Jump to content

Talk:Individual psychology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between23 August 2021and8 December 2021.Further details are availableon the course page.Student editor(s):Sok18.Peer reviewers:Kjoi2000.

Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT(talk)00:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onIndividual psychology.Please take a moment to reviewmy edit.If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018,"External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot.No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verificationusing the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permissionto delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfCbefore doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

[edit]
  • I added a line about the criticism from Popper that Adler's individual psychology is not testable. This could be expanded to include the reasons why it fails to be falsifiability. It would be good to expand this section to include other limitations and criticisms of this theory.[1]--Notgain(talk)11:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal, April 2018

[edit]

Suggesting thatAdlerianarticle be merge into thisindividual psychologyandClassical Adlerian psychologyalso be merged too. To avoid confusion we might want to consider naming the article Adlerian individual psychology. --06:14, 28 April 2018 (UTC)— Precedingunsignedcomment added byNotgain(talkcontribs)

To clarify, here is the complete list of articles thatNotgainhas proposed merging intoIndividual psychology:

I will also point out the articleNeo-Adlerian,which should be considered during any content-shifting, if not itself merged as well. I am not sure exactly what is the best solution, but there is clearly some excessivecontent forkingoccurring among these articles.Biogeographist(talk)14:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ForClassical Adlerian psychotherapy,checkYMergercomplete.Klbrain(talk)09:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ForAdlerian,checkYMergercomplete.Klbrain(talk)10:09, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ForClassical Adlerian psychology,checkYMergercomplete.Klbrain(talk)07:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrasing

[edit]

Some parts of the article need paraphrasing. For instance, while looking for sources, I found that the part citing Adler and Maslow's parallel theories had exact wordings from the textCounseling Psychology: An Integrated Positive Psychological Approach.[1]If you have access to related sources, you could start checking the unreferenced contents. Regards,Darwin Naz(talk)22:01, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^Chao, Ruth Chu-Lien (2015).Counseling Psychology: An Integrated Positive Psychological Approach.Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. p. 81.ISBN978-1-118-46812-8.

Clarifying the intro

[edit]

The intro currently takes for granted expert knowledge of the subject.

Specifically: "were intended to mirror the indivisible unity of the personality." Can we rephrase this to make it more accessible?

Secondly, it says "The papers cover the whole range ofhuman psychologyin a single survey. "

What does "a single survey" mean? If the papers were written over the course of years, then in what sense is it "single"? If "single" refers to them being published together as one book, then I believe "volume" or "book" would be a clearer word to use than "survey".BonaparteIII(talk)22:09, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]