Jump to content

Sidney Hook

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sidney Hook
Hook in late life
Born(1902-12-20)December 20, 1902
New York City, US
DiedJuly 12, 1989(1989-07-12)(aged 86)
Alma materCity College of New York
Columbia University
Era20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolPragmatism
Marxism(early)
Main interests
Political philosophy,philosophy of education
Notable ideas
Ethics of controversy

Sidney Hook(December 20, 1902 – July 12, 1989) was an American philosopher ofpragmatismknown for his contributions to thephilosophy of history,thephilosophy of education,political theory,andethics.After embracingcommunismin his youth, Hook was later known for his criticisms oftotalitarianism,bothfascismandMarxism–Leninism.Asocial democrat,Hook sometimes cooperated withconservatives,particularly in opposing Marxism–Leninism. AfterWorld War II,he argued that members of such groups as theCommunist Party USAandLeninistslikedemocratic centralistscould ethically be barred from holding the offices of public trust because they called for the violent overthrow of democratic governments.

Background

[edit]
Albert Einstein,Sidney Hook et al. signed a 4 December 1948 letter published in theNew York Times[2]

Sidney Hook was born on December 20, 1902, inBrooklyn,New York City,to Jennie and Isaac Hook,AustrianJewishimmigrants. He became a supporter of theSocialist Party of Americaduring theDebsera when he was in high school.[citation needed]

In 1923, he earned aBAat theCity College of New Yorkand in 1927Ph.D.atColumbia University,where he studied underpragmatistphilosopherJohn Dewey.[citation needed]

Career

[edit]

In 1926, Hook became a professor of philosophy atNew York Universityand was head of theDepartment of Philosophyfrom 1948 to 1969. He retired from the University in 1972.[citation needed]

In 1931, Hook began teaching at theNew School for Social Researchthrough 1936, after which he taught night school there until the 1960s.[3]By 1933, Hook and New School colleagueHorace M. Kallenwere serving also on theACLU's academic freedom committee.[4]

Marxist

[edit]

At the beginning of his career, Hook was a prominent expert onKarl Marx's philosophy and was himself aMarxist.He attended the lectures ofKarl Korschin Berlin in 1928 and conducted research at theMarx-Engels InstituteinMoscowin the summer of 1929.[5]At first, he wrote enthusiastically about theSoviet Union,and, in 1932, supported theCommunist Party's candidate,William Z. Foster,when he ran forPresident of the United States.However, Hook broke completely with theCominternin 1933, holding its policies responsible for the triumph ofNazisminGermany.He accusedJoseph Stalinof putting "the needs of the Russian state" over the needs of the international revolution.[6]

However, Hook remained active in some of the causes of the Marxist left during theGreat Depression.In 1933, withJames Burnham,Hook was one of the organizers of theAmerican Workers Party,led by the Dutch-bornpacifistministerA.J. Muste.[7]Hook also debated the meaning of Marxism with radicalMax Eastmanin a series of public exchanges.[8]Eastman, like Hook, had studied under John Dewey at Columbia University. In the late 1930s, Hook assistedLeon Trotskyin his efforts to clear his name in a specialCommission of Inquiryheaded by Dewey, which investigated charges made against Trotsky during theMoscow Trials.[citation needed]

Anti-communist

[edit]

TheGreat Purgeencouraged Hook's increasing ambivalence toward Marxism. In 1939, Hook formed the Committee for Cultural Freedom, a short-lived organization that set the stage for his postwar politics by opposing "totalitarianism" on the left and right. By theCold War,Hook had become a prominentanti-Communist,although he continued to consider himself both ademocratic socialistand asecular humanistthroughout his life. He was, therefore, an anti-Communist socialist. In 1973, he was one of the signers of theHumanist Manifesto II.[9]

In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Hook helped found Americans for Intellectual Freedom, theCongress for Cultural Freedom(CCF), and theAmerican Committee for Cultural Freedom.These bodies—of which the CCF was most central—were funded in part by theCentral Intelligence Agencythrough a variety of fronts and sought to dissuade American leftists from continuing to advocate cooperation with theSoviet Unionas some had previously.[10]Hook later wrote in his memoirs that he, "like almost everyone else," had heard that "the CIA was making some contribution to the financing of the Congress."[11]

On February 6, 1953, Hook discussed "The Threat to Academic Freedom" withVictor Rieseland others in the evening onWEVDradio (a Socialist radio station whose call letters referred to SPA founderEugene V. Debs).[12]In May 1953, theJohn Day CompanypublishedHeresy, Yes–Conspiracy, No,[13]a 283-page book expanded from a 1952 pamphlet (Heresy, Yes–Conspiracy, No![14]), itself expanded from a 1950New York Timesarticle called "Heresy, Yes–But Conspiracy, No."[15]

In the 1960s, Hook was a frequent critic of theNew Left.He was opposed to a unilateral withdrawal of U.S. forces from theVietnam Warand defended California GovernorRonald Reagan's removal ofAngela Davisfrom her professorship atUCLAbecause of her leadership role in theCommunist Party USA.

Hook was elected a fellow of theAmerican Academy of Arts and Sciencesin 1965[16]and ended his career in the 1970s and 1980s as a fellow of theconservativeHoover InstitutioninStanford,California.

Later years

[edit]

TheNational Endowment for the Humanitiesselected Hook for the 1984Jefferson Lecture,the U.S. government's highest honor for achievement in thehumanities.[17]Hook's lecture was entitled "Education in Defense of a Free Society."[18][19]

Personal life and death

[edit]

Hook was a lifelong agnostic.[20]

He married Carrie Katz in 1924, with whom he had one son. The couple separated in 1933.[21][1]Katz had studied at theRand Schoolin the early 1920s. There, she studied underScott Nearingand came to write a chapter in his bookThe Law of Social Revolutionentitled "The Russian Revolution of 1917" (1926). Friends from the Rand School included Nerma Berman Oggins, wife ofCy Oggins.She was a Communist Party member who was a "Fosterite" (i.e., she supportedWilliam Z. Fosteramidst Party factionalism in the last 1920s). She went on to work at theLabor Defense Council.[22]In 1935, Hook married Ann Zinken, with whom he had two children.[21]

Hook died age 86 on July 12, 1989, in Stanford, California.

Awards

[edit]

Legacy

[edit]

Hook's memoir,Out of Step,recounts his life, his activism for a number of educational causes, his controversies with other intellectuals such asNoam Chomsky,and his recollections ofMortimer J. Adler,Bertolt Brecht,Morris Cohen,John Dewey,Max Eastman,Albert EinsteinandBertrand Russell.[24]

In October 2002, a conference marking the centennial of Hook's birth was organized by Matthew Cotter andRobert Talisseand held at theCity University of New YorkGraduate Center inManhattan.

In April 2011 theCommittee for Skeptical Inquiry(CSI) (formerly known as CSICOP) again honored Hook. At a meeting of its executive council inDenver,Coloradohe was selected for inclusion in their Pantheon of Skeptics. The Pantheon of Skeptics was created by CSI to remember the legacy of deceased fellows of CSI and their contributions to the cause of scientific skepticism.[25]

Hero in History

[edit]

Sidney Hook's bookThe Hero in Historywas a noticeable event in the studies devoted to the role of thehero,theGreat Manin history and the influence of people of significant accomplishments.

Hook opposed all forms ofdeterminismand argued, as hadWilliam James,that humans play a creative role in constructing the social world and to transforming their natural environment. Neither humanity nor its universe is determined or finished. For Hook this conviction was crucial. He argued that when a society is at the crossroads of choosing the direction of further development, an individual can play a dramatic role and even become an independent power on whom the choice of the historical pathway depends.[26]

In his book, Hook provided a great number of examples of the influence of great people, and the examples are mostly associated with various crucial moments in history, such as revolutions and crises. Some scholars have critically responded because, as one of them claims, "he does not take into account that an individual's greatest influence can be revealed not so much in the period of the old regime's collapse, but in the formation period of a new one. [...] Besides, he did not make clear the situation when alternatives appear either as the result of a crisis or as the result of Great Man's plan or intention without [a] manifested crisis".[27]

Hook introduced a theoretical division of historic personalities and especially leaders into the eventful man and the event-making man, depending on their influences on the historical process.[28]For example, he considersLeninas having been an event-making man, because of his having acted in an important circumstance to change the developmental direction not only ofRussiabut also of the whole world in the 20th century.

Hook attached great importance to accidents and contingencies in history,[29]thus opposing, among others,Herbert Fisher,[30]who made attempts to present history as "waves" of emergencies.

"Ethics of Controversy"

[edit]

In 1954, Hook published an essay titled "The Ethics of Controversy" in which he set down ten ground rules for democratic discourse within a democracy.[31][32]

Works

[edit]

Books

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Articles forNew Leader

[edit]

Hook's papers at Stanford[36]include the following articles:

  • "Where the News Ends" (November 26, 1938)
  • "John Deweyat Eighty "(October 28, 1939)
  • "Socialists Face Need of Unified Action" (March 9, 1940)
  • "Social Change and Original Sin" (November 8, 1941)
  • "Russia's Military Successes Do Not Whitewash Crimes at Home" (January 31, 1942)
  • "An Apologist for St. John's College" (November 25, 1944)
  • "The Degradation of the Word" (January 27, 1945)
  • "Freedom and Socialism: Reply toMax Eastman"(March 3, 1945)
  • "Reflections on the Nuremberg Trial: A Summary Court-Martial for Nazi Criminals" (November 17, 1945)
  • "Fin du Mondisme: The Birth of a New World Mood in Face of Atombomb" (January 23, 1946)
  • "An Unanswered Letter to theAmerican Jewish Congress"(July 5, 1947)
  • "Mr. Fly's Web of Confusions: An Analysis of a Befuddled Decision" (October 18, 1947)
  • "Mr. Fly Entangles Himself More Deeply" (November 22, 1947)
  • "The State: Servile or Free?" (March 13, 1948)
  • "John Dewey at Ninety: The Man and His Philosophy" (October 22, 1949)
  • "Communists in the Colleges" (May 6, 1950)
  • "Encounter in Berlin" (October 14, 1950)
  • "Russia by Moonshine" Part 1 (November 12, 1951)
  • "Russia by Moonshine" Part 2 (November 19, 1951)
  • "Is America in the Grip of Hysteria?" (Editorial reply toBertrand Russell) (March 3, 1952)
  • "Letter to an English Friend" (October 13, 1952)
  • "Fall of the Town of Usher", (October 27, 1952)
  • "Lattimoreon the Moscow Trials "(November 10, 1952)
  • "A Trans-Atlantic Dialogue" (December 8, 1952)
  • "Should We Stress Armaments or Political Warfare?" (February 23, 1953)
  • "Indoctrination and Academic Freedom" (March 9, 1953)
  • "Freedom in American Culture" (April 6, 1953)
  • "The Party Line in Psychology" (May 25, 1953)
  • "The Ethics of Controversy" (February 1, 1954)
  • "The Techniques of Controversy" (March 8, 1954)
  • "Robert HutchinsRides Again "(April 19, 1954)
  • "The Substance of Controversy" (May 24, 1954)
  • "Uncommon Sense about Security and Freedom" (June 21, 1954)
  • "The Ethics of Controversy Again" (January 16, 1956)
  • "The Strategy of Truth" February 13, 1956)
  • "Six Fallacies of Robert Hutchins" (March 19, 1956)
  • "Hutchins" (April 23, 1956)
  • "Prospects for Cultural Freedom" (May 7, 1956)
  • "The AAUP and Academic Integrity" (May 21, 1956)
  • "Academic Freedom" (June 4, 1956)
  • "Logic and the Fifth Amendment" (October 1, 1956)
  • "Psychology and the Fifth Amendment" (October 8, 1956)
  • "Ethics and the Fifth Amendment" (October 15, 1956)
  • "Politics and the Fifth Amendment" (October 22, 1956)
  • "Logic, History and Law" (November 5, 1956)
  • "Abraham Lincoln,American Pragmatist "(March 18, 1957)
  • "The Fifth Amendment: A Crucial Case" (April 22, 1957)
  • "The Atom and Human Wisdom" (June 3, 1957)
  • "The Old Liberalism: The New Conservative" (July 8, 1957)
  • "Marx, Dewey and Lincoln" (October 21, 1957)
  • "Justice Black's Illogic" (December 2, 1957)
  • "Pragmatism" (December 9, 1957)
  • "A Debate on Pragmatism: Marx, Dewey and Eastman" (February 10, 1958)
  • "A Foreign Policy for Survival" (April 7, 1958)
  • "A Free Man's Choice" (May 26, 1958)
  • "Bertrand Russell Retreats" (July 1958)
  • "Education in Japan" (November 24, 1958)

Occasional papers

[edit]
  • Lecture by Sidney Hook on "Freedom, Determinism and Sentimentality" (annual Horace M. Kallen Lectureship) (November 21, 1957)[37]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab Phelps, Christopher(1997).Young Sidney Hook: Marxist and Pragmatist.Cornell University Press. pp.33–34 (Katz), 51 (Katz), 128-129 (Katz), 132 (influence).ISBN0801433282.Retrieved14 October2018.
  2. ^ "New Palestine Party".New York Times.4 December 1948.Retrieved14 October2018.
  3. ^ Cotter, Matthew J. (29 December 2015)."Place and Profession in the Intellectual History of the City: Sidney Hook and NYU".Gotham Center.Retrieved14 October2018.
  4. ^ "Oppose Teachers' Oath".New York Times.9 April 1933. p. N3.Retrieved14 October2018.
  5. ^Michael Denning,The Cultural Front,New York City: Verso, 1997, p. 425ff
  6. ^Gordon, David (Fall 1998)."Letters of Sidney Hook".Ludwig von Mises Institute.Archived fromthe originalon 2007-07-17.Retrieved2016-03-18.
  7. ^John P. Diggins,Up From Communism,New York City: Columbia University Press, 1974, then Harper & Row, 1975, pp. 169-170.
  8. ^Diggins,Up From Communism,pp. 51-58.
  9. ^"Humanist Manifesto II".American Humanist Association. Archived fromthe originalon October 20, 2012.RetrievedOctober 18,2012.
  10. ^"The 'shocked' treatment".Washington Times.December 8, 2005.
  11. ^Coleman, Peter (1989).The Liberal Conspiracy: The Congress for Cultural Freedom and the Struggle for the Mind of Postwar Europe.New York: The Free Press. p. 49.
  12. ^ "On the Radio".New York Times.6 February 1953. p. 26.
  13. ^ Hook, Sidney(1953).Heresy, Yes–Conspiracy, No.John Day Company. pp.283.LCCN63006587.
  14. ^ Hook, Sidney(1952).Heresy, Yes–Conspiracy, No!.American Committee for Cultural Freedom. p. 29.LCCN52036000.
  15. ^ Hook, Sidney(1950)."Heresy, Yes–But Conspiracy, No!".New York Times.Retrieved3 September2018.
  16. ^"Book of Members, 1780-2010: Chapter H"(PDF).American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Retrieved19 April2011.
  17. ^"Jefferson Humanities Speech to Be Given by Sidney Hook,"TheNew York Times,December 26, 1983.
  18. ^Jefferson LecturersArchived2011-10-20 at theWayback Machineat NEH Web site (retrieved January 22, 2009).
  19. ^"The Heroism of Sidney Hook,"Archived2009-03-06 at theWayback MachineNational Review,June 15, 1984.
  20. ^Edward S. Shapiro, ed. (1995).Letters of Sidney Hook: democracy, communism, and the cold war.M.E. Sharpe. p. 2.ISBN9781563244872.This faith in rationality emerged early in Hook's life. Even before he was a teenager he proclaimed himself to be an agnostic. It was simply irrational, he declared, to believe in the existence of a merciful and powerful God in the face of widespread human misery. Only the pleadings of his parents that he not embarrass them in front of relatives and friends convinced Hook to participate in a Bar Mitzvah ceremony on his thirteenth birthday. People frequently asked him in his later years what he would say if he discovered after death that God really existed. He answered that he would simply state, "God, you never gave me enough evidence."
  21. ^ab Hook, Sidney (1995). Edward S. Shapiro (ed.).Letters of Sidney Hook: Democracy, Communism, and the Cold War.M.E. Sharpe. p. 15.
  22. ^ Meier, Andrew (August 11, 2008).The Lost Spy: An American in Stalin's Secret Service.W. W. Norton. pp.92–93.ISBN978-0-393-06097-3.
  23. ^"Scientific Facts and Fictions: On the Trail Of Paranormal Beliefs at CSICOP '84".The Skeptical Inquirer.9(3): 197. 1985.
  24. ^Sidney Hook,Out of Step,New York City: Harper & Row, chapters 5, 7, 23, 28, and 29, 1987.
  25. ^"The Pantheon of Skeptics".CSI.Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.Archivedfrom the original on 31 January 2017.Retrieved30 April2017.
  26. ^Hook, S.,The Hero in History: A Study in Limitation and Possibility.Boston, Masachuestts: Beacon Press, 1943, p. 116
  27. ^Grinin, Leonid,The Role of an Individual in History: A Reconsideration. Social Evolution and History,vol. 9, no. 2, 2010, pp. 95–136, 108.
  28. ^Professor Walter Earl Fluker Discusses Leadership, Obama and Civil Rights Pioneers"Professor Discusses Leadership, Obama and Civil Rights Pioneers".Archived fromthe originalon 2011-02-06.Retrieved2011-02-03.
  29. ^Hook, S.,The Hero in History: A Study in Limitation and Possibility,Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 1955, p. 142.
  30. ^Fisher, H., 1935.A History of Europe,vol. I, London, p. vii (reprint Fontana Press, 1984)
  31. ^"The Ethics of Controversy," New Leader, February 1, 1954, republished inSidney Hook on Pragmatism, Democracy and Freedom: The Essential Essays,(Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002), edited by Robert Talilsse and Robert Tempio, pp. 292-93.
  32. ^"Sid Hook's Ethics of Controversy | Prosperity Now".4 September 2007.
  33. ^ Hook, Sidney.Heresy, Yes; Conspiracy, No.New York: American Committee for Cultural Freedom. p. 29.LCCN52036000.
  34. ^ Hook, Sidney(October 1949)."Academic Integrity and Academic Freedom".Commentary.Retrieved14 October2018.
  35. ^ Hook, Sidney(9 September 1950)."Heresy, Yes—But Conspiracy, No".New York Times.p. 7.Retrieved2 September2018.
  36. ^ "Register of the Sidney Hook".Hoover Institution Archives.Retrieved14 October2018.
  37. ^ "Press Release: Lecture by Sidney Hook on" Freedom, Determinism and Sentimentality "".New School for Social Science. 21 November 1957.Retrieved14 October2018.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]