedMay 19,2024.
  151. ^Edling, Christofer R. (2002)."Mathematics in Sociology".Annual Review of Sociology.28(1): 197–220.doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140942.ISSN0360-0572.
  152. ^Batchelder, William H. (January 1, 2015)."Mathematical Psychology: History".In Wright, James D. (ed.).International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition).Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 808–815.ISBN978-0-08-097087-5.RetrievedSeptember 30,2023.
  153. ^abZak, Paul J. (2010).Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy.Princeton University Press. p. 158.ISBN978-1-4008-3736-6.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  154. ^Levin, Jonathan; Milgrom, Paul (September 2004).Introduction to Choice Theory(PDF).
  155. ^Kremer, Michael; Rao, Gautam; Schilbach, Frank (2019). "Chapter 5 Behavioral development economics".Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations(PDF).Vol. 2.
  156. ^"Mathematics".mdpi.
  157. ^"Kondratiev, Nikolai Dmitrievich | Encyclopedia".encyclopedia.Archivedfrom the original on July 1, 2016.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  158. ^"Mathématique de l'histoire-géometrie et cinématique. Lois de Brück. Chronologie géodésique de la Bible., by Charles LAGRANGE et al. | The Online Books Page".onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu.
  159. ^"Cliodynamics: a science for predicting the future".ZDNet.Archivedfrom the original on December 29, 2022.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  160. ^Sokal, Alan;Jean Bricmont(1998).Fashionable Nonsense.New York: Picador.ISBN978-0-312-19545-8.OCLC39605994.
  161. ^"Biden's Misleading Unemployment Statistic – FactCheck.org".
  162. ^"Modern Macroeconomic Models as Tools for Economic Policy | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis".minneapolisfed.org.
  163. ^Balaguer, Mark (2016)."Platonism in Metaphysics".In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy(Spring 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.Archivedfrom the original on January 30, 2022.RetrievedApril 2,2022.
  164. ^SeeWhite, L. (1947). "The locus of mathematical reality: An anthropological footnote".Philosophy of Science.14(4): 289–303.doi:10.1086/286957.S2CID119887253.189303;also inNewman, J. R. (1956).The World of Mathematics.Vol. 4. New York: Simon and Schuster. pp. 2348–2364.
  165. ^Dorato, Mauro (2005)."Why are laws mathematical?"(PDF).The Software of the Universe, An Introduction to the History and Philosophy of Laws of Nature.Ashgate. pp. 31–66.ISBN978-0-7546-3994-7.Archived(PDF)from the original on August 17, 2023.RetrievedDecember 5,2022.
  166. ^Mura, Roberta (December 1993). "Images of Mathematics Held by University Teachers of Mathematical Sciences".Educational Studies in Mathematics.25(4): 375–85.doi:10.1007/BF01273907.JSTOR3482762.S2CID122351146.
  167. ^Tobies, Renate;Neunzert, Helmut (2012).Iris Runge: A Life at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Science, and Industry.Springer. p. 9.ISBN978-3-0348-0229-1.RetrievedJune 20,2015.[I]t is first necessary to ask what is meant bymathematicsin general. Illustrious scholars have debated this matter until they were blue in the face, and yet no consensus has been reached about whether mathematics is a natural science, a branch of the humanities, or an art form.
  168. ^Ziegler, Günter M.;Loos, Andreas (November 2, 2017). Kaiser, G. (ed.)."What is Mathematics?" and why we should ask, where one should experience and learn that, and how to teach it.Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer. pp. 63–77.doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_5.ISBN978-3-319-62596-6.(Sections "What is Mathematics?" and "What is Mathematics, Really?" )
  169. ^Mura 1993,pp. 379, 381.
  170. ^Brown & Porter 1995,p. 326.
  171. ^Strauss, Danie (2011)."Defining mathematics".Acta Academica.43(4): 1–28.RetrievedNovember 25,2022.
  172. ^Franklin, James(2009).Philosophy of Mathematics.Elsevier. pp. 104–106.ISBN978-0-08-093058-9.RetrievedJune 20,2015.
  173. ^Cajori, Florian(1893).A History of Mathematics.American Mathematical Society (1991 reprint). pp. 285–286.ISBN978-0-8218-2102-2.RetrievedJune 20,2015.
  174. ^Devlin 2018,p.3.
  175. ^Saunders Maclane (1986).Mathematics, form and function.Springer.,page 409
  176. ^Brown, Ronald;Porter, Timothy (1995)."The Methodology of Mathematics".The Mathematical Gazette.79(485): 321–334.doi:10.2307/3618304.JSTOR3618304.S2CID178923299.Archivedfrom the original on March 23, 2023.RetrievedNovember 25,2022.
  177. ^Hamami, Yacin (June 2022)."Mathematical Rigor and Proof"(PDF).The Review of Symbolic Logic.15(2): 409–449.doi:10.1017/S1755020319000443.S2CID209980693.Archived(PDF)from the original on December 5, 2022.RetrievedNovember 21,2022.
  178. ^Peterson 1988,p. 4: "A few complain that the computer program can't be verified properly." (in reference to the Haken–Apple proof of theFour Color Theorem)
  179. ^Perminov, V. Ya. (1988). "On the Reliability of Mathematical Proofs".Philosophy of Mathematics.42(167 (4)). Revue Internationale de Philosophie: 500–508.
  180. ^Davis, Jon D.; McDuffie, Amy Roth; Drake, Corey; Seiwell, Amanda L. (2019). "Teachers' perceptions of the official curriculum: Problem solving and rigor".International Journal of Educational Research.93:91–100.doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.10.002.S2CID149753721.
  181. ^Endsley, Kezia (2021).Mathematicians and Statisticians: A Practical Career Guide.Practical Career Guides. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 1–3.ISBN978-1-5381-4517-3.RetrievedNovember 29,2022.
  182. ^Robson, Eleanor(2009)."Mathematics education in an Old Babylonian scribal school".In Robson, Eleanor;Stedall, Jacqueline(eds.).The Oxford Handbook of the History of Mathematics.OUP Oxford.ISBN978-0-19-921312-2.RetrievedNovember 24,2022.
  183. ^Bernard, Alain;Proust, Christine;Ross, Micah (2014). "Mathematics Education in Antiquity". In Karp, A.; Schubring, G. (eds.).Handbook on the History of Mathematics Education.New York: Springer. pp. 27–53.doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9155-2_3.ISBN978-1-4614-9154-5.
  184. ^Dudley, Underwood (April 2002). "The World's First Mathematics Textbook".Math Horizons.9(4). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 8–11.doi:10.1080/10724117.2002.11975154.JSTOR25678363.S2CID126067145.
  185. ^Subramarian, F.Indian pedagogy and problem solving in ancient Thamizhakam(PDF).History and Pedagogy of Mathematics conference, July 16–20, 2012.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 28, 2022.RetrievedNovember 29,2022.
  186. ^Siu, Man Keung (2004). "Official Curriculum in Mathematics in Ancient China: How did Candidates Study for the Examination?".How Chinese Learn Mathematics(PDF).Series on Mathematics Education. Vol. 1. pp. 157–185.doi:10.1142/9789812562241_0006.ISBN978-981-256-014-8.RetrievedNovember 26,2022.
  187. ^Jones, Phillip S. (1967). "The History of Mathematical Education".The American Mathematical Monthly.74(1). Taylor & Francis, Ltd.: 38–55.doi:10.2307/2314867.JSTOR2314867.
  188. ^Schubring, Gert; Furinghetti, Fulvia; Siu, Man Keung (August 2012)."Introduction: the history of mathematics teaching. Indicators for modernization processes in societies".ZDM Mathematics Education.44(4): 457–459.doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0445-7.S2CID145507519.
  189. ^von Davier, Matthias; Foy, Pierre; Martin, Michael O.; Mullis, Ina V.S. (2020). "Examining eTIMSS Country Differences Between eTIMSS Data and Bridge Data: A Look at Country-Level Mode of Administration Effects".TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science(PDF).TIMSS&PIRLSInternational Study Center,Lynch School of Education and Human DevelopmentandInternational Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.p. 13.1.ISBN978-1-889938-54-7.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 29, 2022.RetrievedNovember 29,2022.
  190. ^Rowan-Kenyon, Heather T.; Swan, Amy K.; Creager, Marie F. (March 2012)."Social Cognitive Factors, Support, and Engagement: Early Adolescents' Math Interests as Precursors to Choice of Career"(PDF).The Career Development Quarterly.60(1): 2–15.doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00001.x.Archived(PDF)from the original on November 22, 2023.RetrievedNovember 29,2022.
  191. ^Luttenberger, Silke; Wimmer, Sigrid; Paechter, Manuela (2018)."Spotlight on math anxiety".Psychology Research and Behavior Management.11:311–322.doi:10.2147/PRBM.S141421.PMC6087017.PMID30123014.
  192. ^Yaftian, Narges (June 2, 2015)."The Outlook of the Mathematicians' Creative Processes".Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.191:2519–2525.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.617.
  193. ^Nadjafikhah, Mehdi; Yaftian, Narges (October 10, 2013)."The Frontage of Creativity and Mathematical Creativity".Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.90:344–350.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.101.
  194. ^van der Poorten, A. (1979)."A proof that Euler missed... Apéry's Proof of the irrationality of ζ(3)"(PDF).The Mathematical Intelligencer.1(4): 195–203.doi:10.1007/BF03028234.S2CID121589323.Archived(PDF)from the original on September 6, 2015.RetrievedNovember 22,2022.
  195. ^Petkovi, Miodrag (September 2, 2009).Famous Puzzles of Great Mathematicians.American Mathematical Society. pp. xiii–xiv.ISBN978-0-8218-4814-2.RetrievedNovember 25,2022.
  196. ^Hardy, G. H.(1940).A Mathematician's Apology.Cambridge University Press.ISBN978-0-521-42706-7.RetrievedNovember 22,2022.See alsoA Mathematician's Apology.
  197. ^Alon, Noga; Goldston, Dan; Sárközy, András; Szabados, József; Tenenbaum, Gérald; Garcia, Stephan Ramon; Shoemaker, Amy L. (March 2015). Alladi, Krishnaswami; Krantz, Steven G. (eds.)."Reflections on Paul Erdős on His Birth Centenary, Part II".Notices of the American Mathematical Society.62(3): 226–247.doi:10.1090/noti1223.
  198. ^See, for exampleBertrand Russell's statement "Mathematics, rightly viewed, possesses not only truth, but supreme beauty..." in hisHistory of Western Philosophy.1919. p. 60.
  199. ^Cazden, Norman (October 1959). "Musical intervals and simple number ratios".Journal of Research in Music Education.7(2): 197–220.doi:10.1177/002242945900700205.JSTOR3344215.S2CID220636812.
  200. ^Budden, F. J. (October 1967). "Modern mathematics and music".The Mathematical Gazette.51(377). Cambridge University Press ({CUP}): 204–215.doi:10.2307/3613237.JSTOR3613237.S2CID126119711.
  201. ^Enquist, Magnus; Arak, Anthony (November 1994)."Symmetry, beauty and evolution".Nature (Journal).372(6502): 169–172.Bibcode:1994Natur.372..169E.doi:10.1038/372169a0.ISSN1476-4687.PMID7969448.S2CID4310147.Archivedfrom the original on December 28, 2022.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  202. ^Hestenes, David (1999)."Symmetry Groups"(PDF).
  203. ^Bender, Sara (September 2020). "The Rorschach Test". In Carducci, Bernardo J.; Nave, Christopher S.; Mio, Jeffrey S.; Riggio, Ronald E. (eds.).The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Measurement and Assessment.Wiley. pp. 367–376.doi:10.1002/9781119547167.ch131.ISBN978-1-119-05751-2.
  204. ^Weyl, Hermann(2015).Symmetry.Princeton Science Library. Vol. 47. Princeton University Press. p.4.ISBN978-1-4008-7434-7.
  205. ^"Lecture 8: Translation Symmetry | Physics III: Vibrations and Waves | Physics".MIT OpenCourseWare.
  206. ^Bradley, Larry (2010)."Fractals – Chaos & Fractals".stsci.edu.Archivedfrom the original on March 7, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  207. ^"Self-similarity".math.bu.edu.Archivedfrom the original on March 2, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  208. ^Kissane, Barry (July 2009).Popular mathematics.22nd Biennial Conference of The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. Fremantle, Western Australia: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. pp. 125–126.Archivedfrom the original on March 7, 2023.RetrievedDecember 29,2022.
  209. ^Steen, L. A. (2012).Mathematics Today Twelve Informal Essays.Springer Science & Business Media. p. 2.ISBN978-1-4613-9435-8.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  210. ^Pitici, Mircea (2017).The Best Writing on Mathematics 2016.Princeton University Press.ISBN978-1-4008-8560-2.RetrievedJanuary 3,2023.
  211. ^Monastyrsky 2001,p. 1: "The Fields Medal is now indisputably the best known and most influential award in mathematics."
  212. ^Riehm 2002,pp. 778–782.
  213. ^"Fields Medal | International Mathematical Union (IMU)".mathunion.org.Archivedfrom the original on December 26, 2018.RetrievedFebruary 21,2022.
  214. ^ab"Fields Medal".Maths History.Archivedfrom the original on March 22, 2019.RetrievedFebruary 21,2022.
  215. ^"Honours/Prizes Index".MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive.Archivedfrom the original on December 17, 2021.RetrievedFebruary 20,2023.
  216. ^"About the Abel Prize".The Abel Prize.Archivedfrom the original on April 14, 2022.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  217. ^"Abel Prize | mathematics award".Encyclopedia Britannica.Archivedfrom the original on January 26, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  218. ^"Chern Medal Award"(PDF).mathunion.org.June 1, 2009.Archived(PDF)from the original on June 17, 2009.RetrievedFebruary 21,2022.
  219. ^"Chern Medal Award".International Mathematical Union (IMU).Archivedfrom the original on August 25, 2010.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  220. ^"The Leroy P Steele Prize of the AMS".School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, Scotland.Archivedfrom the original on November 17, 2022.RetrievedNovember 17,2022.
  221. ^Chern, S. S.; Hirzebruch, F. (September 2000).Wolf Prize in Mathematics.doi:10.1142/4149.ISBN978-981-02-3945-9.Archivedfrom the original on February 21, 2022.RetrievedFebruary 21,2022.
  222. ^"The Wolf Prize".Wolf Foundation.Archivedfrom the original on January 12, 2020.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  223. ^ab"Hilbert's Problems: 23 and Math".Simons Foundation.May 6, 2020.Archivedfrom the original on January 23, 2022.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  224. ^Feferman, Solomon(1998)."Deciding the undecidable: Wrestling with Hilbert's problems"(PDF).In the Light of Logic.Logic and Computation in Philosophy series. Oxford University Press. pp. 3–27.ISBN978-0-19-508030-8.RetrievedNovember 29,2022.
  225. ^"The Millennium Prize Problems".Clay Mathematics Institute.Archivedfrom the original on July 3, 2015.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.
  226. ^"Millennium Problems".Clay Mathematics Institute.Archivedfrom the original on December 20, 2018.RetrievedJanuary 23,2022.

Sources

Further reading