Jump to content

Sarah Jamie Lewis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sarah Jamie Lewisis an anonymity and privacy researcher with published research in the fields of deanonymization[1]and e-voting.[2]She also has a special interest in the privacy protocols (or lack thereof) ofsex toys.[3][4]She has been cited in academic research regarding the security[5][6]andethics[7]considerations associated with this technology.

In 2019, Lewis in collaboration with researchers from the University of Melbourne and UCLouvain published details of critical vulnerabilities impacting e-voting systems in Switzerland[8]and Australia[9][10]

Lewis has shared concerns about the lack of legal framework related to the field ofoniondildonics, stating that "We are currently sprinting into this world of connected sex toys and connected sex tech without regards to what consent, privacy, or security means in that context..." and recommending "100% encryptedpeer-to-peercyber sex overtorhidden services. "[11]More generally, due to the litigious environment in which computer security researchers operate, she has opted to build bespoke secure systems rather than fix broken systems.[12]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Johnson, Alex (7 February 2017)."Hackers take down thousands of 'dark web' sites, post private data".NBC News.Retrieved5 March2024.
  2. ^Wuthrich, Bernard (29 March 2019)."Le vote électronique de La Poste est suspendu jusqu'à nouvel avis - Le Temps"(in French). Le Temps.Retrieved5 March2024.
  3. ^Rogers, Adam (2018-02-02)."The Squishy Ethics of Sex With Robots".Wired.Retrieved2018-02-02.
  4. ^Doctorow, Cory (2018-02-02)."The Internet of Connected Sex Toys is every bit as horrifyingly insecure and poorly thought out as you imagine".Boing Boing.Retrieved2018-02-02.
  5. ^Wynn, Matthew (2017-11-03)."Sexual Intimacy in the Age of Smart Devices: Are We Practicing Safe IoT?".ACM.org.Retrieved2018-02-26.
  6. ^Sarah Jamie Lewis [@SarahJamieLewis](2018-02-24)."While conducting a lit review for something unrelated, part of this paragraph surfaced during a search, started reading, then realized it was about me and my vibrator. Congrats everyone we got my vibrator into an academic paper. https://t.co/KQdVdpXBEb https://t.co/oZjv1YW553"(Tweet).Retrieved2022-01-24– viaTwitter.
  7. ^Sarah Jamie Lewis [@SarahJamieLewis](2018-02-04)."Regardless of what you want to do, I'd suggest reading this @engadget article about the very real ethical considerations associated with this technology. https://t.co/w8bJPqjXqc"(Tweet).Archivedfrom the original on 2019-03-30.Retrieved2022-01-24– viaTwitter.
  8. ^Zetter, Kim (12 March 2019)."Researchers Find Critical Backdoor in Swiss Online Voting System".Vice.Retrieved5 March2024.
  9. ^Hendry, Justin (19 March 2019)."Crypto defect found in Swiss e-voting system".iTnews.Retrieved5 March2024.
  10. ^Barbaschow, Asha (29 June 2020)."Australian electoral legislation amendments leave door open to electronic voting".ZDNET.Retrieved5 March2024.
  11. ^Burgess, Matt (2018-02-03)."Smart dildos and vibrators keep getting hacked – but Tor could be the answer to safer connected sex Connected sex toys are gathering huge amounts of data about our most intimate moments. Problem is, they're always getting hacked. Welcome to the emerging field of Onion Dildonics".Wired.Retrieved2018-02-09.
  12. ^Whittaker, Zack (2018-02-19)."Lawsuits threaten infosec research — just when we need it most".ZDNet.Retrieved2018-02-21.
[edit]