Talk:.sj

InternetLow‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Internet,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theInterneton Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importanceon theproject's importance scale.

Norway

This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Norway,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofNorwayon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

ArcticLow‑importance

	This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Arctic,a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArcticon Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussionand see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated asLow-importanceon theproject's importance scale.

.sjhas been listed as one of theEngineering and technology good articlesunder thegood article criteria.If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassessit.

.sjis part of theNoridseries,agood topic.This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by theWikipedia community.If you can update or improve it,please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 25, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
November 14, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Pagein the"Did you know?"column onSeptember 17, 2010.

The text of the entry was:Did you know... thatNoridmanages two unusedtop-level domains,.sjforSvalbard and Jan Mayen,and.bvforBouvet Island?

Current status:Good article

Isn't in use

It really isn't in use, for any reason... at least it wasn't when I looked into it:)+sj +10:36, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Uninett.png

Image:Uninett.pngis being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair usebut there is noexplanation or rationaleas to why its use inthisWikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template,you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description pageand edit it to include afair use rationale.Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guidelineis an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion.If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page.Thank you.

BetacommandBot(talk)02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review istranscludedfromTalk:.sj/GA1.The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:Jezhotwells(talk)19:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against theGood Article criteria,following itsnominationfor Good Article status.

Disambiguations:none found.Jezhotwells(talk)19:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot:none found.Jezhotwells(talk)19:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GAreview(seeherefor criteria)

It isreasonably well written.
a(prose):b(MoSforlead,layout,word choice,fiction,andlists):
I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
It isfactually accurateandverifiable.
a(references):b(citations toreliable sources):c(OR):
references check out, I assume good faith for those where my Norwegian isn't up to scratch.
It isbroad in its coverage.
a(major aspects):b(focused):
It says all that needs to be said
It follows theneutral point of viewpolicy.
Fair representation without bias:
It isstable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated byimages,where possible and appropriate.
a(images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales):b(appropriate use withsuitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
OK, short and sweet. I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations!Jezhotwells(talk)19:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the article.Arsenikk ^(talk)19:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on.sj.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thecheckedparameter below totrueorfailedto let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)04:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]