Jump to content

Panzer Battles(book)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Panzer Battles
AuthorFriedrich von Mellenthin
Original titlePanzerschlachten
LanguageGerman, English
GenreMemoirs
PublisherUniversity of Oklahoma Press
Publication date
1956 (U.S. edition)
Media typePrint

Panzer Battles(‹See Tfd›German:Panzerschlachten) is the English language title ofFriedrich von Mellenthin's memoirs of his service as a staff officer in thePanzerwaffeof theGerman ArmyduringWorld War II.

The first English edition, asPanzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War,was published in 1956 by theUniversity of Oklahoma Press.Panzer Battles was reprinted six times in the U.S. between 1956 and 1976.Panzer Battleswas one of several books by Wehrmacht generals that influence post-war thinking in the West about Russian capabilities.[1]

Content

[edit]

The book covers Mellenthin's personal recollections and operational information on the major operations in which he participated, across major theaters of the war, with substantial coverage of his time asErwin Rommel's intelligence officer in theAfrika Corpsand his time as the Chief of Staff forXXXXVIII Panzer Corpsin Russia.[2][3]

Reception

[edit]

Since its release in English in 1956Panzer Battleshas been widely read professionally and academically. The book was a staple on professional military reading lists in NATO member states and was widely cited in academia for decades.

Professional

[edit]

Panzer Battleshas been extensively cited in military reading lists and professional studies since its release.David T. Zabeckicalled it a seminal and comprehensive work on mechanized combined arms warfare and said its lessons and principles were of immeasurable value to the post-Vietnam American military.[4]Major Timothy Wray, writing for theU.S. Combat Studies Institute,wrote in 1986 thatPanzer Battleswas among a series of post-war memoirs that filled an early vacuum of good English language studies of the Eastern Front, causing an undue influence in the Western understanding of that conflict. Wray saysPanzer Battlesomits important data and context.[5]In 1997, the officialUnited States Marine Corpsreview of books for its professional military reading list, assembled byPaul Van Riperfor theMarine Corps Combat Development Command,lauded it as "a virtual Bible" on armored warfare, with special praise given to the "Psychology of the Russian Soldier" section and the book's maps, which it says offers more tactical and operational clarity than nearly any other military work.[6]

American generalNorman Schwarzkopfkept a copy with him during theGulf War.

Academic

[edit]

Soon after its release, Dartmouth history professor Henry L. Roberts, in a one-sentence "capsule review" inForeign Affairs,called it an "excellent account", offering "interesting observations".[7]

SovietologistColonel John Jessup considers the book a good representation of perspective from the "younger generation" of German officers. Military historianDavid Glantzcalled it an "operational/tactical account of considerable merit", which showed the negative impact of Hitler's interference in the military operations. He echoed the professional assessment of Col. Wray, pointing out that it was written without the benefit of either German or Soviet records and suffered from incomplete or incorrect interpretations of Soviet forces, dispositions and intentions.[3]Paleoconservativemilitary theoristWilliam S. Lindconsidered it excellent and full of valuable lessons, including it in hisManeuver Warfare Handbookbasic reading list for students of armored warfare.[8]

However, some historians and academics have taken issue with the political and historical context of the book.Wolfram Wettelisted Mellenthin among German generals he considered to have authored apologetic, uncritical studies on World War II.[9]Co-authorsRonald SmelserandEdward J. DaviescharacterizePanzer Battlesas an "exculpatory memoir" within a post-war revisionist narrative.[10]Another modern historian considered descriptions of Russians as "primitive" and with an "Asiatic" mindset to be derogatory or racist.[11][12]Robert Citinosaid Mellenthin's book bolstered Western stereotypes of theRed Armyas "a faceless and mindless horde" that aimed to "smash everything in its path through numbers, brute force and sheer size". Citino includedPanzer Battlesamong the German officers' memoirs that were "at best unreliable and at worst deliberately misleading", an opinion echoed by historian Daniel Franke, who characterized its impact on the post-war reputation of the Wehrmacht as "baleful", while still recommending it as an important book.[13][14]

Editions

[edit]
  • Mellenthin, Friedrich von (1971) [1956].Panzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War(First Ballantine Books ed.). New York: Ballantine Books.ISBN978-0-345-24440-6.
  • Panzer Battles.1956.Copy of book at the Internet Archive

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^Smelser, Ronald. (2008).The Myth of the Eastern Front: The Nazi-Soviet War in American Popular Culture.Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 131–135.ISBN978-0-521-83365-3.OCLC237148298.
  2. ^Berlin 1988.
  3. ^abGlantz 1987.
  4. ^Zabecki 2014,p. 985.
  5. ^Wray 1986.
  6. ^Van Riper 1997,pp. 36–37.
  7. ^Roberts 1956.
  8. ^Lind 1985.
  9. ^Wette 2007,p. 234.
  10. ^Smelser & Davies 2008,p. 90.
  11. ^Citino 2012,p. 205.
  12. ^Smelser & Davies 2008,p. 111.
  13. ^Citino 2012,pp. 204–205, 208.
  14. ^Franke 2013.

Bibliography

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]