Jump to content

Montevideo Convention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Montevideo Convention
Convention on the Rights and Duties of States
Ratifications and signatories of the treaty
Parties
Signatories
SignedDecember 26, 1933
LocationMontevideo,Uruguay
EffectiveDecember 26, 1934
Signatories20[1]
Parties17[1](as of November 2021)
DepositaryPan American Union
LanguagesEnglish,French,SpanishandPortuguese
Full text
Montevideo ConventionatWikisource

TheMontevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of Statesis a treaty signed atMontevideo,Uruguay,on December 26, 1933, during the SeventhInternational Conference of American States.At the conference,United StatesPresidentFranklin D. RooseveltandSecretary of StateCordell Hulldeclared theGood Neighbor Policy,which opposed U.S. armed intervention in inter-American affairs. The convention was signed by 19 states. The acceptance of three of the signatories was subject to minor reservations. Those states wereBrazil,Peruand theUnited States.[2][1]

The convention became operative on December 26, 1934. It was registered inLeague of NationsTreaty Serieson January 8, 1936.[3]

The conference is notable in U.S. history, since one of the U.S. representatives was Dr.Sophonisba Preston Breckinridge,the first U.S. female representative at an international conference.[4]

Background[edit]

In most cases, the only avenue open toself-determinationfor colonial or national ethnic minority populations was to achieve international legal personality as a nation-state.[5]The majority of delegations at theInternational Conference of American Statesrepresented independent states that had emerged from former colonies. In most cases, their own existence and independence had been disputed or opposed by one or more of the European colonial empires. They agreed among themselves to criteria that made it easier for other dependent states with limited sovereignty to gain international recognition.

Contents of the convention[edit]

The convention sets out the definition, rights and duties of statehood. Most well-known is Article 1, which sets out the four criteria for statehood that have been recognized by international organizations[which?]as an accurate statement ofcustomary international law:[citation needed]

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

Furthermore, the first sentence of Article 3 explicitly states that "The political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states." This is known as thedeclarative theory of statehood.It stands in conflict with the alternativeconstitutive theory of statehood,by which a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. It should not be confused with theEstrada doctrine."Independence" and "sovereignty" are not mentioned in article 1.[6]

An important part of the convention was a prohibition of using military force to gain sovereignty. According to Article 11 of the convention,[2]

The contracting states definitely establish the rule of their conduct the precise obligation not to recognize territorial acquisitions or advantages that have been obtained by force whether this consists in the employment of arms, in threatening diplomatic representations, or in any other effective coercive measure

Article 11 reflects the contemporaryStimson Doctrine,which influenced the principles of theCharter of the United Nations.

Parties[edit]

Parties to the Montevideo Convention
Parties
Signatories

The 17 states that have ratified this convention are limited to theAmericas.

State[1][7] Signed Deposited Method
Brazil Dec 26, 1933 Feb 23, 1937 Ratification
Chile Dec 26, 1933 Mar 28, 1935 Ratification
Colombia Dec 26, 1933 Jul 22, 1936 Ratification
Costa Rica[a] Sep 28, 1937 Accession
Cuba Dec 26, 1933 Apr 28, 1936 Ratification
Dominican Republic Dec 26, 1933 Dec 26, 1934 Ratification
Ecuador Dec 26, 1933 Oct 3, 1936 Ratification
El Salvador Dec 26, 1933 Jan 9, 1937 Ratification
Guatemala Dec 26, 1933 Jun 12, 1935 Ratification
Haiti Dec 26, 1933 Aug 13, 1941 Ratification
Honduras Dec 26, 1933 Dec 1, 1937 Ratification
Mexico Dec 26, 1933 Jan 27, 1936 Ratification
Nicaragua Dec 26, 1933 Jan 8, 1937 Ratification
Panama Dec 26, 1933 Nov 13, 1938 Ratification
Paraguay Dec 26, 1933 Sep 7, 2018 Ratification
United States Dec 26, 1933 Jul 13, 1934 Ratification
Venezuela Dec 26, 1933 Feb 13, 1940 Ratification
Notes
  1. ^The Organization of American States' database lists Costa Rica as signing the treaty, but the treaty does not include a signature by Costa Rica.[8]

A further three states signed the convention on 26 December 1933, but have not ratified it.[1][9]

The only state to attend the Seventh International Conference of American States, where the convention was agreed upon, which did not sign it wasBolivia.[9]Costa Rica, which did not attend the conference, later signed the convention.[8]

Customary international law[edit]

In so far as it restatescustomary international law,the Montevideo Convention codified existing legal norms and its principles, which do not apply merely to the signatories, but to all subjects of international law as a whole.[10][11][better source needed]

TheEuropean Union,in the principal statement of itsBadinter Committee,[12]follows[clarification needed]the Montevideo Convention in its definition of a state: by having a territory, a population, and a political authority. The committee also found that the existence of states was a question of fact, while the recognition by other states was purely declaratory and not a determinative factor of statehood.[13]

Switzerland,although not a member of the European Union, adheres to the same principle, stating that "neither a political unit needs to be recognized to become a state, nor does a state have the obligation to recognize another one. At the same time, neither recognition is enough to create a state, nor does its absence abolish it."[14]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcde"A-40: Convention on Rights and Duties of States".Organization of American States.Retrieved2013-07-23.
  2. ^abHersch Lauterpacht(2012).Recognition in International Law.Cambridge University Press. p. 419.ISBN9781107609433.
  3. ^"United States of America - Convention on Rights and Duties of States adopted by the Seventh International Conference of American States, Signed at Montevideo, December 26th, 1933 [1936] LNTSer 9; 165 LNTS 19".worldlii.org.pp. 20–43.
  4. ^From colony to superpower: U.S. foreign relations since 1776,by George C. Herring,Oxford University Press,2008, p. 499. Online atGoogle Books.Retrieved 2011-09-20.
  5. ^The Postcoloniality of International Law, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 46, Number 2, Summer 2005, Sundhya Pahuja, page 5Archived2009-02-05 at theWayback Machine
  6. ^see for exampleState Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness, Legal Lessons from the Decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa, Gerard Kreijen, Published by Martinus Nijhoff, 2004,ISBN90-04-13965-6,page 110
  7. ^"Convention on Rights and Duties of States adopted by the Seventh International Conference of American States".United Nations Treaty Series,Registration Number:3802.Retrieved2015-11-16.
  8. ^abEncyclopedia of the Inter-American System.Greenwood Publishing Group. 1997-01-01. p. 287.ISBN9780313286001.Retrieved2013-07-23.Delegations from twenty states participated - from the United States and all those in Latin America except Costa Rica (provision was made for Costa Rica to later sign the conventions and treaties presented in the conference).
  9. ^ab"Convention on the Rights and Duties of States".Yale.Retrieved2013-07-23.
  10. ^Harris, D.J. (ed) 2004 "Cases and Materials on International Law" 6th Ed. at p. 99. Sweet and Maxwell, London
  11. ^Castellino, Joshua (2000).International Law and Self-Determination: The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession With Formulations of Post-Colonial National Identity.Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.p. 77.ISBN9041114092.
  12. ^The Badinter Arbitration Committee(full title), named for its chair, ruled on the question of whether the Republics of Croatia, Macedonia, and Slovenia, who had formally requested recognition by the members of the European Union and by the EU itself, had met conditions specified by the Council of Ministers of the European Community on December 16, 1991."The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples".Archived fromthe originalon 2008-05-17.Retrieved2012-05-10.
  13. ^Opinion No 1., Badinter Arbitration Committee, states that "the state is commonly defined as a community which consists of a territory and a population subject to an organized political authority; that such a state is characterized by sovereignty" and that "the effects of recognition by other states are purely declaratory".
  14. ^Switzerland's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DFA, Directorate of International Law: "Recognition of States and Governments," 2005.

Further reading[edit]

  • Stuart, Graham. "The Results of the Good Neighbor Policy In Latin America'World Affairs102#3 (September, 1939), pp. 166–170online

External links[edit]