Jump to content

Queerplatonic relationship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Queerplatonic relationships(QPR), also known asqueerplatonic partnerships(QPP), are committedintimate relationshipsbetweensignificant otherswhose relationship is notromanticin nature. A queerplatonic relationship differs from a closefriendshipby having the same explicit commitment, status, and structure as a formal romantic relationship, whilst it differs from a romantic relationship by not involving feelings of romantic love.[1]The concept originates inaromanticandasexualspaces in theLGBT community.[2]Like romantic relationships, queerplatonic relationships are sometimes said to involve a deeper and more profound emotional connection than typical friendship.

Definition[edit]

TheAsexual Visibility and Education Networkdefines queerplatonic relationships as "non-romantic significant-other relationships of 'partner status'".[3]

Angela Chen describes queerplatonic partnership as "one of the few explicit titles available to describe the social space between 'friend' and 'romantic partner'" for non-romantic partners who share the "intense relationship and the security of explicit validation" otherwise associated exclusively with romance.[2]

Julie Sondra Deckerwrites that QPR often "looks indistinguishable from romance when outside the equation", but should not be "assigned a romantic status if participants say it is not romantic". She also notes that observers can misread it as a typical close friendship in circumstances where overtly romantic gestures are socially expected. For Decker, the essence of queerplatonic attraction is its ambiguous position in relation to normative categories: she writes that QPR "is a platonic relationship, but it is 'queered' in some way—not friends, not romantic partners, but something else ".[4]Similarly, CJ DeLuzio Chasin characterises QPR as a "meta-category 'catch-all'" for "non-normative relationships" that are "not romantic relationships but which are also not adequately or properly described by 'friendship'".[5]

Some authors put less stress on the partner-status structure or non-normative character of QPR and focus more on the idea that it represents a stronger emotional connection than conventional friendship. For instance, theCollege of William & Mary's neologism dictionary defines QPR as an "extremely close" relationship that is "beyond friendship" without being romantic,[6]and sex therapistStefani GoerlichinPsychology Todaysimilarly describes QPRs as a "deeper commitment than friendship".[7]

Terminology[edit]

The term "queerplatonic" was coined in 2010 by the writers s. e. cummings and Kaz.[2]

The form ofattractionthat is involved in queerplatonic relationships has been described using the word "alterous".[8][9]Alternatively, other sources have used the word "queerplatonic" to describe a form of attraction as well as a category of relationship.[10][11][12]

In asexual and aromantic online spaces, queerplatonic partners are sometimes called "zucchinis".[3][13]LGBT news websitePinkNewsdescribes this as "a joke which refers to the lack of terminology to describe meaningful relationships outside of romantic or sexual partnerships".[14]A platoniccrushis called a "squish",[15][16]and this term has been applied to QPR.[17]

Origins and use[edit]

The term originates in the aromantic and asexual communities,[2][6][13]and it was largely restricted to these spaces in the 2010s.The Huffington Postdescribed it in 2014 as a "new label" coming from the same place as "aromantic"and"demisexual",[18]the College of William & Mary's neologism dictionary observed in 2016 that it was only used in aromantic and asexual spaces,[6]and Zach Schudson and Sari van Anders characterised it in 2019 as one of several "emergent gender and sexual identity discourses" appearing on LGBT social networking sites.[19]

However, from 2021, some popular websites aimed at general audiences began to discuss the concept,[7][20][21][22][23]and the concept has been used (rather than merely discussed as a neologism) in some academic art and literature criticism.[24][25][26]

Some authors observed in the 2020s that QPR is associated withpolyamory.A 2021 qualitative analysis of the language used by people involved in polyamory gave the word "queerplatonic" as a typical example of the "complex" vocabulary often used by individuals involved in consensual non-monogamous relationships.[27]Y. Gavriel Ansara, writing for an audience ofrelationship counsellors,also observes that the term is common among polyamorous people.[28]A 2022 article in the women's magazineBustledrew parallels between "queerplatonic life partnerships" and consensual non-monogamy, relating both torelationship anarchyand the shared principle that the participants "customize their commitments according to what the people in the relationship desire".[23]

Schudson and van Anders (2019) and the 2022Bustlearticle also assert that use of the term is driven by "young people",[19]ormillennialsandGeneration Z.[23]

Sex therapistStefani Goerlichsuggested in 2021 that the concept was inspired byBoston marriages—formalizedromantic friendshipsbetween wealthy women in late nineteenth centuryNew England.She also characterized QPRs as "an ancient practice made popular again", and suggests thatRuth and Naomiin theHebrew Biblemight have had "one of the earliest recorded QPRs".[7]

Social analysis[edit]

Savie Luce challenges the conventional queer reading ofMary Eleanor Wilkins Freeman'sTwo Friends,a story depicting a Boston marriage, which casts it in a "sexualized queer light" as depicting a sapphic relationship. She argues that through the lens of QPR and Ela Przybylo's concept of "asexual erotics", Freeman's protagonists can be read as erotic lesbian partners without the need to mischaracterise their relationship as sexual or romantic, which Luce regards as "erotonormative". She also presents QPR as a radical counter-narrative to thelesbian bed deathtrope, with asexuality "an additive quality rather than a deficit" in a queerplatonic partnership between women.[26]

Some authors have seen the concept of QPR as a reaction against anamatonormativehierarchy in which romantic relationships are regarded as more important than friendships. The author of the William & Mary neologism dictionary's entry on QPR opines that the desire to designate a close platonic attachment as a significant other rather than a best friend only exists because of the normative expectation that an individual should prioritize their partner over their friends—for them, QPR is only distinguished from friendship because the latter is not "considered a valid replacement for romantic love".[6]

Similarly, Roma De las Heras Gómez connectsrelationship anarchy's critique of the idea that a romantic relationship is necessary to "create a family that includes long-term partnership, cohabitation, joint economic responsibility, and potential child raising" to the folk categories used in "asexual communities and aromantic communities online", and though she does not directly mention QPR, she does use the phrase "queerplatonic relationships" as a keyword for the paper,[29]suggesting that she sees QPR as similar to relationship-anarchist non-sexual cohabitation and co-parenting.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Some more exact definitions of QPR include:
    • CJ DeLuzio Chasin refers to QPR as a "meta-category 'catch-all'" for "non-normative relationships" that are "not romantic... but which are also not adequately or properly described by 'friendship'".
    • TheCollege of William & Mary's neologism dictionary defines QPR as an "extremely close" relationship that is "beyond friendship" without being romantic.
    See the section "Definition"below.
  2. ^abcdChen, Angela (2021).Ace: What Asexuality Reveals About Desire, Society, and the Meaning of Sex.Beacon Press. pp. 118–121.ISBN978-0-8070-1473-8.OCLC1337835879.
  3. ^abChasin, CJ DeLuzio (2015). "Making Sense in and of the Asexual Community: Navigating Relationships and Identities in a Context of Resistance".Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.25(2): 167–180.doi:10.1002/casp.2203.
  4. ^Decker, Julie Sondra (September 2014).The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality.Skyhorse. p. 25.ISBN978-1634502436.
  5. ^Chasin, CJ DeLuzio (2019)."Asexuality and the Re/Construction of Sexual Orientation"(PDF).In Simula, Brandy L.; Sumerau, J. E.; Miller, Andrea (eds.).Expanding the Rainbow: Exploring the Relationships of Bi+, Polyamorous, Kinky, Ace, Intersex, and Trans People.Leiden: Brill. pp. 209–219.ISBN9789004414099.
  6. ^abcd"Queerplatonic".21st-Century Interdisciplinary Dictionary: A William & Mary Lexicon of English Neologisms, Buzzwords, Keywords and Jargon.Retrieved25 February2022.
  7. ^abcGoerlich, Stefani (6 September 2021)."Queerplatonic Relationships: A New Term for an Old Custom".Psychology Today.Retrieved25 February2022.
  8. ^Gardiner, Georgi (2023)."We Forge the Conditions of Love".academic.oup.pp. 279–314.doi:10.1093/oso/9780192845450.003.0012.ISBN978-0-19-284545-0.Retrieved18 May2024.
  9. ^Young, Eris (21 December 2022).Ace Voices: What it Means to Be Asexual, Aromantic, Demi or Grey-Ace.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1-78775-699-1.
  10. ^"A Guide to 14 Different Types of Attraction".Choosing Therapy.Retrieved18 May2024.
  11. ^Barron, Victoria (21 June 2023).Amazing Ace, Awesome Aro: An Illustrated Exploration.Jessica Kingsley Publishers.ISBN978-1-83997-715-2.
  12. ^Aral, Nigiel; Castro, Maxene Alexandra De; Mansukhani, Karuna May; Sara, Ayeesha Heather (29 April 2021)."Determinants of Sexual Literacy of Senior High School Students in De La Salle University-Manila".DLSU Senior High School Research Congress.
  13. ^ab"The 'A' in LGBT".Counterpoint.35(1): 8. September 2013.
  14. ^Smith, Lydia (18 April 2018)."What is a quasiplatonic aka queerplatonic relationship?".PinkNews.Retrieved26 February2022.
  15. ^"Who's Your Main Squish? 15 Signs You're Squishing on Someone".LovePanky - Your Guide to Better Love and Relationships.22 May 2017.Retrieved28 March2022.
  16. ^"Squish- That Platonic Crush You Always Experienced But Never Had A Name For".ED Times | Youth Media Channel.29 July 2016.Retrieved28 March2022.
  17. ^Omnes et Nihil (2014).Queerplatonic Zucchinis: A Short Primer [zine](PDF).
  18. ^Brekke, Kira (8 October 2014)."This Is What It Means To Be Aromantic, Demiromantic And Queerplatonic".The Huffington Post.Retrieved26 February2022.
  19. ^abvan Anders, Sari; Schudson, Zach (12 August 2019)."'You have to coin new things': Sexual and gender identity discourses in asexual, queer, and/or trans young people's networked counterpublics ".Psychology & Sexuality.10(4): 354–368.doi:10.1080/19419899.2019.1653957.hdl:1974/32792.S2CID202286008.Retrieved26 February2022.
  20. ^"What Does A Queerplatonic Relationship Look Like?".DriveThru.11 June 2021.Retrieved25 February2022.
  21. ^Davenport, Barrie (November 2021)."Are You In A Queerplatonic Relationship? 13 Clues You Are".Live Bold & Bloom.Retrieved26 February2022.
  22. ^"Queerplatonic Relationship: What It Is & 25 Signs You're In One".LovePanky: Your Guide to Better Love and Relationships.12 June 2021.Retrieved26 February2022.
  23. ^abcInks, Lexi."Your Guide To Queerplatonic Life Partnerships".Bustle.Retrieved26 February2022.
  24. ^Popova, Milena (3 April 2018)."'Dogfuck rapeworld': Omegaverse fanfiction as a critical tool in analyzing the impact of social power structures on intimate relationships and sexual consent ".Porn Studies.5(2): 201.doi:10.1080/23268743.2017.1394215.Retrieved25 February2022.
  25. ^Przybyło, Ela (2022). "Ace and aro lesbian art and theory with Agnes Martin and Yayoi Kusama".Journal of Lesbian Studies.26(1): 89–112.doi:10.1080/10894160.2021.1958732.PMID34463602.S2CID239671332.
  26. ^abLuce, Savie (2021)."Asexual Erasure Undone: A Short Literary History of Asexuality in 19th-to 20th-Century Literary Classics".
  27. ^Cardoso, Daniel; Pascoal, Patricia M.; Maiochi, Francisco Hertel (27 May 2021)."Defining Polyamory: A Thematic Analysis of Lay People's Definitions"(PDF).Archives of Sexual Behavior.50(4): 1239–1252.doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02002-y.PMC8321986.PMID34046765.Retrieved25 February2022.
  28. ^Ansara, Y. Gavriel (2020)."Challenging everyday monogamism: Making the paradigm shift from couple-centric bias to polycule-centred practice in counselling and psychotherapy".Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia.8(2).doi:10.59158/001c.71237.S2CID257705886.Retrieved25 February2022.
  29. ^De las Heras Gómez, Roma (2019)."Thinking Relationship Anarchy from a Queer Feminist Approach"(PDF).Sociological Research Online.24(4): 12.doi:10.1177/1360780418811965.S2CID150062238.

Further reading[edit]

  • Linder, Katie (2019). "Queering the Nuclear Family: Navigating Familial Living as an Asexual". In Simula, Brandy L.; Sumerau, J. E.; Miller, Andrea (eds.).Expanding the Rainbow: Exploring the Relationships of Bi+, Polyamorous, Kinky, Ace, Intersex, and Trans People.Leiden: Brill. pp. 221–227.ISBN9789004414099.
  • Strait, Ashton (15 November 2012)."Beyond BFFs: Cozying up to queerplatonic relationships".Post-.Vol. 14, no. 8. Brown University. p. 3.