Jump to content

Talk:Actions of 7–8 May 1945

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Action of 7/8 May 1945

[edit]

These two actions should be sepetate, with more thorough research I'm sure the articles can be expanded. Or, they should be combined with theActions of 5/6 May 1945articles under the title of "Last naval actions of WW2" or something like that.--$1LENCE D00600D(talk)05:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What would be the point of separating these? The scope of the page is to look at the last actions of the Battle of the Atlantic, so separating them would serve no purpose. The incidents by themselves would otherwise be covered in the ship articles, if we had them.
As for re-naming it, what is wrong with the current title, exactly? It is less cumbersome than "last actions of the Battle of the Atlantic", as well as being more neutral.Xyl 54(talk)13:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onActions of 7–8 May 1945.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thecheckedparameter below totrueorfailedto let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)17:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]