Jump to content

Nilo-Saharan languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nilo-Saharan
(disputed)
Geographic
distribution		Central Africa,north-central Africa andEast Africa
Native speakers
ca. 70 million for all branches listed below.[1]
Linguistic classificationProposed language family
Proto-languageProto-Nilo-Saharan
Subdivisions
ISO 639-2/5ssa
GlottologNone
Distribution of Nilo-Saharan languages (in yellow)

TheNilo-Saharan languagesare a proposed family of around 210African languages[1]spoken by somewhere around 70 million speakers,[1]mainly in the upper parts of theChariandNilerivers, including historicNubia,north of where the two tributaries of the Nile meet. The languages extend through 17 nations in the northern half of Africa: fromAlgeriatoBeninin the west; fromLibyato theDemocratic Republic of the Congoin the centre; and fromEgypttoTanzaniain the east.

As indicated by its hyphenated name, Nilo-Saharan is a family of the African interior, including the greater Nile Basin and the CentralSaharaDesert. Eight of its proposed constituent divisions (excludingKunama,Kuliak,andSonghay) are found in the modern countries ofSudanandSouth Sudan,through which the Nile River flows.

In his bookThe Languages of Africa(1963),Joseph Greenbergnamed the group and argued it was ageneticfamily. It contained all the languages that were not included in theNiger–Congo,AfroasiaticorKhoisanfamilies. Although some linguists have referred to the phylum as "Greenberg'swastebasket",into which he placed all the otherwise unaffiliated non-click languagesof Africa,[2][3]other specialists in the field have accepted it as a working hypothesis since Greenberg's classification.[4]Linguists accept that it is a challenging proposal to demonstrate but contend that it looks more promising the more work is done.[5][6][7]

Some of the constituent groups of Nilo-Saharan are estimated to predate theAfrican neolithic.For example, the unity ofEastern Sudanicis estimated to date to at least the 5th millennium BC.[8]Nilo-Saharan genetic unity would thus be much older still and date to the lateUpper Paleolithic.The earliest written language associated with the Nilo-Saharan family isOld Nubian,one of the oldest written African languages, attested in writing from the 8th to the 15th century AD.

This larger classification system is not accepted by all linguists, however.Glottolog(2013), for example, a publication of theMax Planck Institutein Germany, does not recognise the unity of the Nilo-Saharan family or even of the Eastern Sudanic branch;Georgiy Starostin(2016) likewise does not accept a relationship between the branches of Nilo-Saharan, though he leaves open the possibility that some of them may prove to be related to each other once the necessaryreconstructivework is done. According to Güldemann (2018), "the current state of research is not sufficient to prove the Nilo-Saharan hypothesis."[9]

Characteristics[edit]

The constituent families of Nilo-Saharan are quite diverse. One characteristic feature is a tripartitesingulative–collective–plurative number system,which Blench (2010) believes is a result of anoun-classifiersystem in theprotolanguage.The distribution of the families may reflect ancient watercourses in a green Sahara during theAfrican humid periodbefore the4.2-kiloyear event,when the desert was more habitable than it is today.[10]

Major languages[edit]

Within the Nilo-Saharan languages are a number of languages with at least a million speakers (most data from SIL'sEthnologue16 (2009)). In descending order:

Some other important Nilo-Saharan languages under 1 million speakers:

The total for all speakers of Nilo-Saharan languages according toEthnologue16 is 38–39 million people. However, the data spans a range from ca. 1980 to 2005, with a weighted median at ca. 1990. Given population growth rates, the figure in 2010 might be half again higher, or about 60 million.

History of the proposal[edit]

The Saharan family (which includesKanuri,Kanembu,theTebu languages,andZaghawa) was recognized byHeinrich Barthin 1853, the Nilotic languages byKarl Richard Lepsiusin 1880, the various constituent branches of Central Sudanic (but not the connection between them) byFriedrich Müllerin 1889, and the Maban family byMaurice Gaudefroy-Demombynesin 1907. The first inklings of a wider family came in 1912, whenDiedrich Westermannincluded three of the (still independent) Central Sudanic families within Nilotic in a proposal he calledNiloto-Sudanic;[12]this expanded Nilotic was in turn linked to Nubian, Kunama, and possibly Berta, essentially Greenberg's Macro-Sudanic (Chari–Nile) proposal of 1954.

In 1920 G. W. Murray fleshed out the Eastern Sudanic languages when he grouped Nilotic, Nubian,Nera,Gaam,and Kunama.Carlo Conti Rossinimade similar proposals in 1926, and in 1935 Westermann addedMurle.In 1940 A. N. Tucker published evidence linking five of the six branches of Central Sudanic alongside his more explicit proposal for East Sudanic. In 1950 Greenberg retained Eastern Sudanic and Central Sudanic as separate families, but accepted Westermann's conclusions of four decades earlier in 1954 when he linked them together asMacro-Sudanic(laterChari–Nile,from theChariandNileWatersheds).

Greenberg's later contribution came in 1963, when he tied Chari–Nile to Songhai, Saharan, Maban, Fur, and Koman-Gumuz and coined the current nameNilo-Saharanfor the resulting family.Lionel Bendernoted that Chari–Nile was an artifact of the order of European contact with members of the family and did not reflect an exclusive relationship between these languages, and the group has been abandoned, with its constituents becoming primary branches of Nilo-Saharan—or, equivalently, Chari–Nile and Nilo-Saharan have merged, with the nameNilo-Saharanretained. When it was realized that theKadu languageswere not Niger–Congo, they were commonly assumed to therefore be Nilo-Saharan, but this remains somewhat controversial.

Progress has been made since Greenberg established the plausibility of the family.KomanandGumuzremain poorly attested and are difficult to work with, while arguments continue over the inclusion of Songhai. Blench (2010) believes that the distribution of Nilo-Saharan reflects the waterways of thewet Sahara12,000 years ago, and that the protolanguage hadnoun classifiers,which today are reflected in a diverse range of prefixes, suffixes, and number marking.

Internal relationships[edit]

Dimmendaal (2008) notes that Greenberg (1963) based his conclusion on strong evidence and that the proposal as a whole has become more convincing in the decades since. Mikkola (1999) reviewed Greenberg's evidence and found it convincing.Roger Blenchnotes morphological similarities in all putative branches, which leads him to believe that the family is likely to be valid.

KomanandGumuzare poorly known and have been difficult to evaluate until recently.[vague]Songhay is markedly divergent, in part due to massive influence from theMande languages.[4]Also problematic are theKuliak languages,which are spoken by hunter-gatherers and appear to retain a non-Nilo-Saharan core; Blench believes they might have been similar toHadzaorDahaloand shifted incompletely to Nilo-Saharan.

Anbessa Tefera and Peter Unseth consider the poorly attestedShabo languageto be Nilo-Saharan, though unclassified within the family due to lack of data; Dimmendaal and Blench, based on a more complete description, consider it to be a language isolate on current evidence. Proposals have sometimes been made to addMande(usually included inNiger–Congo), largely due to its many noteworthy similarities with Songhay rather than with Nilo-Saharan as a whole, however this relationship is more likely due to a close relationship between Songhay and Mande many thousands of years ago in the early days of Nilo-Saharan, so the relationship is probably more one of ancient contact than a genetic link.[4]

The extinctMeroitic languageof ancientKushhas been accepted by linguists such as Rille, Dimmendaal, and Blench as Nilo-Saharan, though others argue for anAfroasiaticaffiliation. It is poorly attested.

There is little doubt that the constituent families of Nilo-Saharan—of which onlyEastern SudanicandCentral Sudanicshow much internal diversity—are valid groups. However, there have been several conflicting classifications in grouping them together. Each of the proposed higher-order groups has been rejected by other researchers: Greenberg's Chari–Nile by Bender and Blench, and Bender's Core Nilo-Saharan by Dimmendaal and Blench. What remains are eight (Dimmendaal) to twelve (Bender) constituent families of no consensus arrangement.

Greenberg 1963[edit]

The branches of the Nilo-Saharan languages.

Joseph Greenberg,inThe Languages of Africa,set up the family with the following branches. The Chari–Nile core are the connections that had been suggested by previous researchers.

Nilo‑Saharan

Gumuzwas not recognized as distinct from neighbouring Koman; it was separated out (forming "Komuz" ) by Bender (1989).

Bender 1989, 1991[edit]

Lionel Bendercame up with a classification which expanded upon and revised that of Greenberg. He considered Fur and Maban to constitute aFur–Mabanbranch, addedKaduto Nilo-Saharan, removed Kuliak from Eastern Sudanic, removed Gumuz from Koman (but left it as a sister node), and chose to positKunamaas an independent branch of the family. By 1991 he had added more detail to the tree, dividing Chari–Nile into nested clades, including a Core group in whichBertawas considered divergent, and coordinating Fur–Maban as a sister clade to Chari–Nile.[13][14]

Nilo-Saharan

Bender revised his model of Nilo-Saharan again in 1996, at which point he split Koman and Gumuz into completely separate branches of Core Nilo-Saharan.[15]

Ehret 1989[edit]

Christopher Ehretcame up with a novel classification of Nilo-Saharan as a preliminary part of his then-ongoing research into the macrofamily. His evidence for the classification was not fully published until much later (seeEhret 2001below), and so it did not attain the same level of acclaim as competing proposals, namely those of Bender and Blench.[14]

Bender 2000[edit]

By 2000 Bender had entirely abandoned the Chari–Nile and Komuz branches. He also added Kunama back to the "Satellite–Core" group and simplified the subdivisions therein. He retracted the inclusion ofShabo,stating that it could not yet be adequately classified but might prove to be Nilo-Saharan once sufficient research has been done. This tentative and somewhat conservative classification held as a sort of standard for the next decade.[16]

Nilo-Saharan

Ehret 2001[edit]

Ehret's updated classification was published in his bookA Historical–Comparative Reconstruction of Nilo-Saharan(2001).[17]This model is notable in that it consists of two primary branches: Gumuz–Koman, and aSudanicgroup containing the rest of the families (seeSudanic languages § Nilo-Saharanfor more detail). Also, unusually, Songhay is well-nested within a core group and coordinate with Maban in a "Western Sahelian" clade, and Kadu is not included in Nilo-Saharan. Note that "Koman" in this classification is equivalent toKomuz,i.e. a family with Gumuz and Koman as primary branches, and Ehret renames the traditional Koman group as "Western Koman".

Nilo-Saharan
Koman
Sudanic

Central Sudanic

Northern Sudanic

Kunama

Saharo-Sahelian

Saharan

Sahelian

Fur

Trans-Sahel
Western Sahelian

Eastern Sahelian(Eastern Sudanic) (includingBerta)

Blench 2006[edit]

See also:Niger–Congo languages § Niger–Congo and Nilo-Saharan

Niger-Saharan,a language macrofamily linking the Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan phyla, was proposed byBlench(2006).[18]It was not accepted by other linguists. Blench's (2006) internal classification of the Niger-Saharan macrophylum is as follows:

According to Blench (2006), typological features common to both Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan include:

  • Phonology: ATR vowel harmony and the labial-velars /kp/ and /gb/
  • Noun-class affixes: e.g.,ma- affix for mass nouns in Nilo-Saharan
  • Verbal extensions and plural verbs

Blench 2010[edit]

With a better understanding of Nilo-Saharan classifiers, and the affixes or number marking they have developed into in various branches, Blench believes that all of the families postulated as Nilo-Saharan belong together. He proposes the following tentative internal classification, with Songhai closest to Saharan, a relationship that had not previously been suggested:

Kunama

Berta

?Mimi of Decorse

Blench 2015[edit]

By 2015,[19]and again in 2017,[20]Blench had refined the subclassification of this model, linking Maban with Fur, Kadu with Eastern Sudanic, and Kuliak with the node that contained them, and added a tentative, extinct branch he names "Plateau" as to explain a possible Nilo-Saharan substrate in the MalianDogonandBangimelanguages, for the following structure:

Berta

Blench (2021) concludes that Maban may be close to Eastern Sudanic.

Starostin (2016)[edit]

Starostin's "Macro-Sudanic" in purple, surrounding language families shown as well.

Georgiy Starostin(2016),[21]usinglexicostatisticsbased on Swadesh lists, is more inclusive thanGlottolog,and in addition finds probable and possible links between the families that will require reconstruction of the proto-languages for confirmation. Starostin also does not consider Greenberg's Nilo-Saharan to be a valid, coherent clade.

In addition to the families listed inGlottolog(previous section), Starostin considers the following to be established:

A relationship ofNyimawith Nubian, Nara, and Tama (NNT) is considered "highly likely" and close enough that proper comparative work should be able to demonstrate the connection if it's valid, though it would fall outside NNT proper (seeEastern Sudanic languages).

Other units that are "highly likely" to eventually prove to be valid families are:

In summary, at this level of certainty, "Nilo-Saharan" constitutes ten distinct and separate language families: Eastern Sudanic, Central Sudanic – Kadu, Maba–Kunama, Komuz, Saharan, Songhai, Kuliak, Fur, Berta, and Shabo.

Possible further "deep" connections, which cannot be evaluated until the proper comparative work on the constituent branches has been completed, are:

  • Eastern Sudanic + Fur + Berta
  • Central Sudanic – Kadu + Maba–Kunama

There are faint suggestions that Eastern and Central Sudanic may be related (essentially the old Chari–Nile clade), though that possibility is "unexplorable under current conditions" and could be complicated if Niger–Congo were added to the comparison. Starostin finds no evidence that the Komuz, Kuliak, Saharan, Songhai, or Shabo languages are related to any of the other Nilo-Saharan languages.Mimi-DandMeroiticwere not considered, though Starostin had previously proposed that Mimi-D was also an isolate despite its slight similarity to Central Sudanic.

In a follow-up study published in 2017, Starostin reiterated his previous points as well as explicitly accepting a genetic relationship between Macro-East Sudanic and Macro-Central Sudanic. Starostin names this proposal "Macro-Sudanic". The classification is as follows.[22]

Starostin (2017) finds significant lexical similarities between Kadu and Central Sudanic, while some lexical similarities also shared by Central Sudanic with Fur-Amdang, Berta, and Eastern Sudanic to a lesser extent.

Dimmendaal 2016, 2019[edit]

Gerrit J. Dimmendaal[23][24]suggests the following subclassification of Nilo-Saharan:

Nilo‑Saharan

Dimmendaal et al. consider the evidence for the inclusion ofKaduandSonghaytoo weak to draw any conclusions at present, whereas there is some evidence thatKomanandGumuzbelong together and may be Nilo-Saharan.[25]

The large Northeastern division is based on several typological markers:

Blench 2023[edit]

By 2023,[26]Blench had slightly revised the model for a deep primary split between Koman–Gumuz and the rest. Kunama and Berta are "provisionally" placed as the next to branch off, because they only partially share the features that unite the rest of the family. However, it is not clear if this is because they actually diverged early, or if they might have lost those features at a later date. For example, Berta shares plausible lexical cognates with theEastern Jebel languages(East Sudanic) and its system of grammatical number "closely resembles" those of theEast Sudanic languages;Kunama could be divergent "due to long-term interaction withAfroasiatic languages."Saharan–Songhay (especially Songhay) have seen substantial erosion of key characteristics, but this appears to be a secondary development and not evidence of early branching." Core "Nilo-Saharan (" Central African "in Blench 2015) thus appears to be a typological rather than genetic grouping, though Maban is treated as a divergent branch of Eastern Sudanic; Kadu also seems to be quite close. The resulting structure is as follows:

Beyond the work of Colleen Ahland, Blench notes that the inclusion of Koman is buttressed by the work of Manuel Otero.[27]The argument for Songhay is mostly lexical, especially the pronouns. Blench gives Greenberg credit for both East and Central Sudanic. Saharan and Songhay have some "striking" similarities in their lexicon, which Blench argues is genetic, though the absence of reliable proto-Sarahan and proto-Songhay reconstructions makes evaluation difficult.

Glottolog4.0 (2019)[edit]

In summarizing the literature to date, Hammarström et al. inGlottologdo not accept that the following families are demonstrably related with current research:

External relations[edit]

Proposals for the external relationships of Nilo-Saharan typically center onNiger–Congo:Gregersen (1972) grouped the two together asKongo–Saharan.However, Blench (2011) proposed that the similarities between Niger–Congo and Nilo-Saharan (specifically Atlantic–Congo and Central Sudanic) are due to contact, with the noun-class system of Niger–Congo developed from, or elaborated on the model of, the noun classifiers of Central Sudanic.

Phonology[edit]

Nilo-Saharan languages present great differences, being a highly diversified group. It has proven difficult to reconstruct many aspects of Proto-Nilo-Saharan. Two very different reconstructions of the proto-language have been proposed byLionel BenderandChristopher Ehret.

Bender's reconstruction[edit]

The consonant system reconstructed by Bender for Proto-Nilo-Saharan is:

Labial Coronal Palatal Velar
plosive voiceless *t,*t₂ *k,*kʰ
voiced *b *d,*d₂ *ɟ *g
fricative *f *s
liquid *r,*l *r₂
nasal *m *n *ŋ
semivowel *w *j

The phonemes/*d₂,*t₂/correspond to coronal plosives, the phonetic details are difficult to specify, but clearly, they remain distinct from/*d,*t/and supported by many phonetic correspondences (another author, C. Ehret, reconstructs for the coronal area the sound[d̪],[ḍ]and[t̪],[ṭ]which perhaps are closer to the phonetic detail of/*d₂,*t₂/,see infra)

Bender gave a list of about 350cognatesand discussed in depth the grouping and the phonological system proposed by Ch. Ehret. Blench (2000) compares both systems (Bender's and Ehret's) and prefers the former because it is more secure and is based in more reliable data.[28]For example, Bender points out that there is a set of phonemes includingimplosives/*ɓ,*ɗ,*ʄ,*ɠ/,ejectives/*pʼ,*tʼ,(*sʼ),*cʼ,*kʼ/and prenasal constants/*ᵐb,*ⁿd,(*ⁿt),*ⁿɟ,*ᵑg/,but it seems that they can be reconstructed only for core groups (E, I, J, L) and the collateral group (C, D, F, G, H), but not for Proto-Nilo-Saharan.

Ehret's reconstruction[edit]

Christopher Ehretused a less clear methodology and proposed a maximalist phonemic system:

Labial Dental Alveol. Retrof. Palatal Velar Glottal
plosive implosive *ɓ *ɗ *ɗ̣ *ɠ
voiced *b *d̪ *d *ḍ *g
voiceless *p *t̪ *t *ṭ *k
aspirate *pʰ *t̪ʰ *tʰ *ṭʰ *kʰ
ejective *pʼ *t̪ʼ *tʼ *ṭʼ *kʼ
fricative *θ *s,*z *ṣ
nasal simple *m *n *ɲ *ŋ
prenasal *ⁿb *ⁿð *ⁿd *ⁿḍ *ⁿg
liquid *l̪ *r,*l
approximant plain *w *j
complex *ʼw *ʼj *h

Ehret's maximalist system has been criticized byBenderandBlench.These authors state that the correspondences used by Ehret are not very clear and because of this many of the sounds in the table may only be allophonic variations.[29]

Morphology[edit]

Dimmendaal (2016)[23]cites the following morphological elements as stable across Nilo-Saharan:

Comparative vocabulary[edit]

Sample basic vocabulary in different Nilo-Saharan branches:

Note:In table cells with slashes, the singular form is given before the slash, while the plural form follows the slash.

Language eye ear nose tooth tongue mouth blood bone tree water eat name
Proto-Nilotic[30] *(k)ɔŋ, pl. *(k)ɔɲ *yit̪ *(q)ume *kɛ-la(-c) *ŋa-lyɛp *(k)ʊt̪ʊk *käw *kɛ-ɛt, *kɪ-yat *pi(-ʀ) *ɲam *ka-ʀin
Proto-Jebel[31] **ed ~ *er **si(di ~ gi) **ɲi-di **kala-d **udu **k-afa-d **(g-)am- **kaca **cii ~ *kii **ɲam (siigə, saag)
Temein[32] nɪ́ŋɪ̀nàʈ / kɛ̀ɛ́n wénàʈ / kwèén kɪ́mɪ́nʈɪ̀n / kɪkɪ́mɪ́nʈɪ́nɪ̀ awɪ̀s / kɛ́ɛ̀ʔ mɛ́nɖɪnyàʈ íʈùk / k(w)úʈɪ̀n mónɪ̀ʈ àmɪ̀s / kɔ́maʔ mɛ́rɛŋɪ̀s / mɛ́rɛŋ múŋ láma kàlɪ́n, kàlɪ́ŋ
Proto-Daju[33] *aŋune / *aŋwe ~ *aŋun *wunute / *wunuge *mu-ne *ɲiɣte / *ɲiɣke *ɲabire / *ɲabirta *ikke / *ikku *tamuke *ŋai / *ŋayu *ewete / *ewe *ma- *si- *ange / *angu
Kadugli(Talla dialect)[34] ayyɛ / iyyɛ naasɔ / isinɛ́ ámb-/nigáŋg-árɔk t̪- / iŋŋini áŋdáɗuk / ni- niinɔ / niginíínɔ ariid̪ʊ t̪iŋguba / kuba ffa / nááfa ɓiid̪i oori ɛɛrɛ / nigirɛɛnɛ
Proto-Northern Eastern Sudanic[35] *maɲ *ɲog-ul *em-u *ŋes-il *ŋal *ag-il ~ *ag-ul *ug-er *kɛs-ɛr *koɲ-er- *mban *kal- / *kamb- *(ŋ)ɛr-i
Nara[35] no, nòò / no-ta, nóó-ta tús / túsá demmo, dəmmo, dàm̀mò, dòmmò nɪ̀hɪ̀ / nɪ̀hɪ̀t-tá; nèʃɪ̀ / nèʃá hàggà, àggà, ààdà, hàdà aùlò / aùl-lá; àgúrá / àgúr-tà kitto, kɪ̀tò ketti, kəti, kátɪ́ / ketta, kátá tüm, tûm; kè́l emba, mbàà kal, kál, kár ade, ààdà
Proto-Nubian[35] *maaɲ, sg. *miɲ-di *ugul(-e), sg. *ugul-di ? *ŋil, sg. *ŋíl-di *ŋal, sg. ŋal-di *agil *ùg-er *kiser, sg. *kisir-ti *koor, sg. *koor-ti *es-ti *kal- *er-i
Proto-Taman[35] *me-ti, pl. *mVŋ *(ŋ)usu-ti (sg) *eme, sg. emi-ti (sg.) *ŋesi-t(i), pl. *ŋes-oŋ *laat *auli *agi *kei-ti, pl. *kei-ŋ *gaan; *kiɲe(-ti) (?) *kal /*kaal *ŋan- *(ŋ)aat, pl. *(ŋ)ari-g
Proto-Nyima[35] *a̍ŋV *ɲɔgɔr- *(o)mud̪- (?) *ŋil- ? *ŋàl- *wule *amV *t̪uma *bɔ́ŋ *t̪a̍l- / *ta̍m-
Proto-SW Surmic[36] *kɛɓɛrɛ (pl.) *it̪t̪at *ʊŋɛtʃ (?) *ɲiggɪtta *ʌgʌʌt *(k)-ʊt̪t̪ʊk *ɓɪj- *ɛmmɛ *kɛɛt̪ *maam *ɗak- *ðara
Proto-SE Surmic[36] *kabari *ɲabi (?) *giroŋ *ɲigidda (?) *kat *tuk- *ɲaɓa *giga (?) *kɛdo (?) *ma *sara
Proto-Kuliak[37] *ekw, pl. *ekw=ẹk *beos, pl. *beosẹk *nyab, pl. *nyabẹk *ɛd-eɓ *ak, pl. *akẹk *seh *ɔk *ad, pl. *ad=is *kywɛh *yed, pl. *yedẹk
Shabo[38] sɛ k’iti sonɑ k’ɑu hɑndɑ kɑusɛ dɑmo emɑhɑ; egege k’ɔnɑ wɔː woŋgɑse
Ongota[39] ˈʔaːfa ˈwoːwa ˈsiːna (loan?) ʔitiˈma ʔɑdabo (loan?) ˈʔiːfa ˈmitʃa (loan?) ˈhɑntʃa ˈtʃaːhawa ʔeˈdʒak ˈmiʃa
Proto-Sara-Bongo-Bagirmi[40] *kamɔ; *kamu; *kama *imbi; *EmbE; *mbili; *mbElE; *imbil-; *EmbEl- *Samɔ; *Samu; *Somu; *kanu; *kunu; *kVnV *kanga; *nganga *unɖɛ(C-) *tara *manga; *masu; *mVsV; *nɖuma *Kinga; *Kunga; *Kingo *kaga *mEnE; *mAnɛ; *mani *OɲO; *ɔɲɔ; *VɲV *iɭi; *ʈV
Proto-Mangbetu[41] *mʷɔ̀ *bɪ́ *amɔ̀ *kɪ́ *kàɖrà *tí(kpɔ̀) *álí *kpɔ̀ *kɪ́rɪ́ɛ̀ *gʷò *láɲɔ̀ *kɛ̀lʊ̀
Mangbutu[42] owékékí ubí tongi usɛ́ kedrú utí koto ikpi okpá uwɛ ano aɓé
Bale[42] ɲɔ̌ bí ndǔ̱tú̱ kú da tso zú kpa tsú cû wyɔ ngbá / nzú
Ndru[42] nikpɔ́ ɓi(na) ondǐ̹tsǔ̹ ku da tsu âzû kpá ítsú ǐɗá ɲú óvôná
Ma'di(Uganda)[43] mī bí ɔ̀mvɔ̄ sí lɛ̀ɖá ti àrɪ́ hʷa kʷɛ èyí ɲā rú
Birri[44] mɛ́; mʊ́ nvö; nvu ímɔ̀; ámɔ̀ sì ìnɖrɔ́; ìnɖrá tyi(di) ɔ́tɔ́ kpɔ kpi; kpɪ wu ɔnyo iri
Kresh[45] mumu mbímbi uŋú ʃɛ́ʃɛ̀ ndjindja – srama kpɔkpɔ́ kpikpi ùyù ɔ́ʃɔ́ díri
Dongo[45] mómu mbimbi ʔɔŋu cẹ̀cẹ̀ ndjándja – ọọs kpọkpŏ kpikpi ùyù l-ọc(ic) díri
Aja[45] iɲi mimbi múmú uku ndindyi – usa gbäbí cící ɓaɓa aɲ kiri
Kunama[46] wà ùkùˈnà bòbòˈnà mà ŋèeˈlà ùˈdà kòkòˈbà sàŋˈgà èˈlà bìˈà ˈìŋ(à) ˈkíidà
Berta[47] aře iile amúŋ ndu-fuudí hala n'du k’aβa k’aara s’ís’ía fɪ'ri θɪ́ŋa huu (= foot)
Gumuz,Northern[48] kʼwácá tsʼéa ííta kʼósa kʼótʼá sa maχá ʒákwá ɟá aja sá tsʼéa
Proto-Koman[27] *D̪E *cʼɛ *ʃʊnʃ *ʃE *lEtʼ̪a *tʼ̪wa *sʼámá; *bàs *ʃUImakʼ *cwálá *jiɗE *ʃa; *kʼama *D̪uga
Gule[49] yan ĭgŭn fufŭn ŏdāīān wāīdjo wŏt āī
Gule[50] yan igă̄n fufan adad ayan ĭten ai
Amdang(Kouchane)[51] ni dili, kiliŋgɛ gʊrnɑ kɑlkɑ dɔlː sɪˈmi tʃoː dʊrtu sɔŋ sunu zɑm tʃuluk
Proto-Maba[52] *kàSì-k *dúrmì *sati-k; *sàdí-k / *sadi-ɲi *delemi-k *fàrí-ŋ *ta-k / *ta-si *-aɲɔ- *mílí-ik
Maba[53] kàʃì-k/-ñi koi-k boiñ sati-k delmi-k kan-a/-tu àríi kàñjí-k soŋgo-k inji añ mílí-i/-síi
Mimi of Decorse[54] dyo feɾ fir ɲain ɲyo su engi ɲyam
Kanuri[55] shîm sə́mò kə́nzà tímì; shélì tə́làm cî bû shíllà kə̀ská njî bù cû
Zaghawa[56][57] í kέbέ síná màrgiː tàmsiː áá ógú úrú bɛ̀gìdiː bí sε:gì tír
Dendi[58] mò háŋŋá nínè hínydyè dɛ́llɛ̀ méè kpííʀì bíʀí túúʀì hàʀí ŋwáà máà
Tadaksahak[59] mó haŋgá t-í-nʒar ée-ʃan íilǝs míya kud-én biidí tugúdu aryén ŋá mân

Population history[edit]

In theSahelandEast AfricaNilo-Saharanspeakers are associated with the ruling class of powerful empires and sultanates that have dominated the region such as theGao Empire,being thelargest contiguousSonghai Empirethat dominated the Sahel,West Africa,theSahara/MaghrebandCentral Africa,theKanem-Bornu Empirein Central Africa, theSultanate of Damagaram,theWadai Empire,theSultanate of Baguirmi,theSultanate of Darfur,theSultanate of Sennar,theZabarma Emirate,and theShilluk Kingdom.[citation needed]

ThepastoralistTutsiand theRutara peopleof the great lakes are also ofNiloticancestry and have led the powerfulkingdom of Rwanda,theKingdom of Burundi,theKingdom of Bunyoro,the Kitara Empire, theKingdom of Toro,theKingdom of Buganda,theKingdom of Karagwe,and theKingdom of Rwenzururu.Whilst these are established on the Bantu peoples from which they adopted the language, they have preserved the bovine pastoralism of the Nilotic peoples.[60][61][62][63]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abc"Nilo-Saharan; Ethnologue".Archivedfrom the original on 2023-03-09.Retrieved2023-08-06.
  2. ^Campbell, Lyle; Mixco, Mauricio J. (2007).A Glossary of Historical Linguistics.University of Utah Press.ISBN978-0-87480-892-6.
  3. ^Matthews, P. H. (2007).Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics(2nd ed.). Oxford.ISBN978-0-19-920272-0.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link),
  4. ^abcBlench, Roger & Lameen Souag. m.s.Saharan and Songhay form a branch of Nilo-SaharanArchived2016-03-27 at theWayback Machine.
  5. ^Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (1992)."Nilo-Saharan Languages".International Encyclopedia of Linguistics.Vol. 3. Oxford. pp.100–104.ISBN0-19-505196-3.{{cite book}}:CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. ^Bender, M. Lionel (2000). "Nilo-Saharan".African Languages, An Introduction.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 43–73.ISBN0-521-66178-1.
  7. ^Blench, Roger; Ahland, Colleen (2010).The Classification of Gumuz and Koman Languages.Language Isolates in Africaworkshop, Lyons, December 4. Archived fromthe originalon March 16, 2012.RetrievedSeptember 5,2011.
  8. ^Clark, John Desmond (1984).From Hunters to Farmers: The Causes and Consequences of Food Production in Africa.University of California Press. p. 31.ISBN0-520-04574-2.
  9. ^Güldemann, Tom (2018). "Historical linguistics and genealogical language classification in Africa". In Güldemann, Tom (ed.).The Languages and Linguistics of Africa.The World of Linguistics series. Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 299–308.doi:10.1515/9783110421668-002.ISBN978-3-11-042606-9.S2CID133888593.
  10. ^Drake, N. A.; Blench, R. M.; Armitage, S. J.; Bristow, C. S.; White, K. H. (2011)."Ancient watercourses and biogeography of the Sahara explain the peopling of the desert".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.108(2): 458–62.Bibcode:2011PNAS..108..458D.doi:10.1073/pnas.1012231108.PMC3021035.PMID21187416.
  11. ^Lewis, M. Paul, ed. (2009)."Maasai: A language of Kenya".Ethnologue: Languages of the World(Sixteenth ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Archivedfrom the original on 2008-10-23.Retrieved2008-02-29..
  12. ^Diedrich Westermann, 1912.The Shilluk people, their language and folklore
  13. ^Bender, M. Lionel(1991) "Subclassification of Nilo-Saharan". In Bender, M. Lionel, ed. (1991)Proceedings of the Fourth Nilo-Saharan Conference,Bayreuth, Aug. 30–Sep. 2, 1989. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag. NISA 7, 1–36
  14. ^abRoger Blench(2006).The Niger-Saharan Macrophylum(PDF).Cambridge: Mallam Dendo. p. 5.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2021-01-24.Retrieved2018-11-30.
  15. ^Bender, Lionel(1996).The Nilo-Saharan languages: a comparative essay.Munich: Lincom Europa.
  16. ^Bender, Lionel(2000). "Nilo-Saharan". In Heine, Bernd; Nurse, Derek (eds.).African Languages: An Introduction.Cambridge University Press.ISBN0-521-66178-1.
  17. ^Ehret (2001)
  18. ^Blench, Roger. 2006.The Niger-Saharan MacrophylumArchived2013-11-26 at theWayback Machine.
  19. ^Blench, Roger. 2015.Was there a now-vanished branch of Nilo-Saharan on the Dogon Plateau? Evidence from substrate vocabulary in Bangime and DogonArchived2019-07-03 at theWayback Machine. Available in:http:// rogerblench.info/Language/Isolates/MT%20XX%20Blench%20off%20print.pdfArchived2020-07-03 at theWayback Machine
  20. ^Blench, Roger."Africa over the last 12,000 years".Archivedfrom the original on 2022-04-09.Retrieved2017-10-21.
  21. ^George Starostin (2016)The Nilo-Saharan hypothesis tested through lexicostatistics: current state of affairsArchived2023-04-05 at theWayback Machine
  22. ^Starostin, Georgiy C. 2017.Языки Африки. Опыт построения лексикостатистической классификации. Т. 3. Нило-сахарские языкиArchived2021-08-06 at theWayback Machine/ Languages of Africa: an attempt at a lexicostatistical classification. Volume 3: Nilo-Saharan languages. Moscow: Издательский Дом ЯСК / LRC Press. 840 p.ISBN978-5-9909114-9-9
  23. ^abDimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2016)."On stable and unstable features in Nilo-Saharan".The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-06-20.Retrieved2018-11-16.
  24. ^Gerrit Dimmendaal, Colleen Ahland, Angelika Jakobi & Constance Kutsch-Lojenga (2019) "Linguistic features and typologies in languages commonly referred to as 'Nilo-Saharan'", in Wolff, Ekkehard (ed.)Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics,p.326-381.
  25. ^Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. (2011).Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages.John Benjamins. p. 313.ISBN978-90-272-8722-9.
  26. ^Blench, Roger. 2023.In defence of Nilo-Saharan.
  27. ^abOtero, Manuel Alejandro. 2019.A Historical Reconstruction of the Koman Language Family.Doctoral thesis. Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon.
  28. ^Blench, Roger M.(2000)"The classification of Nilo-Saharan"(Afrika und Übersee 83). p. 299.[dead link]
  29. ^Blench, Roger (2004). "Review of The Civilizations of Africa: A History to 1800".The African Archaeological Review.21(4): 239–242.doi:10.1007/s10437-004-0752-7.ISSN0263-0338.JSTOR25130809.S2CID162354153.
  30. ^Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. 1988. "The lexical reconstruction of proto-Nilotic: a first reconnaissance."Afrikanistische(AAP) 16: 5–67.
  31. ^Bender, M. Lionel. 1998. "The Eastern Jebel Languages of Sudan."Afrika und Übersee81: 39–64.
  32. ^Blench, Roger.Temein languages comparative wordlistArchived2021-01-25 at theWayback Machine.
  33. ^Thelwall, Robin. 1981.The Daju Language Group.Doctoral dissertation. Coleraine: New University of Ulster.
  34. ^Schadeberg, Thilo.1994. Comparative Kadu Wordlists.Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere40:11–48. University of Cologne.
  35. ^abcdeRilly, Claude. 2010. Le méroïtique et sa famille linguistique. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.
  36. ^abYigezu, Moges. 2001.A comparative study of the phonetics and phonology of Surmic languages.Bruxelles: Université libre de Bruxelles. Doctoral dissertation, University of Bruxelles.
  37. ^Heine, Bernd. 1976. TheKuliak Languages of Eastern Uganda.Nairobi: East African Publishing House.
  38. ^Jordan, Linda, Hussein Mohammed, and Jillian Netzley. 2015. Sociolinguistic Survey of the Shabo of Ethiopia. SIL Electronic Survey Report 2015-019. SIL International.
  39. ^Wedekind, Klaus. 2001.Sociolinguistic Survey Report of the Languages of the Gawwada, Tsamay, and Diraasha Areas with Excursions to Birayle (Ongota) and Arbore (Irbore): Part 2Archived2012-07-28 at theWayback Machine.SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2002-066: 6–15.
  40. ^Boyeldieu, Pascal, Pierre Nougayrol, and Pierre Palayer. 2006.Lexique comparatif historique des langues Sara-Bongo-BaguirmiennesArchived2021-01-24 at theWayback Machine.Online version.
  41. ^Demolin, Didier. 1992.Le Mangbetu: etude phonétique et phonologique,2 vols. Brussels: Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres, Université libre de Bruxelles dissertation.
  42. ^abcBokula, Moiso & Agozia-Kario Irumu. 1994. Bibliographie et matériaux lexicaux des langues Moru-Mangbetu (Soudan-Central, Zaïre).Annales Aequatoria10: 203‒245.
  43. ^Boone, Douglas; Richard L. Watson (editors). 1996.Moru-Ma'di survey reportArchived2022-03-05 at theWayback Machine.Nairobi, Kenya: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
  44. ^Santandrea, Stefano. 1966. The Birri language: Brief elementary notes.Afrika und Übersee49: 81‒234.
  45. ^abcSantandrea, Stefano. 1976.The Kresh group, Aja and Baka languages (Sudan): A linguistic contribution.Napoli: Istituto Universitario Orientale.
  46. ^Bender, Lionel. 2001. English-Kunama lexicon.Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere65: 201–253.
  47. ^Bender, M. Lionel. 1989. Berta Lexicon. In Bender, M. Lionel (ed.),Topics in Nilo-Saharan Linguistics,271–304. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
  48. ^Ahland, Colleen and Eliza Kelly. 2014.Daatsʼíin-Gumuz Comparative Word listArchived2019-03-29 at theWayback Machine.
  49. ^Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1932. Ethnological Observations in Dar Fung.Sudan Notes and Records15: 1–61.
  50. ^Seligmann, Brenda Z. 1911–1912. Note on Two Languages in the Sennar Province of Anglo-Egyptian Sudan.Zeitschrift für Kolonialsprachen2: 297–308.
  51. ^Wolf, Katharina. 2010.Une enquête sociolinguistique parmi les Amdang (Mimi) du Tchad: Rapport TechniqueArchived2020-07-20 at theWayback Machine.SIL Electronic Survey Reports 2010-028
  52. ^Blench, Roger. 2021.The Maban languages and their place within Nilo-SaharanArchived2021-01-15 at theWayback Machine.
  53. ^Edgar, John T. 1991.Maba-group Lexicon.(Sprache und Oralität in Afrika: Frankfurter Studien zur Afrikanistik, 13.) Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.
  54. ^Gaudefroy-Demombynes, Maurice. 1907. Document sur les Langues de l'Oubangui-Chari. InActes du XVIe Congrès International des Orientalistes, Alger, 1905,Part II, 172–330. Paris: Ernest Leroux.
  55. ^Doris Löhr, H. Ekkehard Wolff (with Ari Awagana). 2009.Kanuri vocabularyArchived2020-08-04 at theWayback Machine.In: Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri (eds.)World Loanword Database.Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 1591 entries.
  56. ^Blažek, Václav. 2007.On application of Glottochronology for Saharan LanguagesArchived2020-03-28 at theWayback Machine.InViva Africa2007. Proceedings of the IInd International Conference on African Studies (April 2007). Plzeň: Dryáda, 2007. p. 19-38, 19 pp.ISBN978-80-87025-17-8.
  57. ^Tourneux, Henry. 1992. Inventaire phonologiques et formation du pluriel en zaghawa (Tchad).Afrika und Übersee75, 267–277.
  58. ^Zima, Petr. 1994.Lexique dendi (songhay):Djougou,Bénin: avec un index français-dendi.(Westafrikanische Studien 4). Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.
  59. ^Christiansen-Bolli, Regula. 2010.A Grammar of Tadaksahak: a Northern Songhay Language of Mali.Leiden.
  60. ^Stephens, Rhiannon (2 September 2013).A History of African Motherhood: The Case of Uganda, 700–1900.Cambridge University Press.ISBN9781107030800.Archivedfrom the original on 2 January 2023.Retrieved2 January2023.
  61. ^Elfasi, M.; Hrbek, Ivan (January 1988).Africa from the Seventh to the Eleventh Century.UNESCO.ISBN9789231017094.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-01-02.Retrieved2023-01-02.
  62. ^Wrigley, Christopher (16 May 2002).Kingship and State: The Buganda Dynasty.Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780521894357.Archivedfrom the original on 2 January 2023.Retrieved2 January2023.
  63. ^Schoenbrun, David L. (1993)."Cattle herds and banana gardens: The historical geography of the western Great Lakes region,ca AD 800?1500".The African Archaeological Review.11–11: 39–72.doi:10.1007/BF01118142.S2CID161913402.Archivedfrom the original on 2023-01-02.Retrieved2023-01-02.

Further reading[edit]

External relationships[edit]

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nilo-Saharan_languages&oldid=1229279127"