Jump to content

Siege of Ostend

Coordinates:51°14′N02°55′E/ 51.233°N 2.917°E/51.233; 2.917
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the siege during the Dutch Revolt. For later sieges, seeSiege of Ostend (1706)andSiege of Ostend (1745).

Siege of Ostend
Part of theEighty Years' War& theAnglo–Spanish War

Siege of Ostend
byPeter Snayers,oil on canvas.
Date5 July 1601 – 20 September 1604
Location
Ostend(present-dayBelgium)
51°14′N02°55′E/ 51.233°N 2.917°E/51.233; 2.917
Result PyrrhicSpanish victory[Note A]
Territorial
changes		 Ostend annexed bySpanish Netherlands
Belligerents
Dutch RepublicUnited Provinces
EnglandEngland
ScotlandScotland		 Spanish Empire
Commanders and leaders
Dutch RepublicCharles van der Noot(July 1601)
EnglandFrancis Vere(August 1601)
Dutch RepublicFrederick van Dorp(March 1602)
Dutch RepublicPeter van Gieselles(Dec 1603)†
Dutch RepublicJohn van Loon (March 1604)†
Dutch RepublicJacques van der Meer (March 1604)†
Dutch RepublicCoronel Uytenhoove (June 1604) (WIA)
Dutch RepublicDaniel d´HertaingSurrendered		 SpainArchduke Albrecht(July 1601)
SpainAmbrosio Spinola(October 1603)
SpainLuis de Velasco
SpainCount of Bucquoy
SpainFrederik van den Bergh
Strength
2,500–8,000 (peak)
Total: ~50,000 (by rotation)[Note B]		 9,000–20,000 (peak)
Total: ~80,000 (by rotation)[1]
Casualties and losses
30,000[2]– 45,000[3]killed, wounded or succumbed to disease
3,000 surrendered[4][5]		 60,000[2]– 70,000[6][7]killed, wounded or succumbed to disease

TheSiege of Ostendwas a three-yearsiegeof the city ofOstendduring theEighty Years' Warand theAnglo–Spanish War.ASpanishforce underArchduke Albrechtbesieged the fortress being held initially by aDutchforce which was reinforced byEnglishtroops underFrancis Vere,who became the town's governor.[8]It was said "the Spanish assailed the unassailable; the Dutch defended the indefensible."[9][10]The commitment of both sides in the dispute over the only Dutch-ruled area in the province ofFlanders,made the campaign continue for more than any other during the war. This resulted in one of the longest and bloodiest sieges in world history: more than 100,000 people were killed, wounded, or succumbed to disease during the siege.[3]

Ostend was resupplied via the sea and as a result held out for three years.[11]A garrison did a tour of duty before being replaced by fresh troops, normally 3,000 at a time keeping casualties and disease to a minimum.[12]The siege consisted of a number of assaults by the Spanish, including a massive unsuccessful assault by 10,000 Spanish infantry in January 1602 when governed by Vere.[13]After suffering heavy losses, the Spanish replaced the Archduke withAmbrosio Spinolaand the siege settled down to one ofattritionwith the strong points gradually being taken one at a time.[4]

Ostend was eventually captured by the Spanish on 20 September 1604 but the city was completely destroyed and the overall strategy had changed since the siege had started.[4][14]The loss of Ostend was a severe blow strategically for the Republic but Spanish propaganda and strategic objectives were frustrated by the Dutch and Englishconquest of Sluisto the northeast a few weeks before the surrender of Ostend.[15][16]In addition, the economic cost of such a long campaign and the enormous number of casualties sustained turned the result into a Spanishpyrrhic victory[17][18]and effectively the siege contributed largely to Spanishbankruptcythree years later which was followed by theTwelve Years' Truce.[19][20]

Background

[edit]

In 1568, during the reign ofPhilip II of Spain,the Netherlands, until then under the rule of the Spanish Empire, took up arms against the Spanish crown.[21]The first phase of the war began with two unsuccessful invasions of the provinces by mercenary armies under PrinceWilliam I of Orange(1568 and 1572) and foreign-based raids by theGeuzenor Sea Beggars, (irregular Dutch land and sea forces).[22]By the end of 1573 the Beggars had captured the bulk of the provinces of Holland andZeelandas well as converted the populace toCalvinism,and secured against Spanish attack. The other provinces joined in the revolt in 1576, and ageneral unionwas formed.[23]

Map of Flanders in the 17th century

In 1579 the union was fatally weakened by the defection of the RomanCatholicWalloonprovinces in theUnion of Arras.[24]By 1588 the Spanish, underAlexander Farnese, Duke of Parma,had reconquered the southern Low Countries leaving only Ostend as a major rebel enclave along the coast and stood poised for a death blow against the nascent Dutch Republic in the north.[25]Spain's concurrent enterprises against England and France at this time, however, allowed the Republic to begin a highly successful counter-offensive underMaurice of Orangewhich lasted from 1590–1600, known as theTen Glory Years.[26][27]

In 1599 the Archduke Albert of Austria andIsabel Clara Eugenia,brother and sister ofPhilip III,ruled as jointsovereignsof the Netherlands through the will of the dying Philip II.[28]By 1600 Maurice of Nassau wasstadtholderandJohan van OldenbarneveltwasGrand pensionaryof theStates General of the Netherlands.[11]

In 1601, Spain, now under King Philip III with hisfavouritetheDuke of Lerma,despite maintaining its hegemony in the world, was economically weakened with war and bankruptcy.[29]Starting with the bankruptcy of the Royal Treasury in 1575; operations against theOttomansin theMediterranean,thirty years of war inFlandersagainst the rebel forces of theUnited Provincesand a war with England which had waged from 1585.[7]Spain had also only just finished a costly and unsuccessfulwar with France.[24]The wars were a great burden for the Spanish Empire and meant that financially Spain depended entirely on the treasure fleet brought from the colonies.[7]Nevertheless, Philip pursued a highly aggressive set of policies, aiming to deliver a 'great victory' against both Holland and England.[30]The situation of the United Provinces was similar; more than thirty years of war, and foreign trade blocked by Spain had caused a financial drain. The Dutch tried to relieve their precarious finances by commercially expanding into theEast Indieswith the birth of theDutch East India Company(VOC).[31]England was in the same position and was fighting nowin Ireland.[24]Like the Dutch they too had just set up their ownEast India Company.[31]

In 1600 the Dutch and English Army under the command of Maurice of Nassau and Francis Vere respectively used Ostend as a base to invade Flanders, in an attempt to conquer the city ofDunkirkafter their victory in theBattle of Nieuwpoort.[32]This never happened however as disputes in the Dutch command meant that taking Spanish-occupied cities in the rest of the Netherlands took over priority as the opportunity arose.[33]Maurice concurred and had his forces evacuated by sea leaving Ostend to be preoccupied by the Spanish.[12]

Ostend

[edit]

Founded five hundred years earlier, the city of Ostend (translated into English meaning East – End) in the mid-16th century was a fishing village of about 3,000 inhabitants.[11]Ostend's strategic position in the province of West Flanders, along the North Sea and accessible to Dutch sea power, was fortified by the Dutch and English between 1583 and 1590, and turned into a major military port.[34]In the view of the State of Flanders; Ostend in the hands of the Protestant Dutch and English was a huge thorn in their side.[35]Ostend unlike other places in the Netherlands had never been taken by the Spanish and the garrison had even repelled an attack by Parma in 1583.[33]In 1587, during preparations for the invasion of England by theSpanish Armada,Parma had rejected the idea of a conquest of Ostend by considering it a reckless enterprise after thecapture of Sluis.[36]The garrison had also made frequent incursions into the adjacent country.[33]Ostend was the only possession of the Dutch Republic in Flanders and its capture was of strategic importance for the Spanish.[24]

Defenses

[edit]
A very detailed map from 1641 on the positions of Ostend during the siege byJoan Blaeu

The reason why Parma was so cautious to attack was not just for its defences, but also its place right near the sea.[12][37]The old church and town faced the seas, but in 1583 the new town, further inland, was fortified withramparts,counterscarps,and two broad ditches.[24]The dunes were cut away, and the sea was allowed to fill the ditches and surround the town.[14]A canal called theGeulehad begun to form a new harbour on the east side; it was wide, deep, and navigable and served the maritime traffic to the city.[11]To the south a framework of often flooded streams and wetlands would have made the area difficult to place heavy siege guns.[12]Where the land rose slightly towards the dunes, on either side of the town; the besiegers would be able to approach with their parallels andbatteriesand as such were vulnerable points.[37]

On the West side of Ostend another canal, theOld Haven,was more of a defensivemoatwhich was barely navigable but could not be easily waded except for four hours at low tide.[37]A ditch passed between the old and new towns, which were connected by bridges, and round the new town, parallel to theGeuleon one side, and to the old harbour and Yperlet stream on the other.[14]TheGueleitself had ramparts andbulwarkson one side, and a counter scarp withravelinson the other, while the water level for both canals could be adjusted from thelocklocated in the city.[12]

In the old town, closer to the mouth of the old harbour, afortcalled theSandhillhad been constructed. The old town was protected by strongpalisadesformingbastionswith connectingcurtains,and a succession of three small forts; theSchottenburgh(next to theSand-hill), theMoses Table,and theFlamenburgall defending a cut from the town ditch into theGeule,at the eastern corner.[12]On the eastern side of the town facing theGeule,the defences consisted of a range of bulwarks (or bastions)North Bulwark,East BulwarkorPekell,Spanish Bulwarkat the southeast angle, with anoutworkcalled theSpanish Half-moon.[35]To the South and West an extensive outwork, thePolder,which had formerly been a field from which the water had been pumped by means ofwindmillsnear the point where the Yperlet stream flowed into the old harbour.[14]Flanking thePolderat both points were theSouth bulwarkand theWest bulwark,in front of each were two further outworks; the inner stronger Polder, South and West Bulwark's which then linked the Polder, South and West Ravelins. This then linked to the Polder, South and West square's; Ostend's most outer defensive works.[14]

At the northwest angle, near the mouth of the fordable old harbour, the walls consisted of a strong ravelin in the counter scarp called thePorcepic,and abastionin its rear known by the name of theHelmund.[14][38]This was considered the most important area to defend as an attempt on the walls could be made on firm ground.[11][12]

The north area was open to the sea, where Ostend could receive reinforcements and supplies during the high tide.[35][36]

Forces

[edit]
Archduke of Austria

Armies during this period of warfare utilizedpikes,arquebuses,swords,daggers,rudimentary (and unpredictable) explosives; early forms ofhand grenadesas well asartillery.[37]As there were more wounded than deaths in battle,amputationswere the common solution for treating wounds. At this time poor sanitation spread infections and fever, causing more deaths than combat itself.[37]

Thetercios,the regiments of the Spanish army, were regarded at the time as the elite of the militarycorps,and were key to Spain's European hegemony in the 16th century and the first half of the seventeenth century, and are seen by historians as a major development of early modern combined arms warfare.[38]The quality of their organization and strict discipline made them efficient but certain circumstances such as long delays in pay sometimes escalated into violent mutinies.[39]The tercios consisted of recruited soldiers of all domains of the SpanishHabsburg empire;Spaniards,Portuguese,Italians,Germans,Walloons,Swiss,Burgundiansloyal to Spain, anddissidentCatholicIrish,along withmercenariesfrom other countries.[40]They were led by the Archduke Albrecht who was military commander of the Spanish forces in the Low Countries.[7]

The defending forces of Ostend were the army of the United Provinces, reorganized byMaurice of Nassauwho also played a part in the development of early modern warfare. The Dutch had large support from their Protestant ally England whose pike men and arquebusiers were clad in redcassocks(amongst the earliest Englishredcoats).[41][42]The English, having distinguished themselves highly in battles such asTurnhoutand Nieupoort where they had faced and beaten the Spanish tercios, were considered the veterans, and the elite of the army as a whole.[14][43]They did have a reputation however as being thieves, pillaging friend and foe alike during and after battle.[38]Other Protestant troops from Scotland, France, and Germany took their side amongst Maurice's army.[35]

Siege

[edit]

On 5 July 1601, the Archduke Albert opened the siege of Ostend with 12,000 men and 50 siege-guns in position; while the small garrison of under 2,000 was commanded by GovernorCharles van der Noot.[14]The States General held that the defence of this outlying post was a matter of vital importance.[44]With this in mind they looked round for the ablest commander in their service.[45]Sir Francis Vere, the hero of Nieuwpoort, was chosen not as governor, but as general of the army along with ample powers.[33]

The Spanish besiegers soon rose to 20,000, a number which was one of the Archduke's preliminary objectives.[45]As the Spanish cannonaded the city, some soldiers tried to wade the moat but this failed and a number drowned.[44]TheCount of Bucquoy,commanding forces east of Ostend, had been unable to do the same due over Geule, and began the construction of adikefrom the sea up to the city; artillery was placed with which to fire at the boats coming and going from the North.[14]These works were constantly interrupted by the rising sea, evolving under fire from the city and in addition the superiority of the Dutch and English at sea.[35]In addition, the failure of the Spanish closing the north side of Ostend enabled it to receive reinforcements and supplies.[11]

Vere first proceeded to England to obtain the approval of Queen Elizabeth, and to raise a body of recruits – these were subsequently raised inEast Angliawhile some werepressedinto service inLondon.[46]Vere's brotherHoracewas detached from Maurice's army with eight Englishcompaniesto reinforce the Ostend garrison.[14][32]

Arrival of Vere

[edit]

On 9 July, Sir Francis landed with these troops on the sands opposite Ostend.[47]Van der Noot met him at the water's edge, and delivered up the keys of Ostend.[37]The garrison then consisted of thirty companies of Netherlanders in two regiments of 2,600 men to which Vere added his eight companies of 100 men each, which brought up the total to 3,500 men.[14]Another 1,500 English troops underEdward Cecilarrived on 23 July to build up the garrison.[42]

On 27 July English troops led by Edward Cecil made a sortie and gained a large segment of trenches from the Spanish whom they put to flight; pursuing them to the sand hills with support from the town's artillery.[42]Casualties inflicted were heavy; around 600 including many prisoners. Amongst the killed was Don Diego Idiaquez, son of a formersecretary of stateto Philip II.[42]

On 4 August the Spaniards kept up a tremendous fire on the town from all their batteries, and Sir Francis Vere was severely wounded in the head.[47]Vere went toMiddelburgto be treated for his wound, and in a few weeks he wasconvalescent.[44]In September he returned to Ostend along with more recruits from Holland, England, and Scotland.[48]

Meanwhile, the fire from the besiegers continued and the soldiers of the garrison dug underground quarters in the marketplace near the "Pekel" bastion, for protection against the hail of shot.[33][49]

Siege of Ostend,Sebastian Vrancx

The States General at this time demanded that Maurice should march to relieve the city; to take on the besiegers.[45]Vere was himself frustrated at both the lack of Dutch response from the States General and from Maurice; particularly when a few veteran companies including Edward Cecil's, were taken out of Ostend to join Maurice's forces back in the field.[42][50]

Maurice however knowing the futility in making a direct attack, chose to campaign in the surrounding areas in an attempt to block the Spanish supplies and divert the attention of the besiegers.[51]He laid siege to andretook Rheinbergand then continued to Spanish-heldMeursin August which was also captured.[45]Maurice hoped to take's-Hertogenboschbut plans for thesiege were cancelledand so withdrew to winter quarters.[49]

The spy

[edit]

Albert had taken on a traitor; a Catholic Englishman by the name of Conisby, who went to England and then procured letters to Vere before he crossed over to Ostend.[52]He began to convey intelligence to the besiegers under an agreement with Albert.[53]A boat was sunk in the mud, on the banks of theOld haven,near theSouth square;Conisby was to deposit letters there from which a Spanish soldier then took them during the night. Conisby however grew bolder, and tried to bribe a sergeant to blow up the powder magazine.[54]The sergeant revealed the plot and Conisby confessed to everything, and was sentenced to be publicly executed but in an act of clemency was whipped out of the town.[52][55]

Assault on theSandhill&South Bulwark

[edit]

In December 1601 the number of defenders of the garrison was down to less than 3,000 but the besiegers suffered terribly and had only 8,000 men fit for duty out of 25,000.[56]

For the first six months and generally throughout the siege there were fired on average a thousand shots a day.[57]It was not until the end of November that the Spaniards had been at work advancing their batteries, forming foundations in the haven by sinking huge baskets of wicker-work filled with sand, and building floating platforms, on which guns were mounted in the "Geule".[58]

On 4 December a breach was made in between thePorcespicand theHelmundand the Archduke was prepared to storm.[56]

Vere made sure it was heavily guarded and placed SirJohn Ogle's company there but was awoken by the alarm and rushed to the ramparts to discover the Spanish were assaulting the breach.[58]A force of 3 – 4,000 Spanish attempted to storm the position; thephalanxof Spanish pikemen managed to gain the breach but were forced out by a counterattack.[47]The Spanish then launched further attacks but were repelled again.[56]A fierce struggle ensued, and the besiegers were driven back while Vere ordered wisps of straw to be set alight and fixed on the ends of the pikes, so that the retreating Spaniards might be fired upon with effect as they fell back.[59]The assault never made it past the breach as the Spanish found the rubble almost impossible to fight on and suffered heavy casualties.[56]In the end the attack was a disaster and after half an hour the Spanish had lost over 500 men, nearly a quarter of the attacking force.[57][58]

Parley stratagem

[edit]

The position in Ostend by the turn of winter was perilous; after nearly five and a half months siege and after two months without reinforcements.[50]Furthermore, the outer works such as thePolderhad to be temporarily abandoned because of storms and exposed icy conditions.[60]

Spanish troops at Ostend

On 23 December, Vere learned from a deserter that the Spanish were in preparation for a large impending assault on the city; he realized he had no hope except to hold for time.[58]Vere's frustration with the Dutch continued, writing many letters and complaining about the lack of support, in addition he demanded reinforcements.[50]He therefore proposed aparleyto the Spaniards for negotiations; but this was a ploy hoping to gain time to await the arrival of the reinforcements.[47][58]The Spanish accepted and Vere sent two of his captains, John Ogle andCharles Fairfax,as hostages to the Spanish camp, while the Spanish sent in return Mateo Antonio,quartermastergeneral of the Spanish army, andMatteo Serrano,Governor of Sluis, to negotiateterms of possible surrender.[58][61]

Vere then construed as much time as possible frustrating Spanish 'negotiations'; he ordered his men tobeat to quarterseven though there was no attack.[58][60]Vere then expressed anger at Serrano and Antonio as to why the Spanish had intended to attack and then refused to speak with them.[62]Vere then ordered them to stay put because of the dark and high tide, andflagonsof Englishalewere given as compensation.[58]The next day they arrived back at Albert's headquarters; but he immediately sent them back.[61]While all this was going on vital repair work was carried out on the defences.[50]

Negotiations had been held off for twenty-four hours and Vere stated that the incident was a total misunderstanding and apologized.[62]Vere told Serrano and Antonio that the archduke mustwithdraw from Ostendorsurrender his forces;the reply was the Archduke was to see the surrender of the town.[56]Vere then broke off the discussions again and both were invited to abanquetas it was Christmas Eve which they accepted with more time wasted.[59]

Rumours began to circulate outside that Ostend had fallen and the Archduke and Isabella had dressed in their best to await the surrender.[62]In the town however both Serano and Antonio were about to resume talks but during the night three ships arrived with 600 Zeelanders as reinforcements.[56]Vere's plan had worked, after which, he immediately broke off all negotiations.[50]The Spanish, in particular the archduke, were outraged; reluctantly they released Ogle and Fairfax once Serrano and Antonio had returned.[61]Albert refused to see any of his generals for several days blaming them for recommending to call off the assault and allowing the negotiations to go ahead.[62]

1602

[edit]
Sir Francis Vere

In early January two of the besieging batteries, consisting of eighteen cannon, sent balls of forty to forty-six pounds weight, which kept up a crushing fire on thePorcespic,HelmundandSandhill.[63]The Spaniards had by that time sent 163,200 shot into the town, and scarcely a whole house was left standing.[64]Several houses, which had been ruined by the cannon fire, were pulled down for the sake of the beams and spars to be used aspalisades.[65]

Great Spanish Assault

[edit]

Vere soon after received intelligence from deserters and scouts that the Spanish were preparing for a general assault; and began to prepare for it.[66]

Preparations

[edit]

At high tide, Vere shut the westsluice,which let the water into the town ditch from the Old haven in the rear of "Helmund", in order to retain as much water as possible.[67]Horace Vere and Charles Fairfax, with 12 companies armed with pikes and muskets, were stationed in the "Sand-hill".[68]Vere took his stand with six of his veteran English and Scots companies close by.[65]Two more companies, one English and one Dutch, occupied theSchottenburghredoubt and from there to the destroyed church were 300 Zeelanders who had arrived on the 26th.[67]Ten Dutch companies occupied positions from the church, "Moses Table", North ravelin, and "Flamenburgh", while four large guns protected the harbour and the old town.[63]

The two most important works, flanking the breach, the "Porcespic" and the "Helmund", held ten Dutch and English companies along with nine guns loaded withgrape shot.[64][66]In the "West Bulwark" twodemi-culverinswere placed to sweep the old haven.[63]Along the curtain of the old town, and on the breach which had been made under the "Sandhill", stones and bricks from the ruins of the old church, hoops bound withsquibs,fireworks,ropes ofpitch,and hand-grenades were ready to be poured on the attackers.[65][66]

By the evening the Spanish army had marshalled for a huge assault and were seen bringing down scaling ladders and ammunition.[66]Count Farnese, with 2,000 Spanish and Italian troops, were ordered to attack the "Sandhill" and thecurtainof the old town wall.[67]The governor ofDixmunde,with 2,000 Spaniards, was to assault "Helmund" and thePorcespic;a force of 500 men was to scale the west ravelin, while a similar number attacked the "South Square".[66]On the east side Count Bucquoy was to deliver an assault, specially attacking the east ravelin and the defences of the new haven; in all the assault totalled some 10,000 men.[63]

Assault

[edit]

Vere ordered his engineers to get on the breach to rapidly throw up a small breastwork, driving inpalisades.[63]The Archduke fired a gun as a signal to Bucquoy, and the besiegers rushed to the assault from all points just as the darkness of night set in.[59]Vere's engineers immediately discovered Count Farnese wading across with his 2,000 Italians, and drawing them up in battalions on the Ostend side.[68][69]Vere then went to the top of the "Sandhill" and issued orders to have everything in readiness, but not to fire until he gave the signal, and then to open with both ordnance and small shot.[67]

Depiction showing the huge Spanish assault of 7 January 1602

As the Spanish approached ever closer Vere at once ordered a heavy fire on to the Spanish battalions heading towards the foot of the "Sandhill".[70]Along the curtain of the old town, the Spaniards rushed into the breach but as they climbed up they were met by ordnance fire from the bulwarks. Burning ash, stones, and rubble were hurled at them, before the flaming hoops were cast.[69][71]The Spanish no sooner climbed to the crest of the "Sandhill" and the "Schottenburgh" but were repelled three times with heavy losses after rallying to the charge, while the struggle on the breach continued during the space of an hour.[59][65]

Similar assaults were made on theWestern ravelin,and on the "South Square", while on the east side three strong battalions of the Spanish were formed on the margin of the "Geule".[69]They then attacked the "Spanish Half-moon" outwork which was taken after heavy fighting.[61]Vere ordered its recovery and heavy fire was opened from the bulwarks and then an English company drove them out with a loss of 300 men, mostly captured.[70]

By midnight the Spanish were repulsed at all points having suffered heavily in the assault[59]and were milling about in the ford in confusion.[71]Vere saw an opportunity he could not miss, and ordered the west sluice to be opened, through which the waters that had been stored in the town ditch and had been closed at high tide now rushed down the haven in a huge torrent while the Spanish were wading across.[69]The damage inflicted by this torrent was tremendous and carried many of the assailants away into the sea.[61]

Once the waters had subsided the defenders then launched a counterattack, poured over the walls and secured an immense amount of plunder.[70]The Spanish retreated in complete disorder throwing away everything they had. The English were first into the fray; Spanish pistols, priest's cassocks, swords, gold chains, pendants, and enamelled shields were all taken from the dead and dying.[70]There were heaps of Spanish and Italian dead under the "Sandhill" and along the wall of the old town, amidst broken siege equipment.[65]Among the dead and wounded was the discovery of a young Spanish girl in male attire, who had fallen in the assault and under her dress was a chain of gold set with precious stones, along with other jewels and silver.[64][69]

Aftermath

[edit]

Casualties from the assault were enormous; between 1,500 and 2,000 soldiers were killed, wounded, drowned, or captured,[71]which at the time represented at least a quarter of the whole besieging army.[69]Many noblemen, chiefs, and commanders were killed or missing; the extremely wealthy Italian Count d'Imbero was slain by an English private soldier of Fairfax's company; so too was Don Durango Maistro del Campo, also known as Colonel Don Alvarez Suarez (Knight of theOrder of Santiago), the hostage during the parley Colonel Simon Antonio and the Lieutenant Governor of Antwerp.[72][73]The loss of the garrison was forty killed and 100 wounded;[59]Horace Vere was wounded in the leg with a splinter while two captains and four other officers were killed.[68][70]

After the failure of this assault, many of the Spanish soldiers mutinied to protest the high number of casualties and no gains, blaming their commanders for having led them to certain death.[69]Albert however took no sympathy and ordered the ringleaders, of which there were several, executed.[71]

Departure of Vere

[edit]

The besiegers had had enough supplies and food to last them for some time and Vere remained for a few months longer, when he was called away by the States General to assume an important command in the field. Vere's parley in December was met with muted criticism however but the repulse of the assault had overshadowed this.[74]Vere left Ostend on 7 March, accompanied by his brother Horace and John Ogle as well as the majority of his English companies,[68][75]but the remaining English troops continued to fight for the Dutch until the end.[76]Colonel Zelandés Frederic van Dorp, the new governor, arrived with a fresh rotation of eight Dutch and Frisian companies and by June more reinforcements put the garrison at 5,000 men in total.[35][77]

In July 1602 Maurice launched an offensive, who after being joined by Francis Verebesieged Grave.[76]A slow siege was conducted and after forcing away a Spanish relief attempt took the surrender of the town on 18 September, and continued their advance throughBrabant.[78]

There were no more assaults on Ostend throughout the rest of 1602, but there was an outbreak ofpestilenceduring the summer for both armies causing loss of life and disease.[79]Another thirty six Dutch infantry companies arrived in November 1602 on a rotation replacing those who had stayed the longest.[78]Spanish attempts to prevent the passage of the ships entering Ostend by bombardment failed.[77]The Spanish had built a large platform near the Western dunes and contented themselves with bombarding the town from there.[72]

On the last day of the year in 1602 a huge fleet arrived with provisions to last many more months and again the Spanish failed to stop the ships entering.[74]The relief included cows, sheep, wine, bread, and other foodstuffs enough to supply one of the largest cities in Europe.[80]As a result, the market provisions were cheaper in Ostend than any other place in Europe at the time.[81]

1603

[edit]
Siege of Ostend, Braun & Hogenberg

The siege continued on in 1603 with both sides exchanging artillery; in the first few months the Spanish had unsuccessfully tried again to stop Ostend from being provisioned by Dutch and English ships.[68]

Diplomacy

[edit]

Queen Elizabeth I died in March 1603, and the subsequent succession ofJames Iled to diplomatic talks.[82]Both the ambassadors of Spain,Juan de Acuña TassisandJuan Fernández de Velasco,congratulated the new monarch but also hoped to seek truces and mutual good faith.[83]James at the same time discouraged the levy of English soldiers to help defend Ostend and declared a ceasefire at sea, in an effort to start peace talks with Spain. The ascension of James I to power effectively ended the Anglo-Spanish war, but this didn't deter English soldiers fighting for the United Provinces.[84]John Ogle, who had been knighted at Woodstock in 1603, continued to recruit English troops to send to Flanders. He would later become the commander of the English forces at Ostend the same year.[85]Meanwhile, Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, heading the delegation of the States, tried to attract the complicity of the new English monarch in the conflict in Flanders, of which the focus was Ostend.[75]

England's answer would not be effective until the signing of theTreaty of London of 1604,in which England and Spain made peace, agreeing not to assist the Dutch rebels.[7]However, as a way to implement honor, the clause of the treaty would only take place once the siege of Ostend ended, with English and Scottish troops still both active in the field fighting with Maurice and in the garrison itself.[59][82]

Assault on thePorcespic& theSquares

[edit]

On the night of 13 April 1603 a storm raged and tides were dangerously high causing more damage in the town and on the defences.[86]As soon as the storm had passed away the Spanish launched another attack, this time on the "Porcespic" by a force of nearly 8,000 Spanish and Italians.[80]The position though was well defended by a mixture of Dutch, English, and Scots and the attackers were repelled despite managing to gain a foothold on the ramparts.[59][79]

The attack on the redoubt had been a feint however; the Spaniards were at that very moment swarming all over the three external forts, theSouth Square,theWest Square,and thePolder Square.[87]The Spanish had planted rope-ladders, swung themselves over the walls while the fight had been going on at thePorcespic.[86]The three positions were in the hands of the Spanish by the time the fight at thePorcespicwas over.[80]Dorp did his best to rally the fugitives, and to encourage those who had remained.[87]The next day the Spaniards consolidated their new positions and they turned the newly captured guns upon the main counterscarp of the town. The cost had been heavy on both sides, around fifteen hundred were casualties – besiegers and besieged- during the assault.[86]

Despite the loss, the besieged strengthened their inner works making sure the Spanish did not exploit the success.[87]The conclusion that another assault had failed despite the capture of the squares had been costly.[80]By taking them at heavy cost and over a long period of time and with more positions to take, some in the Spanish camp began to doubt the military effectiveness of the Archduke and it was decided to replace him as commander in the field.[86][87]

The Spinolas

[edit]
Ambrogio Spinola who replaced the archduke

Genoese brothers Federico andAmbrosio Spinolaoffered their services to the King of Spain:Federico Spinolahad arrived at the Spanish court inValladolid,where Philip III made available to him sixgalleys,with which he was to go toSluisin a potential for galley borne invasion of England as well as a blockade of Ostend.[88]His fleet of galleys thoughwas attackedby the English atSesimbraBay losing two galleys, and with the remaining six sailed towards Sluis butwas defeatedby an Anglo-Dutch squadron in the English Channel losing another three.[89]Frederico would be defeated again and killed ina final battle off Sluiswith the Dutch a year later ending any dream of Ostend being blockaded, let alone England invaded.[90]

Meanwhile, Ambrosio Spinola, together with theCount of Fuentes,governor ofMilan,recruited 8,000 men in Italy.[91]These were at the expense of their own assets and lending byGenoesebankers, who proceeded to Ostend to reinforce the troops of the Archduke.[92]

After two years of campaigning, Archduke Albert's progress in the siege were scarce: attempts to attack the Old Haven in the west had not had the desired result, and the dike held by Bucquoy in the east had failed stop the boats from entering the city harbour.[79]The only positions captured were the three external squares but the siege by this time had been enormously costly in terms of money and troops.[91][93]

In October 1603, Ambrosio Spinola succeeded the Archduke in the command of the Spanish forces.[91]This replacement initially raised some doubts amongst the commanders since the Genoese aristocrat had very little military experience beyond the study of appropriate books.[94]However, in the field his relations with the soldiers and commanders of theArmy of Flanderswere soon appreciated; his personal involvement in the conflict and charismatic personality serving as an incentive to the troops.[92]He improved morale and hoped to introduce innovative and inventive ways to take Ostend.[95]One of these was an inventor;Pompeo Targone,a Venetian engineer in the service of the Pope who devised and constructed a number of devices.[92]

The Dutch command also changed; Charles van der Noot was replaced due to ill health byPeter van Giesellesin late 1603.[80]

1604

[edit]

Attrition

[edit]

Ambrosio Spinola hoped to avoid the bloody and futile full-scale assaults of his predecessor and instead had his troops provided with a system of field fortification works that slowly advanced towards the northwestern part of Ostend.[96]Although this procedure was costly, it proved to be successful for the Spanish.[95]

He ordered troops to throw up causeways of earth and fascines across the Yperlet stream which was shielded by constructedgabions.[95]The inventions were not helping the Spanish however as Targone's mobiledrawbridgemounted on four ten-foot wheels was damaged and immobilized by a single cannon shot; it was then destroyed by more fire from the besieged after which it was abandoned.[92]

Between February and March 1604 the city was badly damaged by severe storms and the Spanish continued to dig trenches ever closer and began constructing amineunderPorcepiscand theWest Bulwark.[96]

On 12 March the Spanish launched a determined effort to carry thelesser Polder bulwark.The little fort was soon overwhelmed and the defenders were at last driven out of it and forced to take refuge in the next work; the first attrition success had been registered for Spinola.[97]Gieselles was killed soon after observing the captured position, and was succeeded by Colonel John van Loon, who died just four days later by the impact of a cannonball, his provisional substitute Jacques de Bievry was wounded and evacuated to Zealand.[79]

Jacob van der Meer was next to be appointed as commander of Ostend 1 April, but the next day thePolder ravelinwas assaulted by the Spanish.[96]In a bloody action lasting many hours the position was taken but again the cost had been heavy, the defenders were all killed and very few escaped.[97]

On 18 April Spinola ordered another assault this time on theWestern ravelin.After a hand to hand action in which great numbers of officers and soldiers were lost on both sides, the fort was eventually carried.[96]This was an important success for the Spanish who had now worked their way with galleries and ditches along the whole length of the counterscarp till they were nearly up with thePorcepsic.[97]Soon after the Spanish assaulted the mainPorcepsicitself but were repelled with further losses, but despite this Spinola then undertook a formal siege of theenceinte.[96]

Siege of Sluis

[edit]
Further information:Siege of Sluis (1604)

Maurice received the news of the capture of theWestandPolder ravelinswith astonishment and harboured first fears about the fate of Ostend. He decided to launch an attack at either Ostend or Sluis; the latter was chosen hoping to draw out the Spanish or to capture Sluis, an inland port similar to Ostend as a backup plan.[75][98]

Maurice and his cousin William Louis of Nassau, at the head of a Dutch and English army of 11,000 rising to 18,000 men entered Flanders in April 1604, and laid siege to Sluis on 25 April.[99]Luis de Velasco, General of the Spanish horse, and later Spinola himself attempted to come to the aid of the city but Maurice's forces stood firm and defeated both Velasco and Spinola.[1]As a result, they could not prevent its loss on 19 August, when the governor of the cityMateo Serranosurrendered to the Dutch and English.[98]

New Troy

[edit]
Jacob Van der Meer who created theNew Troy

As a result of the threat that the old counterscarp could be taken or demolished, van der Meer ordered a new one built.[96]A plan for this work had already been sent into the place, and the distinguished English engineer Ralph Dexter arrived with his assistants to carry out the heavy task. He estimated that the labour would take three weeks.[100]The new defensive positions would cut the town in two and whole foundations of houses reduced to rubble by the bombardment were removed.[97]

Meer was told there was a lack of earth so he ordered dead bodies from both sides to be used to shore up the ramparts of this final refuge; heads and bones were used like fascines but they could not offer adequate resistance to cannon fire.[97]Nova Troia:meaningNew TroyorLittle Troywas bestowed on the last entrenchment of the besieged since they announced that they would hold out there for as long as the ancientTrojans had defended Ilium.[92][101]The new defences were named after old ones includingNew Helmund,New PolderandNew West Bulwark.[100]

By 11 May the Spanish had effected a lodgement in a corner of thePorcepsicand from that point would threaten the new counterscarp before it could be completed.[96]Van der Meer warned the Hague that the garrison was close to exhaustion and was not sure how long he could sustain the defence of the main rampart. He died shortly after however by a musket wound; his position would be taken by Colonel Uytenhoove.[68][95]

On 29 May the long prepared mine was sprung effectively beneath thePorepsic.[102]The Spanish then launched a two-pronged assault, one on the breach and the other on thePolderbulwark.[103]The Spanish soon crowded into the breach and ferocious fighting ensued. After a long and desperate struggle with heavy losses on both sides thePorepsicwas at last carried and held by the Spanish. However, the assault on thePolderbulwark was repelled and further attempts to take the position were called off.[99]

On 2 June the mine which he had constructed beneath thePolderbulwark was sprung. A breach forty feet wide was made and the Spanish launched another assault and leaped into the crater.[102]Emerging from the crater and carrying the Polder at last to their surprise were new defences. The besiegers had worked out where the mine was being dug, withdrew from thePolder,and built a new set of defences (known as the New Polder) directly behind with flanking batteries for the impending assault.[103]The musketeers and pikemen protected by their new works were ready and after giving heavy fire then counterattacked towards the shocked and confused assailants.[75]After they reeled back from a brief but severe struggle, the Spanish retreated suffering yet more heavy losses.[102]Spinola called off further assaults for two weeks while the work on another mine under the Western bulwark continued but he knew that he had to take Ostend before Maurice could take Sluis.[101]On 7 June, further reinforcements arrived at the stronghold – five companies in all: two English, two Scottish, and one fromFriesland,all of them under the command of Charles Fairfax.[104]

Daniel d´Hertaing

On 17 June the Spanish sprang the mine under the Western bulwark.[103]The assailants attacked the breach and were met again by heavy fire from the besieged with Governor Uytenhoove clad in armour leading his troops. The besieged then launched a counterattack and after an hour of desperate fighting the Spanish were repulsed with heavy loss; Uytenhoove however was severely wounded in the melee.[102]With the repulse in the West Bulwark the Spanish had launched another attack on thePolder.Here too was savage hand-to-hand combat with pikes and clubs pulled from the fascines but the besiegers finally overwhelmed thePolder bulwark,whilst the besieged withdrew to their inner entrenchments.[103]Losses to both sides were high with 1,200 men in total lost in the struggle.[102]Uytenhoove would be replaced by Daniel d'Hertaing; the 5th replacement within the year and the last.[101]

On 25 July a convoy managed to get into Ostend with reinforcements of 800 Zealanders which was some compensation but it was to be the last major reinforcement the garrison would get.[101]Soon after unseasonable storms played havoc on the defences of Ostend and with it Dutch supply ships were finding it difficult to make their way into Ostend.[92]

On 22 August two days after the surrender of Sluis, a combination of high tide and another storm swept away a significant proportion of theNew Troyshrinking the defenders position further; the Northern defences were abandoned leaving only theHelmundandSandhilllightly guarded.[103]Eventually this was abandoned as the position could barely be defended and on 13 September the Spanish took possession that had defied them for nearly three years and began to bombard the walls in front of the Old Haven.[101]The position was now untenable, the besieged were now holding out in the rubble strewn old town.[1]The bloody war of attrition had at last succeeded and the garrison sent messengers to Maurice to try and assist.[1]

“Le Memorable Siege d’Ostende”, by Christophle de Bonours, about the Siege of Ostend, published in Brussels in 1628. Page 585, shown right, describes the death of Jeroni Desclergue fromMontblancnearTarragonainSpain.English translation: Camp master Antuñes having advanced far towards the new fortification of the Besieged, had dug a mine, which he opened by fire, at the beginning of September. It played so aptly that an English enemy Lieutenant named Benethon, a Sergeant, and about forty Soldiers will remain suffocated there. Having seen the opening, a Spaniard named Don Jeroni Desclergue advanced promptly with his company to fortify the breach, following the order of Maistre de camp. However, it was too early, so the Besieged, by a subsequent detonation, were buried alive there, Captain, Ensign, Sergeant, and Soldiers.

Surrender

[edit]

Maurice's capture of Sluis, however, had made it less essential for the Republic to hold on to Ostend; he and the States-General had assessed the situation with William Lodewijk pointing out that any such relief would be difficult.[105]A decision thus was made to grant the Ostend garrison permission to surrender. Daniel d'Hertaing thus decided to send away all the Spanish deserters, heretical preachers, and other potential troublemakers that might have caused problems during the surrender.[72][101]Fighting, however, continued during the days preceding the capitulation; Charles Fairfax, the commander of the English companies still fighting at Ostend, was killed in battle on 17 September.[106]

Finally, an accord was signed on 20 September; d'Hertaing surrendered the city to the forces of Ambrosio Spinola.[4]The articles of capitulation granted the defenders full military honours.[105]

Aftermath

[edit]

The garrison of no more than 3,000[4]to 3,500[107]marched out with flags flying and drums beating and were allowed to go toFlushingwithout harm while Spinola entertained the officers at a banquet.[108]At this point the Spaniards and their empire troops had lost between 60,000 and 70,000 men in the fighting.[2][105]The Dutch and their allies had lost in the region of 30,000 to 40,000; records state that nearly 1,000 healthy soldiers were needed every month to replace the injured, dead and sick.[75]Between July 1601 and June 1604 a total of 151 Dutch and English companies served in Ostend alongside to the figure of 2,800.[109]

Albert and Isabella

After the surrender, the Spanish army entered a completely devastated city that shocked many; Isabella wept at the desolation.[108][110]Three years, two months and two weeks of siege under almost constant fire of artillery as well as defence efforts to rebuild the walls at the expense of the buildings had left Ostend but a wasteland of rubble.[111]

Of the 3,000 civilians in Ostend, the majority had left en masse during the early part of the siege, and by the end only two civilians remained: the wife of afreebooterand herparamour,a journeymanblacksmith.[108]

After the eventual capture, Ambrosio Spinola was appointed field marshal general and supreme commander of the army in Flanders while Juan de Ribas, was made the new Governor of Ostend.[112]

Meanwhile, the garrison arrived at the newly captured Sluis, and Maurice received them with the pomp and ceremony and both officers and private men were promoted or otherwise rewarded.[108][113]

Isabella entering the rubble of Ostend; she wept at the desolation

The Habsburg authorities considered the capture of Ostend as a propaganda incentive, but the time, money and heavy casualties invested in the siege turned this into a propaganda failure.[108]The economic and military fatigue from the long siege would force both sides to maintain a small truce during the winter of 1604–1605.[79]By the end of that year however, Spinola seized the initiative, bringing the war north of the great rivers for the first time since 1594.[114]Under Spinola, the Spanish made major advances into Dutch territory, capturingOldenzaal,Lingen,RijnberkandGroenlodespite the efforts of Maurice.[115]The Spanish did not repeat the success that Maurice had achieved from 1590–1600, but Spinola had made significant gains in a short time and had caused panic in the Republic when he invaded theZutphen quarter of Gelderland,showing that the interior of the Republic was still vulnerable to Spanish attack.[116][117]However, Spinola was satisfied with the psychological effect of his incursion and did not press the attack. Maurice decided on a rare autumn campaign in an attempt to close the apparent gap in the Republic's eastern defences. He retook Lochem, but his siege of Oldenzaal failed in November 1606. This was the last major campaign on both sides before the truce that was concluded in 1609. The strategic result of the Spanish gains of 1605–06 was that the Twenthe and Zutphen quarters were to remain a kind ofno man's landright down to 1633, during which they were forced to paytributeto the Spanish forces that often roamed there at will.[118]

The Spanish strategic intent to wrest from the Dutch their only military port in the western part of the North Sea, was offset by the conquest of Sluis by Maurice,[107]which thereafter came to replace Ostend as a base of operations for the Dutch military.[119][120]In 1605 theDutch East India Company(VoC) made serious inroads into the Portuguese spice trade, by setting up bases in theMoluccas.[121]These advances signalled a potential threat that the conflict might spread further in the Spanish overseas empire. That threat became more apparent when the Dutch scored a major naval victory over the Spanish fleet intended to find the merchant ships of the VoC atGibraltar in 1607.[114]In addition, the scale of the Ostend siege and Spinola's subsequent campaign had exhausted the Spanish treasury so much that in November 1607 Philip III announced a suspension of payments after the Spanish Royal Treasury had declared bankruptcy.[7][122]The balance of power had led to a balance of exhaustion and after decades of war, both sides were finally prepared to open negotiations leading to theTwelve Years' Truce.[1][119]As a result, the draining Ostend siege has been accounted aPyrrhicvictory for Spain.[111][116][123][124]

Analysis

[edit]
Ostend's military machines byPompeo Giustiniani1 & 3, the construction ofwickerfilled with stones and earth were buried in the trenches by the besiegers; they were used in the western part of the town to allow the fording of the Old Haven. 2 & 4, to the east, the deeper flowing channel Geule of the Old Haven, adamwas constructed by Count Bucquoy's troops on which rode artillery pieces to prevent the entry of ships into the harbour during low tide; 6 Cannons mounted on parapets on top of boats that ventured close to bomb the city; this design would be a failure as it sank on its maiden voyage without even firing a shot. 8 Mobile drawbridge orTargone bridge:this too was a failure after it took a direct hit.[72]

The siege of Ostend was the longest military campaign of the Eighty Years' War, and one of the longest and bloodiest sieges in world history: more than 100,000 people were killed, wounded or succumbed to disease; on each side, a precise number of casualties is impossible to pin down.[1][10]Four hundred years after the siege, in the refurbishment of the city, human remains were still being discovered.[125]

The siege involved people of different lands and religions.Pope Clement VIIIhad supported the Spanish cause, sending money and military advisers to the siege.Emanuel van Meteren,one of the chroniclers of the siege, defined Ostend as "a potpourri of nationalities".[95]

Military engineering

[edit]

With Ostend being supplied from the sea, regular siege warfare techniques were infeasible. The royal army's military engineers were forced to devise new methods to facilitate the capture of the town.[72]The Italian architectPompeo Targonehad many devices designed for this purpose but in the end they were largely ineffective.[126]

School of war

[edit]

According to American historianJohn Lothrop Motleyand others, the siege of Ostend became progressively known as a 'great academy' in which the science and the art of war taught by the most skilful practitioners to all of Europe.[127]Many names were given to the siege by pamphlets such as Military school of Europe, War College and the New Troy.[127]

Distinguished families in Europe flocked to the inside and outside of Ostend. Many from Scotland and France as well as England and Holland went to learn of the art of war under Francis Vere whom they considered a distinguished veteran, despite the act that he was considerably annoyed by all the attention.[128]

Legacy and anecdotes

[edit]
  • The Ostend campaign was widely covered in the media of the time. The newspaper "Belägerung der Statt Ostende" (siege of Ostend by Anonymous), circulated throughout Europe and was translated into several languages.[129]
  • Sebastian Vrancx,Cornelis de Wael,Peter Snayerscreated paintings and prints of the siege.
  • CartographersFloris BalthasarandJoan Blaeu,drew maps of the siege.
  • Don Giovanni de' Medicireported extensively about Pompeo Targoni's military devices and accompanied his letters with sketches and models of the siege of Ostend. Medici ordered hisdraughtsmanto make a huge scale model of the town and defences.[130]
  • Guido Bentivoglio,Emanuel van Meteren,Hugo Grotiusnotable historians of the time, were among the witnesses who recorded their experiences. TheLeidenprinter and publisher,Hendrick van Haestensprovided accounts of the fighting in three publications.[131]
  • Cyril Tourneurwho was at Ostend from 1601–02 – references the parley stratagem employed by Francis Vere inThe Atheist's Tragedy[129]
  • The Dutch dead included Hendrick van Rensselaer the father ofKiliaen van Rensselaer,ancestor of the prominent American political family – the van Rensselaer family ofNew York.[132]
  • According to legend, the Archduchess Isabella Clara Eugenia promised not to change her underwear until the city of Ostend had been conquered. The long duration of the siege led to the colour of her clothes white to dark.[133][134]
  • In 1603 the Dutch minted a commemorative medal to the siege of Ostend with a satirical theme, on the obverse of the coin, a fox, representing Spain, looking up at a rooster in a tree, symbolizing Ostend. On the reverse, a map of the city. The obverse of thisjetonrefers toAesop's fableof theFoxand the Crow/rooster. This fable warns against listening to flattery.[135]
  • Jeroni Desclergue, born inMontblanc,Tarragona,Spain,stemmed from the family who lived at the Casal dels Desclergues on the town square, was a member of the Corts of Barcelona in 1599, and was killed during the Siege of Ostend in 1604.[136]His son, Antoni Desclergue, born inBarcelona,equally had a military career.[137]
  • The artillery fire against the city became so numerous and intense that the cannonballs fired by the Spanish guns were piled on the outside of the city walls by the defenders. The new cannon shots made them bounce like marbles.[12]
  • Cornelis de Wael's depiction of the siege of Ostend
    Cornelis de Wael's depiction of the siege of Ostend
  • pamphlets regarding the siege
    pamphlets regarding the siege
  • Reconstruction of siege material
    Reconstruction of siege material
  • Dutch commemorative coin of the siege
    Dutch commemorative coin of the siege

References

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^
    Note A:The battle has been noted as aPyrrhic victoryfor Spain[17][138]
    • Simoni, (2003) p 10A pyrrhic victory
    • Sandler, (2002) p 650was at best a pyrrhic victory
  2. ^
    Note B:van Nimwegen p 143these were refreshed by rotation via the North Sea

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^abcdefMotley, John Lothrop (1898).The Rise of the Dutch Republic, Entire 1566–74.Harvard University: Harper & brothers. pp. 751–54.
  2. ^abcTucker p 13
  3. ^abvan Nimwegen p 189
  4. ^abcdeMotley, John Lothrop (1869).History of the United Netherlands from the death of William the silent to the Synod of Dort, with a full view of the English-Dutch struggle against Spain, and of the origin and destruction of the Spanish armada, Volume 4.Oxford University. pp. 199–200.
  5. ^Bertodano, Joseph (1740).Coleccion De Los Tratados.p. 479.
  6. ^Keightley, Thomas (1830).Outlines of History Cabinet cyclopaedia.Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green; and John Taylor. p. 351.
  7. ^abcdefCooper pp 263–65
  8. ^Knight, Charles Raleigh:Historical records of The Buffs, East Kent Regiment (3rd Foot) formerly designated the Holland Regiment and Prince George of Denmark's Regiment.Vol I. London, Gale & Polden, 1905,p 50
  9. ^Simoni p.10
  10. ^abBelleroche p 14
  11. ^abcdefvan Nimwegen pp 171–73
  12. ^abcdefghDuffy p 85
  13. ^Fissel p 188
  14. ^abcdefghijkMarkham pp 308–10
  15. ^Edmundson pp 102–03
  16. ^Israel (1998), p.260
  17. ^abCortés, Manuel Lomas (2008).La expulsión de los moriscos del Reino de Aragón: política y administración de una deportación (1609–1611).Centro de Estudios Mudéjares. p. 38.ISBN9788496053311.
  18. ^Malland p 31It was in many respects a Pyrrhic victory
  19. ^Ghelderode p 5
  20. ^Motley p. 754
  21. ^Tracy, pp 75–78
  22. ^Israel (1997), pp 180–81
  23. ^Israel (1997) p 191
  24. ^abcdeBelleroche pp 23–26
  25. ^Israel, p 213
  26. ^Glete pp 155–56
  27. ^Naphy p 107
  28. ^Wedgwood p 55
  29. ^Munck p 51
  30. ^Williams p 125
  31. ^abParthesius p 11
  32. ^abBorman pp 224–25
  33. ^abcdeKnightp 49
  34. ^Duffy p 59
  35. ^abcdefMotleypp 57–59
  36. ^abParker/Martin pp 126–127
  37. ^abcdefFissel pp 184–85
  38. ^abcBelleroche pp 29–33
  39. ^Allen p 123
  40. ^Belleroche p 15
  41. ^Walton, Clifford Elliot (1894).History of the British Standing Army. A.D. 1660 to 1700.Harrison and Sons. p.362.ISBN9785879426748.
  42. ^abcdeDalton pp 75–76
  43. ^Fissel p 170
  44. ^abcBelleroche pp 40–42
  45. ^abcdMotleypp 60 – 61
  46. ^Dunthorne p 223
  47. ^abcdLee, Sidney,ed. (1899)."Vere, Francis".Dictionary of National Biography.Vol. 58. London: Smith, Elder & Co. pp. 232–33.
  48. ^Dunthorne p 62
  49. ^abvan Nimwegen pp 174–76
  50. ^abcdeBorman pp 230- 32
  51. ^Belleroche p 43
  52. ^abBelleroche pp 49–50
  53. ^Edelman p 338
  54. ^Markham pp 317–18
  55. ^Nicholas, A. H. (1835).The Republic of Letters: A Republication of Standard Literature, Volume 4.Pennsylvania State University: G. Dearborn. pp. 66–67.
  56. ^abcdefBelleroche pp 51–53
  57. ^abMotleypp 69–70
  58. ^abcdefghMarkham pp 318–23
  59. ^abcdefghKnightpp 51–52
  60. ^abMotleypp 72 – 74
  61. ^abcdevan Nimwegen pp 178–80
  62. ^abcdMotleypp 75- 81
  63. ^abcdeMarkham pp 323–5
  64. ^abcSimoni pp 97–8
  65. ^abcdeFissel pp 186
  66. ^abcdeMotleypp 82 – 83
  67. ^abcdBelleroche pp 54-56-
  68. ^abcdefTrim, D. J. B. (2004).Vere, Horace, Baron Vere of Tilbury (1565–1635) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.Oxford University Press.
  69. ^abcdefgMotleypp 84 – 86
  70. ^abcdeMarkham pp 326–29
  71. ^abcdBelleroche pp 58–60
  72. ^abcdeDuffy p 86
  73. ^Firth, Charles Harding (1693).Stuart Tracts, 1603–1693 Volume 7 of English garner.E. P. Dutton and Company Limited. p. 209.
  74. ^abBelleroche pp 61–62
  75. ^abcdeFissel pp 186–87
  76. ^abWilliams 1998,p. 380.
  77. ^abvan Nimwegen pp 180–82
  78. ^abMotleypp 104–05
  79. ^abcdeMarkham pp 330–32
  80. ^abcdeBelleroche pp 65–66
  81. ^Motleyp 109
  82. ^abRowse p 413
  83. ^van Nimwegen p 187
  84. ^Hammer, Paul (2003).Elizabeth's Wars: War, Government and Society in Tudor England, 1544–1604.Palgrave Macmillan. p. 234.ISBN0230629768.
  85. ^Arshagouni Papazian, Mary (2003). ""Souldiers of one army" John Donne and the Army of the States General as an international Protestant crossroads, 1595–1625 ".John Donne and the Protestant Reformation: New Perspectives.Wayne State University Press. p. 166.ISBN0814337597.
  86. ^abcdMotleypp 111–13
  87. ^abcdvan Nimwegen pp 183–84
  88. ^Belleroche p 67
  89. ^Motleypp 106–09
  90. ^Wernham pp 400–01
  91. ^abcvan Nimwegen p 185
  92. ^abcdefDuffy pp 88–9
  93. ^Motleypp 118
  94. ^Belleroche p 70
  95. ^abcdeMotleypp 171–72
  96. ^abcdefgBelleroche pp 72–73
  97. ^abcdeMotleypp 175–77
  98. ^abMotley (1869)pp 189–98
  99. ^abKnightp 53
  100. ^abSimoni pp 189–90
  101. ^abcdefvan Nimwegen pp 185–87
  102. ^abcdeMotley (1869)pp 180–81
  103. ^abcdeBelleroche pp 75–76
  104. ^"Reports".Great Britain. Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts:117. 1936.
  105. ^abcBelleroche pp 77–78
  106. ^Arshagouni Papazian, Mary (2003).""Souldiers of one army" John Donne and the Army of the States General as an international Protestant crossroads, 1595–1625 ".John Donne and the Protestant Reformation: New Perspectives.Wayne State University Press. p. 187.ISBN0814337597.
  107. ^abKnightp 54
  108. ^abcdeMotleypp 201–02
  109. ^van Nimwegen p 143
  110. ^Young, Alexander (1895).History of the Netherlands (Holland and Belgium).The Werner school and family library: Werner Company. p.483.
  111. ^abBelleroche pp. 78
  112. ^De Montpleinchamp, M (1870).Histoire de l'archiduc Albert: gouverneur général puis prince souverain de la Belgique Volume 34.Ghent University: Société de l'histoire de Belgique. p. 234.
  113. ^Astley, Terry (1795).An Historical Account of the British Regiments Employed Since the Reign of Queen Elizabeth and King James I. in the Formation and Defence of the Dutch Republic.University of Michigan: T. Kay. p. 14.
  114. ^abAllen p 233
  115. ^Belleroche pp 82–83
  116. ^abMalland p 31
  117. ^Markham p 331-32
  118. ^Israel (1995), pp. 261–2
  119. ^abParker p 232
  120. ^Edmundson p 102-03
  121. ^Israel (1982) pp 5–9
  122. ^Alcalá-Zamora p 30
  123. ^Edmundson p 102-03Albert and Isabella entered Ostend in triumph, but it was a Pyrrhic victory
  124. ^Degroot 2018,p. 185.
  125. ^"Archaeology in Flanders".Marine Biology Research group.Ghent University.
  126. ^Simoni p 154
  127. ^abMotleypp 63 – 64
  128. ^Dunthorne p 75
  129. ^abHoenselaars pp 27–8
  130. ^Cools, Keblusek & Noldus p 92
  131. ^Simoni p 8
  132. ^Spooner(1907), p. 6
  133. ^Maerz p 49
  134. ^disraeli p 94–95
  135. ^Jeton1603 (Dordrecht)
  136. ^Declercq, Nico F. (2021). "Chapter 18: Jeroni Desclergue y Cortes (DC05) & Felipa de Montoya".The Desclergues of la Villa Ducal de Montblanc.Nico F. Declercq. pp. 193–288.ISBN9789083176901.
  137. ^Declercq, Nico F. (2021). "Chapter 23: Antoni Desclergue y de Montoya (DC06)".The Desclergues of la Villa Ducal de Montblanc.Nico F. Declercq. pp. 315–372.ISBN9789083176901.
  138. ^Castellón, Enrique López (1985).Historia de Castilla y León. 6, La crisis del siglo XVII: de Felipe III a Carlos II, Volume 6.Ediciones Reno. p. 66.ISBN9788486155063.

Bibliography

[edit]

Journals

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toSiege of Ostend.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Siege_of_Ostend&oldid=1234251591"