Sangam literature
TheSangam literature(Tamil:சங்க இலக்கியம்,caṅka ilakkiyam), historically known as 'the poetry of the noble ones' (Tamil:சான்றோர் செய்யுள்,Cāṉṟōr ceyyuḷ),[1]connotes the early classicalTamil literatureand is the earliest known literature ofSouth India.The Tamil tradition and legends link it tothree legendary literary gatheringsaroundMaduraiand Kapāṭapuram: the first lasted over 4,440 years, the second over 3,700 years, and the third over 1,850 years.[2][3]Scholars consider this Tamil tradition-based chronology as ahistorical and mythical.[4]Most scholars suggest the historical Sangam literature era, also called theSangam period,spanned fromc. 300 BCEto 300 CE,[2][5][6]while others variously place this early classical Tamil literature period a bit later and more narrowly but all before 300 CE.[7][8][9]According toKamil Zvelebil,a Tamil literature and history scholar, the most acceptable range for the Sangam literature is 100 BCE to 250 CE, based on the linguistic, prosodic and quasi-historic allusions within the texts and thecolophons.[10]
The Sangam literature had fallen into oblivion for much of the second millennium of the common era, but were preserved by and rediscovered in themonasteriesofHinduism,nearKumbakonam,by colonial-era scholars in the late nineteenth century.[11][12]The rediscovered Sangam classical collection is largely a bardic corpus. It comprises anUrtextof oldest surviving Tamil grammar (Tolkappiyam), the Ettuttokai anthology (the "Eight Collections" ), the Pathuppaattu anthology (the "Ten Songs" ).[13]The Tamil literature that followed the Sangam period – that is, afterc. 250 CEbut beforec. 600 CE– is generally called the "post-Sangam" literature.[8]
This collection contains 2381 poems inTamilcomposed by 473 poets, some 102 anonymous.[13][14]Of these, 16 poets account for about 50% of the known Sangam literature,[13]withKapilar– the most prolific poet – alone contributing just little less than 10% of the entire corpus.[15]These poems vary between 3 and 782 lines long.[12]The bardic poetry of the Sangam era is largely about love (akam) and war (puram), with the exception of the shorter poems such as inParipaatalwhich is more religious and praiseVishnuandMurugan.[2][16][17]The Sangam literature also includesBuddhistandJainistepics.[citation needed]
Legendary Tamil Sangams
[edit]Sangamliterally means "gathering, meeting, fraternity, academy". According to David Shulman, a scholar of Tamil language and literature, the Tamil tradition believes that the Sangam literature arose in distant antiquity over three periods, each stretching over many millennia.[18]The first has roots in the Hindu deityShiva,his sonMurugan,Kuberaas well as 545 sages including the famedRigvedicpoetAgastya.The first academy, states the legend, extended over four millennia and was located far to the south of modern city of Madurai, a location later "swallowed up by the sea", states Shulman.[18][19]The second academy, also chaired by a very long-lived Agastya, was near the eastern seaside Kapāṭapuram and lasted three millennia. This was swallowed by floods. From the second Sangam, states the legend, theAkattiyamand theTolkāppiyamsurvived and guided the third Sangam scholars.[18][19]
A prose commentary by Nakkiranar – likely about the eighth century CE – describes this legend.[20]The earliest known mention of the Sangam legend, however, appears inTirupputtur Tantakamby Appar in about the seventh century CE, while an extended version appears in the twelfth-centuryTiruvilaiyatal puranamby Perumparrap Nampi.[3]The legend states that the third Sangam of 449 poet scholars worked over 1,850 years in northern Madurai (Pandyan kingdom). He lists six anthologies of Tamil poems (later a part ofEttuttokai):[20]
- Netuntokai nanuru(400 long poems)
- Kuruntokai anuru(400 short poems)
- Narrinai(400 Tinai landscape poems)
- Purananuru(400 Outer poems)
- Ainkurunuru(500 very short poems)
- Patirruppattu(Ten Tens)
These claims of the Sangams and the description of sunken land massesKumari Kandamhave been dismissed as frivolous by historiographers. Noted historians like Kamil Zvelebil have stressed that the use of 'Sangam literature' to describe this corpus of literature is a misnomer andClassicalliterature should be used instead.[3]According to Shulman, "there is not the slightest shred of evidence that any such [Sangam] literary academies ever existed", though there are many Pandya inscriptions that mention an academy of scholars. Of particular note, states Shulman, is the tenth-century CE Sinnamanur inscription that mentions a Pandyan king who sponsored the "translation of theMahabharatainto Tamil "and established a" Madhurapuri (Madurai) Sangam ".[21][note 1]
According to Zvelebil, within the myth there is a kernel of reality, and all literary evidence leads one to conclude that "such an academy did exist in Madurai (Maturai) at the beginning of the Christian era". The homogeneity of the prosody, language and themes in these poems confirms that the Sangam literature was a community effort, a "group poetry".[23][note 2]The Sangam literature is also referred sometimes with terms such ascaṅka ilakkiyamor "Sangam age poetry".[3]
Historical Sangam period
[edit]InOld Tamil language,the termTamilakam(Tamiḻakam,Purananuru168. 18) referred to the whole of the ancient Tamil-speaking area,[web 1]corresponding roughly to the area known assouthern Indiatoday, consisting of the territories of the present-day Indian states ofTamil Nadu,Kerala,parts ofAndhra PradeshandKarnataka.Sri Lankais distinguished from it and is known as Ilam orEelam,[25]although also influenced by the Sangam Period.[26][27][web 2][note 3]
In Indian history, the Sangam period or age (Tamil:சங்ககாலம்,caṅkakālam) is the period of the history of ancient Tamil Nadu and Kerala (then known asTamilakam), and parts of Sri Lanka fromc. 300 BCEto 300 CE.[web 3]It was named after the literature of poets and scholars of the legendarySangam academiescentered in the city ofMadurai.[28]
In the period between 300 BCE and 300 CE, Tamilakam was ruled by the three Tamil dynasties ofPandya,CholaandChera,and a few independent chieftains, theVelir.The evidence on the early history of the Tamil kingdoms consists of the epigraphs of the region, the Sangam literature, and archaeological data.[27]
The fourfold Vedic system of caste hierarchy did not exist during the Sangam period. The society was organised by occupational groups living apart from each other.[29]
Corpus
[edit]Authors
[edit]The Sangam literature was composed by 473 poets, some 102 anonymous.[13]According to Nilakanta Sastri, the poets came from diverse backgrounds: some were from a royal family, some merchants, some farmers.[31]At least 27 of the poets were women. These poets emerged, states Nilakanta Sastri, in a milieu where the Tamil society had already interacted and inseparably amalgamated with north Indians (Indo-Aryan) and both sides had shared mythology, values and literary conventions.[31]
Compilations
[edit]The available literature from this period was categorised and compiled in the tenth century CE into two categories based roughly on chronology. The categories are thePatiṉeṇmēlkaṇakku( "Eighteen Greater Texts" ) comprisingEttuthogai(orEttuttokai,"Eight Anthologies" ) and thePattuppāṭṭu( "Ten Idylls" ) andPatiṉeṇkīḻkaṇakku( "Eighteen Lesser Texts" ). According toTakanobu Takahashi,the compilation of Patiṉeṇmēlkaṇakku poems are as follows:[12]
Name | Extant poems | Original poems | Lines in poems | Number of poets |
Natrrinai | 400 | 400 | 9–12 | 175 |
Kuruntokai | 402 | 400 | 4–8 | 205 |
Ainkurunuru | 499 | 500 | 3–6 | 5 |
Patirruppattu | 86 | 10x10 | varies | 8 |
Paripatal | 33 | 70 | varies | 13 |
Kalittokai | 150 | 150 | varies | 5 |
Akananuru | 401 | 400 | 12–31 | 145 |
Purananuru | 398 | 400 | varies | 157 |
Name | Lines | Author |
Tirumurukarruppatai | 317 | Nakkirar |
Porunararruppatai | 234 | Mutattamakkanniyar |
Cirupanarruppatai | 296 | Nattattanar |
Perumpanarruppatai | 500 | Uruttirankannaiyar |
Mullaippattu | 103 | Napputanar |
Maturaikkanci | 782 | Mankuti Marutanar |
Netunalvatai | 188 | Nakkirar |
Kurincippattu | 261 | Kapilar |
Pattinappalai | 301 | Uruttirankannanar |
Malaipatukatam | 583 | Perunkaucikanar |
The compilation of poems from Patiṉeṇkīḻkaṇakku are as follows:
- Nālaṭiyār
- Nāṉmaṇikkaṭikai
- Iṉṉā Nāṟpatu
- Iṉiyavai Nāṟpatu
- Kār Nāṟpatu
- Kaḷavaḻi Nāṟpatu
- Aintiṇai Aimpatu
- Tiṉaimoḻi Aimpatu
- Aintinai Eḻupatu
- Tiṉaimalai Nūṟṟu Aimpatu
- Tirukkuṛaḷ
- Tirikaṭukam
- Ācārakkōvai
- Paḻamoḻi Nāṉūṟu
- Ciṟupañcamūlam
- Mutumoḻikkānci
- Elāti
- Kainnilai
Classification
[edit]Sangam literature is broadly classified intoakam(அகம்,inner), andpuram(புறம்,outer).[32]Theakampoetry is about emotions and feelings in the context of romantic love, sexual union and eroticism. Thepurampoetry is about exploits and heroic deeds in the context of war and public life.[23][32]Approximately three-fourths of the Sangam poetry isakamthemed, and about one fourth ispuram.[33]
Sangam literature, bothakamandpuram,can be subclassified into seven minor genre calledtiṇai(திணை). This minor genre is based on the location or landscape in which the poetry is set.[33]These are:kuṟiñci(குறிஞ்சி), mountainous regions;mullai(முல்லை), pastoral forests;marutam(மருதம்), riverine agricultural land;neytal(நெய்தல்) coastal regions;pālai(பாலை) arid.[33][34]In addition to the landscape basedtiṇais, forakampoetry,ain-tinai(well matched, mutual love),kaikkilai(ill matched, one sided), andperunthinai(unsuited, big genre) categories are used.[33]TheAinkurunuru– 500 short poems anthology – is an example of mutual love poetry.[15]
Similartiṇais pertain topurampoems as well, categories are sometimes based on activity:vetchi(cattle raid),vanchi(invasion, preparation for war),kanchi(tragedy),ulinai(siege),tumpai(battle),vakai(victory),paataan(elegy and praise),karanthai,andpothuviyal.[33]Theakampoetry uses metaphors and imagery to set the mood, never uses names of person or places, often leaves the context as well that the community will fill in and understand given theiroral tradition.Thepurampoetry is more direct, uses names and places, states Takanobu Takahashi.[35]
Style and prosody
[edit]The early Sangam poetry diligently follows two meters, while the later Sangam poetry is a bit more diverse.[36][37]The two meters found in the early poetry areakavalandvanci.[38]The fundamental metrical unit in these is theacai(metreme[39]), itself of two types –nerandnirai.Theneris the stressed/long syllable in European prosody tradition, while theniraiis the unstressed/short syllable combination (pyrrhic(dibrach) andiambic) metrical feet, with similar equivalents in the Sanskrit prosody tradition.[38]Theacaiin the Sangam poems are combined to form acir(foot), while thecirare connected to form atalai,while the line is referred to as theati.[40]Thesutrasof theTolkappiyam– particularly aftersutra315 – state the prosody rules, enumerating the 34 component parts of ancient Tamil poetry.[40]
The prosody of an example early Sangam poem is illustrated byKuruntokai:[41]
Part ofa serieson |
Hinduism |
---|
Part ofa serieson |
Jainism |
---|
|
ciṟuveḷ ḷaravi ṉavvarik kuruḷai
kāṉa yāṉai aṇaṅki yāaṅ
kiḷaiyaṇ muḷaivā ḷeyiṟṟaḷ
vaḷaiyuṭaik kaiyaḷem maṇaṅki yōḷē
–Kuruntokai 119,Author: Catti Nataanr
The prosodic pattern in this poem follows the 4-4-3-4 feet per line, according toakaval,also calledaciriyam,Sangam meter rule:[41]
= – / = – / – = / = –
– – / – – / = – / – –
= – / = – / = –
= = / – = / = – / – –
Note: "=" is aner,while "–" is aniraiin Tamil terminology.
A literal translation ofKuruntokai 119:[41]
little-white-snake of lovely-striped young-body
jungle elephant troubling like
the young-girl sprouts-brightness toothed-female
bangle(s) possessing hand(s)-female "
– Translator: Kamil Zvelebil
English interpretation and translation ofKuruntokai 119:[41]
As a little white snake
with lovely stripes on its young body
troubles the jungle elephant
this slip of a girl
her teeth like sprouts of new rice
her wrists stacked with bangles
troubles me.
– Creative translator: A.K. Ramanujan (1967)
This metrical pattern, states Zvelebil, gives the Sangam poetry a "wonderful conciseness, terseness, pithiness", then an inner tension that is resolved at the end of the stanza.[42]The metrical patterns within theakavalmeter in early Sangam poetry has minor variations.[43]The later Sangam era poems follow the same general meter rules, but sometimes feature 5 lines (4-4-4-3-4).[39][44][45]The later Sangam age texts employ other meters as well, such as the Kali meter inKalittokaiand the mixed Paripatal meter inParipatal.[46]
Preservation and rediscovery
[edit]The works of Sangam literature were lost and forgotten for most of the 2nd millennium. They were rediscovered by colonial-era scholars such asArumuka Navalar(1822–1879),C.W. Damodaram Pillai(1832–1901) andU. V. Swaminatha Aiyar(1855–1942).[49]
Arumuka NavalarfromJaffnafirst inaugurated the modern editions of Tamil classics, publishing a fine edition ofTirukkuṟaḷby 1860.[50]Navalar – who translated the Bible into Tamil while working as an assistant to a Methodist Christian missionary, chose to defend and popularizeShaiva Hinduismagainst missionary polemics, in part by bringing ancient Tamil andShaivaliterature to wider attention.[51]He brought the first Sangam text into print in 1851 (Tirumurukāṟṟuppaṭai,one of theTen Idylls). In 1868, Navalar published an early commentary onTolkappiyam.[52]
C.W. Damodaram Pillai,also fromJaffna,was the earliest scholar to systematically hunt for long-lost manuscripts and publish them using modern tools of textual criticism.[53]These included:
- Viracoliyam (1881)
- Iraiyanar Akapporul(1883)
- Tolkappiyam-Porulatikaram (1885)
- Kalittokai(1887) - the first of the Eight Anthologies (Eṭṭuttokai).
Aiyar– a Tamil scholar and aShaivapundit, in particular, is credited with his discovery of major collections of the Sangam literature in 1883. During his personal visit to the Thiruvavaduthurai Adhinam – a Shaiva matha about twenty kilometers northeast ofKumbhakonam,he reached out to the monastery head Subrahmanya Desikar for access to its large library of preserved manuscripts. Desikar granted Aiyar permission to study and publish any manuscripts he wanted.[12]There, Aiyar discovered a major source of preserved palm-leaf manuscripts of Sangam literature.[12][54]Aiyar published his first print of theTen Idyllsin 1889.
Together, these scholars printed and publishedKalittokai(1887),Tholkappiyam,Nachinarkiniyar Urai(1895),Tholkappiyam Senavariyar urai(1868),Manimekalai(1898),Silappatikaram(1889),Pattuppāṭṭu(1889),Patiṟṟuppattu(1889).Puṟanāṉūṟu(1894),Aiṅkurunūṟu(1903),Kuṟuntokai(1915),Naṟṟiṇai(1915),Paripāṭal(1918) andAkanāṉūṟu(1923) all with scholarly commentaries. They published more than 100 works in all, including minor poems.
Significance
[edit]The Sangam literature is the historic evidence of indigenous literary developments in South India in parallel toSanskrit,and the classical status of the Tamil language. While there is no evidence for the first and second mythical Sangams, the surviving literature attests to a group of scholars centered around the ancientMadurai(Maturai) that shaped the "literary, academic, cultural and linguistic life of ancient Tamil Nadu", states Zvelebil.[55]On their significance, Zvelebil quotesA. K. Ramanujan,"In their antiquity and in their contemporaneity, there is not much else in any Indian literature equal to these quiet and dramatic Tamil poems. In their values and stances, they represent a mature classical poetry: passion is balanced by courtesy, transparency by ironies and nuances of design, impersonality by vivid detail, austerity of line by richness of implication. These poems are not just the earliest evidence of the Tamil genius."[56]
The Sangam literature offers a window into some aspects of the ancient Tamil culture, secular and religious beliefs, and the people. For example, in the Sangam eraAinkurunurupoem 202 is one of the earliest mentions of "pigtail ofBrahminboys ".[57]These poems also allude to historical incidents, ancient Tamil kings, the effect of war on loved ones and households.[58]ThePattinappalaipoem in the Ten Idylls group, for example, paints a description of the Chola capital, the king Karikal, the life in a harbor city with ships and merchandise for seafaring trade, the dance troupes, the bards and artists, the worship of the Hindu godVishnu,Muruganand the monasteries of Buddhism and Jainism. This Sangam era poem remained in the active memory and was significant to the Tamil people centuries later, as evidenced by its mention nearly 1,000 years later in the 11th- and 12th-century inscriptions and literary work.[59]
Sangam literature embeds evidence of loan words from Sanskrit, suggesting on-going linguistic and literary collaboration between ancient Tamil Nadu and other parts of the Indian subcontinent.[60][note 5]One of the early loan words, for example, isacarya–from Sanskrit for a "spiritual guide or teacher", which in Sangam literature appears asaciriyan(priest, teacher, scholar),aciriyamorakavarorakavalorakavu(a poetic meter).[64][note 6]
The Sangam poetry focuses on the culture and people. It is religious as well as non-religious, as there are several mentions of the Hindu gods and more substantial mentions of various gods in the shorter poems. The 33 surviving poems ofParipaatalin the "Eight Anthologies" group praisesVishnu,DurgaandMurugan.[2][17][note 7]Similarly, the 150 poems ofKalittokai– also from the Eight Anthologies group – mention Krishna, Shiva, Murugan, various Pandava brothers of theMahabharata,Kama, goddesses such as Ganga, divine characters from classical love stories of India.[68]One of the poems also mentions the "merciful men ofBenares",an evidence of interaction between the northern holy city of the Hindus with the Sangam poets.[68]Some of theParipaatallove poems are set in the context of bathing festivals (Magh Mela) and various Hindu gods. They mention temples and shrines, confirming the significance of such cultural festivals and architectural practices to the Tamil culture.[68]
Religion in the Sangam agewas an important reason for the increase inTamil Literature.AncientTamilsPrimarily followedVaishnavism(Who consider Vishnu as the Supreme Deity) andKaumaram(who worship Murugan as the Supreme god). According toKamil Zvelebil,Vishnuwas considered ageless (The god who stays for ever) and the Supreme god ofTamilswhere asSkandawas considered young and a personal god ofTamils.[69][70]
Mayonis indicated to be the deity associated with themullai tiṇai(pastoral landscape) in theTolkappiyam.[71][72]Tolkappiyar MentionsMayonfirst when he made reference to deities in the different land divisions.[73]TheParipādal(Tamil:பரிபாடல்,meaningthe paripadal-metre anthology) is a classicalTamilpoetic work and traditionally the fifth of theEight Anthologies(Ettuthokai) in the Sangam literature.[citation needed]According toTolkappiyam,Paripadal is a kind of verse dealing only with love (akapporul) and does not fall under the general classification of verses. Sangam literature (200 BCE to 500 CE) mentionsMayonor the "dark one," as the Supreme deity who creates, sustains, and destroys the universe and was worshipped in the Plains and mountains ofTamilakam.The Earliest verses ofParipadaldescribe the glory of Perumal in the most poetic of terms. Many Poems of theParipadalconsiderPerumalas the Supreme god ofTamils.[74]He is regarded to be the only deity who enjoyed the status ofParamporul(achieving oneness withParamatma) during theSangam age.He is also known as Māyavan, Māmiyon, Netiyōn, and Māl in Sangam literature and considered as the most mentioned god in the Sangam literature.[75]
Cēyōṉ"the red one", who is identified withMurugan,whose name is literallyMurukaṉ"the youth" in theTolkāppiyam;Extant Sangam literature works, dated between the third century BCE and the fifth century CE glorified Murugan, "the red god seated on the blue peacock, who is ever young and resplendent," as "the favoured god of the Tamils."[76]There are no Mentions ofShaivisminTolkappiyam.[77]ShivaandBrahmaare said to be forms OfMaha Vishnuand considers Vishnu as The Supreme god inParipāṭal.[78]
There are two poems depicted as example ofBhaktiin AncientTamil Nadu,one in the praise ofMaha Vishnuand other ofMurugan
To Tirumal (Maha Vishnu):
தீயினுள் தெறல் நீ; |
In fire, you are the heat; |
—Paripadal, iii: 63-68 | —F Gros, K Zvelebil[79] |
To Seyyon (Skandha):
We pray you not for wealth,
not for gold, not for pleasure;
But for your grace, for love, for virtue,
these three,
O god with the rich garland ofkaṭampuflowers
with rolling clusters!–Pari. v.: 78–81[79]
The other gods also referred to in theTolkappiyamareVēntaṉ"the sovereign" (identified withIndra) andKorravai"the victorious" (identified withDurga) andVarunan"the sea god".[80]
The Sangam literature also emphasized on fair governance by Kings, who were often described as Sengol-valavan, the king who established just rule; the king was warned by priests that royal injustice would lead to divine punishment; and handing over of a royalscepter,Sengoldenoting decree to rule fairly, finds mention in texts such as the Purananooru, Kurunthogai, Perumpaanatrupadai, and Kalithogai.[81][82]
Further, the colophons of theParipaatalpoems mention music and tune, signifying the development and the importance of musical arts in ancient Tamil Nadu. According to Zvelebil, these poems were likely from the late Sangam era (2nd or 3rd century CE) and attest to a sophisticated and prosperous ancient civilization.[68]
Modern musical renditions
[edit]The first music album on Tamil Sangam poetry titledSandham: Symphony Meets Classical Tamilby ComposerRajan Somasundaramin collaboration with Durham Symphony, featured in Amazon's Top#10 'International Music albums' category in July 2020 and was called "A Major event in the world of Music" by The Hindu Music review.[83]
Sangam poems are often quoted and paraphrased in modern Tamil cinema.[84][85]
See also
[edit]- Project Madurai:open access Tamil literature repository
- List of historic Indian texts
- Tamiḻakam
- First Sangam
- Second Sangam
- Tamil Sangams
- List of Sangam poets
- Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam
Notes
[edit]- ^This is, however, not the first inscription to support the sangam legend. According to Eva Wilden, the first inscription to hint the existence of a "sangam" legend is found in the Erukkankuti plates of 829 CE. A part of this inscription says, "the lord of excellent Alankuti that is praised in the worlds, on the firm big bench of stone in Kutal [Maturai] with cool Tamil great in words". While the context and the last part about Kutal echoes the existence of a Tamil scholar academy in Madurai, it does not presuppose or confirm the existence of a full-fledged three sangam periods legend by the ninth century CE, states Wilden.[22]
- ^According to Zvelebil, the hypothesis proposed by some that the first and second academy may have referred to the Buddhist and Jaina monk assemblies can "hardly" be true. Rather, states Zvelebil, it is more likely that the first academy of poets existed sometime about 400–300 BCE – which he adds, is also a "purely speculative" conjecture. The persistence of three gods – Siva, Murukavel [Murugan] and Kubera – in the legendary account and the classical Tamil literature, states Zvelebil, suggests that the beginnings of Tamil literature and civilization were "closely connected with the cults" of these three gods in ancient Tamil Nadu.[24]
- ^Wilson 2000,p. 14: "They had earlier felt secure in the concept of the Tamilakam, a vast area of" Tamilness "from the south of Dekhan in India to the north of Sri Lanka..."
- ^The private U.V. Swaminatha Aiyar library preserves the largest collection of Sangam era-related manuscripts. Other notable collections of Sangam literature manuscripts are found in the Saraswati Mahal library and the Tamil University manuscript library inThanjavur(Tamil Nadu), the Oriental Research Institute and Manuscript library ofThiruvananthapuram(Kerala), as well as the private collections in old Hindu temples and monasteries. Less than 50% of all preserved palm leaf manuscripts, copied over the centuries over nearly 2,000 years, are in the Tamil language; the majority of these manuscripts preserved in Tamil Nadu and Kerala are in Sanskrit and Telugu (some Malayalam). Sangam literature manuscript collections typically include all three languages.[48]A few thousand of the Sangam and post-Sangam era manuscripts in Tamil language are now preserved in various European and American collections.[48]
- ^This collaboration was two way, and evidence for this is found in the earliest known Hindu scripture, theRigveda(1500–1200 BCE). About 300 words in theRigvedaare neither Indo-Aryan nor Indo-European, states the Sanskrit and Vedic literature scholarFrits Staal.[61]Of these 300, many – such askapardin,kumara,kumari,kikata– come from Munda or proto-Munda languages found in the eastern and northeastern (Assamese) region of India, with roots in Austro-Asiatic languages. The others in the list of 300 – such asmlecchaandnir– have Dravidian (Tamil, Telugu) roots found in the southern region of India, or are of Tibeto-Burman origins.[61][62]The linguistic sharing provide clear indications, statesMichael Witzel,that the people who spoke Rigvedic Sanskrit already knew and interacted with Munda and Dravidian speakers.[63]
- ^According to George Hart, other than loan words, it is obvious to any scholar who has studied both classical Sanskrit and classical Tamil that the mid to late Sangam literature (1st to 3rd century CE) and ancient Sanskrit literature are related. However, adds Hart, the earliest layer of the Sangam literature "does not seem to be much influenced by Sanskrit".[65]
- ^Other Sangam poems mention gods and goddesses. For example,Purananuru 23,Akananuru 22,Tirumurukarruppatai 83–103and others mention god Murugan, his wife Valli, the iconographic peacock, and the Vedas; Murugan's mother – goddess Korravai (Amma, Uma, Parvati, Durga) is mentioned inAkananuru 345,Kalittokai 89,Perumpanarruppatai 459and elsewhere. She is both a mother goddess and the goddess of war and victory in Sangam poetry.[66][67]
References
[edit]- ^K Kailasapathy (1968).Tamil Heroic Poetry.Clarendon Press. p. 1.ISBN9780198154341.
- ^abcdUpinder Singh (2008).A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century.Pearson Education India. pp. 27–28.ISBN978-81-317-1120-0.
- ^abcdKamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 45–49 with footnotes
- ^Roma Chatterjee, ed. (2021).India: Society, Religion and Literature in Ancient and Medieval Periods(1st ed.). New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. p. 73.ISBN978-93-5409-122-3.
- ^Nadarajah, Devapoopathy (1994).Love in Sanskrit and Tamil Literature: A Study of Characters and Nature, 200 B.C.-A.D. 500.Motilal Banarsidass Publ.ISBN978-81-208-1215-4.
- ^University, Vijaya Ramaswamy, Jawaharlal Nehru (25 August 2017).Historical Dictionary of the Tamils.Rowman & Littlefield.ISBN978-1-5381-0686-0.
{{cite book}}
:CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^Hartmut Scharfe (1977).Grammatical Literature.Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 178–179.ISBN978-3-447-01706-0.
- ^abKamil Zvelebil (1992).Companion Studies to the History of Tamil Literature.BRILL Academic. pp. 12–13.ISBN90-04-09365-6.
- ^Kallidaikurichi Aiyah Nilakanta Sastri (1958).A history of South India from prehistoric times to the fall of Vijayanagar.Oxford University Press. pp. 110–112.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1974,pp. 9–10 with footnotes.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1974,pp. 7–8 with footnotes.
- ^abcdefgTakanobu Takahashi (1995).Tamil Love Poetry and Poetics.BRILL Academic. pp. 1–3 with footnotes.ISBN90-04-10042-3.
- ^abcdKamil Zvelebil 1974,pp. 9–10.
- ^George L. Hart III,The Poems of Ancient Tamil,U of California P, 1975.
- ^abSelby, Martha Ann, ed. (31 January 2011).Tamil Love Poetry.New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press.doi:10.7312/selb15064.ISBN978-0-231-52158-1.
- ^Kallidaikurichi Aiyah Nilakanta Sastri (1958).A history of South India from prehistoric times to the fall of Vijayanagar.Oxford University Press. pp. 110–119, 330–335.
- ^abSangam Literature,Encyclopaedia Britannica (2011)
- ^abcShulman 2016,pp. 27–28.
- ^abDaniélou, Alain (11 February 2003).A Brief History of India.Simon and Schuster.ISBN9781594777943.
- ^abShulman 2016,pp. 25–28.
- ^Shulman 2016,pp. 28–29.
- ^Wilden 2014,p. 12 with footnote 25.
- ^abKamil Zvelebil 1974,pp. 10–11.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1975,pp. 59–61 with footnotes.
- ^Manguin et al. (2011),p. 138.
- ^Wilson (2000),p. 14.
- ^abShinu (2003).
- ^Anjali (2017),p. 123–136.
- ^Nath sen (1999),p. 205.
- ^Rosen (1975).
- ^abK. A. Nilakanta Sastri (1950). "Sanskrit Elements in Early Tamil Literature".Proceedings of the Indian History Congress.13:43–45.JSTOR44140886.
- ^abThomas Manninezhath (1993).Harmony of Religions: Vedānta Siddhānta Samarasam of Tāyumānavar.Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 78–79.ISBN978-81-208-1001-3.
- ^abcdeTakanobu Takahashi (1995).Tamil Love Poetry and Poetics.BRILL Academic. pp. 3–5 with footnotes.ISBN90-04-10042-3.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 50–56.
- ^Takanobu Takahashi (1995).Tamil Love Poetry and Poetics.BRILL Academic. pp. 5–9 with footnotes.ISBN90-04-10042-3.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 65–71 with footnotes.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil (1989).Classical Tamil Prosody: An Introduction.New Era Publications. pp. 1–7, 50–55.ISBN9780836424591.
- ^abKamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 65–68.
- ^abNiklas, Ulrike (1988). "Introduction to Tamil Prosody".Bulletin de l'École française d'Extrême-Orient.77(1). PERSEE, France: 165–227.doi:10.3406/befeo.1988.1744.ISSN0336-1519.
- ^abAbraham Mariaselvam (1988).The Song of Songs and Ancient Tamil Love Poems: Poetry and Symbolism.Gregorian. pp. 124–127 with footnotes.ISBN978-88-7653-118-7.
- ^abcdKamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 66–67.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 71–72.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 67–72.
- ^Tschacher, Thorsten (2011). "Method and Theory in the Study of Caṅkam (Sangam) Literature".Orientalistische Literaturzeitung.106(1). Walter de Gruyter GmbH: 4–14.doi:10.1524/olzg.2011.0002.S2CID163609253.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 83–84.
- ^Wilden 2014,pp. 13–15 with footnotes.
- ^Jonas Buchholz and Giovanni Ciotti (2017),What a Multiple-text Manuscript Can Tell Us about the Tamil Scholarly Tradition: The Case of UVSL 589,Manuscri[pt Cultures, Vol. 10, Editors: Michael Friedrich and Jorg Quenzer, Universitat Hamburg, pages 129–142
- ^abWilden 2014,pp. 35–39.
- ^"Companion Studies to the History of Tamil Literature", Kamil V. Zvelebil
- ^A.R. Venkatachalapathy,Enna Prayocanam?' Constructing the canon in colonial Tamilnadu,Indian Economic Social History Review 2005 42:535, p544
- ^Dennis Hudson (1996). Raymond Brady Williams (ed.).A Sacred Thread: Modern Transmission of Hindu Traditions in India and Abroad.Columbia University Press. pp. 23–37.ISBN978-0-231-10779-2.
- ^Shulman 2016,pp. 301–303.
- ^A.R. Venkatachalapathy,Enna Prayocanam?' Constructing the canon in colonial Tamilnadu,Indian Economic Social History Review 2005 42:535, p544
- ^Kamil Zvelebil(1975). Jan Gonda (ed.).Handbook of Oriental Studies: Tamil Literature.BRILL Academic. pp. 108–109 with footnote 129.ISBN90-04-04190-7.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 45–46;Shulman 2016,pp. 28–30.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1974,p. 47.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,p. 51.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 51–56.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 57–58.
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 5–8, 51–56.
- ^abFrits Staal (2008).Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights.Penguin. pp. 23–24.ISBN978-0-14-309986-4.
- ^Franklin C Southworth (2016).Hock, Hans Henrich;Bashir, Elena(eds.).The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide.Walter de Gruyter. pp. 252–255.ISBN978-3-11-042330-3.
- ^Michael Witzel (2012). George Erdosy (ed.).The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity.Walter de Gruyter. pp. 98–110 with footnotes.ISBN978-3-11-081643-3.,Quote (p. 99): "Although the Middle/Late Vedic periods are the earliest for which we can reconstruct a linguistic map, the situation even at the time of the Indus Civilisation and certainly during the time of theearliest texts of the Rigveda,cannot have been very different. There are clear indications that the speakers of Rigvedic Sanskrit knew, and interacted with, Dravidian and Munda speakers. "
- ^Kamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 13–14.
- ^George L. Hart (1976).The Relation Between Tamil and Classical Sanskrit Literature.Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 317–326.ISBN978-3-447-01785-5.
- ^Ronald Ferenczi (2019). Róbert Válóczi (ed.).Goddess Woman.Museum of Fine Art Budapest, Hungarian National Gallery. pp. 108–111.ISBN978-615-5304-84-2.
- ^Hart III, George L. (1973). "Woman and the Sacred in Ancient Tamilnad".The Journal of Asian Studies.32(2). Cambridge University Press: 233–250.doi:10.2307/2052342.JSTOR2052342.S2CID163785902.
- ^abcdKamil Zvelebil 1973,pp. 123–128.
- ^Zvelebil, Kamil (22 October 1974).Tamil Literature.Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.ISBN9783447015820.
- ^A HISTORY OF INDIAN LITERATURE volume 10 TAMIL LITERATURE page number 49 written by Kamil Zvelebil
- ^Hardy, Friedhelm (1 January 2015).Viraha Bhakti: The Early History of Krsna Devotion.Motilal Banarsidass. p. 156.ISBN978-81-208-3816-1.
- ^Clothey, Fred W. (20 May 2019).The Many Faces of Murukan: The History and Meaning of a South Indian God. With the Poem Prayers to Lord Murukan.Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. p. 34.ISBN978-3-11-080410-2.
- ^Dr.C.R.Krishnamurti."2. The Sangam Period".tripod.
- ^"In praise of Vishnu".The Hindu.24 July 2014.
- ^Padmaja, T. (2002).Temples of Kr̥ṣṇa in South India: History, Art, and Traditions in Tamilnāḍu.Abhinav Publications. p. 27.ISBN978-81-7017-398-4.
- ^Kanchan Sinha, Kartikeya in Indian art and literature, Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan (1979).
- ^Journal of Tamil Studies, Volume 1.International Institute of Tamil Studies. 1969. p. 131.Archivedfrom the original on 13 November 2017.
- ^Paripāṭal Poem 1 Line 50 to 56 ஐந்தலை உயிரிய அணங்குடை அருந்திறல் மைந்துடை ஒருவனும்– you are the one with five heads who causes great fear and is one of great ability and strength – Sivan, மடங்கலும்நீ – one where all lives end, நலம் முழுது அளைஇய – with all benefits, புகர்அறு காட்சிப் புலமும்– faultless learning – Vēdās, பூவனும் – you are Brahman who appeared on a flower, நாற்றமும்நீ – you are creation created by Brahman, வலன் உயர் எழிலியும் – clouds that rise up with strength, மாக விசும்பும் – wide sky, நிலனும்– land, நீடிய இமயமும்– and the tall Himalayas, நீ– you, அதனால் – so, இன்னோர் அனையை– like so and so, இனையையால்– like somebody, என– thus, அன்னோர் – those, யாம் இவண் காணாமையின் – I have not seen here, பொன் அணி நேமி – wheels decorated with gold, வலம் கொண்டு ஏந்திய – lifting on your right side or lifting with strength, மன்னுயிர் முதல்வனை – you are supreme to all the living beings on the Earth.
- ^abKamil Zvelebil 1974,p. 49.
- ^Journal of Tamil Studies, Volume 1.International Institute of Tamil Studies. 1969. p. 131.Archivedfrom the original on 13 November 2017.
- ^Balasubrahmanyam, S (1977).Middle Chola Temples Rajaraja I to Kulottunga I (A.D. 985-1070).Oriental Press. p. 291.ISBN9789060236079.
- ^Charan, Sai (24 May 2023)."The Sengol — A historic sceptre with a deep Tamil Nadu connection".thehindu.
- ^"A Major event in the world of Music- The Hindu Music Review".The Hindu Tamil. 28 February 2020.Retrieved2 March2020.
- ^Sangam poems in contemporary songshttps:// newindianexpress /entertainment/tamil/2017/mar/26/sangam-poems-in-contemporary-songs-1586219.html
- ^Narumugaiye - A.R.Rahman - Mirchi Unplugged Season 1https:// youtube /watch?v=QatLrdzalew
Sources
[edit]- Anjali (2017).Social and Cultural History of Ancient India.Lucknow: OnlineGatha—The Endless Tale.ISBN978-93-86352-69-9.
- JV Chelliah (1946).Pattupattu - Ten Tamil Idylls (Tamil Verses with Englilsh Translation).Tamil University (1985 print).
- Daniélou, Alain (11 February 2003).A Brief History of India.Simon and Schuster.ISBN9781594777943.
- Thomas Lehmann; Thomas Malten (1992).A Word Index of Old Tamil Caṅkam Literature.F. Steiner.ISBN978-3-515-05814-8.
- Manguin, Pierre-Yves; Mani, A.; Wade, Geoff (2011).Early Interactions Between South and Southeast Asia: Reflections on Cross Cultural exchange.Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.ISBN9789814345101.
- P. Meenakshi Sundaram (1965).History of Tamil Literature.Annamalai University.
- V. S. Rajam (1992).A Reference Grammar of Classical Tamil Poetry.American Philosophical Society.ISBN978-0-87169-199-6.
- Ray, Himanshu Prabha (2003).The archaeology of seafaring in ancient South Asia.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780521011099.
- Rosen, Elizabeth S. (1975). "Prince ILango Adigal, Shilappadikaram (The anklet Bracelet), translated by Alain Damelou. Review".Artibus Asiae.37(1/2): 148–150.doi:10.2307/3250226.JSTOR3250226.
- Nath sen, Sailendra (1999).Ancient Indian History and Civilization(Second ed.). Routledge. p. 205.ISBN9788122411980.
- Selby, Martha Ann (2011) Tamil Love Poetry: The Five Hundred Short Poems of the Aiṅkuṟunūṟu, an Early Third-Century Anthology. Columbia University Press,ISBN9780231150651
- Shinu, Abraham (2003)."Chera, Chola, Pandya: using archaeological evidence to identify the Tamil kingdoms of early historic South India".Asian Perspectives.42(2): 207–223.doi:10.1353/asi.2003.0031.hdl:10125/17189.S2CID153420843.
- Shulman, David (2016).Tamil.Harvard University Press.ISBN978-0-674-97465-4.
- Takanobu Takahashi (1995).Tamil Love Poetry and Poetics.BRILL Academic.ISBN90-04-10042-3.
- Herman Tieken (2001).Kāvya in South India: Old Tamil Caṅkam Poetry.BRILL.ISBN978-90-6980-134-6.
- Wilden, Eva Maria (2014).Manuscript, Print and Memory: Relics of the Cankam in Tamilnadu.Walter de Gruyter.ISBN978-3-11-035276-4.
- Wilson, A.Jeyaratnam (2000).Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism: Its Origins and Development in 19th and 20th Centuries.UBC Press.ISBN9780774807593.Retrieved28 April2012.
- Kamil Zvelebil (1973).The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India.BRILL.ISBN90-04-03591-5.
- Kamil Zvelebil (1974).Tamil Literature.Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.ISBN978-3-447-01582-0.
- Kamil Zvelebil (1975).Tamil Literature.Handbook of Oriental Studies. BRILL.ISBN90-04-04190-7.
- Web-sources
- ^Saju, M. T. (20 September 2019)."Carbon dating confirms Keeladi 3 centuries older".The Times of India.Retrieved8 February2021.
- ^"Women, Transition, and Change: A Study of the Impact of Conflict and Displacement on Women in Traditional Tamil Society".1995.
- ^Jesudasan, Dennis S. (20 September 2019)."Keezhadi excavations: Sangam era older than previously thought, finds study".The Hindu.ISSN0971-751X.Retrieved12 August2021.