State ownership

State ownership,also calledpublic ownershiporgovernment ownership,is the ownership of anindustry,asset,property,orenterpriseby the national government of a country orstate,or apublic bodyrepresenting a community, as opposed to anindividualorprivate party.^[1]Public ownership specifically refers to industries selling goods and services to consumers and differs frompublic goodsand government services financed out of agovernment's general budget.^[2]Public ownership can take place at thenational,regional,local,ormunicipallevels of government; or can refer to non-governmental public ownership vested in autonomouspublic enterprises.Public ownership is one of the three major forms of property ownership, differentiated from private,collective/cooperative,andcommon ownership.^[3]

Inmarket-basedeconomies, state-owned assets are often managed and operated asjoint-stock corporationswith a government owning all or a controlling stake of the company'sshares.This form is often referred to as astate-owned enterprise.A state-owned enterprise might variously operate as anot-for-profit corporation,as it may not be required to generate a profit; as a commercial enterprise in competitive sectors; or as anatural monopoly.Governments may also use the profitable entities they own to support the general budget. The creation of a state-owned enterprise from other forms of public property is calledcorporatization.

InSoviet-type economies,state property was the dominant form of industry as property. The state held a monopoly on land and natural resources, and enterprises operated under the legal framework of a nominallyplanned economy,and thus according to different criteria than enterprises in market and mixed economies.

Nationalizationis a process of transferring private or municipal assets to a central government or state entity.Municipalizationis the process of transferring private or state assets to a municipal government.

State-owned enterprise[edit]

A state-owned enterprise is a commercial enterprise owned by a government entity in acapitalistmarket ormixed economy.Reasons for state ownership of commercial enterprises are that the enterprise in question is anatural monopolyor because the government is promotingeconomic developmentandindustrialization.State-owned enterprises may or may not be expected to operate in a broadly commercial manner and may or may not havemonopoliesin their areas of activity. The transformation of public entities and government agencies into government-owned corporations is sometimes a precursor toprivatization.

State capitalisteconomies are capitalist market economies that have high degrees of government-owned businesses.

Relation to socialism[edit]

Public ownership of themeans of productionis a subset ofsocial ownership,which is the defining characteristic of asocialisteconomy. However, state ownership and nationalization by themselves are not socialist, as they can exist under a wide variety of differentpoliticalandeconomic systemsfor a variety of different reasons. State ownership by itself does not imply social ownership where income rights belong to society as a whole. As such, state ownership is only one possible expression of public ownership, which itself is one variation of the broader concept of social ownership.^[4]^[5]

In the context of socialism, public ownership implies that thesurplus productgenerated by publicly owned assets accrues to all of society in the form of asocial dividend,as opposed to a distinct class of private capital owners. There is a wide variety of organizational forms for state-run industry, ranging from specialized technocratic management to directworkers' self-management.In traditional conceptions of non-market socialism, public ownership is a tool to consolidate the means of production as a precursor to the establishment ofeconomic planningfor the allocation of resources between organizations, as required by government or by the state.

State ownership is advocated as a form of social ownership for practical concerns, with the state being seen as the obvious candidate for owning and operating the means of production. Proponents assume that the state, as the representative of thepublic interest,would manage resources and production for the benefit of the public.^[6]As a form of social ownership, state ownership may be contrasted with cooperatives and common ownership. Socialist theories and political ideologies that favor state ownership of the means of production may be labelledstate socialism.

State ownership was recognized byFriedrich EngelsinSocialism: Utopian and Scientificas, by itself, not doing away with capitalism, including the process ofcapital accumulationand structure of wage labor. Engels argued that state ownership of commercial industry would represent the final stage of capitalism, consisting of ownership and management of large-scale production and manufacture by the state.^[7]

Within the United Kingdom, public ownership is mostly associated with theLabour Party(acentre-left democratic socialistparty), specifically due to the creation ofClause IVof the "Labour Party Manifesto" in 1918. "Clause IV" was written byFabian SocietymemberSidney Webb.

User rights[edit]

When ownership of a resource is vested in the state, or any branch of the state such as alocal authority,individual use "rights" are based on the state's management policies, though these rights are notproperty rightsas they are not transmissible. For example, if a family is allocated an apartment that is state owned, it will have been granted atenancyof the apartment, which may be lifelong or inheritable, but the management and control rights are held by variousgovernment departments.^[8]

Public property[edit]

There is a distinction to be made between state ownership and public property. The former may refer to assets operated by a specific state institution or branch of government, used exclusively by that branch, such as a research laboratory. The latter refers to assets and resources owned by the population of a state which are mostly available to the entire public for use, such as a public park (seepublic space).

Criticism[edit]

Inneoclassical economic theory,the desirability of state ownership has been studied usingcontract theory.According to the property rights approach based onincomplete contracting(developed byOliver Hartand his co-authors), ownership matters because it determines what happens in contingencies that were not considered in prevailing contracts.^[9]

The work by Hart, Shleifer and Vishny (1997) is the leading application of the property rights approach to the question whether state ownership or private ownership is desirable.^[10]In their model, the government and a private firm can invest to improve the quality of a public good and to reduce its production costs. It turns out that private ownership results in strong incentives to reduce costs, but it may also lead to poor quality. Hence, depending on the available investment technologies, there are situations in which state ownership is better. The Hart-Shleifer-Vishny theory has been extended in many directions. For instance, some authors have also considered mixed forms of private ownership and state ownership.^[11]In the Hart-Shleifer-Vishny model it is assumed that all parties have the same information, while Schmitz (2023) has studied an extension of their analysis allowing forasymmetric information.^[12]Moreover, the Hart-Shleifer-Vishny model assumes that the private party derives no utility from provision of the public good. Besley and Ghatak (2001) have shown that if the private party (a non-governmental organization) cares about the public good, then the party with the larger valuation of the public good should always be the owner, regardless of the parties' investment technologies.^[13]

More recently, some authors have shown that the investment technology also matters in the Besley-Ghatak framework if an investing party is indispensable^[14]or if there are bargaining frictions between the government and the private party.^[15]

References[edit]

^"Public Ownership".Oxford Dictionaries.Archived fromthe originalon January 26, 2018.RetrievedJanuary 25,2018.Ownership by the government of an asset, corporation, or industry.
^Tupper, Allan (February 7, 2006)."Public Ownership".The Canadian Encyclopedia.Historica Canada.RetrievedJanuary 25,2018.public ownership generally refers to enterprises, wholly or partially government owned, which sell goods and services at a price according to use. According to this definition, government-owned railways, airlines, and utilities are examples of public ownership, but hospitals, highways and public schools are not.
^Gregory, Paul R.; Stuart, Robert C. (2003).Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century.Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 27.ISBN 0-618-26181-8.There are three broad forms of property ownership-private, public, and collective (cooperative).
^Hastings, Adrian; Mason, Alistair; Pyper, Hugh (December 21, 2000).The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought.Oxford University Press. p.677.ISBN 978-0198600244.Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a 'co-operative commonwealth' could not be the result of the 'general nationalization of all industries' unless there was a change in 'the character of the state'.
^Ellman, Michael (1989).Socialist Planning.Cambridge University Press. p. 327.ISBN 0-521-35866-3.State ownership of the means of production is not necessarily social ownership and state ownership can hinder efficiency.
^Arnold, Scott (1994).The Philosophy and Economics of Market Socialism: A Critical Study.Oxford University Press. pp.44.ISBN 978-0195088274.For a variety of philosophical and practical reasons touched on in chapter 1, the most obvious candidate in modern societies for that role has been the state. In the past, this led socialists to favor nationalization as the primary way of socializing the means of production…The idea is that just as private ownership serves private interests, public or state ownership would serve the public interest.
^Frederick Engels."Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chpt. 3)".Marxists.org.Retrieved2014-01-08.
^Clarke, Alison; Paul Kohler (2005).Property law: commentary and materials.Cambridge University Press. p. 40.ISBN 9780521614894.
^Hart, Oliver (1995)."Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure".Oxford University Press.
^Hart, Oliver; Shleifer, Andrei; Vishny, Robert W. (1997)."The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons"(PDF).The Quarterly Journal of Economics.112(4): 1127–1161.doi:10.1162/003355300555448.ISSN 0033-5533.S2CID 16270301.
^Hoppe, Eva I.; Schmitz, Patrick W. (2010). "Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investment tasks".Journal of Public Economics.94(3–4): 258–268.doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.009.
^Schmitz, Patrick W. (2023)."The proper scope of government reconsidered: Asymmetric information and incentive contracts"(PDF).European Economic Review.157:104511.doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104511.ISSN 0014-2921.S2CID 259487043.
^Besley, Timothy; Ghatak, Maitreesh (2001). "Government versus Private Ownership of Public Goods".The Quarterly Journal of Economics.116(4): 1343–1372.CiteSeerX10.1.1.584.6739.doi:10.1162/003355301753265598.JSTOR 2696461.S2CID 39187118.
^Halonen-Akatwijuka, Maija (2012). "Nature of human capital, technology and ownership of public goods".Journal of Public Economics.Fiscal Federalism.96(11–12): 939–945.CiteSeerX10.1.1.173.3797.doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.005.S2CID 154075467.
^Schmitz, Patrick W. (2015)."Government versus private ownership of public goods: The role of bargaining frictions".Journal of Public Economics.132:23–31.doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.09.009.

v t e Public services
Municipalization Nationalization Progressive tax
Concepts	Common good Free-culture movement Free newspaper Product sample Public administration Public bad Public domain Public good (economics) Public health Public interest Public land Public ownership Public policy Public rights Public procurement Public trust Public value Universal access to education Universal basic services
Basic services	Civil service Fire department Law enforcement Postal service Savings system Public broadcasting Public transport Universal basic services
Public utility	Electric utility Oil & gas Telecommunication Municipal broadband Public infrastructure Public water system Waste management
Public works	Drinking fountain Free clinic Free education Infrastructure Needle and syringe programmes Public art Public bank Public bookcase Public computer Public hospital Public library Public open space Public school Public space Public toilet Public university Supervised injection site Urban park
Social services	Publicly funded health care Public housing Job creation Job guarantee Single-payer health care National health insurance Social insurance Social pension Social security Youth services
See also	Commons Government auction Public float Public holiday Public offering Public sector Public security Public use Public viewing area
Category Commons

Authority control databases
National	Germany Japan Czech Republic
Other	Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine