Jump to content

Redundancy (linguistics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inlinguistics,aredundancyisinformationthat is expressed more than once.[1][2]

Examples of redundancies include multipleagreementfeatures inmorphology,[1]multiple features distinguishingphonemesinphonology,[2]or the use of multiple words to express a single idea inrhetoric.[1]

Grammar[edit]

Redundancy may occur at any level ofgrammar.Because ofagreement– a requirement in many languages that the form of different words in a phrase or clause correspond with one another – the samesemantic informationmay be expressed several times. In theSpanishphraselos árboles verdes( "the green trees" ), for example, thearticlelos,thenounárboles,and theadjectiveverdesare allinflectedto show that the phrase isplural.[1]An English example would be:that man is a soldierversusthose men are soldiers.

In phonology, aminimal pairis a pair of words or phrases that differs by only one phoneme, the smallest distinctive unit of the sound system. Even so, phonemes may differ on severalphonetic features.For example, the English phonemes/p/and/b/in the wordspinandbinfeature differentvoicing,aspiration,andmuscular tension.Any one of these features is sufficient to differentiate/p/from/b/in English.[2]

Generative grammaruses such redundancy to simplify the form of grammatical description. Any feature that can be predicted on the basis of other features (such as aspiration on the basis of voicing) need not be indicated in the grammatical rule. Features that are not redundant and therefore must be indicated by rule are calleddistinctive features.[2]

As withagreementin morphology, phonologically conditionedalternation,such ascoarticulationandassimilation,add redundancy on the phonological level. The redundancy of phonological rules may clarify some vagueness inspoken communication.According to psychologistSteven Pinker,"In the comprehension of speech, the redundancy conferred by phonological rules can compensate for some of the ambiguity of the sound wave. For example, a speaker may know thatthisripmust bethis ripand notthe sripbecause in English the initialconsonant clustersris illegal. "[3]

Redundancy versus repetition[edit]

Writing guides, especially fortechnical writing,usually advise avoiding redundancy, "especially the use of two expressions that mean the same thing. Such repetition works against readability and conciseness."[4]Others make a distinction between redundancy and repetition:

Repetition, if used well, can be a good tool to use in your writing. It can add emphasis to what you are trying to say and strengthen a point. There are many types of useful repetition. Redundancy, on the other hand, cannot be a good thing. Redundancy happens when the repetition of a word or idea does not add anything to the previous usage; it just restates what has already been said, takes up space, and gets in the way without adding meaning.[5]

Computer scientistDonald E. Knuth,author of highly acclaimed textbooks, recommends "to state things twice, in complementary ways, especially when giving a definition. This reinforces the reader's understanding."[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^abcdBussmann, Hadumod (2006).Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics.Routledge. pp. 399–400.ISBN978-1-134-63038-7.
  2. ^abcdCrystal, David (2009).Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics.John Wiley & Sons. pp. 406–407.ISBN978-1-4443-0278-3.
  3. ^Pinker, Steven (1994).The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language.William Morrow. p. 181.ISBN0-688-12141-1.
  4. ^J. H. Dawson, "Avoid Redundancy in Writing", in the column "Helpful Hints for Technical Writing", Weed Technology 6:782 (1992).
  5. ^Nick Jobe and Sophia Stevens: "Repetition and Redundancy", April 2009
  6. ^Donald E. Knuth, Tracy Larrabee, and Paul M. Roberts: "Mathematical Writing" (1987)