Jump to content

Preterite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thepreteriteorpreterit(/ˈprɛtərɪt/PRET-ər-it;abbreviatedPRETorPRT) is agrammatical tenseorverbform serving to denote events that took place or were completed in the past; in some languages, such as Spanish, French, and English, it is equivalent to thesimple pasttense. In general, it combines theperfective aspect(event viewed as a single whole; it is not to be confused with the similarly namedperfect) with thepast tenseand may thus also be termed theperfective past.In grammars of particular languages the preterite is sometimes called thepast historic,or (particularly in theGreekgrammatical tradition) theaorist. When the term "preterite" is used in relation to specific languages, it may not correspond precisely to this definition. In English it can be used to refer to the simple past verb form, which sometimes (but not always) expresses perfective aspect. The case ofGermanis similar: thePräteritumis the simple (non-compound) past tense, which does not always imply perfective aspect, and is anyway often replaced by thePerfekt(compound past) even in perfective past meanings.

Preterite may be denoted by theglossing abbreviationPRETorPRT.The word derives from the Latinpraeteritum(theperfectiveparticipleofpraetereo), meaning "passed by" or "past."

Romance languages[edit]

Latin[edit]

InLatin,theperfecttense most commonly functions as thepreterite,and refers to an actioncompletedin the past. If the past action was not completed, one would use the imperfect. The perfect in Latin also functions in other circumstances as apresent perfect.

Typical conjugation:

dūcō, dūcere, dūxī, ductus
ego -ī (dūxī)
-istī (dūxistī)
is, ea, id -it (dūxit)
nōs -imus (dūximus)
vōs -istis (dūxistis)
eī, eae, ea -ērunt (dūxērunt)

Dūxīcan be translated as (preterite) "I led", "I did lead", or (in the present perfect) "I have led."

A pronoun subject is often omitted, and usually used for emphasis.

French[edit]

InFrench,the preterite is known asle passé simple(the simple past). It is a past tense that indicates an action taken once in the past that was completed at some point in the past (translated: "<verb>ed" ). This is as opposed to the imperfect (l'imparfait), used in expressing repeated, continual, or habitual past actions (often corresponding to English's pastcontinuouswas/were <verb>ingorhabitualused to <verb>). In the spoken language, the compound tense known asle passé composé( "the compound past" ) began to compete with it from the 12th century onwards, and has since replaced it almost entirely.[1]French simple past is mostly used in a narrative way to tell stories and describe successive actions. Novelists use it commonly: it brings more suspense, as the sentence can be short without any temporal reference needed. In oral language, the simple past is rarely used except while telling a story; therefore, it would be atypical to hear it in a standard discussion.

Typical conjugations:

-er verbs (aimer) -ir verbs (finir) -re verbs (rendre) -oir(e) verbs1(vouloir) (croire) Irregular (tenir)2
je -ai (aimai) -is (finis) -is (rendis) -us (crus) tins
tu -as (aimas) -is (finis) -is (rendis) -us (crus) tins
il/elle/on -a (aima) -it (finit) -it (rendit) -ut (crut) tint
nous -âmes (aimâmes) -îmes (finîmes) -îmes (rendîmes) -ûmes (crûmes) tînmes
vous -âtes (aimâtes) -îtes (finîtes) -îtes (rendîtes) -ûtes (crûtes) tîntes
ils/elles -èrent (aimèrent) -irent (finirent) -irent (rendirent) -urent (crurent) tinrent
  1. alsoêtre(je fus…) andavoir(j'eus)
  2. includestenir,venir(je vins,tu vins,...), and all of their derivations

Romanian[edit]

Use in interwar Romania:
Area of useArea of partial use
Area of infrequent useNot used
Historical region ofOlteniahighlighted

InRomanian,the preterite is known asperfectul simplu(literally, the simple past or simple perfect). The preterite indicates a past accomplished action (translated: "verbed" ); however, this tense is not frequent in the official language and not frequent in the standard speech (not used in Republic of Moldova and not used in the Romanian regions of Transylvania, Muntenia and Moldova). The general tendency is to use the compound past (perfectul compus) to express a past action that is perceived as completed at the moment of speaking.

Simple past is still actively used in current speech in the southwestern part of Romania, especially inOltenia,but also inBanat,Crișana and Maramureș, mostly in rural areas. Usage of the preterite is very frequent in written narrative discourse, the simple past of the speech verbs being generally after a dialogue line in narration:

  • Aici avem o crimă!, zise polițistul.This is a murder! said the policeman.

When used in everyday speech in standard Romanian, the preterite is used with the value of recent past, a recently completed action:

  • Tocmai îl auzii pe George la radio.I have just heard George on the radio.

The second person is often used in questions about finishing an action in progress that is supposed to be over, giving the question a more informal tone:

  • Gata, citirăți?Are you done, have you read [the texts]?

The forms of the simple perfect are made of an unstressed stem of theinfinitive,a stressed suffix that is different in each group of verbs, and the endings-i, -și, -∅, -răm, -răți, -ră,[2]which are the same for all the verbs:

-a verbs (a intra) -ea verbs (a tăcea) -e verbs (a cere) -e verbs (a merge) -i verbs (a dormi) -î verbs (a coborî)
suffixa suffixu suffixu suffixse suffixi suffixâ/î
eu -ai (intrai) -ui (tăcui) -ui (cerui) -sei (mersei) -ii (dormii) -âi (coborâi)
tu -ași (intrași) -uși (tăcuși) -uși (ceruși) -seși (merseși) -iși (dormiși) -âși (coborâși)
el/ea -ă (intră) -u (tăcu) -u (ceru) -se (merse) -i (dormi) -î (coborî)
noi -arăm (intrarăm) -urăm (tăcurăm) -urăm (cerurăm) -serăm (merserăm) -irăm (dormirăm) -ârăm (coborârăm)
voi/dumneavoastră -arăți (intrarăți) -urăți (tăcurăți) -urăți (cerurăți) -serăți (merserăți) -irăți (dormirăți) -ârăți (coborârăți)
ei/ele -ară (intrară) -ură (tăcură) -ură (cerură) -seră (merseră) -iră (dormiră) -âră (coborâră)

Italian[edit]

InItalian,the preterite is calledpassato remoto(literally "remote past" ). It is a past tense that indicates an action taken once and completed far in the past (mangiai,"I ate" ). This is opposed to theimperfettotense, which refers to a repeated, continuous, or habitual past action (mangiavo,"I was eating" or "I used to eat" ) and to thepassato prossimo(literally "close past" ), which refers to an action completed recently (ho mangiato,"I have eaten" ).

In colloquial usage, the use of thepassato remotobecomes more prevalent going from theNorthto theSouthof Italy. While Northern Italians andSardiniansusepassato prossimoin any perfective situation, Southern Italians will usepassato remotoeven for recent events.

Typical conjugations:

-are verbs (parlare) [Regular] -ere verbs (credere)* [Irregular] -ere verbs (prendere)* -ire verbs (finire) essere
io -ai (parlai) -ei (credei) / -etti (credetti) -i (presi) -ii (finii) fui
tu -asti (parlasti) -esti (credesti) -esti (prendesti) -isti (finisti) fosti
lui -ò (parlò) -é (credé) / -ette (credette) -e (prese) -ì (finì) fu
noi -ammo (parlammo) -emmo (credemmo) -emmo (prendemmo) -immo (finimmo) fummo
voi -aste (parlaste) -este (credeste) -este (prendeste) -iste (finiste) foste
loro -arono (parlarono) -erono (crederono) / -ettero (credettero) -ero (presero) -irono (finirono) furono

*Many -ere verbs in Italian have stem alternations in the 1st person singular, 3rd person singular and 3rd person plural. Some verbs (with d/t in their stem, including credere) also have endings -etti (1st person singular), -ette (3rd person singular), and -ettero (3rd person plural). Additionally, unlike in most languages, the third person plural is stressed on the irregular root. (Posero is stressed on the first syllable (POH-se-ro), not the second syllable (poh-SEH-ro).)

In a few remarkable cases, all three options exist for a single verb, although usage of each of these forms may vary. Forperderefor example, the first person singular can occur aspersi(irregular and most correct form),perdeiorperdetti(compare to the past participle which can beperso(irregular, most correct) orperduto(regular)).

Portuguese[edit]

InPortuguese,the preterite is thepretérito perfeito.The Portuguese preterite has the same form as the Spanish preterite, but the meaning is like the "composed past" of French and Italian in that, for example,corrimeans both "I ran" and "I have run." As in other Romance languages, it is opposed to thepretérito imperfeito(imperfect). Note that there does exist apretérito perfeito composto(present perfect) but its meaning is not that of aperfect;instead it shows aniterative aspect.For example,tenho corridodoesnotmean "I have run" but rather "I've been running."

Typical conjugations:

-ar verbs (amar) -er verbs (correr) -ir verbs (partir) most irregular verbs ser/ir
eu -ei (amei) -i (corri) -i (parti) -e (soube) fui
tu -aste (amaste) -este (correste) -iste (partiste) -este (soubeste) foste
ele -ou (amou) -eu (correu) -iu (partiu) -e (soube) foi
nós -ámos (amámos)1 -emos (corremos) -imos (partimos) -emos (soubemos) fomos
vós -astes (amastes) -estes (correstes) -istes (partistes) -estes (soubestes) fostes
eles -aram (amaram) -eram (correram) -iram (partiram) -eram (souberam) foram

1Without theacute accentinBrazilian Portuguese.

Spanish[edit]

InSpanish,the preterite (pretérito perfecto simple,orpretérito indefinido) is averbtensethat indicates that an action taken once in the past was completed at a specific point in time in the past. (Traditional Spanish terminology calls all past tensespretéritos,irrespective of whether they express completed or incomplete actions or events.) Usually, a definite start time or end time for the action is stated. This is opposed to theimperfect,which refers to any repeated, continuous, or habitual past action. Thus, "I ran five miles yesterday" would use thefirst-personpreterite form of ran,corrí,whereas "I ran five miles every morning" would use the first-personimperfectform,corría.This distinction is actually one ofperfective vs. imperfective aspect.

The special spellings for the "yo" form of the preterite are listed below (the accent mark goes over the 'e'); these are needed to keep their respective sounds.

  • -gar verbs: -gué (jugar>jugué)
  • -car verbs: -qué (buscar>busqué)
  • -zar verbs: -cé (almorzar>almorcé)
  • -guar verbs: -güé (aguar>agüé)

The endings for -er and -ir verbs are identical.[3]

The third person singular and plural forms of all verbs ending in -uir and -oír, as well as some verbs ending in -aer (excluding traer), end in -yó and -yeron, respectively; these are needed to keep their respective sounds.

Examples of verbs that haveanomalous stems in the preteriteinclude most verbs ending in -ducir as well as most verbs that are irregular in the "yo" form of the present tense (including traer).

In most Iberian Mainland Spanish and, to a lesser extent,Mexican Spanish,there is still a strong distinction between the preterite and thepresent perfect.The preterite denotes an action that began and ended in the past, while thepresent perfectdenotes an action that began in the past and is over; thus,

  • Comítodo el día. (I ate all day long.)
  • He comidotodo el día (I have eaten all day.)

In most other variants of Spanish, such as in the Americas and in the Canary Islands, this distinction has tended to fade, with the preterite being used even for actions in the immediate pre-present with continuing relevance.[4]

Typical conjugations:

-ar verbs (hablar) -er verbs (comer) -ir verbs (vivir) most irregular verbs ser/ir
yo -é (hablé) -í (comí) -í (viví) -e (puse) fui
-aste (hablaste) -iste (comiste) -iste (viviste) -iste (pusiste) fuiste
él/ella
usted
-ó (habló) -ió (comió) -ió (vivió) -o (puso) fue
nosotros -amos (hablamos) -imos (comimos) -imos (vivimos) -imos (pusimos) fuimos
vosotros -asteis (hablasteis) -isteis (comisteis) -isteis (vivisteis) -isteis (pusisteis) fuisteis
ellos/as
ustedes
-aron (hablaron) -ieron (comieron) -ieron (vivieron) -ieron (pusieron) fueron

Germanic languages[edit]

InGermanic languages,the term "preterite" is sometimes used for thepast tense.

English[edit]

The majority ofEnglish's preterites (often calledsimple pastor justpast tense) are formed by adding-edor-dto the verb's plain form (bare infinitive), sometimes with spelling modifications. This is the result of the conjugation system ofweak verbs,already in the majority inOld English,being raised to paradigmatic status and eventaking over earlier conjugations of some old strong verbs.As a result, all newly introduced verbs have the weak conjugation. Examples:

  • Heplantedcorn and oats.
  • Theystudiedgrammar.
  • Sheshovedthe Viking aside. (Original preteritescēaf,from an Old English strong verb.)
  • Ifriendedhim on social media. (A verb with a weak preterite.)

A number of English verbs form their preterites bysuppletion,a result of eitherablaut,a regular set of sound changes (to an interior vowel) in the conjugation of astrong verb,or because the verb conjugations are the remains of a more complex system of tenses inirregular verbs:

  • Shewentto the cinema. (Preterite of "go"; uses a completely different verb - the Anglo-Saxon 'wendan' from which comes 'to wend'.)
  • Iatebreakfast late this morning. (Preterite of "eat." )
  • Heranto the store. (Preterite of "run." )

With the exception of "to be" andauxiliaryandmodal verbs,interrogativeand negative clauses do not use their main verbs' preterites; if theirdeclarativeor positive counterpart does not use any auxiliary or modal verb, then the auxiliary verbdid(the preterite ofdo) isinsertedand the main verb appears in its plain form, as aninfinitive:

  • Wasshe busy today?
  • Hewasnot there.
  • Couldshe play the piano when she was ten?
  • The editorhadnot read the book yet.
  • Didhe plant corn and oats?
  • Shedidnotgoto the cinema.

For more details, seeEnglish verbs,Simple past,andUses of English verb forms.

German[edit]

Germanhas a grammatical distinction between preterite (Präteritum) and perfect (Perfekt). (Older grammar books sometimes useImperfektinstead ofPräteritum,a borrowing from Latin terminology.) Originally the distinction was as strong as in English: The Präteritum was the standard, most neutral form for past actions, and could also express an event in the remote past, contrasting with thePerfekt,which expressed an event that has consequences reaching into the present.[5]

  • Präteritum:Es regnete."It rained. / It was raining." (I am talking about a past event.)
  • Perfekt:Es hat geregnet."It has rained." (The street is still wet.)

In modern German, however, these tenses no longer reflect any distinction in aspect ( "Es hat geregnet" means both rained/was raining), which parallels this lack of distinction in the present, which has no separate verb form for the present progressive ( "Es regnet": It rains, it is raining). The Präteritum now has the meaning of anarrativetense, i.e. a tense used primarily for describing connected past actions (e.g. as part of a story), and is used most often in formal writing and in literature.[6]

Typical conjugations with the wordsein(be) are:

Ind. Präsens Ind. Präteritum Konj. Präsens Konj. Präteritum
ich bin war sei wäre
du bist warst seist wärest
er/sie/es ist war sei wäre
wir sind waren seien wären
ihr seid wart seiet wäret
sie sind waren seien wären

For example, in spokenUpper German(in SouthGermany,AustriaandSwitzerland), beyond the auxiliary verbssein(to be),werden(to become),können(to be able),wollen(to want),haben(to have), the Präteritum is rarely used in the spoken language and informal writing, though the grammatical form is fundamental to producing thesubjunctiveand conditional forms, while compound verb conjugations are used instead.[7]Yiddishhas gone even further and has no preterite at all. Rather, there is only one past tense, which is formed using what was originally perfect.[8]The dialect of German spoken in North America known asPennsylvania Germanhas also undergone this change with the exception of the verbto be,which still retains a simple past.[9]

TheAlemannic Germanhas also largely lost the preterite form. The only exception were the speakers of the isolatedHighest AlemannicSaleytitschdialect which disappeared around 1963/64.[10]

Conjugations with the wordsiin(be) were:

Ind. Präsens Ind. Präteritum Konj. Präsens Konj. Präteritum
ich bìn wass siigì weijì
du bìscht wasscht siigìscht weijìscht
är/schi/äs ìscht wass siigì weijì
wier sin wassùn/wan siigì weijì
ier siit wassùt siigìt weijìt
schi sìn wassùn/wan siigì weijì

Semitic languages[edit]

The preterite was a common Semitic form, well attested in theAkkadian language,where the preterite almost always referred to the past and was often interchangeable with the perfect.[11]In the course of time the preterite fell into disuse in allWest Semitic languages,leaving traces such as the "imperfect withwaw-consecutive"in Hebrew and" imperfect with lam "in Arabic.[12]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^Emmanuelle Labeau, Carl Vetters, Patrick Caudal,Sémantique et Diachronie du Système Verbal Français,Éd. Rodopi B.V. 10 janvier 2007, Coll. Cahiers Chronos, p.125.
  2. ^Romanian Grammardetailed guide of Romanian grammar and usage.
  3. ^"Preterite vs Imperfect: Part I - StudySpanish".studyspanish.
  4. ^"Latin American Spanish: Preterite Versus Present Perfect [+7 Examples & Quiz] | Language Atlas".Retrieved2024-01-03.
  5. ^Die Grammatik[Grammar]. Mannheim: Duden Verlag. 1973. pp.84–86.ISBN3-411-00914-4.
  6. ^Die Grammatik[Grammar]. Mannheim: Duden Verlag. 1973. pp.90–91.ISBN3-411-00914-4.
  7. ^Bavariani machad,I'd do, comes from archaicich machete,which used to be both indicative of the preterite (today: ich machte) and subjunctive of the (in this respect rightly so-called) imperfect (today: ich machte in subclauses, ich würde machen in main clauses and colloquially).
  8. ^Jerold C. Frakes (2017).A Guide to Old Literary Yiddish.Oxford University Press.p. 60.ISBN978-0191087943.
  9. ^Huffines, Marion Lois (1984-12-01)."Pennsylvania German Stereotype: Particles, Prepositions, and Adverbs".Yearbook of German-American Studies.19:27.doi:10.17161/ygas.v19i.19369.ISSN0741-2827.
  10. ^Frei, Gertrud (1970).Walserdeutsch in Saley. Wortinhaltliche Untersuchungen zu Mundart und Weltsicht der altertümlichen Siedlung Salecchio/Saley (Antigoriotal)..Bern/Stuttgart: Haupt. pp. 362–371.ASINB0014PPI66.
  11. ^Wilfred van Soldt(1991).Studies in the Akkadian of Ugarit: dating and grammar.Butzon & Bercker. p. 506.ISBN3788713372.
  12. ^Zellig Harris(1939).Development of the Cannanite dialects: an investigation in linguistic history.American Oriental Society.p. 47.