Jump to content

Philocles, King of Sidon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Philocles(Greek:Φιλοκλής,romanized:Philokles) wasKing of Sidonand a military commander under thePtolemaic dynastyin the late 4th and early 3rd century BC, and one of the architects of Ptolemaic imperialism in the coasts ofAsia Minorand theAegean Sea.He served as an admiral in thePtolemaic navyduring theSecond Syrian War.[1]

His life is known only through inscriptions and a single literary passage.[2]Philocles' origin and early life are therefore unknown. The name of his father, Apollodorus, survives, but it is likely that despite the Greek names used in the Greek sources, both werePhoenicians,and most likely descendants or relatives of the royal line ofSidon.[2]

The date and circumstances of his acquiring of the royal title are unknown; after his capture of Sidon in 332 BCAlexander the Greatinstalled one Abdalonymos as king, but nothing further is known of him. Philocles is first securely attested as "King of the Sidonians" in anAthenianinscription of 286/5 BC.[3]Philocles however first appears much earlier, in a list of benefactors who donated money to rebuild the city ofThebes,which had been razed by Alexander. He is recorded twice in the list, as having donated the huge sum of 100talentsand as having donated an unspecified sum inAlexandriantalents. As the name is partially erased, it is unclear what title, if any, Philocles bore at the time. Since the list dates to the last decades of the 4th century—the reconstruction of Thebes was decreed byCassanderin 316 BC—and Sidon was under the control ofAntigonus I Monophthalmusat the time, it has been suggested that Philocles was inAntigonidservice originally, but his later career as a high-ranking and evidently trusted Ptolemaic official seems to argue against this. As Sidon itself did not come under the control ofPtolemy I Soteruntil 287 BC, therefore, Philocles either laid claim on the royal title as a claimant in exile, or he was originally simply a private citizen and a trusted agent of Ptolemy, and was only later elevated to the kingship. His donation of such a large amount of money to Thebes would then have to be considered as part of his role as a Ptolemaic agent, trying to curry favour with the Greek city-states.[4]

In his collection ofstratagems,the 2nd-century authorPolyaenusrecords that "Philocles, general of Ptolemy" took the city ofKaunosby treachery. It is likely that this Philocles is identical to the "King of the Sidonians", but the date is unclear: Kaunos was first captured by Ptolemy in 309 BC—thus confirming that Philocles was in Ptolemaic, rather than Antigonid, service at the time—but it then reverted to Antigonid rule until sometime afterc. 286 BC,which coincides with the Athenian inscription mentioning him.[5][6]A decree fromAspendoshonouring mercenaries who, under Philocles and the Ptolemaic general Leonidas, saved the city from an unspecified attack, has variously been dated between 306 BC and 287 BC. Given that Leonidas is otherwise attested mostly for the period 310–306 BC, an earlier date in that range seems the more likely, indicating again that Philocles was never in Antigonid service.[7]

In the late 280s, Philocles is attested in a series of inscriptions from various Greek islands, which show him intervening in various disputes and issues of governance in the city-states under Ptolemaic control. His title is unspecified, but he was clearly senior to thenesiarchosof theNesiotic League,and probably the overall commander of the Ptolemaic forces in the Aegean, perhaps with the title ofnauarchos.The last inscriptions concerning him date toc. 280/279 BC,indicating that this was the end of his career in the region.[8]According to Hans Hauben, this activity means that Philocles "should probably be considered the main architect, or at least one of the main architects, of early Ptolemaic expansion in the Mediterranean".[9]

References[edit]

  1. ^Chaniotis, Angelos (2018).Age of Conquests: The Greek World from Alexander to Hadrian.Cambridge, MA, United States: Harvard University Press. p. 268.ISBN9780674659643.
  2. ^abMerker 1970,p. 143.
  3. ^Merker 1970,pp. 143–144.
  4. ^Merker 1970,pp. 144–145.
  5. ^Merker 1970,p. 146.
  6. ^Hauben 2013,pp. 43–44.
  7. ^Merker 1970,pp. 146–147.
  8. ^Merker 1970,pp. 147–150.
  9. ^Hauben 2013,p. 45.

Sources[edit]