Storm over the gentry
TheStorm over the gentrywas a major historiographical debate among scholars that took place in the 1940s and 1950s regarding the role of the gentry in causing theEnglish Civil Warof the 17th century. (The Britishgentrywas the rich landowners who were not members of the aristocracy.)[1]
Economic historianR.H. Tawneyhad suggested in 1941 that there was a major economic crisis for the nobility in the 16th and 17th centuries and that the rapidly-rising gentry class was demanding a share of power. When the aristocracy resisted, Tawney argued, the gentry launched the civil war.[2]
Lawrence Stone,in a 1948 article,[3]made an effort to use statistical data and methods to prove Tawney's thesis. However, Stone's argument was marred by methodological mistakes, and he came under heavy attack fromHugh Trevor-Roperand others.[4]Trevor-Roper argued that the gentry was declining and so tried to improve its fortune through the law or the court office. Christopher Thompson, for example, showed that the peerage's real income was higher in 1602 than in 1534 and grew substantially by 1641. Many other scholars entered the fray and produced many valuable studies.[5]
American scholar JH Hexter developed a widely accepted view that largely ended the debate by saying neither a rise nor a decline of the gentry could explain the Civil War; such theories could explain only a deliberate revolution, which did not take place.[6]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^Ronald H. Fritze & William B. Robison (1996).Historical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603-1689.Greenwood. pp.205–7.ISBN9780313283918.
- ^R. H. Tawney, "The Rise of the Gentry, 1558-1640,"Economic History Review(1941) 11#1 pp. 1-38in JSTOR
- ^Stone, "The Anatomy of the Elizabethan Aristocracy,"Economic History Review(1948) 18#1 pp. 1-53in JSTOR
- ^H. R. Trevor-Roper, "The Elizabethan Aristocracy: An Anatomy Anatomized,"Economic History Review(1951) 3#3 pp. 279-298in JSTOR
- ^Conrad Russell,The Crisis of Parliaments: English History, 1509-1660(1971) p 197
- ^J.H. Hexter, 'Storm over the Gentry', inReappraisals in History(1961) pp 117-62
Further reading[edit]
- Fritze, Ronald H. & William B. Robison (1996).Historical Dictionary of Stuart England, 1603-1689.Greenwood. pp.205–7.ISBN9780313283918.
- Hexter, J.H.On History(1979) pp. 149-236.
- Hexter, Jack H.Reappraisals in history: New views on history and society in early modern Europe(1961)
- Loades, David, ed.Reader's Guide to British History(2003) 2:1200-1206
- MacDonald, William W. "English Historians Repeating Themselves: The Refining of the Whig Interpretation of the English Revolution and Civil War."Journal of Thought(1972): 166-175.online
- Richardson, R.C.The Debate on the English Revolution(Issues in Historiography) (1998). pp 98-132.
- Stone, Lawrence.Social Change and Revolution in England, 1540–1640(1965)
- Stone, Lawrence.The Crisis of the Aristocracy, 1558–1641(1965), 841pp
- Trevor-Roper, R. H."The Gentry 1540-1640."Economic History Review1 (1953): 1-55.
- Tawney, R. H. "The rise of the gentry, 1558-1640."Economic History Review11.1 (1941): 1-38.online;launched a historiographical debate
- Tawney, R. H. "The rise of the gentry: a postscript."Economic History Review7.1 (1954): 91-97.online
