Jump to content

No Platform

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromNo platform)
This article is about a British student organisation policy. For general usage in social media, seeDeplatforming.

No Platform,in the UK, is a form of studentboycottwhere a person or organisation is denied a platform to speak. The BritishNational Union of Students(NUS) established its No Platform policy in April 1974.[1]Like other No Platform policies, it asserts that no proscribed person or organisation should be given a platform to speak, nor should a union officer share a platform with them. The policy traditionally applies to entities that the NUS considers racist or fascist, most notably theBritish National Party,[2]although the NUS and its liberation campaigns have policies refusing platforms to other people or organisations. The policy does not extend to students' unions who are part of NUS, although similar policies have also been adopted by its constituent unions.[citation needed]

Policy content

[edit]

The No Platform policy, as defined in the NUS's articles of association, provides that no "individuals or members of organisations or groups identified by the Democratic Procedures Committee as holding racist or fascist views" may stand for election to any NUS position, or attend or speak at any NUS function or conference. Furthermore, officers, committee members, or trustees may not share a platform with any racist or fascist.[3]The list of proscribed organisations, as of April 2015, includes the following organisations:[4]

The NUS also has policy refusing platforms to people or organisations for other reasons: the NUS LGBT Campaign (and formerly, also the Women's Campaign) refuses platforms to those they consider to betransphobic,includingJulie Bindel;[5]and the National Executive Committee has a policy refusing a platform to those it considers to be rape deniers or rape apologists, followingGeorge Galloway's statements about rape when asked about the allegations of sexual assault facingJulian Assange.[6]

Controversies

[edit]

The policy attracts criticism from people who consider it to becensorship.

Following the adoption in December 1985 of a No Platform policy by theOxford University Student Union,theOxford University Conservative Associationorganised a petition of almost 700 signatures, more than the minimum requirement, to put the policy to a referendum of the student union's members. In late February 1986, the No Platform policy was overturned by a vote of 3,152 against with 2,246 in favour.[7]

Students' unions inDurham,Leicester,NewcastleandSalfordhave all had attempts[when?]to overturn No Platform policies.[8]In 2013, theLondon School of Economics Students' UnionGeneral Meeting voted, 431–172, to reject No Platform.[9][better source needed]

In 2007, debate surfaced[vague]in theUniversity of Oxfordabout the policy whenBritish National PartyleaderNick Griffinwas scheduled to appear on the university's student radio station,Oxide Radio.At that time, the station did not have editorial independence from its parent company, Oxford Student Services Limited, the commercial subsidiary of theOxford University Student Union.OUSU backed the NUS decision,[clarification needed]but in 2007 theOxford Union(the debating society, which is self-governing, not affiliated to either OUSU or the NUS, and indeed independent of theUniversity of Oxford,in spite of most of its members being from that institution), invited Nick Griffin along with British writer andHolocaust denierDavid Irvingto speak. Members of the Student Union picketed the debate and some protesters broke into the Union chambers before being ejected by security.[10]Subsequently, Oxide Radio was granted editorial independence from OUSU.[citation needed]In a similar way, theCambridge Unionopposes the principle of No Platform in both its actions[11]and laws,[12]despite its support by theCambridge University Students' Union.[13]In the past, this policy has resulted in student protests against the hosting of speakers such as Universities MinisterDavid Willetts,government ministerEric Pickles[14](during which the building was broken into),Marine Le Pen[11]andJulian Assange.[15]

In February 2010, two NUS officers forced the cancellation of a proposed debate onmulticulturalismwhich was scheduled to includeBritish National PartyMEPAndrew Bronsat theUniversity of Durham.These actions caused controversy within the Durham student body.[16]The debate, organised byDurham Union Society,was to have featured two prominentBritish National Partymembers:Andrew BronsMEPandLeeds City CouncillorChris Beverley.[17]Upon hearing of BNP involvement in the debate, then-NUS Black Students' Officer (and future MP)Bellavia Ribeiro-Addy,andNUS LGBTOfficer Daf Adley, jointly sent a letter to both Durham Union Society and the university demanding its cancellation. The pair incorrectly stated that the debate would be illegal and threatened to organise a "colossal demonstration" in tandem withUnite Against Fascism,adding that "if any students are hurt in and around this event responsibility will lie with you".[18][irrelevant citation]The subsequent cancellation of the debate by Durham Union Society President Anna Birley on safety grounds was met with fierce backlash. NUS PresidentWes Streetingwas prompted to personally appear before Durham Union Society to apologise for the actions of the officers concerned, while some Durham students protested outside the debating chamber.[19]A protest group onFacebookquickly amassed over 2,500 members. An official petition was soon lodged withDurham Students Unionto call for a referendum on disaffiliation from NUS.[20]On 12 March 2010, the referendum concluded with a majority of voting students having voted to disaffiliate.[21]In January 2011, they decided to reaffiliate.[22]

Legislative response

[edit]

Section 43 of theEducation (No. 2) Act 1986,enacted in response to the rise of No Platform policies in the mid-1980s,[23]imposes a duty on universities to ensure that groups and individuals are not denied the use of facilities on account of their beliefs or views.[24]In February 2021, the ConservativeEducation Secretary,Gavin Williamson,announced that the government would bring forward a law to extend this duty to students' unions.[25]TheHigher Education (Freedom of Speech) Billwas announced in the2021 Queen's Speechand given itsFirst ReadingbeforeParliamentaccordingly on 12 May 2021. The bill would allow speakers at universities to seek compensation for no-platforming, impose fines on universities and students' unions with No Platform policies, and establish a newombudsmancharged with monitoring cases of no-platforming and academic dismissals.[26]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Smith, Evan (2020).No Platform: A History of Anti-Fascism, Universities and the Limits of Free Speech.Abingdon: Routledge. p. 86.ISBN9780429847813.
  2. ^"Stop the BNP".National Union of Students.Archivedfrom the original on 2013-10-07.Retrieved2015-10-10.
  3. ^"site @ NUS connect"(PDF).Archived from the original on 2016-01-05.Retrieved2017-02-25.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  4. ^"NUS National Executive Council AGENDA"(PDF).Archived from the original on 2014-09-30.Retrieved2017-02-25.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  5. ^"Microsoft Word - LGBT_2007-11.doc"(PDF).Archived from the original on 2013-12-28.Retrieved2017-02-25.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  6. ^Dina Rickman"George Galloway Banned By The NUS For Julian Assange 'Rape' Comments",The Huffington Post,27 September 2012
  7. ^Smith 2020,p. 151.
  8. ^"Welfare Zone Policy 2010-2012"(PDF).National Union of Students.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2013-12-12.Retrieved2015-10-10.
  9. ^"And the results are in | LSE Students' Union Tumblr".Lsesu.tumblr. December 2013.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  10. ^Taylor, Matthew (2007-11-27)."Irving and Griffin spark fury at Oxford Union debate".The Guardian.London.Retrieved2010-05-20.
  11. ^ab"Marine Le Pen sparks Cambridge protests".Telegraph.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  12. ^"The Constitution".The Cambridge Union Society.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  13. ^Wells, Oriel (2012-11-14)."CUSU seeks to block Assange (Secretly)".The Tab Cambridge.Archived fromthe originalon 2014-09-03.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  14. ^"Outrage over student protest at Cambridge Union – Union security staff" Out of control "".The Cambridge Student.24 May 2011.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  15. ^"Protest planned over Julian Assange appearance".Cambridge News. 2012-11-15. Archived fromthe originalon 2015-09-28.Retrieved2015-09-27.
  16. ^"Security concerns stifle free speech".Palatinate.org.uk. Archived fromthe originalon 2010-02-18.Retrieved2010-05-31.
  17. ^"The British National Party — Blog — Labour Party thugs dictate what university students can listen to".Archived from the original on 2010-04-29.Retrieved2017-02-25.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  18. ^"Multiculturalism Debate & Potential Anti-Fascist Protests - Van Mildert JCR".Dur.ac.uk. 2010-02-02. Archived fromthe originalon 2011-03-09.Retrieved2010-05-31.
  19. ^"Student union apologises over BNP claim (From the Northern Echo)".Thenorthernecho.co.uk. 2010-02-10.Retrieved2010-05-31.
  20. ^"NUS mis-handling prompts backlash".Palatinate.org.uk. 2010-02-08. Archived fromthe originalon 2010-04-18.Retrieved2010-05-31.
  21. ^Results for Should DSU be affiliated to the National Union of Students? in NUS Affiliation
  22. ^Johnson, Daniel (28 January 2011)."60% vote to reaffiliate with NUS".Palatinate Online.Retrieved30 April2017.
  23. ^Smith 2020,p. 135.
  24. ^Suterwalla, Azeem (2021-02-17)."Free speech in Universities".Monckton Chambers.Retrieved2021-05-14.
  25. ^Hazell, Will (2021-02-16)."Government to fine student unions for 'no platforming', as Gavin Williamson announces 'free speech champion'".i.Retrieved2021-05-13.
  26. ^"Universities could face fines over free speech breaches".BBC News.2021-05-12.Retrieved2021-05-13.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_Platform&oldid=1229434345"