Palauan nationality law

Palauannationality lawis regulated by the1980 Constitution of Palau,as amended; the 1994 Palau Citizenship Act, and its revisions; and international agreements entered into by the Palauan government.These laws determine who is, or is eligible to be, a national of Palau. The legal means to acquirenationality,formal legal membership in a nation, differ from the domestic relationship of rights and obligations between a national and the nation, known ascitizenship.Palauan nationality is typically obtained either on the principle ofjus soli,i.e. by birth in Palau or under the rules ofjus sanguinis,i.e. by birth abroad to parents with Palauan nationality.It can be granted to persons with an affiliation to the country through naturalization.

Acquiring Palauan nationality

Nationality in Palau is acquired at birth, or later in life by naturalization.

By birth

Birthright nationality applies to:

• Persons born in the territory to at least one parent who is a Palauan national or has legally recognized Palauan ancestry; or
• Persons born abroad to at least one parent who is a Palauan national or has legally recognized Palauan ancestry.

By naturalization

Nationality obtained through naturalization is available to those who have familial or historic relationship affiliations with Palau.Palau does not grant naturalization based upon residency in the country for a specified period of time, nor does it allow foreign spouses to derive nationality.Applicants for naturalization are required to have at least one parent who has recognized Palauan ancestry.Since 2010, in a ruling by the Appellate Division of the Palauan Supreme Court, inUcherremasech v. Hiroichi,foreign adopted children who have one Palauan parent can be naturalized.

Loss of nationality

Palauan nationals may not renounce their nationality.Denaturalizationmay occur if a person obtained naturalization through fraud, false representation, or concealment.

Dual nationality

Since 2008, Palau has alloweddual nationality.

History

Spanish period (1522–1898)

After Portuguese navigatorFerdinand Magellandied during his fleet's circumnavigation of the globe forCharles I, King of Spain,his shipTrinidadwas captained byGonzalo Gómez de Espinosa.Gómez's logs of 1522 reported two small islands were sighted at5° North latitude,which he namedSan Juan.HistorianAndrew Sharp,concluded the two islands wereFanaandSonsorol,now located in Palau.Spain formally claimed the territories in theMicronesian regionin 1686, but most of its focus was on Guam and the Philippines.In 1696 a group of Palauans were shipwrecked onSamarin thePhilippines.Interviewed by the missionaryPaul Klein(Pablo Clain), stones were arranged to form a map of their territory, which was later widely published in Europe. Its authenticity was debated and it sparked an interest in further discovery.Seven unsuccessful attempts were made to locate the islands Klein had described.In 1710, Francisco Padilla, captaining thepatacheSantissima Trinidad,made landfall on Sonsorol, the first verified European contact on Palau.

Until the 1780s Palau remained mostly isolated from European contact, though trading ships passed near it in route to China.Americanwhalersencountered the islands as early as 1832 and French explorerJules Dumont d'Urvillespent two months in Palau in the winter of 1838–1839, evaluating the potential for whaling.Seventy years of instability in the Spanish empire continued until 1874 with periods of conflict followed by calm only to erupt into insurrection again.The1812 Constitution of Cádizwas reinstated in 1836 and revoked a year later.TwoCarlist Warsfollowed by the1868 Revolution,led to a democratic experiment and the drafting of a new constitution in 1869. The constitution called for significant colonial reforms, but before they could be acted upon theThird Carlist Warand subsequentrestoration of the monarchyended its authority.During this period, the Pacific colonies in theCaroline,Gilbert,Marshall,and Palau Islands remained mostly autonomous until 1874, when the Spanish attempted to reassert their authority there.That year, German traderEduard Hernsheimfounded a trading station onMalakal Island.

A new constitution was adopted by Spain in 1876,which was extended to the colonies. Under its terms, anyone born in Spanish territory was considered to be Spanish, but did not necessarily have the same rights as those persons born in Spain.From the early part of the 19th century, there were conflicts among European powers, who were establishingspheres of influencein the Pacific.By the 1880s, British, German, and Japanese firms were regularly trading in Spanish territory. Spain responded by sending emissaries to negotiate treaties with island chiefs to reinforce the relationship of the islands and mother country.In 1885, Germany annexed the Marshalls and attempted to take control of the Caroline Islands.That year, Spain sent missionaries to Palau to spread Christianity in the island.Spain retained control of the Carolines and Palau by granting Germany the right to trade and establish naval stations in the territory.To legitimize the agreement, a papal decree was obtained which confirmed Spanish sovereignty in the Caroline Islands, but established that Germany had a claim to the islands if Spain later decided to relinquish its authority.Germany and Britain signed theAnglo-German Declarations about the Western Pacific Oceanin 1886 to delineate the terms of their interaction and establish the territories with which each was aligned.

In 1889, the first Spanish Civil Code was adopted and extended toPuerto Rico,Panama,and the Captaincy General of the Philippines, which included all of Spain's Pacific possessions.The Code established that Spanish nationality was acquired either from birth in Spanish territory or by descent from a Spanish national.Legitimate children could derive nationality from a father, but only illegitimate children could derive Spanish nationality from a mother, as a married woman was required to take the nationality of her husband.It also contained provisions for foreigners to naturalize.At the end of theSpanish–American Warin 1898, Germany agreed to support the United States' claims to Guam and the Philippines in exchange for American support of Germany's claim to the Caroline, Mariana and Palau islands.In 1899, Germany purchased these islands for 25 millionSpanish pesetas,(around £1 million,and equivalent to GBP £142,000,000 or US $143,000,000 in 2024, according to calculations based onretail price indexmeasure of inflation).

German colonial period (1899–1920)

Upon acquiring Palau in 1899, German administrators designated that governance would continue under the two high chiefs and six lesser chiefs who were chosen by the inhabitants.Under the terms of the Colonial Act of 1888, German colonies were not part of thefederal union,but they were also not considered foreign. Thus, laws that were extended to the colonies sometimes treated residents as nationals and other times as foreigners. Native subjects in the colonies were not considered to be German, but were allowed to naturalize.Naturalization required ten years residence in the territory and proof of self-employment. It was automatically bestowed upon all members of a family, meaning children and wives derived the nationality of the husband.TheNationality Law of 1913changed the basis for acquiring German nationality fromdomiciletopatrilineality,but did not alter derivative nationality.

From the time Germany took possession of Palau, Japanese traders had established strong ties there.At the outbreak ofWorld War I,Japan joined theAlliesand began an offensive to capture the German possessions in the Pacific.By October 1914, Japanese troops were in possession of Saipan. During their occupation maintained the German administrative system.At the end of the war, under terms of theTreaty of Versailles,Japan was granted theSouth Seas Mandatein 1919, which included the Caroline, Mariana,Marshall,and Palau islands.Terms of the mandate specified that islanders were not to be militarized and that social and economic development in the territory was to be of benefit to the local inhabitants.

Mandate, trustee period (1920–1978)

Between 1921 and 1922, administration for the Japanese Pacific colonies passed from the navy to civil authorities of the South Seas Bureau (Japanese:Nan'yō Chō).The native inhabitants of the islands were not equal to Japanese imperial subjects and were accorded different status.They were considered aliens, though if they met requirements of the 1899 Nationality Law, islanders could naturalize.Despite theLeague of Nations' mandate for Japan to treat the colonies as integral parts of the nation, Japan chose not to extend the constitution to their Pacific colonies.Japan surrendered its Pacific possessions at the end ofWorld War IIand the United States proposed retaining control over the former Japanese-mandated islands for security purposes.Mandates were replaced by Trust Territories to be overseen by a Trusteeship Council of theUnited Nations.In 1947, a trust agreement was drawn between the United Nations and the United States to establish theTrust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

Upon taking control of the region in July 1947, theUnited States Navydecreed the removal of Japanese immigrants and began the process of repatriating Japanese civilians.The Trust Territory was managed by the navy until 1951, at which time administration was passed to theUnited States Department of the Interior.The following year, the Code of the Trust Territory was introduced. It defined nationals as persons born in the territory prior to 22 December 1952, who had not acquired other nationality, or those born after that date in the territory. It also confirmed that children born abroad to parents who were nationals of the Trust Territory derived their parents' nationality until the age of twenty-one.Foreigners over the age of eighteen were allowed to naturalize in the Trust Territory.The Code, as amended in 1966 and 1973 authorized the Trust Territory to control immigration and granted authority to naturalize or denaturalize persons in the territory.Trust Territories nationals were not considered to be US nationals but were allowed to naturalize as would any other foreigner in the United States.

From 1969, the United States and representatives of the Trust Territory began negotiations to develop systems to terminate the trusteeship and provide pathways to independence.Because of the diversity of the districts of the territory, it was divided into four areas —Federated States of Micronesia,the Marshall Islands, theNorthern Mariana Islands,and Palau — as it was deemed that a single set of documents would not adequately serve the political needs for the region.In 1975, the Northern Mariana Islands chose independence and left the Trust Territory in 1978.Negotiations continued with the remaining districts of the territory. A constitution for Micronesia was drafted and in 1978 voters inKusaie,Ponape,Truk,andYapratified the document to form theFederated States of Micronesia.Voters in the Marshall Islands and Palau rejected the constitution.In 1979 the Marshall Islands created a separate constitution, as did Palau, but the United States objected to two land use provisions in the Palauan draft. The provisions refused to grant a foreign powereminent domainand the introduction of hazardous substances, including nuclear weapons, without the approval of 75% of the electorate of Palau.

Aplebisciteratified the constitution in July 1979 with 92% of the population in favor, but the High Court of the Trust Territories refused to certify the results because the legislature had nullified the draft based upon US objections.A second draft, striking the land use provisions was rejected by the voters later that year. A third draft, reinstating the two provisions, was passed by 79% of the voters in 1980.That year, aCompact of Free Associationwas drafted. It was signed by the US and Micronesia in 1982, by US and the Marshall Islands in 1983, and referendums observed by the UN approved the compacts that same year.In Palau, the plebiscite on the Compact did not reach the 3/4 approval mark required by the constitution and theSupreme Court of Palauconcurred that the Compact was not approved by voters.A second referendum on a modified Compact held in 1984 also did not meet the 75% majority requirement.That year, a third version of the Compact was signed by Reagan and newly electedPresident of PalauLazarus Salii.Receiving 72% approval in the vote, President Salii certified the results.Gibbons v Sallichallenged the certification and the Palauan Supreme Court ruled that the constitutional provision for 75% approval was required and further, that the revised Compact allowing transport of nuclear weapons or using nuclear ships violated the constitutional provisions.

Ignoring the Supreme Court decision, the US Congress approved the Compacts and PresidentRonald Reaganannounced in 1986 that the trusteeship was no longer applicable in the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, nor the Northern Marianas.Two additional plebescites failed to garner sufficient votes to approve the Compact for Palau, leading thePalau National Congressto amend the constitution to allow a simple majority. The amendment was approved, as was the seventh draft of the Compact by a 73.3% majority in 1987. President Salii was able to overcome a challenge to the process by agreeing in a signedMemorandum of Understandingthat the traditional council of chiefs had the authority to approve a cession of land to the United States by the Palauan president.Another lawsuit,Ngirmang v. Saliiwas filed in 1988, which nullified the constitutional amendment.A 1990 vote failed to achieve the required majority to accept the Palauan Compact, but that year theUnited Nations Security Council Resolution 683terminated the trusteeship for the former Trust Territories, except Palau.In 1992, the Supreme Court allowed the constitution to be amended and to reflect a simple majority of the voters was required for changes to the constitution and to ratify the Compact. After the constitutional amendment passed in a 1992 referendum, a final plebiscite was held on the Compact in 1993, which was approved by more than 2/3 of the voters.

Post-independence (1994–present)

After signing the Compact, Palau gained its independence on 1 October 1994.Palau's constitution at independence conferred nationality upon any person of the former Trust Territory who had at least one parent of Palauan ancestry and no other nationality.The original language of the Constitution prohibited dual nationality, but an amendment in 2008 permitted Palauans to hold dual nationality.

References

Bibliography

• Alessio, Dominic (2017)."9. '… territorial acquisitions are among the landmarks of our history': The Buying and Leasing of Imperial Territory".In Foster, Russell; Johnson, Matthew; Edward, Mark (eds.).The Crisis of the Twenty-First Century: Empire in the Age of Austerity.London:Routledge.pp. 74–96.ISBN978-1-351-54532-7.
• Bashford, Alison (2012)."6. Karl Haushofer's Geopolitics of the Pacific Ocean".In Fullagar, Kate (ed.).The Atlantic World in the Antipodes: Effects and Transformations since the Eighteenth Century.Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 120–145.ISBN978-1-4438-3806-1.
• Baumert, Thomas; Paradinas Márquez, Carmen; Sánchez Padilla, Andrés (2020).A History of Spanish Institutions.Madrid, Spain:ESIC Editorial.ISBN978-84-17914-90-5.
• Bennardo, Kevin (2011)."The Rights and Liberties of the Palau Constitution".Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal.12(2). Honolulu, Hawaii:William S. Richardson School of Law:1–122.ISSN1541-244X.Retrieved11 June2021– viaHeinOnline.
• Boyer, Don (1991)."Chapter VI. World War II".In Carrell, Toni (ed.).Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of Micronesia.Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers. Santa Fe, New Mexico:National Park Service,Southwest Region. pp. 197–265.OCLC27677429.
• Britain, David; Matsumoto, Kazuko (2015)."Chapter 14 - Palauan English"(PDF).In Williams, Jeffrey P.; Schneider, Edgar W.; Trudgill, Peter; Schreier, Daniel (eds.).Further Studies in the Lesser-Known Varieties of English.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.pp. 305–343.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139108652.ISBN978-1-139-10865-2.Retrieved9 June2021.– viaCambridge Core(subscription required)
• Campbell, Ian C. (1989).A History of the Pacific Islands.Berkeley, California:University of California Press.ISBN0-520-06900-5.
• Carrell, Toni L. (1991)."VII. Post World War II, the Nuclear Age to Present".In Carrell, Toni (ed.).Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of Micronesia.Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers. Santa Fe, New Mexico:National Park Service,Southwest Region. pp. 267–278.OCLC27677429.
• Carrell, Toni L.; Driver, Marjorie G. (1991)."IV. European Discovery, Contact and Colonization".In Carrell, Toni (ed.).Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of Micronesia.Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers. Santa Fe, New Mexico:National Park Service,Southwest Region. pp. 59–138.OCLC27677429.
• Carrell, Toni L.; McGrath, Thomas B. (1991)."V. Colonialism, World War I, and the Interwar Years".In Carrell, Toni (ed.).Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of Micronesia.Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Papers. Santa Fe, New Mexico:National Park Service,Southwest Region. pp. 139–196.OCLC27677429.
• Chen, Edward I-te (1984)."Part II. Chapter 6, The Attempt to Integrate the Empire: Legal Perspectives".In Myers, Ramon H.; Peattie, Mark R. (eds.).The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.pp. 240–274.ISBN0-691-10222-8.
• Commission on the Status of Women(November 1954).Nationality of Married Women(PDF)(Report). New York, New York:United Nations Economic and Social Council.E/CN.6/254.
• Cox Alomar, Rafael (2015)."7. The Ideological Decolonization of Puerto Rico's Autonomist Movement".In Neuman, Gerald L.; Brown-Nagin, Tomiko (eds.).Reconsidering the Insular Cases: The Past and Future of the American Empire.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.pp. 129–166.ISBN978-0-9796395-7-9.
• Dziedzic, Anna (February 2020)."Comparative Regional Report on Citizenship Law: Oceania"(PDF).cadmus.eui.eu.Badia Fiesolana:European University Institute.Archived(PDF)from the original on 30 April 2021.Retrieved30 April2021.
• Fahrmeir, Andreas K. (September 1997)."Nineteenth-Century German Citizenships: A Reconsideration".The Historical Journal.40(3). Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press:721–752.doi:10.1017/S0018246X97007383.ISSN0018-246X.JSTOR2639885.OCLC5548980323.Retrieved20 May2021.
• Fransman, Laurie (2011).Fransman's British Nationality Law(3rd ed.). Haywards Heath, West Sussex:Bloomsbury Professional.ISBN978-1-84592-095-1.
• Golson, Jack (1974)."Charles Andrew Sharp (1906–1974)".The Journal of Pacific History.9(1). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory:Australian National University:131–133.doi:10.1080/00223347408572249.ISSN0022-3344.OCLC5543874717.Retrieved18 May2021.– viaTaylor & Francis(subscription required)
• Hezel, Francis X.; Del Valle, Maria Teresa (1972)."Early European Contact with the Western Carolines: 1525–1750".The Journal of Pacific History.7.Canberra, Australian Capital Territory:Australian National University:26–44.doi:10.1080/00223347208572199.ISSN0022-3344.JSTOR25168089.OCLC5543861351.Retrieved9 June2021.
• Hinck, Jon (July 1990)."The Republic of Palau and the United States: Self-Determination Becomes the Price of Free Association"(PDF).California Law Review.78(4). Berkeley California:University of California, Berkeley, School of Law:915–971.doi:10.2307/3480717.ISSN0008-1221.JSTOR3480717.OCLC5544383883.Retrieved10 June2021.
• Isenberg, David (January 1985)."Reconciling Independence and Security: The Long Term Status of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands".Pacific Basin Law Journal.4(1–2). Los Angeles, California:UCLA School of Law:210–243.doi:10.5070/P841-2021926.ISSN0884-0768.OCLC1114719029.Retrieved22 May2021.
• Johnson, Donald D. (April 1970)."The Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands".Current History.58(344). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: D. M. Redmond: 233–239, 246.ISSN0011-3530.JSTOR45312273.OCLC9027256938.Retrieved21 May2021.
• Liebowitz, Arnold H. (1980)."The Marianas Covenant Negotiations"(PDF).Fordham International Law Journal.4(1). Manhattan, New York:Fordham University School of Law:19–79.ISSN0747-9395.OCLC8255019960.Archived(PDF)from the original on 7 June 2021.Retrieved7 June2021.
• Lockman, John (1762).Travels of the Jesuits, into Various Parts of the World: Particularly China and the East-Indies: Intermix'd with an Account of the Manners, Government, Civil and Religious Ceremonies, Natural History, and Curiosities, of the Several Nations Visited by Those Fathers.Vol. I. (2nd corrected ed.). London: Rose and Crown.OCLC3118976.
• Loeb, Isidore (August 1900)."The German Colonial Fiscal System".Publications of the American Economic Association.1(3). New York, New York:American Economic Association:40–72.ISSN1049-7498.JSTOR2485790.OCLC5791225492.Retrieved20 May2021.
• Macdonald, Barrie (2001).Cinderellas of the Empire: Towards a History of Kiribati and Tuvalu(Reprint ed.). Suva, Fiji:University of the South Pacific.ISBN978-982-02-0335-8.
• Manzano Cosano, David (2012).El sistema colonial hispánico en las Islas Marianas[The Hispanic Colonial System in the Mariana Islands].V Congreso Internacional Del Consejo de Estudios Latinoamericanos de Asia y de Oceania: "Fortaleciendo los intercambios en el Pacifico", 9 al 11 de octubre de 2012 [5th International Congress of the Council for Latin American Studies in Asia and Oceania: "Strengthening Exchanges in the Pacific", 9–11 October 2012](in Spanish). Manila:University of Asia and the Pacific.Retrieved10 June2021.
• Manzano Cosano, David (April 2016)."Filipinas en la historia del constitucionalismo español y su representación en las cortes españolas"[Philippines in the Spanish Constitutional History and its Representation in the Spanish Courts](PDF).Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional(in Spanish) (106). Madrid, Spain:Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales:273–302.doi:10.18042/cepc/redc.106.07.ISSN0211-5743.OCLC6032305166.Retrieved22 May2021.
• Michal, Edward J. (Fall 1993)."Protected States: The Political Status of the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands".The Contemporary Pacific.5(2). Honolulu, Hawaii:Center for Pacific Islands Studies,University of Hawaii Press:303–332.ISSN1043-898X.JSTOR23699959.OCLC5792386279.Retrieved28 May2021.
• Oehser, Paul Henry (1943).Proceedings of the Eighth American Scientific Congress Held in Washington May 10–18, 1940, Under the Auspices of the Government of the United States of America.Vol. 10: International Law, Public Law, and Jurisprudence. Washington, D.C.: Department of State.OCLC1181595500.
• Peattie, Mark R. (1984)."Part 1: 4. The Nanʻyō: Japan in the South Pacific 1885–1945".In Myers, Ramon H.; Peattie, Mark R. (eds.).The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.pp. 172–212.ISBN0-691-10222-8.
• Prows, Peter (Winter 2008)."A Mouse Can Roar: Small Island States, the United Nations, and the End of Free-for-All Fishing on the High Sea".Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy.19(1). Niwot, Colorado:University Press of Colorado:1–48.ISSN1050-0391.OCLC347715642.Retrieved11 June2021– viaHeinOnline.
• Rosas, Allan(1994)."Nationality and Citizenship in a Changing European and World Order".In Suksi, Markku (ed.).Law Under Exogenous Influences.Turku, Finland: Turku Law School. pp. 30–60.ISBN978-951-29-0284-2.
• Sharp, Andrew (1962).The Discovery of the Pacific Islands.London:Oxford University Press.OCLC1057949923.
• Spennemann, Dirk H. R. (2011). "2. The German Colonial Period (1899 -1914)". In Greenwood, Arin; Giacomazzi, Mia; Gardiner, Steven (eds.).The Northern Mariana Islands Judiciary: A Historical Overview(PDF).Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: Northern Marianas Judiciary Historical Society. pp. 7–18.ISBN978-0-615-42762-1.Archived(PDF)from the original on 13 January 2021.
• Storr, Cait (2020).International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law.Cambridge, United Kingdom:Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/9781108682602.ISBN978-1-108-68260-2.S2CID225252547.– viaCambridge Core(subscription required)
• US Board on Geographical Names (1954).Decisions on Names in the United States, Alaska and Puerto Rico July 1950 to May 1954.Washington, D.C.:United States Department of the Interior.OCLC620634.
• US Department of State (1964).Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.International Organization and Conference Series 53. Vol. 16th Annual Report: July 1, 1962 to June 30, 1963. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Office of United Nations Political Affairs. Publication 7676.
• Viñas Farré, Ramón (2009)."Evolución del derecho de nacionalidad en España: continuidad y cambios más importantes [Evolution of the Right of Nationality in Spain: Continuity and Most Important Changes]".In López, F. J. (ed.).Cursos de derecho internacional y relaciones internacionales de Vitoria-Gasteiz[International Law and International Relations Courses in Vitoria-Gasteiz] (in Spanish). Bilbao, Biscay: Servicio Editorial Universidad del País Vasco. pp. 275–313.ISBN978-84-9860-432-0.
• "Self-Rule for Palau".The Sydney Morning Herald.Sydney, New South Wales.Associated Press.12 November 1993. p. 7.Retrieved11 June2021– viaNewspapers.
• "Tiny Palau Isles, Last UN Trust Region, Join 'Family of Nations'".The Chicago Tribune.Chicago, Illinois.Associated Press.2 October 1994. p. 25.Retrieved11 June2021– viaNewspapers.