Jump to content

Exilarch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromResh galuta)
An exhibit depicting ExilarchHunaat theBeit Hatfutsot

Theexilarch[a]was the leader of theJewish communityin PersianMesopotamia(modern-dayIraq) during the era of theParthians,SasaniansandAbbasid Caliphateup until theMongol invasion of Baghdadin 1258, with intermittent gaps due to ongoing political developments. The exilarch was regarded by the Jewish community as the royal heir of theHouse of Davidand held a place of prominence as both a rabbinical authority and as a noble within the Persian court.

Within theSasanian Empire,the exilarch was the political equivalent of theCatholicosof theChristian Church of the East,and was thus responsible for community-specific organizational tasks such as running therabbinical courts,collecting taxes from Jewish communities, supervising and providing financing for theTalmudic academies in Babylonia,and the charitable re-distribution and financial assistance to needy members of the exile community. The position of exilarch was hereditary, held in continuity by a family that traced its patrilineal descent from antiquity stemming from kingDavid.[1][2][3]

The first historical documents referring to it date from the time whenBabyloniawas part of the lateParthian Empire.The office first appears during the 2nd century and continues to the middle of the 6th century, under different Persian dynasties (the Parthians and Sassanids). In the late 5th and early 6th centuries,Mar-Zutra IIbriefly formed a politically independent state where he ruled fromMahozafor about seven years. He was eventually defeated byKavadh I,King of Persia and the office of the exilarch was diminished for sometime thereafter.[4]The position was restored to prominence in the 7th century, under the rule of the Arab Caliphate, and the office of exilarch continued to be appointed by Arab authorities through the 11th century.

The exilarch's authority came under considerable challenge in 825 during the reign ofal-Ma'munwho issued a decree permitting a group of ten men from any religious community to organize separately, which allowed theGaonof the Talmudic academies ofSuraandPumbeditato compete with the exilarch for power and influence, later contributing to the wider schism betweenKaraitesandRabbinic Jewry.

Title

[edit]

The wordexilarchis aGreco-Latincalqueof theHebrewRosh HaGola(ראש הגולה), literally meaning 'head of the exile'.[5]The position was similarly called inAramaic(ריש גלותאReysh GalutaorResh Galvata) andArabic(رأس الجالوتRaas al-Galut.It was translated intoPersianasسر جالوت.[6]The Jewish people in exile were referred to asgolah(Jeremiah 28:6,29:1) orgalut(Jeremiah 29:22). The contemporary[7]Greek term that was used wasAechmalotarches(Αἰχμαλωτάρχης), literally meaning the 'leader of the captives'. This Greek term has continued to be applied to the office, notwithstanding changes to the position over time, which were largely titular.

Development and organization

[edit]

Although there is no mention about the office before the 2nd century, theSeder Olam Zuttaalleges that the office of exilarch was established following the deportation of KingJeconiahand his court intoexile in Babylonafter thefirst fall of Jerusalem in 597 BCand augmented after the further deportations following thedestruction of the kingdom of Judahin 587. The history of the Babylonian exilarchate falls into two separate identifiable periods, before and after the beginning of the Arabic rule inBabylonia.Nothing is known about the office before the 2nd century, when it is first referenced in the Talmud, including any details about its origins. It can merely be said in general that thegolah(diaspora in Hebrew), the Jews living in compact masses in various parts of Babylon, tended gradually to unite and create an organization, and that this tendency, together with the high regard in which the descendants of the house of David living in Babylon were held, brought it about that a member of this house was recognized as "head of thegolah."The dignity became hereditary in this house, and was finally recognized by the state, and hence became an established political institution, first of theArsacidand then of theSassanidempire.

Such was the exilarchate as it appears inTalmudicliterature, the chief source for its history during the first period, and which provides our only information regarding the rights and functions of the exilarchate. For the second or Arabic period, there is a very important and trustworthy description of the institution of the exilarchate (See the sectionsInstallation ceremoniesandIncome and privileges); this description is also important for the first period, because many of the details may be regarded as having persisted from it.

In Baghdad the privilege of using seals was limited to the exilarch andgeonim.Serving under the authority of thecaliph,they were extremely powerful as the highest authority for the Jewish people in theCaliphate.The use of seals was not limited to internal matters; their authority was recognized by Muslims as well. Based on the account ofBenjamin of Tudela:[8]

"at the head of them all [the Jews under the Baghdad caliphate] is Daniel the son of Hisdai, who is styled 'Our Lord the Head of the Captivity of all Israel.'... he has been invested with authority over all the congregations of Israel at the hands of the Emir al Muminim, the Lord of Islam."

Holders of the office

[edit]

Biblical exilarchs

[edit]

The following are exilarchs mentioned in theSeder Olam Zutta,most are likely legendary figures and have parallels in the text of1 Chronicles 3:

Rabbinical exilarchs under the Sassanids

[edit]

Probably historical exilarchs listed in theSeder Olam Zuttaor noted by Talmudic authorities:

Rabbinical exilarchs under Arab rule

[edit]

Karaite exilarchs

[edit]

The following is a list ofKaraiteexilarchs beginning in the 8th century, after the end of the tenure of the exilarchDavid I:

History

[edit]

Legendary origins

[edit]

TheSeder Olam Zutastates that the first exilarch wasJehoiachin,the king of Judah who was carried off tocaptivity in Babylonia in 597 BC,wherein he established his residence at the city ofNehardeain Babylonia. This chronicle, which was written about the year 800, presents a legendary origin to the early history of the house of the Babylonian exilarch. The captive king's advancement atEvil-Merodach's court—with which the narrative of theSecond Book of Kingscloses (2 Kings 25:27)—was regarded by the author of theSeder 'Olam Zutaas the origin of the office, and the basis for the exilarch's authority. A list of generations of the descendants of the king is given in the text which closely parallels that names found inI Chronicles3:17et seq.

A commentary to theChronicles[34]dating from the school ofSaadia GaonquotesJudah ibn Kuraishto the effect that thegenealogicallist of the descendants of David was added to the book at the end of the period of theSecond Temple,a view which was shared by the author of the list of Babylonian exilarchs inSeder 'Olam Zuta.This list attempts to bridge the seven hundred-year gap between Jehoiachin and the first exilarch mentioned in written sources, Nahum. It grants some specific hallmarks chronologically connecting personalities with the history of the Second Temple, such asShechaniah,who is being mentioned as having lived at the time of the Temple's destruction. The following are enumerated as his predecessors in office:Salathiel,Zerubbabel,Meshullam,Hananiah,Berechiah,Hasadiah,Jesaiah,Obadiah,andShemaiah,Shecaniah,andHezekiah.All of these names are also found in I Chron. 3.,[35]albeit in a confabulated order. This list cannot be historical given the limited number of generations presented.[36]The nameAkkubis also found at the end of the Davidic list in theSeder Olam Zuta,which is followed byNahum,with whom the historic portion of the list begins, and who maybe roughly assigned to the time of thedestruction of Jerusalem(135). This is the period in which are found the first allusions in rabbinical literature to the office of the exilarch.

First allusions in the Jerusalem Talmud

[edit]

In the account referring to the attempt of a teacher ofthe Lawfrom the land of Israel, Hananiah, nephew ofJoshua ben Hananiah,to render the Babylonian Jews independent of theSanhedrin,the religious and political authority residing in the land of Judea, a man named 'Ahijah' is mentioned as the temporal head of the Babylonian Jews, possibly, one of the first historic exilarchs.[37]Another rabbinical source substitutes the nameNehunyonforAhijah.[38]It is likely that this 'Nehunyon' is identical with theNahummentioned in the list.[39]The political danger threatening theSanhedrineventually passed. At about this same time, Rabbi Nathan, a member of the house of exilarch, came to Galilee, where theSanhedrinmet, and where theNasiresided following the Jewish expulsion from Jerusalem. By virtue of his rabbinical scholarship, he was soon classed among the foremosttannaimof the post-Hadrianic epoch. His supposed Davidic genealogical origins suggested to Rabbi Meïr the plan of making the Babylonian scholarnasi(prince) in place of the HilleliteSimon ben Gamaliel.However, the conspiracy against the reigning Nasi failed.[40]Rabbi Nathan was subsequently among the confidants of the Hillelite patriarchal house, and the teacher of Simon ben Gamaliel's son, Judah I (also known asJudah haNasi).

Rabbi Meïr's attempt, however, seems to have led Judah I to fear that the Babylonian exilarch might come to Judea to claim the office fromHillel the Elder's descendant. He discussed the subject with the Babylonian scholar Hiyya, a prominent member of his school,[41]saying that he would pay due honor to the exilarch should the latter come, but that he would not renounce the office ofnasiin his favor.[42]When the body of the exilarchHuna,who was the first incumbent of that office explicitly mentioned as such in Talmudic literature, was brought to Judea during the time of Judah I, Hiyya drew upon himself Judah's deep resentment by announcing the fact to him with the words "Huna is here".[43]Atannaiticexposition ofGenesis49:10[44]which contrasts the Babylonian exilarchs, ruling by force, with Hillel's descendants, teaching in public, evidently intends to cast a negative reflection on the former. However, Judah I had to listen at his own table to the statement of the youthful sons of the aforementioned Hiyya, in reference to the same tannaitic exposition, that "theMessiahcan not appear until the exilarchate at Babylon and the patriarchate atJerusalemshall have ceased ".[45]

Succession of exilarchs

[edit]

According to theSeder 'Olam ZutaNahum was followed by his brotherJohanan,both of whom are called sons ofAkkubin the text. Johanan's sonShaphatis listed next, who was succeeded byAnan,his son. Given the chronological similarities, the identification of the exilarch Anan with the Huna of the Talmud account is very likely. At the time of Anan's successorNathan Ukban I,according to theSeder Olam Zuta,occurred the fall of theParthian Empireand the founding of the Sassanid dynasty in AD 226, which is noted as follows in Seder 'Olam Zuta: "In the year 166 after the destruction of the Temple (c. AD 234) the Persian Empire advanced upon the Romans" (on the historical value of this statement.[46]Nathan 'Ukban, also known asMar 'Ukban,was the contemporary of Rav and Samuel, who also occupied a prominent position among the scholars of Babylon'[47]and, according toSherira Gaon,[48]was also exilarch. As 'Ukban's successor is mentioned in the list his son (Huna II), whose chief advisers were Rav (died 247) and Samuel (died 254), and in whose timePapa ben NazordestroyedNehardea.Huna's son and successor,Nathan,whose chief advisers were Judah ben Ezekiel (died 299) and Shesheth, was called, like his grandfather, "Mar 'Ukban",and it is he, the second exilarch of this name, whose curious correspondence withEleazar ben Pedatis referred to in the Talmud.[49]He was succeeded by his brother (not his son, as stated in Seder 'Olam Zuta); his leading adviser wasShezbi.The "exilarchNehemiah"is also mentioned in the Talmud;[50]he is the same person as "Rabbanu Nehemiah," and he and his brother "Rabbeinu 'Ukban" (Mar Ukban II) are several times mentioned in the Talmud as sons of Rav's daughter (hence Huna II was Rav's son-in-law) and members of the house of the exilarchs.[51]

The Mar Ukbans

[edit]

According toSeder 'Olam Zuta,in Nehemiah's time, the 245th year after the destruction of the Temple (313 CE), there took place a great religious persecution by the Persians, of which, however, no details are known. Nehemiah was succeeded by his sonMar 'Ukban III,whose chief advisers were Rabbah ben Nahmani (died 323) and Adda. He is mentioned as "'Ukban ben Nehemiah, resh galuta," in the Talmud.[52]This Mar 'Ukban, the third exilarch of that name, was also called "Nathan," as were the first two, and has been made the hero of a legend under the name of "Nathan de-Ẓuẓita".[53]The conquest ofArmenia(337) byShapur (Sapor) IIis mentioned in the chronicle as a historical event occurring during the time of Nathan Ukban III.

He was succeeded by his brother Huna Mar (Huna III), whose chief advisers were Abaye (died 338) and Raba; then followed Mar Ukban's sonAbba,whose chief advisers were Raba (died 352) and Rabina. During Abba's time King Sapor conqueredNisibis.The designation of a certain Isaac asresh galutain the time of Abaye and Raba[54]is due to a clerical error [Brüll'sJahrbuch,vii. 115], and is therefore omitted from lists. Abba was succeeded first by his son Nathan and then by another son,Kahana I.The latter's sonHunais then mentioned as successor, being the fourth exilarch of that name; he died in 441, according to a trustworthy source, the "Seder Tannaim wa-Amoraim." Hence he was a contemporary ofRav Ashi,the great master ofSura,who died in 427. In the Talmud, however, Huna ben Nathan is mentioned as Ashi's contemporary, and according to Sherira it was he who was Mar Kahana's successor, a statement which is also confirmed by the Talmud.[55]The statement of Seder Olam Zuta ought perhaps to be emended, since Huna was probably not the son of Mar Kahana, but the son of the latter's elder brother Nathan.

Persecutions under Peroz and Kobad

[edit]

Huna was succeeded by his brotherMar Zutra,whose chief adviser was Ahai of Diphti, the same who was defeated in 455 by Ashi's sonTabyomi(Mar) at the election for director of the school of Sura. Mar Zutra was succeeded by his son Kahana (Kahana II), whose chief adviser was Rabina, the editor of the Babylonian Talmud (died 499). Then followed two exilarchs by the same name: another son of Mar Zutra,Huna V,and a grandson of Mar Zutra,Huna VI,the son of Kahana.

Huna V fell a victim to the persecutions under KingPeroz (Firuz) of Persia,being executed, according to Sherira, in 470; Huna VI was not installed in office until some time later, the exilarchate being vacant during the persecutions under Peroz; he died in 508 [Sherira]. TheSeder 'Olam Zutaconnects with the birth of his sonMar Zutrathe legend that is elsewhere told in connection withBostanai's birth.

Mar Zutra II,who came into office at the age of fifteen, took advantage of the confusion into whichMazdak's communistic attempts had plunged Persia, to obtain by force of arms for a short time a sort of political independence for the Jews of Babylon. KingKobad,however, punished him by crucifying him on the bridge ofMahuza(c. 502). A son was born to him on the day of his death, who was also named "Mar Zutra."The latter did not attain to the office of exilarch, but went to the land of Israel, where he became head of theAcademy of Tiberias,under the title of "Resh Pirka" ('Aρχιφεκίτησ), several generations of his descendants succeeding him in this office.

After Mar Zutra's death the exilarchate of Babylon remained unoccupied for some time.[56]Mar Ahunailived in the period succeeding Mar Zutra II, but for almost fifty years after the catastrophe he did not dare to appear in public, and it is not known whether even then (c. 550) he really acted as exilarch. At any rate the chain of succession of those who inherited the office was not broken. The names ofKafnaiand his sonHaninai,who were exilarchs in the second half of the 6th, have been preserved.

Haninai's posthumous son Bostanai was the first of the exilarchs under Arabic rule. Bostanai was the ancestor of the exilarchs who were in office from the time when the Persian empire was conquered by the Arabs, in 642, down to the 11th century. Through him, the splendor of the office was renewed and its political position made secure. His tomb inPumbeditawas a place of worship as late as the 12th century, according toBenjamin of Tudela.

Not much is known regarding Bostanai's successors down to the time of Saadia except their names; even the name of Bostanai's son is not known. The list of the exilarchs down to the end of the 9th century is given as follows in an old document:[57]"Bostanai,Hanina ben Adoi,Hasdai I,Solomon,Isaac Iskawi I,Judah Zakkai(Babawai),Moses,Isaac Iskawi II,David ben Judah,Hasdai II."

Hasdai I was probably Bostanai's grandson. The latter's son Solomon had a deciding voice in the appointments to the gaonate of Sura in the years 733 and 759 [Sherira]. Isaac Iskawi I died very soon after Solomon. In the dispute between David's sons Anan and Hananiah regarding the succession the latter was victor; Anan then proclaimed himself anti-exilarch, was imprisoned, and founded the etc. of theKaraites.So says theJewish Encyclopediaof 1906; the origin of the Karaites is not uncontroversial. His descendants were regarded by the Karaites as the true exilarchs. The following list of Karaite exilarchs, father being succeeded always by son, is given in the genealogy of one of these "Karaite princes":Anan,Saul,Josiah,Boaz,Jehoshaphat,David,Solomon,Hezekiah,Hasdai,Solomon II.[58]Anan's brother Hananiah is not mentioned in this list.

Judah Zakkai, who is called "Zakkai ben Ahunai" by Sherira, had as rival candidate Natronai ben Habibai, who, however, was defeated and sent West in banishment; this Natronai was a great scholar, and, according to tradition, while inSpainwrote the Talmud from memory. David ben Judah also had to contend with an anti-exilarch, Daniel by name. The fact that the decision in this dispute rested with the calif Al-Ma'mun (825) indicates a decline in the power of the exilarchate. David ben Judah, who carried off the victory, appointed Isaac ben Hiyya as Gaon at Pumbedita in 833. PrecedingHasdai II's name in the list that of his fatherNatronaimust be inserted. Both are designated as exilarchs in a geonic responsum.[59]

Deposition of 'Ukba

[edit]

Ukban IVis mentioned as exilarch immediately following the death ofHasdai II;he was deposed at the instigation of Kohen-Zedek,Gaon of Pumbedita,but was reinstated in 918 on account of some Arabic verses with which he greeted the caliphal-Muqtadir.He was deposed again soon afterwards, and fled to Kairwan, where he was treated with great honor by the Jewish community there.

'Ukba's nephew,David II,became exilarch; but he had to contend for nearly two years with Kohen-Zedek before he was finally confirmed in his power (921). In consequence of Saadia's call to the gaonate of Sura and his controversy with David, the latter has become one of the best-known personages of Jewish history. Saadia had David's brother Josiah (Al-Hasan) elected anti-exilarch in 930, but the latter was defeated and banished toChorasan.David ben Zakkai was the last exilarch to play an important part in history. He died a few years before Saadia; his son Judah died seven months afterward.

Judah left a son (whose name is not mentioned) twelve years of age, whom Saadia took into his house and educated. His generous treatment of the grandson of his former adversary was continued until Saadia's death in 942.

Diminished power of the Babylonian exilarchate

[edit]

WhenGaon Haidied in 1038, nearly a century after Saadia's death, the members of his academy could not find a more worthy successor than the exilarchHezekiah,a great-grandson of David ben Zakkai, who thereafter filled both offices. But two years later, in 1040, Hezekiah, who was the last exilarch and also the last Gaon, fell a victim to calumny by a peer. He was imprisoned and tortured to death. Two of his sons fled to Spain, where they found refuge with Joseph, the son and successor ofSamuel ha-Nagid.Alternatively,Jewish Quarterly Reviewmentions that Hezekiah was liberated from prison, and became head of the academy, and is mentioned as such by a contemporary in 1046.[60]

Later traces

[edit]

The title of exilarch is found occasionally even after the Babylonian exilarchate had ceased. Abraham ibn Ezra speaks of the "Davidic house" atBaghdad(before 1140), calling its members the "heads of the Exile."[61]Benjamin of Tudelain 1170 mentions the Exilarch Hasdai, among whose pupils was the subsequent pseudo-MessiahDavid Alroy,and Hasdai's son, the Exilarch Daniel. Pethahiah of Regensburg also refers to the latter, but under the name of "Daniel ben Solomon"; hence it must be assumed that Hasdai was also called "Solomon".Yehuda Alharizi(after 1216) met atMosula descendant of the house of David, whom he calls "David, the head of the Exile."

A long time previously a descendant of the ancient house of exilarchs had attempted to revive inFatimidEgyptthe dignity of exilarch which had become extinct in Babylon. This was David ben Daniel; he came to Egypt at the age of twenty, in 1081, and was proclaimed exilarch by the learned Jewish authorities of that country, who wished to divert to Egypt the leadership formerly enjoyed by Babylon. A contemporary document, the Megillah of thegaonAbiathar from the land of Israel, gives an authentic account of this episode of the Egyptian Exilarchate, which ended with the downfall of David ben Daniel in 1094.[62]

Descendants of the house of exilarchs were living in various places long after the office became extinct. A descendant of Hezekiah,Hiyya al-Daudi,Gaon of Andalucia, died in 1154 inCastileaccording to Abraham ibn Daud. Several families, as late as the 14th century, traced their descent back to Josiah, the brother of David ben Zakkai who had been banished to Chorasan (see the genealogies in.[63]The descendants of the Karaite exilarchs have been referred to above.

Character of the exilarchate before Arab expansion

[edit]

Relations with the Academies

[edit]

In accordance with the character of Talmudic tradition, it is the relation of the exilarchs to the heads and members of the schools that is especially referred to in Talmudic literature. TheSeder 'Olam Zuta,the chronicle of the exilarchs that is the most important and in many cases the only source of information concerning their succession, has also preserved chiefly the names of those scholars who had certain official relations with the respective exilarchs. The phrase used in this connection ("hakamim debaruhu","the scholars directed him" ) is the stereotyped phrase used also in connection with the fictitious exilarchs of the century of the Second Temple; in the latter case, however, it occurs without the specific mention of names—a fact in favor of the historicalness of those names that are given for the succeeding centuries.

The authenticity of the names of theamoraimdesignated as the scholars "guiding" the several exilarchs, is, in the case of those passages in which the text is beyond dispute, supported by internal chronological evidence also. Some of the Babylonianamoraimwere closely related to the house of the exilarchs, as, for example, Rabba ben Abuha, whom Gaon Sherira, claiming Davidian descent, named as his ancestor. Nahman ben Jacob (died 320) also became closely connected with the house of the exilarchs through his marriage with Rabba ben Abuha's daughter, the proud Yaltha; and he owed to this connection perhaps his office of chief judge of the Babylonian Jews. Huna, the head of the school of Sura, recognized Nahman ben Jacob's superior knowledge of the Law by saying that Nahman was very close to the "gate of the exilarch" ("baba di resh galuta"), where many cases were decided.[64]

The term"dayyanei di baba"( "judges of the gate" ), which was applied in the post-Talmudic time to the members of the court of the exilarch, is derived from the phrase just quoted.[65]Two details of Nahman ben Jacob's life cast light on his position at the court of the exilarch: he received the two scholarsRav Chisdaand Rabba b. Huna, who had come to pay their respects to the exilarch;[66]and when the exilarch was building a new house he asked Nahman to take charge of the placing of themezuzahaccording to the Law.[67]

Behavior

[edit]

The scholars who formed part of the retinue of the exilarch were called "scholars of the house of the exilarch" ("rabbanan di-be resh galuta"). A remark ofSamuel,the head of the school ofNehardea,shows that they wore certain badges on their garments to indicate their position.[68]Once a woman came toNahman ben Jacob,complaining that the exilarch and the scholars of his court sat at the festival in a stolen booth,[69]the material for it having been taken from her. There are many anecdotes of the annoyances and indignities the scholars had to suffer at the hands of the exilarchs' servants, such as the case of Amram the Pious,[70]of Hiyya of Parwa,[71]and of Abba ben Marta.[72]The modification of ritual requirements granted to the exilarchs and their households in certain concrete cases is characteristic of their relation to the religious law.[73]Once when certain preparations which the exilarch was making in his park for alleviating the strictness of theSabbathlaw were interrupted by Raba and his pupils, he exclaimed, in the words ofJeremiah 4:22,"They are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge".[74]There are frequent references to questions, partly halakhic and exegetical in nature, which the exilarch laid before his scholars.[75]Details are sometimes given of lectures that were delivered "at the entrance to the house of the exilarch"[76]These lectures were probably delivered at the time of the assemblies, which brought many representatives of Babylonian Judaism to the court of the exilarch after the autumnal festivals.[77]

Etiquette of the Resh Galuta's court

[edit]

The luxurious banquets at the court of the exilarch were well known. An old anecdote was repeated in the land of Israel concerning a splendid feast which the exilarch once gave to the tannaJudah ben Bathyraat Nisibis on the eve ofTisha Beav.[78]though in the more exactS. Buber's edition, the feast was given by the chief of the synagogue. Another story told in the land of Israel relates that an exilarch had music in his house morning and evening, and that Mar 'Ukba, who subsequently became exilarch, sent him as a warning this verse fromHosea:"Rejoice not, O Israel, for joy, as other people."[79]

The exilarch Nehemiah is said to have dressed entirely in silk.[80]The Talmud says almost nothing in regard to the personal relations of the exilarchs to the royal court. One passage relates merely that Huna ben Nathan appeared beforeYazdegerd I,who with his own hands girded him with the belt which was the sign of the exilarch's office. There are also two allusions dating from an earlier time, one by Hiyya, a Babylonian living in the land of Israel,[81]and the other by Adda ben Ahaba, one of Rav's earlier pupils,[82]from which it seems that the exilarch occupied a foremost position among the high dignitaries of the state when he appeared at the court first of the Arsacids, then of the Sassanids.

An Arabic writer of the 9th century records the fact that the exilarch presented a gift of 4,000dirhemson the Persian feast ofNauruz.[83]Regarding the functions of the exilarch as the chieftax-collector for the Jewish population, there is the curious statement, preserved only in the Jerusalem Talmud,[84]that once, in the time of Huna, the head of the school of Sura, the exilarch was commanded to furnish as much grain as would fill a room of 40 squareells.

Juridical functions

[edit]

The most important function of the exilarch was the appointment of the judge. Both Rav and Samuel said[85]that the judge who did not wish to be held personally responsible in case of an error of judgment, would have to accept his appointment from the house of the exilarch. When Rav went from the land of Israel to Nehardea he was appointed overseer of the market by the exilarch.[86]The exilarch had jurisdiction in criminal cases also. Aha b. Jacob, a contemporary of Rav,[87]was commissioned by the exilarch to take charge of a murder case.[88]The story found inBava Kamma 59ais an interesting example of the police jurisdiction exercised by the followers of the exilarch in the time of Samuel. From the same time dates a curious dispute regarding the etiquette of precedence among the scholars greeting the exilarch.[89]The exilarch had certain privileges regarding real property.[90]It is a specially noteworthy fact that in certain cases the exilarch judged according to the Persian law;[91]and it was the exilarch 'Ukba b. Nehemiah who communicated to the head of the school of Pumbedita, Rabbah ben Nahmai, three Persian statutes which Samuel recognized as binding.[92]

Asynagogalprerogative of the exilarch was mentioned in the land of Israel as a curiosity:[93]TheTorahroll was carried to the exilarch, while every one else had to go to the Torah to read from it. This prerogative is referred to also in the account of the installation of the exilarch in the Arabic period, and this gives color to the assumption that the ceremonies, as recounted in this document, were based in part on usages taken over from the Persian time. The account of the installation of the exilarch is supplemented by further details in regard to the exilarchate which are of great historical value;see the following section.

Character of the exilarchate in the Arabic era

[edit]

Upon their conquest ofIraq,theCaliphateconfirmed the authority of exilarch onBustanaison of Haninai, and the continuation of his governance over the Jewish community.[94]For his political services to theArab authoritiesduring the Islamic conquests, he was given the daughter of the former Sassanid Emperor as a slave.[95]Muslim authorities regarded the office of exilarch with profound respect as they viewed its incumbent as a direct descendant of the ancient prophetDavid.The subsequent fragmentation of the authority of the Abbasids resulted in the waning of the authority of the exilarch beyondthe former Abbasid realm.Additionally, the struggle for leadership between theGeonimof the rabbinical academies and exilarchs saw the slow diminishment of centralized power. Rabbinical decentralization favored the Geonim, but remained an office of reverence to whichMuslimauthorities showed respect.[96]

Installation ceremonies

[edit]

The following is a translation of a portion of an account of the exilarchy in the Arabic period, written by Nathan ha-Babli in the early 10th century, and included in Abraham Zacuto's "Yuhasin" and in Neubauer's "Mediaeval Jewish Chronicles,":[97]

The members of the two academies [Sura and Pumbedita], led by the two heads [the geonim] as well as by the leaders of the community, assemble in the house of an especially prominent man before the Sabbath on which the installation of the exilarch is to take place. The first homage is paid on Thursday in the synagogue, the event being announced by trumpets, and every one sends presents to the exilarch according to his means. The leaders of the community and the wealthy send handsome garments, jewelry, and gold and silver vessels. On Thursday and Friday the exilarch gives great banquets. On the morning of the Sabbath the nobles of the community call for him and accompany him to the synagogue. Here a wooden platform covered entirely with costly cloth has been erected, under which a picked choir of sweet-voiced youths well versed in the liturgy has been placed. This choir responds to the leader inprayer,who begins the service with 'Baruk she-amar.' After the morning prayer the exilarch, who until now has been standing in a covered place, appears; the whole congregation rises and remains standing until he has taken his place on the platform, and the two geonim, the one from Sura preceding, have taken seats to his right and left, each making an obeisance.

A costly canopy has been erected over the seat of the exilarch. Then the leader in prayer steps in front of the platform and, in a low voice audible only to those close by, and accompanied by the 'Amen' of the choir, addresses the exilarch with a benediction, prepared long beforehand. Then the exilarch delivers a sermon on the text of the week or commissions thegaonof Sura to do so. After the discourse the leader in prayer recites the kaddish, and when he reaches the words 'during your life and in your days,' he adds the words 'and during the life of our prince, the exilarch.' After the kaddish he blesses the exilarch, the two heads of the schools, and the several provinces that contribute to the support of the academies, as well as the individuals who have been of especial service in this direction. Then the Torah is read. When the 'Kohen' and 'Levi' have finished reading, the leader in prayer carries the Torah roll to the exilarch, the whole congregation rising; the exilarch takes the roll in his hands and reads from it while standing. The two heads of the schools also rise, and thegaonof Sura recites the targum to the passage read by the exilarch. When the reading of the Torah is completed, a blessing is pronounced upon the exilarch. After the 'Musaf' prayer the exilarch leaves the synagogue, and all, singing, accompany him to his house. After that the exilarch rarely goes beyond the gate of his house, where services for the community are held on the Sabbaths and feastdays. When it becomes necessary for him to leave his house, he does so only in a carriage of state, accompanied by a large retinue. If the exilarch desires to pay his respects to the king, he first asks permission to do so. As he enters the palace the king's servants hasten to meet him, among whom he liberally distributes gold coin, for which provision has been made beforehand. When led before the king his seat is assigned to him. The king then asks what he desires. He begins with carefully prepared words of praise and blessing, reminds the king of the customs of his fathers, gains the favor of the king with appropriate words, and receives written consent to his demands; thereupon, rejoiced, he takes leave of the king. "

Income and privileges

[edit]

In regard to Nathan ha-Babli's additional account as to the income and the functions of the exilarch (which refers, however, only to the time of the narrator), it may be noted that he received taxes, amounting altogether to 700 golddenariia year, chiefly from the provincesNahrawan,Farsistan,andHolwan.TheMuslimauthor of the 9th century, Al-Jahiz, who has been referred to above, makes special mention of theshofar,the wind-instrument which was used when the exilarch (ras al-jalut)excommunicatedany one. The punishment ofexcommunicationis the only ecclesiastical power the exilarch of the Jews and theCatholicosof theChristiansmay pronounce, for they are deprived of the right of inflicting punishment byimprisonmentorflogging.[98]

Another Muslim author reports a conversation that took place in the 8th century between a follower of Islam and the exilarch, in which the latter boasted; "Seventy generations have passed between me and King David, yet the Jews still recognize the prerogatives of my royal descent, and regard it as their duty to protect me; but you have slain the grandsonHusainofyour prophetafter one single generation ".[99]The son of a previous exilarch said to yet another Muslim author: "I formerly never rode by Karbala, the place where Husain was martyred, without spurring on my horse, for an old tradition said that on this spot the descendant of a prophet would be killed; only since Husain has been slain there and the prophecy has thus been fulfilled do I pass leisurely by the place".[100]This last story indicates that the exilarch had by the Arab period become the subject of Muslim legend. That the person of the exilarch was familiar to Muslim circles is also shown by the fact that the Rabbinite Jews were calledJaluti,that is, those belonging to the exilarch, in contradistinction to the Karaites. In the first quarter of the 11th century, not long before the extinction of the exilarchate,Ibn Hazmmade the following remark in regard to the dignity: "Theras al-jaluthas no power whatever over the Jews or over other persons; he has merely a title, to which is attached neither authority nor prerogatives of any kind ".[101]

To this day, the exilarchs are still mentioned in the Sabbath services of theAshkenaziritual. The Aramaic prayer "Yekum Purkan",which was used once in Babylon in pronouncing the blessing upon the leaders there, including the" reshe galwata "(the exilarchs), is still recited in most synagogues. The Jews of theSephardicritual have not preserved this anachronism, nor was it retained in most of theReform synagogues.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Hebrew:Rosh HaGola (ראש הגולה, 'head of the exile');Aramaic:(ריש גלותא, Reysh Galuta or Resh Galvata)

References

[edit]

This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domain:Singer, Isidore;et al., eds. (1901–1906)."Exilarch".The Jewish Encyclopedia.New York: Funk & Wagnalls.

  1. ^גרוסמן, אברהם; Grossman, A. (1985). "From Father to Son: The Inheritance of the Spiritual Leadership of the Jewish Communities in the Early Middle Ages / ירושת אבות בהנהגה הרוחנית של קהילות ישראל בימי הביניים המוקדמים".Zion / ציון.נ:189–220.JSTOR23559936.
  2. ^Max A Margolis and Alexander Marx, A History of the Jewish People (1927), p. 235.
  3. ^"The Real Messiah A Jewish Response to Missionaries"(PDF).Archived from the original on May 29, 2008.Retrieved2012-04-17.{{cite web}}:CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  4. ^Joseph Jacobs, Schulim Ochser."ZUṬRA, MAR, II.".Jewish Encyclopedia.
  5. ^Saperstein, Marc (1 March 2013). "Positions of Jewish Leadership: Sources of Authority and Power".European Judaism.46(1): 50–59.doi:10.3167/ej.2013.46.01.07.JSTOR42751117.GaleA337814851.
  6. ^"سازمان فرهنگ و ارتباطات اسلامي - يهوديان".Archived fromthe originalon 2011-10-05.Retrieved2022-11-02.
  7. ^Townley, James.Illustrations of biblical literature, exhibiting the history and fate of the sacred writings, from the earliest period to the present century; including biographical notices of translators and other eminent biblical scholars.{{cite book}}:|website=ignored (help)
  8. ^"Medieval Jewish seals from Europe".Wayne State University Libraries.Retrieved5 September2019.
  9. ^Akhiezer, Golda; Polliack, Meira; Wechsler, Michael G.; David, Greenberg (1 January 2018).Historical Consciousness, Haskalah, and Nationalism among the Karaites of Eastern Europe: Karaite Texts and Studies, Volume 10.doi:10.1163/9789004360587.ISBN978-90-04-36058-7.[page needed]
  10. ^"Ahijah, 1st Exilarch | the House of David".Archived fromthe originalon 2021-07-11.Retrieved2021-08-10.
  11. ^"Ahijah - the 1901 Jewish Encyclopedia".
  12. ^Neusner, Jacob (1963). "Some Aspects of the Economic and Political Life of Babylonian Jewry, Ca. 160-220 C. E.".Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research.31:165–196.doi:10.2307/3622402.JSTOR3622402.
  13. ^"Huna I, 5th Exilarch | the House of David".Archived fromthe originalon 2021-07-19.Retrieved2021-08-11.
  14. ^Horayoth 11b
  15. ^Goode, Alexander D. (1940). "The Exilarchate in the Eastern Caliphate, 637-1258".The Jewish Quarterly Review.31(2): 149–169.doi:10.2307/1452602.JSTOR1452602.
  16. ^Isidore Singer, M. Seligsohn."HUNA (called also Huna the Babylonian)".Jewish Encyclopedia.
  17. ^Recension A. Neubauer, "M. J. C." ii. 71.
  18. ^Shabbat 56b
  19. ^Isidore Singer, M. Seligsohn."HUNA B. NATHAN".Jewish Encyclopedia.
  20. ^Geoffrey Herman (2012).A Prince Without a Kingdom: The Exilarch in the Sasanian Era.Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, German. p. 295.ISBN9783161506062.Retrieved15 January2014.
  21. ^כהן, אבינועם; Cohen, Avinoam (2011). "More on the Question of the Amora Mar Zutra as Exilarch — A Study of Geonic Chronicles / עוד לשאלת כהונת האמורא מר זוטרא כראש גולה: עיון ברשימות היוחסין שמתקופת הגאונים".Sidra: A Journal for the Study of Rabbinic Literature / סידרא: כתב-עת לחקר ספרות התורה שבעל-פה.כו:19–60.JSTOR24174694.
  22. ^Geoffrey Herman (2012).A Prince Without a Kingdom: The Exilarch in the Sasanian Era.Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen, German. p. 295.ISBN9783161506062.Retrieved15 January2014.
  23. ^Jacob Neusner (1975).A history of the Jews in Babylonia v. later Sasanian times.printed in the Netherlands. p. 126.Retrieved15 January2014.
  24. ^Franklin, Arnold (2005). "Cultivating Roots: The Promotion of Exilarchal Ties to David in the Middle Ages".AJS Review.29(1): 91–110.doi:10.1017/S0364009405000048.JSTOR4131810.S2CID162847843.
  25. ^Mescheloff, David (2014). "תקצירים באנגלית / ENGLISH SUMMARIES".Sidra: A Journal for the Study of Rabbinic Literature / סידרא: כתב-עת לחקר ספרות התורה שבעל-פה.כט:V–X.JSTOR24174690.
  26. ^Worman, E. J. (January 1908). "The Exilarch Bustani".The Jewish Quarterly Review.20(2): 211–215.doi:10.2307/1450853.JSTOR1450853.
  27. ^"History of the Jews".Philadelphia, The Jewish Publication Society of America. 1891.
  28. ^Jacob Neusner (1975).A History of the Jews in Babylonia v. Later Sasanian Times.printed in the Netherlands. p. 127.Retrieved15 January2014.
  29. ^"The Exilarch Bustānī".The Jewish Quarterly Review. January 1908.
  30. ^Golb (19 December 2013).Judaeo Arabic Studies.Routledge.ISBN978-1-134-39986-4.
  31. ^David H Kelley (2006)."THE POLITICAL ROLE OF SOLOMON, THE EXILARCH, C.715-759 CE (PART 1)"(PDF).Foundations.2(1): 29–46.
  32. ^Landman, Isaac; Cohen, Simon (1940)."The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia...: An Authoritative and Popular Presentation of Jews and Judaism Since the Earliest Times".
  33. ^Roth, Norman (8 April 2014).Medieval Jewish Civilization: An Encyclopedia.Routledge.ISBN978-1-136-77155-2.
  34. ^Kirchheim 1874, p. 16
  35. ^(compare the list with the variants given in [Lazarus 1890])
  36. ^ליוור, יעקב; Liver, Jacob (1957). "The Problem of the Davidic Family after the Biblical Period / לבעית היוחסין של בית דויד אחרי תקופת המקרא".Tarbiz / תרביץ.כו(ג): 229–254.JSTOR23588716.
  37. ^Berakhot 63a,b
  38. ^Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 19a
  39. ^Lazarus 1890, p. 65
  40. ^Horayot 13b
  41. ^Horayot 11b
  42. ^Kilayim 32b
  43. ^Yerushalmi Kilayim 32b
  44. ^Sanhedrin 5a
  45. ^Sanhedrin 38a
  46. ^see [Lazarus 1890], p. 33)
  47. ^see Bacher, "Aggadoth of the Babylonian Amoraim" pp. 34–36
  48. ^who quotes Talmud Shabbat 55a
  49. ^Gittin 7a; see Bacher, l.c. p. 72;idem,"Aggadoth of the Palestinian Amoraim" i. 9
  50. ^Bava Metzia 91b
  51. ^Hullin 92a; Bava Batra 51b
  52. ^Shabbat 56b; Bava Batra 55a
  53. ^Shabbat 56b
  54. ^Yebamoth 115b
  55. ^Zevachim 19a
  56. ^בר, משה; Beer, M. (1963). "The Exilarchs in Talmudic Times / ראשות הגולה בימי התלמוד".Zion / ציון.כח(א/ב): 3–33.JSTOR23552157.
  57. ^Neubauer, "Mediaeval Jewish Chronicles," i. 196
  58. ^Pinsker, "Likkute Kadmoniyyot," ii. 53
  59. ^Harkavy, "Responsen der Geonim," p. 389
  60. ^Jewish Quarterly Review,hereafter "J. Q. R.", xv. 80
  61. ^Abraham ibn Ezra, commentary to Zechariah 12:7
  62. ^"J. Q. R." xv. 80et. seq.
  63. ^Lazarus 1890, pp. 180 et seq.
  64. ^Bava Batra 65b
  65. ^compareHarkavy,l.c.
  66. ^Sukkah 10b
  67. ^Menachot 33a
  68. ^Shabbat 58a
  69. ^Sukkah 31a
  70. ^Gittin 67b
  71. ^Avodah Zarah 38b
  72. ^Shabbat 121b
  73. ^Pesahim 76b,Levi ben Sisi;Hullin 59a, Rav; Avodah Zarah 72b, Rabba ben Huna; Eruvin 11b, Nahman versus Sheshet; Eruvin 39b, similarly; Mo'ed Katan 12a, Hanan; Pesahim 40b, Pappai
  74. ^Eruvin 26a
  75. ^To Huna, Gittin 7a; Yebamoth 61a; Sanhedrin 44a; to Rabba ben Huna, Shabbat 115b; to Hamnuna, Shabbat 119a
  76. ^"pitha di-be resh galuta";see Hullin 84b; Betzah 23a; Shabbat 126a; Mo'ed Katan 24a
  77. ^On Sabbath Lech Lecha, as Sherira says; compare Eruvin 59a
  78. ^Lamentations Rabbah3:16
  79. ^Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 74b
  80. ^Shabbat 20b, according to the correct reading; see Rabbinowicz, "Dikdukei Soferim"
  81. ^Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot 5a
  82. ^Shevuot 6b; Jerusalem Talmud Shevuot 32d
  83. ^Revue des Études Juives- hereafter R. E. J. - viii. 122
  84. ^Sotah 24a, bottom
  85. ^Sanhedrin 5a
  86. ^Bava Batra 15b
  87. ^compare Gittin 31b
  88. ^Sanhedrin 27a, b
  89. ^Ta'an. 68a
  90. ^Bava Kamma 102b; Bava Batra 36a
  91. ^Bava Kamma 58b
  92. ^Bava Batra 55a
  93. ^Sotah 22a
  94. ^בר, משה; Beer, M. (1969). "ON THE RELIGIOUS — PUBLIC FUNCTIONS OF THE BABYLONIAN EXILARCH / על תפקידים בעלי אופי דתי-צבורי של ראשי הגולה בבבל בימי התלמוד".Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish Studies / דברי הקונגרס העולמי למדעי היהדות.ה:84–86.JSTOR23515471.
  95. ^Metnon, A.F. The Book of Destiny. King David Press, 1996, p. 393
  96. ^Lucien Gubbay, "Sunlight and Shadow: The Jewish Experience of Islam", 2000, Other Press, LLC,ISBN1-892746-69-7pg. 31
  97. ^ii. 83 et seq.
  98. ^"R. E. J." viii. 122et. seq.
  99. ^ibid.p. 125
  100. ^ibid.p. 123
  101. ^ibid.,p. 125
[edit]