Talk:.17 Remington
Appearance
This is thetalk pagefor discussing improvements to the.17 Remingtonarticle. This isnot a forumfor general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:Google(books·news·scholar·free images·WP refs)·FENS·JSTOR·TWL |
This article is ratedStart-classon Wikipedia'scontent assessmentscale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Military History (not)
[edit]I'm just curious how this relates to military history, I was unaware of any military use of this cartridge. Thanks for the info.Arthurrh17:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC) Removed Military History tag - it was incorrect.Arthurrh17:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Minor reference error.
[edit]The text calls out use of the.223 Rem as the basis and is necked down... ok - fine. The specifications on the right state parent is.222
I think the.222 is in error. Martin— Precedingunsignedcomment added by64.92.36.106(talk)03:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)