Jump to content

CP/M

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromOS/M)

CP/M
A screenshot of CP/M-86
DeveloperDigital Research, Inc.,Gary Kildall
Written inPL/M,Assembly language
Working stateHistorical
Source modelOriginallyclosed source,nowopen source[1]
Initial release1974;50 years ago(1974)
Latest release3.1 / 1983;41 years ago(1983)[2]
Available inEnglish
Update methodRe-installation
Package managerNone
PlatformsIntel 8080,Intel 8085,Zilog Z80,Zilog Z8000,Intel 8086,Motorola 68000
KerneltypeMonolithic kernel
Influenced byRT-11,OS/8
Default
user interface
Command-line interface(CCP.COM)
LicenseOriginallyproprietary,nowBSD-like
Succeeded byMP/M,CP/M-86
Official websiteDigital Research CP/M page

CP/M,[3]originally standing forControl Program/Monitor[4]and laterControl Program for Microcomputers,[5][6][7]is a mass-marketoperating systemcreated in 1974 forIntel 8080/85-basedmicrocomputersbyGary KildallofDigital Research, Inc.CP/M is adisk operating system[8]and its purpose is to organize files on a magnetic storage medium, and to load and run programs stored on a disk. Initially confined to single-tasking on8-bit processorsand no more than 64kilobytesof memory, later versions of CP/M added multi-user variations and were migrated to16-bit processors.

The combination of CP/M andS-100 buscomputers became an early standard in the microcomputer industry. Thiscomputer platformwas widely used in business through the late 1970s and into the mid-1980s.[9]CP/M increased the market size for both hardware and software by greatly reducing the amount of programming required to port an application to a new manufacturer's computer.[10][11]An important driver of software innovation was the advent of (comparatively) low-cost microcomputers running CP/M, as independent programmers andhackersbought them and shared their creations inuser groups.[12]CP/M was eventually displaced byDOSfollowing the 1981 introduction of theIBM PC.

History

[edit]
CP/M advertisement in the 29 November 1982 issue ofInfoWorldmagazine

Early history

[edit]

Gary Kildalloriginally developed CP/M during 1974,[5][6]as an operating system to run on an IntelIntellec-8development system, equipped with aShugart Associates8-inchfloppy-disk driveinterfaced via a customfloppy-disk controller.[13]It was written in Kildall's ownPL/M(Programming Languagefor Microcomputers).[14]Various aspects of CP/M were influenced by theTOPS-10operating system of theDECsystem-10mainframe computer,which Kildall had used as a development environment.[15][16][17]An early outside licensee of CP/M wasGnat Computers,an early microcomputer developer out ofSan Diego, California.In 1977, the company was granted the license to use CP/M 1.0 for any micro they desired for $90. Within the year, demand for CP/M was so high that Digital Research was able to increase the license to tens of thousands of dollars.[18]

Under Kildall's direction, the development of CP/M 2.0 was mostly carried out by John Pierce in 1978.Kathryn Strutynski,a friend of Kildall fromNaval Postgraduate School(NPS), became the fourth employee of Digital Research Inc. in early 1979. She started by debugging CP/M 2.0, and later became influential as key developer for CP/M 2.2 and CP/M Plus. Other early developers of the CP/M base included Robert "Bob" Silberstein and David "Dave" K. Brown.[19][20]

CP/M originally stood for "Control Program/Monitor",[3]a name which implies aresident monitor—a primitive precursor to the operating system. However, during the conversion of CP/M to a commercial product, trademark registration documents filed in November 1977 gave the product's name as "Control Program for Microcomputers".[6]The CP/M name follows a prevailing naming scheme of the time, as in Kildall's PL/M language, and Prime Computer'sPL/P(Programming Language for Prime), both suggesting IBM'sPL/I;and IBM'sCP/CMSoperating system, which Kildall had used when working at the NPS. This renaming of CP/M was part of a larger effort by Kildall and his wife with business partner, Dorothy McEwen[4]to convert Kildall's personal project of CP/M and the Intel-contracted PL/M compiler into a commercial enterprise. The Kildalls intended to establish the Digital Research brand and its product lines as synonymous with "microcomputer" in the consumer's mind, similar to what IBM and Microsoft together later successfully accomplished in making "personal computer" synonymous with their product offerings. Intergalactic Digital Research, Inc. was later renamed via a corporation change-of-name filing to Digital Research, Inc.[4]

Initial success

[edit]
AppleCP/M Cardwith manual

By September 1981, Digital Research had sold more than260,000CP/M licenses;InfoWorldstated that the actual market was likely larger because of sublicenses. Many different companies produced CP/M-based computers for many different markets; the magazine stated that "CP/M is well on its way to establishing itself asthesmall-computer operating system ".[21] The companies chose to support CP/M because of its large library of software. TheXerox 820ran the operating system because "where there are literally thousands of programs written for it, it would be unwise not to take advantage of it", Xerox said.[22](Xerox included aHoward W. SamsCP/M manual as compensation for Digital Research's documentation, whichInfoWorldin 1982 described as atrocious.[23]) By 1984,Columbia Universityused the same source code to buildKermitbinaries for more than a dozen different CP/M systems, plus a generic version.[24]The operating system was described as a "software bus",[25][26]allowing multiple programs to interact with different hardware in a standardized way.[27]Programs written for CP/M were typically portable among different machines, usually requiring only the specification of theescape sequencesfor control of thescreenand printer. This portability made CP/M popular, and much more software was written for CP/M than for operating systems that ran on only one brand of hardware. One restriction on portability was that certain programs used the extended instruction set of the Z80 processor and would not operate on an 8080 or 8085 processor. Another was graphics routines, especially in games and graphics programs, which were generally machine-specific as they used direct hardware access for speed, bypassing the OS and BIOS (this was also a common problem in early DOS machines).[citation needed]

Bill Gatesclaimed that theApple IIwith aZ-80 SoftCardwas the single most-popular CP/M hardware platform.[28]Many different brands of machines ran the operating system, some notable examples being theAltair 8800,theIMSAI 8080,theOsborne 1and Kayproluggables,andMSXcomputers. The best-selling CP/M-capable system of all time was probably theAmstrad PCW.In the UK, CP/M was also available onResearch Machineseducational computers (with the CP/M source code published as an educational resource), and for theBBC Microwhen equipped with a Z80 co-processor. Furthermore, it was available for theAmstrad CPCseries, theCommodore 128,TRS-80,and later models of theZX Spectrum.CP/M 3 was also used on the NIAT, a custom handheld computer designed forA. C. Nielsen's internal use with 1MBofSSDmemory.

Multi-user

[edit]

In 1979, a multi-user compatible derivative of CP/M was released.MP/Mallowed multiple users to connect to a single computer, using multiple terminals to provide each user with a screen and keyboard. Later versions ran on 16-bit processors.

CP/M Plus

[edit]
CP/M Plus (CP/M 3) System Guide

The last 8-bit version of CP/M was version 3, often called CP/M Plus, released in 1983.[19]Its BDOS was designed by Brown.[19]It incorporated the bank switching memory management of MP/M in a single-user single-task operating system compatible with CP/M 2.2 applications. CP/M 3 could therefore use more than 64 KB of memory on an 8080 or Z80 processor. The system could be configured to support date stamping of files.[19]The operating system distribution software also included a relocating assembler and linker.[2]CP/M 3 was available for the last generation of 8-bit computers, notably the Amstrad PCW, theAmstrad CPC,theZX Spectrum +3,theCommodore 128,MSXmachines and the Radio ShackTRS-80 Model 4.[29]

16-bit versions

[edit]
DEC PRO-CP/M-80 floppy-disk distribution for the Z80-A co-processor in a DEC Professional 3xx series

There were versions of CP/M for some16-bitCPUs as well.

The first version in the 16-bit family wasCP/M-86for theIntel 8086in November 1981.[30]Kathryn Strutynski was the project manager for the evolving CP/M-86 line of operating systems.[19][20]At this point, the original8-bitCP/M became known by theretronymCP/M-80to avoid confusion.[30]

CP/M-86 was expected to be the standard operating system of the newIBM PCs,but DRI andIBMwere unable to negotiate development and licensing terms. IBM turned to Microsoft instead, and Microsoft deliveredPC DOSbased on86-DOS.Although CP/M-86 became an option for the IBM PC after DRI threatened legal action, it never overtook Microsoft's system. Most customers were repelled by the significantly greater price IBM charged for CP/M-86 over PC DOS (US$240 and US$40, respectively).[31]

WhenDigital Equipment Corporation(DEC) put out theRainbow 100to compete with IBM, it came with CP/M-80 using a Z80 chip, CP/M-86 or MS-DOS using an 8088 microprocessor, orCP/M-86/80using both. The Z80 and 8088 CPUs ran concurrently.[32][33]A benefit of the Rainbow was that it could continue to run 8-bit CP/M software, preserving a user's possibly sizable investment as they moved into the 16-bit world of MS-DOS.[32]A similardual-processoradaption for theCompuPro System 816[sr]was namedCP/M 8-16.The CP/M-86 adaptation for the 8085/8088-basedZenith Z-100also supported running programs for both of its CPUs.

Soon following CP/M-86, another 16-bit version of CP/M wasCP/M-68Kfor theMotorola 68000.The original version of CP/M-68K in 1982 was written inPascal/MT+68k,but it was ported to C later on. CP/M-68K, already running on the MotorolaEXORmacssystems, was initially to be used in theAtari STcomputer, but Atari decided to go with a newer disk operating system calledGEMDOS.CP/M-68K was also used on the SORD M68 and M68MX computers.[34]

In 1982, there was also a port from CP/M-68K to the 16-bitZilog Z8000for theOlivetti M20,written inC,namedCP/M-8000.[35][36]

These 16-bit versions of CP/M required application programs to be re-compiled for the new CPUs. Some programs written in assembly language could beautomatically translatedfor a new processor. One tool for this was Digital Research'sXLT86,which translated.ASM source code for the Intel 8080 processor into.A86 source code for the Intel 8086. The translator would also optimize the output for code size and take care of calling conventions, so thatCP/M-80andMP/M-80programs could be ported to the CP/M-86 andMP/M-86platforms automatically. XLT86 itself was written inPL/I-80and was available for CP/M-80 platforms as well as forVAX/VMS.[37]

Displacement by MS-DOS

[edit]

Many expected that CP/M would be the standard operating system for 16-bit computers.[38]In 1980 IBM approached Digital Research, atBill Gates' suggestion,[39]to license a forthcoming version of CP/M for its new product, the IBM Personal Computer. Upon the failure to obtain a signednon-disclosure agreement,the talks failed, and IBM instead contracted with Microsoft to provide an operating system.[40]The resulting product,MS-DOS,soon began outselling CP/M.

Many of the basic concepts and mechanisms of early versions of MS-DOS resembled those of CP/M. Internals like file-handling data structures were identical, and both referred to disk drives with a letter (A:,B:,etc.). MS-DOS's main innovation was itsFATfile system. This similarity made it easier to port popular CP/M software likeWordStaranddBase.However, CP/M's concept of separate user areas for files on the same disk was never ported to MS-DOS. Since MS-DOS had access to more memory (as few IBM PCs were sold with less than 64 KB of memory, while CP/M could run in 16 KB if necessary), more commands were built into thecommand-line shell,making MS-DOS somewhat faster and easier to use on floppy-based computers.

Although one of the first peripherals for the IBM PC was a SoftCard-like expansion card that let it run 8-bit CP/M software,[41]InfoWorldstated in 1984 that efforts to introduce CP/M to the home market had been largely unsuccessful and most CP/M software was too expensive for home users.[42]In 1986 the magazine stated that Kaypro had stopped production of 8-bit CP/M-based models to concentrate on sales of MS-DOS compatible systems, long after most other vendors had ceased production of new equipment and software for CP/M.[43]CP/M rapidly lost market share as the microcomputing market moved to the IBM-compatible platform, and it never regained its former popularity.Bytemagazine, at the time one of the leading industry magazines for microcomputers, essentially ceased covering CP/M products within a few years of the introduction of the IBM PC. For example, in 1983 there were still a few advertisements for S-100 boards and articles on CP/M software, but by 1987 these were no longer found in the magazine.

Later versions of CP/M-86 made significant strides in performance and usability and were made compatible with MS-DOS. To reflect this compatibility the name was changed, and CP/M-86 becameDOS Plus,which in turn becameDR-DOS.

ZCPR

[edit]

ZCPR[44](the Z80 Command Processor Replacement) was introduced on 2 February 1982 as a drop-in replacement for the standard Digital Research console command processor (CCP) and was initially written by a group of computer hobbyists who called themselves "The CCP Group". They were Frank Wancho, Keith Petersen (the archivist behindSimtelat the time), Ron Fowler, Charlie Strom, Bob Mathias, and Richard Conn. Richard was, in fact, the driving force in this group (all of whom maintained contact through email).

ZCPR1 was released on a disk put out by SIG/M (Special Interest Group/Microcomputers), a part of the Amateur Computer Club ofNew Jersey.

ZCPR2 was released on 14 February 1983. It was released as a set of ten disks from SIG/M. ZCPR2 was upgraded to 2.3, and also was released in 8080 code, permitting the use of ZCPR2 on 8080 and 8085 systems.

ZCPR3[45]was released on 14 July 1984, as a set of nine disks from SIG/M. The code for ZCPR3 could also be compiled (with reduced features) for the 8080 and would run on systems that did not have the requisiteZ80microprocessor. Features of ZCPR as of version 3 included shells, aliases, I/O redirection, flow control, named directories, search paths, custom menus, passwords, and online help. In January 1987, Richard Conn stopped developing ZCPR, and Echelon asked Jay Sage (who already had a privately enhanced ZCPR 3.1) to continue work on it. Thus, ZCPR 3.3 was developed and released. ZCPR 3.3 no longer supported the 8080 series of microprocessors, and added the most features of any upgrade in the ZCPR line. ZCPR 3.3 also included a full complement of utilities with considerably extended capabilities. While enthusiastically supported by the CP/M user base of the time, ZCPR alone was insufficient to slow the demise of CP/M.

Hardware model

[edit]
Sanco 8001 computer, running under CP/M 2.2 (1982)
CP/M cartridge for theCommodore 64

A minimal 8-bit CP/M system would contain the following components:

  • Acomputer terminalusing theASCIIcharacter set
  • An Intel 8080 (and later the 8085) or Zilog Z80 microprocessor
    • TheNEC V20andV30processors support an 8080-emulation mode that can run 8-bit CP/M on a PC-DOS/MS-DOS computer so equipped, though anyPC clonecould run CP/M-86.[46][47]
  • At least 16 kilobytes ofRAM,beginning at address 0
  • A means tobootstrapthe first sector of the diskette
  • At least onefloppy-diskdrive

The only hardware system that CP/M, as sold by Digital Research, would support was the Intel 8080 Development System. Manufacturers of CP/M-compatible systems customized portions of the operating system for their own combination of installed memory, disk drives, and console devices. CP/M would also run on systems based on the Zilog Z80 processor since the Z80 was compatible with 8080 code. While the Digital Research distributed core of CP/M (BDOS, CCP, core transient commands) did not use any of the Z80-specific instructions, many Z80-based systems used Z80 code in the system-specific BIOS, and many applications were dedicated to Z80-based CP/M machines.

Digital Research subsequently partnered with Zilog and American Microsystems to produce Personal CP/M, a ROM-based version of the operating system aimed at lower-cost systems that could potentially be equipped without disk drives.[48]First featured in the Sharp MZ-800, a cassette-based system with optional disk drives,[49]Personal CP/M was described as having been "rewritten to take advantage of the enhanced Z-80 instruction set" as opposed to preserving portability with the 8080. American Microsystems announced a Z80-compatible microprocessor, the S83, featuring 8 KB of in-package ROM for the operating system and BIOS, together with comprehensive logic for interfacing with 64-kilobit dynamic RAM devices.[50]Unit pricing of the S83 was quoted as $32 in 1,000 unit quantities.[51]

On most machines the bootstrap was a minimalbootloaderinROMcombined with some means of minimalbank switchingor a means of injecting code on the bus (since the 8080 needs to see boot code at Address 0 for start-up, while CP/M needs RAM there); for others, this bootstrap had to be entered into memory usingfront-panelcontrols each time the system was started.

CP/M used the 7-bit ASCII set. The other 128 characters made possible by the 8-bit byte were not standardized. For example, oneKayproused them for Greek characters, andOsbornemachines used the 8th bit set to indicate an underlined character.WordStarused the 8th bit as an end-of-word marker. International CP/M systems most commonly used theISO 646norm for localized character sets, replacing certain ASCII characters with localized characters rather than adding them beyond the 7-bit boundary.

Components

[edit]

In the 8-bit versions, while running, the CP/M operating system loaded into memory had three components:[3]

  • Basic Input/Output System(BIOS),
  • Basic Disk Operating System(BDOS),
  • Console Command Processor(CCP).

The BIOS and BDOS were memory-resident, while the CCP was memory-resident unless overwritten by an application, in which case it was automatically reloaded after the application finished running. A number of transient commands for standard utilities were also provided. The transient commands resided infileswith theextension.COM on disk.

The BIOS directly controlled hardware components other than the CPU and main memory. It contained functions such as character input and output and the reading and writing of disk sectors. The BDOS implemented the CP/Mfile systemand some input/output abstractions (such as redirection) on top of the BIOS. The CCP took user commands and either executed them directly (internal commands such as DIR to show a directory or ERA to delete a file) or loaded and started an executable file of the given name (transient commands such as PIP.COM to copy files or STAT.COM to show various file and system information). Third-party applications for CP/M were also essentially transient commands.

The BDOS, CCP and standard transient commands were the same in all installations of a particular revision of CP/M, but the BIOS portion was always adapted to the particular hardware.

Adding memory to a computer, for example, meant that the CP/M system had to be reinstalled to allow transient programs to use the additional memory space. A utility program (MOVCPM) was provided with system distribution that allowed relocating the object code to different memory areas. The utility program adjusted the addresses in absolute jump and subroutine call instructions to new addresses required by the new location of the operating system in processor memory. This newly patched version could then be saved on a new disk, allowing application programs to access the additional memory made available by moving the system components. Once installed, the operating system (BIOS, BDOS and CCP) was stored in reserved areas at the beginning of any disk which would be used to boot the system. On start-up, the bootloader (usually contained in a ROM firmware chip) would load the operating system from the disk in driveA:.

By modern standards CP/M was primitive, owing to the extreme constraints on program size. With version 1.0 there was no provision for detecting a changed disk. If a user changed disks without manually rereading the disk directory the system would write on the new disk using the old disk's directory information, ruining the data stored on the disk. From version 1.1 or 1.2 onwards, changing a disk then trying to write to it before its directory was read would cause a fatal error to be signalled. This avoided overwriting the disk but required a reboot and loss of the data that was to be stored on disk.

The majority of the complexity in CP/M was isolated in the BDOS, and to a lesser extent, the CCP and transient commands. This meant that by porting the limited number of simple routines in the BIOS to a particular hardware platform, the entire OS would work. This significantly reduced the development time needed to support new machines, and was one of the main reasons for CP/M's widespread use. Today this sort of abstraction is common to most OSs (ahardware abstraction layer), but at the time of CP/M's birth, OSs were typically intended to run on only one machine platform, and multilayer designs were considered unnecessary.

Console Command Processor

[edit]
Screenshot showing a CP/M 3.0 directory listing using theDIRcommand on a Commodore 128 home computer

The Console Command Processor, or CCP, accepted input from the keyboard and conveyed results to the terminal. CP/M itself would work with either a printing terminal or a video terminal. All CP/M commands had to be typed in on thecommand line.The console would most often display theA>prompt, to indicate the current default disk drive. When used with a video terminal, this would usually be followed by a blinkingcursorsupplied by the terminal. The CCP would await input from the user. A CCP internal command, of the form drive letter followed by a colon, could be used to select the default drive. For example, typingB:and pressing enter at the command prompt would change the default drive to B, and the command prompt would then becomeB>to indicate this change.

CP/M's command-line interface was patterned after the operating systems fromDigital Equipment,such asRT-11for thePDP-11andOS/8for thePDP-8.[citation needed]Commands took the form of a keyword followed by a list of parameters separated by spaces or special characters. Similar to a Unixshell builtin,if an internal command was recognized, it was carried out by the CCP itself. Otherwise it would attempt to find an executable file on the currently logged disk drive and (in later versions) user area, load it, and pass it any additional parameters from the command line. These were referred to as "transient" programs. On completion, CP/M would reload the part of the CCP that had been overwritten by application programs — this allowed transient programs a larger memory space.

The commands themselves could sometimes be obscure. For instance, thecommandto duplicate files was namedPIP(Peripheral-Interchange-Program), the name of the old DEC utility used for that purpose. The format of parameters given to a program was not standardized, so that there was no single option character that differentiated options from file names. Different programs could and did use different characters.

The CP/M Console Command Processor includesDIR,ERA,REN,SAVE,TYPE,andUSERasbuilt-incommands.[52]Transient commands in CP/M includeASM,DDT,DUMP,ED,LOAD,MOVCPM[pl],PIP,STAT,SUBMIT,andSYSGEN.[52]

CP/M Plus (CP/M Version 3) includes DIR (display list of files from a directory except those marked with the SYS attribute),DIRSYS/DIRS(list files marked with the SYS attribute in the directory),ERASE/ ERA (delete a file),RENAME/ REN (rename a file), TYPE /TYP(display contents of an ASCII character file), and USER /USE(change user number) as built-in commands:[53]CP/M 3 allows the user to abbreviate the built-in commands.[54]Transient commands in CP/M 3 includeCOPYSYS,DATE,DEVICE,DUMP,ED,GET,HELP,HEXCOM,INITDIR,LINK,MAC,PIP,PUT,RMAC,SET,SETDEF,SHOW,SID,SUBMIT,andXREF.[54]

Basic Disk Operating System

[edit]

The Basic Disk Operating System,[14][13]or BDOS,[14][13]provided access to such operations as opening a file, output to the console, or printing. Application programs would load processor registers with a function code for the operation, and addresses for parameters or memory buffers, and call a fixed address in memory. Since the address was the same independent of the amount of memory in the system, application programs would run the same way for any type or configuration of hardware.

Basic Input Output System

[edit]
CP/M advertisement in the 11 December 1978 issue ofInfoWorldmagazine

The Basic Input Output System or BIOS,[14][13]provided the lowest level functions required by the operating system.

These included reading or writing single characters to the system console and reading or writing a sector of data from the disk. The BDOS handled some of the buffering of data from the diskette, but before CP/M 3.0 it assumed a disk sector size fixed at 128 bytes, as used onsingle-density8-inch floppy disks. Since most 5.25-inch disk formats used larger sectors, the blocking and deblocking and the management of a disk buffer area was handled by model-specific code in the BIOS.

Customization was required because hardware choices were not constrained by compatibility with any one popular standard. For example, some manufacturers used a separate computer terminal, while others designed a built-in integrated video display system. Serial ports for printers and modems could use different types ofUARTchips, and port addresses were not fixed. Some machines used memory-mapped I/O instead of the 8080 I/O address space. All of these variations in the hardware were concealed from other modules of the system by use of the BIOS, which used standard entry points for the services required to run CP/M such as character I/O or accessing a disk block. Since support for serial communication to a modem was very rudimentary in the BIOS or may have been absent altogether, it was common practice for CP/M programs that used modems to have a user-installed overlay containing all the code required to access a particular machine's serial port.

Applications

[edit]
Distribution5+14-inch diskettes and packaging for the last version (version 4) of WordStar word processing program released for 8-bit CP/M

WordStar, one of the first widely usedword processors,anddBase,an early and popular database program for microcomputers, were originally written for CP/M. Two earlyoutliners,KAMAS(Knowledge and Mind Amplification System) and its cut-down successor Out-Think (without programming facilities and retooled for 8080/V20 compatibility) were also written for CP/M, though later rewritten for MS-DOS.Turbo Pascal,the ancestor ofBorland Delphi,andMultiplan,the ancestor ofMicrosoft Excel,also debuted on CP/M before MS-DOS versions became available.VisiCalc,the first-ever spreadsheet program, was made available for CP/M. Another company,Sorcim,created itsSuperCalcspreadsheet for CP/M, which would go on to become the market leader and de facto standard on CP/M. Supercalc would go on to be a competitor in the spreadsheet market in the MS-DOS world.AutoCAD,a CAD application from Autodesk debuted on CP/M. A host of compilers and interpreters for popularprogramming languagesof the time (such asBASIC,Borland'sTurbo Pascal,FORTRANand evenPL/I[55]) were available, among them several of the earliestMicrosoftproducts.

CP/M software often came withinstallersthat adapted it to a wide variety of computers.[56]The source code for BASIC programs was easily accessible, and most forms ofcopy protectionwere ineffective on the operating system.[57]A Kaypro II owner, for example, would obtain software on Xerox 820 format, then copy it to and run it from Kaypro-format disks.[58]

The lack of standardized graphics support limitedvideo games,but various character and text-based games wereported,such asTelengard,[59]Gorillas,[60]Hamurabi,Lunar Lander,along with earlyinteractive fictionincluding theZorkseries andColossal Cave Adventure.Text adventurespecialistInfocomwas one of the few publishers to consistently release their games in CP/M format.Lifeboat Associatesstarted collecting and distributing user-written "free" software. One of the first wasXMODEM,which allowed reliable file transfers viamodemand phone line. Another program native to CP/M was theoutline processorKAMAS.[citation needed]

Transient Program Area

[edit]

The read/write memory between address 0100 hexadecimal and the lowest address of the BDOS was theTransient Program Area(TPA) available for CP/M application programs. Although all Z80 and 8080 processors could address 64 kilobytes of memory, the amount available for application programs could vary, depending on the design of the particular computer. Some computers used large parts of the address space for such things as BIOS ROMs, or video display memory. As a result, some systems had more TPA memory available than others. Bank switching was a common technique that allowed systems to have a large TPA while switching out ROM or video memory space as needed. CP/M 3.0 allowed parts of the BDOS to be in bank-switched memory as well.

Debugging application

[edit]

CP/M came with a Dynamic Debugging Tool, nicknamedDDT(after the insecticide, i.e. abug-killer), which allowed memory and program modules to be examined and manipulated, and allowed a program to be executed one step at a time.[61][62][63]

Resident programs

[edit]

CP/M originally did not support the equivalent ofterminate and stay resident(TSR) programs as under DOS. Programmers could write software that could intercept certain operating system calls and extend or alter their functionality. Using this capability, programmers developed and sold auxiliarydesk accessoryprograms, such asSmartKey,a keyboard utility to assign any string of bytes to any key.[64] CP/M 3, however, added support fordynamically loadableResident System Extensions(RSX).[53][19]A so-callednull command filecould be used to allow CCP to load an RSX without a transient program.[53][19]Similar solutions like RSMs (forResident System Modules) were also retrofitted to CP/M 2.2 systems by third-parties.[65][66][67]

Software installation

[edit]

Although CP/M provided somehardware abstractionto standardize the interface to disk I/O or console I/O, application programs still typically required installation to make use of all the features of such equipment as printers and terminals. Often these were controlled byescape sequenceswhich had to be altered for different devices. For example, the escape sequence to select bold face on a printer would have differed among manufacturers, and sometimes among models within a manufacturer's range. This procedure was not defined by the operating system; a user would typically run an installation program that would either allow selection from a range of devices, or else allow feature-by-feature editing of the escape sequences required to access a function. This had to be repeated for each application program, since there was no central operating system service provided for these devices.

The initialization codes for each model of printer had to be written into the application. To use a program such as Wordstar with more than one printer (say, a fast dot-matrix printer or a slower but presentation-qualitydaisy wheelprinter), a separate version of Wordstar had to be prepared, and one had to load the Wordstar version that corresponded to the printer selected (and exiting and reloading to change printers).

Disk formats

[edit]

IBM System/34andIBM 3740's single-density, single-sided format is CP/M's standard 8-inchfloppy-disk format.No standard 5.25-inch CP/M disk format exists, with Kaypro,Morrow Designs,Osborne, and others each using their own.[68][23][69]InfoWorldestimated in September 1981 that "about two dozen formats were popular enough that software creators had to consider them to reach the broadest possible market".[21]JRT Pascal,for example, provided versions on 5.25-inch disk forNorth Star,Osborne, Apple,Heathhard sectorandsoft sector,andSuperbrain,and one 8-inch version.[70]Ellis Computing also offered its software for both Heath formats, and 16 other 5.25-inch formats including two different TRS-80 CP/M modifications.[71]

Certain disk formats were more popular than others. Most software was available in the Xerox 820 format, and other computers such as the Kaypro II were compatible with it.[58][72]No single manufacturer, however, prevailed in the 5.25-inch era of CP/M use, and disk formats were often not portable between hardware manufacturers. A software manufacturer had to prepare a separate version of the program for each brand of hardware on which it was to run. With some manufacturers (Kaypro is an example), there was not even standardization across the company's different models. Because of this situation, disk format translation programs, which allowed a machine to read many different formats, became popular and reduced the confusion, as did programs like Kermit, which allowed transfer of data and programs from one machine to another using theserialports that most CP/M machines had.

Various formats were used depending on the characteristics of particular systems and to some degree the choices of the designers. CP/M supported options to control the size of reserved and directory areas on the disk, and the mapping between logical disk sectors (as seen by CP/M programs) and physical sectors as allocated on the disk. There were many ways to customize these parameters for every system[73]but once they had been set, no standardized way existed for a system to load parameters from a disk formatted on another system.

The degree of portability between different CP/M machines depended on the type of disk drive and controller used since many different floppy types existed in the CP/M era in both 8-inch and 5.25-inch format. Disks could be hard or soft sectored, single or double density, single or double sided, 35 track, 40 track, 77 track, or 80 track, and the sector layout, size and interleave could vary widely as well. Although translation programs could allow the user to read disk types from different machines, the drive type and controller were also factors. By 1982, soft-sector, single-sided, 40-track 5.25-inch disks had become the most popular format to distribute CP/M software on as they were used by the most common consumer-level machines of that time, such as the Apple II, TRS-80, Osborne 1, Kaypro II, and IBM PC. A translation program allowed the user to read any disks on his machine that had a similar format—for example, the Kaypro II could readTRS-80,Osborne,IBM PC,andEpsondisks. Other disk types such as 80 track or hard sectored were completely impossible to read. The first half of double-sided disks (like those of the Epson QX-10) could be read because CP/M accessed disk tracks sequentially with track 0 being the first (outermost) track of side 1 and track 79 (on a 40-track disk) being the last (innermost) track of side 2. Apple II users were unable to use anything but Apple's GCR format and so had to obtain CP/M software on Apple format disks or else transfer it via serial link.

The fragmented CP/M market, requiring distributors either to stock multiple formats of disks or to invest in multiformat duplication equipment, compared with the more standardizedIBM PCdisk formats, was a contributing factor to the rapid obsolescence of CP/M after 1981.

One of the last notable CP/M-capable machines to appear was theCommodore 128in 1985, which had a Z80 for CP/M support in addition to its native mode using a 6502-derivative CPU. Using CP/M required either a1571or1581disk drive which could read soft-sector 40-trackMFM-format disks.

The first computer to use a 3.5-inch floppy drive, theSony SMC-70,[74]ran CP/M 2.2. The Commodore 128,Bondwell-2laptop, Micromint/Ciarcia SB-180,[75]MSXandTRS-80 Model 4(running Montezuma CP/M 2.2) also supported the use of CP/M with 3.5-inch floppy disks. CP/AM,Applied Engineering's version of CP/M for the Apple II, also supported 3.5-inch disks (as well as RAM disks on RAM cards compatible with the Apple II Memory Expansion Card).[76]TheAmstrad PCWran CP/M using 3-inch floppy drives at first, and later switched to the 3.5 inch drives.

File system

[edit]

File names were specified as a string of up to eight characters, followed by a period, followed by a file name extension of up to three characters ("8.3" filename format). The extension usually identified the type of the file. For example,.COMindicated an executable program file, and.TXTindicated a file containingASCIItext. Characters in filenames entered at the command prompt were converted to upper case, but this was not enforced by the operating system. Programs (MBASICis a notable example) were able to create filenames containing lower-case letters, which then could not easily be referenced at the command line.

Each disk drive was identified by adrive letter,for example, driveAand driveB.To refer to a file on a specific drive, the drive letter was prefixed to the file name, separated by a colon, e.g.,A:FILE.TXT.With no drive letter prefixed, access was to files on the current default drive.[77]

File size was specified as the number of 128-byterecords(directly corresponding to disk sectors on 8-inch drives) occupied by a file on the disk. There was no generally supported way of specifying byte-exact file sizes. The current size of a file was maintained in the file'sFile Control Block(FCB) by the operating system. Since many application programs (such astext editors) prefer to deal with files as sequences of characters rather than as sequences of records, by convention text files were terminated with acontrol-Zcharacter (ASCIISUB,hexadecimal1A). Determining theendof atext filetherefore involved examining the last record of the file to locate the terminating control-Z. This also meant that inserting a control-Z character into the middle of a file usually had the effect of truncating the text contents of the file.

With the advent of larger removable and fixed disk drives, disk de-blocking formulas were employed which resulted in more disk blocks per logical file allocation block. While this allowed for larger file sizes, it also meant that the smallest file which could be allocated increased in size from 1KB(on single-density drives) to 2 KB (on double-density drives) and so on, up to 32 KB for a file containing only a single byte. This made for inefficient use of disk space if the disk contained a large number of small files.

File modificationtime stampswere not supported in releases up to CP/M 2.2, but were an optional feature in MP/M and CP/M 3.0.[19]

CP/M 2.2 had no subdirectories in the file structure, but provided 16 numbered user areas to organize files on a disk. To change user one had to simply type "User X" at the command prompt, X being the user number. Security was non-existent and considered unnecessary on a personal computer. The user area concept was to make the single-user version of CP/M somewhat compatible with multi-user MP/M systems. A common patch for the CP/M and derivative operating systems was to make one user area accessible to the user independent of the currently set user area. A USER command allowed the user area to be changed to any area from 0 to 15. User 0 was the default. If one changed to another user, such as USER 1, the material saved on the disk for this user would only be available to USER 1; USER 2 would not be able to see it or access it. However, files stored in the USER 0 area were accessible to all other users; their location was specified with a prefatorypath,since the files of USER 0 were only visible to someone logged in as USER 0. The user area feature arguably had little utility on small floppy disks, but it was useful for organizing files on machines withhard drives.The intent of the feature was to ease use of the same computer for different tasks. For example, a secretary could dodata entry,then, after switching USER areas, another employee could use the machine to dobillingwithout their files intermi xing.

Graphics

[edit]
MBASICtext output displayed on a monochrome monitor typical for that time

Although graphics-capable S-100 systems existed from the commercialization of theS-100 bus,CP/M did not provide any standardized graphics support until 1982 withGSX(Graphics System Extension). Owing to the small amount of available memory, graphics was never a common feature associated with 8-bit CP/M operating systems. Most systems could only display rudimentaryASCII artcharts and diagrams intext modeor by using a customcharacter set.Some computers in theKayproline and theTRS-80 Model 4had video hardware supporting block graphics characters, and these were accessible to assembler programmers and BASIC programmers using the CHR$ command. The Model 4 could display 640 by 240 pixel graphics with an optional high resolution board.

Derivatives

[edit]
CP/M derivativeSCPrunning on an East German robotronPC 1715
CP/J version 2.21 running on anElwro 804 Junior

Official

[edit]

Some companies made official enhancements of CP/M based on Digital Research source code. An example isIMDOSfor theIMSAI 8080computer made byIMS Associates, Inc.,a clone of the famousAltair 8800.

Compatible

[edit]

Other CP/M compatible OSes were developed independently and made no use of Digital Research code. Some contemporary examples were:

  • Cromemco CDOSfromCromemco
  • MSX-DOSfor the MSX range of computers is CP/M-compatible and can run CP/M programs.
  • TheEpson QX-10shipped with a choice of CP/M or the compatible TPM-II or TPM-III.
  • The BritishZX SpectrumcompatibleSAM Coupéhad an optional CP/M-2.2 compatible OS called Pro-DOS.
  • The Amstrad/Schneider CPC series 6xx (disk-based) and PCW series computers were bundled with an CP/M disk pack.
  • TheHusky (computer)ran a ROM-based menu-driven program loader called DEMOS which could run many CP/M applications.
  • ZSDOS is a replacement BDOS for CP/M-80 2.2 written by Harold F. Bower and Cameron W. Cotrill.
  • CPMish is a new FOSS CP/M 2.2-compatible operating system which originally contained no DR code. It includes ZSDOS as its BDOS and ZCPR (seeearlier) as the command processor. Since Bryan Sparks, the president of DR owners Lineo, granted permission in 2022 to modify and redistribute CP/M code, developer David Given is updating CPMish with some parts of the original DR CP/M.
  • LokiOSis a CP/M 2.2 compatible OS. Version 0.9 was publicly released in 2023 by David Kitson as a solo-written Operating System exercise, intended for theOpen Spectrum Projectand includes source code for theBIOS,BDOSandCommand-line interfaceas well as other supporting applications and drivers. The distribution also includes original DR Source code and a utility to allow users to hot-swap OS components (e.g., BDOS, CCP) on the fly.

Enhancements

[edit]

Some CP/M compatible operating systems extended the basic functionality so far that they far exceeded the original, for example the multi-processor capableTurboDOS.

Eastern bloc

[edit]

A number of CP/M-80 derivatives existed in the former Eastern Bloc under various names, including SCP (Single User Control Program[de]), SCP/M, CP/A,[78]CP/J, CP/KC, CP/KSOB, CP/L, CP/Z, MICRODOS, BCU880, ZOAZ, OS/M, TOS/M, ZSDOS, M/OS, COS-PSA, DOS-PSA, CSOC, CSOS, CZ-CPM, DAC, HC and others.[79][80]There were also CP/M-86 derivatives namedSCP1700,CP/KandK8918-OS.[80]They were produced by the East GermanVEB Robotronand others.[80][79][78]

Legacy

[edit]

A number of behaviors exhibited byMicrosoft Windowsare a result ofbackward compatibilitywith MS-DOS, which in turn attempted some backward compatibility with CP/M. Thedrive letterand8.3 filenameconventions in MS-DOS (and early Windows versions) were originally adopted from CP/M.[81]Thewildcardmatching characters used by Windows (? and *) are based on those of CP/M,[82]as are the reserved filenames used toredirectoutput to aprinter( "PRN:" ), and theconsole( "CON:" ). The drive names A and B were used to designate the two floppy disk drives that CP/M systems typically used; when hard drives appeared, they were designated C, which survived into MS-DOS as theC:\>command prompt.[83]Thecontrol character^Zmarking theend of some text filescan also be attributed to CP/M.[84]Various commands in DOS were modelled after CP/M commands; some of them even carried the same name, like DIR, REN/RENAME, or TYPE (and ERA/ERASE in DR-DOS). File extensions like.TXTor.COMare still used to identify file types on many operating systems.

In 1997 and 1998,Calderareleased some CP/M 2.2 binaries andsource codeunder anopen source license,also allowing the redistribution and modification of further collected Digital Research files related to the CP/M and MP/M families through Tim Olmstead's "The Unofficial CP/M Web site" since 1997.[85][86][87]After Olmstead's death on 12 September 2001,[88]the distribution license was refreshed and expanded byLineo,who had meanwhile become the owner of those Digital Research assets, on 19 October 2001.[89][90][1][91] In October 2014, to mark the 40th anniversary of the first presentation of CP/M, theComputer History Museumreleased earlysource codeversions of CP/M.[92]

As of 2018,there are a number of activevintage, hobby and retro-computerpeople and groups, and some small commercial businesses, still developing and supporting computer platforms that use CP/M (mostly 2.2) as the host operating system.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abGasperson, Tina (2001-11-26)."CP/M collection is back online with an Open Source licence - Walk down memory lane".The Register.Archivedfrom the original on 2017-09-01.
  2. ^abMann, Stephen (1983-08-15)."CP/M Plus, a third, updated version of CP/M".InfoWorld.Vol. 5, no. 33. p. 49.ISSN0199-6649.
  3. ^abcSandberg-Diment, Erik (1983-05-03)."Personal Computers: The Operating System in the middle".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 2019-12-23.Retrieved2019-11-15.
  4. ^abcMarkoff, John (1994-07-13)."Gary Kildall, 52, Crucial Player In Computer Development, Dies".The New York Times.Archivedfrom the original on 2017-10-03.Retrieved2019-11-18.
  5. ^abShustek, Len (2016-08-02)."In His Own Words: Gary Kildall".Remarkable People.Computer History Museum.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-12-17.
  6. ^abcKildall, Gary Arlen(2016-08-02) [1993].Kildall, Scott;Kildall, Kristin (eds.).Computer Connections: People, Places, and Events in the Evolution of the Personal Computer Industry(Manuscript, part 1). Kildall Family.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-11-17.Retrieved2016-11-17.
  7. ^Newton, Harry (2000).Newton's Telecom Dictionary.New York, New York, US:CMP Books.pp.228.ISBN1-57820-053-9.
  8. ^Dahmke, Mark (1983-07-01)."CP/M Plus: The new disk operating system is faster and more efficient than CP/M".BYTE Magazine.Vol. 8, no. 7. p. 360.
  9. ^"Compupro 8/16".old-computers.Archived fromthe originalon 2016-01-03.Retrieved2022-04-21.
  10. ^Cole, Maggie (1981-05-25)."Gary Kildall and the Digital Research Success Story".InfoWorld.Vol. 3, no. 10. Palo Alto, California, US. pp. 52–53.ISSN0199-6649.Archivedfrom the original on 2024-07-01.Retrieved2020-09-25.
  11. ^Freiberger, Paul(1982-07-05)."History of microcomputing, part 3: software genesis".InfoWorld.Vol. 4, no. 26. Palo Alto, California, US. p. 41.ISSN0199-6649.Archivedfrom the original on 2024-07-01.Retrieved2020-09-25.
  12. ^Waite, Mitchell; Lafore, Robert W.; Volpe, Jerry (1982).The Official Book for the Commodore 128.H.W. Sams. p. 110.ISBN978-0-67222456-0.
  13. ^abcdKildall, Gary Arlen(January 1980)."The History of CP/M, The Evolution Of An Industry: One Person's Viewpoint".Dr. Dobb's Journal.Vol. 5, no. 1 #41. pp. 6–7.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-11-24.Retrieved2013-06-03.
  14. ^abcdKildall, Gary Arlen(June 1975),CP/M 1.1 or 1.2 BIOS and BDOS for Lawrence Livermore Laboratories
  15. ^Johnson, Herbert R. (2009-01-04)."CP/M and Digital Research Inc. (DRI) History".retrotechnology.Archivedfrom the original on 2008-08-20.Retrieved2009-01-28.
  16. ^Warren, Jim(April 1976). "First word on a floppy-disk operating system".Dr. Dobb's Journal.Vol. 1, no. 4. Menlo Park, California, US. p. 5.Subtitle: Command language & facilities similar to DECSYSTEM-10.
  17. ^Digital Research(1978).CP/M.Pacific Grove, California, US:Digital Research.OCLC221485970.
  18. ^Freiberger, Paul;Michael Swaine(2000).Fire in the Valley: The Making of the Personal Computer.McGraw-Hill. p. 175.ISBN0071358927– via the Internet Archive.
  19. ^abcdefghBrown, David K.;Strutynski, Kathryn;Wharton, John Harrison(1983-05-14)."Tweaking more performance from an operating system - Hashing, caching, and memory blocking are just a few of the techniques used to punch up performance in the latest version of CP/M".System Design/Software.Computer Design - The Magazine of Computer Based Systems.Vol. 22, no. 6. Littleton, Massachusetts, US:PennWell Publications/PennWell Publishing Company.pp.193–194, 196, 198, 200, 202, 204.ISSN0010-4566.OCLC1564597.CODENCMPDA.ark:/13960/t3hz07m4t.Retrieved2021-08-14.(7 pages)
  20. ^ab"Kathryn Betty Strutynski".Monterey Herald(Obituary). 2010-06-19.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-08-14.Retrieved2021-08-10– viaLegacy.
  21. ^abHogan, Thom (1981-09-14)."State of Microcomputing / Some Horses Running Neck and Neck".pp. 10–12.Archivedfrom the original on 2024-06-24.Retrieved2019-04-08.
  22. ^Wise, Deborah (1982-05-10)."Mainframe makers court third-party vendors for micro software".InfoWorld.Vol. 4, no. 18. pp. 21–22.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-03-18.Retrieved2015-01-25.
  23. ^abMeyer, Edwin W. (1982-06-14)."The Xerox 820, a CP/M-operated system from Xerox".InfoWorld.Vol. 4, no. 23. pp. 101–104.Archivedfrom the original on 2024-07-01.Retrieved2019-03-30.
  24. ^da Cruz, Frank (1984-04-27)."New release of KERMIT for CP/M-80".Info-Kermit Digest(Mailing list). Kermit Project, Columbia University.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-04-17.Retrieved2016-02-23.[1]
  25. ^Clarke, A.; Eaton, J. M.; David, D. Powys Lybbe (1983-10-26).CP/M - the Software Bus: A Programmer's Companion.Sigma Press.ISBN978-0905104188.
  26. ^Johnson, Herbert R. (2014-07-30)."CP/M and Digital Research Inc. (DRI) History".Archivedfrom the original on 2021-06-29.Retrieved2021-06-29.
  27. ^Swaine, Michael(1997-04-01)."Gary Kildall and Collegial Entrepreneurship".Dr. Dobb's Journal.Archivedfrom the original on 2007-01-24.Retrieved2006-11-20.
  28. ^Bunnell, David (February 1982)."The Man Behind The Machine? / A PC Exclusive Interview With Software Guru Bill Gates".PC Magazine.Vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 16–23 [20].Archivedfrom the original on 2013-05-09.Retrieved2012-02-17.
  29. ^"Radio Shack Computer Catalog RSC-12 page 28".radioshackcomputercatalogs.Tandy/Radio Shack.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-10-13.Retrieved2016-07-06.
  30. ^ab"Digital Research Has CP/M-86 for IBM Displaywriter"(PDF).Digital Research News - for Digital Research Users Everywhere.1(1). Pacific Grove, California, US:Digital Research, Inc.:2, 5, 7. November 1981. Fourth Quarter.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2021-04-17.Retrieved2020-01-18.
  31. ^Maher, Jimmy (2017-07-31)."The complete history of the IBM PC, part two: The DOS empire strikes".Ars Technica.p. 3.Archivedfrom the original on 2019-07-08.Retrieved2019-09-08.
  32. ^abKildall, Gary Arlen(1982-09-16)."Running 8-bit software on dual-processor computers"(PDF).Electronic Design:157.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2017-08-19.Retrieved2017-08-19.
  33. ^Snyder, John J. (June 1983)."A DEC on Every Desk?".BYTE.Vol. 8, no. 6. pp. 104–106.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-01-02.Retrieved2015-02-05.
  34. ^"M 68 / M 68 MX".Archived fromthe originalon 2016-03-06.Retrieved2012-09-17.
  35. ^Thomas, Rebecca A.; Yates, Jean L. (1981-05-11)."Books, Boards and Software for The New 16-Bit Processors".InfoWorld- The Newspaper for the Microcomputing Community.Vol. 3, no. 9.Popular Computing, Inc.pp. 42–43.ISSN0199-6649.Retrieved2020-01-24.
  36. ^Olmstead, Tim; Chaudry, Gabriele "Gaby"."Digital Research Source Code".Archivedfrom the original on 2016-02-05.
  37. ^Digital Research (1981):XLT86 - 8080 to 8086 Assembly Language Translator - User's GuideArchived2016-11-18 at theWayback MachineDigital Research Inc, Pacific Grove
  38. ^Pournelle, Jerry(March 1984)."New Machines, Networks, and Sundry Software".BYTE.Vol. 9, no. 3. p. 46.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-02-02.Retrieved2013-10-22.
  39. ^Isaacson, Walter(2014).The Innovators: How a Group of Inventors, Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution.Simon & Schuster.p. 358.ISBN978-1-47670869-0.
  40. ^Bellis, Mary."Inventors of the Modern Computer Series - The History of the MS-DOS Operating Systems, Microsoft, Tim Paterson, and Gary Kildall".Archived fromthe originalon 2012-04-27.Retrieved2010-09-09.
  41. ^Magid, Lawrence J.(February 1982)."Baby Blue".PC Magazine.Vol. 1, no. 1. p. 49.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-03-18.Retrieved2015-01-04.
  42. ^Mace, Scott (1984-06-11)."CP/M Eludes Home Market".InfoWorld.Vol. 6, no. 24. p. 46.Archivedfrom the original on 2021-09-20.Retrieved2021-09-20.
  43. ^Groth, Nancy (1986-02-10)."Kaypro is retreating on CP/M".InfoWorld.Vol. 8, no. 6. p. 6.Archivedfrom the original on 2022-03-20.Retrieved2021-10-29.
  44. ^"ZCPR - oldcomputers.ddns.org".
  45. ^"The Wonderful World of ZCPR3".1987-11-30. Archived fromthe originalon 2019-12-23.Retrieved2019-11-18.
  46. ^"CP/M emulators for DOS".retroarchive.org/cpm.Luis Basto.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-07-09.Retrieved2016-07-06.
  47. ^Davis, Randy (December 1985 – January 1986). Written at Greenville, Texas, US."The New NEC Microprocessors - 8080, 8086, Or 8088?"(PDF).Micro Cornucopia.No. 27. Bend, Oregon, US:Micro Cornucopia Inc.pp. 4–7.ISSN0747-587X.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2020-02-11.Retrieved2020-02-11.
  48. ^"Plug-in CP/M coming".Personal Computer News.1984-01-14. p. 7.Retrieved2022-10-03.
  49. ^Hetherington, Tony (February 1985)."Sharp MZ-800".Personal Computer World.pp. 144–146, 149–150.Retrieved2022-10-03.
  50. ^Coles, Ray (June 1984)."Cheaper, simpler CP/M"(PDF).Practical Computing.p. 43.Retrieved2022-10-03.
  51. ^"AMI releases specs on CP/M microchip".Microsystems.June 1984. p. 12.Retrieved2023-03-25.
  52. ^ab"CP/M Operating System Manual"(PDF).Archived(PDF)from the original on 2019-12-14.Retrieved2019-02-23.
  53. ^abcCP/M Plus (CP/M Version 3) Operating System Programmers Guide(PDF)(2 ed.).Digital Research.April 1983 [January 1983].Archived(PDF)from the original on 2016-11-25.Retrieved2016-11-25.
  54. ^abCP/M Plus (CP/M Version 3) Operating System User's Guide(PDF).Digital Research. 1983.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2019-11-26.Retrieved2020-05-09.
  55. ^"PL/I Language Programmer's Guide"(PDF).Digital Research.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2019-09-25.Retrieved2019-11-18.
  56. ^Mace, Scott (1984-01-09)."IBM PC clone makers shun total compatibility".InfoWorld.Vol. 6, no. 2&3. pp. 79–81.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-03-16.Retrieved2015-02-04.
  57. ^Pournelle, Jerry(June 1983)."Zenith Z-100, Epson QX-10, Software Licensing, and the Software Piracy Problem".BYTE.Vol. 8, no. 6. p. 411.Archivedfrom the original on 2014-06-09.Retrieved2013-10-20.
  58. ^abDerfler, Frank J. (1982-10-18)."Kaypro II—a low-priced, 26-pound portable micro".InfoWorld.p. 59.Archivedfrom the original on 2014-01-01.Retrieved2013-10-22.
  59. ^Loguidice, Bill (2012-07-28)."More on Avalon Hill Computer Games on Heath/Zenith platforms".Armchair Arcade.Archived fromthe originalon 2015-07-23.Retrieved2015-07-22.
  60. ^Sblendorio, Francesco (2015-12-01)."Gorillas for CP/M".GitHub.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-02-05.Retrieved2015-07-22.
  61. ^"Section 4 - CP/M Dynamic Debugging Tool".CP/M 2.2.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-06-17.Retrieved2014-08-29.
  62. ^CP/M Dynamic Debugging Tool (DDT) - User's Guide(PDF).Digital Research.1978 [1976].Archived(PDF)from the original on 2014-10-28.Retrieved2014-08-29.
  63. ^Shael (2010-06-26) [2009-12-09]."DDT Utility".Archivedfrom the original on 2015-12-08.Retrieved2014-08-29.
  64. ^Brand, Stewart (1984).Whole Earth Software Catalog.Quantum Press/Doubleday.ISBN978-0-38519166-1.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-07-04.
  65. ^Lieber, Eckhard; von Massenbach, Thomas (1987). "CP/M 2 lernt dazu. Modulare Systemerweiterungen auch für das 'alte' CP/M".c't - magazin für computertechnik(part 1) (in German). Vol. 1987, no. 1.Heise Verlag.pp. 124–135.
  66. ^Lieber, Eckhard; von Massenbach, Thomas (1987). "CP/M 2 lernt dazu. Modulare Systemerweiterungen auch für das 'alte' CP/M".c't - magazin für computertechnik(part 2) (in German). Vol. 1987, no. 2.Heise Verlag.pp. 78–85.
  67. ^Huck, Alex (2016-10-09)."RSM für CP/M 2.2".Homecompuer DDR(in German).Archivedfrom the original on 2016-11-25.Retrieved2016-11-25.
  68. ^Pournelle, Jerry(April 1982)."The Osborne 1, Zeke's New Friends, and Spelling Revisited".BYTE.Vol. 7, no. 4. p. 212.Retrieved2021-05-24.
  69. ^Waite, Mitchell;Lafore, Robert W.;Volpe, Jerry (1985)."The CP/M Mode".The Official Book for the Commodore 128 Personal Computer.Howard W. Sams & Co.p. 98.ISBN0-672-22456-9.
  70. ^"Now: A Complete CP/M Pascal for Only $29.95!".BYTE(advertisement). Vol. 7, no. 12. December 1982. p. 11.Archivedfrom the original on 2016-07-21.Retrieved2016-10-01.
  71. ^"Ellis Computing".BYTE(advertisement). Vol. 8, no. 12. December 1983. p. 69.
  72. ^Fager, Roger; Bohr, John (September 1983)."The Kaypro II".BYTE.Vol. 8, no. 9. p. 212.Archivedfrom the original on 2014-03-02.Retrieved2013-10-20.
  73. ^Johnson-Laird, Andy(1983). "3".The programmer's CP/M handbook.Berkeley, California, US: Osborne/McGraw-Hill.ISBN0-88134-103-7.
  74. ^"Old-computers: The Museum".Archived fromthe originalon 2013-07-03.Retrieved2017-10-06.
  75. ^Ciarcia, Steve (September 1985)."Build the SB-180"(PDF).BYTEMagazine.CMP Media.p. 100.Archived(PDF)from the original on 2019-11-29.Retrieved2019-06-18.
  76. ^CP/AM 5.1 User Manual.Applied Engineering. p. 1.Retrieved2020-05-22.
  77. ^"CP/M Builtin Commands".discordia.org.uk.Archivedfrom the original on 2008-04-12.Retrieved2009-01-28.
  78. ^abPohlers, Volker (2019-04-30)."CP/A".Homecomputer DDR(in German).Archivedfrom the original on 2020-02-21.Retrieved2020-02-21.
  79. ^abKurth, Rüdiger; Groß, Martin; Hunger, Henry (2019-01-03)."Betriebssysteme".robotrontechnik.de(in German).Archivedfrom the original on 2019-04-27.Retrieved2019-04-27.
  80. ^abcKurth, Rüdiger; Groß, Martin; Hunger, Henry (2019-01-03)."Betriebssystem SCP".robotrontechnik.de(in German).Archivedfrom the original on 2019-04-27.Retrieved2019-04-27.
  81. ^Chen, Raymond."Why does MS-DOS use 8.3 filenames instead of, say, 11.2 or 16.16?".The Old New Thing.Archivedfrom the original on 2011-09-22.Retrieved2010-12-17.
  82. ^Chen, Raymond."How did wildcards work in MS-DOS?".The Old New Thing.Archivedfrom the original on 2011-05-08.Retrieved2010-12-17.
  83. ^Chen, Raymond."What's the deal with those reserved filenames like NUL and CON?".The Old New Thing.Archivedfrom the original on 2010-08-02.Retrieved2010-12-17.
  84. ^Chen, Raymond."Why do text files end in Ctrl+Z?".The Old New Thing.Archived fromthe originalon 2011-02-06.Retrieved2010-12-17.
  85. ^Olmstead, Tim (1997-08-10)."CP/M Web site needs a host".Newsgroup:comp.os.cpm.Archived fromthe originalon 2017-09-01.Retrieved2018-09-09.
  86. ^Olmstead, Tim (1997-08-29)."ANNOUNCE: Caldera CP/M site is now up".Newsgroup:comp.os.cpm.Archived fromthe originalon 2017-09-01.Retrieved2018-09-09.[2]
  87. ^"License Agreement".Caldera, Inc.1997-08-28.Archivedfrom the original on 2018-09-08.Retrieved2015-07-25.[3][permanent dead link][4][permanent dead link]
  88. ^"Tim Olmstead".2001-09-12. Archived fromthe originalon 2018-09-09.
  89. ^Sparks, Bryan Wayne(2001-10-19). Chaudry, Gabriele "Gaby" (ed.)."License agreement for the CP/M material presented on this site".Lineo, Inc.Archivedfrom the original on 2018-09-08.Retrieved2015-07-25.
  90. ^Chaudry, Gabriele "Gaby" (ed.)."The Unofficial CP/M Web Site".Archivedfrom the original on 2016-02-03.
  91. ^Swaine, Michael(2004-06-01)."CP/M and DRM".Dr. Dobb's Journal.Vol. 29, no. 6.CMP Media LLC.pp. 71–73. #361. Archived fromthe originalon 2018-09-09.Retrieved2018-09-09.[5]Archived2024-07-01 at theWayback Machine
  92. ^Laws, David (2014-10-01)."Early Digital Research CP/M Source Code".Computer History Museum.Archivedfrom the original on 2015-07-27.Retrieved2015-07-25.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]